WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.350 align:start position:0%
 
foreign

00:00:04.350 --> 00:00:04.360 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:00:04.360 --> 00:00:13.509 align:start position:0%
 
[Music]

00:00:13.509 --> 00:00:13.519 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:00:13.519 --> 00:00:16.670 align:start position:0%
 
you<00:00:14.519><c> know</c><00:00:14.580><c> I</c><00:00:14.940><c> probably</c><00:00:15.179><c> don't</c><00:00:15.420><c> need</c><00:00:15.660><c> to</c><00:00:16.020><c> talk</c>

00:00:16.670 --> 00:00:16.680 align:start position:0%
you know I probably don't need to talk
 

00:00:16.680 --> 00:00:19.250 align:start position:0%
you know I probably don't need to talk
about<00:00:16.859><c> what</c><00:00:17.279><c> Mev</c><00:00:17.760><c> is</c><00:00:17.940><c> as</c><00:00:18.180><c> much</c><00:00:18.359><c> uh</c><00:00:18.779><c> given</c><00:00:19.140><c> that</c>

00:00:19.250 --> 00:00:19.260 align:start position:0%
about what Mev is as much uh given that
 

00:00:19.260 --> 00:00:21.170 align:start position:0%
about what Mev is as much uh given that
there<00:00:19.440><c> were</c><00:00:19.619><c> if</c><00:00:19.800><c> I</c><00:00:19.920><c> remember</c><00:00:20.039><c> right</c><00:00:20.340><c> 17</c><00:00:20.699><c> or</c><00:00:21.000><c> 18</c>

00:00:21.170 --> 00:00:21.180 align:start position:0%
there were if I remember right 17 or 18
 

00:00:21.180 --> 00:00:24.490 align:start position:0%
there were if I remember right 17 or 18
talks<00:00:21.840><c> about</c><00:00:21.960><c> Mev</c><00:00:22.920><c> um</c><00:00:23.039><c> but</c><00:00:23.279><c> you</c><00:00:23.880><c> know</c><00:00:23.939><c> I</c><00:00:24.119><c> think</c>

00:00:24.490 --> 00:00:24.500 align:start position:0%
talks about Mev um but you know I think
 

00:00:24.500 --> 00:00:26.689 align:start position:0%
talks about Mev um but you know I think
in<00:00:25.500><c> the</c><00:00:25.740><c> spirit</c><00:00:25.920><c> of</c><00:00:26.160><c> trying</c><00:00:26.400><c> to</c><00:00:26.580><c> understand</c>

00:00:26.689 --> 00:00:26.699 align:start position:0%
in the spirit of trying to understand
 

00:00:26.699 --> 00:00:29.330 align:start position:0%
in the spirit of trying to understand
the<00:00:27.119><c> incentives</c><00:00:27.560><c> uh</c><00:00:28.560><c> hidden</c><00:00:28.859><c> in</c><00:00:28.920><c> a</c><00:00:29.160><c> lot</c><00:00:29.220><c> of</c>

00:00:29.330 --> 00:00:29.340 align:start position:0%
the incentives uh hidden in a lot of
 

00:00:29.340 --> 00:00:32.150 align:start position:0%
the incentives uh hidden in a lot of
these<00:00:29.580><c> these</c><00:00:29.939><c> systems</c><00:00:30.240><c> one</c><00:00:31.080><c> question</c><00:00:31.260><c> you</c>

00:00:32.150 --> 00:00:32.160 align:start position:0%
these these systems one question you
 

00:00:32.160 --> 00:00:33.889 align:start position:0%
these these systems one question you
might<00:00:32.340><c> ask</c><00:00:32.520><c> is</c><00:00:32.820><c> does</c><00:00:33.180><c> there</c><00:00:33.300><c> exist</c><00:00:33.600><c> sort</c><00:00:33.780><c> of</c>

00:00:33.889 --> 00:00:33.899 align:start position:0%
might ask is does there exist sort of
 

00:00:33.899 --> 00:00:35.870 align:start position:0%
might ask is does there exist sort of
some<00:00:34.079><c> type</c><00:00:34.260><c> of</c><00:00:34.380><c> formal</c><00:00:34.680><c> theory</c><00:00:34.980><c> for</c><00:00:35.160><c> Mev</c><00:00:35.579><c> does</c>

00:00:35.870 --> 00:00:35.880 align:start position:0%
some type of formal theory for Mev does
 

00:00:35.880 --> 00:00:37.490 align:start position:0%
some type of formal theory for Mev does
there<00:00:36.000><c> exist</c><00:00:36.300><c> some</c><00:00:36.420><c> type</c><00:00:36.660><c> of</c><00:00:36.840><c> mathematical</c>

00:00:37.490 --> 00:00:37.500 align:start position:0%
there exist some type of mathematical
 

00:00:37.500 --> 00:00:41.030 align:start position:0%
there exist some type of mathematical
structure<00:00:37.980><c> to</c><00:00:38.420><c> this</c><00:00:39.420><c> thing</c><00:00:39.600><c> that</c><00:00:39.960><c> seems</c><00:00:40.739><c> to</c><00:00:40.800><c> be</c>

00:00:41.030 --> 00:00:41.040 align:start position:0%
structure to this thing that seems to be
 

00:00:41.040 --> 00:00:43.910 align:start position:0%
structure to this thing that seems to be
you<00:00:41.579><c> know</c><00:00:41.700><c> Captivate</c><00:00:42.660><c> people's</c><00:00:43.140><c> imaginations</c>

00:00:43.910 --> 00:00:43.920 align:start position:0%
you know Captivate people's imaginations
 

00:00:43.920 --> 00:00:46.670 align:start position:0%
you know Captivate people's imaginations
yet<00:00:44.399><c> no</c><00:00:44.640><c> one</c><00:00:44.820><c> can</c><00:00:45.000><c> describe</c><00:00:45.420><c> it</c><00:00:45.540><c> and</c><00:00:46.079><c> so</c><00:00:46.320><c> I'm</c>

00:00:46.670 --> 00:00:46.680 align:start position:0%
yet no one can describe it and so I'm
 

00:00:46.680 --> 00:00:47.569 align:start position:0%
yet no one can describe it and so I'm
going<00:00:46.800><c> to</c><00:00:46.920><c> talk</c><00:00:47.040><c> a</c><00:00:47.160><c> little</c><00:00:47.280><c> bit</c><00:00:47.399><c> about</c>

00:00:47.569 --> 00:00:47.579 align:start position:0%
going to talk a little bit about
 

00:00:47.579 --> 00:00:49.610 align:start position:0%
going to talk a little bit about
different<00:00:48.120><c> ways</c><00:00:48.600><c> of</c><00:00:48.780><c> addressing</c><00:00:49.440><c> this</c>

00:00:49.610 --> 00:00:49.620 align:start position:0%
different ways of addressing this
 

00:00:49.620 --> 00:00:51.590 align:start position:0%
different ways of addressing this
problem<00:00:49.879><c> including</c><00:00:50.879><c> some</c><00:00:51.000><c> work</c><00:00:51.180><c> we've</c><00:00:51.360><c> done</c>

00:00:51.590 --> 00:00:51.600 align:start position:0%
problem including some work we've done
 

00:00:51.600 --> 00:00:56.330 align:start position:0%
problem including some work we've done
and<00:00:52.980><c> um</c><00:00:52.980><c> I</c><00:00:53.460><c> I</c><00:00:53.840><c> like</c><00:00:54.840><c> to</c><00:00:55.079><c> call</c><00:00:55.320><c> any</c><00:00:55.800><c> analysis</c><00:00:56.160><c> of</c>

00:00:56.330 --> 00:00:56.340 align:start position:0%
and um I I like to call any analysis of
 

00:00:56.340 --> 00:00:58.490 align:start position:0%
and um I I like to call any analysis of
Mev<00:00:56.699><c> sort</c><00:00:57.059><c> of</c><00:00:57.180><c> measuring</c><00:00:57.840><c> the</c><00:00:58.079><c> cost</c><00:00:58.320><c> of</c>

00:00:58.490 --> 00:00:58.500 align:start position:0%
Mev sort of measuring the cost of
 

00:00:58.500 --> 00:01:01.549 align:start position:0%
Mev sort of measuring the cost of
feudalism<00:00:58.980><c> so</c><00:00:59.340><c> that's</c><00:00:59.760><c> that's</c><00:01:00.480><c> sort</c><00:01:00.780><c> of</c><00:01:00.899><c> where</c>

00:01:01.549 --> 00:01:01.559 align:start position:0%
feudalism so that's that's sort of where
 

00:01:01.559 --> 00:01:03.170 align:start position:0%
feudalism so that's that's sort of where
the<00:01:01.680><c> title</c><00:01:01.980><c> comes</c><00:01:02.160><c> from</c><00:01:02.280><c> let's</c><00:01:02.699><c> start</c><00:01:02.879><c> with</c>

00:01:03.170 --> 00:01:03.180 align:start position:0%
the title comes from let's start with
 

00:01:03.180 --> 00:01:05.870 align:start position:0%
the title comes from let's start with
the<00:01:03.420><c> operative</c><00:01:04.019><c> definition</c><00:01:04.320><c> of</c><00:01:04.680><c> Mev</c><00:01:05.159><c> you</c><00:01:05.760><c> know</c>

00:01:05.870 --> 00:01:05.880 align:start position:0%
the operative definition of Mev you know
 

00:01:05.880 --> 00:01:07.490 align:start position:0%
the operative definition of Mev you know
when<00:01:06.060><c> you</c><00:01:06.240><c> see</c><00:01:06.360><c> it</c><00:01:06.479><c> like</c><00:01:06.720><c> the</c><00:01:06.900><c> of</c><00:01:07.140><c> course</c><00:01:07.260><c> the</c>

00:01:07.490 --> 00:01:07.500 align:start position:0%
when you see it like the of course the
 

00:01:07.500 --> 00:01:11.030 align:start position:0%
when you see it like the of course the
famous<00:01:07.740><c> Supreme</c><00:01:08.040><c> Court</c><00:01:08.520><c> ruling</c><00:01:09.240><c> on</c><00:01:09.540><c> porn</c><00:01:10.040><c> uh</c>

00:01:11.030 --> 00:01:11.040 align:start position:0%
famous Supreme Court ruling on porn uh
 

00:01:11.040 --> 00:01:13.609 align:start position:0%
famous Supreme Court ruling on porn uh
and<00:01:11.400><c> uh</c><00:01:11.640><c> you</c><00:01:12.360><c> know</c><00:01:12.479><c> Mev</c><00:01:12.840><c> comes</c><00:01:13.080><c> in</c><00:01:13.140><c> many</c><00:01:13.260><c> shapes</c>

00:01:13.609 --> 00:01:13.619 align:start position:0%
and uh you know Mev comes in many shapes
 

00:01:13.619 --> 00:01:15.590 align:start position:0%
and uh you know Mev comes in many shapes
and<00:01:13.740><c> sizes</c><00:01:14.040><c> uh</c><00:01:14.880><c> you</c><00:01:15.000><c> know</c><00:01:15.119><c> of</c><00:01:15.240><c> course</c><00:01:15.299><c> we</c><00:01:15.479><c> have</c>

00:01:15.590 --> 00:01:15.600 align:start position:0%
and sizes uh you know of course we have
 

00:01:15.600 --> 00:01:17.230 align:start position:0%
and sizes uh you know of course we have
everything<00:01:15.780><c> from</c><00:01:16.080><c> Sandwich</c><00:01:16.380><c> attacks</c>

00:01:17.230 --> 00:01:17.240 align:start position:0%
everything from Sandwich attacks
 

00:01:17.240 --> 00:01:20.330 align:start position:0%
everything from Sandwich attacks
liquidations<00:01:18.320><c> Arbitrage</c><00:01:19.320><c> nft</c><00:01:19.799><c> front</c><00:01:20.159><c> running</c>

00:01:20.330 --> 00:01:20.340 align:start position:0%
liquidations Arbitrage nft front running
 

00:01:20.340 --> 00:01:21.830 align:start position:0%
liquidations Arbitrage nft front running
and<00:01:20.700><c> cross</c><00:01:20.880><c> chain</c>

00:01:21.830 --> 00:01:21.840 align:start position:0%
and cross chain
 

00:01:21.840 --> 00:01:23.390 align:start position:0%
and cross chain
um<00:01:21.900><c> and</c><00:01:22.080><c> as</c><00:01:22.200><c> you</c><00:01:22.320><c> can</c><00:01:22.439><c> see</c><00:01:22.560><c> there's</c><00:01:22.920><c> it's</c><00:01:23.220><c> sort</c>

00:01:23.390 --> 00:01:23.400 align:start position:0%
um and as you can see there's it's sort
 

00:01:23.400 --> 00:01:25.670 align:start position:0%
um and as you can see there's it's sort
of<00:01:23.520><c> quite</c><00:01:23.880><c> a</c><00:01:24.119><c> variable</c><00:01:24.479><c> form</c><00:01:24.780><c> of</c><00:01:24.960><c> revenue</c><00:01:25.259><c> for</c>

00:01:25.670 --> 00:01:25.680 align:start position:0%
of quite a variable form of revenue for
 

00:01:25.680 --> 00:01:29.090 align:start position:0%
of quite a variable form of revenue for
for<00:01:25.920><c> validators</c><00:01:26.640><c> and</c><00:01:26.880><c> Searchers</c><00:01:27.740><c> uh</c><00:01:28.740><c> and</c>

00:01:29.090 --> 00:01:29.100 align:start position:0%
for validators and Searchers uh and
 

00:01:29.100 --> 00:01:31.789 align:start position:0%
for validators and Searchers uh and
somehow<00:01:29.659><c> we</c><00:01:30.659><c> because</c><00:01:30.960><c> we</c><00:01:31.259><c> know</c><00:01:31.439><c> there</c><00:01:31.740><c> are</c>

00:01:31.789 --> 00:01:31.799 align:start position:0%
somehow we because we know there are
 

00:01:31.799 --> 00:01:34.010 align:start position:0%
somehow we because we know there are
many<00:01:31.979><c> examples</c><00:01:32.460><c> and</c><00:01:32.880><c> we</c><00:01:33.119><c> feel</c><00:01:33.299><c> like</c><00:01:33.540><c> we</c><00:01:33.840><c> can't</c>

00:01:34.010 --> 00:01:34.020 align:start position:0%
many examples and we feel like we can't
 

00:01:34.020 --> 00:01:35.690 align:start position:0%
many examples and we feel like we can't
enumerate<00:01:34.799><c> all</c><00:01:34.920><c> of</c><00:01:35.040><c> them</c><00:01:35.100><c> it</c><00:01:35.280><c> might</c><00:01:35.400><c> feel</c><00:01:35.520><c> like</c>

00:01:35.690 --> 00:01:35.700 align:start position:0%
enumerate all of them it might feel like
 

00:01:35.700 --> 00:01:38.569 align:start position:0%
enumerate all of them it might feel like
the<00:01:35.939><c> space</c><00:01:36.240><c> of</c><00:01:36.900><c> all</c><00:01:37.020><c> mevs</c><00:01:37.619><c> super</c><00:01:37.920><c> big</c><00:01:38.159><c> so</c><00:01:38.400><c> how</c>

00:01:38.569 --> 00:01:38.579 align:start position:0%
the space of all mevs super big so how
 

00:01:38.579 --> 00:01:40.429 align:start position:0%
the space of all mevs super big so how
do<00:01:38.700><c> you</c><00:01:38.759><c> analyze</c><00:01:39.180><c> it</c><00:01:39.299><c> you</c><00:01:39.659><c> know</c><00:01:39.720><c> I</c><00:01:39.900><c> know</c><00:01:40.259><c> there</c>

00:01:40.429 --> 00:01:40.439 align:start position:0%
do you analyze it you know I know there
 

00:01:40.439 --> 00:01:42.230 align:start position:0%
do you analyze it you know I know there
were<00:01:40.560><c> two</c><00:01:40.680><c> talks</c><00:01:41.040><c> yesterday</c><00:01:41.159><c> about</c><00:01:41.520><c> what</c><00:01:42.000><c> is</c>

00:01:42.230 --> 00:01:42.240 align:start position:0%
were two talks yesterday about what is
 

00:01:42.240 --> 00:01:44.990 align:start position:0%
were two talks yesterday about what is
and<00:01:42.420><c> isn't</c><00:01:42.960><c> uh</c><00:01:43.560><c> Mev</c><00:01:43.979><c> but</c><00:01:44.280><c> I</c><00:01:44.400><c> think</c><00:01:44.520><c> we're</c><00:01:44.880><c> going</c>

00:01:44.990 --> 00:01:45.000 align:start position:0%
and isn't uh Mev but I think we're going
 

00:01:45.000 --> 00:01:47.870 align:start position:0%
and isn't uh Mev but I think we're going
to<00:01:45.060><c> focus</c><00:01:45.299><c> on</c><00:01:45.740><c> uh</c><00:01:46.740><c> kind</c><00:01:46.979><c> of</c><00:01:47.100><c> an</c><00:01:47.520><c> operative</c>

00:01:47.870 --> 00:01:47.880 align:start position:0%
to focus on uh kind of an operative
 

00:01:47.880 --> 00:01:51.170 align:start position:0%
to focus on uh kind of an operative
definition<00:01:48.200><c> that</c><00:01:49.200><c> can</c><00:01:49.860><c> be</c><00:01:49.979><c> used</c><00:01:50.100><c> and</c>

00:01:51.170 --> 00:01:51.180 align:start position:0%
definition that can be used and
 

00:01:51.180 --> 00:01:53.990 align:start position:0%
definition that can be used and
uh<00:01:52.020><c> we</c><00:01:52.380><c> could</c><00:01:52.500><c> we</c><00:01:52.799><c> could</c><00:01:52.920><c> sort</c><00:01:53.100><c> of</c><00:01:53.159><c> say</c><00:01:53.340><c> Mev</c><00:01:53.820><c> is</c>

00:01:53.990 --> 00:01:54.000 align:start position:0%
uh we could we could sort of say Mev is
 

00:01:54.000 --> 00:01:56.210 align:start position:0%
uh we could we could sort of say Mev is
any<00:01:54.180><c> excess</c><00:01:54.540><c> value</c><00:01:54.840><c> that</c><00:01:55.439><c> can</c><00:01:55.560><c> be</c><00:01:55.680><c> captured</c><00:01:56.100><c> by</c>

00:01:56.210 --> 00:01:56.220 align:start position:0%
any excess value that can be captured by
 

00:01:56.220 --> 00:01:57.649 align:start position:0%
any excess value that can be captured by
validators

00:01:57.649 --> 00:01:57.659 align:start position:0%
validators
 

00:01:57.659 --> 00:02:00.590 align:start position:0%
validators
by<00:01:58.500><c> reordering</c><00:01:59.159><c> transactions</c><00:01:59.759><c> strategically</c>

00:02:00.590 --> 00:02:00.600 align:start position:0%
by reordering transactions strategically
 

00:02:00.600 --> 00:02:03.109 align:start position:0%
by reordering transactions strategically
adding<00:02:01.020><c> or</c><00:02:01.140><c> removing</c><00:02:01.500><c> transactions</c><00:02:02.220><c> the</c><00:02:02.820><c> idea</c>

00:02:03.109 --> 00:02:03.119 align:start position:0%
adding or removing transactions the idea
 

00:02:03.119 --> 00:02:05.090 align:start position:0%
adding or removing transactions the idea
is<00:02:03.479><c> most</c><00:02:03.780><c> of</c><00:02:03.899><c> this</c><00:02:04.020><c> is</c><00:02:04.259><c> currently</c><00:02:04.500><c> managed</c><00:02:04.860><c> via</c>

00:02:05.090 --> 00:02:05.100 align:start position:0%
is most of this is currently managed via
 

00:02:05.100 --> 00:02:07.910 align:start position:0%
is most of this is currently managed via
off-chain<00:02:05.520><c> auction</c><00:02:05.820><c> so</c><00:02:06.119><c> people</c><00:02:06.299><c> bid</c><00:02:06.719><c> on</c>

00:02:07.910 --> 00:02:07.920 align:start position:0%
off-chain auction so people bid on
 

00:02:07.920 --> 00:02:10.850 align:start position:0%
off-chain auction so people bid on
transaction<00:02:08.520><c> priority</c><00:02:09.440><c> atomicity</c><00:02:10.440><c> you</c><00:02:10.800><c> know</c>

00:02:10.850 --> 00:02:10.860 align:start position:0%
transaction priority atomicity you know
 

00:02:10.860 --> 00:02:14.390 align:start position:0%
transaction priority atomicity you know
and<00:02:10.979><c> within</c><00:02:11.340><c> bundles</c><00:02:11.900><c> uh</c><00:02:12.900><c> and</c><00:02:13.560><c> you</c><00:02:13.980><c> know</c><00:02:14.099><c> if</c><00:02:14.160><c> we</c>

00:02:14.390 --> 00:02:14.400 align:start position:0%
and within bundles uh and you know if we
 

00:02:14.400 --> 00:02:15.890 align:start position:0%
and within bundles uh and you know if we
take<00:02:14.700><c> a</c><00:02:14.879><c> step</c><00:02:15.120><c> back</c><00:02:15.300><c> and</c><00:02:15.480><c> look</c><00:02:15.599><c> at</c><00:02:15.720><c> the</c><00:02:15.780><c> history</c>

00:02:15.890 --> 00:02:15.900 align:start position:0%
take a step back and look at the history
 

00:02:15.900 --> 00:02:18.170 align:start position:0%
take a step back and look at the history
of<00:02:16.140><c> ethereum</c><00:02:16.560><c> of</c><00:02:16.739><c> as</c><00:02:16.980><c> to</c><00:02:17.220><c> why</c><00:02:17.520><c> we</c><00:02:17.700><c> got</c><00:02:17.819><c> to</c><00:02:18.000><c> the</c>

00:02:18.170 --> 00:02:18.180 align:start position:0%
of ethereum of as to why we got to the
 

00:02:18.180 --> 00:02:20.030 align:start position:0%
of ethereum of as to why we got to the
auction<00:02:18.360><c> world</c>

00:02:20.030 --> 00:02:20.040 align:start position:0%
auction world
 

00:02:20.040 --> 00:02:22.250 align:start position:0%
auction world
um<00:02:20.099><c> part</c><00:02:20.340><c> of</c><00:02:20.459><c> the</c><00:02:20.580><c> reason</c><00:02:20.700><c> is</c><00:02:21.420><c> the</c><00:02:21.900><c> blockchain</c>

00:02:22.250 --> 00:02:22.260 align:start position:0%
um part of the reason is the blockchain
 

00:02:22.260 --> 00:02:23.809 align:start position:0%
um part of the reason is the blockchain
was<00:02:22.500><c> just</c><00:02:22.680><c> getting</c><00:02:22.860><c> spammed</c><00:02:23.340><c> by</c><00:02:23.459><c> people</c><00:02:23.640><c> doing</c>

00:02:23.809 --> 00:02:23.819 align:start position:0%
was just getting spammed by people doing
 

00:02:23.819 --> 00:02:25.729 align:start position:0%
was just getting spammed by people doing
liquidations<00:02:24.360><c> and</c><00:02:24.660><c> back</c><00:02:24.900><c> running</c><00:02:25.080><c> oracles</c>

00:02:25.729 --> 00:02:25.739 align:start position:0%
liquidations and back running oracles
 

00:02:25.739 --> 00:02:27.710 align:start position:0%
liquidations and back running oracles
and<00:02:26.040><c> instead</c><00:02:26.520><c> of</c><00:02:26.580><c> normal</c><00:02:26.879><c> users</c><00:02:27.360><c> being</c><00:02:27.540><c> able</c>

00:02:27.710 --> 00:02:27.720 align:start position:0%
and instead of normal users being able
 

00:02:27.720 --> 00:02:29.510 align:start position:0%
and instead of normal users being able
to<00:02:27.780><c> get</c><00:02:27.900><c> their</c><00:02:28.020><c> transactions</c><00:02:28.560><c> in</c><00:02:28.739><c> you'd</c><00:02:29.340><c> have</c>

00:02:29.510 --> 00:02:29.520 align:start position:0%
to get their transactions in you'd have
 

00:02:29.520 --> 00:02:31.430 align:start position:0%
to get their transactions in you'd have
the<00:02:29.819><c> you</c><00:02:30.060><c> know</c><00:02:30.120><c> entire</c><00:02:30.480><c> blocks</c><00:02:30.900><c> filled</c><00:02:31.200><c> with</c>

00:02:31.430 --> 00:02:31.440 align:start position:0%
the you know entire blocks filled with
 

00:02:31.440 --> 00:02:33.710 align:start position:0%
the you know entire blocks filled with
people's<00:02:32.340><c> you</c><00:02:32.580><c> know</c><00:02:32.760><c> spam</c><00:02:33.360><c> background</c>

00:02:33.710 --> 00:02:33.720 align:start position:0%
people's you know spam background
 

00:02:33.720 --> 00:02:35.570 align:start position:0%
people's you know spam background
transactions<00:02:34.260><c> on</c><00:02:34.560><c> the</c><00:02:34.680><c> other</c><00:02:34.800><c> hand</c><00:02:34.980><c> of</c><00:02:35.400><c> course</c>

00:02:35.570 --> 00:02:35.580 align:start position:0%
transactions on the other hand of course
 

00:02:35.580 --> 00:02:38.390 align:start position:0%
transactions on the other hand of course
as<00:02:35.940><c> the</c><00:02:36.360><c> previous</c><00:02:36.540><c> talk</c><00:02:36.900><c> was</c><00:02:37.440><c> focused</c><00:02:37.920><c> on</c><00:02:38.099><c> uh</c>

00:02:38.390 --> 00:02:38.400 align:start position:0%
as the previous talk was focused on uh
 

00:02:38.400 --> 00:02:40.130 align:start position:0%
as the previous talk was focused on uh
there's<00:02:38.940><c> a</c><00:02:39.120><c> lot</c><00:02:39.180><c> of</c><00:02:39.239><c> centralization</c><00:02:39.720><c> risk</c>

00:02:40.130 --> 00:02:40.140 align:start position:0%
there's a lot of centralization risk
 

00:02:40.140 --> 00:02:42.410 align:start position:0%
there's a lot of centralization risk
with<00:02:40.440><c> off-chain</c><00:02:40.920><c> auction</c><00:02:41.160><c> so</c><00:02:41.700><c> let's</c><00:02:41.940><c> you</c><00:02:42.300><c> know</c>

00:02:42.410 --> 00:02:42.420 align:start position:0%
with off-chain auction so let's you know
 

00:02:42.420 --> 00:02:45.050 align:start position:0%
with off-chain auction so let's you know
try<00:02:42.660><c> to</c><00:02:42.840><c> maybe</c><00:02:43.200><c> schematically</c><00:02:43.980><c> look</c><00:02:44.280><c> at</c><00:02:44.459><c> you</c>

00:02:45.050 --> 00:02:45.060 align:start position:0%
try to maybe schematically look at you
 

00:02:45.060 --> 00:02:47.869 align:start position:0%
try to maybe schematically look at you
know<00:02:45.120><c> what</c><00:02:45.420><c> how</c><00:02:45.780><c> Mev</c><00:02:46.260><c> works</c><00:02:46.620><c> we</c><00:02:47.040><c> have</c><00:02:47.280><c> users</c>

00:02:47.869 --> 00:02:47.879 align:start position:0%
know what how Mev works we have users
 

00:02:47.879 --> 00:02:49.670 align:start position:0%
know what how Mev works we have users
who<00:02:48.060><c> submit</c><00:02:48.360><c> transactions</c><00:02:49.019><c> which</c><00:02:49.319><c> are</c><00:02:49.500><c> the</c>

00:02:49.670 --> 00:02:49.680 align:start position:0%
who submit transactions which are the
 

00:02:49.680 --> 00:02:53.030 align:start position:0%
who submit transactions which are the
Deltas<00:02:50.099><c> we</c><00:02:50.879><c> have</c><00:02:51.000><c> a</c><00:02:51.180><c> mempool</c><00:02:51.540><c> uh</c><00:02:52.500><c> the</c><00:02:52.680><c> Searcher</c>

00:02:53.030 --> 00:02:53.040 align:start position:0%
Deltas we have a mempool uh the Searcher
 

00:02:53.040 --> 00:02:55.670 align:start position:0%
Deltas we have a mempool uh the Searcher
has<00:02:53.879><c> sort</c><00:02:54.180><c> of</c><00:02:54.239><c> their</c><00:02:54.420><c> own</c><00:02:54.660><c> view</c><00:02:55.080><c> of</c><00:02:55.560><c> the</c>

00:02:55.670 --> 00:02:55.680 align:start position:0%
has sort of their own view of the
 

00:02:55.680 --> 00:02:57.050 align:start position:0%
has sort of their own view of the
mempool<00:02:56.040><c> and</c><00:02:56.220><c> maybe</c><00:02:56.340><c> they</c><00:02:56.580><c> have</c><00:02:56.700><c> some</c>

00:02:57.050 --> 00:02:57.060 align:start position:0%
mempool and maybe they have some
 

00:02:57.060 --> 00:02:58.970 align:start position:0%
mempool and maybe they have some
transactions<00:02:57.900><c> that</c><00:02:58.080><c> are</c><00:02:58.260><c> directly</c><00:02:58.620><c> given</c><00:02:58.920><c> to</c>

00:02:58.970 --> 00:02:58.980 align:start position:0%
transactions that are directly given to
 

00:02:58.980 --> 00:03:01.430 align:start position:0%
transactions that are directly given to
them<00:02:59.580><c> which</c><00:03:00.420><c> you</c><00:03:00.780><c> know</c><00:03:00.959><c> people</c><00:03:01.080><c> would</c><00:03:01.260><c> call</c>

00:03:01.430 --> 00:03:01.440 align:start position:0%
them which you know people would call
 

00:03:01.440 --> 00:03:03.410 align:start position:0%
them which you know people would call
Private<00:03:01.739><c> order</c><00:03:01.860><c> flow</c><00:03:02.280><c> and</c><00:03:02.700><c> then</c><00:03:02.819><c> the</c><00:03:03.060><c> Searcher</c>

00:03:03.410 --> 00:03:03.420 align:start position:0%
Private order flow and then the Searcher
 

00:03:03.420 --> 00:03:07.190 align:start position:0%
Private order flow and then the Searcher
sends<00:03:03.840><c> their</c><00:03:04.260><c> bundle</c><00:03:05.099><c> which</c><00:03:05.879><c> uh</c><00:03:06.480><c> they're</c>

00:03:07.190 --> 00:03:07.200 align:start position:0%
sends their bundle which uh they're
 

00:03:07.200 --> 00:03:08.809 align:start position:0%
sends their bundle which uh they're
willing<00:03:07.500><c> to</c><00:03:07.560><c> pay</c><00:03:07.680><c> for</c><00:03:07.860><c> to</c><00:03:08.160><c> the</c><00:03:08.340><c> validator</c><00:03:08.640><c> and</c>

00:03:08.809 --> 00:03:08.819 align:start position:0%
willing to pay for to the validator and
 

00:03:08.819 --> 00:03:10.130 align:start position:0%
willing to pay for to the validator and
the<00:03:08.879><c> validator</c><00:03:09.180><c> added</c><00:03:09.540><c> to</c><00:03:09.660><c> the</c><00:03:09.780><c> block</c><00:03:09.840><c> the</c>

00:03:10.130 --> 00:03:10.140 align:start position:0%
the validator added to the block the
 

00:03:10.140 --> 00:03:12.050 align:start position:0%
the validator added to the block the
philosophical<00:03:10.620><c> question</c><00:03:10.920><c> here</c><00:03:11.159><c> though</c><00:03:11.340><c> is</c>

00:03:12.050 --> 00:03:12.060 align:start position:0%
philosophical question here though is
 

00:03:12.060 --> 00:03:14.509 align:start position:0%
philosophical question here though is
how<00:03:12.540><c> do</c><00:03:12.659><c> we</c><00:03:12.720><c> know</c><00:03:12.900><c> value</c><00:03:13.260><c> captured</c><00:03:13.800><c> by</c><00:03:13.920><c> Mev</c><00:03:14.400><c> is</c>

00:03:14.509 --> 00:03:14.519 align:start position:0%
how do we know value captured by Mev is
 

00:03:14.519 --> 00:03:17.449 align:start position:0%
how do we know value captured by Mev is
excessive<00:03:15.120><c> or</c><00:03:15.599><c> in</c><00:03:16.019><c> a</c><00:03:16.200><c> notion</c><00:03:16.560><c> of</c><00:03:16.739><c> excess</c><00:03:17.159><c> you</c>

00:03:17.449 --> 00:03:17.459 align:start position:0%
excessive or in a notion of excess you
 

00:03:17.459 --> 00:03:19.910 align:start position:0%
excessive or in a notion of excess you
know<00:03:17.580><c> in</c><00:03:17.819><c> this</c><00:03:18.420><c> sort</c><00:03:18.900><c> of</c><00:03:19.019><c> first</c><00:03:19.260><c> definition</c><00:03:19.560><c> I</c>

00:03:19.910 --> 00:03:19.920 align:start position:0%
know in this sort of first definition I
 

00:03:19.920 --> 00:03:23.030 align:start position:0%
know in this sort of first definition I
said<00:03:20.040><c> any</c><00:03:20.340><c> excess</c><00:03:20.700><c> value</c><00:03:21.000><c> well</c><00:03:21.379><c> how</c><00:03:22.379><c> excessive</c>

00:03:23.030 --> 00:03:23.040 align:start position:0%
said any excess value well how excessive
 

00:03:23.040 --> 00:03:25.610 align:start position:0%
said any excess value well how excessive
is<00:03:23.280><c> excess</c><00:03:23.760><c> describing</c><00:03:24.480><c> value</c><00:03:24.720><c> Flows</c><00:03:25.140><c> In</c><00:03:25.200><c> Mev</c>

00:03:25.610 --> 00:03:25.620 align:start position:0%
is excess describing value Flows In Mev
 

00:03:25.620 --> 00:03:27.530 align:start position:0%
is excess describing value Flows In Mev
is<00:03:25.739><c> actually</c><00:03:25.860><c> quite</c><00:03:26.099><c> difficult</c><00:03:26.400><c> so</c><00:03:27.060><c> in</c><00:03:27.360><c> in</c>

00:03:27.530 --> 00:03:27.540 align:start position:0%
is actually quite difficult so in in
 

00:03:27.540 --> 00:03:29.330 align:start position:0%
is actually quite difficult so in in
algorithmic<00:03:28.080><c> Game</c><00:03:28.260><c> Theory</c><00:03:28.560><c> you</c><00:03:28.800><c> usually</c><00:03:29.159><c> have</c>

00:03:29.330 --> 00:03:29.340 align:start position:0%
algorithmic Game Theory you usually have
 

00:03:29.340 --> 00:03:31.309 align:start position:0%
algorithmic Game Theory you usually have
two<00:03:29.640><c> main</c><00:03:29.879><c> ways</c><00:03:30.300><c> of</c><00:03:30.480><c> thinking</c><00:03:30.959><c> about</c><00:03:31.080><c> the</c>

00:03:31.309 --> 00:03:31.319 align:start position:0%
two main ways of thinking about the
 

00:03:31.319 --> 00:03:34.130 align:start position:0%
two main ways of thinking about the
world<00:03:31.459><c> one</c><00:03:32.459><c> is</c><00:03:32.819><c> optimizing</c><00:03:33.480><c> social</c><00:03:33.659><c> welfare</c>

00:03:34.130 --> 00:03:34.140 align:start position:0%
world one is optimizing social welfare
 

00:03:34.140 --> 00:03:36.710 align:start position:0%
world one is optimizing social welfare
social<00:03:34.500><c> welfare</c><00:03:34.980><c> means</c><00:03:35.340><c> if</c><00:03:36.000><c> everyone</c><00:03:36.239><c> has</c>

00:03:36.710 --> 00:03:36.720 align:start position:0%
social welfare means if everyone has
 

00:03:36.720 --> 00:03:38.990 align:start position:0%
social welfare means if everyone has
some<00:03:37.200><c> notion</c><00:03:37.500><c> of</c><00:03:37.620><c> utility</c><00:03:37.980><c> some</c><00:03:38.400><c> notion</c><00:03:38.760><c> of</c>

00:03:38.990 --> 00:03:39.000 align:start position:0%
some notion of utility some notion of
 

00:03:39.000 --> 00:03:41.449 align:start position:0%
some notion of utility some notion of
how<00:03:39.659><c> happy</c><00:03:39.780><c> they</c><00:03:40.019><c> are</c><00:03:40.200><c> with</c><00:03:40.319><c> the</c><00:03:40.500><c> world</c><00:03:40.620><c> you</c>

00:03:41.449 --> 00:03:41.459 align:start position:0%
how happy they are with the world you
 

00:03:41.459 --> 00:03:43.369 align:start position:0%
how happy they are with the world you
want<00:03:41.580><c> to</c><00:03:41.760><c> maximize</c><00:03:42.239><c> the</c><00:03:42.540><c> sum</c><00:03:42.720><c> of</c><00:03:43.019><c> everyone's</c>

00:03:43.369 --> 00:03:43.379 align:start position:0%
want to maximize the sum of everyone's
 

00:03:43.379 --> 00:03:46.430 align:start position:0%
want to maximize the sum of everyone's
utilities<00:03:43.799><c> on</c><00:03:44.280><c> the</c><00:03:44.340><c> other</c><00:03:44.400><c> hand</c><00:03:44.580><c> revenue</c><00:03:45.440><c> is</c>

00:03:46.430 --> 00:03:46.440 align:start position:0%
utilities on the other hand revenue is
 

00:03:46.440 --> 00:03:49.250 align:start position:0%
utilities on the other hand revenue is
you<00:03:46.739><c> know</c><00:03:46.799><c> the</c><00:03:47.099><c> the</c><00:03:47.340><c> the</c><00:03:47.580><c> person</c><00:03:48.360><c> selling</c><00:03:48.959><c> the</c>

00:03:49.250 --> 00:03:49.260 align:start position:0%
you know the the the person selling the
 

00:03:49.260 --> 00:03:50.050 align:start position:0%
you know the the the person selling the
good

00:03:50.050 --> 00:03:50.060 align:start position:0%
good
 

00:03:50.060 --> 00:03:52.490 align:start position:0%
good
uh<00:03:51.060><c> you</c><00:03:51.420><c> know</c><00:03:51.540><c> maximizing</c><00:03:52.019><c> how</c><00:03:52.200><c> much</c><00:03:52.319><c> they</c>

00:03:52.490 --> 00:03:52.500 align:start position:0%
uh you know maximizing how much they
 

00:03:52.500 --> 00:03:55.610 align:start position:0%
uh you know maximizing how much they
earn<00:03:52.860><c> and</c><00:03:53.280><c> and</c><00:03:53.459><c> then</c><00:03:53.700><c> in</c><00:03:54.260><c> cryptocurrency</c><00:03:55.260><c> it's</c>

00:03:55.610 --> 00:03:55.620 align:start position:0%
earn and and then in cryptocurrency it's
 

00:03:55.620 --> 00:03:57.470 align:start position:0%
earn and and then in cryptocurrency it's
actually<00:03:55.799><c> interesting</c><00:03:56.400><c> that</c><00:03:56.700><c> you</c><00:03:57.060><c> have</c><00:03:57.420><c> to</c>

00:03:57.470 --> 00:03:57.480 align:start position:0%
actually interesting that you have to
 

00:03:57.480 --> 00:04:00.410 align:start position:0%
actually interesting that you have to
optimize<00:03:57.900><c> both</c><00:03:58.140><c> jointly</c><00:03:58.680><c> so</c><00:03:59.519><c> obviously</c><00:04:00.000><c> user</c>

00:04:00.410 --> 00:04:00.420 align:start position:0%
optimize both jointly so obviously user
 

00:04:00.420 --> 00:04:02.210 align:start position:0%
optimize both jointly so obviously user
welfare<00:04:00.780><c> is</c><00:04:01.019><c> important</c><00:04:01.319><c> for</c><00:04:01.500><c> the</c><00:04:01.799><c> success</c><00:04:02.099><c> of</c>

00:04:02.210 --> 00:04:02.220 align:start position:0%
welfare is important for the success of
 

00:04:02.220 --> 00:04:03.289 align:start position:0%
welfare is important for the success of
any<00:04:02.340><c> network</c>

00:04:03.289 --> 00:04:03.299 align:start position:0%
any network
 

00:04:03.299 --> 00:04:04.850 align:start position:0%
any network
I<00:04:03.780><c> don't</c><00:04:03.840><c> need</c><00:04:03.959><c> to</c><00:04:04.080><c> really</c><00:04:04.200><c> convince</c><00:04:04.560><c> anyone</c>

00:04:04.850 --> 00:04:04.860 align:start position:0%
I don't need to really convince anyone
 

00:04:04.860 --> 00:04:07.190 align:start position:0%
I don't need to really convince anyone
of<00:04:05.040><c> that</c><00:04:05.159><c> but</c><00:04:06.060><c> validator</c><00:04:06.540><c> Revenue</c><00:04:06.959><c> being</c>

00:04:07.190 --> 00:04:07.200 align:start position:0%
of that but validator Revenue being
 

00:04:07.200 --> 00:04:08.630 align:start position:0%
of that but validator Revenue being
optimized<00:04:07.739><c> is</c><00:04:07.860><c> actually</c><00:04:08.099><c> important</c><00:04:08.459><c> for</c>

00:04:08.630 --> 00:04:08.640 align:start position:0%
optimized is actually important for
 

00:04:08.640 --> 00:04:10.550 align:start position:0%
optimized is actually important for
Economic<00:04:09.060><c> Security</c><00:04:09.239><c> if</c><00:04:09.540><c> validators</c><00:04:10.200><c> are</c><00:04:10.439><c> not</c>

00:04:10.550 --> 00:04:10.560 align:start position:0%
Economic Security if validators are not
 

00:04:10.560 --> 00:04:13.369 align:start position:0%
Economic Security if validators are not
making<00:04:10.739><c> sufficient</c><00:04:11.340><c> income</c><00:04:12.180><c> from</c><00:04:12.360><c> it</c><00:04:12.540><c> then</c>

00:04:13.369 --> 00:04:13.379 align:start position:0%
making sufficient income from it then
 

00:04:13.379 --> 00:04:15.470 align:start position:0%
making sufficient income from it then
they're<00:04:13.980><c> unable</c><00:04:14.340><c> to</c><00:04:14.519><c> to</c><00:04:14.760><c> Really</c><00:04:15.000><c> secure</c><00:04:15.299><c> the</c>

00:04:15.470 --> 00:04:15.480 align:start position:0%
they're unable to to Really secure the
 

00:04:15.480 --> 00:04:17.930 align:start position:0%
they're unable to to Really secure the
network<00:04:15.599><c> and</c><00:04:16.440><c> in</c><00:04:16.919><c> decentralized</c><00:04:17.579><c> networks</c>

00:04:17.930 --> 00:04:17.940 align:start position:0%
network and in decentralized networks
 

00:04:17.940 --> 00:04:19.789 align:start position:0%
network and in decentralized networks
versus<00:04:18.060><c> centralized</c><00:04:18.600><c> networks</c><00:04:19.079><c> these</c><00:04:19.680><c> are</c>

00:04:19.789 --> 00:04:19.799 align:start position:0%
versus centralized networks these are
 

00:04:19.799 --> 00:04:21.830 align:start position:0%
versus centralized networks these are
two<00:04:19.919><c> competing</c><00:04:20.340><c> goals</c><00:04:20.639><c> and</c><00:04:20.760><c> I</c><00:04:20.940><c> think</c><00:04:21.060><c> the</c><00:04:21.660><c> one</c>

00:04:21.830 --> 00:04:21.840 align:start position:0%
two competing goals and I think the one
 

00:04:21.840 --> 00:04:23.930 align:start position:0%
two competing goals and I think the one
reason<00:04:22.079><c> there's</c><00:04:22.380><c> a</c><00:04:22.740><c> broad</c><00:04:22.919><c> view</c><00:04:23.280><c> of</c><00:04:23.639><c> how</c>

00:04:23.930 --> 00:04:23.940 align:start position:0%
reason there's a broad view of how
 

00:04:23.940 --> 00:04:25.730 align:start position:0%
reason there's a broad view of how
Theory<00:04:24.419><c> you</c><00:04:24.720><c> know</c><00:04:24.780><c> algorithmic</c><00:04:25.259><c> Game</c><00:04:25.440><c> Theory</c>

00:04:25.730 --> 00:04:25.740 align:start position:0%
Theory you know algorithmic Game Theory
 

00:04:25.740 --> 00:04:28.610 align:start position:0%
Theory you know algorithmic Game Theory
it's<00:04:26.580><c> different</c><00:04:26.940><c> for</c><00:04:27.240><c> crypto</c><00:04:27.660><c> is</c><00:04:28.259><c> that</c><00:04:28.440><c> you</c>

00:04:28.610 --> 00:04:28.620 align:start position:0%
it's different for crypto is that you
 

00:04:28.620 --> 00:04:30.890 align:start position:0%
it's different for crypto is that you
have<00:04:28.740><c> to</c><00:04:28.919><c> sort</c><00:04:29.160><c> of</c><00:04:29.280><c> balance</c><00:04:30.060><c> these</c><00:04:30.360><c> two</c><00:04:30.479><c> goals</c>

00:04:30.890 --> 00:04:30.900 align:start position:0%
have to sort of balance these two goals
 

00:04:30.900 --> 00:04:32.870 align:start position:0%
have to sort of balance these two goals
instead<00:04:31.259><c> of</c><00:04:31.440><c> trying</c><00:04:32.040><c> to</c><00:04:32.160><c> optimize</c><00:04:32.520><c> one</c><00:04:32.759><c> of</c>

00:04:32.870 --> 00:04:32.880 align:start position:0%
instead of trying to optimize one of
 

00:04:32.880 --> 00:04:33.890 align:start position:0%
instead of trying to optimize one of
them

00:04:33.890 --> 00:04:33.900 align:start position:0%
them
 

00:04:33.900 --> 00:04:36.350 align:start position:0%
them
so<00:04:34.560><c> what</c><00:04:34.919><c> pieces</c><00:04:35.220><c> are</c><00:04:35.400><c> sort</c><00:04:35.580><c> of</c><00:04:35.699><c> missing</c><00:04:36.000><c> so</c>

00:04:36.350 --> 00:04:36.360 align:start position:0%
so what pieces are sort of missing so
 

00:04:36.360 --> 00:04:38.210 align:start position:0%
so what pieces are sort of missing so
how<00:04:36.600><c> would</c><00:04:36.780><c> we</c><00:04:36.960><c> kind</c><00:04:37.199><c> of</c><00:04:37.259><c> describe</c><00:04:37.680><c> welfare</c><00:04:38.040><c> as</c>

00:04:38.210 --> 00:04:38.220 align:start position:0%
how would we kind of describe welfare as
 

00:04:38.220 --> 00:04:40.790 align:start position:0%
how would we kind of describe welfare as
how<00:04:38.460><c> would</c><00:04:38.580><c> we</c><00:04:38.759><c> describe</c><00:04:39.180><c> Revenue</c>

00:04:40.790 --> 00:04:40.800 align:start position:0%
how would we describe Revenue
 

00:04:40.800 --> 00:04:43.129 align:start position:0%
how would we describe Revenue
um<00:04:40.860><c> you</c><00:04:41.160><c> know</c><00:04:41.220><c> one</c><00:04:41.820><c> thing</c><00:04:42.000><c> is</c><00:04:42.360><c> understanding</c>

00:04:43.129 --> 00:04:43.139 align:start position:0%
um you know one thing is understanding
 

00:04:43.139 --> 00:04:45.170 align:start position:0%
um you know one thing is understanding
the<00:04:43.380><c> user's</c><00:04:43.740><c> utilities</c><00:04:44.160><c> what</c><00:04:44.699><c> is</c><00:04:44.820><c> the</c><00:04:44.940><c> user</c>

00:04:45.170 --> 00:04:45.180 align:start position:0%
the user's utilities what is the user
 

00:04:45.180 --> 00:04:46.550 align:start position:0%
the user's utilities what is the user
getting<00:04:45.360><c> out</c><00:04:45.600><c> what</c><00:04:45.900><c> is</c><00:04:46.020><c> their</c><00:04:46.199><c> notion</c>

00:04:46.550 --> 00:04:46.560 align:start position:0%
getting out what is their notion
 

00:04:46.560 --> 00:04:47.990 align:start position:0%
getting out what is their notion
individual<00:04:46.919><c> notion</c><00:04:47.220><c> of</c><00:04:47.340><c> value</c><00:04:47.520><c> and</c><00:04:47.699><c> that</c><00:04:47.880><c> can</c>

00:04:47.990 --> 00:04:48.000 align:start position:0%
individual notion of value and that can
 

00:04:48.000 --> 00:04:50.030 align:start position:0%
individual notion of value and that can
vary<00:04:48.240><c> over</c><00:04:48.540><c> the</c><00:04:48.900><c> entire</c><00:04:49.139><c> network</c><00:04:49.320><c> the</c><00:04:49.979><c> other</c>

00:04:50.030 --> 00:04:50.040 align:start position:0%
vary over the entire network the other
 

00:04:50.040 --> 00:04:52.129 align:start position:0%
vary over the entire network the other
thing<00:04:50.280><c> is</c><00:04:50.460><c> some</c><00:04:50.639><c> notion</c><00:04:50.940><c> of</c><00:04:51.180><c> transaction</c><00:04:51.720><c> fees</c>

00:04:52.129 --> 00:04:52.139 align:start position:0%
thing is some notion of transaction fees
 

00:04:52.139 --> 00:04:53.810 align:start position:0%
thing is some notion of transaction fees
and<00:04:52.259><c> payments</c><00:04:52.680><c> that</c><00:04:52.979><c> you</c><00:04:53.460><c> know</c><00:04:53.520><c> the</c>

00:04:53.810 --> 00:04:53.820 align:start position:0%
and payments that you know the
 

00:04:53.820 --> 00:04:56.150 align:start position:0%
and payments that you know the
distribution<00:04:54.240><c> of</c><00:04:54.660><c> payment</c><00:04:55.080><c> sizes</c><00:04:55.560><c> that</c><00:04:55.860><c> users</c>

00:04:56.150 --> 00:04:56.160 align:start position:0%
distribution of payment sizes that users
 

00:04:56.160 --> 00:04:58.370 align:start position:0%
distribution of payment sizes that users
are<00:04:56.280><c> willing</c><00:04:56.580><c> to</c><00:04:56.699><c> handle</c><00:04:57.240><c> and</c><00:04:57.840><c> the</c><00:04:58.020><c> last</c><00:04:58.139><c> thing</c>

00:04:58.370 --> 00:04:58.380 align:start position:0%
are willing to handle and the last thing
 

00:04:58.380 --> 00:05:01.370 align:start position:0%
are willing to handle and the last thing
is<00:04:58.740><c> an</c><00:04:59.699><c> understanding</c><00:05:00.120><c> of</c><00:05:00.240><c> how</c><00:05:00.600><c> an</c><00:05:00.840><c> Auctioneer</c>

00:05:01.370 --> 00:05:01.380 align:start position:0%
is an understanding of how an Auctioneer
 

00:05:01.380 --> 00:05:04.909 align:start position:0%
is an understanding of how an Auctioneer
so<00:05:01.860><c> in</c><00:05:02.340><c> flashbots</c><00:05:02.940><c> or</c><00:05:03.360><c> you</c><00:05:03.720><c> know</c><00:05:03.840><c> in</c><00:05:03.900><c> PBS</c><00:05:04.320><c> how</c>

00:05:04.909 --> 00:05:04.919 align:start position:0%
so in flashbots or you know in PBS how
 

00:05:04.919 --> 00:05:07.070 align:start position:0%
so in flashbots or you know in PBS how
they<00:05:05.100><c> allocate</c><00:05:05.460><c> block</c><00:05:05.639><c> space</c><00:05:05.880><c> is</c><00:05:06.180><c> to</c><00:05:06.720><c> users</c>

00:05:07.070 --> 00:05:07.080 align:start position:0%
they allocate block space is to users
 

00:05:07.080 --> 00:05:09.110 align:start position:0%
they allocate block space is to users
and<00:05:07.440><c> that</c><00:05:07.740><c> that</c><00:05:08.220><c> last</c><00:05:08.520><c> part</c><00:05:08.699><c> is</c><00:05:08.880><c> actually</c>

00:05:09.110 --> 00:05:09.120 align:start position:0%
and that that last part is actually
 

00:05:09.120 --> 00:05:11.570 align:start position:0%
and that that last part is actually
quite<00:05:09.479><c> complicated</c><00:05:09.960><c> and</c><00:05:10.440><c> these</c><00:05:11.220><c> three</c><00:05:11.340><c> things</c>

00:05:11.570 --> 00:05:11.580 align:start position:0%
quite complicated and these three things
 

00:05:11.580 --> 00:05:13.129 align:start position:0%
quite complicated and these three things
are<00:05:11.759><c> quite</c><00:05:11.940><c> entangled</c><00:05:12.419><c> when</c><00:05:12.600><c> you</c><00:05:12.780><c> want</c><00:05:12.840><c> to</c><00:05:13.020><c> try</c>

00:05:13.129 --> 00:05:13.139 align:start position:0%
are quite entangled when you want to try
 

00:05:13.139 --> 00:05:14.450 align:start position:0%
are quite entangled when you want to try
to<00:05:13.259><c> write</c><00:05:13.380><c> a</c><00:05:13.500><c> mathematical</c><00:05:13.919><c> theory</c><00:05:14.220><c> for</c><00:05:14.340><c> me</c>

00:05:14.450 --> 00:05:14.460 align:start position:0%
to write a mathematical theory for me
 

00:05:14.460 --> 00:05:17.749 align:start position:0%
to write a mathematical theory for me
being<00:05:15.180><c> and</c><00:05:16.020><c> these</c><00:05:16.500><c> sort</c><00:05:16.680><c> of</c><00:05:16.800><c> things</c><00:05:17.400><c> actually</c>

00:05:17.749 --> 00:05:17.759 align:start position:0%
being and these sort of things actually
 

00:05:17.759 --> 00:05:19.670 align:start position:0%
being and these sort of things actually
depend<00:05:18.240><c> a</c><00:05:18.479><c> lot</c><00:05:18.600><c> on</c><00:05:18.900><c> the</c><00:05:19.020><c> application</c><00:05:19.380><c> right</c>

00:05:19.670 --> 00:05:19.680 align:start position:0%
depend a lot on the application right
 

00:05:19.680 --> 00:05:22.790 align:start position:0%
depend a lot on the application right
the<00:05:20.040><c> user's</c><00:05:20.460><c> utility</c><00:05:20.820><c> for</c><00:05:21.300><c> minting</c><00:05:22.020><c> in</c><00:05:22.199><c> nft</c><00:05:22.500><c> is</c>

00:05:22.790 --> 00:05:22.800 align:start position:0%
the user's utility for minting in nft is
 

00:05:22.800 --> 00:05:24.850 align:start position:0%
the user's utility for minting in nft is
extremely<00:05:23.280><c> different</c><00:05:23.520><c> for</c><00:05:23.940><c> a</c><00:05:24.060><c> user's</c><00:05:24.479><c> utility</c>

00:05:24.850 --> 00:05:24.860 align:start position:0%
extremely different for a user's utility
 

00:05:24.860 --> 00:05:28.550 align:start position:0%
extremely different for a user's utility
for<00:05:25.860><c> borrowing</c><00:05:26.759><c> uh</c><00:05:27.660><c> against</c><00:05:27.840><c> some</c><00:05:28.139><c> collateral</c>

00:05:28.550 --> 00:05:28.560 align:start position:0%
for borrowing uh against some collateral
 

00:05:28.560 --> 00:05:30.950 align:start position:0%
for borrowing uh against some collateral
uh<00:05:29.160><c> and</c><00:05:29.460><c> inevitably</c><00:05:30.300><c> that</c><00:05:30.479><c> means</c><00:05:30.720><c> that</c><00:05:30.840><c> the</c>

00:05:30.950 --> 00:05:30.960 align:start position:0%
uh and inevitably that means that the
 

00:05:30.960 --> 00:05:32.510 align:start position:0%
uh and inevitably that means that the
allocation<00:05:31.380><c> mechanism</c><00:05:31.800><c> should</c><00:05:32.100><c> somehow</c><00:05:32.340><c> be</c>

00:05:32.510 --> 00:05:32.520 align:start position:0%
allocation mechanism should somehow be
 

00:05:32.520 --> 00:05:34.610 align:start position:0%
allocation mechanism should somehow be
tied<00:05:32.699><c> to</c><00:05:32.880><c> that</c><00:05:33.000><c> okay</c><00:05:33.479><c> so</c><00:05:33.840><c> let's</c><00:05:33.960><c> let's</c><00:05:34.199><c> try</c><00:05:34.440><c> to</c>

00:05:34.610 --> 00:05:34.620 align:start position:0%
tied to that okay so let's let's try to
 

00:05:34.620 --> 00:05:37.010 align:start position:0%
tied to that okay so let's let's try to
do<00:05:34.979><c> kind</c><00:05:35.280><c> of</c><00:05:35.340><c> like</c><00:05:35.520><c> the</c><00:05:35.820><c> eli5</c><00:05:36.419><c> simple</c><00:05:36.720><c> version</c>

00:05:37.010 --> 00:05:37.020 align:start position:0%
do kind of like the eli5 simple version
 

00:05:37.020 --> 00:05:38.029 align:start position:0%
do kind of like the eli5 simple version
of<00:05:37.259><c> those</c>

00:05:38.029 --> 00:05:38.039 align:start position:0%
of those
 

00:05:38.039 --> 00:05:41.090 align:start position:0%
of those
which<00:05:38.460><c> is</c><00:05:38.699><c> uh</c><00:05:39.240><c> you</c><00:05:39.840><c> know</c><00:05:39.900><c> we</c><00:05:40.320><c> have</c><00:05:40.440><c> a</c><00:05:40.680><c> notion</c><00:05:40.979><c> of</c>

00:05:41.090 --> 00:05:41.100 align:start position:0%
which is uh you know we have a notion of
 

00:05:41.100 --> 00:05:43.670 align:start position:0%
which is uh you know we have a notion of
block<00:05:41.280><c> space</c><00:05:41.580><c> which</c><00:05:42.539><c> is</c><00:05:42.720><c> sort</c><00:05:43.020><c> of</c><00:05:43.080><c> a</c><00:05:43.199><c> notion</c><00:05:43.560><c> of</c>

00:05:43.670 --> 00:05:43.680 align:start position:0%
block space which is sort of a notion of
 

00:05:43.680 --> 00:05:46.249 align:start position:0%
block space which is sort of a notion of
Max<00:05:44.160><c> number</c><00:05:44.520><c> of</c><00:05:44.699><c> transactions</c><00:05:45.300><c> or</c><00:05:45.539><c> slots</c><00:05:45.960><c> or</c>

00:05:46.249 --> 00:05:46.259 align:start position:0%
Max number of transactions or slots or
 

00:05:46.259 --> 00:05:48.529 align:start position:0%
Max number of transactions or slots or
size<00:05:46.560><c> or</c><00:05:46.860><c> gas</c><00:05:47.100><c> you</c><00:05:47.400><c> can</c><00:05:47.520><c> choose</c><00:05:47.820><c> a</c><00:05:47.940><c> unit</c><00:05:48.060><c> but</c>

00:05:48.529 --> 00:05:48.539 align:start position:0%
size or gas you can choose a unit but
 

00:05:48.539 --> 00:05:50.570 align:start position:0%
size or gas you can choose a unit but
for<00:05:49.080><c> Simplicity</c><00:05:49.500><c> just</c><00:05:49.919><c> assume</c><00:05:50.280><c> they're</c><00:05:50.400><c> sort</c>

00:05:50.570 --> 00:05:50.580 align:start position:0%
for Simplicity just assume they're sort
 

00:05:50.580 --> 00:05:53.029 align:start position:0%
for Simplicity just assume they're sort
of<00:05:50.639><c> fixed</c><00:05:51.120><c> number</c><00:05:51.240><c> of</c><00:05:51.419><c> units</c><00:05:52.139><c> there's</c><00:05:52.680><c> sort</c><00:05:52.919><c> of</c>

00:05:53.029 --> 00:05:53.039 align:start position:0%
of fixed number of units there's sort of
 

00:05:53.039 --> 00:05:55.070 align:start position:0%
of fixed number of units there's sort of
a<00:05:53.160><c> notion</c><00:05:53.460><c> of</c><00:05:53.639><c> a</c><00:05:53.820><c> binary</c><00:05:54.240><c> allocation</c><00:05:54.720><c> to</c><00:05:54.960><c> a</c>

00:05:55.070 --> 00:05:55.080 align:start position:0%
a notion of a binary allocation to a
 

00:05:55.080 --> 00:05:57.050 align:start position:0%
a notion of a binary allocation to a
user<00:05:55.320><c> of</c><00:05:55.440><c> whether</c><00:05:55.620><c> a</c><00:05:55.919><c> particular</c><00:05:56.220><c> user</c><00:05:56.639><c> gets</c><00:05:56.940><c> a</c>

00:05:57.050 --> 00:05:57.060 align:start position:0%
user of whether a particular user gets a
 

00:05:57.060 --> 00:05:58.969 align:start position:0%
user of whether a particular user gets a
particular<00:05:57.360><c> slot</c><00:05:57.780><c> the</c><00:05:58.259><c> users</c><00:05:58.560><c> have</c><00:05:58.800><c> the</c>

00:05:58.969 --> 00:05:58.979 align:start position:0%
particular slot the users have the
 

00:05:58.979 --> 00:06:01.550 align:start position:0%
particular slot the users have the
utility<00:05:59.220><c> functions</c><00:06:00.180><c> I'm</c><00:06:00.600><c> unspecifying</c><00:06:01.380><c> the</c>

00:06:01.550 --> 00:06:01.560 align:start position:0%
utility functions I'm unspecifying the
 

00:06:01.560 --> 00:06:03.170 align:start position:0%
utility functions I'm unspecifying the
domain<00:06:01.860><c> and</c><00:06:02.039><c> range</c><00:06:02.280><c> because</c><00:06:02.520><c> of</c><00:06:02.759><c> course</c><00:06:02.880><c> it's</c>

00:06:03.170 --> 00:06:03.180 align:start position:0%
domain and range because of course it's
 

00:06:03.180 --> 00:06:05.029 align:start position:0%
domain and range because of course it's
actually<00:06:03.479><c> quite</c><00:06:03.780><c> complicated</c><00:06:04.320><c> in</c><00:06:04.560><c> a</c><00:06:04.680><c> world</c><00:06:04.800><c> of</c>

00:06:05.029 --> 00:06:05.039 align:start position:0%
actually quite complicated in a world of
 

00:06:05.039 --> 00:06:06.969 align:start position:0%
actually quite complicated in a world of
cross-chain<00:06:05.460><c> bridging</c>

00:06:06.969 --> 00:06:06.979 align:start position:0%
cross-chain bridging
 

00:06:06.979 --> 00:06:10.790 align:start position:0%
cross-chain bridging
and<00:06:07.979><c> we</c><00:06:08.820><c> see</c><00:06:09.000><c> here</c><00:06:09.240><c> that</c><00:06:09.600><c> social</c><00:06:10.080><c> welfare</c><00:06:10.620><c> is</c>

00:06:10.790 --> 00:06:10.800 align:start position:0%
and we see here that social welfare is
 

00:06:10.800 --> 00:06:13.610 align:start position:0%
and we see here that social welfare is
defined<00:06:11.100><c> as</c><00:06:11.280><c> sort</c><00:06:11.460><c> of</c><00:06:11.580><c> the</c><00:06:12.120><c> expected</c><00:06:12.720><c> total</c>

00:06:13.610 --> 00:06:13.620 align:start position:0%
defined as sort of the expected total
 

00:06:13.620 --> 00:06:15.409 align:start position:0%
defined as sort of the expected total
utility<00:06:14.039><c> of</c><00:06:14.280><c> all</c><00:06:14.460><c> the</c><00:06:14.580><c> users</c><00:06:14.820><c> given</c><00:06:15.240><c> an</c>

00:06:15.409 --> 00:06:15.419 align:start position:0%
utility of all the users given an
 

00:06:15.419 --> 00:06:18.409 align:start position:0%
utility of all the users given an
allocation<00:06:15.780><c> so</c><00:06:16.020><c> these</c><00:06:16.320><c> X</c><00:06:16.560><c> variables</c><00:06:17.460><c> are</c>

00:06:18.409 --> 00:06:18.419 align:start position:0%
allocation so these X variables are
 

00:06:18.419 --> 00:06:20.510 align:start position:0%
allocation so these X variables are
effectively<00:06:19.020><c> whether</c><00:06:19.500><c> that</c><00:06:19.800><c> slot</c><00:06:20.160><c> is</c><00:06:20.280><c> given</c>

00:06:20.510 --> 00:06:20.520 align:start position:0%
effectively whether that slot is given
 

00:06:20.520 --> 00:06:22.070 align:start position:0%
effectively whether that slot is given
to<00:06:20.639><c> a</c><00:06:20.759><c> certain</c><00:06:20.880><c> person</c><00:06:21.060><c> then</c><00:06:21.360><c> this</c><00:06:21.600><c> is</c><00:06:21.720><c> sort</c><00:06:21.960><c> of</c>

00:06:22.070 --> 00:06:22.080 align:start position:0%
to a certain person then this is sort of
 

00:06:22.080 --> 00:06:24.350 align:start position:0%
to a certain person then this is sort of
measuring<00:06:22.740><c> their</c><00:06:22.860><c> sort</c><00:06:23.100><c> of</c><00:06:23.220><c> net</c><00:06:23.520><c> happiness</c>

00:06:24.350 --> 00:06:24.360 align:start position:0%
measuring their sort of net happiness
 

00:06:24.360 --> 00:06:25.670 align:start position:0%
measuring their sort of net happiness
let's<00:06:24.780><c> say</c>

00:06:25.670 --> 00:06:25.680 align:start position:0%
let's say
 

00:06:25.680 --> 00:06:28.370 align:start position:0%
let's say
uh<00:06:26.520><c> Revenue</c><00:06:26.880><c> however</c><00:06:27.300><c> is</c><00:06:27.600><c> just</c><00:06:27.780><c> the</c><00:06:28.020><c> expected</c>

00:06:28.370 --> 00:06:28.380 align:start position:0%
uh Revenue however is just the expected
 

00:06:28.380 --> 00:06:29.930 align:start position:0%
uh Revenue however is just the expected
value<00:06:28.500><c> of</c><00:06:28.680><c> the</c><00:06:28.800><c> payments</c><00:06:29.160><c> and</c><00:06:29.340><c> notice</c><00:06:29.639><c> these</c>

00:06:29.930 --> 00:06:29.940 align:start position:0%
value of the payments and notice these
 

00:06:29.940 --> 00:06:31.370 align:start position:0%
value of the payments and notice these
are<00:06:30.000><c> quite</c><00:06:30.180><c> different</c>

00:06:31.370 --> 00:06:31.380 align:start position:0%
are quite different
 

00:06:31.380 --> 00:06:33.909 align:start position:0%
are quite different
um<00:06:31.440><c> in</c><00:06:31.680><c> in</c><00:06:31.860><c> particular</c><00:06:32.400><c> the</c><00:06:32.940><c> social</c><00:06:33.120><c> welfare</c>

00:06:33.909 --> 00:06:33.919 align:start position:0%
um in in particular the social welfare
 

00:06:33.919 --> 00:06:36.409 align:start position:0%
um in in particular the social welfare
includes<00:06:34.919><c> the</c><00:06:35.100><c> utility</c><00:06:35.460><c> of</c><00:06:35.819><c> the</c><00:06:35.940><c> auctioneer</c>

00:06:36.409 --> 00:06:36.419 align:start position:0%
includes the utility of the auctioneer
 

00:06:36.419 --> 00:06:39.710 align:start position:0%
includes the utility of the auctioneer
which<00:06:37.199><c> means</c><00:06:37.699><c> that</c><00:06:38.699><c> all</c><00:06:39.000><c> of</c><00:06:39.060><c> the</c><00:06:39.240><c> payments</c>

00:06:39.710 --> 00:06:39.720 align:start position:0%
which means that all of the payments
 

00:06:39.720 --> 00:06:42.050 align:start position:0%
which means that all of the payments
that<00:06:40.080><c> the</c><00:06:40.199><c> the</c><00:06:40.380><c> users</c><00:06:40.860><c> send</c><00:06:41.100><c> are</c><00:06:41.460><c> subtracted</c>

00:06:42.050 --> 00:06:42.060 align:start position:0%
that the the users send are subtracted
 

00:06:42.060 --> 00:06:44.809 align:start position:0%
that the the users send are subtracted
or<00:06:42.660><c> sorry</c><00:06:42.960><c> our</c><00:06:43.259><c> negative</c><00:06:44.039><c> terms</c><00:06:44.520><c> for</c><00:06:44.699><c> the</c>

00:06:44.809 --> 00:06:44.819 align:start position:0%
or sorry our negative terms for the
 

00:06:44.819 --> 00:06:46.909 align:start position:0%
or sorry our negative terms for the
bidders<00:06:45.240><c> and</c><00:06:45.720><c> it's</c><00:06:45.900><c> a</c><00:06:46.080><c> positive</c><00:06:46.380><c> term</c><00:06:46.560><c> for</c><00:06:46.860><c> the</c>

00:06:46.909 --> 00:06:46.919 align:start position:0%
bidders and it's a positive term for the
 

00:06:46.919 --> 00:06:49.370 align:start position:0%
bidders and it's a positive term for the
auctioneer<00:06:47.400><c> so</c><00:06:47.819><c> the</c><00:06:48.000><c> payments</c><00:06:48.419><c> cancel</c><00:06:48.660><c> out</c><00:06:48.960><c> in</c>

00:06:49.370 --> 00:06:49.380 align:start position:0%
auctioneer so the payments cancel out in
 

00:06:49.380 --> 00:06:51.110 align:start position:0%
auctioneer so the payments cancel out in
social<00:06:49.500><c> welfare</c><00:06:49.919><c> so</c><00:06:50.100><c> you</c><00:06:50.280><c> have</c><00:06:50.400><c> no</c><00:06:50.639><c> dependence</c>

00:06:51.110 --> 00:06:51.120 align:start position:0%
social welfare so you have no dependence
 

00:06:51.120 --> 00:06:53.450 align:start position:0%
social welfare so you have no dependence
on<00:06:51.300><c> payments</c><00:06:51.780><c> explicitly</c><00:06:52.500><c> whereas</c><00:06:53.400><c> in</c>

00:06:53.450 --> 00:06:53.460 align:start position:0%
on payments explicitly whereas in
 

00:06:53.460 --> 00:06:54.770 align:start position:0%
on payments explicitly whereas in
revenue<00:06:53.699><c> of</c><00:06:53.880><c> course</c><00:06:54.000><c> you</c><00:06:54.120><c> you</c><00:06:54.360><c> depend</c><00:06:54.600><c> on</c>

00:06:54.770 --> 00:06:54.780 align:start position:0%
revenue of course you you depend on
 

00:06:54.780 --> 00:06:57.409 align:start position:0%
revenue of course you you depend on
payments<00:06:55.199><c> so</c><00:06:55.740><c> you</c><00:06:56.220><c> know</c><00:06:56.280><c> if</c><00:06:56.639><c> we</c><00:06:56.759><c> wanted</c><00:06:57.000><c> to</c><00:06:57.240><c> try</c>

00:06:57.409 --> 00:06:57.419 align:start position:0%
payments so you know if we wanted to try
 

00:06:57.419 --> 00:06:58.909 align:start position:0%
payments so you know if we wanted to try
to<00:06:57.600><c> formulate</c><00:06:57.960><c> what</c><00:06:58.199><c> is</c><00:06:58.380><c> an</c><00:06:58.560><c> economic</c>

00:06:58.909 --> 00:06:58.919 align:start position:0%
to formulate what is an economic
 

00:06:58.919 --> 00:07:01.010 align:start position:0%
to formulate what is an economic
equilibria<00:06:59.460><c> for</c><00:06:59.639><c> the</c><00:06:59.819><c> system</c><00:07:00.000><c> you</c><00:07:00.720><c> might</c><00:07:00.840><c> say</c>

00:07:01.010 --> 00:07:01.020 align:start position:0%
equilibria for the system you might say
 

00:07:01.020 --> 00:07:04.909 align:start position:0%
equilibria for the system you might say
okay<00:07:01.319><c> well</c><00:07:01.620><c> let's</c><00:07:01.919><c> try</c><00:07:02.220><c> to</c><00:07:02.400><c> find</c><00:07:03.139><c> joint</c><00:07:04.139><c> up</c><00:07:04.560><c> you</c>

00:07:04.909 --> 00:07:04.919 align:start position:0%
okay well let's try to find joint up you
 

00:07:04.919 --> 00:07:07.129 align:start position:0%
okay well let's try to find joint up you
know<00:07:05.039><c> Maxima</c><00:07:05.639><c> of</c><00:07:06.120><c> the</c><00:07:06.300><c> social</c><00:07:06.419><c> welfare</c><00:07:06.960><c> and</c>

00:07:07.129 --> 00:07:07.139 align:start position:0%
know Maxima of the social welfare and
 

00:07:07.139 --> 00:07:08.870 align:start position:0%
know Maxima of the social welfare and
revenue<00:07:07.500><c> functions</c>

00:07:08.870 --> 00:07:08.880 align:start position:0%
revenue functions
 

00:07:08.880 --> 00:07:10.249 align:start position:0%
revenue functions
however

00:07:10.249 --> 00:07:10.259 align:start position:0%
however
 

00:07:10.259 --> 00:07:13.010 align:start position:0%
however
given<00:07:11.100><c> an</c><00:07:11.220><c> allocation</c><00:07:11.699><c> that</c><00:07:12.479><c> optimizes</c>

00:07:13.010 --> 00:07:13.020 align:start position:0%
given an allocation that optimizes
 

00:07:13.020 --> 00:07:14.990 align:start position:0%
given an allocation that optimizes
social<00:07:13.199><c> welfare</c><00:07:13.620><c> it</c><00:07:14.100><c> implies</c><00:07:14.460><c> a</c><00:07:14.699><c> set</c><00:07:14.880><c> of</c>

00:07:14.990 --> 00:07:15.000 align:start position:0%
social welfare it implies a set of
 

00:07:15.000 --> 00:07:17.150 align:start position:0%
social welfare it implies a set of
payments<00:07:15.479><c> and</c><00:07:16.080><c> it</c><00:07:16.259><c> can</c><00:07:16.380><c> be</c><00:07:16.500><c> true</c><00:07:16.680><c> that</c><00:07:16.979><c> the</c>

00:07:17.150 --> 00:07:17.160 align:start position:0%
payments and it can be true that the
 

00:07:17.160 --> 00:07:19.790 align:start position:0%
payments and it can be true that the
payments<00:07:17.580><c> that</c><00:07:17.759><c> you</c><00:07:17.940><c> get</c><00:07:18.199><c> from</c><00:07:19.199><c> optimal</c>

00:07:19.790 --> 00:07:19.800 align:start position:0%
payments that you get from optimal
 

00:07:19.800 --> 00:07:22.249 align:start position:0%
payments that you get from optimal
social<00:07:19.979><c> welfare</c><00:07:20.460><c> are</c><00:07:21.300><c> very</c><00:07:21.599><c> far</c><00:07:21.780><c> from</c><00:07:22.080><c> the</c>

00:07:22.249 --> 00:07:22.259 align:start position:0%
social welfare are very far from the
 

00:07:22.259 --> 00:07:24.050 align:start position:0%
social welfare are very far from the
payments<00:07:22.680><c> that</c><00:07:22.919><c> you</c><00:07:23.039><c> you</c><00:07:23.220><c> get</c><00:07:23.460><c> from</c><00:07:23.639><c> optimal</c>

00:07:24.050 --> 00:07:24.060 align:start position:0%
payments that you you get from optimal
 

00:07:24.060 --> 00:07:25.550 align:start position:0%
payments that you you get from optimal
Revenue<00:07:24.300><c> right</c><00:07:24.660><c> that</c><00:07:24.960><c> there's</c><00:07:25.199><c> some</c>

00:07:25.550 --> 00:07:25.560 align:start position:0%
Revenue right that there's some
 

00:07:25.560 --> 00:07:27.110 align:start position:0%
Revenue right that there's some
intuition<00:07:25.919><c> to</c><00:07:26.099><c> that</c><00:07:26.160><c> right</c><00:07:26.340><c> like</c><00:07:26.520><c> if</c><00:07:26.759><c> if</c>

00:07:27.110 --> 00:07:27.120 align:start position:0%
intuition to that right like if if
 

00:07:27.120 --> 00:07:29.450 align:start position:0%
intuition to that right like if if
flashbots<00:07:27.780><c> just</c><00:07:28.020><c> basically</c><00:07:28.500><c> gave</c><00:07:29.160><c> every</c>

00:07:29.450 --> 00:07:29.460 align:start position:0%
flashbots just basically gave every
 

00:07:29.460 --> 00:07:32.210 align:start position:0%
flashbots just basically gave every
bundle<00:07:29.880><c> for</c><00:07:30.240><c> free</c><00:07:30.440><c> obviously</c><00:07:31.440><c> the</c><00:07:31.740><c> there's</c><00:07:32.039><c> a</c>

00:07:32.210 --> 00:07:32.220 align:start position:0%
bundle for free obviously the there's a
 

00:07:32.220 --> 00:07:34.969 align:start position:0%
bundle for free obviously the there's a
lot<00:07:32.340><c> of</c><00:07:32.580><c> user</c><00:07:33.360><c> gains</c><00:07:34.020><c> but</c><00:07:34.259><c> like</c><00:07:34.560><c> you</c><00:07:34.680><c> know</c><00:07:34.860><c> the</c>

00:07:34.969 --> 00:07:34.979 align:start position:0%
lot of user gains but like you know the
 

00:07:34.979 --> 00:07:36.650 align:start position:0%
lot of user gains but like you know the
auctioneer<00:07:35.520><c> is</c><00:07:35.580><c> pretty</c><00:07:35.759><c> pissed</c><00:07:36.120><c> aka</c><00:07:36.539><c> the</c>

00:07:36.650 --> 00:07:36.660 align:start position:0%
auctioneer is pretty pissed aka the
 

00:07:36.660 --> 00:07:38.809 align:start position:0%
auctioneer is pretty pissed aka the
validator<00:07:37.080><c> slash</c><00:07:37.500><c> minors</c>

00:07:38.809 --> 00:07:38.819 align:start position:0%
validator slash minors
 

00:07:38.819 --> 00:07:41.510 align:start position:0%
validator slash minors
and<00:07:39.419><c> this</c><00:07:39.599><c> happens</c><00:07:39.840><c> all</c><00:07:40.319><c> the</c><00:07:40.440><c> time</c><00:07:40.500><c> in</c><00:07:40.680><c> mud</c><00:07:41.039><c> the</c>

00:07:41.510 --> 00:07:41.520 align:start position:0%
and this happens all the time in mud the
 

00:07:41.520 --> 00:07:43.129 align:start position:0%
and this happens all the time in mud the
the<00:07:41.699><c> idea</c><00:07:42.000><c> that</c><00:07:42.180><c> the</c><00:07:42.419><c> optimal</c><00:07:42.840><c> revenue</c>

00:07:43.129 --> 00:07:43.139 align:start position:0%
the idea that the optimal revenue
 

00:07:43.139 --> 00:07:45.110 align:start position:0%
the idea that the optimal revenue
equilibria<00:07:43.919><c> and</c><00:07:44.160><c> the</c><00:07:44.520><c> optimal</c><00:07:45.000><c> social</c>

00:07:45.110 --> 00:07:45.120 align:start position:0%
equilibria and the optimal social
 

00:07:45.120 --> 00:07:47.510 align:start position:0%
equilibria and the optimal social
welfare<00:07:45.680><c> equilibria</c><00:07:46.680><c> are</c><00:07:46.800><c> sort</c><00:07:47.160><c> of</c><00:07:47.280><c> disjoint</c>

00:07:47.510 --> 00:07:47.520 align:start position:0%
welfare equilibria are sort of disjoint
 

00:07:47.520 --> 00:07:51.170 align:start position:0%
welfare equilibria are sort of disjoint
so<00:07:48.120><c> you</c><00:07:48.960><c> know</c><00:07:49.020><c> the</c><00:07:49.440><c> the</c><00:07:49.620><c> name</c><00:07:49.919><c> cost</c><00:07:50.340><c> of</c><00:07:50.639><c> fee</c><00:07:51.000><c> or</c>

00:07:51.170 --> 00:07:51.180 align:start position:0%
so you know the the name cost of fee or
 

00:07:51.180 --> 00:07:53.809 align:start position:0%
so you know the the name cost of fee or
cost<00:07:51.419><c> of</c><00:07:51.599><c> feudalism</c><00:07:52.020><c> is</c><00:07:52.319><c> really</c><00:07:52.500><c> a</c><00:07:52.740><c> pun</c><00:07:53.160><c> on</c><00:07:53.460><c> the</c>

00:07:53.809 --> 00:07:53.819 align:start position:0%
cost of feudalism is really a pun on the
 

00:07:53.819 --> 00:07:55.490 align:start position:0%
cost of feudalism is really a pun on the
concept<00:07:54.120><c> of</c><00:07:54.300><c> the</c><00:07:54.539><c> price</c><00:07:54.599><c> of</c><00:07:54.780><c> Anarchy</c><00:07:55.199><c> which</c><00:07:55.380><c> is</c>

00:07:55.490 --> 00:07:55.500 align:start position:0%
concept of the price of Anarchy which is
 

00:07:55.500 --> 00:07:57.350 align:start position:0%
concept of the price of Anarchy which is
sort<00:07:55.680><c> of</c><00:07:55.740><c> a</c><00:07:55.919><c> common</c><00:07:56.400><c> Concept</c><00:07:56.759><c> in</c><00:07:56.940><c> algorithmic</c>

00:07:57.350 --> 00:07:57.360 align:start position:0%
sort of a common Concept in algorithmic
 

00:07:57.360 --> 00:07:59.450 align:start position:0%
sort of a common Concept in algorithmic
gain<00:07:57.539><c> Theory</c><00:07:57.840><c> roughly</c><00:07:58.680><c> speaking</c><00:07:59.160><c> you</c><00:07:59.400><c> can</c>

00:07:59.450 --> 00:07:59.460 align:start position:0%
gain Theory roughly speaking you can
 

00:07:59.460 --> 00:08:01.249 align:start position:0%
gain Theory roughly speaking you can
think<00:07:59.580><c> of</c><00:07:59.699><c> the</c><00:07:59.819><c> price</c><00:08:00.000><c> of</c><00:08:00.120><c> Anarchy</c><00:08:00.599><c> as</c>

00:08:01.249 --> 00:08:01.259 align:start position:0%
think of the price of Anarchy as
 

00:08:01.259 --> 00:08:03.050 align:start position:0%
think of the price of Anarchy as
if<00:08:01.440><c> I</c><00:08:01.919><c> take</c><00:08:02.099><c> if</c><00:08:02.340><c> I</c><00:08:02.520><c> have</c><00:08:02.520><c> a</c><00:08:02.639><c> set</c><00:08:02.759><c> of</c><00:08:02.940><c> many</c>

00:08:03.050 --> 00:08:03.060 align:start position:0%
if I take if I have a set of many
 

00:08:03.060 --> 00:08:05.629 align:start position:0%
if I take if I have a set of many
equilibria<00:08:03.720><c> I</c><00:08:04.380><c> want</c><00:08:04.500><c> to</c><00:08:04.620><c> look</c><00:08:04.800><c> at</c><00:08:04.919><c> the</c><00:08:05.220><c> ratio</c>

00:08:05.629 --> 00:08:05.639 align:start position:0%
equilibria I want to look at the ratio
 

00:08:05.639 --> 00:08:07.850 align:start position:0%
equilibria I want to look at the ratio
of<00:08:06.060><c> the</c><00:08:06.300><c> worst</c><00:08:06.660><c> case</c><00:08:06.840><c> behavior</c><00:08:07.620><c> of</c><00:08:07.740><c> an</c>

00:08:07.850 --> 00:08:07.860 align:start position:0%
of the worst case behavior of an
 

00:08:07.860 --> 00:08:10.010 align:start position:0%
of the worst case behavior of an
equilibria<00:08:08.400><c> to</c><00:08:08.880><c> the</c><00:08:09.060><c> best</c><00:08:09.240><c> case</c><00:08:09.479><c> Behavior</c>

00:08:10.010 --> 00:08:10.020 align:start position:0%
equilibria to the best case Behavior
 

00:08:10.020 --> 00:08:11.990 align:start position:0%
equilibria to the best case Behavior
it's<00:08:10.199><c> an</c><00:08:10.380><c> approximation</c><00:08:10.919><c> ratio</c>

00:08:11.990 --> 00:08:12.000 align:start position:0%
it's an approximation ratio
 

00:08:12.000 --> 00:08:14.270 align:start position:0%
it's an approximation ratio
and<00:08:12.539><c> so</c><00:08:12.720><c> what</c><00:08:13.020><c> this</c><00:08:13.500><c> for</c><00:08:13.800><c> instance</c><00:08:14.039><c> this</c>

00:08:14.270 --> 00:08:14.280 align:start position:0%
and so what this for instance this
 

00:08:14.280 --> 00:08:16.610 align:start position:0%
and so what this for instance this
formula<00:08:14.580><c> says</c><00:08:14.880><c> is</c><00:08:15.000><c> what's</c><00:08:15.660><c> the</c><00:08:16.020><c> worst</c><00:08:16.380><c> case</c>

00:08:16.610 --> 00:08:16.620 align:start position:0%
formula says is what's the worst case
 

00:08:16.620 --> 00:08:19.369 align:start position:0%
formula says is what's the worst case
that<00:08:17.160><c> the</c><00:08:17.580><c> equilibria</c><00:08:18.300><c> the</c><00:08:18.539><c> payments</c><00:08:19.020><c> earned</c>

00:08:19.369 --> 00:08:19.379 align:start position:0%
that the equilibria the payments earned
 

00:08:19.379 --> 00:08:21.350 align:start position:0%
that the equilibria the payments earned
by<00:08:19.500><c> the</c><00:08:19.680><c> validator</c><00:08:20.099><c> deviate</c><00:08:20.879><c> from</c><00:08:21.240><c> the</c>

00:08:21.350 --> 00:08:21.360 align:start position:0%
by the validator deviate from the
 

00:08:21.360 --> 00:08:23.510 align:start position:0%
by the validator deviate from the
payments<00:08:21.780><c> earned</c><00:08:22.139><c> at</c><00:08:22.319><c> optimal</c><00:08:22.740><c> welfare</c><00:08:23.039><c> and</c>

00:08:23.510 --> 00:08:23.520 align:start position:0%
payments earned at optimal welfare and
 

00:08:23.520 --> 00:08:25.010 align:start position:0%
payments earned at optimal welfare and
what's<00:08:23.639><c> the</c><00:08:23.940><c> best</c><00:08:24.120><c> case</c><00:08:24.360><c> and</c><00:08:24.660><c> what's</c><00:08:24.780><c> the</c>

00:08:25.010 --> 00:08:25.020 align:start position:0%
what's the best case and what's the
 

00:08:25.020 --> 00:08:26.390 align:start position:0%
what's the best case and what's the
ratio<00:08:25.319><c> of</c><00:08:25.500><c> those</c>

00:08:26.390 --> 00:08:26.400 align:start position:0%
ratio of those
 

00:08:26.400 --> 00:08:28.010 align:start position:0%
ratio of those
and<00:08:26.759><c> you</c><00:08:26.879><c> could</c><00:08:27.000><c> basically</c><00:08:27.300><c> think</c><00:08:27.539><c> of</c><00:08:27.720><c> this</c><00:08:27.840><c> as</c>

00:08:28.010 --> 00:08:28.020 align:start position:0%
and you could basically think of this as
 

00:08:28.020 --> 00:08:30.469 align:start position:0%
and you could basically think of this as
if<00:08:28.319><c> this</c><00:08:28.500><c> is</c><00:08:28.620><c> really</c><00:08:28.860><c> large</c><00:08:29.340><c> or</c><00:08:29.879><c> depends</c><00:08:30.300><c> on</c>

00:08:30.469 --> 00:08:30.479 align:start position:0%
if this is really large or depends on
 

00:08:30.479 --> 00:08:31.909 align:start position:0%
if this is really large or depends on
the<00:08:30.599><c> number</c><00:08:30.780><c> of</c><00:08:30.960><c> transactions</c><00:08:31.440><c> or</c><00:08:31.620><c> users</c>

00:08:31.909 --> 00:08:31.919 align:start position:0%
the number of transactions or users
 

00:08:31.919 --> 00:08:35.510 align:start position:0%
the number of transactions or users
that's<00:08:32.159><c> really</c><00:08:32.399><c> bad</c><00:08:32.700><c> and</c><00:08:33.659><c> so</c><00:08:33.899><c> you</c><00:08:34.860><c> know</c><00:08:34.919><c> uh</c>

00:08:35.510 --> 00:08:35.520 align:start position:0%
that's really bad and so you know uh
 

00:08:35.520 --> 00:08:37.730 align:start position:0%
that's really bad and so you know uh
tongue-in-cheek<00:08:36.360><c> uh</c><00:08:37.080><c> you</c><00:08:37.380><c> know</c><00:08:37.440><c> of</c><00:08:37.620><c> course</c>

00:08:37.730 --> 00:08:37.740 align:start position:0%
tongue-in-cheek uh you know of course
 

00:08:37.740 --> 00:08:39.889 align:start position:0%
tongue-in-cheek uh you know of course
nothing<00:08:38.039><c> in</c><00:08:38.339><c> real</c><00:08:38.640><c> life</c><00:08:38.760><c> is</c><00:08:38.940><c> asymptotic</c><00:08:39.599><c> but</c>

00:08:39.889 --> 00:08:39.899 align:start position:0%
nothing in real life is asymptotic but
 

00:08:39.899 --> 00:08:41.750 align:start position:0%
nothing in real life is asymptotic but
you<00:08:40.140><c> know</c><00:08:40.260><c> I</c><00:08:40.380><c> I</c><00:08:40.560><c> Feel</c><00:08:40.860><c> Like</c><00:08:41.039><c> These</c><00:08:41.580><c> are</c><00:08:41.700><c> good</c>

00:08:41.750 --> 00:08:41.760 align:start position:0%
you know I I Feel Like These are good
 

00:08:41.760 --> 00:08:44.690 align:start position:0%
you know I I Feel Like These are good
heuristics<00:08:42.300><c> which</c><00:08:43.080><c> is</c><00:08:43.339><c> constant</c><00:08:44.339><c> price</c><00:08:44.520><c> of</c>

00:08:44.690 --> 00:08:44.700 align:start position:0%
heuristics which is constant price of
 

00:08:44.700 --> 00:08:47.150 align:start position:0%
heuristics which is constant price of
Anarchy<00:08:45.180><c> is</c><00:08:45.480><c> really</c><00:08:45.660><c> good</c><00:08:45.899><c> it</c><00:08:46.620><c> means</c><00:08:46.860><c> that</c>

00:08:47.150 --> 00:08:47.160 align:start position:0%
Anarchy is really good it means that
 

00:08:47.160 --> 00:08:49.610 align:start position:0%
Anarchy is really good it means that
even<00:08:48.000><c> if</c><00:08:48.240><c> you</c><00:08:48.300><c> get</c><00:08:48.480><c> to</c><00:08:48.600><c> a</c><00:08:48.779><c> shitty</c><00:08:49.019><c> equilibria</c>

00:08:49.610 --> 00:08:49.620 align:start position:0%
even if you get to a shitty equilibria
 

00:08:49.620 --> 00:08:52.430 align:start position:0%
even if you get to a shitty equilibria
uh<00:08:50.459><c> it's</c><00:08:50.700><c> not</c><00:08:50.880><c> that</c><00:08:51.060><c> much</c><00:08:51.360><c> worse</c><00:08:51.779><c> it's</c><00:08:52.320><c> not</c>

00:08:52.430 --> 00:08:52.440 align:start position:0%
uh it's not that much worse it's not
 

00:08:52.440 --> 00:08:54.590 align:start position:0%
uh it's not that much worse it's not
that<00:08:52.680><c> much</c><00:08:52.920><c> uh</c><00:08:53.700><c> worse</c><00:08:54.120><c> than</c><00:08:54.300><c> the</c><00:08:54.540><c> best</c>

00:08:54.590 --> 00:08:54.600 align:start position:0%
that much uh worse than the best
 

00:08:54.600 --> 00:08:57.170 align:start position:0%
that much uh worse than the best
equilibria<00:08:55.260><c> if</c><00:08:55.800><c> the</c><00:08:55.980><c> price</c><00:08:56.100><c> of</c><00:08:56.220><c> Anarchy</c><00:08:56.640><c> is</c><00:08:56.820><c> is</c>

00:08:57.170 --> 00:08:57.180 align:start position:0%
equilibria if the price of Anarchy is is
 

00:08:57.180 --> 00:09:00.170 align:start position:0%
equilibria if the price of Anarchy is is
weekly<00:08:57.839><c> growing</c><00:08:58.500><c> uh</c><00:08:59.100><c> so</c><00:08:59.220><c> little</c><00:08:59.399><c> o</c><00:08:59.640><c> of</c><00:08:59.820><c> n</c><00:08:59.940><c> so</c>

00:09:00.170 --> 00:09:00.180 align:start position:0%
weekly growing uh so little o of n so
 

00:09:00.180 --> 00:09:01.550 align:start position:0%
weekly growing uh so little o of n so
like<00:09:00.360><c> maybe</c><00:09:00.540><c> it's</c><00:09:00.720><c> logarithmic</c><00:09:01.320><c> in</c><00:09:01.440><c> the</c>

00:09:01.550 --> 00:09:01.560 align:start position:0%
like maybe it's logarithmic in the
 

00:09:01.560 --> 00:09:03.410 align:start position:0%
like maybe it's logarithmic in the
number<00:09:01.680><c> of</c><00:09:01.800><c> users</c><00:09:02.279><c> or</c><00:09:02.459><c> slots</c><00:09:02.820><c> maybe</c><00:09:03.120><c> it's</c>

00:09:03.410 --> 00:09:03.420 align:start position:0%
number of users or slots maybe it's
 

00:09:03.420 --> 00:09:05.090 align:start position:0%
number of users or slots maybe it's
square<00:09:03.720><c> root</c><00:09:04.019><c> of</c><00:09:04.140><c> the</c><00:09:04.260><c> number</c><00:09:04.440><c> of</c><00:09:04.560><c> user</c><00:09:04.860><c> slots</c>

00:09:05.090 --> 00:09:05.100 align:start position:0%
square root of the number of user slots
 

00:09:05.100 --> 00:09:09.050 align:start position:0%
square root of the number of user slots
that's<00:09:05.700><c> okay</c><00:09:05.940><c> it's</c><00:09:06.779><c> you</c><00:09:07.019><c> can</c><00:09:07.140><c> deal</c><00:09:07.260><c> with</c><00:09:07.500><c> that</c>

00:09:09.050 --> 00:09:09.060 align:start position:0%
that's okay it's you can deal with that
 

00:09:09.060 --> 00:09:11.329 align:start position:0%
that's okay it's you can deal with that
um<00:09:09.120><c> and</c><00:09:09.480><c> if</c><00:09:09.660><c> the</c><00:09:09.899><c> price</c><00:09:09.959><c> of</c><00:09:10.140><c> Anarchy</c><00:09:10.620><c> is</c><00:09:10.920><c> linear</c>

00:09:11.329 --> 00:09:11.339 align:start position:0%
um and if the price of Anarchy is linear
 

00:09:11.339 --> 00:09:13.310 align:start position:0%
um and if the price of Anarchy is linear
in<00:09:11.580><c> the</c><00:09:11.700><c> number</c><00:09:11.820><c> of</c><00:09:11.940><c> users</c><00:09:12.300><c> that's</c><00:09:12.959><c> horrible</c>

00:09:13.310 --> 00:09:13.320 align:start position:0%
in the number of users that's horrible
 

00:09:13.320 --> 00:09:16.250 align:start position:0%
in the number of users that's horrible
that<00:09:13.920><c> that</c><00:09:14.100><c> basically</c><00:09:14.580><c> means</c><00:09:15.180><c> that</c><00:09:15.420><c> the</c><00:09:16.080><c> more</c>

00:09:16.250 --> 00:09:16.260 align:start position:0%
that that basically means that the more
 

00:09:16.260 --> 00:09:18.650 align:start position:0%
that that basically means that the more
users<00:09:16.620><c> join</c><00:09:17.040><c> the</c><00:09:17.160><c> system</c><00:09:17.339><c> the</c><00:09:18.240><c> worse</c><00:09:18.480><c> the</c>

00:09:18.650 --> 00:09:18.660 align:start position:0%
users join the system the worse the
 

00:09:18.660 --> 00:09:20.690 align:start position:0%
users join the system the worse the
equilibria<00:09:19.260><c> is</c><00:09:19.440><c> for</c><00:09:19.620><c> everyone</c><00:09:19.860><c> which</c><00:09:20.339><c> is</c><00:09:20.459><c> like</c>

00:09:20.690 --> 00:09:20.700 align:start position:0%
equilibria is for everyone which is like
 

00:09:20.700 --> 00:09:22.190 align:start position:0%
equilibria is for everyone which is like
the<00:09:20.880><c> opposite</c><00:09:21.240><c> of</c><00:09:21.360><c> a</c><00:09:21.480><c> network</c><00:09:21.660><c> effect</c><00:09:21.899><c> it's</c>

00:09:22.190 --> 00:09:22.200 align:start position:0%
the opposite of a network effect it's
 

00:09:22.200 --> 00:09:24.590 align:start position:0%
the opposite of a network effect it's
like<00:09:22.320><c> the</c><00:09:22.500><c> anti-network</c><00:09:23.279><c> effect</c><00:09:23.459><c> right</c>

00:09:24.590 --> 00:09:24.600 align:start position:0%
like the anti-network effect right
 

00:09:24.600 --> 00:09:26.810 align:start position:0%
like the anti-network effect right
no<00:09:25.080><c> one</c><00:09:25.260><c> wants</c><00:09:25.500><c> that</c><00:09:26.100><c> um</c><00:09:26.160><c> and</c><00:09:26.399><c> the</c><00:09:26.519><c> interesting</c>

00:09:26.810 --> 00:09:26.820 align:start position:0%
no one wants that um and the interesting
 

00:09:26.820 --> 00:09:28.430 align:start position:0%
no one wants that um and the interesting
thing<00:09:27.000><c> is</c><00:09:27.240><c> that</c><00:09:27.420><c> this</c><00:09:27.660><c> quantity</c><00:09:28.080><c> if</c><00:09:28.200><c> you</c><00:09:28.320><c> try</c>

00:09:28.430 --> 00:09:28.440 align:start position:0%
thing is that this quantity if you try
 

00:09:28.440 --> 00:09:30.170 align:start position:0%
thing is that this quantity if you try
to<00:09:28.560><c> write</c><00:09:28.680><c> it</c><00:09:28.800><c> out</c><00:09:28.920><c> depends</c><00:09:29.519><c> a</c><00:09:29.640><c> lot</c><00:09:29.820><c> on</c><00:09:30.060><c> your</c>

00:09:30.170 --> 00:09:30.180 align:start position:0%
to write it out depends a lot on your
 

00:09:30.180 --> 00:09:32.690 align:start position:0%
to write it out depends a lot on your
choice<00:09:30.480><c> of</c><00:09:31.019><c> how</c><00:09:31.320><c> you</c><00:09:31.560><c> what</c><00:09:32.220><c> applications</c>

00:09:32.690 --> 00:09:32.700 align:start position:0%
choice of how you what applications
 

00:09:32.700 --> 00:09:34.730 align:start position:0%
choice of how you what applications
you're<00:09:33.000><c> modeling</c><00:09:33.420><c> because</c><00:09:33.899><c> to</c><00:09:34.260><c> compute</c><00:09:34.560><c> the</c>

00:09:34.730 --> 00:09:34.740 align:start position:0%
you're modeling because to compute the
 

00:09:34.740 --> 00:09:36.410 align:start position:0%
you're modeling because to compute the
prices<00:09:34.920><c> you</c><00:09:35.339><c> need</c><00:09:35.459><c> to</c><00:09:35.640><c> sort</c><00:09:35.760><c> of</c><00:09:35.880><c> know</c><00:09:36.060><c> these</c>

00:09:36.410 --> 00:09:36.420 align:start position:0%
prices you need to sort of know these
 

00:09:36.420 --> 00:09:38.990 align:start position:0%
prices you need to sort of know these
utilities<00:09:36.779><c> of</c><00:09:37.019><c> the</c><00:09:37.140><c> user</c><00:09:37.459><c> and</c><00:09:38.459><c> that</c><00:09:38.760><c> of</c><00:09:38.880><c> course</c>

00:09:38.990 --> 00:09:39.000 align:start position:0%
utilities of the user and that of course
 

00:09:39.000 --> 00:09:40.550 align:start position:0%
utilities of the user and that of course
depends<00:09:39.240><c> not</c><00:09:39.600><c> to</c><00:09:39.779><c> keep</c><00:09:39.899><c> belaboring</c><00:09:40.440><c> that</c>

00:09:40.550 --> 00:09:40.560 align:start position:0%
depends not to keep belaboring that
 

00:09:40.560 --> 00:09:41.930 align:start position:0%
depends not to keep belaboring that
point<00:09:40.680><c> but</c><00:09:40.800><c> I</c><00:09:40.980><c> think</c><00:09:41.100><c> the</c><00:09:41.339><c> the</c><00:09:41.580><c> one</c><00:09:41.820><c> of</c><00:09:41.940><c> the</c>

00:09:41.930 --> 00:09:41.940 align:start position:0%
point but I think the the one of the
 

00:09:41.940 --> 00:09:45.050 align:start position:0%
point but I think the the one of the
reasons<00:09:42.240><c> Mev</c><00:09:42.720><c> has</c><00:09:42.959><c> this</c><00:09:43.260><c> you</c><00:09:44.040><c> know</c><00:09:44.160><c> both</c><00:09:44.760><c> meme</c>

00:09:45.050 --> 00:09:45.060 align:start position:0%
reasons Mev has this you know both meme
 

00:09:45.060 --> 00:09:47.090 align:start position:0%
reasons Mev has this you know both meme
ability<00:09:45.540><c> and</c><00:09:45.959><c> inability</c><00:09:46.440><c> for</c><00:09:46.680><c> anyone</c><00:09:46.920><c> to</c>

00:09:47.090 --> 00:09:47.100 align:start position:0%
ability and inability for anyone to
 

00:09:47.100 --> 00:09:48.769 align:start position:0%
ability and inability for anyone to
write<00:09:47.220><c> down</c><00:09:47.399><c> equations</c><00:09:47.760><c> for</c><00:09:48.120><c> it</c><00:09:48.240><c> is</c><00:09:48.480><c> because</c>

00:09:48.769 --> 00:09:48.779 align:start position:0%
write down equations for it is because
 

00:09:48.779 --> 00:09:50.690 align:start position:0%
write down equations for it is because
it's<00:09:49.320><c> so</c><00:09:49.500><c> dependent</c><00:09:49.980><c> on</c><00:09:50.160><c> the</c><00:09:50.339><c> application</c>

00:09:50.690 --> 00:09:50.700 align:start position:0%
it's so dependent on the application
 

00:09:50.700 --> 00:09:52.730 align:start position:0%
it's so dependent on the application
which<00:09:51.000><c> is</c><00:09:51.120><c> something</c><00:09:51.360><c> I</c><00:09:51.660><c> think</c><00:09:51.779><c> you</c><00:09:52.380><c> know</c><00:09:52.500><c> the</c>

00:09:52.730 --> 00:09:52.740 align:start position:0%
which is something I think you know the
 

00:09:52.740 --> 00:09:54.050 align:start position:0%
which is something I think you know the
early<00:09:52.920><c> designers</c><00:09:53.339><c> of</c><00:09:53.519><c> cryptocurrency</c>

00:09:54.050 --> 00:09:54.060 align:start position:0%
early designers of cryptocurrency
 

00:09:54.060 --> 00:09:55.550 align:start position:0%
early designers of cryptocurrency
networks<00:09:54.420><c> did</c><00:09:54.600><c> not</c>

00:09:55.550 --> 00:09:55.560 align:start position:0%
networks did not
 

00:09:55.560 --> 00:09:58.190 align:start position:0%
networks did not
you<00:09:56.040><c> know</c><00:09:56.160><c> Divine</c><00:09:56.519><c> at</c><00:09:56.700><c> that</c><00:09:56.820><c> time</c><00:09:57.000><c> so</c><00:09:57.600><c> let's</c><00:09:57.899><c> go</c>

00:09:58.190 --> 00:09:58.200 align:start position:0%
you know Divine at that time so let's go
 

00:09:58.200 --> 00:10:00.710 align:start position:0%
you know Divine at that time so let's go
through<00:09:58.500><c> an</c><00:09:58.800><c> example</c><00:09:59.100><c> a</c><00:09:59.700><c> stylized</c><00:10:00.180><c> example</c><00:10:00.540><c> of</c>

00:10:00.710 --> 00:10:00.720 align:start position:0%
through an example a stylized example of
 

00:10:00.720 --> 00:10:02.150 align:start position:0%
through an example a stylized example of
kind<00:10:01.140><c> of</c><00:10:01.200><c> what</c><00:10:01.380><c> this</c><00:10:01.500><c> looks</c><00:10:01.740><c> like</c><00:10:01.800><c> how</c><00:10:02.040><c> would</c>

00:10:02.150 --> 00:10:02.160 align:start position:0%
kind of what this looks like how would
 

00:10:02.160 --> 00:10:05.030 align:start position:0%
kind of what this looks like how would
you<00:10:02.279><c> analyze</c><00:10:02.700><c> this</c><00:10:02.820><c> for</c><00:10:03.180><c> amms</c>

00:10:05.030 --> 00:10:05.040 align:start position:0%
you analyze this for amms
 

00:10:05.040 --> 00:10:07.610 align:start position:0%
you analyze this for amms
um<00:10:05.100><c> there's</c><00:10:05.459><c> a</c><00:10:05.640><c> very</c><00:10:05.760><c> famous</c><00:10:05.880><c> Paradox</c><00:10:06.620><c> in</c>

00:10:07.610 --> 00:10:07.620 align:start position:0%
um there's a very famous Paradox in
 

00:10:07.620 --> 00:10:09.230 align:start position:0%
um there's a very famous Paradox in
algorithmic<00:10:08.160><c> Game</c><00:10:08.279><c> Theory</c><00:10:08.580><c> called</c><00:10:08.820><c> braces</c>

00:10:09.230 --> 00:10:09.240 align:start position:0%
algorithmic Game Theory called braces
 

00:10:09.240 --> 00:10:10.910 align:start position:0%
algorithmic Game Theory called braces
Paradox<00:10:09.660><c> and</c><00:10:09.779><c> braces</c><00:10:10.080><c> Paradox</c><00:10:10.500><c> is</c><00:10:10.740><c> really</c>

00:10:10.910 --> 00:10:10.920 align:start position:0%
Paradox and braces Paradox is really
 

00:10:10.920 --> 00:10:14.269 align:start position:0%
Paradox and braces Paradox is really
about<00:10:11.160><c> how</c><00:10:12.120><c> traffic</c><00:10:12.420><c> flows</c><00:10:13.080><c> on</c><00:10:13.440><c> a</c><00:10:13.560><c> network</c><00:10:13.740><c> so</c>

00:10:14.269 --> 00:10:14.279 align:start position:0%
about how traffic flows on a network so
 

00:10:14.279 --> 00:10:17.269 align:start position:0%
about how traffic flows on a network so
we<00:10:14.640><c> have</c><00:10:14.820><c> this</c><00:10:15.000><c> network</c><00:10:15.240><c> on</c><00:10:15.959><c> the</c><00:10:16.080><c> left</c><00:10:16.200><c> and</c><00:10:17.160><c> we</c>

00:10:17.269 --> 00:10:17.279 align:start position:0%
we have this network on the left and we
 

00:10:17.279 --> 00:10:19.250 align:start position:0%
we have this network on the left and we
have<00:10:17.459><c> a</c><00:10:17.519><c> source</c><00:10:17.940><c> City</c><00:10:18.120><c> s</c><00:10:18.600><c> we</c><00:10:19.019><c> have</c><00:10:19.200><c> a</c>

00:10:19.250 --> 00:10:19.260 align:start position:0%
have a source City s we have a
 

00:10:19.260 --> 00:10:20.990 align:start position:0%
have a source City s we have a
destination<00:10:19.740><c> city</c><00:10:20.040><c> d</c>

00:10:20.990 --> 00:10:21.000 align:start position:0%
destination city d
 

00:10:21.000 --> 00:10:23.690 align:start position:0%
destination city d
and<00:10:21.899><c> imagine</c><00:10:22.680><c> that</c><00:10:23.040><c> there's</c><00:10:23.220><c> a</c><00:10:23.399><c> bunch</c><00:10:23.519><c> of</c>

00:10:23.690 --> 00:10:23.700 align:start position:0%
and imagine that there's a bunch of
 

00:10:23.700 --> 00:10:25.730 align:start position:0%
and imagine that there's a bunch of
traffic<00:10:24.120><c> that</c><00:10:24.540><c> needs</c><00:10:24.779><c> to</c><00:10:24.899><c> go</c><00:10:25.019><c> from</c><00:10:25.260><c> source</c><00:10:25.620><c> to</c>

00:10:25.730 --> 00:10:25.740 align:start position:0%
traffic that needs to go from source to
 

00:10:25.740 --> 00:10:28.910 align:start position:0%
traffic that needs to go from source to
destination<00:10:26.220><c> each</c><00:10:27.000><c> Edge</c><00:10:27.300><c> that</c><00:10:27.839><c> it</c><00:10:28.080><c> takes</c><00:10:28.260><c> is</c><00:10:28.740><c> a</c>

00:10:28.910 --> 00:10:28.920 align:start position:0%
destination each Edge that it takes is a
 

00:10:28.920 --> 00:10:30.949 align:start position:0%
destination each Edge that it takes is a
latency<00:10:29.220><c> and</c><00:10:29.519><c> so</c><00:10:29.700><c> when</c><00:10:30.060><c> you</c><00:10:30.180><c> see</c><00:10:30.360><c> a</c><00:10:30.480><c> latency</c><00:10:30.720><c> of</c>

00:10:30.949 --> 00:10:30.959 align:start position:0%
latency and so when you see a latency of
 

00:10:30.959 --> 00:10:33.530 align:start position:0%
latency and so when you see a latency of
one<00:10:31.080><c> that's</c><00:10:31.380><c> sort</c><00:10:31.620><c> of</c><00:10:31.740><c> like</c><00:10:31.920><c> a</c><00:10:32.640><c> a</c><00:10:32.820><c> link</c><00:10:33.240><c> that</c>

00:10:33.530 --> 00:10:33.540 align:start position:0%
one that's sort of like a a link that
 

00:10:33.540 --> 00:10:35.930 align:start position:0%
one that's sort of like a a link that
can<00:10:33.660><c> take</c><00:10:33.839><c> arbitrary</c><00:10:34.260><c> capacity</c><00:10:34.800><c> it</c><00:10:35.100><c> takes</c><00:10:35.700><c> the</c>

00:10:35.930 --> 00:10:35.940 align:start position:0%
can take arbitrary capacity it takes the
 

00:10:35.940 --> 00:10:38.449 align:start position:0%
can take arbitrary capacity it takes the
same<00:10:36.060><c> amount</c><00:10:36.360><c> of</c><00:10:36.480><c> time</c><00:10:36.660><c> for</c><00:10:37.080><c> everyone</c><00:10:37.320><c> to</c><00:10:38.279><c> to</c>

00:10:38.449 --> 00:10:38.459 align:start position:0%
same amount of time for everyone to to
 

00:10:38.459 --> 00:10:41.750 align:start position:0%
same amount of time for everyone to to
cross<00:10:38.700><c> that</c><00:10:38.880><c> link</c><00:10:39.540><c> when</c><00:10:40.140><c> you</c><00:10:40.320><c> see</c><00:10:40.500><c> a</c><00:10:40.680><c> link</c><00:10:40.920><c> of</c><00:10:41.399><c> X</c>

00:10:41.750 --> 00:10:41.760 align:start position:0%
cross that link when you see a link of X
 

00:10:41.760 --> 00:10:43.670 align:start position:0%
cross that link when you see a link of X
it's<00:10:42.360><c> dependent</c><00:10:42.779><c> on</c><00:10:42.899><c> the</c><00:10:43.019><c> amount</c><00:10:43.200><c> of</c><00:10:43.320><c> flow</c><00:10:43.560><c> in</c>

00:10:43.670 --> 00:10:43.680 align:start position:0%
it's dependent on the amount of flow in
 

00:10:43.680 --> 00:10:45.470 align:start position:0%
it's dependent on the amount of flow in
that<00:10:43.860><c> Network</c><00:10:44.100><c> so</c><00:10:44.579><c> you</c><00:10:45.000><c> could</c><00:10:45.120><c> basically</c>

00:10:45.470 --> 00:10:45.480 align:start position:0%
that Network so you could basically
 

00:10:45.480 --> 00:10:49.370 align:start position:0%
that Network so you could basically
imagine<00:10:46.019><c> that</c><00:10:46.560><c> say</c><00:10:47.040><c> we</c><00:10:47.279><c> have</c><00:10:47.459><c> 100</c><00:10:47.700><c> cars</c>

00:10:49.370 --> 00:10:49.380 align:start position:0%
imagine that say we have 100 cars
 

00:10:49.380 --> 00:10:51.829 align:start position:0%
imagine that say we have 100 cars
um<00:10:49.440><c> if</c><00:10:50.040><c> 100</c><00:10:50.220><c> cars</c><00:10:50.640><c> all</c><00:10:50.820><c> go</c><00:10:51.060><c> down</c><00:10:51.240><c> the</c><00:10:51.420><c> route</c><00:10:51.540><c> X</c>

00:10:51.829 --> 00:10:51.839 align:start position:0%
um if 100 cars all go down the route X
 

00:10:51.839 --> 00:10:53.509 align:start position:0%
um if 100 cars all go down the route X
then<00:10:52.140><c> it's</c><00:10:52.320><c> proportional</c><00:10:52.860><c> to</c><00:10:53.100><c> the</c><00:10:53.220><c> number</c><00:10:53.339><c> of</c>

00:10:53.509 --> 00:10:53.519 align:start position:0%
then it's proportional to the number of
 

00:10:53.519 --> 00:10:55.190 align:start position:0%
then it's proportional to the number of
cars<00:10:53.880><c> that</c><00:10:54.000><c> are</c><00:10:54.120><c> going</c>

00:10:55.190 --> 00:10:55.200 align:start position:0%
cars that are going
 

00:10:55.200 --> 00:10:57.170 align:start position:0%
cars that are going
on<00:10:55.320><c> there</c><00:10:55.620><c> and</c><00:10:55.860><c> so</c><00:10:56.040><c> what</c><00:10:56.579><c> you</c><00:10:56.700><c> can</c><00:10:56.820><c> do</c><00:10:56.880><c> is</c><00:10:57.000><c> you</c>

00:10:57.170 --> 00:10:57.180 align:start position:0%
on there and so what you can do is you
 

00:10:57.180 --> 00:10:59.690 align:start position:0%
on there and so what you can do is you
can<00:10:57.300><c> say</c><00:10:57.420><c> Hey</c><00:10:57.600><c> what</c><00:10:57.959><c> if</c><00:10:58.140><c> everyone</c><00:10:58.440><c> is</c><00:10:59.220><c> selfish</c>

00:10:59.690 --> 00:10:59.700 align:start position:0%
can say Hey what if everyone is selfish
 

00:10:59.700 --> 00:11:02.030 align:start position:0%
can say Hey what if everyone is selfish
or<00:10:59.880><c> greedy</c><00:11:00.300><c> they're</c><00:11:00.540><c> not</c><00:11:00.720><c> cooperating</c><00:11:01.380><c> they</c>

00:11:02.030 --> 00:11:02.040 align:start position:0%
or greedy they're not cooperating they
 

00:11:02.040 --> 00:11:03.470 align:start position:0%
or greedy they're not cooperating they
don't<00:11:02.220><c> have</c><00:11:02.279><c> Google</c><00:11:02.459><c> Maps</c><00:11:02.820><c> so</c><00:11:03.000><c> Google</c><00:11:03.180><c> Maps</c>

00:11:03.470 --> 00:11:03.480 align:start position:0%
don't have Google Maps so Google Maps
 

00:11:03.480 --> 00:11:04.910 align:start position:0%
don't have Google Maps so Google Maps
effectively<00:11:03.959><c> gets</c><00:11:04.200><c> around</c><00:11:04.320><c> this</c><00:11:04.560><c> because</c><00:11:04.680><c> it</c>

00:11:04.910 --> 00:11:04.920 align:start position:0%
effectively gets around this because it
 

00:11:04.920 --> 00:11:07.130 align:start position:0%
effectively gets around this because it
it<00:11:05.519><c> sort</c><00:11:05.820><c> of</c><00:11:05.940><c> implicitly</c><00:11:06.420><c> coordinates</c><00:11:06.899><c> people</c>

00:11:07.130 --> 00:11:07.140 align:start position:0%
it sort of implicitly coordinates people
 

00:11:07.140 --> 00:11:08.630 align:start position:0%
it sort of implicitly coordinates people
whether<00:11:07.560><c> you</c><00:11:07.860><c> you</c><00:11:08.040><c> know</c><00:11:08.279><c> you're</c><00:11:08.459><c> thinking</c>

00:11:08.630 --> 00:11:08.640 align:start position:0%
whether you you know you're thinking
 

00:11:08.640 --> 00:11:10.069 align:start position:0%
whether you you know you're thinking
about<00:11:08.760><c> it</c><00:11:08.940><c> or</c><00:11:09.060><c> not</c>

00:11:10.069 --> 00:11:10.079 align:start position:0%
about it or not
 

00:11:10.079 --> 00:11:11.990 align:start position:0%
about it or not
uh<00:11:10.680><c> but</c><00:11:10.860><c> assume</c><00:11:11.220><c> everyone's</c><00:11:11.579><c> selfish</c><00:11:11.820><c> and</c>

00:11:11.990 --> 00:11:12.000 align:start position:0%
uh but assume everyone's selfish and
 

00:11:12.000 --> 00:11:14.090 align:start position:0%
uh but assume everyone's selfish and
they<00:11:12.180><c> they</c><00:11:12.300><c> know</c><00:11:12.540><c> this</c><00:11:12.839><c> map</c><00:11:13.019><c> how</c><00:11:13.740><c> would</c><00:11:13.860><c> they</c>

00:11:14.090 --> 00:11:14.100 align:start position:0%
they they know this map how would they
 

00:11:14.100 --> 00:11:16.550 align:start position:0%
they they know this map how would they
how<00:11:14.459><c> would</c><00:11:14.640><c> they</c><00:11:14.820><c> choose</c><00:11:15.000><c> which</c><00:11:15.180><c> path</c><00:11:15.480><c> to</c><00:11:15.779><c> take</c>

00:11:16.550 --> 00:11:16.560 align:start position:0%
how would they choose which path to take
 

00:11:16.560 --> 00:11:19.190 align:start position:0%
how would they choose which path to take
and<00:11:17.279><c> the</c><00:11:17.820><c> the</c><00:11:18.000><c> thing</c><00:11:18.240><c> you</c><00:11:18.360><c> can</c><00:11:18.480><c> show</c><00:11:18.660><c> is</c>

00:11:19.190 --> 00:11:19.200 align:start position:0%
and the the thing you can show is
 

00:11:19.200 --> 00:11:21.350 align:start position:0%
and the the thing you can show is
basically<00:11:19.620><c> it</c><00:11:20.459><c> they</c><00:11:20.760><c> would</c><00:11:20.880><c> split</c><00:11:21.120><c> themselves</c>

00:11:21.350 --> 00:11:21.360 align:start position:0%
basically it they would split themselves
 

00:11:21.360 --> 00:11:23.690 align:start position:0%
basically it they would split themselves
up<00:11:21.540><c> 50</c><00:11:21.720><c> 50.</c><00:11:22.200><c> the</c><00:11:22.560><c> traffic</c><00:11:22.740><c> would</c><00:11:23.040><c> go</c><00:11:23.160><c> half</c><00:11:23.339><c> on</c>

00:11:23.690 --> 00:11:23.700 align:start position:0%
up 50 50. the traffic would go half on
 

00:11:23.700 --> 00:11:25.250 align:start position:0%
up 50 50. the traffic would go half on
the<00:11:23.820><c> upper</c><00:11:24.060><c> path</c><00:11:24.180><c> half</c><00:11:24.480><c> on</c><00:11:24.720><c> the</c><00:11:24.839><c> lower</c><00:11:24.959><c> path</c>

00:11:25.250 --> 00:11:25.260 align:start position:0%
the upper path half on the lower path
 

00:11:25.260 --> 00:11:27.889 align:start position:0%
the upper path half on the lower path
and<00:11:26.220><c> so</c><00:11:26.339><c> the</c><00:11:26.519><c> the</c><00:11:26.760><c> time</c><00:11:27.120><c> it</c><00:11:27.360><c> would</c><00:11:27.480><c> take</c><00:11:27.660><c> is</c>

00:11:27.889 --> 00:11:27.899 align:start position:0%
and so the the time it would take is
 

00:11:27.899 --> 00:11:29.930 align:start position:0%
and so the the time it would take is
three<00:11:28.200><c> half</c><00:11:28.380><c> you</c><00:11:28.800><c> know</c><00:11:28.920><c> we</c><00:11:29.040><c> choose</c><00:11:29.339><c> some</c><00:11:29.519><c> units</c>

00:11:29.930 --> 00:11:29.940 align:start position:0%
three half you know we choose some units
 

00:11:29.940 --> 00:11:32.329 align:start position:0%
three half you know we choose some units
uh<00:11:30.300><c> such</c><00:11:30.480><c> that</c><00:11:30.660><c> X's</c><00:11:31.019><c> from</c><00:11:31.200><c> zero</c><00:11:31.500><c> to</c><00:11:31.560><c> one</c><00:11:31.740><c> on</c><00:11:32.160><c> the</c>

00:11:32.329 --> 00:11:32.339 align:start position:0%
uh such that X's from zero to one on the
 

00:11:32.339 --> 00:11:33.350 align:start position:0%
uh such that X's from zero to one on the
other<00:11:32.399><c> hand</c>

00:11:33.350 --> 00:11:33.360 align:start position:0%
other hand
 

00:11:33.360 --> 00:11:35.329 align:start position:0%
other hand
you<00:11:33.720><c> might</c><00:11:33.899><c> think</c><00:11:34.019><c> that</c><00:11:34.200><c> adding</c><00:11:34.620><c> more</c><00:11:34.860><c> roads</c>

00:11:35.329 --> 00:11:35.339 align:start position:0%
you might think that adding more roads
 

00:11:35.339 --> 00:11:38.509 align:start position:0%
you might think that adding more roads
always<00:11:35.720><c> you</c><00:11:36.720><c> know</c><00:11:36.779><c> decreases</c><00:11:37.680><c> traffic</c><00:11:38.040><c> and</c>

00:11:38.509 --> 00:11:38.519 align:start position:0%
always you know decreases traffic and
 

00:11:38.519 --> 00:11:40.250 align:start position:0%
always you know decreases traffic and
this<00:11:38.820><c> is</c><00:11:38.880><c> not</c><00:11:39.060><c> true</c><00:11:39.360><c> so</c><00:11:39.779><c> there's</c><00:11:40.079><c> this</c>

00:11:40.250 --> 00:11:40.260 align:start position:0%
this is not true so there's this
 

00:11:40.260 --> 00:11:41.569 align:start position:0%
this is not true so there's this
interesting<00:11:40.620><c> thing</c><00:11:40.800><c> of</c><00:11:40.980><c> if</c><00:11:41.160><c> everyone's</c>

00:11:41.569 --> 00:11:41.579 align:start position:0%
interesting thing of if everyone's
 

00:11:41.579 --> 00:11:44.030 align:start position:0%
interesting thing of if everyone's
selfishly<00:11:42.000><c> optimizing</c><00:11:42.660><c> if</c><00:11:43.260><c> you</c><00:11:43.380><c> add</c><00:11:43.620><c> a</c><00:11:43.800><c> link</c>

00:11:44.030 --> 00:11:44.040 align:start position:0%
selfishly optimizing if you add a link
 

00:11:44.040 --> 00:11:46.310 align:start position:0%
selfishly optimizing if you add a link
between<00:11:44.640><c> the</c><00:11:45.000><c> two</c><00:11:45.120><c> middle</c><00:11:45.360><c> cities</c>

00:11:46.310 --> 00:11:46.320 align:start position:0%
between the two middle cities
 

00:11:46.320 --> 00:11:49.370 align:start position:0%
between the two middle cities
that<00:11:47.040><c> lets</c><00:11:47.399><c> you</c><00:11:47.459><c> teleport</c>

00:11:49.370 --> 00:11:49.380 align:start position:0%
that lets you teleport
 

00:11:49.380 --> 00:11:51.889 align:start position:0%
that lets you teleport
um<00:11:49.440><c> then</c><00:11:49.860><c> everyone</c><00:11:50.100><c> just</c><00:11:50.519><c> takes</c><00:11:50.820><c> the</c><00:11:51.360><c> X</c><00:11:51.540><c> middle</c>

00:11:51.889 --> 00:11:51.899 align:start position:0%
um then everyone just takes the X middle
 

00:11:51.899 --> 00:11:53.569 align:start position:0%
um then everyone just takes the X middle
link<00:11:52.140><c> X</c><00:11:52.560><c> path</c>

00:11:53.569 --> 00:11:53.579 align:start position:0%
link X path
 

00:11:53.579 --> 00:11:56.090 align:start position:0%
link X path
and<00:11:54.360><c> the</c><00:11:55.019><c> total</c><00:11:55.260><c> congestion</c><00:11:55.740><c> that</c><00:11:55.920><c> everyone</c>

00:11:56.090 --> 00:11:56.100 align:start position:0%
and the total congestion that everyone
 

00:11:56.100 --> 00:11:58.670 align:start position:0%
and the total congestion that everyone
realizes<00:11:56.700><c> goes</c><00:11:57.060><c> up</c><00:11:57.180><c> and</c><00:11:57.720><c> so</c><00:11:57.839><c> the</c><00:11:58.019><c> the</c><00:11:58.200><c> this</c>

00:11:58.670 --> 00:11:58.680 align:start position:0%
realizes goes up and so the the this
 

00:11:58.680 --> 00:12:01.730 align:start position:0%
realizes goes up and so the the this
sort<00:11:58.860><c> of</c><00:11:58.980><c> you</c><00:11:59.579><c> know</c><00:11:59.700><c> paradoxical</c><00:12:00.540><c> Behavior</c><00:12:01.079><c> Uh</c>

00:12:01.730 --> 00:12:01.740 align:start position:0%
sort of you know paradoxical Behavior Uh
 

00:12:01.740 --> 00:12:03.350 align:start position:0%
sort of you know paradoxical Behavior Uh
I<00:12:01.920><c> think</c><00:12:02.040><c> philosophers</c><00:12:02.519><c> would</c><00:12:02.700><c> not</c><00:12:03.060><c> call</c><00:12:03.240><c> this</c>

00:12:03.350 --> 00:12:03.360 align:start position:0%
I think philosophers would not call this
 

00:12:03.360 --> 00:12:05.750 align:start position:0%
I think philosophers would not call this
a<00:12:03.480><c> paradox</c><00:12:03.839><c> but</c><00:12:04.079><c> but</c><00:12:04.320><c> uh</c><00:12:04.860><c> economists</c><00:12:05.459><c> call</c><00:12:05.579><c> the</c>

00:12:05.750 --> 00:12:05.760 align:start position:0%
a paradox but but uh economists call the
 

00:12:05.760 --> 00:12:09.410 align:start position:0%
a paradox but but uh economists call the
Paradox<00:12:06.120><c> uh</c><00:12:07.560><c> is</c><00:12:08.160><c> that</c><00:12:08.820><c> you</c><00:12:09.120><c> know</c><00:12:09.180><c> even</c><00:12:09.300><c> though</c>

00:12:09.410 --> 00:12:09.420 align:start position:0%
Paradox uh is that you know even though
 

00:12:09.420 --> 00:12:10.850 align:start position:0%
Paradox uh is that you know even though
you<00:12:09.540><c> added</c><00:12:09.839><c> a</c><00:12:10.019><c> road</c><00:12:10.140><c> you've</c><00:12:10.740><c> actually</c>

00:12:10.850 --> 00:12:10.860 align:start position:0%
you added a road you've actually
 

00:12:10.860 --> 00:12:12.350 align:start position:0%
you added a road you've actually
worsened<00:12:11.459><c> congestion</c><00:12:11.880><c> because</c><00:12:12.120><c> people</c>

00:12:12.350 --> 00:12:12.360 align:start position:0%
worsened congestion because people
 

00:12:12.360 --> 00:12:13.910 align:start position:0%
worsened congestion because people
aren't<00:12:12.660><c> routing</c><00:12:13.079><c> themselves</c><00:12:13.380><c> across</c><00:12:13.800><c> the</c>

00:12:13.910 --> 00:12:13.920 align:start position:0%
aren't routing themselves across the
 

00:12:13.920 --> 00:12:15.350 align:start position:0%
aren't routing themselves across the
network<00:12:14.100><c> well</c><00:12:14.760><c> because</c><00:12:14.940><c> they're</c><00:12:15.180><c> not</c>

00:12:15.350 --> 00:12:15.360 align:start position:0%
network well because they're not
 

00:12:15.360 --> 00:12:16.670 align:start position:0%
network well because they're not
coordinating

00:12:16.670 --> 00:12:16.680 align:start position:0%
coordinating
 

00:12:16.680 --> 00:12:18.410 align:start position:0%
coordinating
so<00:12:16.980><c> you</c><00:12:17.160><c> might</c><00:12:17.279><c> say</c><00:12:17.459><c> okay</c><00:12:17.579><c> great</c><00:12:17.940><c> what</c><00:12:18.240><c> does</c>

00:12:18.410 --> 00:12:18.420 align:start position:0%
so you might say okay great what does
 

00:12:18.420 --> 00:12:20.990 align:start position:0%
so you might say okay great what does
traffic<00:12:18.600><c> have</c><00:12:18.899><c> to</c><00:12:19.079><c> do</c><00:12:19.140><c> with</c><00:12:19.260><c> crypto</c><00:12:19.680><c> well</c><00:12:20.339><c> you</c>

00:12:20.990 --> 00:12:21.000 align:start position:0%
traffic have to do with crypto well you
 

00:12:21.000 --> 00:12:22.490 align:start position:0%
traffic have to do with crypto well you
know<00:12:21.120><c> first</c>

00:12:22.490 --> 00:12:22.500 align:start position:0%
know first
 

00:12:22.500 --> 00:12:24.470 align:start position:0%
know first
before<00:12:23.040><c> we</c><00:12:23.279><c> even</c><00:12:23.399><c> get</c><00:12:23.640><c> to</c><00:12:23.760><c> that</c><00:12:23.880><c> you</c><00:12:24.180><c> may</c><00:12:24.300><c> think</c>

00:12:24.470 --> 00:12:24.480 align:start position:0%
before we even get to that you may think
 

00:12:24.480 --> 00:12:26.090 align:start position:0%
before we even get to that you may think
Med<00:12:24.779><c> is</c><00:12:25.200><c> always</c><00:12:25.320><c> bad</c><00:12:25.620><c> you</c><00:12:25.800><c> know</c><00:12:25.920><c> there's</c>

00:12:26.090 --> 00:12:26.100 align:start position:0%
Med is always bad you know there's
 

00:12:26.100 --> 00:12:27.710 align:start position:0%
Med is always bad you know there's
always<00:12:26.279><c> these</c><00:12:26.700><c> articles</c><00:12:27.000><c> that</c><00:12:27.360><c> people</c><00:12:27.600><c> are</c>

00:12:27.710 --> 00:12:27.720 align:start position:0%
always these articles that people are
 

00:12:27.720 --> 00:12:29.090 align:start position:0%
always these articles that people are
writing<00:12:28.019><c> that</c><00:12:28.200><c> are</c><00:12:28.380><c> like</c>

00:12:29.090 --> 00:12:29.100 align:start position:0%
writing that are like
 

00:12:29.100 --> 00:12:31.610 align:start position:0%
writing that are like
front<00:12:29.459><c> running</c><00:12:29.700><c> is</c><00:12:30.000><c> theft</c><00:12:30.420><c> it's</c><00:12:30.600><c> bribery</c><00:12:31.140><c> it's</c>

00:12:31.610 --> 00:12:31.620 align:start position:0%
front running is theft it's bribery it's
 

00:12:31.620 --> 00:12:33.769 align:start position:0%
front running is theft it's bribery it's
you<00:12:32.040><c> know</c><00:12:32.160><c> whatever</c><00:12:32.339><c> you</c><00:12:32.820><c> will</c><00:12:33.120><c> pick</c><00:12:33.540><c> your</c>

00:12:33.769 --> 00:12:33.779 align:start position:0%
you know whatever you will pick your
 

00:12:33.779 --> 00:12:36.230 align:start position:0%
you know whatever you will pick your
favorite<00:12:34.100><c> negatively</c><00:12:35.100><c> connotated</c><00:12:35.640><c> weasel</c>

00:12:36.230 --> 00:12:36.240 align:start position:0%
favorite negatively connotated weasel
 

00:12:36.240 --> 00:12:37.490 align:start position:0%
favorite negatively connotated weasel
weasel<00:12:36.660><c> word</c>

00:12:37.490 --> 00:12:37.500 align:start position:0%
weasel word
 

00:12:37.500 --> 00:12:40.670 align:start position:0%
weasel word
and<00:12:38.240><c> you</c><00:12:39.240><c> might</c><00:12:39.360><c> just</c><00:12:39.480><c> say</c><00:12:39.600><c> okay</c><00:12:39.839><c> like</c><00:12:40.140><c> yeah</c><00:12:40.380><c> it</c>

00:12:40.670 --> 00:12:40.680 align:start position:0%
and you might just say okay like yeah it
 

00:12:40.680 --> 00:12:42.949 align:start position:0%
and you might just say okay like yeah it
we<00:12:41.040><c> we</c><00:12:41.100><c> need</c><00:12:41.700><c> to</c><00:12:41.820><c> get</c><00:12:41.940><c> rid</c><00:12:42.060><c> of</c><00:12:42.240><c> it</c><00:12:42.360><c> at</c><00:12:42.540><c> all</c><00:12:42.660><c> costs</c>

00:12:42.949 --> 00:12:42.959 align:start position:0%
we we need to get rid of it at all costs
 

00:12:42.959 --> 00:12:44.389 align:start position:0%
we we need to get rid of it at all costs
with<00:12:43.260><c> that</c><00:12:43.380><c> instead</c><00:12:43.740><c> of</c><00:12:43.800><c> thinking</c><00:12:44.040><c> hey</c><00:12:44.220><c> maybe</c>

00:12:44.389 --> 00:12:44.399 align:start position:0%
with that instead of thinking hey maybe
 

00:12:44.399 --> 00:12:46.610 align:start position:0%
with that instead of thinking hey maybe
maybe<00:12:44.700><c> it's</c><00:12:44.940><c> just</c><00:12:45.120><c> endemic</c><00:12:45.600><c> to</c><00:12:45.839><c> such</c><00:12:46.079><c> systems</c>

00:12:46.610 --> 00:12:46.620 align:start position:0%
maybe it's just endemic to such systems
 

00:12:46.620 --> 00:12:49.310 align:start position:0%
maybe it's just endemic to such systems
we<00:12:47.459><c> we</c><00:12:47.519><c> saw</c><00:12:48.000><c> abrasive</c><00:12:48.360><c> Paradox</c><00:12:48.779><c> and</c><00:12:49.079><c> what</c>

00:12:49.310 --> 00:12:49.320 align:start position:0%
we we saw abrasive Paradox and what
 

00:12:49.320 --> 00:12:50.329 align:start position:0%
we we saw abrasive Paradox and what
we're<00:12:49.440><c> going</c><00:12:49.560><c> to</c><00:12:49.740><c> see</c><00:12:49.800><c> is</c><00:12:49.980><c> we're</c><00:12:50.100><c> going</c><00:12:50.220><c> to</c><00:12:50.279><c> see</c>

00:12:50.329 --> 00:12:50.339 align:start position:0%
we're going to see is we're going to see
 

00:12:50.339 --> 00:12:53.210 align:start position:0%
we're going to see is we're going to see
that<00:12:50.459><c> for</c><00:12:50.760><c> some</c><00:12:51.060><c> examples</c><00:12:51.839><c> of</c><00:12:52.560><c> applications</c>

00:12:53.210 --> 00:12:53.220 align:start position:0%
that for some examples of applications
 

00:12:53.220 --> 00:12:55.910 align:start position:0%
that for some examples of applications
in<00:12:53.579><c> crypto</c><00:12:54.000><c> you</c><00:12:54.779><c> can</c><00:12:54.899><c> get</c><00:12:55.079><c> around</c><00:12:55.320><c> braces</c>

00:12:55.910 --> 00:12:55.920 align:start position:0%
in crypto you can get around braces
 

00:12:55.920 --> 00:12:58.610 align:start position:0%
in crypto you can get around braces
Paradox<00:12:56.459><c> by</c><00:12:57.300><c> having</c><00:12:57.540><c> nav</c><00:12:57.779><c> which</c><00:12:58.200><c> sort</c><00:12:58.380><c> of</c><00:12:58.440><c> says</c>

00:12:58.610 --> 00:12:58.620 align:start position:0%
Paradox by having nav which sort of says
 

00:12:58.620 --> 00:13:00.650 align:start position:0%
Paradox by having nav which sort of says
Mev<00:12:58.980><c> has</c><00:12:59.220><c> some</c><00:12:59.459><c> positive</c><00:12:59.760><c> externality</c><00:13:00.420><c> in</c>

00:13:00.650 --> 00:13:00.660 align:start position:0%
Mev has some positive externality in
 

00:13:00.660 --> 00:13:03.350 align:start position:0%
Mev has some positive externality in
some<00:13:00.839><c> situations</c><00:13:01.260><c> which</c><00:13:01.920><c> is</c><00:13:02.100><c> you</c><00:13:02.639><c> know</c><00:13:02.760><c> the</c>

00:13:03.350 --> 00:13:03.360 align:start position:0%
some situations which is you know the
 

00:13:03.360 --> 00:13:05.990 align:start position:0%
some situations which is you know the
opposite<00:13:03.720><c> of</c><00:13:04.139><c> front</c><00:13:04.860><c> running</c><00:13:05.040><c> is</c><00:13:05.339><c> theft</c><00:13:05.700><c> as</c><00:13:05.820><c> a</c>

00:13:05.990 --> 00:13:06.000 align:start position:0%
opposite of front running is theft as a
 

00:13:06.000 --> 00:13:08.930 align:start position:0%
opposite of front running is theft as a
service<00:13:06.120><c> or</c><00:13:06.480><c> whatever</c>

00:13:08.930 --> 00:13:08.940 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:13:08.940 --> 00:13:11.090 align:start position:0%
 
um<00:13:09.000><c> and</c><00:13:09.420><c> again</c><00:13:09.540><c> not</c><00:13:10.380><c> all</c><00:13:10.560><c> applications</c><00:13:10.920><c> are</c>

00:13:11.090 --> 00:13:11.100 align:start position:0%
um and again not all applications are
 

00:13:11.100 --> 00:13:12.710 align:start position:0%
um and again not all applications are
the<00:13:11.279><c> same</c><00:13:11.399><c> so</c><00:13:11.639><c> that</c><00:13:11.940><c> that's</c><00:13:12.180><c> where</c><00:13:12.420><c> the</c><00:13:12.540><c> the</c>

00:13:12.710 --> 00:13:12.720 align:start position:0%
the same so that that's where the the
 

00:13:12.720 --> 00:13:14.690 align:start position:0%
the same so that that's where the the
conundrum<00:13:13.139><c> in</c><00:13:13.380><c> defining</c><00:13:13.860><c> your</c><00:13:14.100><c> sort</c><00:13:14.579><c> of</c>

00:13:14.690 --> 00:13:14.700 align:start position:0%
conundrum in defining your sort of
 

00:13:14.700 --> 00:13:18.350 align:start position:0%
conundrum in defining your sort of
optimization<00:13:15.600><c> problem</c><00:13:15.959><c> shows</c><00:13:16.620><c> up</c>

00:13:18.350 --> 00:13:18.360 align:start position:0%
optimization problem shows up
 

00:13:18.360 --> 00:13:19.730 align:start position:0%
optimization problem shows up
um<00:13:18.480><c> another</c><00:13:18.720><c> thing</c><00:13:18.959><c> that's</c><00:13:19.139><c> actually</c><00:13:19.380><c> really</c>

00:13:19.730 --> 00:13:19.740 align:start position:0%
um another thing that's actually really
 

00:13:19.740 --> 00:13:22.129 align:start position:0%
um another thing that's actually really
important<00:13:20.100><c> to</c><00:13:20.399><c> pay</c><00:13:20.579><c> attention</c><00:13:20.880><c> to</c><00:13:21.060><c> is</c><00:13:21.240><c> if</c><00:13:21.959><c> we</c>

00:13:22.129 --> 00:13:22.139 align:start position:0%
important to pay attention to is if we
 

00:13:22.139 --> 00:13:24.530 align:start position:0%
important to pay attention to is if we
classify<00:13:22.740><c> users</c><00:13:23.160><c> into</c><00:13:23.399><c> two</c><00:13:23.700><c> types</c><00:13:24.060><c> of</c><00:13:24.180><c> users</c>

00:13:24.530 --> 00:13:24.540 align:start position:0%
classify users into two types of users
 

00:13:24.540 --> 00:13:27.470 align:start position:0%
classify users into two types of users
strategic<00:13:25.440><c> users</c><00:13:25.860><c> who</c><00:13:26.220><c> are</c><00:13:26.339><c> Mev</c><00:13:26.880><c> Searchers</c><00:13:27.240><c> or</c>

00:13:27.470 --> 00:13:27.480 align:start position:0%
strategic users who are Mev Searchers or
 

00:13:27.480 --> 00:13:29.030 align:start position:0%
strategic users who are Mev Searchers or
people<00:13:27.660><c> who</c><00:13:27.839><c> are</c><00:13:27.959><c> trying</c><00:13:28.079><c> to</c><00:13:28.200><c> optimize</c><00:13:28.560><c> routes</c>

00:13:29.030 --> 00:13:29.040 align:start position:0%
people who are trying to optimize routes
 

00:13:29.040 --> 00:13:31.730 align:start position:0%
people who are trying to optimize routes
on<00:13:29.399><c> chain</c><00:13:29.760><c> and</c><00:13:30.360><c> non-strategic</c><00:13:31.019><c> user</c><00:13:31.380><c> like</c><00:13:31.560><c> the</c>

00:13:31.730 --> 00:13:31.740 align:start position:0%
on chain and non-strategic user like the
 

00:13:31.740 --> 00:13:33.949 align:start position:0%
on chain and non-strategic user like the
person<00:13:31.920><c> who</c><00:13:32.399><c> pays</c><00:13:32.760><c> 80</c><00:13:32.880><c> bips</c><00:13:33.300><c> for</c><00:13:33.480><c> a</c><00:13:33.600><c> metamask</c>

00:13:33.949 --> 00:13:33.959 align:start position:0%
person who pays 80 bips for a metamask
 

00:13:33.959 --> 00:13:36.410 align:start position:0%
person who pays 80 bips for a metamask
swap<00:13:34.380><c> if</c><00:13:35.220><c> we</c><00:13:35.399><c> kind</c><00:13:35.519><c> of</c><00:13:35.579><c> look</c><00:13:35.820><c> at</c><00:13:36.000><c> you</c><00:13:36.360><c> know</c>

00:13:36.410 --> 00:13:36.420 align:start position:0%
swap if we kind of look at you know
 

00:13:36.420 --> 00:13:39.050 align:start position:0%
swap if we kind of look at you know
those<00:13:36.839><c> two</c><00:13:37.079><c> two</c><00:13:37.440><c> sides</c><00:13:37.920><c> routing</c><00:13:38.760><c> is</c><00:13:38.940><c> actually</c>

00:13:39.050 --> 00:13:39.060 align:start position:0%
those two two sides routing is actually
 

00:13:39.060 --> 00:13:40.310 align:start position:0%
those two two sides routing is actually
one<00:13:39.240><c> of</c><00:13:39.360><c> the</c><00:13:39.480><c> hardest</c><00:13:39.779><c> problems</c><00:13:40.079><c> for</c>

00:13:40.310 --> 00:13:40.320 align:start position:0%
one of the hardest problems for
 

00:13:40.320 --> 00:13:42.170 align:start position:0%
one of the hardest problems for
non-strategic<00:13:40.980><c> users</c><00:13:41.339><c> so</c><00:13:41.519><c> non-strategic</c>

00:13:42.170 --> 00:13:42.180 align:start position:0%
non-strategic users so non-strategic
 

00:13:42.180 --> 00:13:44.269 align:start position:0%
non-strategic users so non-strategic
users<00:13:42.540><c> actually</c><00:13:42.839><c> in</c><00:13:43.260><c> fact</c><00:13:43.380><c> Outsource</c><00:13:43.980><c> that</c><00:13:44.100><c> to</c>

00:13:44.269 --> 00:13:44.279 align:start position:0%
users actually in fact Outsource that to
 

00:13:44.279 --> 00:13:46.250 align:start position:0%
users actually in fact Outsource that to
third<00:13:44.399><c> parties</c><00:13:44.820><c> right</c><00:13:45.060><c> now</c><00:13:45.180><c> right</c><00:13:45.360><c> so</c><00:13:45.720><c> if</c><00:13:46.139><c> I</c>

00:13:46.250 --> 00:13:46.260 align:start position:0%
third parties right now right so if I
 

00:13:46.260 --> 00:13:48.590 align:start position:0%
third parties right now right so if I
want<00:13:46.380><c> to</c><00:13:46.500><c> trade</c><00:13:46.680><c> token</c><00:13:47.040><c> a</c><00:13:47.160><c> for</c><00:13:47.399><c> token</c><00:13:47.760><c> B</c><00:13:47.880><c> but</c>

00:13:48.590 --> 00:13:48.600 align:start position:0%
want to trade token a for token B but
 

00:13:48.600 --> 00:13:50.930 align:start position:0%
want to trade token a for token B but
there's<00:13:48.779><c> no</c><00:13:49.079><c> pool</c><00:13:49.260><c> directly</c><00:13:49.740><c> from</c><00:13:50.399><c> A</c><00:13:50.519><c> to</c><00:13:50.639><c> B</c><00:13:50.760><c> or</c>

00:13:50.930 --> 00:13:50.940 align:start position:0%
there's no pool directly from A to B or
 

00:13:50.940 --> 00:13:52.790 align:start position:0%
there's no pool directly from A to B or
there's<00:13:51.120><c> not</c><00:13:51.240><c> enough</c><00:13:51.300><c> liquidity</c><00:13:52.200><c> you</c><00:13:52.620><c> know</c><00:13:52.680><c> I</c>

00:13:52.790 --> 00:13:52.800 align:start position:0%
there's not enough liquidity you know I
 

00:13:52.800 --> 00:13:55.250 align:start position:0%
there's not enough liquidity you know I
go<00:13:52.920><c> to</c><00:13:53.040><c> one</c><00:13:53.160><c> inch</c><00:13:53.459><c> matcha</c><00:13:53.880><c> gem</c><00:13:54.360><c> I'm</c><00:13:54.839><c> including</c>

00:13:55.250 --> 00:13:55.260 align:start position:0%
go to one inch matcha gem I'm including
 

00:13:55.260 --> 00:13:56.509 align:start position:0%
go to one inch matcha gem I'm including
gem<00:13:55.440><c> from</c><00:13:55.680><c> the</c><00:13:55.800><c> you</c><00:13:56.040><c> know</c><00:13:56.100><c> you</c><00:13:56.220><c> could</c><00:13:56.339><c> argue</c>

00:13:56.509 --> 00:13:56.519 align:start position:0%
gem from the you know you could argue
 

00:13:56.519 --> 00:13:59.389 align:start position:0%
gem from the you know you could argue
nfts<00:13:57.000><c> have</c><00:13:57.120><c> the</c><00:13:57.240><c> same</c><00:13:57.420><c> properties</c>

00:13:59.389 --> 00:13:59.399 align:start position:0%
nfts have the same properties
 

00:13:59.399 --> 00:14:01.850 align:start position:0%
nfts have the same properties
um<00:13:59.660><c> and</c><00:14:00.660><c> you</c><00:14:01.079><c> know</c><00:14:01.200><c> routing</c><00:14:01.560><c> is</c><00:14:01.740><c> actually</c>

00:14:01.850 --> 00:14:01.860 align:start position:0%
um and you know routing is actually
 

00:14:01.860 --> 00:14:03.829 align:start position:0%
um and you know routing is actually
quite<00:14:02.100><c> complicated</c><00:14:02.760><c> so</c><00:14:03.480><c> you</c><00:14:03.720><c> know</c>

00:14:03.829 --> 00:14:03.839 align:start position:0%
quite complicated so you know
 

00:14:03.839 --> 00:14:05.150 align:start position:0%
quite complicated so you know
algorithmic<00:14:04.380><c> game</c><00:14:04.560><c> theory</c><00:14:04.800><c> is</c><00:14:04.920><c> studied</c>

00:14:05.150 --> 00:14:05.160 align:start position:0%
algorithmic game theory is studied
 

00:14:05.160 --> 00:14:07.370 align:start position:0%
algorithmic game theory is studied
routing<00:14:05.519><c> in</c><00:14:05.760><c> fact</c><00:14:05.940><c> braces</c><00:14:06.420><c> Paradox</c><00:14:06.839><c> is</c><00:14:07.079><c> a</c>

00:14:07.370 --> 00:14:07.380 align:start position:0%
routing in fact braces Paradox is a
 

00:14:07.380 --> 00:14:10.009 align:start position:0%
routing in fact braces Paradox is a
great<00:14:07.740><c> example</c><00:14:08.160><c> of</c><00:14:08.339><c> of</c><00:14:08.579><c> how</c><00:14:08.940><c> how</c><00:14:09.540><c> to</c><00:14:09.720><c> study</c>

00:14:10.009 --> 00:14:10.019 align:start position:0%
great example of of how how to study
 

00:14:10.019 --> 00:14:11.030 align:start position:0%
great example of of how how to study
routing

00:14:11.030 --> 00:14:11.040 align:start position:0%
routing
 

00:14:11.040 --> 00:14:13.610 align:start position:0%
routing
uh<00:14:11.820><c> and</c><00:14:12.120><c> one</c><00:14:12.420><c> question</c><00:14:12.600><c> you</c><00:14:12.839><c> might</c><00:14:12.959><c> ask</c><00:14:13.139><c> is</c><00:14:13.320><c> hey</c>

00:14:13.610 --> 00:14:13.620 align:start position:0%
uh and one question you might ask is hey
 

00:14:13.620 --> 00:14:15.350 align:start position:0%
uh and one question you might ask is hey
does<00:14:13.800><c> this</c><00:14:13.980><c> apply</c><00:14:14.220><c> to</c><00:14:14.339><c> amms</c><00:14:14.820><c> does</c><00:14:15.000><c> this</c><00:14:15.120><c> apply</c>

00:14:15.350 --> 00:14:15.360 align:start position:0%
does this apply to amms does this apply
 

00:14:15.360 --> 00:14:17.389 align:start position:0%
does this apply to amms does this apply
to<00:14:15.480><c> one</c><00:14:15.600><c> inch</c><00:14:15.839><c> to</c><00:14:15.959><c> supply</c><00:14:16.079><c> the</c><00:14:16.380><c> mantra</c>

00:14:17.389 --> 00:14:17.399 align:start position:0%
to one inch to supply the mantra
 

00:14:17.399 --> 00:14:19.670 align:start position:0%
to one inch to supply the mantra
and<00:14:17.940><c> the</c><00:14:18.060><c> interesting</c><00:14:18.480><c> thing</c><00:14:18.779><c> that</c><00:14:19.440><c> you'll</c>

00:14:19.670 --> 00:14:19.680 align:start position:0%
and the interesting thing that you'll
 

00:14:19.680 --> 00:14:22.250 align:start position:0%
and the interesting thing that you'll
see<00:14:19.800><c> is</c><00:14:20.519><c> now</c><00:14:20.700><c> imagine</c><00:14:20.940><c> in</c><00:14:21.480><c> this</c><00:14:21.660><c> prior</c><00:14:21.899><c> example</c>

00:14:22.250 --> 00:14:22.260 align:start position:0%
see is now imagine in this prior example
 

00:14:22.260 --> 00:14:23.569 align:start position:0%
see is now imagine in this prior example
instead<00:14:22.620><c> of</c><00:14:22.680><c> teleporting</c><00:14:23.220><c> in</c><00:14:23.399><c> the</c><00:14:23.519><c> middle</c>

00:14:23.569 --> 00:14:23.579 align:start position:0%
instead of teleporting in the middle
 

00:14:23.579 --> 00:14:26.030 align:start position:0%
instead of teleporting in the middle
link<00:14:23.880><c> we</c><00:14:24.720><c> actually</c><00:14:24.899><c> add</c><00:14:25.200><c> a</c><00:14:25.440><c> small</c><00:14:25.620><c> amount</c><00:14:25.920><c> of</c>

00:14:26.030 --> 00:14:26.040 align:start position:0%
link we actually add a small amount of
 

00:14:26.040 --> 00:14:29.870 align:start position:0%
link we actually add a small amount of
congestion<00:14:26.720><c> Epsilon</c><00:14:27.720><c> times</c><00:14:28.079><c> the</c><00:14:28.740><c> traffic</c><00:14:29.160><c> now</c>

00:14:29.870 --> 00:14:29.880 align:start position:0%
congestion Epsilon times the traffic now
 

00:14:29.880 --> 00:14:31.370 align:start position:0%
congestion Epsilon times the traffic now
you<00:14:30.060><c> can</c><00:14:30.120><c> show</c><00:14:30.240><c> that</c><00:14:30.420><c> equilibria</c><00:14:30.959><c> basically</c>

00:14:31.370 --> 00:14:31.380 align:start position:0%
you can show that equilibria basically
 

00:14:31.380 --> 00:14:34.910 align:start position:0%
you can show that equilibria basically
approaches<00:14:32.040><c> something</c><00:14:32.459><c> uh</c><00:14:33.360><c> as</c><00:14:34.139><c> Epsilon</c><00:14:34.560><c> gets</c>

00:14:34.910 --> 00:14:34.920 align:start position:0%
approaches something uh as Epsilon gets
 

00:14:34.920 --> 00:14:37.550 align:start position:0%
approaches something uh as Epsilon gets
really<00:14:35.100><c> large</c><00:14:35.600><c> you</c><00:14:36.600><c> go</c><00:14:36.779><c> back</c><00:14:36.959><c> to</c><00:14:37.260><c> the</c>

00:14:37.550 --> 00:14:37.560 align:start position:0%
really large you go back to the
 

00:14:37.560 --> 00:14:39.410 align:start position:0%
really large you go back to the
condition<00:14:37.800><c> where</c><00:14:38.459><c> everyone</c><00:14:38.940><c> routes</c>

00:14:39.410 --> 00:14:39.420 align:start position:0%
condition where everyone routes
 

00:14:39.420 --> 00:14:41.210 align:start position:0%
condition where everyone routes
themselves<00:14:39.660><c> across</c><00:14:40.019><c> the</c><00:14:40.139><c> two</c><00:14:40.260><c> paths</c><00:14:40.620><c> and</c><00:14:41.040><c> when</c>

00:14:41.210 --> 00:14:41.220 align:start position:0%
themselves across the two paths and when
 

00:14:41.220 --> 00:14:42.710 align:start position:0%
themselves across the two paths and when
Epsilon<00:14:41.639><c> is</c><00:14:41.760><c> really</c><00:14:41.880><c> small</c><00:14:42.060><c> you</c><00:14:42.240><c> get</c><00:14:42.360><c> back</c><00:14:42.540><c> to</c>

00:14:42.710 --> 00:14:42.720 align:start position:0%
Epsilon is really small you get back to
 

00:14:42.720 --> 00:14:44.569 align:start position:0%
Epsilon is really small you get back to
the<00:14:42.839><c> the</c><00:14:42.959><c> purely</c><00:14:43.320><c> selfish</c><00:14:43.740><c> thing</c><00:14:43.860><c> and</c><00:14:44.459><c> the</c>

00:14:44.569 --> 00:14:44.579 align:start position:0%
the the purely selfish thing and the
 

00:14:44.579 --> 00:14:47.449 align:start position:0%
the the purely selfish thing and the
idea<00:14:44.760><c> is</c><00:14:44.940><c> the</c><00:14:45.300><c> Mev</c><00:14:46.199><c> Searchers</c><00:14:46.860><c> are</c><00:14:47.220><c> actually</c>

00:14:47.449 --> 00:14:47.459 align:start position:0%
idea is the Mev Searchers are actually
 

00:14:47.459 --> 00:14:49.610 align:start position:0%
idea is the Mev Searchers are actually
adding<00:14:48.000><c> this</c><00:14:48.240><c> extra</c><00:14:48.480><c> Epsilon</c><00:14:49.079><c> so</c><00:14:49.320><c> that</c><00:14:49.500><c> people</c>

00:14:49.610 --> 00:14:49.620 align:start position:0%
adding this extra Epsilon so that people
 

00:14:49.620 --> 00:14:51.350 align:start position:0%
adding this extra Epsilon so that people
route<00:14:49.920><c> themselves</c><00:14:50.399><c> across</c><00:14:50.820><c> the</c><00:14:50.880><c> graph</c><00:14:51.120><c> more</c>

00:14:51.350 --> 00:14:51.360 align:start position:0%
route themselves across the graph more
 

00:14:51.360 --> 00:14:53.569 align:start position:0%
route themselves across the graph more
efficiently<00:14:51.779><c> and</c><00:14:52.620><c> that's</c><00:14:52.860><c> something</c><00:14:53.220><c> that's</c>

00:14:53.569 --> 00:14:53.579 align:start position:0%
efficiently and that's something that's
 

00:14:53.579 --> 00:14:57.050 align:start position:0%
efficiently and that's something that's
a<00:14:53.940><c> weird</c><00:14:54.420><c> positive</c><00:14:54.959><c> externality</c><00:14:55.620><c> that</c><00:14:56.399><c> if</c><00:14:56.880><c> you</c>

00:14:57.050 --> 00:14:57.060 align:start position:0%
a weird positive externality that if you
 

00:14:57.060 --> 00:14:59.810 align:start position:0%
a weird positive externality that if you
write<00:14:57.420><c> out</c><00:14:57.600><c> the</c><00:14:57.779><c> math</c><00:14:57.899><c> you</c><00:14:58.260><c> know</c><00:14:58.440><c> I</c><00:14:58.620><c> I</c><00:14:59.339><c> try</c><00:14:59.579><c> to</c>

00:14:59.810 --> 00:14:59.820 align:start position:0%
write out the math you know I I try to
 

00:14:59.820 --> 00:15:01.730 align:start position:0%
write out the math you know I I try to
not<00:15:00.060><c> add</c><00:15:00.420><c> a</c><00:15:00.660><c> lot</c><00:15:00.839><c> of</c><00:15:00.899><c> the</c><00:15:00.959><c> equations</c><00:15:01.260><c> to</c><00:15:01.620><c> this</c>

00:15:01.730 --> 00:15:01.740 align:start position:0%
not add a lot of the equations to this
 

00:15:01.740 --> 00:15:04.129 align:start position:0%
not add a lot of the equations to this
talk<00:15:01.860><c> but</c><00:15:02.360><c> if</c><00:15:03.360><c> you</c><00:15:03.420><c> write</c><00:15:03.540><c> out</c><00:15:03.660><c> the</c><00:15:03.839><c> math</c><00:15:03.899><c> it's</c>

00:15:04.129 --> 00:15:04.139 align:start position:0%
talk but if you write out the math it's
 

00:15:04.139 --> 00:15:05.750 align:start position:0%
talk but if you write out the math it's
actually<00:15:04.320><c> quite</c><00:15:04.800><c> compelling</c><00:15:05.399><c> that</c><00:15:05.579><c> the</c>

00:15:05.750 --> 00:15:05.760 align:start position:0%
actually quite compelling that the
 

00:15:05.760 --> 00:15:07.910 align:start position:0%
actually quite compelling that the
social<00:15:05.880><c> welfare</c><00:15:06.360><c> somehow</c><00:15:06.839><c> has</c><00:15:06.959><c> improved</c><00:15:07.560><c> by</c>

00:15:07.910 --> 00:15:07.920 align:start position:0%
social welfare somehow has improved by
 

00:15:07.920 --> 00:15:10.490 align:start position:0%
social welfare somehow has improved by
Mev<00:15:08.399><c> in</c><00:15:08.880><c> some</c><00:15:09.060><c> scenarios</c><00:15:09.720><c> right</c><00:15:09.899><c> that's</c><00:15:10.320><c> not</c>

00:15:10.490 --> 00:15:10.500 align:start position:0%
Mev in some scenarios right that's not
 

00:15:10.500 --> 00:15:11.810 align:start position:0%
Mev in some scenarios right that's not
the<00:15:10.680><c> narrative</c><00:15:10.980><c> you</c><00:15:11.220><c> hear</c><00:15:11.399><c> right</c><00:15:11.579><c> the</c>

00:15:11.810 --> 00:15:11.820 align:start position:0%
the narrative you hear right the
 

00:15:11.820 --> 00:15:13.490 align:start position:0%
the narrative you hear right the
narrative<00:15:12.060><c> you</c><00:15:12.240><c> hear</c><00:15:12.360><c> is</c><00:15:12.480><c> like</c><00:15:12.720><c> oh</c><00:15:13.079><c> I'm</c><00:15:13.320><c> just</c>

00:15:13.490 --> 00:15:13.500 align:start position:0%
narrative you hear is like oh I'm just
 

00:15:13.500 --> 00:15:15.110 align:start position:0%
narrative you hear is like oh I'm just
grannies<00:15:13.980><c> are</c><00:15:14.100><c> getting</c><00:15:14.279><c> robbed</c><00:15:14.579><c> in</c><00:15:14.699><c> metamask</c>

00:15:15.110 --> 00:15:15.120 align:start position:0%
grannies are getting robbed in metamask
 

00:15:15.120 --> 00:15:17.870 align:start position:0%
grannies are getting robbed in metamask
and<00:15:15.360><c> that's</c><00:15:15.540><c> just</c><00:15:15.720><c> not</c><00:15:15.839><c> true</c><00:15:16.079><c> always</c><00:15:16.680><c> so</c><00:15:17.160><c> I</c><00:15:17.339><c> uh</c>

00:15:17.870 --> 00:15:17.880 align:start position:0%
and that's just not true always so I uh
 

00:15:17.880 --> 00:15:19.970 align:start position:0%
and that's just not true always so I uh
like<00:15:18.060><c> I</c><00:15:18.180><c> said</c><00:15:18.300><c> I'm</c><00:15:18.420><c> not</c><00:15:18.779><c> gonna</c><00:15:18.899><c> go</c><00:15:19.500><c> through</c><00:15:19.680><c> how</c>

00:15:19.970 --> 00:15:19.980 align:start position:0%
like I said I'm not gonna go through how
 

00:15:19.980 --> 00:15:21.889 align:start position:0%
like I said I'm not gonna go through how
you<00:15:20.100><c> show</c><00:15:20.459><c> such</c><00:15:20.699><c> a</c><00:15:20.820><c> thing</c><00:15:20.940><c> but</c><00:15:21.180><c> I'll</c><00:15:21.540><c> at</c><00:15:21.839><c> least</c>

00:15:21.889 --> 00:15:21.899 align:start position:0%
you show such a thing but I'll at least
 

00:15:21.899 --> 00:15:23.750 align:start position:0%
you show such a thing but I'll at least
give<00:15:22.260><c> you</c><00:15:22.380><c> an</c><00:15:22.500><c> idea</c><00:15:22.740><c> of</c><00:15:22.800><c> like</c><00:15:22.920><c> what</c><00:15:23.279><c> such</c><00:15:23.519><c> the</c>

00:15:23.750 --> 00:15:23.760 align:start position:0%
give you an idea of like what such the
 

00:15:23.760 --> 00:15:25.009 align:start position:0%
give you an idea of like what such the
theorem<00:15:24.060><c> statement</c><00:15:24.360><c> looks</c><00:15:24.600><c> like</c><00:15:24.660><c> for</c><00:15:24.839><c> such</c>

00:15:25.009 --> 00:15:25.019 align:start position:0%
theorem statement looks like for such
 

00:15:25.019 --> 00:15:26.030 align:start position:0%
theorem statement looks like for such
thing

00:15:26.030 --> 00:15:26.040 align:start position:0%
thing
 

00:15:26.040 --> 00:15:28.730 align:start position:0%
thing
and<00:15:26.399><c> the</c><00:15:26.519><c> idea</c><00:15:26.760><c> is</c><00:15:26.880><c> is</c><00:15:27.180><c> we</c><00:15:27.600><c> we</c><00:15:28.199><c> showed</c><00:15:28.680><c> that</c>

00:15:28.730 --> 00:15:28.740 align:start position:0%
and the idea is is we we showed that
 

00:15:28.740 --> 00:15:30.949 align:start position:0%
and the idea is is we we showed that
even<00:15:28.920><c> when</c><00:15:29.220><c> they're</c><00:15:29.399><c> sandwichers</c><00:15:29.940><c> the</c><00:15:30.839><c> price</c>

00:15:30.949 --> 00:15:30.959 align:start position:0%
even when they're sandwichers the price
 

00:15:30.959 --> 00:15:32.930 align:start position:0%
even when they're sandwichers the price
of<00:15:31.139><c> Anarchy</c><00:15:31.560><c> is</c><00:15:31.620><c> constant</c><00:15:32.040><c> remember</c><00:15:32.339><c> price</c><00:15:32.760><c> of</c>

00:15:32.930 --> 00:15:32.940 align:start position:0%
of Anarchy is constant remember price of
 

00:15:32.940 --> 00:15:35.269 align:start position:0%
of Anarchy is constant remember price of
Anarchy<00:15:33.300><c> constant</c><00:15:33.600><c> that's</c><00:15:33.779><c> good</c><00:15:34.079><c> that's</c><00:15:35.040><c> very</c>

00:15:35.269 --> 00:15:35.279 align:start position:0%
Anarchy constant that's good that's very
 

00:15:35.279 --> 00:15:36.889 align:start position:0%
Anarchy constant that's good that's very
surprising<00:15:35.699><c> you</c><00:15:35.940><c> would</c><00:15:36.060><c> think</c><00:15:36.180><c> that</c><00:15:36.360><c> hey</c><00:15:36.600><c> as</c>

00:15:36.889 --> 00:15:36.899 align:start position:0%
surprising you would think that hey as
 

00:15:36.899 --> 00:15:38.389 align:start position:0%
surprising you would think that hey as
more<00:15:37.139><c> users</c><00:15:37.500><c> come</c><00:15:37.680><c> to</c><00:15:37.800><c> network</c><00:15:37.980><c> sandwich</c>

00:15:38.389 --> 00:15:38.399 align:start position:0%
more users come to network sandwich
 

00:15:38.399 --> 00:15:39.889 align:start position:0%
more users come to network sandwich
attackers<00:15:38.940><c> make</c><00:15:39.120><c> more</c><00:15:39.300><c> of</c><00:15:39.420><c> a</c><00:15:39.540><c> profit</c><00:15:39.720><c> they</c>

00:15:39.889 --> 00:15:39.899 align:start position:0%
attackers make more of a profit they
 

00:15:39.899 --> 00:15:41.509 align:start position:0%
attackers make more of a profit they
cause<00:15:40.019><c> more</c><00:15:40.320><c> of</c><00:15:40.440><c> a</c><00:15:40.560><c> loss</c><00:15:40.740><c> but</c><00:15:41.220><c> in</c><00:15:41.339><c> some</c>

00:15:41.509 --> 00:15:41.519 align:start position:0%
cause more of a loss but in some
 

00:15:41.519 --> 00:15:43.850 align:start position:0%
cause more of a loss but in some
liquidity<00:15:42.000><c> conditions</c><00:15:42.420><c> they</c><00:15:42.600><c> do</c><00:15:42.779><c> not</c><00:15:42.959><c> and</c>

00:15:43.850 --> 00:15:43.860 align:start position:0%
liquidity conditions they do not and
 

00:15:43.860 --> 00:15:46.430 align:start position:0%
liquidity conditions they do not and
this<00:15:44.040><c> this</c><00:15:44.279><c> sort</c><00:15:44.519><c> of</c><00:15:44.639><c> bottom</c><00:15:45.120><c> chart</c><00:15:45.839><c> shows</c><00:15:46.380><c> you</c>

00:15:46.430 --> 00:15:46.440 align:start position:0%
this this sort of bottom chart shows you
 

00:15:46.440 --> 00:15:48.650 align:start position:0%
this this sort of bottom chart shows you
the<00:15:46.740><c> expected</c><00:15:47.160><c> profit</c><00:15:47.519><c> on</c><00:15:47.760><c> the</c><00:15:47.820><c> y-axis</c><00:15:48.300><c> and</c><00:15:48.480><c> it</c>

00:15:48.650 --> 00:15:48.660 align:start position:0%
the expected profit on the y-axis and it
 

00:15:48.660 --> 00:15:50.689 align:start position:0%
the expected profit on the y-axis and it
shows<00:15:48.959><c> you</c><00:15:49.019><c> sort</c><00:15:49.620><c> of</c><00:15:49.680><c> the</c><00:15:49.920><c> amount</c><00:15:50.220><c> of</c><00:15:50.339><c> slippage</c>

00:15:50.689 --> 00:15:50.699 align:start position:0%
shows you sort of the amount of slippage
 

00:15:50.699 --> 00:15:53.509 align:start position:0%
shows you sort of the amount of slippage
in<00:15:51.000><c> your</c><00:15:51.360><c> by</c><00:15:51.660><c> the</c><00:15:51.899><c> the</c><00:15:52.260><c> user</c><00:15:52.680><c> and</c><00:15:53.160><c> you'll</c><00:15:53.339><c> see</c>

00:15:53.509 --> 00:15:53.519 align:start position:0%
in your by the the user and you'll see
 

00:15:53.519 --> 00:15:55.550 align:start position:0%
in your by the the user and you'll see
that<00:15:53.820><c> it</c><00:15:54.060><c> has</c><00:15:54.240><c> a</c><00:15:54.360><c> Maxima</c><00:15:54.779><c> it's</c><00:15:55.019><c> not</c><00:15:55.199><c> like</c><00:15:55.380><c> it</c>

00:15:55.550 --> 00:15:55.560 align:start position:0%
that it has a Maxima it's not like it
 

00:15:55.560 --> 00:15:57.230 align:start position:0%
that it has a Maxima it's not like it
keeps<00:15:55.860><c> growing</c><00:15:56.160><c> and</c><00:15:56.399><c> that</c><00:15:56.579><c> that's</c><00:15:56.820><c> the</c><00:15:57.120><c> thing</c>

00:15:57.230 --> 00:15:57.240 align:start position:0%
keeps growing and that that's the thing
 

00:15:57.240 --> 00:15:59.810 align:start position:0%
keeps growing and that that's the thing
that's<00:15:57.480><c> actually</c><00:15:57.720><c> quite</c><00:15:58.579><c> interesting</c><00:15:59.579><c> and</c>

00:15:59.810 --> 00:15:59.820 align:start position:0%
that's actually quite interesting and
 

00:15:59.820 --> 00:16:01.550 align:start position:0%
that's actually quite interesting and
nice<00:16:00.000><c> about</c><00:16:00.240><c> this</c><00:16:00.540><c> example</c>

00:16:01.550 --> 00:16:01.560 align:start position:0%
nice about this example
 

00:16:01.560 --> 00:16:04.129 align:start position:0%
nice about this example
so<00:16:02.160><c> you've</c><00:16:02.459><c> listened</c><00:16:02.699><c> to</c><00:16:02.760><c> me</c><00:16:02.940><c> try</c><00:16:03.360><c> to</c><00:16:03.540><c> convince</c>

00:16:04.129 --> 00:16:04.139 align:start position:0%
so you've listened to me try to convince
 

00:16:04.139 --> 00:16:06.470 align:start position:0%
so you've listened to me try to convince
you<00:16:04.260><c> that</c><00:16:04.620><c> mev's</c><00:16:05.399><c> not</c><00:16:05.519><c> bad</c><00:16:05.699><c> it</c><00:16:05.940><c> can</c><00:16:06.120><c> have</c><00:16:06.300><c> these</c>

00:16:06.470 --> 00:16:06.480 align:start position:0%
you that mev's not bad it can have these
 

00:16:06.480 --> 00:16:07.850 align:start position:0%
you that mev's not bad it can have these
positive<00:16:06.720><c> externalities</c><00:16:07.320><c> maybe</c><00:16:07.680><c> there's</c>

00:16:07.850 --> 00:16:07.860 align:start position:0%
positive externalities maybe there's
 

00:16:07.860 --> 00:16:10.430 align:start position:0%
positive externalities maybe there's
something<00:16:08.160><c> really</c><00:16:08.459><c> interesting</c><00:16:09.019><c> uh</c><00:16:10.019><c> about</c><00:16:10.199><c> it</c>

00:16:10.430 --> 00:16:10.440 align:start position:0%
something really interesting uh about it
 

00:16:10.440 --> 00:16:12.949 align:start position:0%
something really interesting uh about it
and<00:16:10.620><c> maybe</c><00:16:10.800><c> you</c><00:16:10.980><c> can</c><00:16:11.100><c> direct</c><00:16:11.279><c> it</c><00:16:11.579><c> into</c><00:16:12.180><c> uh</c>

00:16:12.949 --> 00:16:12.959 align:start position:0%
and maybe you can direct it into uh
 

00:16:12.959 --> 00:16:14.449 align:start position:0%
and maybe you can direct it into uh
being<00:16:13.320><c> used</c><00:16:13.500><c> for</c><00:16:13.800><c> some</c><00:16:14.040><c> particular</c>

00:16:14.449 --> 00:16:14.459 align:start position:0%
being used for some particular
 

00:16:14.459 --> 00:16:18.470 align:start position:0%
being used for some particular
applications<00:16:15.060><c> that</c><00:16:15.920><c> uh</c><00:16:16.920><c> are</c><00:16:17.820><c> just</c><00:16:18.000><c> net</c><00:16:18.240><c> net</c>

00:16:18.470 --> 00:16:18.480 align:start position:0%
applications that uh are just net net
 

00:16:18.480 --> 00:16:20.810 align:start position:0%
applications that uh are just net net
beneficial<00:16:19.380><c> to</c><00:16:19.560><c> your</c><00:16:19.800><c> network</c><00:16:19.980><c> so</c><00:16:20.639><c> one</c>

00:16:20.810 --> 00:16:20.820 align:start position:0%
beneficial to your network so one
 

00:16:20.820 --> 00:16:22.730 align:start position:0%
beneficial to your network so one
question<00:16:20.940><c> is</c><00:16:21.120><c> what</c><00:16:21.360><c> do</c><00:16:21.480><c> you</c><00:16:21.540><c> do</c><00:16:21.720><c> to</c><00:16:22.019><c> to</c><00:16:22.199><c> harness</c>

00:16:22.730 --> 00:16:22.740 align:start position:0%
question is what do you do to to harness
 

00:16:22.740 --> 00:16:24.710 align:start position:0%
question is what do you do to to harness
it<00:16:22.920><c> for</c><00:16:23.100><c> good</c>

00:16:24.710 --> 00:16:24.720 align:start position:0%
it for good
 

00:16:24.720 --> 00:16:26.210 align:start position:0%
it for good
so<00:16:25.019><c> one</c><00:16:25.199><c> thing</c><00:16:25.320><c> I</c><00:16:25.500><c> think</c><00:16:25.620><c> that's</c><00:16:25.740><c> interesting</c>

00:16:26.210 --> 00:16:26.220 align:start position:0%
so one thing I think that's interesting
 

00:16:26.220 --> 00:16:28.129 align:start position:0%
so one thing I think that's interesting
and<00:16:26.519><c> and</c><00:16:26.639><c> this</c><00:16:26.880><c> goes</c><00:16:27.120><c> a</c><00:16:27.240><c> little</c><00:16:27.240><c> bit</c><00:16:27.420><c> to</c><00:16:27.600><c> Alex's</c>

00:16:28.129 --> 00:16:28.139 align:start position:0%
and and this goes a little bit to Alex's
 

00:16:28.139 --> 00:16:29.689 align:start position:0%
and and this goes a little bit to Alex's
talk<00:16:28.320><c> before</c>

00:16:29.689 --> 00:16:29.699 align:start position:0%
talk before
 

00:16:29.699 --> 00:16:31.129 align:start position:0%
talk before
is

00:16:31.129 --> 00:16:31.139 align:start position:0%
is
 

00:16:31.139 --> 00:16:34.910 align:start position:0%
is
suppose<00:16:32.100><c> you</c><00:16:32.339><c> did</c><00:16:32.579><c> have</c><00:16:32.880><c> a</c><00:16:33.180><c> mechanism</c><00:16:33.920><c> where</c>

00:16:34.910 --> 00:16:34.920 align:start position:0%
suppose you did have a mechanism where
 

00:16:34.920 --> 00:16:37.670 align:start position:0%
suppose you did have a mechanism where
it<00:16:35.279><c> was</c><00:16:35.399><c> just</c><00:16:35.579><c> extremely</c><00:16:36.060><c> expensive</c><00:16:36.720><c> for</c>

00:16:37.670 --> 00:16:37.680 align:start position:0%
it was just extremely expensive for
 

00:16:37.680 --> 00:16:41.230 align:start position:0%
it was just extremely expensive for
people<00:16:38.519><c> to</c><00:16:38.940><c> bribe</c><00:16:39.540><c> a</c><00:16:39.660><c> validator</c><00:16:40.019><c> off</c><00:16:40.320><c> chain</c>

00:16:41.230 --> 00:16:41.240 align:start position:0%
people to bribe a validator off chain
 

00:16:41.240 --> 00:16:44.389 align:start position:0%
people to bribe a validator off chain
and<00:16:42.240><c> in</c><00:16:42.959><c> fact</c><00:16:43.079><c> people</c><00:16:43.620><c> were</c><00:16:43.920><c> willing</c><00:16:44.220><c> to</c>

00:16:44.389 --> 00:16:44.399 align:start position:0%
and in fact people were willing to
 

00:16:44.399 --> 00:16:45.829 align:start position:0%
and in fact people were willing to
basically

00:16:45.829 --> 00:16:45.839 align:start position:0%
basically
 

00:16:45.839 --> 00:16:48.710 align:start position:0%
basically
uh<00:16:46.800><c> share</c><00:16:47.279><c> their</c><00:16:47.519><c> Mev</c><00:16:47.880><c> Revenue</c><00:16:48.120><c> imagine</c><00:16:48.360><c> like</c>

00:16:48.710 --> 00:16:48.720 align:start position:0%
uh share their Mev Revenue imagine like
 

00:16:48.720 --> 00:16:50.449 align:start position:0%
uh share their Mev Revenue imagine like
a<00:16:48.899><c> mining</c><00:16:49.139><c> pool</c><00:16:49.259><c> for</c><00:16:49.500><c> Mev</c><00:16:49.860><c> Revenue</c><00:16:50.100><c> now</c><00:16:50.279><c> the</c>

00:16:50.449 --> 00:16:50.459 align:start position:0%
a mining pool for Mev Revenue now the
 

00:16:50.459 --> 00:16:51.650 align:start position:0%
a mining pool for Mev Revenue now the
reason<00:16:50.639><c> that</c><00:16:50.880><c> that's</c><00:16:51.000><c> very</c><00:16:51.180><c> hard</c><00:16:51.360><c> to</c><00:16:51.480><c> design</c>

00:16:51.650 --> 00:16:51.660 align:start position:0%
reason that that's very hard to design
 

00:16:51.660 --> 00:16:53.569 align:start position:0%
reason that that's very hard to design
is<00:16:52.019><c> it's</c><00:16:52.259><c> very</c><00:16:52.380><c> hard</c><00:16:52.560><c> to</c><00:16:52.680><c> make</c><00:16:52.800><c> it</c><00:16:52.980><c> collusion</c>

00:16:53.569 --> 00:16:53.579 align:start position:0%
is it's very hard to make it collusion
 

00:16:53.579 --> 00:16:56.030 align:start position:0%
is it's very hard to make it collusion
proof<00:16:53.880><c> where</c><00:16:54.120><c> people</c><00:16:54.360><c> pay</c><00:16:54.660><c> one</c><00:16:55.019><c> minor</c><00:16:55.440><c> ahead</c>

00:16:56.030 --> 00:16:56.040 align:start position:0%
proof where people pay one minor ahead
 

00:16:56.040 --> 00:16:58.730 align:start position:0%
proof where people pay one minor ahead
of<00:16:56.160><c> time</c><00:16:56.279><c> who</c><00:16:56.519><c> in</c><00:16:56.880><c> the</c><00:16:57.000><c> pool</c><00:16:57.120><c> and</c><00:16:58.079><c> they</c><00:16:58.680><c> don't</c>

00:16:58.730 --> 00:16:58.740 align:start position:0%
of time who in the pool and they don't
 

00:16:58.740 --> 00:17:00.769 align:start position:0%
of time who in the pool and they don't
share<00:16:58.980><c> Revenue</c><00:16:59.220><c> with</c><00:16:59.399><c> everyone</c><00:16:59.579><c> but</c><00:17:00.540><c> suppose</c>

00:17:00.769 --> 00:17:00.779 align:start position:0%
share Revenue with everyone but suppose
 

00:17:00.779 --> 00:17:02.030 align:start position:0%
share Revenue with everyone but suppose
you<00:17:00.959><c> have</c><00:17:01.139><c> a</c><00:17:01.259><c> way</c><00:17:01.380><c> of</c><00:17:01.500><c> doing</c><00:17:01.560><c> that</c><00:17:01.680><c> and</c><00:17:01.860><c> there's</c>

00:17:02.030 --> 00:17:02.040 align:start position:0%
you have a way of doing that and there's
 

00:17:02.040 --> 00:17:03.590 align:start position:0%
you have a way of doing that and there's
a<00:17:02.220><c> lot</c><00:17:02.279><c> of</c><00:17:02.399><c> people</c><00:17:02.579><c> working</c><00:17:02.880><c> on</c><00:17:03.180><c> really</c><00:17:03.480><c> really</c>

00:17:03.590 --> 00:17:03.600 align:start position:0%
a lot of people working on really really
 

00:17:03.600 --> 00:17:05.090 align:start position:0%
a lot of people working on really really
interesting<00:17:04.020><c> stuff</c><00:17:04.260><c> both</c><00:17:04.740><c> on</c><00:17:05.040><c> the</c>

00:17:05.090 --> 00:17:05.100 align:start position:0%
interesting stuff both on the
 

00:17:05.100 --> 00:17:07.610 align:start position:0%
interesting stuff both on the
cryptography<00:17:05.760><c> side</c><00:17:05.939><c> as</c><00:17:06.600><c> well</c><00:17:06.780><c> as</c><00:17:06.900><c> on</c><00:17:07.199><c> the</c><00:17:07.380><c> sort</c>

00:17:07.610 --> 00:17:07.620 align:start position:0%
cryptography side as well as on the sort
 

00:17:07.620 --> 00:17:09.110 align:start position:0%
cryptography side as well as on the sort
of<00:17:07.740><c> distributed</c><00:17:08.220><c> system</c><00:17:08.339><c> side</c><00:17:08.579><c> for</c><00:17:08.880><c> for</c>

00:17:09.110 --> 00:17:09.120 align:start position:0%
of distributed system side for for
 

00:17:09.120 --> 00:17:11.990 align:start position:0%
of distributed system side for for
trying<00:17:09.780><c> to</c><00:17:10.079><c> to</c><00:17:10.380><c> to</c><00:17:10.500><c> do</c><00:17:11.160><c> such</c><00:17:11.280><c> a</c><00:17:11.459><c> thing</c><00:17:11.579><c> but</c>

00:17:11.990 --> 00:17:12.000 align:start position:0%
trying to to to do such a thing but
 

00:17:12.000 --> 00:17:14.329 align:start position:0%
trying to to to do such a thing but
suppose<00:17:12.360><c> you</c><00:17:12.540><c> have</c><00:17:12.720><c> such</c><00:17:12.900><c> a</c><00:17:13.079><c> mechanism</c><00:17:13.439><c> then</c>

00:17:14.329 --> 00:17:14.339 align:start position:0%
suppose you have such a mechanism then
 

00:17:14.339 --> 00:17:16.549 align:start position:0%
suppose you have such a mechanism then
you<00:17:14.520><c> can</c><00:17:14.640><c> redistribute</c><00:17:15.299><c> Mev</c>

00:17:16.549 --> 00:17:16.559 align:start position:0%
you can redistribute Mev
 

00:17:16.559 --> 00:17:19.429 align:start position:0%
you can redistribute Mev
to<00:17:17.040><c> all</c><00:17:17.220><c> the</c><00:17:17.339><c> validators</c><00:17:17.819><c> in</c><00:17:18.059><c> the</c><00:17:18.179><c> system</c><00:17:18.439><c> and</c>

00:17:19.429 --> 00:17:19.439 align:start position:0%
to all the validators in the system and
 

00:17:19.439 --> 00:17:21.409 align:start position:0%
to all the validators in the system and
one<00:17:19.919><c> very</c><00:17:20.100><c> interesting</c><00:17:20.520><c> thing</c><00:17:20.699><c> is</c><00:17:20.939><c> you</c><00:17:21.240><c> can</c>

00:17:21.409 --> 00:17:21.419 align:start position:0%
one very interesting thing is you can
 

00:17:21.419 --> 00:17:23.990 align:start position:0%
one very interesting thing is you can
show<00:17:22.199><c> in</c><00:17:22.500><c> some</c><00:17:22.740><c> some</c><00:17:22.980><c> sort</c><00:17:23.280><c> of</c><00:17:23.400><c> different</c>

00:17:23.990 --> 00:17:24.000 align:start position:0%
show in some some sort of different
 

00:17:24.000 --> 00:17:26.449 align:start position:0%
show in some some sort of different
types<00:17:24.360><c> of</c><00:17:24.419><c> for</c><00:17:24.600><c> different</c><00:17:24.839><c> types</c><00:17:25.020><c> of</c><00:17:25.079><c> Mev</c><00:17:25.919><c> you</c>

00:17:26.449 --> 00:17:26.459 align:start position:0%
types of for different types of Mev you
 

00:17:26.459 --> 00:17:28.250 align:start position:0%
types of for different types of Mev you
actually<00:17:26.579><c> can</c><00:17:26.939><c> lower</c><00:17:27.179><c> the</c><00:17:27.540><c> overall</c><00:17:27.839><c> inflation</c>

00:17:28.250 --> 00:17:28.260 align:start position:0%
actually can lower the overall inflation
 

00:17:28.260 --> 00:17:30.710 align:start position:0%
actually can lower the overall inflation
rate<00:17:28.559><c> of</c><00:17:28.740><c> the</c><00:17:28.919><c> network</c><00:17:29.100><c> if</c><00:17:29.640><c> the</c><00:17:29.760><c> Mev</c><00:17:30.179><c> subsidy</c>

00:17:30.710 --> 00:17:30.720 align:start position:0%
rate of the network if the Mev subsidy
 

00:17:30.720 --> 00:17:33.470 align:start position:0%
rate of the network if the Mev subsidy
is<00:17:30.840><c> large</c><00:17:31.080><c> enough</c><00:17:31.260><c> so</c><00:17:32.040><c> the</c><00:17:32.580><c> x-axis</c><00:17:33.179><c> on</c><00:17:33.360><c> this</c>

00:17:33.470 --> 00:17:33.480 align:start position:0%
is large enough so the x-axis on this
 

00:17:33.480 --> 00:17:35.390 align:start position:0%
is large enough so the x-axis on this
plot<00:17:33.660><c> is</c><00:17:33.840><c> the</c><00:17:34.080><c> percentage</c><00:17:34.500><c> of</c><00:17:34.620><c> Mev</c><00:17:35.100><c> Revenue</c>

00:17:35.390 --> 00:17:35.400 align:start position:0%
plot is the percentage of Mev Revenue
 

00:17:35.400 --> 00:17:38.150 align:start position:0%
plot is the percentage of Mev Revenue
shared<00:17:35.940><c> and</c><00:17:36.660><c> the</c><00:17:36.840><c> y-axis</c><00:17:37.440><c> sort</c><00:17:37.679><c> of</c><00:17:37.799><c> is</c><00:17:38.039><c> a</c>

00:17:38.150 --> 00:17:38.160 align:start position:0%
shared and the y-axis sort of is a
 

00:17:38.160 --> 00:17:40.789 align:start position:0%
shared and the y-axis sort of is a
measure<00:17:38.460><c> of</c><00:17:38.580><c> how</c><00:17:39.059><c> much</c><00:17:39.240><c> people</c><00:17:39.600><c> are</c><00:17:40.140><c> adjusting</c>

00:17:40.789 --> 00:17:40.799 align:start position:0%
measure of how much people are adjusting
 

00:17:40.799 --> 00:17:43.150 align:start position:0%
measure of how much people are adjusting
their<00:17:41.039><c> stake</c><00:17:41.400><c> so</c><00:17:41.880><c> let's</c><00:17:42.179><c> say</c><00:17:42.299><c> there's</c><00:17:42.600><c> sort</c><00:17:42.900><c> of</c>

00:17:43.150 --> 00:17:43.160 align:start position:0%
their stake so let's say there's sort of
 

00:17:43.160 --> 00:17:47.090 align:start position:0%
their stake so let's say there's sort of
opportunities<00:17:44.160><c> outside</c><00:17:44.580><c> of</c><00:17:45.059><c> uh</c><00:17:45.780><c> staking</c><00:17:46.200><c> that</c>

00:17:47.090 --> 00:17:47.100 align:start position:0%
opportunities outside of uh staking that
 

00:17:47.100 --> 00:17:48.590 align:start position:0%
opportunities outside of uh staking that
people<00:17:47.280><c> can</c><00:17:47.520><c> earn</c><00:17:47.820><c> yield</c><00:17:48.000><c> on</c><00:17:48.179><c> their</c><00:17:48.299><c> assets</c>

00:17:48.590 --> 00:17:48.600 align:start position:0%
people can earn yield on their assets
 

00:17:48.600 --> 00:17:51.110 align:start position:0%
people can earn yield on their assets
with<00:17:49.320><c> uh</c><00:17:49.980><c> one</c><00:17:50.220><c> question</c><00:17:50.400><c> you</c><00:17:50.640><c> might</c><00:17:50.760><c> ask</c><00:17:50.940><c> is</c>

00:17:51.110 --> 00:17:51.120 align:start position:0%
with uh one question you might ask is
 

00:17:51.120 --> 00:17:52.789 align:start position:0%
with uh one question you might ask is
like<00:17:51.419><c> what</c><00:17:51.780><c> what</c><00:17:52.020><c> are</c><00:17:52.200><c> the</c><00:17:52.260><c> incentives</c><00:17:52.620><c> that</c>

00:17:52.789 --> 00:17:52.799 align:start position:0%
like what what are the incentives that
 

00:17:52.799 --> 00:17:54.350 align:start position:0%
like what what are the incentives that
keep<00:17:52.980><c> people</c><00:17:53.100><c> staking</c><00:17:53.520><c> and</c><00:17:53.820><c> the</c><00:17:54.059><c> interesting</c>

00:17:54.350 --> 00:17:54.360 align:start position:0%
keep people staking and the interesting
 

00:17:54.360 --> 00:17:55.970 align:start position:0%
keep people staking and the interesting
thing<00:17:54.539><c> is</c><00:17:54.660><c> that</c><00:17:54.840><c> Mev</c><00:17:55.260><c> actually</c><00:17:55.500><c> adds</c><00:17:55.860><c> this</c>

00:17:55.970 --> 00:17:55.980 align:start position:0%
thing is that Mev actually adds this
 

00:17:55.980 --> 00:17:58.010 align:start position:0%
thing is that Mev actually adds this
feedback<00:17:56.280><c> loop</c><00:17:56.640><c> such</c><00:17:57.360><c> that</c><00:17:57.539><c> you</c><00:17:57.780><c> can</c><00:17:57.840><c> lower</c>

00:17:58.010 --> 00:17:58.020 align:start position:0%
feedback loop such that you can lower
 

00:17:58.020 --> 00:17:59.810 align:start position:0%
feedback loop such that you can lower
your<00:17:58.320><c> inflation</c><00:17:58.620><c> but</c><00:17:58.980><c> also</c><00:17:59.340><c> ensure</c><00:17:59.700><c> that</c>

00:17:59.810 --> 00:17:59.820 align:start position:0%
your inflation but also ensure that
 

00:17:59.820 --> 00:18:02.210 align:start position:0%
your inflation but also ensure that
people<00:18:00.059><c> stay</c><00:18:00.360><c> staked</c><00:18:00.900><c> and</c><00:18:01.559><c> so</c><00:18:01.740><c> you</c><00:18:01.980><c> know</c><00:18:02.039><c> the</c>

00:18:02.210 --> 00:18:02.220 align:start position:0%
people stay staked and so you know the
 

00:18:02.220 --> 00:18:04.070 align:start position:0%
people stay staked and so you know the
y-axis<00:18:02.760><c> is</c><00:18:02.880><c> sort</c><00:18:03.120><c> of</c><00:18:03.179><c> a</c><00:18:03.240><c> notion</c><00:18:03.539><c> of</c><00:18:03.660><c> percentage</c>

00:18:04.070 --> 00:18:04.080 align:start position:0%
y-axis is sort of a notion of percentage
 

00:18:04.080 --> 00:18:06.409 align:start position:0%
y-axis is sort of a notion of percentage
of<00:18:04.200><c> how</c><00:18:04.440><c> much</c><00:18:04.559><c> is</c><00:18:04.799><c> of</c><00:18:05.220><c> the</c><00:18:05.580><c> network</c><00:18:05.700><c> is</c><00:18:06.000><c> staked</c>

00:18:06.409 --> 00:18:06.419 align:start position:0%
of how much is of the network is staked
 

00:18:06.419 --> 00:18:09.470 align:start position:0%
of how much is of the network is staked
and<00:18:07.080><c> you</c><00:18:07.140><c> can</c><00:18:07.260><c> see</c><00:18:07.440><c> that</c><00:18:07.620><c> at</c><00:18:07.860><c> around</c><00:18:08.160><c> 25</c><00:18:08.580><c> to</c><00:18:09.059><c> 50</c>

00:18:09.470 --> 00:18:09.480 align:start position:0%
and you can see that at around 25 to 50
 

00:18:09.480 --> 00:18:11.750 align:start position:0%
and you can see that at around 25 to 50
in<00:18:10.140><c> this</c><00:18:10.320><c> stylus</c><00:18:10.919><c> model</c>

00:18:11.750 --> 00:18:11.760 align:start position:0%
in this stylus model
 

00:18:11.760 --> 00:18:14.810 align:start position:0%
in this stylus model
of<00:18:12.120><c> Revenue</c><00:18:12.960><c> sharing</c><00:18:13.440><c> you</c><00:18:14.220><c> actually</c><00:18:14.400><c> get</c>

00:18:14.810 --> 00:18:14.820 align:start position:0%
of Revenue sharing you actually get
 

00:18:14.820 --> 00:18:17.390 align:start position:0%
of Revenue sharing you actually get
people<00:18:15.299><c> to</c><00:18:15.600><c> continue</c><00:18:15.720><c> staking</c><00:18:16.320><c> which</c><00:18:16.860><c> is</c><00:18:17.039><c> just</c>

00:18:17.390 --> 00:18:17.400 align:start position:0%
people to continue staking which is just
 

00:18:17.400 --> 00:18:19.789 align:start position:0%
people to continue staking which is just
you<00:18:17.640><c> know</c><00:18:17.780><c> it's</c><00:18:18.780><c> just</c><00:18:19.080><c> kind</c><00:18:19.320><c> of</c><00:18:19.440><c> surprising</c>

00:18:19.789 --> 00:18:19.799 align:start position:0%
you know it's just kind of surprising
 

00:18:19.799 --> 00:18:21.169 align:start position:0%
you know it's just kind of surprising
right<00:18:19.980><c> like</c><00:18:20.220><c> everyone's</c><00:18:20.760><c> always</c><00:18:20.880><c> like</c><00:18:21.120><c> oh</c>

00:18:21.169 --> 00:18:21.179 align:start position:0%
right like everyone's always like oh
 

00:18:21.179 --> 00:18:22.190 align:start position:0%
right like everyone's always like oh
we've<00:18:21.419><c> always</c><00:18:21.539><c> needed</c><00:18:21.900><c> kind</c><00:18:22.080><c> of</c>

00:18:22.190 --> 00:18:22.200 align:start position:0%
we've always needed kind of
 

00:18:22.200 --> 00:18:24.409 align:start position:0%
we've always needed kind of
hyperinflationary<00:18:23.039><c> economics</c><00:18:24.000><c> and</c><00:18:24.240><c> there's</c>

00:18:24.409 --> 00:18:24.419 align:start position:0%
hyperinflationary economics and there's
 

00:18:24.419 --> 00:18:27.230 align:start position:0%
hyperinflationary economics and there's
lots<00:18:24.720><c> of</c><00:18:24.780><c> reasons</c><00:18:25.080><c> for</c><00:18:25.200><c> that</c><00:18:25.380><c> but</c><00:18:26.160><c> but</c><00:18:26.400><c> but</c><00:18:26.400><c> Mev</c>

00:18:27.230 --> 00:18:27.240 align:start position:0%
lots of reasons for that but but but Mev
 

00:18:27.240 --> 00:18:29.450 align:start position:0%
lots of reasons for that but but but Mev
distribution<00:18:28.020><c> also</c><00:18:28.500><c> allows</c><00:18:28.860><c> you</c><00:18:28.919><c> to</c><00:18:29.100><c> avoid</c>

00:18:29.450 --> 00:18:29.460 align:start position:0%
distribution also allows you to avoid
 

00:18:29.460 --> 00:18:31.610 align:start position:0%
distribution also allows you to avoid
having<00:18:29.820><c> to</c><00:18:30.059><c> do</c><00:18:30.179><c> that</c><00:18:30.299><c> so</c><00:18:30.539><c> that's</c><00:18:31.200><c> sort</c><00:18:31.380><c> of</c><00:18:31.440><c> like</c>

00:18:31.610 --> 00:18:31.620 align:start position:0%
having to do that so that's sort of like
 

00:18:31.620 --> 00:18:33.890 align:start position:0%
having to do that so that's sort of like
a<00:18:31.980><c> kind</c><00:18:32.460><c> of</c><00:18:32.520><c> amazing</c><00:18:32.880><c> blessing</c><00:18:33.299><c> in</c><00:18:33.480><c> disguise</c>

00:18:33.890 --> 00:18:33.900 align:start position:0%
a kind of amazing blessing in disguise
 

00:18:33.900 --> 00:18:35.870 align:start position:0%
a kind of amazing blessing in disguise
and<00:18:34.559><c> there's</c><00:18:34.679><c> a</c><00:18:34.799><c> lot</c><00:18:34.919><c> more</c><00:18:35.100><c> research</c><00:18:35.520><c> that</c><00:18:35.760><c> can</c>

00:18:35.870 --> 00:18:35.880 align:start position:0%
and there's a lot more research that can
 

00:18:35.880 --> 00:18:37.909 align:start position:0%
and there's a lot more research that can
be<00:18:36.000><c> done</c><00:18:36.120><c> in</c><00:18:36.360><c> this</c><00:18:36.539><c> space</c><00:18:36.960><c> that</c><00:18:37.260><c> I</c><00:18:37.500><c> think</c><00:18:37.559><c> we</c><00:18:37.679><c> we</c>

00:18:37.909 --> 00:18:37.919 align:start position:0%
be done in this space that I think we we
 

00:18:37.919 --> 00:18:40.010 align:start position:0%
be done in this space that I think we we
mainly<00:18:38.220><c> looked</c><00:18:38.520><c> at</c><00:18:38.580><c> how</c><00:18:39.059><c> liquidations</c><00:18:39.539><c> impact</c>

00:18:40.010 --> 00:18:40.020 align:start position:0%
mainly looked at how liquidations impact
 

00:18:40.020 --> 00:18:44.630 align:start position:0%
mainly looked at how liquidations impact
uh<00:18:41.480><c> Staker</c><00:18:42.480><c> incentives</c><00:18:43.400><c> uh</c><00:18:44.400><c> another</c>

00:18:44.630 --> 00:18:44.640 align:start position:0%
uh Staker incentives uh another
 

00:18:44.640 --> 00:18:45.950 align:start position:0%
uh Staker incentives uh another
interesting<00:18:45.120><c> thing</c><00:18:45.299><c> and</c><00:18:45.480><c> I</c><00:18:45.600><c> think</c><00:18:45.720><c> this</c><00:18:45.900><c> is</c>

00:18:45.950 --> 00:18:45.960 align:start position:0%
interesting thing and I think this is
 

00:18:45.960 --> 00:18:47.630 align:start position:0%
interesting thing and I think this is
the<00:18:46.140><c> type</c><00:18:46.320><c> of</c><00:18:46.440><c> thing</c><00:18:46.620><c> that</c><00:18:46.919><c> we're</c><00:18:47.280><c> seeing</c><00:18:47.460><c> in</c>

00:18:47.630 --> 00:18:47.640 align:start position:0%
the type of thing that we're seeing in
 

00:18:47.640 --> 00:18:49.430 align:start position:0%
the type of thing that we're seeing in
multiple<00:18:48.299><c> ecosystems</c><00:18:49.020><c> whether</c><00:18:49.260><c> it's</c>

00:18:49.430 --> 00:18:49.440 align:start position:0%
multiple ecosystems whether it's
 

00:18:49.440 --> 00:18:52.549 align:start position:0%
multiple ecosystems whether it's
ethereum<00:18:50.419><c> especially</c><00:18:51.419><c> with</c><00:18:51.720><c> roll-up</c>

00:18:52.549 --> 00:18:52.559 align:start position:0%
ethereum especially with roll-up
 

00:18:52.559 --> 00:18:56.090 align:start position:0%
ethereum especially with roll-up
auctions<00:18:53.160><c> whether</c><00:18:53.820><c> it's</c><00:18:54.059><c> in</c><00:18:54.299><c> Cosmos</c>

00:18:56.090 --> 00:18:56.100 align:start position:0%
auctions whether it's in Cosmos
 

00:18:56.100 --> 00:18:58.669 align:start position:0%
auctions whether it's in Cosmos
um<00:18:56.160><c> but</c><00:18:56.820><c> everyone</c><00:18:57.480><c> sort</c><00:18:57.900><c> of</c><00:18:57.960><c> is</c><00:18:58.320><c> starting</c><00:18:58.500><c> to</c>

00:18:58.669 --> 00:18:58.679 align:start position:0%
um but everyone sort of is starting to
 

00:18:58.679 --> 00:19:01.070 align:start position:0%
um but everyone sort of is starting to
realize<00:18:58.919><c> the</c><00:18:59.100><c> Mev</c><00:18:59.520><c> auction</c><00:18:59.820><c> of</c><00:19:00.360><c> having</c><00:19:00.780><c> a</c>

00:19:01.070 --> 00:19:01.080 align:start position:0%
realize the Mev auction of having a
 

00:19:01.080 --> 00:19:03.890 align:start position:0%
realize the Mev auction of having a
single<00:19:01.320><c> Mev</c><00:19:01.740><c> auction</c><00:19:01.980><c> for</c><00:19:02.400><c> everyone</c><00:19:03.240><c> to</c><00:19:03.780><c> kind</c>

00:19:03.890 --> 00:19:03.900 align:start position:0%
single Mev auction for everyone to kind
 

00:19:03.900 --> 00:19:07.130 align:start position:0%
single Mev auction for everyone to kind
of<00:19:04.020><c> compete</c><00:19:04.500><c> in</c><00:19:04.580><c> may</c><00:19:05.580><c> not</c><00:19:05.760><c> be</c><00:19:05.940><c> the</c><00:19:06.179><c> best</c><00:19:06.419><c> form</c>

00:19:07.130 --> 00:19:07.140 align:start position:0%
of compete in may not be the best form
 

00:19:07.140 --> 00:19:08.870 align:start position:0%
of compete in may not be the best form
of<00:19:07.380><c> an</c><00:19:07.500><c> auction</c><00:19:07.679><c> you</c><00:19:07.980><c> may</c><00:19:08.160><c> want</c><00:19:08.400><c> to</c><00:19:08.520><c> have</c><00:19:08.640><c> an</c>

00:19:08.870 --> 00:19:08.880 align:start position:0%
of an auction you may want to have an
 

00:19:08.880 --> 00:19:10.549 align:start position:0%
of an auction you may want to have an
auction<00:19:09.059><c> per</c><00:19:09.419><c> roll</c><00:19:09.660><c> up</c><00:19:09.900><c> you</c><00:19:10.140><c> may</c><00:19:10.260><c> want</c><00:19:10.380><c> to</c><00:19:10.500><c> have</c>

00:19:10.549 --> 00:19:10.559 align:start position:0%
auction per roll up you may want to have
 

00:19:10.559 --> 00:19:13.250 align:start position:0%
auction per roll up you may want to have
an<00:19:10.679><c> auction</c><00:19:10.860><c> per</c><00:19:11.160><c> application</c><00:19:11.700><c> and</c><00:19:12.299><c> so</c><00:19:13.080><c> that</c>

00:19:13.250 --> 00:19:13.260 align:start position:0%
an auction per application and so that
 

00:19:13.260 --> 00:19:14.990 align:start position:0%
an auction per application and so that
you<00:19:13.500><c> can</c><00:19:13.559><c> tune</c><00:19:13.799><c> the</c><00:19:14.039><c> aux</c><00:19:14.280><c> you</c><00:19:14.520><c> can</c><00:19:14.580><c> tune</c><00:19:14.760><c> the</c>

00:19:14.990 --> 00:19:15.000 align:start position:0%
you can tune the aux you can tune the
 

00:19:15.000 --> 00:19:16.730 align:start position:0%
you can tune the aux you can tune the
social<00:19:15.240><c> welfare</c><00:19:15.720><c> versus</c><00:19:15.960><c> Revenue</c><00:19:16.260><c> trade-off</c>

00:19:16.730 --> 00:19:16.740 align:start position:0%
social welfare versus Revenue trade-off
 

00:19:16.740 --> 00:19:19.370 align:start position:0%
social welfare versus Revenue trade-off
right<00:19:17.520><c> now</c><00:19:17.640><c> if</c><00:19:17.940><c> you</c><00:19:18.059><c> think</c><00:19:18.179><c> about</c><00:19:18.299><c> it</c><00:19:18.600><c> everyone</c>

00:19:19.370 --> 00:19:19.380 align:start position:0%
right now if you think about it everyone
 

00:19:19.380 --> 00:19:21.529 align:start position:0%
right now if you think about it everyone
who's<00:19:19.919><c> making</c><00:19:20.340><c> a</c><00:19:20.580><c> flashbulance</c><00:19:21.059><c> bundle</c><00:19:21.360><c> for</c>

00:19:21.529 --> 00:19:21.539 align:start position:0%
who's making a flashbulance bundle for
 

00:19:21.539 --> 00:19:23.570 align:start position:0%
who's making a flashbulance bundle for
an<00:19:21.720><c> nft</c><00:19:22.140><c> mint</c><00:19:22.559><c> is</c><00:19:22.740><c> competing</c><00:19:23.160><c> with</c><00:19:23.340><c> everyone</c>

00:19:23.570 --> 00:19:23.580 align:start position:0%
an nft mint is competing with everyone
 

00:19:23.580 --> 00:19:26.150 align:start position:0%
an nft mint is competing with everyone
who's<00:19:23.880><c> sandwiching</c><00:19:24.480><c> for</c><00:19:25.260><c> the</c><00:19:25.500><c> same</c><00:19:25.740><c> sort</c><00:19:26.039><c> of</c>

00:19:26.150 --> 00:19:26.160 align:start position:0%
who's sandwiching for the same sort of
 

00:19:26.160 --> 00:19:28.730 align:start position:0%
who's sandwiching for the same sort of
block<00:19:26.820><c> space</c><00:19:27.120><c> but</c><00:19:27.419><c> they</c><00:19:27.539><c> may</c><00:19:27.720><c> actually</c><00:19:27.960><c> if</c><00:19:28.620><c> you</c>

00:19:28.730 --> 00:19:28.740 align:start position:0%
block space but they may actually if you
 

00:19:28.740 --> 00:19:30.350 align:start position:0%
block space but they may actually if you
segment<00:19:29.100><c> to</c><00:19:29.220><c> the</c><00:19:29.400><c> block</c><00:19:29.520><c> space</c><00:19:29.760><c> and</c><00:19:30.000><c> say</c><00:19:30.120><c> only</c>

00:19:30.350 --> 00:19:30.360 align:start position:0%
segment to the block space and say only
 

00:19:30.360 --> 00:19:32.150 align:start position:0%
segment to the block space and say only
this<00:19:30.660><c> amount</c><00:19:30.960><c> goes</c><00:19:31.380><c> for</c><00:19:31.500><c> sandwiching</c><00:19:31.919><c> in</c><00:19:32.039><c> this</c>

00:19:32.150 --> 00:19:32.160 align:start position:0%
this amount goes for sandwiching in this
 

00:19:32.160 --> 00:19:34.070 align:start position:0%
this amount goes for sandwiching in this
amount<00:19:32.340><c> goes</c><00:19:32.640><c> for</c><00:19:32.760><c> nfts</c><00:19:33.360><c> you</c><00:19:33.660><c> might</c><00:19:33.780><c> have</c><00:19:33.960><c> a</c>

00:19:34.070 --> 00:19:34.080 align:start position:0%
amount goes for nfts you might have a
 

00:19:34.080 --> 00:19:36.350 align:start position:0%
amount goes for nfts you might have a
very<00:19:34.260><c> different</c><00:19:34.380><c> equilibria</c><00:19:35.160><c> uh</c><00:19:36.000><c> and</c><00:19:36.120><c> I</c><00:19:36.240><c> think</c>

00:19:36.350 --> 00:19:36.360 align:start position:0%
very different equilibria uh and I think
 

00:19:36.360 --> 00:19:38.570 align:start position:0%
very different equilibria uh and I think
you<00:19:36.720><c> know</c><00:19:36.780><c> a</c><00:19:37.260><c> lot</c><00:19:37.380><c> of</c><00:19:37.440><c> the</c><00:19:37.500><c> roll-up</c><00:19:37.860><c> developers</c>

00:19:38.570 --> 00:19:38.580 align:start position:0%
you know a lot of the roll-up developers
 

00:19:38.580 --> 00:19:40.850 align:start position:0%
you know a lot of the roll-up developers
are<00:19:38.820><c> are</c><00:19:39.059><c> basically</c><00:19:39.660><c> kind</c><00:19:40.080><c> of</c><00:19:40.200><c> talking</c><00:19:40.620><c> with</c>

00:19:40.850 --> 00:19:40.860 align:start position:0%
are are basically kind of talking with
 

00:19:40.860 --> 00:19:43.549 align:start position:0%
are are basically kind of talking with
us<00:19:41.039><c> but</c><00:19:41.820><c> an</c><00:19:42.360><c> interesting</c><00:19:42.660><c> thing</c><00:19:42.840><c> is</c><00:19:43.080><c> and</c><00:19:43.320><c> some</c>

00:19:43.549 --> 00:19:43.559 align:start position:0%
us but an interesting thing is and some
 

00:19:43.559 --> 00:19:45.470 align:start position:0%
us but an interesting thing is and some
some<00:19:43.799><c> current</c><00:19:44.100><c> work</c><00:19:44.400><c> is</c><00:19:44.700><c> you</c><00:19:45.299><c> can</c><00:19:45.360><c> actually</c>

00:19:45.470 --> 00:19:45.480 align:start position:0%
some current work is you can actually
 

00:19:45.480 --> 00:19:48.650 align:start position:0%
some current work is you can actually
show<00:19:45.720><c> that</c><00:19:45.960><c> disaggregating</c><00:19:47.059><c> uh</c><00:19:48.059><c> a</c><00:19:48.240><c> single</c>

00:19:48.650 --> 00:19:48.660 align:start position:0%
show that disaggregating uh a single
 

00:19:48.660 --> 00:19:50.510 align:start position:0%
show that disaggregating uh a single
auction<00:19:48.840><c> into</c><00:19:49.080><c> many</c><00:19:49.320><c> auctions</c><00:19:49.799><c> can</c><00:19:50.280><c> actually</c>

00:19:50.510 --> 00:19:50.520 align:start position:0%
auction into many auctions can actually
 

00:19:50.520 --> 00:19:52.850 align:start position:0%
auction into many auctions can actually
have<00:19:50.940><c> better</c><00:19:51.299><c> social</c><00:19:51.600><c> welfare</c><00:19:52.140><c> for</c><00:19:52.620><c> the</c><00:19:52.740><c> end</c>

00:19:52.850 --> 00:19:52.860 align:start position:0%
have better social welfare for the end
 

00:19:52.860 --> 00:19:54.770 align:start position:0%
have better social welfare for the end
user<00:19:53.220><c> and</c><00:19:53.520><c> that's</c><00:19:54.000><c> sort</c><00:19:54.240><c> of</c><00:19:54.299><c> like</c><00:19:54.480><c> an</c>

00:19:54.770 --> 00:19:54.780 align:start position:0%
user and that's sort of like an
 

00:19:54.780 --> 00:19:56.990 align:start position:0%
user and that's sort of like an
interesting<00:19:55.260><c> kind</c><00:19:55.500><c> of</c><00:19:55.620><c> trade-off</c><00:19:56.039><c> uh</c><00:19:56.700><c> that</c><00:19:56.820><c> I</c>

00:19:56.990 --> 00:19:57.000 align:start position:0%
interesting kind of trade-off uh that I
 

00:19:57.000 --> 00:19:59.270 align:start position:0%
interesting kind of trade-off uh that I
think<00:19:57.120><c> as</c><00:19:57.720><c> things</c><00:19:58.020><c> like</c><00:19:58.200><c> PBS</c><00:19:58.679><c> get</c><00:19:58.919><c> developed</c>

00:19:59.270 --> 00:19:59.280 align:start position:0%
think as things like PBS get developed
 

00:19:59.280 --> 00:20:01.490 align:start position:0%
think as things like PBS get developed
you<00:19:59.460><c> have</c><00:19:59.640><c> to</c><00:19:59.760><c> sort</c><00:19:59.940><c> of</c><00:20:00.419><c> analyze</c><00:20:01.140><c> these</c><00:20:01.260><c> types</c>

00:20:01.490 --> 00:20:01.500 align:start position:0%
you have to sort of analyze these types
 

00:20:01.500 --> 00:20:03.169 align:start position:0%
you have to sort of analyze these types
of<00:20:01.620><c> incentives</c>

00:20:03.169 --> 00:20:03.179 align:start position:0%
of incentives
 

00:20:03.179 --> 00:20:06.890 align:start position:0%
of incentives
um so<00:20:03.720><c> you</c><00:20:04.080><c> know</c><00:20:04.200><c> I</c><00:20:04.860><c> uh</c><00:20:05.220><c> I</c><00:20:05.520><c> think</c><00:20:05.660><c> I</c><00:20:06.660><c> want</c><00:20:06.780><c> to</c>

00:20:06.890 --> 00:20:06.900 align:start position:0%
um so you know I uh I think I want to
 

00:20:06.900 --> 00:20:08.570 align:start position:0%
um so you know I uh I think I want to
just<00:20:06.960><c> at</c><00:20:07.140><c> least</c><00:20:07.260><c> impress</c><00:20:07.500><c> upon</c><00:20:07.799><c> people</c><00:20:07.980><c> that</c>

00:20:08.570 --> 00:20:08.580 align:start position:0%
just at least impress upon people that
 

00:20:08.580 --> 00:20:10.789 align:start position:0%
just at least impress upon people that
theoretical<00:20:09.120><c> foundations</c><00:20:09.539><c> for</c><00:20:09.780><c> Mev</c><00:20:10.260><c> are</c>

00:20:10.789 --> 00:20:10.799 align:start position:0%
theoretical foundations for Mev are
 

00:20:10.799 --> 00:20:12.409 align:start position:0%
theoretical foundations for Mev are
really<00:20:10.919><c> important</c><00:20:11.280><c> and</c><00:20:11.520><c> I</c><00:20:11.580><c> think</c><00:20:11.700><c> we've</c><00:20:12.120><c> sort</c>

00:20:12.409 --> 00:20:12.419 align:start position:0%
really important and I think we've sort
 

00:20:12.419 --> 00:20:14.990 align:start position:0%
really important and I think we've sort
of<00:20:12.960><c> started</c><00:20:13.620><c> with</c><00:20:14.100><c> this</c><00:20:14.340><c> thing</c><00:20:14.460><c> as</c><00:20:14.640><c> this</c><00:20:14.820><c> like</c>

00:20:14.990 --> 00:20:15.000 align:start position:0%
of started with this thing as this like
 

00:20:15.000 --> 00:20:17.750 align:start position:0%
of started with this thing as this like
emergent<00:20:15.539><c> unstudied</c><00:20:16.200><c> phenomena</c><00:20:16.740><c> we</c><00:20:17.460><c> sort</c><00:20:17.700><c> of</c>

00:20:17.750 --> 00:20:17.760 align:start position:0%
emergent unstudied phenomena we sort of
 

00:20:17.760 --> 00:20:20.029 align:start position:0%
emergent unstudied phenomena we sort of
backed<00:20:18.179><c> our</c><00:20:18.299><c> way</c><00:20:18.480><c> into</c><00:20:18.720><c> some</c><00:20:19.020><c> mechanisms</c><00:20:19.620><c> for</c>

00:20:20.029 --> 00:20:20.039 align:start position:0%
backed our way into some mechanisms for
 

00:20:20.039 --> 00:20:23.930 align:start position:0%
backed our way into some mechanisms for
like<00:20:20.340><c> you</c><00:20:21.120><c> know</c><00:20:21.320><c> doing</c><00:20:22.320><c> an</c><00:20:22.559><c> auction</c><00:20:22.980><c> coming</c><00:20:23.760><c> up</c>

00:20:23.930 --> 00:20:23.940 align:start position:0%
like you know doing an auction coming up
 

00:20:23.940 --> 00:20:26.150 align:start position:0%
like you know doing an auction coming up
with<00:20:24.179><c> sort</c><00:20:24.419><c> of</c><00:20:24.539><c> rough</c><00:20:24.840><c> reputation</c><00:20:25.799><c> scores</c>

00:20:26.150 --> 00:20:26.160 align:start position:0%
with sort of rough reputation scores
 

00:20:26.160 --> 00:20:28.370 align:start position:0%
with sort of rough reputation scores
which<00:20:27.120><c> you</c><00:20:27.600><c> know</c><00:20:27.660><c> it's</c><00:20:27.720><c> not</c><00:20:27.900><c> totally</c><00:20:28.200><c> clear</c>

00:20:28.370 --> 00:20:28.380 align:start position:0%
which you know it's not totally clear
 

00:20:28.380 --> 00:20:30.169 align:start position:0%
which you know it's not totally clear
exactly<00:20:28.799><c> how</c><00:20:29.100><c> that</c><00:20:29.340><c> whole</c><00:20:29.520><c> system</c><00:20:29.760><c> can</c><00:20:30.059><c> be</c>

00:20:30.169 --> 00:20:30.179 align:start position:0%
exactly how that whole system can be
 

00:20:30.179 --> 00:20:31.190 align:start position:0%
exactly how that whole system can be
analyzed

00:20:31.190 --> 00:20:31.200 align:start position:0%
analyzed
 

00:20:31.200 --> 00:20:33.230 align:start position:0%
analyzed
uh<00:20:31.860><c> to</c><00:20:32.100><c> a</c><00:20:32.280><c> point</c><00:20:32.400><c> where</c><00:20:32.640><c> we</c><00:20:32.820><c> actually</c><00:20:32.940><c> are</c>

00:20:33.230 --> 00:20:33.240 align:start position:0%
uh to a point where we actually are
 

00:20:33.240 --> 00:20:34.789 align:start position:0%
uh to a point where we actually are
really<00:20:33.600><c> able</c><00:20:33.840><c> to</c><00:20:33.960><c> start</c><00:20:34.080><c> thinking</c><00:20:34.440><c> about</c><00:20:34.500><c> okay</c>

00:20:34.789 --> 00:20:34.799 align:start position:0%
really able to start thinking about okay
 

00:20:34.799 --> 00:20:36.470 align:start position:0%
really able to start thinking about okay
how<00:20:35.100><c> do</c><00:20:35.220><c> we</c><00:20:35.340><c> optimize</c>

00:20:36.470 --> 00:20:36.480 align:start position:0%
how do we optimize
 

00:20:36.480 --> 00:20:38.930 align:start position:0%
how do we optimize
for<00:20:37.200><c> things</c><00:20:37.740><c> like</c><00:20:37.919><c> redistribution</c><00:20:38.460><c> how</c><00:20:38.760><c> do</c><00:20:38.880><c> we</c>

00:20:38.930 --> 00:20:38.940 align:start position:0%
for things like redistribution how do we
 

00:20:38.940 --> 00:20:40.430 align:start position:0%
for things like redistribution how do we
optimize<00:20:39.299><c> for</c><00:20:39.480><c> social</c><00:20:39.720><c> welfare</c><00:20:40.080><c> how</c><00:20:40.320><c> do</c><00:20:40.440><c> we</c>

00:20:40.430 --> 00:20:40.440 align:start position:0%
optimize for social welfare how do we
 

00:20:40.440 --> 00:20:42.529 align:start position:0%
optimize for social welfare how do we
optimize<00:20:40.799><c> for</c><00:20:40.980><c> validator</c><00:20:41.340><c> Revenue</c><00:20:41.700><c> in</c><00:20:42.240><c> a</c><00:20:42.419><c> sort</c>

00:20:42.529 --> 00:20:42.539 align:start position:0%
optimize for validator Revenue in a sort
 

00:20:42.539 --> 00:20:44.029 align:start position:0%
optimize for validator Revenue in a sort
of<00:20:42.660><c> joint</c><00:20:43.020><c> manner</c>

00:20:44.029 --> 00:20:44.039 align:start position:0%
of joint manner
 

00:20:44.039 --> 00:20:46.370 align:start position:0%
of joint manner
and<00:20:44.700><c> formalism</c>

00:20:46.370 --> 00:20:46.380 align:start position:0%
and formalism
 

00:20:46.380 --> 00:20:49.730 align:start position:0%
and formalism
uh<00:20:46.860><c> I</c><00:20:47.039><c> think</c><00:20:47.220><c> it</c><00:20:48.000><c> provides</c><00:20:48.780><c> us</c><00:20:48.900><c> this</c><00:20:49.200><c> way</c><00:20:49.440><c> of</c>

00:20:49.730 --> 00:20:49.740 align:start position:0%
uh I think it provides us this way of
 

00:20:49.740 --> 00:20:53.270 align:start position:0%
uh I think it provides us this way of
finding<00:20:50.400><c> these</c><00:20:50.760><c> truths</c><00:20:51.240><c> about</c><00:20:51.900><c> Mev</c><00:20:52.559><c> where</c>

00:20:53.270 --> 00:20:53.280 align:start position:0%
finding these truths about Mev where
 

00:20:53.280 --> 00:20:54.830 align:start position:0%
finding these truths about Mev where
which<00:20:53.520><c> show</c><00:20:53.760><c> that</c><00:20:53.940><c> hey</c><00:20:54.179><c> it's</c><00:20:54.419><c> not</c><00:20:54.600><c> always</c>

00:20:54.830 --> 00:20:54.840 align:start position:0%
which show that hey it's not always
 

00:20:54.840 --> 00:20:57.830 align:start position:0%
which show that hey it's not always
robbing<00:20:55.559><c> grannies</c><00:20:55.919><c> in</c><00:20:56.160><c> metamask</c><00:20:56.640><c> and</c><00:20:57.600><c> the</c>

00:20:57.830 --> 00:20:57.840 align:start position:0%
robbing grannies in metamask and the
 

00:20:57.840 --> 00:20:59.510 align:start position:0%
robbing grannies in metamask and the
interesting<00:20:58.140><c> thing</c><00:20:58.260><c> is</c><00:20:58.380><c> I</c><00:20:58.559><c> think</c><00:20:58.740><c> people</c><00:20:59.220><c> you</c>

00:20:59.510 --> 00:20:59.520 align:start position:0%
interesting thing is I think people you
 

00:20:59.520 --> 00:21:00.890 align:start position:0%
interesting thing is I think people you
know<00:20:59.640><c> this</c><00:20:59.880><c> is</c><00:21:00.000><c> sort</c><00:21:00.120><c> of</c><00:21:00.240><c> the</c><00:21:00.299><c> beginning</c><00:21:00.480><c> of</c>

00:21:00.890 --> 00:21:00.900 align:start position:0%
know this is sort of the beginning of
 

00:21:00.900 --> 00:21:02.810 align:start position:0%
know this is sort of the beginning of
this<00:21:01.200><c> kind</c><00:21:01.440><c> of</c><00:21:01.559><c> new</c><00:21:01.799><c> branch</c><00:21:02.160><c> in</c><00:21:02.340><c> my</c><00:21:02.520><c> mind</c><00:21:02.640><c> of</c>

00:21:02.810 --> 00:21:02.820 align:start position:0%
this kind of new branch in my mind of
 

00:21:02.820 --> 00:21:04.370 align:start position:0%
this kind of new branch in my mind of
algorithmic<00:21:03.240><c> Game</c><00:21:03.419><c> Theory</c><00:21:03.720><c> where</c><00:21:04.200><c> you're</c>

00:21:04.370 --> 00:21:04.380 align:start position:0%
algorithmic Game Theory where you're
 

00:21:04.380 --> 00:21:06.350 align:start position:0%
algorithmic Game Theory where you're
really<00:21:04.620><c> focused</c><00:21:05.039><c> on</c><00:21:05.220><c> the</c><00:21:05.520><c> joint</c><00:21:05.820><c> optimization</c>

00:21:06.350 --> 00:21:06.360 align:start position:0%
really focused on the joint optimization
 

00:21:06.360 --> 00:21:07.789 align:start position:0%
really focused on the joint optimization
of<00:21:06.600><c> social</c><00:21:06.780><c> welfare</c><00:21:07.200><c> and</c><00:21:07.320><c> revenue</c><00:21:07.559><c> because</c>

00:21:07.789 --> 00:21:07.799 align:start position:0%
of social welfare and revenue because
 

00:21:07.799 --> 00:21:09.830 align:start position:0%
of social welfare and revenue because
both<00:21:08.400><c> of</c><00:21:08.580><c> them</c><00:21:08.700><c> are</c><00:21:08.940><c> extremely</c><00:21:09.299><c> important</c><00:21:09.660><c> to</c>

00:21:09.830 --> 00:21:09.840 align:start position:0%
both of them are extremely important to
 

00:21:09.840 --> 00:21:12.529 align:start position:0%
both of them are extremely important to
network<00:21:10.020><c> survival</c><00:21:10.559><c> in</c><00:21:10.860><c> cryptocurrencies</c>

00:21:12.529 --> 00:21:12.539 align:start position:0%
network survival in cryptocurrencies
 

00:21:12.539 --> 00:21:14.870 align:start position:0%
network survival in cryptocurrencies
and<00:21:13.140><c> so</c><00:21:13.320><c> I</c><00:21:13.559><c> I</c><00:21:13.679><c> want</c><00:21:14.039><c> to</c><00:21:14.160><c> leave</c><00:21:14.280><c> you</c><00:21:14.400><c> with</c><00:21:14.580><c> some</c>

00:21:14.870 --> 00:21:14.880 align:start position:0%
and so I I want to leave you with some
 

00:21:14.880 --> 00:21:16.730 align:start position:0%
and so I I want to leave you with some
open<00:21:15.000><c> problems</c><00:21:15.480><c> in</c><00:21:15.600><c> case</c><00:21:15.780><c> anyone</c><00:21:16.200><c> kind</c><00:21:16.500><c> of</c><00:21:16.620><c> is</c>

00:21:16.730 --> 00:21:16.740 align:start position:0%
open problems in case anyone kind of is
 

00:21:16.740 --> 00:21:20.029 align:start position:0%
open problems in case anyone kind of is
is<00:21:17.539><c> interested</c><00:21:18.539><c> in</c><00:21:18.720><c> this</c><00:21:18.900><c> type</c><00:21:19.020><c> of</c><00:21:19.140><c> stuff</c>

00:21:20.029 --> 00:21:20.039 align:start position:0%
is interested in this type of stuff
 

00:21:20.039 --> 00:21:22.430 align:start position:0%
is interested in this type of stuff
uh<00:21:20.820><c> the</c><00:21:21.059><c> first</c><00:21:21.120><c> thing</c><00:21:21.299><c> is</c><00:21:21.480><c> what's</c><00:21:21.840><c> a</c><00:21:22.020><c> notion</c><00:21:22.320><c> of</c>

00:21:22.430 --> 00:21:22.440 align:start position:0%
uh the first thing is what's a notion of
 

00:21:22.440 --> 00:21:24.049 align:start position:0%
uh the first thing is what's a notion of
optimality<00:21:23.039><c> for</c><00:21:23.220><c> an</c><00:21:23.340><c> auction</c><00:21:23.520><c> right</c><00:21:23.820><c> right</c>

00:21:24.049 --> 00:21:24.059 align:start position:0%
optimality for an auction right right
 

00:21:24.059 --> 00:21:25.909 align:start position:0%
optimality for an auction right right
now<00:21:24.240><c> if</c><00:21:24.419><c> you</c><00:21:24.539><c> look</c><00:21:24.660><c> at</c><00:21:24.720><c> flashbots</c>

00:21:25.909 --> 00:21:25.919 align:start position:0%
now if you look at flashbots
 

00:21:25.919 --> 00:21:28.370 align:start position:0%
now if you look at flashbots
it's<00:21:26.460><c> sort</c><00:21:26.640><c> of</c><00:21:26.820><c> a</c><00:21:27.299><c> first</c><00:21:27.480><c> price</c><00:21:27.660><c> auction</c><00:21:28.020><c> with</c>

00:21:28.370 --> 00:21:28.380 align:start position:0%
it's sort of a first price auction with
 

00:21:28.380 --> 00:21:29.990 align:start position:0%
it's sort of a first price auction with
some<00:21:28.500><c> filtering</c><00:21:28.980><c> because</c><00:21:29.280><c> they</c><00:21:29.700><c> use</c><00:21:29.880><c> a</c>

00:21:29.990 --> 00:21:30.000 align:start position:0%
some filtering because they use a
 

00:21:30.000 --> 00:21:31.250 align:start position:0%
some filtering because they use a
scoring<00:21:30.360><c> function</c><00:21:30.659><c> that</c><00:21:30.840><c> removes</c><00:21:31.140><c> some</c>

00:21:31.250 --> 00:21:31.260 align:start position:0%
scoring function that removes some
 

00:21:31.260 --> 00:21:33.049 align:start position:0%
scoring function that removes some
public<00:21:31.440><c> mempool</c><00:21:31.860><c> transactions</c><00:21:32.460><c> is</c><00:21:32.940><c> that</c>

00:21:33.049 --> 00:21:33.059 align:start position:0%
public mempool transactions is that
 

00:21:33.059 --> 00:21:34.610 align:start position:0%
public mempool transactions is that
optimal<00:21:33.419><c> does</c><00:21:33.600><c> that</c><00:21:33.780><c> work</c><00:21:33.960><c> when</c><00:21:34.260><c> you</c><00:21:34.380><c> have</c>

00:21:34.610 --> 00:21:34.620 align:start position:0%
optimal does that work when you have
 

00:21:34.620 --> 00:21:37.010 align:start position:0%
optimal does that work when you have
multiple<00:21:35.280><c> chains</c><00:21:35.760><c> or</c><00:21:35.940><c> multiple</c><00:21:36.360><c> this</c><00:21:36.720><c> sort</c><00:21:36.960><c> of</c>

00:21:37.010 --> 00:21:37.020 align:start position:0%
multiple chains or multiple this sort of
 

00:21:37.020 --> 00:21:39.770 align:start position:0%
multiple chains or multiple this sort of
hierarchical<00:21:37.559><c> system</c>

00:21:39.770 --> 00:21:39.780 align:start position:0%
hierarchical system
 

00:21:39.780 --> 00:21:42.590 align:start position:0%
hierarchical system
um<00:21:39.840><c> also</c><00:21:40.140><c> does</c><00:21:40.260><c> it</c><00:21:40.440><c> does</c><00:21:40.679><c> it</c><00:21:40.860><c> sort</c><00:21:41.039><c> of</c><00:21:41.580><c> uh</c><00:21:42.360><c> deal</c>

00:21:42.590 --> 00:21:42.600 align:start position:0%
um also does it does it sort of uh deal
 

00:21:42.600 --> 00:21:45.649 align:start position:0%
um also does it does it sort of uh deal
with<00:21:42.900><c> uh</c><00:21:43.860><c> some</c><00:21:44.100><c> of</c><00:21:44.159><c> the</c><00:21:44.280><c> problems</c><00:21:44.520><c> of</c><00:21:44.760><c> hey</c><00:21:45.240><c> how</c>

00:21:45.649 --> 00:21:45.659 align:start position:0%
with uh some of the problems of hey how
 

00:21:45.659 --> 00:21:47.570 align:start position:0%
with uh some of the problems of hey how
do<00:21:45.840><c> I</c><00:21:46.020><c> trust</c><00:21:46.200><c> the</c><00:21:46.380><c> auctioneer</c><00:21:46.860><c> right</c><00:21:47.159><c> now</c><00:21:47.280><c> we</c>

00:21:47.570 --> 00:21:47.580 align:start position:0%
do I trust the auctioneer right now we
 

00:21:47.580 --> 00:21:49.190 align:start position:0%
do I trust the auctioneer right now we
have<00:21:47.820><c> a</c><00:21:47.940><c> system</c><00:21:48.120><c> where</c><00:21:48.539><c> everyone</c><00:21:48.780><c> basically</c>

00:21:49.190 --> 00:21:49.200 align:start position:0%
have a system where everyone basically
 

00:21:49.200 --> 00:21:51.529 align:start position:0%
have a system where everyone basically
trusts<00:21:49.500><c> the</c><00:21:49.620><c> auctioneer</c><00:21:50.100><c> and</c>

00:21:51.529 --> 00:21:51.539 align:start position:0%
trusts the auctioneer and
 

00:21:51.539 --> 00:21:54.230 align:start position:0%
trusts the auctioneer and
you<00:21:52.020><c> know</c><00:21:52.140><c> economists</c><00:21:52.679><c> have</c><00:21:53.240><c> copied</c>

00:21:54.230 --> 00:21:54.240 align:start position:0%
you know economists have copied
 

00:21:54.240 --> 00:21:56.149 align:start position:0%
you know economists have copied
cryptocurrency<00:21:54.960><c> enthusiasts</c><00:21:55.559><c> and</c><00:21:55.799><c> made</c><00:21:56.039><c> some</c>

00:21:56.149 --> 00:21:56.159 align:start position:0%
cryptocurrency enthusiasts and made some
 

00:21:56.159 --> 00:21:58.430 align:start position:0%
cryptocurrency enthusiasts and made some
trilemmas<00:21:56.700><c> recently</c><00:21:57.120><c> on</c><00:21:57.840><c> proving</c><00:21:58.260><c> things</c>

00:21:58.430 --> 00:21:58.440 align:start position:0%
trilemmas recently on proving things
 

00:21:58.440 --> 00:22:02.270 align:start position:0%
trilemmas recently on proving things
about<00:21:58.799><c> when</c><00:21:59.400><c> auctions</c><00:22:00.120><c> uh</c><00:22:01.380><c> when</c><00:22:01.860><c> you</c><00:22:01.919><c> when</c><00:22:02.159><c> you</c>

00:22:02.270 --> 00:22:02.280 align:start position:0%
about when auctions uh when you when you
 

00:22:02.280 --> 00:22:03.770 align:start position:0%
about when auctions uh when you when you
when<00:22:02.460><c> and</c><00:22:02.700><c> when</c><00:22:02.880><c> you</c><00:22:03.059><c> can't</c><00:22:03.240><c> trust</c><00:22:03.600><c> an</c>

00:22:03.770 --> 00:22:03.780 align:start position:0%
when and when you can't trust an
 

00:22:03.780 --> 00:22:07.070 align:start position:0%
when and when you can't trust an
Auctioneer<00:22:04.220><c> and</c><00:22:05.220><c> a</c><00:22:05.520><c> lot</c><00:22:05.640><c> of</c><00:22:05.760><c> that</c><00:22:05.940><c> work</c>

00:22:07.070 --> 00:22:07.080 align:start position:0%
Auctioneer and a lot of that work
 

00:22:07.080 --> 00:22:08.750 align:start position:0%
Auctioneer and a lot of that work
you<00:22:07.440><c> know</c><00:22:07.500><c> I</c><00:22:07.620><c> think</c><00:22:07.740><c> if</c><00:22:08.100><c> the</c><00:22:08.220><c> right</c><00:22:08.460><c> people</c>

00:22:08.750 --> 00:22:08.760 align:start position:0%
you know I think if the right people
 

00:22:08.760 --> 00:22:11.330 align:start position:0%
you know I think if the right people
were<00:22:09.299><c> focused</c><00:22:09.900><c> on</c><00:22:10.020><c> it</c><00:22:10.200><c> could</c><00:22:11.159><c> really</c>

00:22:11.330 --> 00:22:11.340 align:start position:0%
were focused on it could really
 

00:22:11.340 --> 00:22:13.310 align:start position:0%
were focused on it could really
determine<00:22:11.820><c> how</c><00:22:12.120><c> PBS</c><00:22:12.600><c> functions</c><00:22:13.020><c> as</c><00:22:13.200><c> an</c>

00:22:13.310 --> 00:22:13.320 align:start position:0%
determine how PBS functions as an
 

00:22:13.320 --> 00:22:14.690 align:start position:0%
determine how PBS functions as an
auction<00:22:13.500><c> and</c><00:22:13.740><c> what</c><00:22:14.100><c> sort</c><00:22:14.340><c> of</c><00:22:14.400><c> like</c><00:22:14.520><c> the</c>

00:22:14.690 --> 00:22:14.700 align:start position:0%
auction and what sort of like the
 

00:22:14.700 --> 00:22:16.669 align:start position:0%
auction and what sort of like the
expected<00:22:15.120><c> properties</c><00:22:15.419><c> of</c><00:22:15.659><c> it</c><00:22:15.780><c> are</c><00:22:15.960><c> on</c><00:22:16.559><c> the</c>

00:22:16.669 --> 00:22:16.679 align:start position:0%
expected properties of it are on the
 

00:22:16.679 --> 00:22:17.930 align:start position:0%
expected properties of it are on the
other<00:22:16.799><c> hand</c><00:22:16.919><c> there's</c><00:22:17.220><c> sort</c><00:22:17.400><c> of</c><00:22:17.460><c> some</c><00:22:17.580><c> notion</c>

00:22:17.930 --> 00:22:17.940 align:start position:0%
other hand there's sort of some notion
 

00:22:17.940 --> 00:22:20.029 align:start position:0%
other hand there's sort of some notion
of<00:22:18.059><c> lower</c><00:22:18.299><c> bounds</c><00:22:18.780><c> like</c><00:22:18.960><c> in</c><00:22:19.679><c> an</c><00:22:19.860><c> open</c>

00:22:20.029 --> 00:22:20.039 align:start position:0%
of lower bounds like in an open
 

00:22:20.039 --> 00:22:23.390 align:start position:0%
of lower bounds like in an open
permissionless<00:22:20.700><c> system</c><00:22:21.080><c> with</c><00:22:22.080><c> a</c><00:22:22.620><c> some</c><00:22:23.039><c> notion</c>

00:22:23.390 --> 00:22:23.400 align:start position:0%
permissionless system with a some notion
 

00:22:23.400 --> 00:22:25.669 align:start position:0%
permissionless system with a some notion
of<00:22:23.640><c> value</c><00:22:24.000><c> there</c><00:22:24.780><c> sort</c><00:22:25.020><c> of</c><00:22:25.140><c> has</c><00:22:25.200><c> to</c><00:22:25.380><c> be</c><00:22:25.440><c> some</c>

00:22:25.669 --> 00:22:25.679 align:start position:0%
of value there sort of has to be some
 

00:22:25.679 --> 00:22:26.930 align:start position:0%
of value there sort of has to be some
lower<00:22:25.860><c> bound</c><00:22:26.159><c> to</c><00:22:26.400><c> the</c><00:22:26.580><c> amount</c><00:22:26.760><c> that's</c>

00:22:26.930 --> 00:22:26.940 align:start position:0%
lower bound to the amount that's
 

00:22:26.940 --> 00:22:28.789 align:start position:0%
lower bound to the amount that's
extracted<00:22:27.480><c> because</c><00:22:27.659><c> within</c><00:22:28.200><c> without</c><00:22:28.500><c> any</c>

00:22:28.789 --> 00:22:28.799 align:start position:0%
extracted because within without any
 

00:22:28.799 --> 00:22:30.529 align:start position:0%
extracted because within without any
extraction<00:22:29.280><c> it's</c><00:22:29.820><c> very</c><00:22:30.000><c> hard</c><00:22:30.240><c> to</c><00:22:30.419><c> imagine</c>

00:22:30.529 --> 00:22:30.539 align:start position:0%
extraction it's very hard to imagine
 

00:22:30.539 --> 00:22:33.230 align:start position:0%
extraction it's very hard to imagine
validators<00:22:31.320><c> being</c><00:22:32.039><c> able</c><00:22:32.220><c> to</c><00:22:32.460><c> to</c><00:22:32.640><c> continue</c><00:22:32.940><c> to</c>

00:22:33.230 --> 00:22:33.240 align:start position:0%
validators being able to to continue to
 

00:22:33.240 --> 00:22:35.270 align:start position:0%
validators being able to to continue to
sustain<00:22:33.780><c> the</c><00:22:33.960><c> network</c><00:22:34.200><c> and</c><00:22:34.799><c> so</c><00:22:34.919><c> one</c><00:22:35.100><c> question</c>

00:22:35.270 --> 00:22:35.280 align:start position:0%
sustain the network and so one question
 

00:22:35.280 --> 00:22:37.430 align:start position:0%
sustain the network and so one question
is<00:22:35.520><c> how</c><00:22:36.179><c> do</c><00:22:36.299><c> you</c><00:22:36.419><c> construct</c><00:22:36.720><c> those</c><00:22:37.080><c> lower</c>

00:22:37.430 --> 00:22:37.440 align:start position:0%
is how do you construct those lower
 

00:22:37.440 --> 00:22:40.010 align:start position:0%
is how do you construct those lower
bounds<00:22:37.919><c> you</c><00:22:38.159><c> know</c><00:22:38.220><c> in</c><00:22:38.940><c> information</c><00:22:39.419><c> Theory</c>

00:22:40.010 --> 00:22:40.020 align:start position:0%
bounds you know in information Theory
 

00:22:40.020 --> 00:22:42.470 align:start position:0%
bounds you know in information Theory
and<00:22:40.559><c> in</c><00:22:40.740><c> theoretical</c><00:22:41.159><c> computer</c><00:22:41.400><c> science</c><00:22:41.760><c> the</c>

00:22:42.470 --> 00:22:42.480 align:start position:0%
and in theoretical computer science the
 

00:22:42.480 --> 00:22:44.270 align:start position:0%
and in theoretical computer science the
lower<00:22:42.720><c> bounds</c><00:22:43.080><c> are</c><00:22:43.140><c> extremely</c><00:22:43.500><c> hard</c><00:22:43.679><c> upper</c>

00:22:44.270 --> 00:22:44.280 align:start position:0%
lower bounds are extremely hard upper
 

00:22:44.280 --> 00:22:46.430 align:start position:0%
lower bounds are extremely hard upper
bounds<00:22:44.580><c> are</c><00:22:44.700><c> always</c><00:22:44.820><c> easy</c><00:22:45.179><c> lower</c><00:22:45.900><c> bounds</c><00:22:46.320><c> are</c>

00:22:46.430 --> 00:22:46.440 align:start position:0%
bounds are always easy lower bounds are
 

00:22:46.440 --> 00:22:48.049 align:start position:0%
bounds are always easy lower bounds are
are<00:22:46.740><c> really</c><00:22:46.980><c> sort</c><00:22:47.220><c> of</c><00:22:47.340><c> some</c><00:22:47.460><c> of</c><00:22:47.580><c> the</c><00:22:47.700><c> hardest</c>

00:22:48.049 --> 00:22:48.059 align:start position:0%
are really sort of some of the hardest
 

00:22:48.059 --> 00:22:51.230 align:start position:0%
are really sort of some of the hardest
kind<00:22:48.419><c> of</c><00:22:48.539><c> things</c><00:22:49.140><c> to</c><00:22:49.440><c> show</c><00:22:49.620><c> and</c><00:22:50.580><c> I</c><00:22:50.880><c> think</c><00:22:51.000><c> the</c>

00:22:51.230 --> 00:22:51.240 align:start position:0%
kind of things to show and I think the
 

00:22:51.240 --> 00:22:54.409 align:start position:0%
kind of things to show and I think the
Mev<00:22:51.720><c> space</c><00:22:52.080><c> of</c><00:22:52.320><c> lower</c><00:22:52.500><c> balances</c><00:22:53.100><c> is</c><00:22:54.059><c> still</c>

00:22:54.409 --> 00:22:54.419 align:start position:0%
Mev space of lower balances is still
 

00:22:54.419 --> 00:22:56.690 align:start position:0%
Mev space of lower balances is still
quite<00:22:54.720><c> open</c><00:22:54.900><c> I</c><00:22:55.260><c> think</c><00:22:55.380><c> you</c><00:22:56.100><c> know</c>

00:22:56.690 --> 00:22:56.700 align:start position:0%
quite open I think you know
 

00:22:56.700 --> 00:22:59.990 align:start position:0%
quite open I think you know
in<00:22:57.360><c> in</c><00:22:57.720><c> spite</c><00:22:58.020><c> of</c><00:22:58.200><c> kind</c><00:22:58.559><c> of</c><00:22:58.679><c> there</c><00:22:59.100><c> being</c><00:22:59.340><c> some</c>

00:22:59.990 --> 00:23:00.000 align:start position:0%
in in spite of kind of there being some
 

00:23:00.000 --> 00:23:01.909 align:start position:0%
in in spite of kind of there being some
a<00:23:00.360><c> camp</c><00:23:00.480><c> of</c><00:23:00.720><c> some</c><00:23:00.900><c> people</c><00:23:01.020><c> who</c><00:23:01.200><c> believe</c><00:23:01.380><c> with</c>

00:23:01.909 --> 00:23:01.919 align:start position:0%
a camp of some people who believe with
 

00:23:01.919 --> 00:23:03.529 align:start position:0%
a camp of some people who believe with
sort<00:23:02.220><c> of</c><00:23:02.280><c> fair</c><00:23:02.400><c> ordering</c><00:23:02.820><c> that</c><00:23:03.000><c> there</c><00:23:03.120><c> exists</c>

00:23:03.529 --> 00:23:03.539 align:start position:0%
sort of fair ordering that there exists
 

00:23:03.539 --> 00:23:05.750 align:start position:0%
sort of fair ordering that there exists
no<00:23:03.780><c> such</c><00:23:04.020><c> lower</c><00:23:04.260><c> bound</c><00:23:04.500><c> I</c><00:23:04.740><c> I</c><00:23:04.980><c> would</c><00:23:05.280><c> I</c><00:23:05.640><c> would</c>

00:23:05.750 --> 00:23:05.760 align:start position:0%
no such lower bound I I would I would
 

00:23:05.760 --> 00:23:07.730 align:start position:0%
no such lower bound I I would I would
argue<00:23:06.059><c> I</c><00:23:06.539><c> would</c><00:23:06.840><c> argue</c><00:23:07.080><c> just</c><00:23:07.260><c> proving</c><00:23:07.620><c> that</c>

00:23:07.730 --> 00:23:07.740 align:start position:0%
argue I would argue just proving that
 

00:23:07.740 --> 00:23:09.470 align:start position:0%
argue I would argue just proving that
the<00:23:07.860><c> lower</c><00:23:07.980><c> bound's</c><00:23:08.340><c> not</c><00:23:08.460><c> zero</c><00:23:08.820><c> is</c><00:23:08.880><c> already</c><00:23:09.120><c> a</c>

00:23:09.470 --> 00:23:09.480 align:start position:0%
the lower bound's not zero is already a
 

00:23:09.480 --> 00:23:12.049 align:start position:0%
the lower bound's not zero is already a
quite<00:23:10.140><c> difficult</c><00:23:10.559><c> problem</c><00:23:11.159><c> that</c><00:23:11.520><c> would</c><00:23:11.700><c> you</c>

00:23:12.049 --> 00:23:12.059 align:start position:0%
quite difficult problem that would you
 

00:23:12.059 --> 00:23:12.950 align:start position:0%
quite difficult problem that would you
know

00:23:12.950 --> 00:23:12.960 align:start position:0%
know
 

00:23:12.960 --> 00:23:15.289 align:start position:0%
know
be<00:23:13.320><c> worth</c><00:23:13.500><c> solving</c>

00:23:15.289 --> 00:23:15.299 align:start position:0%
be worth solving
 

00:23:15.299 --> 00:23:18.649 align:start position:0%
be worth solving
and<00:23:15.840><c> the</c><00:23:16.020><c> last</c><00:23:16.200><c> thing</c><00:23:16.500><c> that's</c><00:23:17.100><c> a</c><00:23:17.400><c> very</c><00:23:17.580><c> big</c><00:23:17.940><c> uh</c>

00:23:18.649 --> 00:23:18.659 align:start position:0%
and the last thing that's a very big uh
 

00:23:18.659 --> 00:23:21.289 align:start position:0%
and the last thing that's a very big uh
open<00:23:18.780><c> problem</c><00:23:19.140><c> research-wise</c><00:23:19.980><c> in</c><00:23:20.100><c> Mev</c><00:23:20.880><c> is</c>

00:23:21.289 --> 00:23:21.299 align:start position:0%
open problem research-wise in Mev is
 

00:23:21.299 --> 00:23:23.029 align:start position:0%
open problem research-wise in Mev is
this<00:23:21.480><c> concept</c><00:23:21.840><c> of</c><00:23:22.020><c> aggregation</c><00:23:22.679><c> versus</c>

00:23:23.029 --> 00:23:23.039 align:start position:0%
this concept of aggregation versus
 

00:23:23.039 --> 00:23:25.010 align:start position:0%
this concept of aggregation versus
disaggregation<00:23:23.820><c> effects</c><00:23:24.240><c> and</c><00:23:24.360><c> so</c><00:23:24.539><c> I</c><00:23:24.720><c> think</c><00:23:24.840><c> a</c>

00:23:25.010 --> 00:23:25.020 align:start position:0%
disaggregation effects and so I think a
 

00:23:25.020 --> 00:23:26.510 align:start position:0%
disaggregation effects and so I think a
lot<00:23:25.080><c> of</c><00:23:25.200><c> people</c><00:23:25.320><c> in</c>

00:23:26.510 --> 00:23:26.520 align:start position:0%
lot of people in
 

00:23:26.520 --> 00:23:29.930 align:start position:0%
lot of people in
in<00:23:27.299><c> the</c><00:23:27.600><c> Mev</c><00:23:27.960><c> parlance</c><00:23:28.440><c> we'll</c><00:23:29.220><c> focus</c><00:23:29.640><c> on</c>

00:23:29.930 --> 00:23:29.940 align:start position:0%
in the Mev parlance we'll focus on
 

00:23:29.940 --> 00:23:31.430 align:start position:0%
in the Mev parlance we'll focus on
talking<00:23:30.179><c> about</c><00:23:30.419><c> things</c><00:23:30.659><c> like</c><00:23:30.900><c> private</c><00:23:31.320><c> order</c>

00:23:31.430 --> 00:23:31.440 align:start position:0%
talking about things like private order
 

00:23:31.440 --> 00:23:33.770 align:start position:0%
talking about things like private order
flow<00:23:31.860><c> order</c><00:23:32.100><c> flow</c><00:23:32.520><c> aggregation</c><00:23:33.059><c> like</c><00:23:33.600><c> what</c>

00:23:33.770 --> 00:23:33.780 align:start position:0%
flow order flow aggregation like what
 

00:23:33.780 --> 00:23:35.390 align:start position:0%
flow order flow aggregation like what
happens<00:23:33.960><c> when</c><00:23:34.200><c> a</c><00:23:34.320><c> builder</c><00:23:34.620><c> has</c><00:23:34.919><c> all</c><00:23:35.100><c> of</c><00:23:35.280><c> a</c>

00:23:35.390 --> 00:23:35.400 align:start position:0%
happens when a builder has all of a
 

00:23:35.400 --> 00:23:37.789 align:start position:0%
happens when a builder has all of a
certain<00:23:35.520><c> type</c><00:23:35.700><c> of</c><00:23:35.820><c> order</c><00:23:35.940><c> flow</c><00:23:36.440><c> there</c><00:23:37.440><c> are</c>

00:23:37.789 --> 00:23:37.799 align:start position:0%
certain type of order flow there are
 

00:23:37.799 --> 00:23:40.010 align:start position:0%
certain type of order flow there are
ways<00:23:38.100><c> to</c><00:23:38.340><c> to</c><00:23:38.460><c> talk</c><00:23:38.700><c> about</c><00:23:38.880><c> what</c><00:23:39.659><c> the</c>

00:23:40.010 --> 00:23:40.020 align:start position:0%
ways to to talk about what the
 

00:23:40.020 --> 00:23:41.990 align:start position:0%
ways to to talk about what the
equilibria<00:23:40.500><c> of</c><00:23:40.679><c> the</c><00:23:40.799><c> system</c><00:23:40.980><c> are</c><00:23:41.280><c> what's</c><00:23:41.760><c> the</c>

00:23:41.990 --> 00:23:42.000 align:start position:0%
equilibria of the system are what's the
 

00:23:42.000 --> 00:23:43.970 align:start position:0%
equilibria of the system are what's the
distribution<00:23:42.419><c> of</c><00:23:42.840><c> Revenue</c><00:23:43.200><c> to</c><00:23:43.740><c> different</c>

00:23:43.970 --> 00:23:43.980 align:start position:0%
distribution of Revenue to different
 

00:23:43.980 --> 00:23:47.390 align:start position:0%
distribution of Revenue to different
participants<00:23:44.520><c> uh</c><00:23:45.900><c> based</c><00:23:46.679><c> on</c><00:23:46.799><c> these</c><00:23:47.220><c> kind</c><00:23:47.340><c> of</c>

00:23:47.390 --> 00:23:47.400 align:start position:0%
participants uh based on these kind of
 

00:23:47.400 --> 00:23:48.950 align:start position:0%
participants uh based on these kind of
aggregation<00:23:48.000><c> versus</c><00:23:48.240><c> disaggregation</c>

00:23:48.950 --> 00:23:48.960 align:start position:0%
aggregation versus disaggregation
 

00:23:48.960 --> 00:23:51.289 align:start position:0%
aggregation versus disaggregation
effects<00:23:49.380><c> but</c><00:23:49.980><c> if</c><00:23:50.340><c> I</c><00:23:50.460><c> were</c><00:23:50.580><c> to</c><00:23:50.700><c> kind</c><00:23:51.000><c> of</c><00:23:51.120><c> give</c>

00:23:51.289 --> 00:23:51.299 align:start position:0%
effects but if I were to kind of give
 

00:23:51.299 --> 00:23:54.049 align:start position:0%
effects but if I were to kind of give
you<00:23:51.480><c> the</c><00:23:51.780><c> stylized</c><00:23:52.440><c> version</c><00:23:52.679><c> of</c><00:23:53.460><c> what</c><00:23:53.940><c> this</c>

00:23:54.049 --> 00:23:54.059 align:start position:0%
you the stylized version of what this
 

00:23:54.059 --> 00:23:55.610 align:start position:0%
you the stylized version of what this
question<00:23:54.240><c> is</c><00:23:54.539><c> asking</c><00:23:54.840><c> and</c><00:23:54.960><c> saying</c><00:23:55.260><c> what</c><00:23:55.440><c> is</c>

00:23:55.610 --> 00:23:55.620 align:start position:0%
question is asking and saying what is
 

00:23:55.620 --> 00:23:58.909 align:start position:0%
question is asking and saying what is
the<00:23:55.740><c> coast</c><00:23:55.919><c> theorem</c><00:23:56.460><c> for</c><00:23:56.760><c> Mev</c><00:23:57.179><c> so</c><00:23:57.600><c> cos</c><00:23:58.500><c> theorem</c>

00:23:58.909 --> 00:23:58.919 align:start position:0%
the coast theorem for Mev so cos theorem
 

00:23:58.919 --> 00:24:02.149 align:start position:0%
the coast theorem for Mev so cos theorem
for<00:23:59.760><c> for</c><00:23:59.820><c> for</c><00:24:00.140><c> those</c><00:24:01.140><c> who</c><00:24:01.320><c> don't</c><00:24:01.500><c> know</c><00:24:01.679><c> is</c><00:24:01.919><c> sort</c>

00:24:02.149 --> 00:24:02.159 align:start position:0%
for for for those who don't know is sort
 

00:24:02.159 --> 00:24:05.890 align:start position:0%
for for for those who don't know is sort
of<00:24:02.280><c> a</c><00:24:02.580><c> a</c><00:24:03.059><c> very</c><00:24:03.299><c> famous</c><00:24:03.919><c> thing</c><00:24:04.919><c> that</c><00:24:05.220><c> I</c><00:24:05.400><c> think</c>

00:24:05.890 --> 00:24:05.900 align:start position:0%
of a a very famous thing that I think
 

00:24:05.900 --> 00:24:08.570 align:start position:0%
of a a very famous thing that I think
basically<00:24:06.900><c> says</c><00:24:07.200><c> imagine</c><00:24:07.860><c> you</c><00:24:08.280><c> have</c><00:24:08.400><c> a</c>

00:24:08.570 --> 00:24:08.580 align:start position:0%
basically says imagine you have a
 

00:24:08.580 --> 00:24:09.649 align:start position:0%
basically says imagine you have a
company

00:24:09.649 --> 00:24:09.659 align:start position:0%
company
 

00:24:09.659 --> 00:24:12.049 align:start position:0%
company
now<00:24:10.200><c> suppose</c><00:24:10.679><c> the</c><00:24:10.860><c> company</c><00:24:11.039><c> had</c><00:24:11.400><c> everyone</c><00:24:11.700><c> at</c>

00:24:12.049 --> 00:24:12.059 align:start position:0%
now suppose the company had everyone at
 

00:24:12.059 --> 00:24:13.669 align:start position:0%
now suppose the company had everyone at
the<00:24:12.179><c> company</c><00:24:12.360><c> as</c><00:24:12.600><c> an</c><00:24:12.780><c> individual</c><00:24:13.200><c> contractor</c>

00:24:13.669 --> 00:24:13.679 align:start position:0%
the company as an individual contractor
 

00:24:13.679 --> 00:24:15.770 align:start position:0%
the company as an individual contractor
why<00:24:14.460><c> is</c><00:24:14.580><c> it</c><00:24:14.700><c> more</c><00:24:14.880><c> inefficient</c><00:24:15.360><c> why</c><00:24:15.600><c> is</c><00:24:15.659><c> it</c>

00:24:15.770 --> 00:24:15.780 align:start position:0%
why is it more inefficient why is it
 

00:24:15.780 --> 00:24:17.390 align:start position:0%
why is it more inefficient why is it
more<00:24:15.900><c> efficient</c><00:24:16.260><c> to</c><00:24:16.440><c> actually</c><00:24:16.559><c> organize</c><00:24:17.100><c> as</c><00:24:17.220><c> a</c>

00:24:17.390 --> 00:24:17.400 align:start position:0%
more efficient to actually organize as a
 

00:24:17.400 --> 00:24:19.549 align:start position:0%
more efficient to actually organize as a
group<00:24:17.520><c> versus</c><00:24:18.059><c> individual</c><00:24:18.720><c> contractors</c><00:24:19.260><c> who</c>

00:24:19.549 --> 00:24:19.559 align:start position:0%
group versus individual contractors who
 

00:24:19.559 --> 00:24:21.110 align:start position:0%
group versus individual contractors who
are<00:24:19.740><c> giving</c><00:24:19.980><c> payments</c><00:24:20.460><c> to</c><00:24:20.580><c> each</c><00:24:20.700><c> other</c><00:24:20.820><c> and</c>

00:24:21.110 --> 00:24:21.120 align:start position:0%
are giving payments to each other and
 

00:24:21.120 --> 00:24:23.090 align:start position:0%
are giving payments to each other and
the<00:24:21.539><c> coast</c><00:24:21.659><c> theorem</c><00:24:22.140><c> sort</c><00:24:22.320><c> of</c><00:24:22.380><c> says</c><00:24:22.620><c> there's</c>

00:24:23.090 --> 00:24:23.100 align:start position:0%
the coast theorem sort of says there's
 

00:24:23.100 --> 00:24:24.710 align:start position:0%
the coast theorem sort of says there's
some<00:24:23.280><c> equilibrium</c><00:24:23.820><c> the</c><00:24:24.059><c> Middle</c><00:24:24.179><c> where</c>

00:24:24.710 --> 00:24:24.720 align:start position:0%
some equilibrium the Middle where
 

00:24:24.720 --> 00:24:26.750 align:start position:0%
some equilibrium the Middle where
there's<00:24:25.440><c> aggregation</c><00:24:25.980><c> effects</c><00:24:26.340><c> where</c><00:24:26.580><c> it's</c>

00:24:26.750 --> 00:24:26.760 align:start position:0%
there's aggregation effects where it's
 

00:24:26.760 --> 00:24:29.149 align:start position:0%
there's aggregation effects where it's
cheaper<00:24:27.240><c> for</c><00:24:27.600><c> people</c><00:24:27.780><c> to</c><00:24:28.020><c> work</c><00:24:28.200><c> together</c><00:24:28.440><c> and</c>

00:24:29.149 --> 00:24:29.159 align:start position:0%
cheaper for people to work together and
 

00:24:29.159 --> 00:24:31.070 align:start position:0%
cheaper for people to work together and
share<00:24:29.460><c> common</c><00:24:29.700><c> infrastructure</c><00:24:30.360><c> up</c><00:24:30.720><c> to</c><00:24:30.900><c> some</c>

00:24:31.070 --> 00:24:31.080 align:start position:0%
share common infrastructure up to some
 

00:24:31.080 --> 00:24:32.510 align:start position:0%
share common infrastructure up to some
point<00:24:31.260><c> and</c><00:24:31.559><c> then</c><00:24:31.679><c> after</c><00:24:31.860><c> that</c><00:24:32.100><c> point</c><00:24:32.280><c> the</c>

00:24:32.510 --> 00:24:32.520 align:start position:0%
point and then after that point the
 

00:24:32.520 --> 00:24:34.370 align:start position:0%
point and then after that point the
overhead<00:24:33.299><c> of</c><00:24:33.480><c> managing</c><00:24:33.840><c> that</c><00:24:34.020><c> many</c><00:24:34.140><c> people</c>

00:24:34.370 --> 00:24:34.380 align:start position:0%
overhead of managing that many people
 

00:24:34.380 --> 00:24:37.130 align:start position:0%
overhead of managing that many people
starts<00:24:35.340><c> causing</c><00:24:35.880><c> you</c><00:24:36.000><c> to</c><00:24:36.299><c> to</c><00:24:36.600><c> lower</c><00:24:36.840><c> your</c>

00:24:37.130 --> 00:24:37.140 align:start position:0%
starts causing you to to lower your
 

00:24:37.140 --> 00:24:37.909 align:start position:0%
starts causing you to to lower your
welfare

00:24:37.909 --> 00:24:37.919 align:start position:0%
welfare
 

00:24:37.919 --> 00:24:40.370 align:start position:0%
welfare
and<00:24:38.760><c> this</c><00:24:39.179><c> notion</c><00:24:39.539><c> of</c><00:24:39.659><c> aggregation</c><00:24:40.140><c> versus</c>

00:24:40.370 --> 00:24:40.380 align:start position:0%
and this notion of aggregation versus
 

00:24:40.380 --> 00:24:42.590 align:start position:0%
and this notion of aggregation versus
disaggregation<00:24:41.039><c> and</c><00:24:41.280><c> Mev</c><00:24:41.700><c> is</c><00:24:42.059><c> is</c><00:24:42.179><c> completely</c>

00:24:42.590 --> 00:24:42.600 align:start position:0%
disaggregation and Mev is is completely
 

00:24:42.600 --> 00:24:44.090 align:start position:0%
disaggregation and Mev is is completely
unsolved<00:24:43.080><c> yet</c><00:24:43.200><c> people</c><00:24:43.440><c> are</c><00:24:43.620><c> always</c><00:24:43.799><c> talking</c>

00:24:44.090 --> 00:24:44.100 align:start position:0%
unsolved yet people are always talking
 

00:24:44.100 --> 00:24:46.730 align:start position:0%
unsolved yet people are always talking
about<00:24:44.340><c> it</c><00:24:44.580><c> it's</c><00:24:44.940><c> it's</c><00:24:45.000><c> kind</c><00:24:45.419><c> of</c><00:24:45.559><c> implied</c><00:24:46.559><c> in</c>

00:24:46.730 --> 00:24:46.740 align:start position:0%
about it it's it's kind of implied in
 

00:24:46.740 --> 00:24:49.669 align:start position:0%
about it it's it's kind of implied in
people's<00:24:47.159><c> language</c><00:24:47.400><c> yet</c><00:24:48.179><c> yet</c><00:24:48.419><c> not</c><00:24:48.720><c> formalized</c>

00:24:49.669 --> 00:24:49.679 align:start position:0%
people's language yet yet not formalized
 

00:24:49.679 --> 00:24:51.890 align:start position:0%
people's language yet yet not formalized
cool<00:24:50.100><c> and</c><00:24:50.700><c> so</c><00:24:50.940><c> that</c><00:24:51.120><c> with</c><00:24:51.360><c> that</c><00:24:51.480><c> I'll</c><00:24:51.720><c> leave</c>

00:24:51.890 --> 00:24:51.900 align:start position:0%
cool and so that with that I'll leave
 

00:24:51.900 --> 00:24:54.529 align:start position:0%
cool and so that with that I'll leave
you<00:24:52.020><c> for</c><00:24:52.260><c> questions</c><00:24:52.500><c> and</c><00:24:52.980><c> also</c><00:24:53.280><c> yeah</c><00:24:53.640><c> thank</c>

00:24:54.529 --> 00:24:54.539 align:start position:0%
you for questions and also yeah thank
 

00:24:54.539 --> 00:24:55.909 align:start position:0%
you for questions and also yeah thank
you<00:24:54.720><c> uh</c><00:24:55.080><c> do</c><00:24:55.200><c> you</c><00:24:55.260><c> have</c><00:24:55.320><c> any</c><00:24:55.440><c> questions</c><00:24:55.620><c> for</c>

00:24:55.909 --> 00:24:55.919 align:start position:0%
you uh do you have any questions for
 

00:24:55.919 --> 00:24:57.470 align:start position:0%
you uh do you have any questions for
tarun<00:24:56.280><c> if</c><00:24:56.580><c> so</c><00:24:56.760><c> please</c><00:24:56.880><c> raise</c><00:24:57.059><c> your</c><00:24:57.240><c> hand</c><00:24:57.360><c> we'll</c>

00:24:57.470 --> 00:24:57.480 align:start position:0%
tarun if so please raise your hand we'll
 

00:24:57.480 --> 00:24:59.450 align:start position:0%
tarun if so please raise your hand we'll
get<00:24:57.659><c> you</c><00:24:57.780><c> a</c><00:24:57.960><c> mic</c><00:24:58.200><c> we</c><00:24:58.559><c> got</c><00:24:58.740><c> one</c><00:24:58.919><c> question</c><00:24:59.100><c> on</c>

00:24:59.450 --> 00:24:59.460 align:start position:0%
get you a mic we got one question on
 

00:24:59.460 --> 00:25:01.190 align:start position:0%
get you a mic we got one question on
this<00:24:59.580><c> side</c><00:24:59.760><c> we'll</c><00:25:00.179><c> get</c><00:25:00.419><c> to</c><00:25:00.539><c> you</c><00:25:00.720><c> in</c><00:25:00.960><c> a</c><00:25:01.080><c> second</c>

00:25:01.190 --> 00:25:01.200 align:start position:0%
this side we'll get to you in a second
 

00:25:01.200 --> 00:25:04.490 align:start position:0%
this side we'll get to you in a second
got<00:25:01.620><c> another</c><00:25:01.740><c> question</c><00:25:02.039><c> at</c><00:25:02.280><c> the</c><00:25:02.400><c> back</c><00:25:02.580><c> hi</c><00:25:03.539><c> uh</c>

00:25:04.490 --> 00:25:04.500 align:start position:0%
got another question at the back hi uh
 

00:25:04.500 --> 00:25:07.870 align:start position:0%
got another question at the back hi uh
so<00:25:04.740><c> my</c><00:25:05.039><c> question</c><00:25:05.280><c> is</c><00:25:05.760><c> you</c><00:25:06.120><c> gave</c><00:25:06.299><c> an</c><00:25:06.539><c> example</c><00:25:06.960><c> of</c>

00:25:07.870 --> 00:25:07.880 align:start position:0%
so my question is you gave an example of
 

00:25:07.880 --> 00:25:10.970 align:start position:0%
so my question is you gave an example of
uh<00:25:08.880><c> you</c><00:25:09.179><c> gave</c><00:25:09.360><c> first</c><00:25:09.600><c> theoretical</c><00:25:10.260><c> example</c><00:25:10.740><c> of</c>

00:25:10.970 --> 00:25:10.980 align:start position:0%
uh you gave first theoretical example of
 

00:25:10.980 --> 00:25:14.750 align:start position:0%
uh you gave first theoretical example of
how<00:25:11.419><c> uh</c><00:25:12.419><c> removing</c><00:25:13.020><c> an</c><00:25:13.620><c> edge</c><00:25:13.860><c> from</c><00:25:14.340><c> a</c><00:25:14.580><c> network</c>

00:25:14.750 --> 00:25:14.760 align:start position:0%
how uh removing an edge from a network
 

00:25:14.760 --> 00:25:18.230 align:start position:0%
how uh removing an edge from a network
can<00:25:15.299><c> make</c><00:25:15.659><c> traffic</c><00:25:16.559><c> more</c><00:25:16.919><c> efficient</c><00:25:17.280><c> and</c><00:25:18.120><c> then</c>

00:25:18.230 --> 00:25:18.240 align:start position:0%
can make traffic more efficient and then
 

00:25:18.240 --> 00:25:20.090 align:start position:0%
can make traffic more efficient and then
you<00:25:18.419><c> give</c><00:25:18.600><c> an</c><00:25:18.780><c> analogy</c><00:25:19.260><c> for</c><00:25:19.440><c> how</c><00:25:19.740><c> this</c><00:25:19.980><c> can</c>

00:25:20.090 --> 00:25:20.100 align:start position:0%
you give an analogy for how this can
 

00:25:20.100 --> 00:25:22.730 align:start position:0%
you give an analogy for how this can
also<00:25:20.400><c> happen</c><00:25:20.580><c> with</c><00:25:20.940><c> amms</c><00:25:21.539><c> and</c><00:25:22.320><c> you</c><00:25:22.440><c> gave</c><00:25:22.559><c> a</c>

00:25:22.730 --> 00:25:22.740 align:start position:0%
also happen with amms and you gave a
 

00:25:22.740 --> 00:25:24.230 align:start position:0%
also happen with amms and you gave a
practical<00:25:23.039><c> example</c><00:25:23.400><c> of</c><00:25:23.520><c> how</c><00:25:23.820><c> it</c><00:25:23.940><c> could</c><00:25:24.059><c> happen</c>

00:25:24.230 --> 00:25:24.240 align:start position:0%
practical example of how it could happen
 

00:25:24.240 --> 00:25:27.950 align:start position:0%
practical example of how it could happen
with<00:25:24.539><c> amms</c><00:25:25.260><c> but</c><00:25:25.799><c> I</c><00:25:26.220><c> I</c><00:25:26.520><c> did</c><00:25:26.760><c> not</c><00:25:26.940><c> understand</c><00:25:27.179><c> how</c>

00:25:27.950 --> 00:25:27.960 align:start position:0%
with amms but I I did not understand how
 

00:25:27.960 --> 00:25:30.710 align:start position:0%
with amms but I I did not understand how
this<00:25:28.200><c> practical</c><00:25:28.559><c> example</c><00:25:28.980><c> works</c><00:25:29.340><c> so</c><00:25:29.760><c> could</c>

00:25:30.710 --> 00:25:30.720 align:start position:0%
this practical example works so could
 

00:25:30.720 --> 00:25:33.909 align:start position:0%
this practical example works so could
could<00:25:31.200><c> you</c><00:25:31.440><c> explain</c><00:25:31.620><c> more</c><00:25:32.039><c> like</c><00:25:32.539><c> how</c><00:25:33.539><c> could</c>

00:25:33.909 --> 00:25:33.919 align:start position:0%
could you explain more like how could
 

00:25:33.919 --> 00:25:38.269 align:start position:0%
could you explain more like how could
Mev<00:25:34.919><c> improve</c><00:25:35.580><c> the</c><00:25:36.000><c> efficiency</c><00:25:36.720><c> of</c><00:25:37.260><c> trading</c><00:25:37.860><c> on</c>

00:25:38.269 --> 00:25:38.279 align:start position:0%
Mev improve the efficiency of trading on
 

00:25:38.279 --> 00:25:40.970 align:start position:0%
Mev improve the efficiency of trading on
this<00:25:38.460><c> scenario</c><00:25:38.880><c> with</c><00:25:39.059><c> three</c><00:25:39.480><c> two</c><00:25:39.840><c> pairs</c>

00:25:40.970 --> 00:25:40.980 align:start position:0%
this scenario with three two pairs
 

00:25:40.980 --> 00:25:43.250 align:start position:0%
this scenario with three two pairs
yeah<00:25:41.580><c> so</c><00:25:41.940><c> so</c><00:25:42.240><c> think</c><00:25:42.720><c> of</c><00:25:42.840><c> it</c><00:25:42.900><c> this</c><00:25:43.020><c> way</c><00:25:43.140><c> I</c>

00:25:43.250 --> 00:25:43.260 align:start position:0%
yeah so so think of it this way I
 

00:25:43.260 --> 00:25:45.830 align:start position:0%
yeah so so think of it this way I
imagine<00:25:43.380><c> that</c><00:25:43.799><c> there's</c><00:25:44.299><c> uh</c><00:25:45.299><c> people</c><00:25:45.480><c> who</c><00:25:45.659><c> want</c>

00:25:45.830 --> 00:25:45.840 align:start position:0%
imagine that there's uh people who want
 

00:25:45.840 --> 00:25:47.690 align:start position:0%
imagine that there's uh people who want
to<00:25:45.960><c> trade</c><00:25:46.080><c> from</c><00:25:46.260><c> token</c><00:25:46.620><c> a</c><00:25:46.679><c> token</c><00:25:47.100><c> B</c><00:25:47.220><c> and</c>

00:25:47.690 --> 00:25:47.700 align:start position:0%
to trade from token a token B and
 

00:25:47.700 --> 00:25:49.789 align:start position:0%
to trade from token a token B and
there's<00:25:47.820><c> an</c><00:25:48.059><c> order</c><00:25:48.179><c> flow</c><00:25:48.480><c> of</c><00:25:48.659><c> n</c><00:25:48.840><c> orders</c><00:25:49.260><c> from</c><00:25:49.620><c> A</c>

00:25:49.789 --> 00:25:49.799 align:start position:0%
there's an order flow of n orders from A
 

00:25:49.799 --> 00:25:50.930 align:start position:0%
there's an order flow of n orders from A
to<00:25:49.980><c> B</c>

00:25:50.930 --> 00:25:50.940 align:start position:0%
to B
 

00:25:50.940 --> 00:25:52.190 align:start position:0%
to B
uh

00:25:52.190 --> 00:25:52.200 align:start position:0%
uh
 

00:25:52.200 --> 00:25:55.250 align:start position:0%
uh
if<00:25:52.679><c> I</c><00:25:52.860><c> look</c><00:25:53.100><c> at</c><00:25:53.279><c> how</c><00:25:53.700><c> to</c><00:25:53.820><c> optimally</c><00:25:54.240><c> route</c><00:25:54.600><c> the</c>

00:25:55.250 --> 00:25:55.260 align:start position:0%
if I look at how to optimally route the
 

00:25:55.260 --> 00:25:57.289 align:start position:0%
if I look at how to optimally route the
orders<00:25:55.500><c> from</c><00:25:55.679><c> A</c><00:25:55.799><c> to</c><00:25:55.919><c> B</c>

00:25:57.289 --> 00:25:57.299 align:start position:0%
orders from A to B
 

00:25:57.299 --> 00:25:59.210 align:start position:0%
orders from A to B
um<00:25:57.360><c> if</c><00:25:57.779><c> everyone</c><00:25:58.020><c> gets</c><00:25:58.440><c> routed</c><00:25:58.799><c> on</c><00:25:58.980><c> the</c><00:25:59.100><c> same</c>

00:25:59.210 --> 00:25:59.220 align:start position:0%
um if everyone gets routed on the same
 

00:25:59.220 --> 00:26:01.310 align:start position:0%
um if everyone gets routed on the same
route<00:25:59.460><c> the</c><00:26:00.059><c> price</c><00:26:00.240><c> that</c><00:26:00.539><c> everyone</c><00:26:00.659><c> pays</c><00:26:01.200><c> on</c>

00:26:01.310 --> 00:26:01.320 align:start position:0%
route the price that everyone pays on
 

00:26:01.320 --> 00:26:03.890 align:start position:0%
route the price that everyone pays on
average<00:26:01.500><c> could</c><00:26:01.919><c> be</c><00:26:02.039><c> a</c><00:26:02.159><c> lot</c><00:26:02.279><c> higher</c><00:26:02.640><c> right</c><00:26:03.299><c> if</c>

00:26:03.890 --> 00:26:03.900 align:start position:0%
average could be a lot higher right if
 

00:26:03.900 --> 00:26:05.750 align:start position:0%
average could be a lot higher right if
everyone<00:26:04.140><c> gets</c><00:26:04.440><c> routed</c><00:26:04.799><c> on</c><00:26:05.100><c> different</c><00:26:05.400><c> routes</c>

00:26:05.750 --> 00:26:05.760 align:start position:0%
everyone gets routed on different routes
 

00:26:05.760 --> 00:26:06.890 align:start position:0%
everyone gets routed on different routes
throughout<00:26:06.059><c> the</c><00:26:06.120><c> network</c><00:26:06.240><c> you</c><00:26:06.600><c> could</c><00:26:06.720><c> have</c>

00:26:06.890 --> 00:26:06.900 align:start position:0%
throughout the network you could have
 

00:26:06.900 --> 00:26:08.930 align:start position:0%
throughout the network you could have
sort<00:26:07.260><c> of</c><00:26:07.320><c> your</c><00:26:07.620><c> your</c><00:26:07.679><c> load</c><00:26:08.159><c> balancing</c><00:26:08.520><c> what</c>

00:26:08.930 --> 00:26:08.940 align:start position:0%
sort of your your load balancing what
 

00:26:08.940 --> 00:26:11.630 align:start position:0%
sort of your your load balancing what
the<00:26:09.059><c> price</c><00:26:09.240><c> impact</c><00:26:09.600><c> is</c><00:26:10.260><c> and</c><00:26:10.980><c> the</c><00:26:11.220><c> point</c><00:26:11.340><c> is</c>

00:26:11.630 --> 00:26:11.640 align:start position:0%
the price impact is and the point is
 

00:26:11.640 --> 00:26:13.610 align:start position:0%
the price impact is and the point is
that<00:26:11.940><c> the</c><00:26:12.179><c> med</c><00:26:12.419><c> Searchers</c><00:26:13.080><c> are</c><00:26:13.260><c> sort</c><00:26:13.500><c> of</c>

00:26:13.610 --> 00:26:13.620 align:start position:0%
that the med Searchers are sort of
 

00:26:13.620 --> 00:26:16.490 align:start position:0%
that the med Searchers are sort of
acting<00:26:14.580><c> in</c><00:26:14.880><c> some</c><00:26:15.240><c> weird</c><00:26:15.539><c> capacity</c><00:26:16.080><c> is</c><00:26:16.320><c> almost</c>

00:26:16.490 --> 00:26:16.500 align:start position:0%
acting in some weird capacity is almost
 

00:26:16.500 --> 00:26:18.590 align:start position:0%
acting in some weird capacity is almost
like<00:26:16.740><c> air</c><00:26:16.919><c> traffic</c><00:26:17.159><c> controllers</c><00:26:17.760><c> when</c>

00:26:18.590 --> 00:26:18.600 align:start position:0%
like air traffic controllers when
 

00:26:18.600 --> 00:26:20.149 align:start position:0%
like air traffic controllers when
there's<00:26:18.840><c> a</c><00:26:19.020><c> bunch</c><00:26:19.140><c> of</c><00:26:19.320><c> traffic</c><00:26:19.500><c> going</c><00:26:19.799><c> on</c><00:26:19.980><c> the</c>

00:26:20.149 --> 00:26:20.159 align:start position:0%
there's a bunch of traffic going on the
 

00:26:20.159 --> 00:26:22.190 align:start position:0%
there's a bunch of traffic going on the
same<00:26:20.279><c> route</c><00:26:20.460><c> it</c><00:26:20.940><c> increases</c><00:26:21.299><c> the</c><00:26:21.480><c> Mev</c><00:26:21.840><c> profit</c>

00:26:22.190 --> 00:26:22.200 align:start position:0%
same route it increases the Mev profit
 

00:26:22.200 --> 00:26:24.169 align:start position:0%
same route it increases the Mev profit
but<00:26:22.740><c> as</c><00:26:22.919><c> the</c><00:26:23.100><c> Mev</c><00:26:23.400><c> profit</c><00:26:23.760><c> goes</c><00:26:23.940><c> up</c><00:26:24.000><c> then</c>

00:26:24.169 --> 00:26:24.179 align:start position:0%
but as the Mev profit goes up then
 

00:26:24.179 --> 00:26:26.690 align:start position:0%
but as the Mev profit goes up then
people<00:26:24.360><c> start</c><00:26:24.539><c> routing</c><00:26:24.960><c> away</c><00:26:25.080><c> from</c><00:26:25.320><c> that</c><00:26:25.980><c> and</c>

00:26:26.690 --> 00:26:26.700 align:start position:0%
people start routing away from that and
 

00:26:26.700 --> 00:26:28.610 align:start position:0%
people start routing away from that and
you<00:26:27.059><c> could</c><00:26:27.120><c> effectively</c><00:26:27.659><c> think</c><00:26:27.840><c> of</c><00:26:27.960><c> it</c><00:26:28.140><c> as</c><00:26:28.320><c> a</c>

00:26:28.610 --> 00:26:28.620 align:start position:0%
you could effectively think of it as a
 

00:26:28.620 --> 00:26:30.529 align:start position:0%
you could effectively think of it as a
way<00:26:28.799><c> of</c><00:26:29.100><c> sort</c><00:26:29.460><c> of</c><00:26:29.520><c> having</c><00:26:29.700><c> a</c><00:26:29.940><c> decentralized</c>

00:26:30.529 --> 00:26:30.539 align:start position:0%
way of sort of having a decentralized
 

00:26:30.539 --> 00:26:32.630 align:start position:0%
way of sort of having a decentralized
coordinator<00:26:30.960><c> where</c><00:26:31.799><c> where</c><00:26:32.159><c> it</c><00:26:32.340><c> comes</c><00:26:32.580><c> from</c>

00:26:32.630 --> 00:26:32.640 align:start position:0%
coordinator where where it comes from
 

00:26:32.640 --> 00:26:34.789 align:start position:0%
coordinator where where it comes from
the<00:26:32.760><c> fact</c><00:26:32.940><c> that</c><00:26:33.179><c> the</c><00:26:34.020><c> more</c><00:26:34.140><c> traffic</c><00:26:34.380><c> going</c><00:26:34.620><c> on</c>

00:26:34.789 --> 00:26:34.799 align:start position:0%
the fact that the more traffic going on
 

00:26:34.799 --> 00:26:37.190 align:start position:0%
the fact that the more traffic going on
one<00:26:35.039><c> route</c><00:26:35.279><c> the</c><00:26:36.059><c> more</c><00:26:36.179><c> the</c><00:26:36.480><c> sandwich</c><00:26:36.600><c> profit</c>

00:26:37.190 --> 00:26:37.200 align:start position:0%
one route the more the sandwich profit
 

00:26:37.200 --> 00:26:39.350 align:start position:0%
one route the more the sandwich profit
but<00:26:37.620><c> then</c><00:26:37.740><c> once</c><00:26:38.100><c> people</c><00:26:38.279><c> start</c><00:26:38.640><c> realizing</c><00:26:39.299><c> the</c>

00:26:39.350 --> 00:26:39.360 align:start position:0%
but then once people start realizing the
 

00:26:39.360 --> 00:26:41.510 align:start position:0%
but then once people start realizing the
sandwich<00:26:39.539><c> profit</c><00:26:39.960><c> they</c><00:26:40.080><c> route</c><00:26:40.260><c> elsewhere</c><00:26:41.039><c> and</c>

00:26:41.510 --> 00:26:41.520 align:start position:0%
sandwich profit they route elsewhere and
 

00:26:41.520 --> 00:26:43.850 align:start position:0%
sandwich profit they route elsewhere and
so<00:26:41.700><c> this</c><00:26:42.120><c> routing</c><00:26:42.539><c> problem</c><00:26:42.840><c> is</c><00:26:43.200><c> actually</c><00:26:43.440><c> you</c>

00:26:43.850 --> 00:26:43.860 align:start position:0%
so this routing problem is actually you
 

00:26:43.860 --> 00:26:46.549 align:start position:0%
so this routing problem is actually you
know<00:26:43.919><c> the</c><00:26:44.039><c> quintessential</c><00:26:44.700><c> example</c><00:26:45.120><c> of</c><00:26:45.559><c> uh</c>

00:26:46.549 --> 00:26:46.559 align:start position:0%
know the quintessential example of uh
 

00:26:46.559 --> 00:26:48.049 align:start position:0%
know the quintessential example of uh
these<00:26:46.860><c> cases</c><00:26:47.159><c> where</c>

00:26:48.049 --> 00:26:48.059 align:start position:0%
these cases where
 

00:26:48.059 --> 00:26:50.230 align:start position:0%
these cases where
congestion<00:26:48.900><c> sort</c><00:26:49.320><c> of</c>

00:26:50.230 --> 00:26:50.240 align:start position:0%
congestion sort of
 

00:26:50.240 --> 00:26:53.149 align:start position:0%
congestion sort of
you<00:26:51.240><c> can</c><00:26:51.360><c> you</c><00:26:51.600><c> can</c><00:26:51.779><c> add</c><00:26:52.140><c> in</c><00:26:52.380><c> some</c><00:26:52.679><c> sort</c><00:26:52.799><c> of</c><00:26:52.919><c> like</c>

00:26:53.149 --> 00:26:53.159 align:start position:0%
you can you can add in some sort of like
 

00:26:53.159 --> 00:26:56.029 align:start position:0%
you can you can add in some sort of like
incentives<00:26:54.059><c> to</c><00:26:54.240><c> avoid</c><00:26:54.600><c> congestion</c><00:26:55.140><c> and</c><00:26:55.860><c> and</c>

00:26:56.029 --> 00:26:56.039 align:start position:0%
incentives to avoid congestion and and
 

00:26:56.039 --> 00:26:57.529 align:start position:0%
incentives to avoid congestion and and
you<00:26:56.220><c> know</c><00:26:56.340><c> a</c><00:26:56.460><c> lot</c><00:26:56.580><c> of</c><00:26:56.640><c> internet</c><00:26:56.820><c> routing</c>

00:26:57.529 --> 00:26:57.539 align:start position:0%
you know a lot of internet routing
 

00:26:57.539 --> 00:26:59.750 align:start position:0%
you know a lot of internet routing
traffic<00:26:57.779><c> routing</c><00:26:58.320><c> on</c><00:26:58.440><c> the</c><00:26:58.559><c> internet</c><00:26:58.620><c> a</c><00:26:59.460><c> lot</c><00:26:59.640><c> of</c>

00:26:59.750 --> 00:26:59.760 align:start position:0%
traffic routing on the internet a lot of
 

00:26:59.760 --> 00:27:01.730 align:start position:0%
traffic routing on the internet a lot of
that<00:27:00.419><c> kind</c><00:27:00.539><c> of</c><00:27:00.659><c> work</c><00:27:00.840><c> is</c><00:27:01.080><c> like</c><00:27:01.260><c> where</c><00:27:01.500><c> this</c>

00:27:01.730 --> 00:27:01.740 align:start position:0%
that kind of work is like where this
 

00:27:01.740 --> 00:27:03.649 align:start position:0%
that kind of work is like where this
initially<00:27:02.220><c> started</c><00:27:02.820><c> and</c><00:27:03.120><c> this</c><00:27:03.299><c> is</c><00:27:03.360><c> sort</c><00:27:03.539><c> of</c>

00:27:03.649 --> 00:27:03.659 align:start position:0%
initially started and this is sort of
 

00:27:03.659 --> 00:27:05.810 align:start position:0%
initially started and this is sort of
making<00:27:03.840><c> an</c><00:27:04.080><c> analog</c><00:27:04.620><c> about</c><00:27:04.799><c> here</c><00:27:04.980><c> but</c><00:27:05.279><c> the</c><00:27:05.700><c> key</c>

00:27:05.810 --> 00:27:05.820 align:start position:0%
making an analog about here but the key
 

00:27:05.820 --> 00:27:07.669 align:start position:0%
making an analog about here but the key
is<00:27:06.000><c> that</c><00:27:06.240><c> someone</c><00:27:06.779><c> is</c><00:27:07.080><c> getting</c><00:27:07.200><c> the</c><00:27:07.380><c> worst</c>

00:27:07.669 --> 00:27:07.679 align:start position:0%
is that someone is getting the worst
 

00:27:07.679 --> 00:27:09.169 align:start position:0%
is that someone is getting the worst
price<00:27:07.799><c> by</c><00:27:08.039><c> being</c><00:27:08.460><c> sandwiched</c><00:27:08.880><c> there's</c><00:27:09.000><c> no</c>

00:27:09.169 --> 00:27:09.179 align:start position:0%
price by being sandwiched there's no
 

00:27:09.179 --> 00:27:10.310 align:start position:0%
price by being sandwiched there's no
doubt

00:27:10.310 --> 00:27:10.320 align:start position:0%
doubt
 

00:27:10.320 --> 00:27:13.430 align:start position:0%
doubt
but<00:27:10.980><c> everyone</c><00:27:11.400><c> going</c><00:27:12.000><c> across</c><00:27:12.419><c> the</c><00:27:12.539><c> graph</c><00:27:12.840><c> is</c>

00:27:13.430 --> 00:27:13.440 align:start position:0%
but everyone going across the graph is
 

00:27:13.440 --> 00:27:15.409 align:start position:0%
but everyone going across the graph is
getting<00:27:13.620><c> a</c><00:27:13.860><c> better</c><00:27:14.039><c> price</c><00:27:14.279><c> on</c><00:27:14.520><c> average</c><00:27:14.700><c> and</c>

00:27:15.409 --> 00:27:15.419 align:start position:0%
getting a better price on average and
 

00:27:15.419 --> 00:27:17.149 align:start position:0%
getting a better price on average and
that<00:27:15.659><c> that's</c><00:27:15.960><c> the</c><00:27:16.200><c> social</c><00:27:16.380><c> welfare</c><00:27:16.860><c> versus</c>

00:27:17.149 --> 00:27:17.159 align:start position:0%
that that's the social welfare versus
 

00:27:17.159 --> 00:27:19.610 align:start position:0%
that that's the social welfare versus
Revenue<00:27:17.580><c> trade-off</c><00:27:18.059><c> if</c><00:27:18.480><c> that</c><00:27:18.659><c> makes</c><00:27:18.779><c> sense</c>

00:27:19.610 --> 00:27:19.620 align:start position:0%
Revenue trade-off if that makes sense
 

00:27:19.620 --> 00:27:20.990 align:start position:0%
Revenue trade-off if that makes sense
awesome<00:27:19.860><c> we</c><00:27:20.220><c> have</c><00:27:20.279><c> another</c><00:27:20.400><c> question</c><00:27:20.640><c> at</c><00:27:20.820><c> the</c>

00:27:20.990 --> 00:27:21.000 align:start position:0%
awesome we have another question at the
 

00:27:21.000 --> 00:27:21.830 align:start position:0%
awesome we have another question at the
back

00:27:21.830 --> 00:27:21.840 align:start position:0%
back
 

00:27:21.840 --> 00:27:24.049 align:start position:0%
back
hello<00:27:22.320><c> uh</c><00:27:22.980><c> good</c><00:27:23.159><c> afternoon</c><00:27:23.340><c> I</c><00:27:23.700><c> love</c><00:27:23.880><c> the</c>

00:27:24.049 --> 00:27:24.059 align:start position:0%
hello uh good afternoon I love the
 

00:27:24.059 --> 00:27:25.909 align:start position:0%
hello uh good afternoon I love the
presentation<00:27:24.419><c> as</c><00:27:24.600><c> usual</c><00:27:24.900><c> my</c><00:27:25.500><c> question</c><00:27:25.620><c> is</c>

00:27:25.909 --> 00:27:25.919 align:start position:0%
presentation as usual my question is
 

00:27:25.919 --> 00:27:28.789 align:start position:0%
presentation as usual my question is
have<00:27:26.760><c> you</c><00:27:26.940><c> made</c><00:27:27.179><c> any</c><00:27:27.480><c> studies</c><00:27:27.900><c> around</c><00:27:28.140><c> uh</c>

00:27:28.789 --> 00:27:28.799 align:start position:0%
have you made any studies around uh
 

00:27:28.799 --> 00:27:30.409 align:start position:0%
have you made any studies around uh
Central<00:27:29.100><c> Bank</c><00:27:29.340><c> digital</c><00:27:29.700><c> currencies</c><00:27:30.120><c> or</c><00:27:30.299><c> even</c>

00:27:30.409 --> 00:27:30.419 align:start position:0%
Central Bank digital currencies or even
 

00:27:30.419 --> 00:27:33.769 align:start position:0%
Central Bank digital currencies or even
Fiat<00:27:30.900><c> currencies</c><00:27:31.320><c> using</c><00:27:31.980><c> the</c><00:27:32.100><c> same</c><00:27:32.220><c> Theory</c>

00:27:33.769 --> 00:27:33.779 align:start position:0%
Fiat currencies using the same Theory
 

00:27:33.779 --> 00:27:35.750 align:start position:0%
Fiat currencies using the same Theory
yeah<00:27:34.200><c> I</c><00:27:34.440><c> mean</c><00:27:34.559><c> I</c><00:27:34.799><c> think</c><00:27:34.919><c> the</c><00:27:35.100><c> hard</c><00:27:35.220><c> part</c><00:27:35.460><c> with</c>

00:27:35.750 --> 00:27:35.760 align:start position:0%
yeah I mean I think the hard part with
 

00:27:35.760 --> 00:27:37.490 align:start position:0%
yeah I mean I think the hard part with
any<00:27:36.059><c> of</c><00:27:36.179><c> these</c><00:27:36.360><c> sort</c><00:27:36.539><c> of</c><00:27:36.600><c> like</c><00:27:36.779><c> pseudo</c>

00:27:37.490 --> 00:27:37.500 align:start position:0%
any of these sort of like pseudo
 

00:27:37.500 --> 00:27:40.070 align:start position:0%
any of these sort of like pseudo
centralized<00:27:38.100><c> Federated</c><00:27:38.580><c> type</c><00:27:39.059><c> of</c><00:27:39.179><c> things</c><00:27:39.360><c> is</c>

00:27:40.070 --> 00:27:40.080 align:start position:0%
centralized Federated type of things is
 

00:27:40.080 --> 00:27:43.789 align:start position:0%
centralized Federated type of things is
well<00:27:40.799><c> I</c><00:27:41.039><c> I</c><00:27:41.220><c> mean</c><00:27:41.659><c> the</c><00:27:42.659><c> validator</c><00:27:43.020><c> should</c><00:27:43.440><c> can</c>

00:27:43.789 --> 00:27:43.799 align:start position:0%
well I I mean the validator should can
 

00:27:43.799 --> 00:27:46.070 align:start position:0%
well I I mean the validator should can
just<00:27:44.039><c> always</c><00:27:44.340><c> do</c><00:27:44.580><c> the</c><00:27:44.700><c> Mev</c><00:27:45.120><c> themselves</c><00:27:45.539><c> right</c>

00:27:46.070 --> 00:27:46.080 align:start position:0%
just always do the Mev themselves right
 

00:27:46.080 --> 00:27:48.529 align:start position:0%
just always do the Mev themselves right
like<00:27:46.500><c> the</c><00:27:47.279><c> limit</c><00:27:47.400><c> of</c><00:27:47.760><c> of</c><00:27:47.880><c> the</c><00:27:48.120><c> centralized</c>

00:27:48.529 --> 00:27:48.539 align:start position:0%
like the limit of of the centralized
 

00:27:48.539 --> 00:27:49.789 align:start position:0%
like the limit of of the centralized
thing<00:27:48.720><c> is</c><00:27:48.840><c> like</c><00:27:49.020><c> well</c><00:27:49.200><c> what</c><00:27:49.500><c> does</c><00:27:49.620><c> Facebook</c>

00:27:49.789 --> 00:27:49.799 align:start position:0%
thing is like well what does Facebook
 

00:27:49.799 --> 00:27:50.990 align:start position:0%
thing is like well what does Facebook
what<00:27:50.039><c> are</c><00:27:50.159><c> Facebooking</c><00:27:50.580><c> Google</c><00:27:50.760><c> doing</c>

00:27:50.990 --> 00:27:51.000 align:start position:0%
what are Facebooking Google doing
 

00:27:51.000 --> 00:27:52.789 align:start position:0%
what are Facebooking Google doing
they're<00:27:51.720><c> just</c><00:27:51.900><c> doing</c><00:27:52.020><c> Mev</c><00:27:52.440><c> on</c><00:27:52.620><c> their</c><00:27:52.679><c> own</c>

00:27:52.789 --> 00:27:52.799 align:start position:0%
they're just doing Mev on their own
 

00:27:52.799 --> 00:27:54.710 align:start position:0%
they're just doing Mev on their own
auctions<00:27:53.279><c> right</c><00:27:53.520><c> they're</c><00:27:54.000><c> constructing</c><00:27:54.600><c> the</c>

00:27:54.710 --> 00:27:54.720 align:start position:0%
auctions right they're constructing the
 

00:27:54.720 --> 00:27:56.630 align:start position:0%
auctions right they're constructing the
bidding<00:27:55.020><c> strategies</c><00:27:55.380><c> for</c><00:27:55.620><c> you</c><00:27:55.799><c> they're</c><00:27:56.460><c> like</c>

00:27:56.630 --> 00:27:56.640 align:start position:0%
bidding strategies for you they're like
 

00:27:56.640 --> 00:27:58.190 align:start position:0%
bidding strategies for you they're like
we're<00:27:56.820><c> using</c><00:27:57.120><c> the</c><00:27:57.299><c> highest</c><00:27:57.600><c> machine</c><00:27:57.779><c> learning</c>

00:27:58.190 --> 00:27:58.200 align:start position:0%
we're using the highest machine learning
 

00:27:58.200 --> 00:28:00.409 align:start position:0%
we're using the highest machine learning
to<00:27:58.440><c> give</c><00:27:58.559><c> you</c><00:27:58.740><c> optimal</c><00:27:59.279><c> like</c><00:27:59.640><c> targeting</c><00:28:00.299><c> it's</c>

00:28:00.409 --> 00:28:00.419 align:start position:0%
to give you optimal like targeting it's
 

00:28:00.419 --> 00:28:01.909 align:start position:0%
to give you optimal like targeting it's
like<00:28:00.600><c> it</c><00:28:00.840><c> actually</c><00:28:00.960><c> means</c><00:28:01.320><c> actually</c><00:28:01.559><c> we're</c>

00:28:01.909 --> 00:28:01.919 align:start position:0%
like it actually means actually we're
 

00:28:01.919 --> 00:28:03.110 align:start position:0%
like it actually means actually we're
just<00:28:02.100><c> going</c><00:28:02.159><c> to</c><00:28:02.279><c> front</c><00:28:02.400><c> run</c><00:28:02.580><c> you</c><00:28:02.820><c> in</c><00:28:02.940><c> our</c>

00:28:03.110 --> 00:28:03.120 align:start position:0%
just going to front run you in our
 

00:28:03.120 --> 00:28:04.730 align:start position:0%
just going to front run you in our
auction<00:28:03.299><c> but</c><00:28:03.840><c> it's</c><00:28:03.960><c> too</c><00:28:04.200><c> complicated</c><00:28:04.559><c> to</c>

00:28:04.730 --> 00:28:04.740 align:start position:0%
auction but it's too complicated to
 

00:28:04.740 --> 00:28:05.750 align:start position:0%
auction but it's too complicated to
explain<00:28:04.860><c> how</c>

00:28:05.750 --> 00:28:05.760 align:start position:0%
explain how
 

00:28:05.760 --> 00:28:07.730 align:start position:0%
explain how
so<00:28:06.299><c> in</c><00:28:06.480><c> the</c><00:28:06.600><c> centralized</c><00:28:06.960><c> World</c><00:28:07.200><c> these</c><00:28:07.559><c> types</c>

00:28:07.730 --> 00:28:07.740 align:start position:0%
so in the centralized World these types
 

00:28:07.740 --> 00:28:08.930 align:start position:0%
so in the centralized World these types
of<00:28:07.799><c> things</c><00:28:07.980><c> are</c><00:28:08.159><c> not</c><00:28:08.340><c> that</c><00:28:08.460><c> interesting</c><00:28:08.820><c> to</c>

00:28:08.930 --> 00:28:08.940 align:start position:0%
of things are not that interesting to
 

00:28:08.940 --> 00:28:10.730 align:start position:0%
of things are not that interesting to
analyze<00:28:09.299><c> from</c><00:28:09.480><c> that</c><00:28:09.600><c> perspective</c><00:28:09.960><c> in</c><00:28:10.620><c> the</c>

00:28:10.730 --> 00:28:10.740 align:start position:0%
analyze from that perspective in the
 

00:28:10.740 --> 00:28:12.890 align:start position:0%
analyze from that perspective in the
sense<00:28:10.860><c> that</c><00:28:11.220><c> the</c><00:28:12.000><c> centralized</c><00:28:12.480><c> coordinator</c>

00:28:12.890 --> 00:28:12.900 align:start position:0%
sense that the centralized coordinator
 

00:28:12.900 --> 00:28:14.510 align:start position:0%
sense that the centralized coordinator
will<00:28:13.200><c> just</c><00:28:13.320><c> like</c><00:28:13.440><c> choose</c><00:28:13.799><c> the</c><00:28:13.980><c> most</c><00:28:14.100><c> expensive</c>

00:28:14.510 --> 00:28:14.520 align:start position:0%
will just like choose the most expensive
 

00:28:14.520 --> 00:28:16.250 align:start position:0%
will just like choose the most expensive
route<00:28:14.700><c> for</c><00:28:14.940><c> you</c><00:28:15.059><c> all</c><00:28:15.299><c> the</c><00:28:15.419><c> time</c><00:28:15.539><c> right</c><00:28:15.900><c> but</c><00:28:16.140><c> in</c>

00:28:16.250 --> 00:28:16.260 align:start position:0%
route for you all the time right but in
 

00:28:16.260 --> 00:28:17.269 align:start position:0%
route for you all the time right but in
the<00:28:16.320><c> decentralized</c><00:28:16.799><c> world</c><00:28:16.980><c> is</c><00:28:17.159><c> actually</c>

00:28:17.269 --> 00:28:17.279 align:start position:0%
the decentralized world is actually
 

00:28:17.279 --> 00:28:19.430 align:start position:0%
the decentralized world is actually
quite<00:28:17.460><c> interesting</c><00:28:17.820><c> because</c><00:28:18.059><c> the</c><00:28:18.960><c> user</c><00:28:19.260><c> has</c>

00:28:19.430 --> 00:28:19.440 align:start position:0%
quite interesting because the user has
 

00:28:19.440 --> 00:28:22.130 align:start position:0%
quite interesting because the user has
to<00:28:19.620><c> choose</c><00:28:19.919><c> their</c><00:28:20.159><c> own</c><00:28:20.340><c> way</c><00:28:21.120><c> uh</c><00:28:21.840><c> through</c><00:28:22.020><c> the</c>

00:28:22.130 --> 00:28:22.140 align:start position:0%
to choose their own way uh through the
 

00:28:22.140 --> 00:28:23.510 align:start position:0%
to choose their own way uh through the
network

00:28:23.510 --> 00:28:23.520 align:start position:0%
network
 

00:28:23.520 --> 00:28:27.289 align:start position:0%
network
um<00:28:23.580><c> so</c><00:28:23.940><c> yeah</c><00:28:24.140><c> that</c><00:28:25.140><c> that</c><00:28:25.799><c> sort</c><00:28:26.100><c> of</c><00:28:26.279><c> you</c><00:28:26.400><c> great</c>

00:28:27.289 --> 00:28:27.299 align:start position:0%
um so yeah that that sort of you great
 

00:28:27.299 --> 00:28:29.210 align:start position:0%
um so yeah that that sort of you great
well<00:28:28.080><c> one</c><00:28:28.320><c> last</c><00:28:28.500><c> question</c><00:28:28.679><c> on</c><00:28:28.860><c> that</c><00:28:28.980><c> side</c><00:28:29.039><c> and</c>

00:28:29.210 --> 00:28:29.220 align:start position:0%
well one last question on that side and
 

00:28:29.220 --> 00:28:30.529 align:start position:0%
well one last question on that side and
we'll<00:28:29.340><c> move</c><00:28:29.460><c> on</c><00:28:29.580><c> to</c><00:28:29.700><c> the</c><00:28:29.820><c> next</c><00:28:29.880><c> talk</c><00:28:30.059><c> so</c><00:28:30.360><c> please</c>

00:28:30.529 --> 00:28:30.539 align:start position:0%
we'll move on to the next talk so please
 

00:28:30.539 --> 00:28:32.810 align:start position:0%
we'll move on to the next talk so please
go<00:28:30.720><c> ahead</c><00:28:30.900><c> cool</c><00:28:31.320><c> yeah</c><00:28:31.799><c> hi</c><00:28:32.039><c> I'm</c><00:28:32.279><c> following</c><00:28:32.700><c> up</c>

00:28:32.810 --> 00:28:32.820 align:start position:0%
go ahead cool yeah hi I'm following up
 

00:28:32.820 --> 00:28:34.610 align:start position:0%
go ahead cool yeah hi I'm following up
on<00:28:32.940><c> the</c><00:28:33.059><c> first</c><00:28:33.179><c> question</c><00:28:33.419><c> in</c><00:28:34.200><c> the</c><00:28:34.320><c> brass</c>

00:28:34.610 --> 00:28:34.620 align:start position:0%
on the first question in the brass
 

00:28:34.620 --> 00:28:37.190 align:start position:0%
on the first question in the brass
example<00:28:35.100><c> the</c><00:28:35.400><c> conditions</c><00:28:35.820><c> under</c><00:28:36.000><c> which</c><00:28:36.419><c> the</c>

00:28:37.190 --> 00:28:37.200 align:start position:0%
example the conditions under which the
 

00:28:37.200 --> 00:28:39.890 align:start position:0%
example the conditions under which the
routing<00:28:38.159><c> would</c><00:28:38.400><c> actually</c><00:28:38.640><c> or</c><00:28:39.000><c> in</c><00:28:39.179><c> which</c><00:28:39.360><c> Mev</c>

00:28:39.890 --> 00:28:39.900 align:start position:0%
routing would actually or in which Mev
 

00:28:39.900 --> 00:28:41.810 align:start position:0%
routing would actually or in which Mev
would<00:28:40.080><c> be</c><00:28:40.200><c> beneficial</c><00:28:40.620><c> is</c><00:28:40.799><c> and</c><00:28:41.159><c> if</c><00:28:41.580><c> you</c><00:28:41.700><c> can</c>

00:28:41.810 --> 00:28:41.820 align:start position:0%
would be beneficial is and if you can
 

00:28:41.820 --> 00:28:43.310 align:start position:0%
would be beneficial is and if you can
teleport<00:28:42.240><c> right</c><00:28:42.480><c> these</c><00:28:42.779><c> conditions</c><00:28:43.200><c> are</c>

00:28:43.310 --> 00:28:43.320 align:start position:0%
teleport right these conditions are
 

00:28:43.320 --> 00:28:45.289 align:start position:0%
teleport right these conditions are
usually<00:28:43.679><c> not</c><00:28:43.860><c> met</c><00:28:44.100><c> what</c><00:28:44.700><c> are</c><00:28:44.820><c> the</c><00:28:44.940><c> you</c><00:28:45.120><c> said</c>

00:28:45.289 --> 00:28:45.299 align:start position:0%
usually not met what are the you said
 

00:28:45.299 --> 00:28:46.730 align:start position:0%
usually not met what are the you said
under<00:28:45.480><c> certain</c><00:28:45.779><c> conditions</c><00:28:46.200><c> this</c><00:28:46.440><c> applies</c>

00:28:46.730 --> 00:28:46.740 align:start position:0%
under certain conditions this applies
 

00:28:46.740 --> 00:28:48.470 align:start position:0%
under certain conditions this applies
for<00:28:46.919><c> MMS</c><00:28:47.400><c> what</c><00:28:47.580><c> are</c><00:28:47.700><c> those</c><00:28:47.820><c> conditions</c><00:28:48.299><c> does</c>

00:28:48.470 --> 00:28:48.480 align:start position:0%
for MMS what are those conditions does
 

00:28:48.480 --> 00:28:50.450 align:start position:0%
for MMS what are those conditions does
it<00:28:48.600><c> mean</c><00:28:48.720><c> if</c><00:28:48.840><c> I</c><00:28:49.020><c> can</c><00:28:49.140><c> trade</c><00:28:49.380><c> you</c><00:28:49.980><c> know</c><00:28:50.039><c> if</c><00:28:50.159><c> I</c><00:28:50.340><c> can</c>

00:28:50.450 --> 00:28:50.460 align:start position:0%
it mean if I can trade you know if I can
 

00:28:50.460 --> 00:28:53.930 align:start position:0%
it mean if I can trade you know if I can
print<00:28:51.000><c> free</c><00:28:51.240><c> money</c><00:28:51.539><c> or</c><00:28:51.960><c> trade</c><00:28:52.440><c> it</c><00:28:52.940><c> unlimited</c>

00:28:53.930 --> 00:28:53.940 align:start position:0%
print free money or trade it unlimited
 

00:28:53.940 --> 00:28:55.490 align:start position:0%
print free money or trade it unlimited
or<00:28:54.059><c> zero</c><00:28:54.419><c> exchange</c><00:28:54.720><c> rate</c><00:28:54.840><c> or</c><00:28:55.140><c> what</c><00:28:55.260><c> are</c><00:28:55.380><c> the</c>

00:28:55.490 --> 00:28:55.500 align:start position:0%
or zero exchange rate or what are the
 

00:28:55.500 --> 00:28:57.350 align:start position:0%
or zero exchange rate or what are the
conditions<00:28:55.860><c> in</c><00:28:56.039><c> which</c><00:28:56.220><c> no</c><00:28:56.640><c> yeah</c><00:28:57.000><c> actually</c>

00:28:57.350 --> 00:28:57.360 align:start position:0%
conditions in which no yeah actually
 

00:28:57.360 --> 00:28:59.810 align:start position:0%
conditions in which no yeah actually
that's<00:28:57.779><c> a</c><00:28:58.020><c> good</c><00:28:58.200><c> point</c><00:28:58.320><c> so</c><00:28:58.500><c> so</c><00:28:58.740><c> the</c><00:28:59.039><c> the</c><00:28:59.159><c> zero</c>

00:28:59.810 --> 00:28:59.820 align:start position:0%
that's a good point so so the the zero
 

00:28:59.820 --> 00:29:03.110 align:start position:0%
that's a good point so so the the zero
uh<00:29:00.240><c> is</c><00:29:00.480><c> in</c><00:29:00.659><c> the</c><00:29:00.900><c> traffic</c><00:29:01.440><c> example</c><00:29:01.980><c> in</c><00:29:02.640><c> the</c><00:29:02.760><c> amm</c>

00:29:03.110 --> 00:29:03.120 align:start position:0%
uh is in the traffic example in the amm
 

00:29:03.120 --> 00:29:04.549 align:start position:0%
uh is in the traffic example in the amm
example<00:29:03.480><c> you</c><00:29:03.720><c> can</c><00:29:03.779><c> never</c><00:29:03.900><c> have</c><00:29:04.080><c> zero</c>

00:29:04.549 --> 00:29:04.559 align:start position:0%
example you can never have zero
 

00:29:04.559 --> 00:29:06.590 align:start position:0%
example you can never have zero
effectively<00:29:05.340><c> in</c><00:29:05.460><c> that</c><00:29:05.700><c> Edge</c><00:29:06.120><c> there's</c><00:29:06.419><c> always</c>

00:29:06.590 --> 00:29:06.600 align:start position:0%
effectively in that Edge there's always
 

00:29:06.600 --> 00:29:09.110 align:start position:0%
effectively in that Edge there's always
some<00:29:06.840><c> amount</c><00:29:07.080><c> of</c><00:29:07.200><c> liquidity</c><00:29:07.620><c> uh</c><00:29:08.580><c> price</c><00:29:08.760><c> impact</c>

00:29:09.110 --> 00:29:09.120 align:start position:0%
some amount of liquidity uh price impact
 

00:29:09.120 --> 00:29:13.310 align:start position:0%
some amount of liquidity uh price impact
unless<00:29:09.840><c> it's</c><00:29:10.020><c> like</c><00:29:10.200><c> you</c><00:29:10.440><c> know</c><00:29:10.559><c> a</c><00:29:11.220><c> linear</c><00:29:11.700><c> amm</c><00:29:12.659><c> I</c>

00:29:13.310 --> 00:29:13.320 align:start position:0%
unless it's like you know a linear amm I
 

00:29:13.320 --> 00:29:15.830 align:start position:0%
unless it's like you know a linear amm I
I<00:29:13.440><c> think</c><00:29:13.620><c> the</c><00:29:14.039><c> main</c><00:29:14.159><c> thing</c><00:29:14.400><c> we</c><00:29:14.640><c> showed</c><00:29:15.059><c> is</c><00:29:15.539><c> that</c>

00:29:15.830 --> 00:29:15.840 align:start position:0%
I think the main thing we showed is that
 

00:29:15.840 --> 00:29:17.930 align:start position:0%
I think the main thing we showed is that
the<00:29:16.260><c> liquidity</c><00:29:16.679><c> difference</c><00:29:16.980><c> on</c><00:29:17.700><c> certain</c>

00:29:17.930 --> 00:29:17.940 align:start position:0%
the liquidity difference on certain
 

00:29:17.940 --> 00:29:19.909 align:start position:0%
the liquidity difference on certain
edges<00:29:18.360><c> on</c><00:29:18.539><c> that</c><00:29:18.659><c> graph</c><00:29:18.960><c> relative</c><00:29:19.559><c> to</c><00:29:19.740><c> the</c>

00:29:19.909 --> 00:29:19.919 align:start position:0%
edges on that graph relative to the
 

00:29:19.919 --> 00:29:22.310 align:start position:0%
edges on that graph relative to the
center<00:29:20.039><c> edge</c><00:29:20.279><c> has</c><00:29:20.580><c> to</c><00:29:20.700><c> be</c><00:29:20.820><c> large</c><00:29:21.059><c> so</c><00:29:21.899><c> it's</c><00:29:22.020><c> not</c>

00:29:22.310 --> 00:29:22.320 align:start position:0%
center edge has to be large so it's not
 

00:29:22.320 --> 00:29:23.930 align:start position:0%
center edge has to be large so it's not
necessarily<00:29:22.799><c> that</c><00:29:22.980><c> it's</c><00:29:23.159><c> saying</c><00:29:23.460><c> that</c><00:29:23.640><c> hey</c>

00:29:23.930 --> 00:29:23.940 align:start position:0%
necessarily that it's saying that hey
 

00:29:23.940 --> 00:29:25.310 align:start position:0%
necessarily that it's saying that hey
you're<00:29:24.179><c> teleporting</c><00:29:24.659><c> or</c><00:29:24.779><c> it's</c><00:29:24.960><c> like</c><00:29:25.080><c> you're</c>

00:29:25.310 --> 00:29:25.320 align:start position:0%
you're teleporting or it's like you're
 

00:29:25.320 --> 00:29:26.889 align:start position:0%
you're teleporting or it's like you're
you're<00:29:25.559><c> you</c><00:29:25.860><c> have</c><00:29:25.980><c> some</c><00:29:26.220><c> sort</c><00:29:26.340><c> of</c><00:29:26.460><c> like</c>

00:29:26.889 --> 00:29:26.899 align:start position:0%
you're you have some sort of like
 

00:29:26.899 --> 00:29:29.210 align:start position:0%
you're you have some sort of like
non-balanced<00:29:27.899><c> budget</c><00:29:28.200><c> Condition</c><00:29:28.440><c> it's</c>

00:29:29.210 --> 00:29:29.220 align:start position:0%
non-balanced budget Condition it's
 

00:29:29.220 --> 00:29:30.529 align:start position:0%
non-balanced budget Condition it's
actually<00:29:29.399><c> just</c><00:29:29.760><c> that</c><00:29:29.940><c> the</c><00:29:30.120><c> liquidity</c>

00:29:30.529 --> 00:29:30.539 align:start position:0%
actually just that the liquidity
 

00:29:30.539 --> 00:29:32.269 align:start position:0%
actually just that the liquidity
relative<00:29:31.200><c> liquidity</c><00:29:31.679><c> differences</c><00:29:32.100><c> on</c>

00:29:32.269 --> 00:29:32.279 align:start position:0%
relative liquidity differences on
 

00:29:32.279 --> 00:29:34.250 align:start position:0%
relative liquidity differences on
different<00:29:32.460><c> edges</c><00:29:32.820><c> has</c><00:29:33.000><c> to</c><00:29:33.120><c> be</c><00:29:33.179><c> high</c><00:29:33.360><c> and</c><00:29:34.080><c> that</c>

00:29:34.250 --> 00:29:34.260 align:start position:0%
different edges has to be high and that
 

00:29:34.260 --> 00:29:36.230 align:start position:0%
different edges has to be high and that
those<00:29:34.440><c> are</c><00:29:34.620><c> the</c><00:29:34.740><c> conditions</c><00:29:35.220><c> and</c>

00:29:36.230 --> 00:29:36.240 align:start position:0%
those are the conditions and
 

00:29:36.240 --> 00:29:38.690 align:start position:0%
those are the conditions and
you<00:29:36.779><c> know</c><00:29:36.899><c> I'd</c><00:29:37.140><c> say</c><00:29:37.320><c> our</c><00:29:37.620><c> proof</c><00:29:38.279><c> is</c><00:29:38.399><c> pretty</c>

00:29:38.690 --> 00:29:38.700 align:start position:0%
you know I'd say our proof is pretty
 

00:29:38.700 --> 00:29:41.570 align:start position:0%
you know I'd say our proof is pretty
pessimistic<00:29:39.480><c> in</c><00:29:40.020><c> our</c><00:29:40.260><c> conditions</c><00:29:40.740><c> and</c><00:29:41.220><c> there</c>

00:29:41.570 --> 00:29:41.580 align:start position:0%
pessimistic in our conditions and there
 

00:29:41.580 --> 00:29:43.490 align:start position:0%
pessimistic in our conditions and there
definitely<00:29:41.820><c> were</c><00:29:42.000><c> ways</c><00:29:42.299><c> of</c><00:29:42.419><c> like</c><00:29:42.539><c> getting</c>

00:29:43.490 --> 00:29:43.500 align:start position:0%
definitely were ways of like getting
 

00:29:43.500 --> 00:29:46.549 align:start position:0%
definitely were ways of like getting
much<00:29:43.980><c> better</c><00:29:44.100><c> bounds</c><00:29:44.580><c> on</c><00:29:44.700><c> it</c><00:29:45.299><c> um</c><00:29:45.840><c> yeah</c><00:29:46.260><c> awesome</c>

00:29:46.549 --> 00:29:46.559 align:start position:0%
much better bounds on it um yeah awesome
 

00:29:46.559 --> 00:29:48.409 align:start position:0%
much better bounds on it um yeah awesome
thank<00:29:47.220><c> you</c><00:29:47.340><c> so</c><00:29:47.460><c> much</c><00:29:47.640><c> please</c><00:29:48.000><c> give</c><00:29:48.179><c> a</c><00:29:48.299><c> big</c>

00:29:48.409 --> 00:29:48.419 align:start position:0%
thank you so much please give a big
 

00:29:48.419 --> 00:29:49.890 align:start position:0%
thank you so much please give a big
round<00:29:48.539><c> of</c><00:29:48.659><c> applause</c><00:29:48.960><c> for</c><00:29:49.080><c> tarun</c>

00:29:49.890 --> 00:29:49.900 align:start position:0%
round of applause for tarun
 

00:29:49.900 --> 00:29:54.589 align:start position:0%
round of applause for tarun
[Applause]

