WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:01.160 --> 00:00:06.690 align:start position:0%
 
[Music]

00:00:06.690 --> 00:00:06.700 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:00:06.700 --> 00:00:13.270 align:start position:0%
 
[Music]

00:00:13.270 --> 00:00:13.280 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:00:13.280 --> 00:00:17.029 align:start position:0%
 
hello<00:00:13.799><c> uh</c><00:00:13.920><c> can</c><00:00:14.040><c> you</c><00:00:14.200><c> all</c><00:00:14.440><c> hear</c><00:00:14.639><c> me</c><00:00:15.200><c> okay</c><00:00:15.799><c> uh</c><00:00:16.119><c> I'm</c>

00:00:17.029 --> 00:00:17.039 align:start position:0%
hello uh can you all hear me okay uh I'm
 

00:00:17.039 --> 00:00:18.950 align:start position:0%
hello uh can you all hear me okay uh I'm
Gabriel<00:00:18.039><c> and</c><00:00:18.199><c> today</c><00:00:18.439><c> we're</c><00:00:18.600><c> going</c><00:00:18.720><c> to</c><00:00:18.800><c> be</c>

00:00:18.950 --> 00:00:18.960 align:start position:0%
Gabriel and today we're going to be
 

00:00:18.960 --> 00:00:20.390 align:start position:0%
Gabriel and today we're going to be
talking<00:00:19.240><c> fraud</c><00:00:19.600><c> proofs</c><00:00:19.920><c> you</c><00:00:20.000><c> know</c><00:00:20.160><c> like</c>

00:00:20.390 --> 00:00:20.400 align:start position:0%
talking fraud proofs you know like
 

00:00:20.400 --> 00:00:22.710 align:start position:0%
talking fraud proofs you know like
another<00:00:20.760><c> session</c><00:00:21.080><c> about</c><00:00:21.240><c> fraud</c><00:00:21.560><c> proofs</c><00:00:22.480><c> uh</c><00:00:22.600><c> we</c>

00:00:22.710 --> 00:00:22.720 align:start position:0%
another session about fraud proofs uh we
 

00:00:22.720 --> 00:00:25.470 align:start position:0%
another session about fraud proofs uh we
will<00:00:22.920><c> present</c><00:00:23.240><c> a</c><00:00:23.400><c> new</c><00:00:23.599><c> technique</c><00:00:24.439><c> uh</c><00:00:24.680><c> that</c>

00:00:25.470 --> 00:00:25.480 align:start position:0%
will present a new technique uh that
 

00:00:25.480 --> 00:00:27.189 align:start position:0%
will present a new technique uh that
we've<00:00:25.800><c> just</c><00:00:26.039><c> published</c><00:00:26.519><c> in</c><00:00:26.640><c> fact</c><00:00:26.920><c> so</c><00:00:27.039><c> it's</c>

00:00:27.189 --> 00:00:27.199 align:start position:0%
we've just published in fact so it's
 

00:00:27.199 --> 00:00:28.630 align:start position:0%
we've just published in fact so it's
been<00:00:27.320><c> in</c><00:00:27.400><c> the</c><00:00:27.519><c> oven</c><00:00:27.720><c> for</c><00:00:28.000><c> quite</c><00:00:28.160><c> a</c><00:00:28.279><c> while</c><00:00:28.519><c> and</c>

00:00:28.630 --> 00:00:28.640 align:start position:0%
been in the oven for quite a while and
 

00:00:28.640 --> 00:00:30.990 align:start position:0%
been in the oven for quite a while and
I'm<00:00:28.800><c> quite</c><00:00:29.000><c> excited</c><00:00:29.359><c> to</c><00:00:29.480><c> show</c><00:00:29.640><c> it</c><00:00:29.759><c> to</c><00:00:30.199><c> you</c><00:00:30.320><c> all</c>

00:00:30.990 --> 00:00:31.000 align:start position:0%
I'm quite excited to show it to you all
 

00:00:31.000 --> 00:00:32.950 align:start position:0%
I'm quite excited to show it to you all
but<00:00:31.119><c> the</c><00:00:31.279><c> bottom</c><00:00:31.599><c> line</c><00:00:31.800><c> is</c><00:00:31.960><c> that</c><00:00:32.200><c> we</c><00:00:32.399><c> weren't</c>

00:00:32.950 --> 00:00:32.960 align:start position:0%
but the bottom line is that we weren't
 

00:00:32.960 --> 00:00:36.110 align:start position:0%
but the bottom line is that we weren't
quite<00:00:33.719><c> happy</c><00:00:34.719><c> uh</c><00:00:34.960><c> on</c><00:00:35.320><c> the</c><00:00:35.520><c> current</c><00:00:35.840><c> set</c><00:00:36.000><c> of</c>

00:00:36.110 --> 00:00:36.120 align:start position:0%
quite happy uh on the current set of
 

00:00:36.120 --> 00:00:38.069 align:start position:0%
quite happy uh on the current set of
fraud<00:00:36.399><c> proof</c><00:00:36.680><c> so</c><00:00:36.800><c> we</c><00:00:36.960><c> created</c><00:00:37.399><c> a</c><00:00:37.520><c> new</c>

00:00:38.069 --> 00:00:38.079 align:start position:0%
fraud proof so we created a new
 

00:00:38.079 --> 00:00:40.069 align:start position:0%
fraud proof so we created a new
algorithm<00:00:39.079><c> uh</c><00:00:39.200><c> so</c><00:00:39.320><c> first</c><00:00:39.520><c> I</c><00:00:39.640><c> like</c><00:00:39.760><c> to</c><00:00:39.879><c> thank</c>

00:00:40.069 --> 00:00:40.079 align:start position:0%
algorithm uh so first I like to thank
 

00:00:40.079 --> 00:00:42.029 align:start position:0%
algorithm uh so first I like to thank
caresia<00:00:40.559><c> for</c><00:00:40.680><c> all</c><00:00:40.760><c> the</c><00:00:40.879><c> grants</c><00:00:41.280><c> provided</c><00:00:41.879><c> and</c>

00:00:42.029 --> 00:00:42.039 align:start position:0%
caresia for all the grants provided and
 

00:00:42.039 --> 00:00:44.069 align:start position:0%
caresia for all the grants provided and
also<00:00:42.320><c> my</c><00:00:42.520><c> co-authors</c><00:00:43.160><c> austo</c><00:00:43.640><c> who</c><00:00:43.719><c> is</c><00:00:43.800><c> here</c><00:00:43.920><c> on</c>

00:00:44.069 --> 00:00:44.079 align:start position:0%
also my co-authors austo who is here on
 

00:00:44.079 --> 00:00:46.830 align:start position:0%
also my co-authors austo who is here on
the<00:00:44.160><c> audience</c><00:00:45.039><c> and</c><00:00:45.200><c> Diego</c><00:00:46.160><c> uh</c><00:00:46.239><c> so</c><00:00:46.520><c> thank</c><00:00:46.680><c> you</c>

00:00:46.830 --> 00:00:46.840 align:start position:0%
the audience and Diego uh so thank you
 

00:00:46.840 --> 00:00:49.029 align:start position:0%
the audience and Diego uh so thank you
all<00:00:47.600><c> and</c><00:00:47.719><c> also</c><00:00:47.920><c> to</c><00:00:48.039><c> all</c><00:00:48.160><c> the</c><00:00:48.280><c> organizers</c><00:00:48.879><c> of</c>

00:00:49.029 --> 00:00:49.039 align:start position:0%
all and also to all the organizers of
 

00:00:49.039 --> 00:00:51.630 align:start position:0%
all and also to all the organizers of
this<00:00:49.199><c> amazing</c><00:00:49.600><c> event</c><00:00:50.559><c> um</c><00:00:50.920><c> yeah</c><00:00:51.120><c> so</c><00:00:51.320><c> first</c><00:00:51.559><c> I</c>

00:00:51.630 --> 00:00:51.640 align:start position:0%
this amazing event um yeah so first I
 

00:00:51.640 --> 00:00:53.950 align:start position:0%
this amazing event um yeah so first I
want<00:00:51.760><c> to</c><00:00:51.960><c> get</c><00:00:52.160><c> this</c><00:00:52.359><c> question</c><00:00:52.800><c> out</c><00:00:52.960><c> of</c><00:00:53.120><c> the</c><00:00:53.280><c> way</c>

00:00:53.950 --> 00:00:53.960 align:start position:0%
want to get this question out of the way
 

00:00:53.960 --> 00:00:57.510 align:start position:0%
want to get this question out of the way
the<00:00:54.120><c> Zeki</c><00:00:54.760><c> question</c><00:00:55.760><c> uh</c><00:00:56.039><c> it</c><00:00:56.239><c> may</c><00:00:56.480><c> feel</c><00:00:56.920><c> that</c>

00:00:57.510 --> 00:00:57.520 align:start position:0%
the Zeki question uh it may feel that
 

00:00:57.520 --> 00:00:59.189 align:start position:0%
the Zeki question uh it may feel that
when<00:00:57.640><c> we're</c><00:00:57.879><c> talking</c><00:00:58.160><c> about</c><00:00:58.359><c> fraud</c><00:00:58.719><c> proofs</c>

00:00:59.189 --> 00:00:59.199 align:start position:0%
when we're talking about fraud proofs
 

00:00:59.199 --> 00:01:01.630 align:start position:0%
when we're talking about fraud proofs
that<00:00:59.320><c> we're</c><00:00:59.480><c> trying</c><00:00:59.680><c> to</c><00:01:00.039><c> figure</c><00:01:00.320><c> out</c><00:01:01.079><c> the</c><00:01:01.280><c> best</c>

00:01:01.630 --> 00:01:01.640 align:start position:0%
that we're trying to figure out the best
 

00:01:01.640 --> 00:01:05.030 align:start position:0%
that we're trying to figure out the best
grass<00:01:02.640><c> to</c><00:01:02.840><c> feed</c><00:01:03.120><c> our</c><00:01:03.600><c> horses</c><00:01:04.600><c> uh</c><00:01:04.760><c> and</c><00:01:04.839><c> I</c><00:01:04.920><c> want</c>

00:01:05.030 --> 00:01:05.040 align:start position:0%
grass to feed our horses uh and I want
 

00:01:05.040 --> 00:01:06.590 align:start position:0%
grass to feed our horses uh and I want
to<00:01:05.239><c> push</c><00:01:05.479><c> back</c><00:01:05.680><c> against</c><00:01:05.920><c> that</c><00:01:06.119><c> notion</c><00:01:06.439><c> you</c>

00:01:06.590 --> 00:01:06.600 align:start position:0%
to push back against that notion you
 

00:01:06.600 --> 00:01:08.670 align:start position:0%
to push back against that notion you
know<00:01:06.840><c> because</c><00:01:07.680><c> there</c><00:01:07.799><c> are</c><00:01:07.960><c> no</c><00:01:08.080><c> silver</c><00:01:08.360><c> bullets</c>

00:01:08.670 --> 00:01:08.680 align:start position:0%
know because there are no silver bullets
 

00:01:08.680 --> 00:01:11.310 align:start position:0%
know because there are no silver bullets
you<00:01:08.759><c> know</c><00:01:08.920><c> ZK</c><00:01:09.240><c> is</c><00:01:09.360><c> not</c><00:01:09.880><c> panaca</c><00:01:10.880><c> uh</c><00:01:11.040><c> when</c><00:01:11.159><c> you</c>

00:01:11.310 --> 00:01:11.320 align:start position:0%
you know ZK is not panaca uh when you
 

00:01:11.320 --> 00:01:12.830 align:start position:0%
you know ZK is not panaca uh when you
compare<00:01:11.640><c> them</c><00:01:11.799><c> with</c><00:01:11.960><c> front</c><00:01:12.240><c> proofs</c><00:01:12.520><c> there's</c><00:01:12.680><c> a</c>

00:01:12.830 --> 00:01:12.840 align:start position:0%
compare them with front proofs there's a
 

00:01:12.840 --> 00:01:16.109 align:start position:0%
compare them with front proofs there's a
sharp<00:01:13.200><c> contrast</c><00:01:13.640><c> in</c><00:01:13.840><c> throughput</c><00:01:14.479><c> and</c><00:01:15.119><c> costs</c>

00:01:16.109 --> 00:01:16.119 align:start position:0%
sharp contrast in throughput and costs
 

00:01:16.119 --> 00:01:18.310 align:start position:0%
sharp contrast in throughput and costs
uh<00:01:16.280><c> which</c><00:01:16.439><c> means</c><00:01:16.840><c> that</c><00:01:17.320><c> depending</c><00:01:17.680><c> on</c><00:01:17.799><c> the</c>

00:01:18.310 --> 00:01:18.320 align:start position:0%
uh which means that depending on the
 

00:01:18.320 --> 00:01:21.030 align:start position:0%
uh which means that depending on the
application<00:01:19.320><c> you're</c><00:01:19.520><c> going</c><00:01:19.640><c> to</c><00:01:19.799><c> prefer</c><00:01:20.720><c> the</c>

00:01:21.030 --> 00:01:21.040 align:start position:0%
application you're going to prefer the
 

00:01:21.040 --> 00:01:22.350 align:start position:0%
application you're going to prefer the
different<00:01:21.360><c> algorithms</c><00:01:21.920><c> you</c><00:01:22.040><c> know</c><00:01:22.159><c> there</c>

00:01:22.350 --> 00:01:22.360 align:start position:0%
different algorithms you know there
 

00:01:22.360 --> 00:01:23.670 align:start position:0%
different algorithms you know there
going<00:01:22.439><c> to</c><00:01:22.560><c> be</c><00:01:22.680><c> trade-offs</c><00:01:23.200><c> in</c><00:01:23.320><c> the</c><00:01:23.439><c> end</c>

00:01:23.670 --> 00:01:23.680 align:start position:0%
going to be trade-offs in the end
 

00:01:23.680 --> 00:01:25.429 align:start position:0%
going to be trade-offs in the end
there's<00:01:23.960><c> no</c><00:01:24.079><c> silver</c><00:01:24.400><c> bullets</c><00:01:25.079><c> that's</c><00:01:25.320><c> the</c>

00:01:25.429 --> 00:01:25.439 align:start position:0%
there's no silver bullets that's the
 

00:01:25.439 --> 00:01:28.030 align:start position:0%
there's no silver bullets that's the
point<00:01:25.720><c> I</c><00:01:25.799><c> wanted</c><00:01:26.079><c> to</c><00:01:26.280><c> get</c><00:01:26.560><c> across</c><00:01:27.520><c> so</c><00:01:27.720><c> now</c>

00:01:28.030 --> 00:01:28.040 align:start position:0%
point I wanted to get across so now
 

00:01:28.040 --> 00:01:31.350 align:start position:0%
point I wanted to get across so now
let's<00:01:28.280><c> focus</c><00:01:28.799><c> on</c><00:01:29.000><c> fraud</c><00:01:29.400><c> proofs</c>

00:01:31.350 --> 00:01:31.360 align:start position:0%
let's focus on fraud proofs
 

00:01:31.360 --> 00:01:33.789 align:start position:0%
let's focus on fraud proofs
yeah<00:01:32.360><c> the</c><00:01:32.520><c> agenda</c><00:01:32.840><c> today</c><00:01:33.159><c> is</c><00:01:33.320><c> that</c><00:01:33.520><c> they're</c>

00:01:33.789 --> 00:01:33.799 align:start position:0%
yeah the agenda today is that they're
 

00:01:33.799 --> 00:01:35.630 align:start position:0%
yeah the agenda today is that they're
actually<00:01:34.040><c> quite</c><00:01:34.240><c> hard</c><00:01:34.439><c> to</c><00:01:34.640><c> get</c><00:01:35.280><c> I</c><00:01:35.399><c> hope</c><00:01:35.520><c> you</c>

00:01:35.630 --> 00:01:35.640 align:start position:0%
actually quite hard to get I hope you
 

00:01:35.640 --> 00:01:38.749 align:start position:0%
actually quite hard to get I hope you
got<00:01:35.840><c> that</c><00:01:36.000><c> notion</c><00:01:36.280><c> from</c><00:01:36.479><c> Lucas</c><00:01:37.240><c> St</c><00:01:38.240><c> uh</c><00:01:38.479><c> all</c><00:01:38.640><c> the</c>

00:01:38.749 --> 00:01:38.759 align:start position:0%
got that notion from Lucas St uh all the
 

00:01:38.759 --> 00:01:40.630 align:start position:0%
got that notion from Lucas St uh all the
previous<00:01:39.079><c> attempts</c><00:01:39.439><c> were</c><00:01:39.640><c> either</c><00:01:39.960><c> unsafe</c>

00:01:40.630 --> 00:01:40.640 align:start position:0%
previous attempts were either unsafe
 

00:01:40.640 --> 00:01:43.670 align:start position:0%
previous attempts were either unsafe
centralized<00:01:41.280><c> or</c><00:01:41.439><c> slow</c><00:01:42.320><c> and</c><00:01:42.520><c> Dave</c><00:01:42.799><c> is</c>

00:01:43.670 --> 00:01:43.680 align:start position:0%
centralized or slow and Dave is
 

00:01:43.680 --> 00:01:46.590 align:start position:0%
centralized or slow and Dave is
not<00:01:44.680><c> yeah</c><00:01:44.960><c> so</c><00:01:45.240><c> fraud</c><00:01:45.560><c> proofs</c><00:01:45.799><c> are</c><00:01:45.960><c> in</c><00:01:46.040><c> a</c><00:01:46.200><c> diff</c>

00:01:46.590 --> 00:01:46.600 align:start position:0%
not yeah so fraud proofs are in a diff
 

00:01:46.600 --> 00:01:48.950 align:start position:0%
not yeah so fraud proofs are in a diff
uh<00:01:46.960><c> difficult</c><00:01:47.200><c> position</c><00:01:47.640><c> right</c><00:01:47.840><c> now</c><00:01:48.680><c> so</c><00:01:48.840><c> we</c>

00:01:48.950 --> 00:01:48.960 align:start position:0%
uh difficult position right now so we
 

00:01:48.960 --> 00:01:50.350 align:start position:0%
uh difficult position right now so we
have<00:01:49.119><c> the</c><00:01:49.280><c> pressure</c><00:01:49.680><c> you</c><00:01:49.799><c> know</c><00:01:49.960><c> on</c><00:01:50.040><c> the</c><00:01:50.200><c> top</c>

00:01:50.350 --> 00:01:50.360 align:start position:0%
have the pressure you know on the top
 

00:01:50.360 --> 00:01:52.429 align:start position:0%
have the pressure you know on the top
there's<00:01:50.600><c> vitalic</c><00:01:51.000><c> Suite</c><00:01:52.000><c> essentially</c>

00:01:52.429 --> 00:01:52.439 align:start position:0%
there's vitalic Suite essentially
 

00:01:52.439 --> 00:01:55.109 align:start position:0%
there's vitalic Suite essentially
calling<00:01:52.719><c> for</c><00:01:53.040><c> stricter</c><00:01:53.640><c> standards</c><00:01:54.640><c> but</c><00:01:54.880><c> if</c><00:01:55.000><c> we</c>

00:01:55.109 --> 00:01:55.119 align:start position:0%
calling for stricter standards but if we
 

00:01:55.119 --> 00:01:57.749 align:start position:0%
calling for stricter standards but if we
look<00:01:55.280><c> at</c><00:01:55.399><c> L2</c><00:01:55.840><c> beat</c><00:01:56.360><c> we</c><00:01:56.479><c> don't</c><00:01:56.680><c> see</c><00:01:56.880><c> full</c><00:01:57.200><c> pizzas</c>

00:01:57.749 --> 00:01:57.759 align:start position:0%
look at L2 beat we don't see full pizzas
 

00:01:57.759 --> 00:02:00.389 align:start position:0%
look at L2 beat we don't see full pizzas
right<00:01:57.960><c> so</c><00:01:58.119><c> we</c><00:01:58.240><c> have</c><00:01:58.479><c> the</c><00:01:59.200><c> pressure</c><00:02:00.079><c> but</c><00:02:00.280><c> we</c>

00:02:00.389 --> 00:02:00.399 align:start position:0%
right so we have the pressure but we
 

00:02:00.399 --> 00:02:02.670 align:start position:0%
right so we have the pressure but we
don't<00:02:00.680><c> have</c><00:02:01.039><c> implementations</c><00:02:01.719><c> coming</c><00:02:02.560><c> and</c>

00:02:02.670 --> 00:02:02.680 align:start position:0%
don't have implementations coming and
 

00:02:02.680 --> 00:02:04.429 align:start position:0%
don't have implementations coming and
the<00:02:02.840><c> reason</c><00:02:03.159><c> for</c><00:02:03.399><c> that</c><00:02:03.759><c> is</c><00:02:03.920><c> because</c><00:02:04.159><c> it's</c>

00:02:04.429 --> 00:02:04.439 align:start position:0%
the reason for that is because it's
 

00:02:04.439 --> 00:02:06.510 align:start position:0%
the reason for that is because it's
actually<00:02:04.759><c> quite</c><00:02:04.920><c> hard</c><00:02:05.119><c> to</c><00:02:05.320><c> get</c><00:02:05.479><c> fraud</c><00:02:05.840><c> proofs</c>

00:02:06.510 --> 00:02:06.520 align:start position:0%
actually quite hard to get fraud proofs
 

00:02:06.520 --> 00:02:09.109 align:start position:0%
actually quite hard to get fraud proofs
right<00:02:07.399><c> and</c><00:02:07.560><c> by</c><00:02:07.880><c> right</c><00:02:08.280><c> I</c><00:02:08.360><c> mean</c><00:02:08.599><c> essentially</c>

00:02:09.109 --> 00:02:09.119 align:start position:0%
right and by right I mean essentially
 

00:02:09.119 --> 00:02:11.510 align:start position:0%
right and by right I mean essentially
three<00:02:09.360><c> properties</c><00:02:09.840><c> the</c><00:02:09.959><c> first</c><00:02:10.200><c> who</c><00:02:10.399><c> are</c><00:02:10.599><c> there</c>

00:02:11.510 --> 00:02:11.520 align:start position:0%
three properties the first who are there
 

00:02:11.520 --> 00:02:13.869 align:start position:0%
three properties the first who are there
um<00:02:11.840><c> I</c><00:02:11.920><c> want</c><00:02:12.319><c> you</c><00:02:12.840><c> to</c><00:02:13.000><c> be</c><00:02:13.160><c> able</c><00:02:13.360><c> to</c><00:02:13.520><c> become</c><00:02:13.720><c> a</c>

00:02:13.869 --> 00:02:13.879 align:start position:0%
um I want you to be able to become a
 

00:02:13.879 --> 00:02:16.630 align:start position:0%
um I want you to be able to become a
validator<00:02:14.879><c> I</c><00:02:15.000><c> want</c><00:02:15.319><c> you</c><00:02:15.519><c> to</c><00:02:15.640><c> be</c><00:02:15.800><c> able</c><00:02:16.080><c> to</c><00:02:16.360><c> go</c>

00:02:16.630 --> 00:02:16.640 align:start position:0%
validator I want you to be able to go
 

00:02:16.640 --> 00:02:19.670 align:start position:0%
validator I want you to be able to go
there<00:02:17.519><c> without</c><00:02:17.840><c> a</c><00:02:18.239><c> supercomputer</c><00:02:19.239><c> without</c>

00:02:19.670 --> 00:02:19.680 align:start position:0%
there without a supercomputer without
 

00:02:19.680 --> 00:02:22.830 align:start position:0%
there without a supercomputer without
huge<00:02:20.000><c> ons</c><00:02:20.879><c> and</c><00:02:21.080><c> be</c><00:02:21.280><c> able</c><00:02:21.640><c> to</c><00:02:21.879><c> participate</c><00:02:22.720><c> in</c>

00:02:22.830 --> 00:02:22.840 align:start position:0%
huge ons and be able to participate in
 

00:02:22.840 --> 00:02:25.949 align:start position:0%
huge ons and be able to participate in
the<00:02:23.000><c> consensus</c><00:02:23.599><c> in</c><00:02:23.760><c> the</c><00:02:24.680><c> protocol</c><00:02:25.680><c> and</c><00:02:25.800><c> the</c>

00:02:25.949 --> 00:02:25.959 align:start position:0%
the consensus in the protocol and the
 

00:02:25.959 --> 00:02:27.990 align:start position:0%
the consensus in the protocol and the
second<00:02:26.319><c> property</c><00:02:26.840><c> is</c><00:02:26.959><c> that</c><00:02:27.239><c> I</c><00:02:27.360><c> want</c><00:02:27.640><c> that</c><00:02:27.800><c> you</c>

00:02:27.990 --> 00:02:28.000 align:start position:0%
second property is that I want that you
 

00:02:28.000 --> 00:02:30.229 align:start position:0%
second property is that I want that you
be<00:02:28.200><c> able</c><00:02:28.400><c> to</c><00:02:28.599><c> defeat</c><00:02:29.000><c> anyone</c><00:02:29.440><c> by</c><00:02:29.560><c> yourself</c>

00:02:30.229 --> 00:02:30.239 align:start position:0%
be able to defeat anyone by yourself
 

00:02:30.239 --> 00:02:32.030 align:start position:0%
be able to defeat anyone by yourself
even<00:02:30.440><c> if</c><00:02:30.560><c> you're</c><00:02:30.760><c> facing</c><00:02:31.239><c> against</c><00:02:31.519><c> a</c><00:02:31.640><c> nation</c>

00:02:32.030 --> 00:02:32.040 align:start position:0%
even if you're facing against a nation
 

00:02:32.040 --> 00:02:35.390 align:start position:0%
even if you're facing against a nation
state<00:02:32.920><c> so</c><00:02:33.120><c> if</c><00:02:33.239><c> you</c><00:02:33.400><c> get</c><00:02:33.680><c> those</c><00:02:33.840><c> two</c><00:02:34.400><c> properties</c>

00:02:35.390 --> 00:02:35.400 align:start position:0%
state so if you get those two properties
 

00:02:35.400 --> 00:02:37.550 align:start position:0%
state so if you get those two properties
to<00:02:35.680><c> defend</c><00:02:36.040><c> an</c><00:02:36.200><c> optimistic</c><00:02:36.680><c> roll</c><00:02:36.959><c> up</c><00:02:37.319><c> all</c><00:02:37.440><c> you</c>

00:02:37.550 --> 00:02:37.560 align:start position:0%
to defend an optimistic roll up all you
 

00:02:37.560 --> 00:02:39.350 align:start position:0%
to defend an optimistic roll up all you
have<00:02:37.680><c> to</c><00:02:37.800><c> do</c><00:02:37.959><c> is</c><00:02:38.040><c> set</c><00:02:38.239><c> up</c><00:02:38.360><c> a</c><00:02:38.480><c> note</c><00:02:38.840><c> on</c><00:02:39.000><c> your</c><00:02:39.120><c> own</c>

00:02:39.350 --> 00:02:39.360 align:start position:0%
have to do is set up a note on your own
 

00:02:39.360 --> 00:02:40.630 align:start position:0%
have to do is set up a note on your own
infrastructure<00:02:40.120><c> you</c><00:02:40.200><c> don't</c><00:02:40.360><c> need</c><00:02:40.480><c> to</c>

00:02:40.630 --> 00:02:40.640 align:start position:0%
infrastructure you don't need to
 

00:02:40.640 --> 00:02:43.030 align:start position:0%
infrastructure you don't need to
delegate<00:02:41.080><c> trust</c><00:02:41.440><c> to</c><00:02:41.599><c> anybody</c><00:02:42.000><c> else</c><00:02:42.760><c> we</c>

00:02:43.030 --> 00:02:43.040 align:start position:0%
delegate trust to anybody else we
 

00:02:43.040 --> 00:02:46.229 align:start position:0%
delegate trust to anybody else we
inherit<00:02:43.720><c> the</c><00:02:43.920><c> security</c><00:02:44.480><c> of</c><00:02:44.599><c> the</c><00:02:44.760><c> base</c><00:02:45.239><c> layer</c>

00:02:46.229 --> 00:02:46.239 align:start position:0%
inherit the security of the base layer
 

00:02:46.239 --> 00:02:49.229 align:start position:0%
inherit the security of the base layer
uh<00:02:46.360><c> so</c><00:02:46.720><c> those</c><00:02:46.879><c> are</c><00:02:47.120><c> like</c><00:02:47.280><c> the</c><00:02:47.480><c> two</c><00:02:47.920><c> like</c><00:02:48.920><c> uh</c>

00:02:49.229 --> 00:02:49.239 align:start position:0%
uh so those are like the two like uh
 

00:02:49.239 --> 00:02:51.509 align:start position:0%
uh so those are like the two like uh
oneof<00:02:49.640><c> end</c><00:02:49.879><c> property</c><00:02:50.280><c> and</c><00:02:50.440><c> we</c><00:02:50.560><c> want</c><00:02:50.720><c> it</c><00:02:50.840><c> to</c><00:02:50.959><c> be</c>

00:02:51.509 --> 00:02:51.519 align:start position:0%
oneof end property and we want it to be
 

00:02:51.519 --> 00:02:53.470 align:start position:0%
oneof end property and we want it to be
decentralized<00:02:52.519><c> uh</c><00:02:52.640><c> and</c><00:02:52.800><c> the</c><00:02:52.959><c> next</c><00:02:53.159><c> one</c><00:02:53.360><c> is</c>

00:02:53.470 --> 00:02:53.480 align:start position:0%
decentralized uh and the next one is
 

00:02:53.480 --> 00:02:55.309 align:start position:0%
decentralized uh and the next one is
that<00:02:53.640><c> we</c><00:02:53.800><c> want</c><00:02:54.080><c> settlement</c><00:02:54.560><c> to</c><00:02:54.800><c> happen</c>

00:02:55.309 --> 00:02:55.319 align:start position:0%
that we want settlement to happen
 

00:02:55.319 --> 00:02:57.470 align:start position:0%
that we want settlement to happen
without<00:02:55.680><c> large</c><00:02:56.000><c> delays</c><00:02:56.440><c> we</c><00:02:56.560><c> want</c><00:02:57.080><c> settlement</c>

00:02:57.470 --> 00:02:57.480 align:start position:0%
without large delays we want settlement
 

00:02:57.480 --> 00:03:00.470 align:start position:0%
without large delays we want settlement
to<00:02:57.680><c> happen</c><00:02:58.040><c> quickly</c><00:02:59.040><c> so</c><00:02:59.280><c> let</c><00:02:59.440><c> me</c><00:02:59.560><c> run</c>

00:03:00.470 --> 00:03:00.480 align:start position:0%
to happen quickly so let me run
 

00:03:00.480 --> 00:03:02.270 align:start position:0%
to happen quickly so let me run
all<00:03:00.599><c> the</c><00:03:00.720><c> three</c><00:03:00.920><c> of</c><00:03:01.000><c> them</c><00:03:01.319><c> together</c><00:03:01.920><c> uh</c><00:03:02.080><c> they</c>

00:03:02.270 --> 00:03:02.280 align:start position:0%
all the three of them together uh they
 

00:03:02.280 --> 00:03:04.830 align:start position:0%
all the three of them together uh they
kind<00:03:02.440><c> of</c><00:03:02.599><c> look</c><00:03:02.920><c> like</c><00:03:03.239><c> this</c><00:03:03.959><c> you</c><00:03:04.120><c> know</c>

00:03:04.830 --> 00:03:04.840 align:start position:0%
kind of look like this you know
 

00:03:04.840 --> 00:03:06.589 align:start position:0%
kind of look like this you know
decentralization<00:03:05.840><c> I</c><00:03:05.920><c> want</c><00:03:06.080><c> you</c><00:03:06.200><c> to</c><00:03:06.319><c> be</c><00:03:06.400><c> able</c>

00:03:06.589 --> 00:03:06.599 align:start position:0%
decentralization I want you to be able
 

00:03:06.599 --> 00:03:08.990 align:start position:0%
decentralization I want you to be able
to<00:03:06.879><c> participate</c><00:03:07.879><c> without</c><00:03:08.200><c> a</c><00:03:08.280><c> supercomputer</c>

00:03:08.990 --> 00:03:09.000 align:start position:0%
to participate without a supercomputer
 

00:03:09.000 --> 00:03:11.390 align:start position:0%
to participate without a supercomputer
or<00:03:09.239><c> huge</c><00:03:09.560><c> bonds</c><00:03:10.560><c> there</c><00:03:10.640><c> is</c><00:03:10.799><c> security</c><00:03:11.280><c> which</c>

00:03:11.390 --> 00:03:11.400 align:start position:0%
or huge bonds there is security which
 

00:03:11.400 --> 00:03:13.430 align:start position:0%
or huge bonds there is security which
means<00:03:11.599><c> that</c><00:03:11.760><c> tvl</c><00:03:12.200><c> cannot</c><00:03:12.480><c> be</c><00:03:12.640><c> stolen</c><00:03:13.120><c> even</c><00:03:13.319><c> if</c>

00:03:13.430 --> 00:03:13.440 align:start position:0%
means that tvl cannot be stolen even if
 

00:03:13.440 --> 00:03:15.710 align:start position:0%
means that tvl cannot be stolen even if
you're<00:03:13.599><c> facing</c><00:03:13.920><c> against</c><00:03:14.159><c> this</c><00:03:14.360><c> nation</c><00:03:14.720><c> state</c>

00:03:15.710 --> 00:03:15.720 align:start position:0%
you're facing against this nation state
 

00:03:15.720 --> 00:03:18.630 align:start position:0%
you're facing against this nation state
uh<00:03:16.000><c> and</c><00:03:16.400><c> liess</c><00:03:17.159><c> no</c><00:03:17.319><c> large</c><00:03:17.599><c> delays</c><00:03:18.440><c> and</c><00:03:18.519><c> you</c>

00:03:18.630 --> 00:03:18.640 align:start position:0%
uh and liess no large delays and you
 

00:03:18.640 --> 00:03:20.229 align:start position:0%
uh and liess no large delays and you
might<00:03:18.840><c> be</c><00:03:19.000><c> getting</c><00:03:19.319><c> some</c><00:03:19.519><c> flashbacks</c><00:03:20.159><c> you</c>

00:03:20.229 --> 00:03:20.239 align:start position:0%
might be getting some flashbacks you
 

00:03:20.239 --> 00:03:22.149 align:start position:0%
might be getting some flashbacks you
know<00:03:20.440><c> like</c><00:03:20.560><c> some</c><00:03:20.720><c> PTSD</c><00:03:21.400><c> like</c><00:03:21.560><c> oh</c><00:03:21.720><c> no</c><00:03:21.920><c> do</c><00:03:22.040><c> we</c>

00:03:22.149 --> 00:03:22.159 align:start position:0%
know like some PTSD like oh no do we
 

00:03:22.159 --> 00:03:24.710 align:start position:0%
know like some PTSD like oh no do we
have<00:03:22.280><c> another</c><00:03:22.720><c> trma</c><00:03:23.720><c> and</c><00:03:24.040><c> yeah</c><00:03:24.239><c> kind</c><00:03:24.400><c> of</c><00:03:24.599><c> you</c>

00:03:24.710 --> 00:03:24.720 align:start position:0%
have another trma and yeah kind of you
 

00:03:24.720 --> 00:03:26.509 align:start position:0%
have another trma and yeah kind of you
know<00:03:24.879><c> it's</c><00:03:25.080><c> actually</c><00:03:25.599><c> quite</c><00:03:25.799><c> hard</c><00:03:26.040><c> to</c><00:03:26.200><c> get</c><00:03:26.360><c> the</c>

00:03:26.509 --> 00:03:26.519 align:start position:0%
know it's actually quite hard to get the
 

00:03:26.519 --> 00:03:29.149 align:start position:0%
know it's actually quite hard to get the
three<00:03:26.680><c> of</c><00:03:26.840><c> them</c><00:03:27.080><c> at</c><00:03:27.239><c> the</c><00:03:27.360><c> same</c><00:03:27.760><c> time</c><00:03:28.760><c> uh</c><00:03:29.000><c> and</c>

00:03:29.149 --> 00:03:29.159 align:start position:0%
three of them at the same time uh and
 

00:03:29.159 --> 00:03:31.750 align:start position:0%
three of them at the same time uh and
you<00:03:29.280><c> can</c><00:03:29.480><c> always</c><00:03:29.920><c> naively</c><00:03:30.840><c> go</c><00:03:31.200><c> from</c><00:03:31.480><c> one</c>

00:03:31.750 --> 00:03:31.760 align:start position:0%
you can always naively go from one
 

00:03:31.760 --> 00:03:35.390 align:start position:0%
you can always naively go from one
vertex<00:03:32.239><c> to</c><00:03:32.400><c> the</c><00:03:32.560><c> other</c><00:03:33.560><c> um</c><00:03:34.560><c> but</c><00:03:34.720><c> you</c><00:03:34.920><c> sacrifice</c>

00:03:35.390 --> 00:03:35.400 align:start position:0%
vertex to the other um but you sacrifice
 

00:03:35.400 --> 00:03:36.710 align:start position:0%
vertex to the other um but you sacrifice
one<00:03:35.519><c> to</c><00:03:35.680><c> gain</c><00:03:35.879><c> the</c><00:03:35.959><c> other</c><00:03:36.120><c> you</c><00:03:36.200><c> know</c><00:03:36.319><c> so</c><00:03:36.560><c> you</c>

00:03:36.710 --> 00:03:36.720 align:start position:0%
one to gain the other you know so you
 

00:03:36.720 --> 00:03:38.550 align:start position:0%
one to gain the other you know so you
can<00:03:36.920><c> take</c><00:03:37.080><c> this</c><00:03:37.239><c> straight</c><00:03:37.519><c> off</c><00:03:38.080><c> so</c><00:03:38.200><c> it</c><00:03:38.319><c> does</c>

00:03:38.550 --> 00:03:38.560 align:start position:0%
can take this straight off so it does
 

00:03:38.560 --> 00:03:40.350 align:start position:0%
can take this straight off so it does
look<00:03:38.760><c> like</c><00:03:38.920><c> a</c><00:03:39.120><c> a</c><00:03:39.280><c> real</c>

00:03:40.350 --> 00:03:40.360 align:start position:0%
look like a a real
 

00:03:40.360 --> 00:03:42.789 align:start position:0%
look like a a real
trma<00:03:41.360><c> and</c><00:03:41.439><c> the</c><00:03:41.599><c> reason</c><00:03:41.840><c> for</c><00:03:42.040><c> that</c><00:03:42.239><c> is</c><00:03:42.360><c> Cil</c>

00:03:42.789 --> 00:03:42.799 align:start position:0%
trma and the reason for that is Cil
 

00:03:42.799 --> 00:03:44.910 align:start position:0%
trma and the reason for that is Cil
attacks<00:03:43.560><c> uh</c><00:03:43.680><c> I</c><00:03:43.760><c> will</c><00:03:43.959><c> zoom</c><00:03:44.200><c> in</c><00:03:44.360><c> on</c><00:03:44.560><c> only</c><00:03:44.760><c> the</c>

00:03:44.910 --> 00:03:44.920 align:start position:0%
attacks uh I will zoom in on only the
 

00:03:44.920 --> 00:03:46.589 align:start position:0%
attacks uh I will zoom in on only the
first<00:03:45.120><c> one</c><00:03:45.319><c> which</c><00:03:45.439><c> is</c><00:03:45.599><c> resource</c><00:03:46.120><c> exhaustion</c>

00:03:46.589 --> 00:03:46.599 align:start position:0%
first one which is resource exhaustion
 

00:03:46.599 --> 00:03:48.869 align:start position:0%
first one which is resource exhaustion
attacks<00:03:47.319><c> it's</c><00:03:47.439><c> like</c><00:03:47.560><c> a</c><00:03:47.720><c> Spam</c><00:03:48.120><c> attack</c><00:03:48.720><c> where</c>

00:03:48.869 --> 00:03:48.879 align:start position:0%
attacks it's like a Spam attack where
 

00:03:48.879 --> 00:03:51.309 align:start position:0%
attacks it's like a Spam attack where
you<00:03:49.000><c> create</c><00:03:49.400><c> like</c><00:03:49.519><c> a</c><00:03:49.720><c> huge</c><00:03:50.000><c> number</c><00:03:50.239><c> of</c><00:03:50.360><c> sibbles</c>

00:03:51.309 --> 00:03:51.319 align:start position:0%
you create like a huge number of sibbles
 

00:03:51.319 --> 00:03:53.509 align:start position:0%
you create like a huge number of sibbles
and<00:03:51.400><c> you</c><00:03:51.599><c> just</c><00:03:51.799><c> drain</c><00:03:52.280><c> the</c><00:03:52.439><c> funds</c><00:03:52.879><c> of</c><00:03:53.040><c> the</c><00:03:53.200><c> Hest</c>

00:03:53.509 --> 00:03:53.519 align:start position:0%
and you just drain the funds of the Hest
 

00:03:53.519 --> 00:03:55.390 align:start position:0%
and you just drain the funds of the Hest
validator<00:03:54.239><c> until</c><00:03:54.519><c> they</c><00:03:54.640><c> can</c><00:03:54.840><c> no</c><00:03:55.000><c> longer</c>

00:03:55.390 --> 00:03:55.400 align:start position:0%
validator until they can no longer
 

00:03:55.400 --> 00:03:56.910 align:start position:0%
validator until they can no longer
participate<00:03:55.879><c> in</c><00:03:56.000><c> the</c><00:03:56.159><c> game</c><00:03:56.439><c> and</c><00:03:56.560><c> then</c><00:03:56.640><c> you</c><00:03:56.760><c> can</c>

00:03:56.910 --> 00:03:56.920 align:start position:0%
participate in the game and then you can
 

00:03:56.920 --> 00:03:59.990 align:start position:0%
participate in the game and then you can
steal<00:03:57.239><c> the</c><00:03:57.599><c> tvl</c><00:03:58.599><c> uh</c><00:03:58.720><c> so</c><00:03:58.879><c> this</c><00:03:59.000><c> is</c><00:03:59.079><c> a</c><00:03:59.200><c> Cil</c><00:03:59.519><c> attack</c>

00:03:59.990 --> 00:04:00.000 align:start position:0%
steal the tvl uh so this is a Cil attack
 

00:04:00.000 --> 00:04:01.589 align:start position:0%
steal the tvl uh so this is a Cil attack
that<00:04:00.159><c> targets</c><00:04:00.599><c> the</c><00:04:00.760><c> security</c><00:04:01.319><c> of</c><00:04:01.480><c> the</c>

00:04:01.589 --> 00:04:01.599 align:start position:0%
that targets the security of the
 

00:04:01.599 --> 00:04:04.910 align:start position:0%
that targets the security of the
algorithm<00:04:02.560><c> and</c><00:04:02.680><c> there</c><00:04:02.799><c> are</c><00:04:03.079><c> mitigation</c><00:04:04.079><c> um</c>

00:04:04.910 --> 00:04:04.920 align:start position:0%
algorithm and there are mitigation um
 

00:04:04.920 --> 00:04:07.350 align:start position:0%
algorithm and there are mitigation um
strategies<00:04:05.640><c> but</c><00:04:05.799><c> they</c><00:04:06.000><c> end</c><00:04:06.200><c> up</c><00:04:06.480><c> restricting</c>

00:04:07.350 --> 00:04:07.360 align:start position:0%
strategies but they end up restricting
 

00:04:07.360 --> 00:04:10.470 align:start position:0%
strategies but they end up restricting
participation<00:04:08.360><c> and</c><00:04:08.599><c> thus</c><00:04:08.959><c> harming</c>

00:04:10.470 --> 00:04:10.480 align:start position:0%
participation and thus harming
 

00:04:10.480 --> 00:04:12.270 align:start position:0%
participation and thus harming
decentralization<00:04:11.480><c> uh</c><00:04:11.560><c> so</c><00:04:11.720><c> there</c><00:04:11.840><c> are</c><00:04:12.000><c> three</c>

00:04:12.270 --> 00:04:12.280 align:start position:0%
decentralization uh so there are three
 

00:04:12.280 --> 00:04:14.309 align:start position:0%
decentralization uh so there are three
main<00:04:13.040><c> uh</c><00:04:13.159><c> solutions</c><00:04:13.599><c> that</c><00:04:13.799><c> we</c><00:04:13.920><c> will</c><00:04:14.120><c> talk</c>

00:04:14.309 --> 00:04:14.319 align:start position:0%
main uh solutions that we will talk
 

00:04:14.319 --> 00:04:16.189 align:start position:0%
main uh solutions that we will talk
today<00:04:14.799><c> there</c><00:04:14.920><c> are</c><00:04:15.079><c> several</c><00:04:15.400><c> others</c><00:04:15.840><c> but</c><00:04:16.000><c> we'll</c>

00:04:16.189 --> 00:04:16.199 align:start position:0%
today there are several others but we'll
 

00:04:16.199 --> 00:04:18.789 align:start position:0%
today there are several others but we'll
talk<00:04:16.400><c> about</c><00:04:16.680><c> these</c><00:04:16.880><c> two</c><00:04:17.799><c> the</c><00:04:17.959><c> first</c><00:04:18.199><c> two</c><00:04:18.440><c> is</c><00:04:18.600><c> by</c>

00:04:18.789 --> 00:04:18.799 align:start position:0%
talk about these two the first two is by
 

00:04:18.799 --> 00:04:21.229 align:start position:0%
talk about these two the first two is by
optimism<00:04:19.440><c> optimism</c><00:04:19.959><c> fault</c><00:04:20.359><c> proof</c><00:04:20.919><c> uh</c><00:04:21.000><c> there's</c>

00:04:21.229 --> 00:04:21.239 align:start position:0%
optimism optimism fault proof uh there's
 

00:04:21.239 --> 00:04:24.790 align:start position:0%
optimism optimism fault proof uh there's
also<00:04:21.479><c> arbitrum</c><00:04:22.520><c> bold</c><00:04:23.520><c> and</c><00:04:23.880><c> our</c><00:04:24.160><c> own</c>

00:04:24.790 --> 00:04:24.800 align:start position:0%
also arbitrum bold and our own
 

00:04:24.800 --> 00:04:27.150 align:start position:0%
also arbitrum bold and our own
permissionless<00:04:25.520><c> referee</c><00:04:26.000><c> tournaments</c><00:04:26.680><c> PRT</c>

00:04:27.150 --> 00:04:27.160 align:start position:0%
permissionless referee tournaments PRT
 

00:04:27.160 --> 00:04:29.029 align:start position:0%
permissionless referee tournaments PRT
for<00:04:27.400><c> short</c><00:04:27.800><c> this</c><00:04:27.919><c> is</c><00:04:28.040><c> the</c><00:04:28.199><c> previous</c><00:04:28.520><c> algorithm</c>

00:04:29.029 --> 00:04:29.039 align:start position:0%
for short this is the previous algorithm
 

00:04:29.039 --> 00:04:31.070 align:start position:0%
for short this is the previous algorithm
we<00:04:29.199><c> did</c><00:04:29.840><c> that</c><00:04:29.960><c> was</c><00:04:30.120><c> our</c><00:04:30.320><c> first</c><00:04:30.600><c> attempt</c><00:04:30.960><c> at</c>

00:04:31.070 --> 00:04:31.080 align:start position:0%
we did that was our first attempt at
 

00:04:31.080 --> 00:04:33.909 align:start position:0%
we did that was our first attempt at
cracking<00:04:31.880><c> this</c><00:04:32.880><c> uh</c><00:04:33.039><c> and</c><00:04:33.160><c> I</c><00:04:33.280><c> want</c><00:04:33.400><c> to</c><00:04:33.600><c> highlight</c>

00:04:33.909 --> 00:04:33.919 align:start position:0%
cracking this uh and I want to highlight
 

00:04:33.919 --> 00:04:36.870 align:start position:0%
cracking this uh and I want to highlight
the<00:04:34.080><c> very</c><00:04:34.240><c> important</c><00:04:34.680><c> fact</c><00:04:35.160><c> that</c><00:04:35.600><c> the</c><00:04:35.880><c> top</c><00:04:36.520><c> two</c>

00:04:36.870 --> 00:04:36.880 align:start position:0%
the very important fact that the top two
 

00:04:36.880 --> 00:04:39.670 align:start position:0%
the very important fact that the top two
you<00:04:36.960><c> know</c><00:04:37.120><c> the</c><00:04:37.240><c> first</c><00:04:37.720><c> two</c><00:04:38.720><c> uh</c><00:04:38.880><c> if</c><00:04:39.000><c> you</c><00:04:39.240><c> look</c><00:04:39.560><c> at</c>

00:04:39.670 --> 00:04:39.680 align:start position:0%
you know the first two uh if you look at
 

00:04:39.680 --> 00:04:42.749 align:start position:0%
you know the first two uh if you look at
the<00:04:39.880><c> tvl</c><00:04:40.479><c> Distribution</c><00:04:41.039><c> on</c><00:04:41.199><c> L2</c><00:04:41.600><c> beat</c><00:04:42.479><c> pretty</c>

00:04:42.749 --> 00:04:42.759 align:start position:0%
the tvl Distribution on L2 beat pretty
 

00:04:42.759 --> 00:04:45.469 align:start position:0%
the tvl Distribution on L2 beat pretty
much<00:04:43.080><c> most</c><00:04:43.320><c> of</c><00:04:43.520><c> it</c><00:04:44.120><c> is</c><00:04:44.280><c> being</c><00:04:44.600><c> protected</c><00:04:45.320><c> by</c>

00:04:45.469 --> 00:04:45.479 align:start position:0%
much most of it is being protected by
 

00:04:45.479 --> 00:04:47.189 align:start position:0%
much most of it is being protected by
those<00:04:45.759><c> first</c><00:04:46.039><c> two</c><00:04:46.240><c> you</c><00:04:46.360><c> know</c><00:04:46.520><c> it's</c><00:04:46.680><c> either</c><00:04:46.880><c> an</c>

00:04:47.189 --> 00:04:47.199 align:start position:0%
those first two you know it's either an
 

00:04:47.199 --> 00:04:50.189 align:start position:0%
those first two you know it's either an
OP<00:04:47.560><c> chain</c><00:04:47.960><c> or</c><00:04:48.160><c> an</c><00:04:48.320><c> arbitrum</c><00:04:48.800><c> chain</c><00:04:49.639><c> so</c><00:04:49.960><c> we</c><00:04:50.039><c> need</c>

00:04:50.189 --> 00:04:50.199 align:start position:0%
OP chain or an arbitrum chain so we need
 

00:04:50.199 --> 00:04:52.029 align:start position:0%
OP chain or an arbitrum chain so we need
to<00:04:50.360><c> keep</c><00:04:50.520><c> this</c><00:04:50.680><c> in</c><00:04:50.840><c> mind</c><00:04:51.360><c> because</c><00:04:51.600><c> we</c><00:04:51.680><c> need</c><00:04:51.840><c> to</c>

00:04:52.029 --> 00:04:52.039 align:start position:0%
to keep this in mind because we need to
 

00:04:52.039 --> 00:04:54.469 align:start position:0%
to keep this in mind because we need to
take<00:04:52.919><c> the</c><00:04:53.080><c> analysis</c><00:04:53.520><c> of</c><00:04:53.720><c> these</c><00:04:53.840><c> algorithms</c>

00:04:54.469 --> 00:04:54.479 align:start position:0%
take the analysis of these algorithms
 

00:04:54.479 --> 00:04:57.110 align:start position:0%
take the analysis of these algorithms
quite<00:04:55.120><c> seriously</c><00:04:56.120><c> uh</c><00:04:56.240><c> so</c><00:04:56.400><c> this</c><00:04:56.479><c> is</c><00:04:56.600><c> the</c><00:04:56.759><c> sneak</c>

00:04:57.110 --> 00:04:57.120 align:start position:0%
quite seriously uh so this is the sneak
 

00:04:57.120 --> 00:04:59.790 align:start position:0%
quite seriously uh so this is the sneak
peek<00:04:57.880><c> comparison</c><00:04:58.560><c> between</c><00:04:59.039><c> you</c><00:04:59.160><c> know</c><00:04:59.400><c> those</c>

00:04:59.790 --> 00:04:59.800 align:start position:0%
peek comparison between you know those
 

00:04:59.800 --> 00:05:01.469 align:start position:0%
peek comparison between you know those
three<00:05:00.240><c> and</c><00:05:00.400><c> the</c><00:05:00.520><c> one</c><00:05:00.680><c> we're</c><00:05:00.800><c> going</c><00:05:00.919><c> to</c><00:05:01.039><c> present</c>

00:05:01.469 --> 00:05:01.479 align:start position:0%
three and the one we're going to present
 

00:05:01.479 --> 00:05:04.390 align:start position:0%
three and the one we're going to present
today<00:05:02.479><c> and</c><00:05:02.680><c> the</c><00:05:02.840><c> columns</c><00:05:03.360><c> they</c><00:05:03.560><c> map</c><00:05:04.039><c> directly</c>

00:05:04.390 --> 00:05:04.400 align:start position:0%
today and the columns they map directly
 

00:05:04.400 --> 00:05:07.270 align:start position:0%
today and the columns they map directly
to<00:05:04.639><c> those</c><00:05:04.800><c> three</c><00:05:05.280><c> properties</c><00:05:06.280><c> so</c><00:05:06.680><c> for</c><00:05:06.880><c> example</c>

00:05:07.270 --> 00:05:07.280 align:start position:0%
to those three properties so for example
 

00:05:07.280 --> 00:05:10.710 align:start position:0%
to those three properties so for example
bonds<00:05:07.919><c> uh</c><00:05:08.039><c> if</c><00:05:08.120><c> you</c><00:05:08.280><c> look</c><00:05:08.440><c> at</c><00:05:08.600><c> bold</c><00:05:09.160><c> you</c><00:05:09.320><c> need</c>

00:05:10.710 --> 00:05:10.720 align:start position:0%
bonds uh if you look at bold you need
 

00:05:10.720 --> 00:05:13.909 align:start position:0%
bonds uh if you look at bold you need
3,600<00:05:11.720><c> eth</c><00:05:12.639><c> to</c><00:05:12.840><c> become</c><00:05:13.039><c> a</c><00:05:13.199><c> validator</c><00:05:13.720><c> so</c><00:05:13.840><c> it's</c>

00:05:13.909 --> 00:05:13.919 align:start position:0%
3,600 eth to become a validator so it's
 

00:05:13.919 --> 00:05:17.070 align:start position:0%
3,600 eth to become a validator so it's
a<00:05:14.080><c> very</c><00:05:14.280><c> high</c><00:05:14.520><c> Bond</c><00:05:15.199><c> uh</c><00:05:15.560><c> value</c><00:05:16.560><c> and</c><00:05:16.680><c> this</c><00:05:16.840><c> has</c><00:05:16.960><c> a</c>

00:05:17.070 --> 00:05:17.080 align:start position:0%
a very high Bond uh value and this has a
 

00:05:17.080 --> 00:05:19.309 align:start position:0%
a very high Bond uh value and this has a
centralization<00:05:17.880><c> effect</c><00:05:18.280><c> so</c><00:05:18.479><c> the</c><00:05:18.600><c> bond</c><00:05:18.880><c> colum</c>

00:05:19.309 --> 00:05:19.319 align:start position:0%
centralization effect so the bond colum
 

00:05:19.319 --> 00:05:21.749 align:start position:0%
centralization effect so the bond colum
is<00:05:19.440><c> related</c><00:05:19.759><c> to</c><00:05:20.440><c> centralization</c>

00:05:21.749 --> 00:05:21.759 align:start position:0%
is related to centralization
 

00:05:21.759 --> 00:05:24.350 align:start position:0%
is related to centralization
decentralization<00:05:22.759><c> now</c><00:05:23.080><c> expenses</c><00:05:23.800><c> oh</c><00:05:24.000><c> just</c><00:05:24.120><c> to</c>

00:05:24.350 --> 00:05:24.360 align:start position:0%
decentralization now expenses oh just to
 

00:05:24.360 --> 00:05:26.270 align:start position:0%
decentralization now expenses oh just to
you<00:05:24.479><c> know</c><00:05:24.680><c> highlight</c><00:05:25.120><c> this</c><00:05:25.440><c> uh</c><00:05:25.639><c> this</c><00:05:25.720><c> is</c><00:05:25.840><c> a</c><00:05:26.039><c> 1</c>

00:05:26.270 --> 00:05:26.280 align:start position:0%
you know highlight this uh this is a 1
 

00:05:26.280 --> 00:05:28.749 align:start position:0%
you know highlight this uh this is a 1
million<00:05:26.680><c> ether</c><00:05:27.080><c> attack</c><00:05:27.600><c> scenario</c><00:05:28.440><c> so</c><00:05:28.600><c> we</c>

00:05:28.749 --> 00:05:28.759 align:start position:0%
million ether attack scenario so we
 

00:05:28.759 --> 00:05:30.590 align:start position:0%
million ether attack scenario so we
assume<00:05:29.160><c> that</c><00:05:29.280><c> the</c><00:05:29.680><c> adversary</c><00:05:30.080><c> is</c><00:05:30.199><c> willing</c><00:05:30.440><c> to</c>

00:05:30.590 --> 00:05:30.600 align:start position:0%
assume that the adversary is willing to
 

00:05:30.600 --> 00:05:33.309 align:start position:0%
assume that the adversary is willing to
burn<00:05:30.960><c> that</c><00:05:31.120><c> amount</c><00:05:31.360><c> of</c><00:05:31.520><c> money</c><00:05:32.520><c> uh</c><00:05:32.919><c> in</c><00:05:33.080><c> that</c>

00:05:33.309 --> 00:05:33.319 align:start position:0%
burn that amount of money uh in that
 

00:05:33.319 --> 00:05:38.350 align:start position:0%
burn that amount of money uh in that
case<00:05:34.280><c> uh</c><00:05:35.080><c> if</c><00:05:35.280><c> it's</c><00:05:35.479><c> a</c><00:05:35.800><c> op</c><00:05:36.720><c> uh</c><00:05:36.800><c> fault</c><00:05:37.199><c> proof</c><00:05:38.160><c> the</c>

00:05:38.350 --> 00:05:38.360 align:start position:0%
case uh if it's a op uh fault proof the
 

00:05:38.360 --> 00:05:41.070 align:start position:0%
case uh if it's a op uh fault proof the
defender<00:05:38.919><c> has</c><00:05:39.080><c> to</c><00:05:39.280><c> match</c><00:05:39.720><c> those</c><00:05:39.960><c> funds</c><00:05:40.639><c> so</c><00:05:40.960><c> if</c>

00:05:41.070 --> 00:05:41.080 align:start position:0%
defender has to match those funds so if
 

00:05:41.080 --> 00:05:43.350 align:start position:0%
defender has to match those funds so if
you<00:05:41.199><c> don't</c><00:05:41.479><c> have</c><00:05:41.680><c> also</c><00:05:42.039><c> 1</c><00:05:42.199><c> million</c><00:05:42.520><c> ether</c><00:05:43.240><c> you</c>

00:05:43.350 --> 00:05:43.360 align:start position:0%
you don't have also 1 million ether you
 

00:05:43.360 --> 00:05:45.350 align:start position:0%
you don't have also 1 million ether you
will<00:05:43.560><c> lose</c><00:05:43.800><c> the</c><00:05:43.960><c> tvl</c><00:05:44.560><c> so</c><00:05:44.759><c> that</c><00:05:44.960><c> colume</c>

00:05:45.350 --> 00:05:45.360 align:start position:0%
will lose the tvl so that colume
 

00:05:45.360 --> 00:05:48.110 align:start position:0%
will lose the tvl so that colume
expenses<00:05:45.919><c> maps</c><00:05:46.280><c> to</c><00:05:46.520><c> security</c><00:05:47.479><c> and</c><00:05:47.600><c> finally</c><00:05:47.960><c> we</c>

00:05:48.110 --> 00:05:48.120 align:start position:0%
expenses maps to security and finally we
 

00:05:48.120 --> 00:05:50.670 align:start position:0%
expenses maps to security and finally we
have<00:05:48.280><c> delay</c><00:05:49.000><c> uh</c><00:05:49.120><c> if</c><00:05:49.199><c> you</c><00:05:49.319><c> look</c><00:05:49.479><c> at</c><00:05:49.600><c> our</c><00:05:49.759><c> own</c><00:05:50.560><c> if</c>

00:05:50.670 --> 00:05:50.680 align:start position:0%
have delay uh if you look at our own if
 

00:05:50.680 --> 00:05:52.150 align:start position:0%
have delay uh if you look at our own if
there's<00:05:50.960><c> this</c><00:05:51.120><c> 1</c><00:05:51.319><c> million</c><00:05:51.600><c> ether</c><00:05:51.919><c> attack</c>

00:05:52.150 --> 00:05:52.160 align:start position:0%
there's this 1 million ether attack
 

00:05:52.160 --> 00:05:53.830 align:start position:0%
there's this 1 million ether attack
civil<00:05:52.520><c> attack</c>

00:05:53.830 --> 00:05:53.840 align:start position:0%
civil attack
 

00:05:53.840 --> 00:05:56.670 align:start position:0%
civil attack
um<00:05:54.840><c> you</c><00:05:55.039><c> get</c><00:05:55.240><c> 20</c><00:05:55.520><c> weeks</c><00:05:55.759><c> delay</c><00:05:56.120><c> which</c><00:05:56.240><c> is</c><00:05:56.400><c> also</c>

00:05:56.670 --> 00:05:56.680 align:start position:0%
um you get 20 weeks delay which is also
 

00:05:56.680 --> 00:05:58.590 align:start position:0%
um you get 20 weeks delay which is also
quite<00:05:56.919><c> high</c><00:05:57.199><c> so</c><00:05:57.360><c> you</c><00:05:57.479><c> know</c><00:05:57.880><c> none</c><00:05:58.080><c> of</c><00:05:58.199><c> the</c><00:05:58.360><c> three</c>

00:05:58.590 --> 00:05:58.600 align:start position:0%
quite high so you know none of the three
 

00:05:58.600 --> 00:06:00.230 align:start position:0%
quite high so you know none of the three
we<00:05:58.720><c> feel</c><00:05:58.919><c> are</c><00:05:59.080><c> quite</c><00:05:59.280><c> adequate</c>

00:06:00.230 --> 00:06:00.240 align:start position:0%
we feel are quite adequate
 

00:06:00.240 --> 00:06:01.710 align:start position:0%
we feel are quite adequate
and<00:06:00.360><c> today</c><00:06:00.600><c> we</c><00:06:00.680><c> will</c><00:06:00.880><c> present</c><00:06:01.240><c> Dave</c><00:06:01.520><c> which</c><00:06:01.600><c> is</c>

00:06:01.710 --> 00:06:01.720 align:start position:0%
and today we will present Dave which is
 

00:06:01.720 --> 00:06:03.990 align:start position:0%
and today we will present Dave which is
on<00:06:01.880><c> the</c><00:06:02.039><c> bottom</c><00:06:02.880><c> which</c><00:06:03.199><c> strikes</c><00:06:03.639><c> a</c><00:06:03.800><c> good</c>

00:06:03.990 --> 00:06:04.000 align:start position:0%
on the bottom which strikes a good
 

00:06:04.000 --> 00:06:06.150 align:start position:0%
on the bottom which strikes a good
balance<00:06:04.360><c> across</c><00:06:04.840><c> all</c><00:06:05.160><c> three</c><00:06:05.440><c> of</c>

00:06:06.150 --> 00:06:06.160 align:start position:0%
balance across all three of
 

00:06:06.160 --> 00:06:10.230 align:start position:0%
balance across all three of
them<00:06:07.280><c> cool</c><00:06:08.280><c> so</c><00:06:08.639><c> let's</c><00:06:09.000><c> talk</c><00:06:09.360><c> about</c><00:06:09.639><c> some</c><00:06:09.880><c> basic</c>

00:06:10.230 --> 00:06:10.240 align:start position:0%
them cool so let's talk about some basic
 

00:06:10.240 --> 00:06:12.870 align:start position:0%
them cool so let's talk about some basic
concepts<00:06:10.720><c> of</c><00:06:11.240><c> fraud</c>

00:06:12.870 --> 00:06:12.880 align:start position:0%
concepts of fraud
 

00:06:12.880 --> 00:06:16.390 align:start position:0%
concepts of fraud
proofs<00:06:13.880><c> uh</c><00:06:14.360><c> okay</c><00:06:14.599><c> so</c><00:06:14.840><c> first</c><00:06:15.080><c> our</c><00:06:15.280><c> threat</c><00:06:15.639><c> model</c>

00:06:16.390 --> 00:06:16.400 align:start position:0%
proofs uh okay so first our threat model
 

00:06:16.400 --> 00:06:19.029 align:start position:0%
proofs uh okay so first our threat model
uh<00:06:16.520><c> we</c><00:06:16.680><c> assume</c><00:06:17.080><c> that</c><00:06:17.199><c> the</c><00:06:17.319><c> layer</c><00:06:17.639><c> one</c><00:06:18.039><c> works</c>

00:06:19.029 --> 00:06:19.039 align:start position:0%
uh we assume that the layer one works
 

00:06:19.039 --> 00:06:20.830 align:start position:0%
uh we assume that the layer one works
however<00:06:19.440><c> we</c><00:06:19.599><c> also</c><00:06:19.880><c> assume</c><00:06:20.240><c> that</c><00:06:20.360><c> it</c><00:06:20.520><c> can</c><00:06:20.680><c> be</c>

00:06:20.830 --> 00:06:20.840 align:start position:0%
however we also assume that it can be
 

00:06:20.840 --> 00:06:23.629 align:start position:0%
however we also assume that it can be
censored<00:06:21.360><c> for</c><00:06:21.720><c> up</c><00:06:21.919><c> to</c><00:06:22.120><c> one</c><00:06:22.400><c> week</c><00:06:23.160><c> so</c><00:06:23.400><c> think</c>

00:06:23.629 --> 00:06:23.639 align:start position:0%
censored for up to one week so think
 

00:06:23.639 --> 00:06:25.710 align:start position:0%
censored for up to one week so think
like<00:06:23.880><c> a</c><00:06:24.280><c> censorship</c><00:06:24.919><c> budget</c><00:06:25.440><c> that</c><00:06:25.560><c> the</c>

00:06:25.710 --> 00:06:25.720 align:start position:0%
like a censorship budget that the
 

00:06:25.720 --> 00:06:28.430 align:start position:0%
like a censorship budget that the
adversary<00:06:26.319><c> has</c><00:06:26.960><c> and</c><00:06:27.120><c> they</c><00:06:27.240><c> can</c><00:06:27.520><c> spend</c><00:06:27.880><c> it</c><00:06:28.160><c> at</c>

00:06:28.430 --> 00:06:28.440 align:start position:0%
adversary has and they can spend it at
 

00:06:28.440 --> 00:06:31.189 align:start position:0%
adversary has and they can spend it at
will<00:06:29.400><c> and</c><00:06:29.639><c> we</c><00:06:29.759><c> also</c><00:06:29.960><c> assume</c><00:06:30.280><c> there</c><00:06:30.400><c> is</c><00:06:30.560><c> one</c><00:06:30.759><c> ons</c>

00:06:31.189 --> 00:06:31.199 align:start position:0%
will and we also assume there is one ons
 

00:06:31.199 --> 00:06:33.110 align:start position:0%
will and we also assume there is one ons
validator<00:06:32.039><c> which</c><00:06:32.440><c> we're</c><00:06:32.599><c> going</c><00:06:32.720><c> to</c><00:06:32.840><c> say</c><00:06:32.960><c> it's</c>

00:06:33.110 --> 00:06:33.120 align:start position:0%
validator which we're going to say it's
 

00:06:33.120 --> 00:06:36.070 align:start position:0%
validator which we're going to say it's
Willie<00:06:34.120><c> And</c><00:06:34.280><c> Willie</c><00:06:34.639><c> has</c><00:06:34.759><c> a</c><00:06:34.960><c> laptop</c><00:06:35.759><c> a</c><00:06:35.840><c> few</c>

00:06:36.070 --> 00:06:36.080 align:start position:0%
Willie And Willie has a laptop a few
 

00:06:36.080 --> 00:06:39.550 align:start position:0%
Willie And Willie has a laptop a few
ether<00:06:36.560><c> and</c><00:06:36.960><c> values</c><00:06:37.960><c> uh</c><00:06:38.120><c> hard</c>

00:06:39.550 --> 00:06:39.560 align:start position:0%
ether and values uh hard
 

00:06:39.560 --> 00:06:42.350 align:start position:0%
ether and values uh hard
values<00:06:40.560><c> so</c><00:06:40.720><c> we</c><00:06:40.880><c> begin</c><00:06:41.240><c> with</c><00:06:41.400><c> the</c><00:06:41.599><c> basic</c>

00:06:42.350 --> 00:06:42.360 align:start position:0%
values so we begin with the basic
 

00:06:42.360 --> 00:06:45.230 align:start position:0%
values so we begin with the basic
primitive<00:06:42.919><c> which</c><00:06:43.039><c> is</c><00:06:43.160><c> a</c><00:06:43.400><c> pairwise</c><00:06:44.240><c> reputation</c>

00:06:45.230 --> 00:06:45.240 align:start position:0%
primitive which is a pairwise reputation
 

00:06:45.240 --> 00:06:47.670 align:start position:0%
primitive which is a pairwise reputation
so<00:06:45.479><c> the</c><00:06:45.639><c> goal</c><00:06:45.960><c> is</c><00:06:46.120><c> that</c><00:06:46.440><c> well</c><00:06:46.599><c> you</c><00:06:46.800><c> have</c><00:06:47.360><c> uh</c><00:06:47.479><c> two</c>

00:06:47.670 --> 00:06:47.680 align:start position:0%
so the goal is that well you have uh two
 

00:06:47.680 --> 00:06:50.029 align:start position:0%
so the goal is that well you have uh two
players<00:06:48.039><c> we</c><00:06:48.160><c> have</c><00:06:48.520><c> Willie</c><00:06:49.400><c> the</c>

00:06:50.029 --> 00:06:50.039 align:start position:0%
players we have Willie the
 

00:06:50.039 --> 00:06:52.510 align:start position:0%
players we have Willie the
adversary<00:06:51.039><c> and</c><00:06:51.360><c> the</c><00:06:51.479><c> blockchain</c><00:06:52.000><c> acting</c><00:06:52.280><c> as</c><00:06:52.360><c> a</c>

00:06:52.510 --> 00:06:52.520 align:start position:0%
adversary and the blockchain acting as a
 

00:06:52.520 --> 00:06:54.629 align:start position:0%
adversary and the blockchain acting as a
referee<00:06:52.880><c> in</c><00:06:52.960><c> the</c><00:06:53.080><c> middle</c><00:06:53.840><c> and</c><00:06:54.039><c> those</c><00:06:54.240><c> two</c><00:06:54.479><c> will</c>

00:06:54.629 --> 00:06:54.639 align:start position:0%
referee in the middle and those two will
 

00:06:54.639 --> 00:06:56.670 align:start position:0%
referee in the middle and those two will
engage<00:06:54.919><c> in</c><00:06:55.039><c> a</c><00:06:55.199><c> dispute</c><00:06:55.919><c> to</c><00:06:56.160><c> prove</c><00:06:56.440><c> that</c><00:06:56.560><c> the</c>

00:06:56.670 --> 00:06:56.680 align:start position:0%
engage in a dispute to prove that the
 

00:06:56.680 --> 00:06:59.670 align:start position:0%
engage in a dispute to prove that the
other<00:06:57.000><c> is</c><00:06:57.560><c> wrong</c><00:06:58.560><c> uh</c><00:06:58.759><c> and</c><00:06:58.879><c> they</c><00:06:59.039><c> want</c><00:06:59.199><c> to</c><00:06:59.599><c> in</c>

00:06:59.670 --> 00:06:59.680 align:start position:0%
other is wrong uh and they want to in
 

00:06:59.680 --> 00:07:01.309 align:start position:0%
other is wrong uh and they want to in
the<00:06:59.759><c> end</c><00:07:00.039><c> the</c><00:07:00.240><c> the</c><00:07:00.360><c> goal</c><00:07:00.560><c> is</c><00:07:00.680><c> to</c><00:07:00.840><c> prove</c><00:07:01.120><c> the</c>

00:07:01.309 --> 00:07:01.319 align:start position:0%
the end the the goal is to prove the
 

00:07:01.319 --> 00:07:03.950 align:start position:0%
the end the the goal is to prove the
result<00:07:01.680><c> of</c><00:07:01.800><c> a</c><00:07:02.039><c> program</c><00:07:02.639><c> to</c><00:07:02.840><c> the</c><00:07:03.039><c> referee</c><00:07:03.879><c> and</c>

00:07:03.950 --> 00:07:03.960 align:start position:0%
result of a program to the referee and
 

00:07:03.960 --> 00:07:04.990 align:start position:0%
result of a program to the referee and
it's<00:07:04.120><c> interesting</c><00:07:04.520><c> because</c><00:07:04.680><c> they</c><00:07:04.840><c> don't</c>

00:07:04.990 --> 00:07:05.000 align:start position:0%
it's interesting because they don't
 

00:07:05.000 --> 00:07:07.029 align:start position:0%
it's interesting because they don't
prove<00:07:05.199><c> the</c><00:07:05.319><c> correct</c><00:07:05.680><c> result</c><00:07:06.039><c> directly</c><00:07:06.879><c> they</c>

00:07:07.029 --> 00:07:07.039 align:start position:0%
prove the correct result directly they
 

00:07:07.039 --> 00:07:09.070 align:start position:0%
prove the correct result directly they
prove<00:07:07.280><c> that</c><00:07:07.400><c> the</c><00:07:07.560><c> other</c><00:07:07.919><c> is</c><00:07:08.160><c> incorrect</c><00:07:08.919><c> and</c>

00:07:09.070 --> 00:07:09.080 align:start position:0%
prove that the other is incorrect and
 

00:07:09.080 --> 00:07:10.790 align:start position:0%
prove that the other is incorrect and
since<00:07:09.280><c> we</c><00:07:09.440><c> assume</c><00:07:09.759><c> will</c><00:07:10.080><c> is</c><00:07:10.240><c> there</c><00:07:10.440><c> he's</c><00:07:10.680><c> the</c>

00:07:10.790 --> 00:07:10.800 align:start position:0%
since we assume will is there he's the
 

00:07:10.800 --> 00:07:12.150 align:start position:0%
since we assume will is there he's the
one<00:07:10.960><c> who's</c><00:07:11.160><c> going</c><00:07:11.319><c> to</c><00:07:11.440><c> enforce</c><00:07:11.759><c> the</c><00:07:11.919><c> right</c>

00:07:12.150 --> 00:07:12.160 align:start position:0%
one who's going to enforce the right
 

00:07:12.160 --> 00:07:14.070 align:start position:0%
one who's going to enforce the right
result<00:07:12.919><c> because</c><00:07:13.120><c> he's</c><00:07:13.319><c> the</c><00:07:13.400><c> honest</c><00:07:13.759><c> one</c><00:07:13.960><c> you</c>

00:07:14.070 --> 00:07:14.080 align:start position:0%
result because he's the honest one you
 

00:07:14.080 --> 00:07:16.749 align:start position:0%
result because he's the honest one you
know<00:07:14.800><c> uh</c><00:07:15.800><c> yeah</c><00:07:15.960><c> so</c><00:07:16.120><c> they're</c><00:07:16.240><c> going</c><00:07:16.360><c> to</c><00:07:16.479><c> fight</c>

00:07:16.749 --> 00:07:16.759 align:start position:0%
know uh yeah so they're going to fight
 

00:07:16.759 --> 00:07:19.150 align:start position:0%
know uh yeah so they're going to fight
to<00:07:16.879><c> prove</c><00:07:17.160><c> the</c><00:07:17.319><c> correct</c><00:07:17.680><c> result</c><00:07:18.160><c> of</c><00:07:18.319><c> a</c><00:07:18.560><c> program</c>

00:07:19.150 --> 00:07:19.160 align:start position:0%
to prove the correct result of a program
 

00:07:19.160 --> 00:07:20.749 align:start position:0%
to prove the correct result of a program
now<00:07:19.400><c> what</c><00:07:19.520><c> do</c><00:07:19.599><c> we</c><00:07:19.720><c> mean</c><00:07:19.960><c> by</c>

00:07:20.749 --> 00:07:20.759 align:start position:0%
now what do we mean by
 

00:07:20.759 --> 00:07:23.589 align:start position:0%
now what do we mean by
program<00:07:21.759><c> the</c><00:07:21.919><c> computation</c><00:07:22.479><c> model</c><00:07:23.160><c> has</c><00:07:23.400><c> an</c>

00:07:23.589 --> 00:07:23.599 align:start position:0%
program the computation model has an
 

00:07:23.599 --> 00:07:25.749 align:start position:0%
program the computation model has an
initial<00:07:24.000><c> State</c><00:07:24.720><c> and</c><00:07:24.879><c> a</c><00:07:25.039><c> state</c><00:07:25.280><c> transition</c>

00:07:25.749 --> 00:07:25.759 align:start position:0%
initial State and a state transition
 

00:07:25.759 --> 00:07:28.469 align:start position:0%
initial State and a state transition
function<00:07:26.280><c> agreed</c><00:07:26.680><c> by</c><00:07:26.960><c> everyone</c><00:07:27.960><c> and</c><00:07:28.120><c> then</c><00:07:28.280><c> we</c>

00:07:28.469 --> 00:07:28.479 align:start position:0%
function agreed by everyone and then we
 

00:07:28.479 --> 00:07:30.469 align:start position:0%
function agreed by everyone and then we
apply<00:07:28.879><c> the</c><00:07:29.000><c> state</c><00:07:29.160><c> transition</c><00:07:29.759><c> function</c><00:07:30.280><c> over</c>

00:07:30.469 --> 00:07:30.479 align:start position:0%
apply the state transition function over
 

00:07:30.479 --> 00:07:32.749 align:start position:0%
apply the state transition function over
and<00:07:30.680><c> over</c><00:07:30.960><c> the</c><00:07:31.080><c> initial</c><00:07:31.479><c> State</c><00:07:32.039><c> until</c><00:07:32.360><c> we</c><00:07:32.520><c> get</c>

00:07:32.749 --> 00:07:32.759 align:start position:0%
and over the initial State until we get
 

00:07:32.759 --> 00:07:35.070 align:start position:0%
and over the initial State until we get
the<00:07:32.919><c> final</c><00:07:33.240><c> State</c><00:07:33.759><c> and</c><00:07:33.960><c> that</c><00:07:34.120><c> final</c><00:07:34.479><c> state</c><00:07:34.919><c> is</c>

00:07:35.070 --> 00:07:35.080 align:start position:0%
the final State and that final state is
 

00:07:35.080 --> 00:07:38.150 align:start position:0%
the final State and that final state is
the<00:07:35.280><c> result</c><00:07:35.720><c> of</c><00:07:35.919><c> the</c><00:07:36.120><c> program</c><00:07:37.039><c> that's</c><00:07:37.319><c> what</c><00:07:37.960><c> we</c>

00:07:38.150 --> 00:07:38.160 align:start position:0%
the result of the program that's what we
 

00:07:38.160 --> 00:07:40.430 align:start position:0%
the result of the program that's what we
are<00:07:38.400><c> trying</c><00:07:38.680><c> to</c><00:07:38.840><c> prove</c><00:07:39.080><c> to</c><00:07:39.240><c> the</c><00:07:39.440><c> blockchain</c>

00:07:40.430 --> 00:07:40.440 align:start position:0%
are trying to prove to the blockchain
 

00:07:40.440 --> 00:07:42.469 align:start position:0%
are trying to prove to the blockchain
and<00:07:40.599><c> the</c><00:07:40.720><c> intuition</c><00:07:41.400><c> of</c><00:07:41.520><c> a</c><00:07:41.680><c> reputation</c><00:07:42.240><c> game</c>

00:07:42.469 --> 00:07:42.479 align:start position:0%
and the intuition of a reputation game
 

00:07:42.479 --> 00:07:44.749 align:start position:0%
and the intuition of a reputation game
is<00:07:42.599><c> that</c><00:07:42.840><c> first</c><00:07:43.080><c> we're</c><00:07:43.280><c> going</c><00:07:43.440><c> to</c><00:07:43.599><c> perform</c><00:07:44.560><c> a</c>

00:07:44.749 --> 00:07:44.759 align:start position:0%
is that first we're going to perform a
 

00:07:44.759 --> 00:07:47.589 align:start position:0%
is that first we're going to perform a
binary<00:07:45.280><c> search</c><00:07:46.280><c> on</c><00:07:46.599><c> this</c><00:07:46.840><c> computation</c><00:07:47.479><c> and</c>

00:07:47.589 --> 00:07:47.599 align:start position:0%
binary search on this computation and
 

00:07:47.599 --> 00:07:50.309 align:start position:0%
binary search on this computation and
try<00:07:47.840><c> to</c><00:07:48.120><c> pinpoint</c><00:07:49.039><c> the</c><00:07:49.280><c> exact</c><00:07:49.840><c> State</c>

00:07:50.309 --> 00:07:50.319 align:start position:0%
try to pinpoint the exact State
 

00:07:50.319 --> 00:07:53.070 align:start position:0%
try to pinpoint the exact State
transition<00:07:50.960><c> that</c><00:07:51.120><c> they</c><00:07:51.400><c> first</c><00:07:51.840><c> disagreed</c><00:07:52.400><c> on</c>

00:07:53.070 --> 00:07:53.080 align:start position:0%
transition that they first disagreed on
 

00:07:53.080 --> 00:07:54.430 align:start position:0%
transition that they first disagreed on
because<00:07:53.360><c> if</c><00:07:53.560><c> they</c><00:07:53.680><c> agree</c><00:07:54.000><c> before</c><00:07:54.280><c> and</c>

00:07:54.430 --> 00:07:54.440 align:start position:0%
because if they agree before and
 

00:07:54.440 --> 00:07:56.670 align:start position:0%
because if they agree before and
disagree<00:07:54.879><c> after</c><00:07:55.599><c> somewhere</c><00:07:55.960><c> in</c><00:07:56.080><c> the</c><00:07:56.199><c> middle</c>

00:07:56.670 --> 00:07:56.680 align:start position:0%
disagree after somewhere in the middle
 

00:07:56.680 --> 00:07:59.629 align:start position:0%
disagree after somewhere in the middle
they<00:07:57.000><c> start</c><00:07:57.759><c> started</c><00:07:58.319><c> disagreeing</c><00:07:59.240><c> and</c><00:07:59.520><c> we</c>

00:07:59.629 --> 00:07:59.639 align:start position:0%
they start started disagreeing and we
 

00:07:59.639 --> 00:08:02.189 align:start position:0%
they start started disagreeing and we
want<00:07:59.759><c> to</c><00:07:59.960><c> pinpoint</c><00:08:00.479><c> exactly</c><00:08:00.960><c> that</c><00:08:01.479><c> and</c><00:08:01.680><c> once</c>

00:08:02.189 --> 00:08:02.199 align:start position:0%
want to pinpoint exactly that and once
 

00:08:02.199 --> 00:08:05.029 align:start position:0%
want to pinpoint exactly that and once
you<00:08:02.400><c> find</c><00:08:02.720><c> that</c><00:08:03.120><c> Divergence</c><00:08:04.120><c> you</c><00:08:04.240><c> can</c><00:08:04.560><c> execute</c>

00:08:05.029 --> 00:08:05.039 align:start position:0%
you find that Divergence you can execute
 

00:08:05.039 --> 00:08:07.110 align:start position:0%
you find that Divergence you can execute
a<00:08:05.240><c> single</c><00:08:05.840><c> state</c><00:08:06.199><c> transition</c><00:08:06.680><c> function</c><00:08:07.000><c> you</c>

00:08:07.110 --> 00:08:07.120 align:start position:0%
a single state transition function you
 

00:08:07.120 --> 00:08:08.909 align:start position:0%
a single state transition function you
know<00:08:07.240><c> the</c><00:08:07.360><c> refere</c><00:08:07.800><c> the</c><00:08:07.919><c> blockchain</c><00:08:08.759><c> and</c>

00:08:08.909 --> 00:08:08.919 align:start position:0%
know the refere the blockchain and
 

00:08:08.919 --> 00:08:10.550 align:start position:0%
know the refere the blockchain and
figure<00:08:09.159><c> out</c><00:08:09.360><c> who's</c><00:08:09.560><c> lying</c><00:08:09.879><c> and</c><00:08:10.039><c> eliminate</c>

00:08:10.550 --> 00:08:10.560 align:start position:0%
figure out who's lying and eliminate
 

00:08:10.560 --> 00:08:13.029 align:start position:0%
figure out who's lying and eliminate
this<00:08:11.000><c> liar</c><00:08:12.000><c> uh</c><00:08:12.120><c> so</c><00:08:12.319><c> this</c><00:08:12.440><c> is</c><00:08:12.560><c> the</c><00:08:12.720><c> basic</c>

00:08:13.029 --> 00:08:13.039 align:start position:0%
this liar uh so this is the basic
 

00:08:13.039 --> 00:08:14.950 align:start position:0%
this liar uh so this is the basic
intuition<00:08:13.680><c> but</c><00:08:13.960><c> we're</c><00:08:14.159><c> going</c><00:08:14.360><c> to</c><00:08:14.599><c> make</c><00:08:14.759><c> a</c>

00:08:14.950 --> 00:08:14.960 align:start position:0%
intuition but we're going to make a
 

00:08:14.960 --> 00:08:17.670 align:start position:0%
intuition but we're going to make a
slight<00:08:15.240><c> change</c><00:08:15.560><c> to</c><00:08:15.879><c> this</c><00:08:16.879><c> uh</c><00:08:17.000><c> so</c><00:08:17.240><c> instead</c><00:08:17.479><c> of</c>

00:08:17.670 --> 00:08:17.680 align:start position:0%
slight change to this uh so instead of
 

00:08:17.680 --> 00:08:19.550 align:start position:0%
slight change to this uh so instead of
committing<00:08:18.120><c> just</c><00:08:18.280><c> to</c><00:08:18.400><c> the</c><00:08:18.520><c> final</c><00:08:18.840><c> state</c><00:08:19.280><c> which</c>

00:08:19.550 --> 00:08:19.560 align:start position:0%
committing just to the final state which
 

00:08:19.560 --> 00:08:21.749 align:start position:0%
committing just to the final state which
is<00:08:19.800><c> really</c><00:08:20.039><c> what</c><00:08:20.159><c> we're</c><00:08:20.360><c> interested</c><00:08:20.800><c> about</c><00:08:21.599><c> we</c>

00:08:21.749 --> 00:08:21.759 align:start position:0%
is really what we're interested about we
 

00:08:21.759 --> 00:08:24.869 align:start position:0%
is really what we're interested about we
are<00:08:22.039><c> going</c><00:08:22.879><c> instead</c><00:08:23.879><c> to</c><00:08:24.080><c> make</c><00:08:24.199><c> a</c><00:08:24.360><c> commitment</c>

00:08:24.869 --> 00:08:24.879 align:start position:0%
are going instead to make a commitment
 

00:08:24.879 --> 00:08:26.950 align:start position:0%
are going instead to make a commitment
on<00:08:25.120><c> the</c><00:08:25.319><c> whole</c><00:08:25.639><c> history</c><00:08:25.960><c> of</c><00:08:26.120><c> the</c><00:08:26.280><c> computation</c>

00:08:26.950 --> 00:08:26.960 align:start position:0%
on the whole history of the computation
 

00:08:26.960 --> 00:08:28.830 align:start position:0%
on the whole history of the computation
so<00:08:27.120><c> we</c><00:08:27.240><c> have</c><00:08:27.440><c> all</c><00:08:27.599><c> these</c><00:08:27.800><c> transient</c><00:08:28.400><c> States</c>

00:08:28.830 --> 00:08:28.840 align:start position:0%
so we have all these transient States
 

00:08:28.840 --> 00:08:30.510 align:start position:0%
so we have all these transient States
and<00:08:28.960><c> we're</c><00:08:29.080><c> going</c><00:08:29.199><c> to</c><00:08:29.520><c> commit</c><00:08:29.800><c> to</c><00:08:30.080><c> that</c><00:08:30.400><c> so</c>

00:08:30.510 --> 00:08:30.520 align:start position:0%
and we're going to commit to that so
 

00:08:30.520 --> 00:08:33.110 align:start position:0%
and we're going to commit to that so
it's<00:08:30.680><c> like</c><00:08:30.800><c> a</c><00:08:30.919><c> Merk</c><00:08:31.400><c> tree</c><00:08:32.200><c> where</c><00:08:32.360><c> the</c><00:08:32.560><c> leaves</c>

00:08:33.110 --> 00:08:33.120 align:start position:0%
it's like a Merk tree where the leaves
 

00:08:33.120 --> 00:08:35.709 align:start position:0%
it's like a Merk tree where the leaves
are<00:08:33.360><c> all</c><00:08:33.519><c> the</c><00:08:33.680><c> transient</c><00:08:34.240><c> States</c><00:08:34.880><c> we</c><00:08:35.039><c> meriz</c>

00:08:35.709 --> 00:08:35.719 align:start position:0%
are all the transient States we meriz
 

00:08:35.719 --> 00:08:38.430 align:start position:0%
are all the transient States we meriz
that<00:08:36.320><c> we</c><00:08:36.479><c> get</c><00:08:36.640><c> the</c><00:08:36.760><c> claim</c><00:08:37.479><c> so</c><00:08:37.599><c> we</c><00:08:37.800><c> turn</c><00:08:38.240><c> the</c>

00:08:38.430 --> 00:08:38.440 align:start position:0%
that we get the claim so we turn the
 

00:08:38.440 --> 00:08:41.310 align:start position:0%
that we get the claim so we turn the
dispute<00:08:39.279><c> not</c><00:08:39.680><c> just</c><00:08:39.839><c> on</c><00:08:40.000><c> the</c><00:08:40.159><c> final</c><00:08:40.479><c> state</c><00:08:41.159><c> but</c>

00:08:41.310 --> 00:08:41.320 align:start position:0%
dispute not just on the final state but
 

00:08:41.320 --> 00:08:43.350 align:start position:0%
dispute not just on the final state but
also<00:08:41.560><c> on</c><00:08:41.680><c> the</c><00:08:41.880><c> history</c><00:08:42.599><c> and</c><00:08:42.719><c> this</c><00:08:42.880><c> change</c><00:08:43.120><c> is</c>

00:08:43.350 --> 00:08:43.360 align:start position:0%
also on the history and this change is
 

00:08:43.360 --> 00:08:45.790 align:start position:0%
also on the history and this change is
important<00:08:44.360><c> because</c><00:08:44.839><c> we</c><00:08:45.040><c> remove</c><00:08:45.640><c> the</c>

00:08:45.790 --> 00:08:45.800 align:start position:0%
important because we remove the
 

00:08:45.800 --> 00:08:47.710 align:start position:0%
important because we remove the
possibility<00:08:46.320><c> of</c><00:08:46.480><c> false</c><00:08:46.760><c> flag</c><00:08:47.120><c> attacks</c><00:08:47.600><c> which</c>

00:08:47.710 --> 00:08:47.720 align:start position:0%
possibility of false flag attacks which
 

00:08:47.720 --> 00:08:49.070 align:start position:0%
possibility of false flag attacks which
are<00:08:47.880><c> quite</c><00:08:48.080><c> annoying</c><00:08:48.399><c> you</c><00:08:48.519><c> know</c><00:08:48.640><c> so</c><00:08:48.800><c> we</c><00:08:48.880><c> can</c>

00:08:49.070 --> 00:08:49.080 align:start position:0%
are quite annoying you know so we can
 

00:08:49.080 --> 00:08:52.230 align:start position:0%
are quite annoying you know so we can
join<00:08:50.000><c> a</c><00:08:50.240><c> s</c><00:08:51.040><c> claims</c><00:08:51.360><c> that</c><00:08:51.480><c> are</c><00:08:51.680><c> the</c><00:08:51.800><c> same</c>

00:08:52.230 --> 00:08:52.240 align:start position:0%
join a s claims that are the same
 

00:08:52.240 --> 00:08:53.949 align:start position:0%
join a s claims that are the same
together<00:08:52.480><c> on</c><00:08:52.640><c> the</c><00:08:52.760><c> same</c><00:08:52.920><c> team</c><00:08:53.680><c> and</c><00:08:53.800><c> this</c>

00:08:53.949 --> 00:08:53.959 align:start position:0%
together on the same team and this
 

00:08:53.959 --> 00:08:55.710 align:start position:0%
together on the same team and this
enables<00:08:54.519><c> a</c><00:08:54.640><c> whole</c><00:08:54.800><c> bunch</c><00:08:54.959><c> of</c><00:08:55.120><c> algorithms</c>

00:08:55.710 --> 00:08:55.720 align:start position:0%
enables a whole bunch of algorithms
 

00:08:55.720 --> 00:08:57.710 align:start position:0%
enables a whole bunch of algorithms
including<00:08:56.160><c> PRT</c><00:08:56.800><c> because</c><00:08:57.000><c> we</c><00:08:57.120><c> introduce</c><00:08:57.560><c> this</c>

00:08:57.710 --> 00:08:57.720 align:start position:0%
including PRT because we introduce this
 

00:08:57.720 --> 00:09:00.069 align:start position:0%
including PRT because we introduce this
technique<00:08:58.040><c> on</c><00:08:58.279><c> PRT</c><00:08:59.279><c> and</c><00:08:59.440><c> and</c><00:08:59.640><c> Dave</c><00:08:59.959><c> which</c>

00:09:00.069 --> 00:09:00.079 align:start position:0%
technique on PRT and and Dave which
 

00:09:00.079 --> 00:09:03.230 align:start position:0%
technique on PRT and and Dave which
we're<00:09:00.240><c> going</c><00:09:00.399><c> to</c><00:09:00.600><c> present</c>

00:09:03.230 --> 00:09:03.240 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:09:03.240 --> 00:09:05.310 align:start position:0%
 
today<00:09:04.240><c> now</c><00:09:04.519><c> the</c>

00:09:05.310 --> 00:09:05.320 align:start position:0%
today now the
 

00:09:05.320 --> 00:09:07.790 align:start position:0%
today now the
final<00:09:06.320><c> piece</c><00:09:06.959><c> to</c><00:09:07.160><c> get</c><00:09:07.320><c> all</c><00:09:07.519><c> like</c><00:09:07.680><c> The</c>

00:09:07.790 --> 00:09:07.800 align:start position:0%
final piece to get all like The
 

00:09:07.800 --> 00:09:10.269 align:start position:0%
final piece to get all like The
Primitives<00:09:08.720><c> is</c><00:09:08.959><c> deadlines</c><00:09:09.800><c> because</c><00:09:10.000><c> it's</c><00:09:10.120><c> an</c>

00:09:10.269 --> 00:09:10.279 align:start position:0%
Primitives is deadlines because it's an
 

00:09:10.279 --> 00:09:12.870 align:start position:0%
Primitives is deadlines because it's an
interactive<00:09:10.760><c> protocol</c><00:09:11.279><c> so</c><00:09:11.519><c> players</c><00:09:12.000><c> acting</c>

00:09:12.870 --> 00:09:12.880 align:start position:0%
interactive protocol so players acting
 

00:09:12.880 --> 00:09:15.550 align:start position:0%
interactive protocol so players acting
turns<00:09:13.880><c> uh</c><00:09:14.000><c> and</c><00:09:14.200><c> if</c><00:09:14.320><c> they</c><00:09:14.519><c> refuse</c><00:09:14.920><c> to</c><00:09:15.120><c> act</c><00:09:15.440><c> we</c>

00:09:15.550 --> 00:09:15.560 align:start position:0%
turns uh and if they refuse to act we
 

00:09:15.560 --> 00:09:17.750 align:start position:0%
turns uh and if they refuse to act we
need<00:09:15.720><c> to</c><00:09:15.839><c> do</c><00:09:16.079><c> something</c><00:09:16.600><c> so</c><00:09:16.760><c> we</c><00:09:16.880><c> need</c><00:09:17.000><c> to</c><00:09:17.160><c> set</c>

00:09:17.750 --> 00:09:17.760 align:start position:0%
need to do something so we need to set
 

00:09:17.760 --> 00:09:20.350 align:start position:0%
need to do something so we need to set
deadlines<00:09:18.760><c> to</c><00:09:19.120><c> eliminate</c><00:09:19.680><c> players</c><00:09:20.040><c> who</c><00:09:20.160><c> are</c>

00:09:20.350 --> 00:09:20.360 align:start position:0%
deadlines to eliminate players who are
 

00:09:20.360 --> 00:09:21.670 align:start position:0%
deadlines to eliminate players who are
not

00:09:21.670 --> 00:09:21.680 align:start position:0%
not
 

00:09:21.680 --> 00:09:24.030 align:start position:0%
not
cooperating<00:09:22.680><c> but</c><00:09:22.880><c> remember</c><00:09:23.560><c> we</c><00:09:23.680><c> have</c><00:09:23.880><c> the</c>

00:09:24.030 --> 00:09:24.040 align:start position:0%
cooperating but remember we have the
 

00:09:24.040 --> 00:09:26.949 align:start position:0%
cooperating but remember we have the
onewe<00:09:24.560><c> censorship</c><00:09:25.200><c> in</c><00:09:25.320><c> our</c><00:09:25.519><c> threat</c><00:09:25.880><c> model</c><00:09:26.640><c> so</c>

00:09:26.949 --> 00:09:26.959 align:start position:0%
onewe censorship in our threat model so
 

00:09:26.959 --> 00:09:29.990 align:start position:0%
onewe censorship in our threat model so
naively<00:09:27.720><c> we</c><00:09:27.839><c> would</c><00:09:28.040><c> have</c><00:09:28.200><c> to</c><00:09:28.399><c> set</c><00:09:28.800><c> a</c><00:09:28.959><c> one</c><00:09:29.440><c> week</c>

00:09:29.990 --> 00:09:30.000 align:start position:0%
naively we would have to set a one week
 

00:09:30.000 --> 00:09:32.030 align:start position:0%
naively we would have to set a one week
for<00:09:30.399><c> each</c><00:09:30.839><c> interaction</c><00:09:31.519><c> which</c><00:09:31.680><c> would</c><00:09:31.839><c> kill</c>

00:09:32.030 --> 00:09:32.040 align:start position:0%
for each interaction which would kill
 

00:09:32.040 --> 00:09:33.990 align:start position:0%
for each interaction which would kill
the<00:09:32.160><c> liveness</c><00:09:32.600><c> of</c><00:09:32.800><c> any</c>

00:09:33.990 --> 00:09:34.000 align:start position:0%
the liveness of any
 

00:09:34.000 --> 00:09:36.829 align:start position:0%
the liveness of any
protocol<00:09:35.000><c> so</c><00:09:35.279><c> what</c><00:09:35.440><c> we</c><00:09:35.640><c> instead</c><00:09:36.079><c> do</c><00:09:36.519><c> this</c><00:09:36.600><c> is</c><00:09:36.680><c> a</c>

00:09:36.829 --> 00:09:36.839 align:start position:0%
protocol so what we instead do this is a
 

00:09:36.839 --> 00:09:38.790 align:start position:0%
protocol so what we instead do this is a
technique<00:09:37.240><c> that</c><00:09:37.519><c> many</c><00:09:37.760><c> protocols</c><00:09:38.200><c> use</c><00:09:38.560><c> is</c>

00:09:38.790 --> 00:09:38.800 align:start position:0%
technique that many protocols use is
 

00:09:38.800 --> 00:09:40.870 align:start position:0%
technique that many protocols use is
something<00:09:39.079><c> like</c><00:09:39.200><c> a</c><00:09:39.320><c> chess</c><00:09:39.640><c> clock</c><00:09:40.560><c> so</c><00:09:40.760><c> this</c>

00:09:40.870 --> 00:09:40.880 align:start position:0%
something like a chess clock so this
 

00:09:40.880 --> 00:09:42.750 align:start position:0%
something like a chess clock so this
allows<00:09:41.160><c> you</c><00:09:41.279><c> to</c><00:09:41.519><c> amortize</c><00:09:42.079><c> this</c><00:09:42.240><c> one</c><00:09:42.440><c> week</c>

00:09:42.750 --> 00:09:42.760 align:start position:0%
allows you to amortize this one week
 

00:09:42.760 --> 00:09:45.430 align:start position:0%
allows you to amortize this one week
across<00:09:43.240><c> many</c><00:09:43.920><c> interactions</c><00:09:44.920><c> instead</c><00:09:45.240><c> of</c>

00:09:45.430 --> 00:09:45.440 align:start position:0%
across many interactions instead of
 

00:09:45.440 --> 00:09:47.150 align:start position:0%
across many interactions instead of
having<00:09:45.640><c> to</c><00:09:45.800><c> pay</c><00:09:46.040><c> it</c><00:09:46.160><c> for</c><00:09:46.519><c> every</c><00:09:46.800><c> single</c>

00:09:47.150 --> 00:09:47.160 align:start position:0%
having to pay it for every single
 

00:09:47.160 --> 00:09:49.710 align:start position:0%
having to pay it for every single
interaction<00:09:47.720><c> so</c><00:09:48.079><c> you</c><00:09:48.200><c> turn</c><00:09:48.560><c> from</c><00:09:48.880><c> like</c><00:09:49.560><c> the</c>

00:09:49.710 --> 00:09:49.720 align:start position:0%
interaction so you turn from like the
 

00:09:49.720 --> 00:09:52.430 align:start position:0%
interaction so you turn from like the
sday<00:09:50.240><c> multiplying</c><00:09:51.000><c> each</c><00:09:51.240><c> interaction</c><00:09:52.120><c> for</c><00:09:52.360><c> it</c>

00:09:52.430 --> 00:09:52.440 align:start position:0%
sday multiplying each interaction for it
 

00:09:52.440 --> 00:09:55.389 align:start position:0%
sday multiplying each interaction for it
to<00:09:52.560><c> being</c><00:09:52.760><c> like</c><00:09:52.880><c> an</c><00:09:53.200><c> additive</c><00:09:54.200><c> uh</c><00:09:54.680><c> part</c><00:09:54.880><c> of</c><00:09:55.000><c> the</c>

00:09:55.389 --> 00:09:55.399 align:start position:0%
to being like an additive uh part of the
 

00:09:55.399 --> 00:09:58.389 align:start position:0%
to being like an additive uh part of the
expression<00:09:56.399><c> and</c><00:09:56.560><c> then</c><00:09:57.320><c> you</c><00:09:57.519><c> only</c><00:09:57.760><c> need</c><00:09:57.959><c> to</c><00:09:58.200><c> pay</c>

00:09:58.389 --> 00:09:58.399 align:start position:0%
expression and then you only need to pay
 

00:09:58.399 --> 00:10:00.069 align:start position:0%
expression and then you only need to pay
for<00:09:58.600><c> each</c><00:09:58.800><c> interaction</c><00:09:59.399><c> the</c><00:09:59.480><c> real</c><00:09:59.720><c> time</c><00:09:59.920><c> of</c>

00:10:00.069 --> 00:10:00.079 align:start position:0%
for each interaction the real time of
 

00:10:00.079 --> 00:10:01.790 align:start position:0%
for each interaction the real time of
that<00:10:00.240><c> interaction</c><00:10:00.959><c> in</c><00:10:01.079><c> the</c><00:10:01.240><c> absence</c><00:10:01.600><c> of</c>

00:10:01.790 --> 00:10:01.800 align:start position:0%
that interaction in the absence of
 

00:10:01.800 --> 00:10:03.870 align:start position:0%
that interaction in the absence of
censorship<00:10:02.800><c> because</c><00:10:03.000><c> an</c><00:10:03.160><c> interaction</c><00:10:03.600><c> is</c>

00:10:03.870 --> 00:10:03.880 align:start position:0%
censorship because an interaction is
 

00:10:03.880 --> 00:10:06.230 align:start position:0%
censorship because an interaction is
quite<00:10:04.160><c> fast</c><00:10:04.480><c> you</c><00:10:04.600><c> know</c><00:10:04.760><c> it's</c><00:10:04.920><c> like</c><00:10:05.120><c> 5</c><00:10:05.360><c> minutes</c>

00:10:06.230 --> 00:10:06.240 align:start position:0%
quite fast you know it's like 5 minutes
 

00:10:06.240 --> 00:10:08.350 align:start position:0%
quite fast you know it's like 5 minutes
uh<00:10:06.399><c> and</c><00:10:06.560><c> we</c><00:10:06.680><c> don't</c><00:10:06.800><c> want</c><00:10:06.920><c> to</c><00:10:07.120><c> play</c><00:10:07.560><c> pay</c><00:10:07.959><c> on</c><00:10:08.200><c> top</c>

00:10:08.350 --> 00:10:08.360 align:start position:0%
uh and we don't want to play pay on top
 

00:10:08.360 --> 00:10:10.910 align:start position:0%
uh and we don't want to play pay on top
of<00:10:08.519><c> that</c><00:10:08.720><c> five</c><00:10:08.920><c> minutes</c><00:10:09.640><c> seven</c><00:10:10.040><c> days</c><00:10:10.640><c> so</c><00:10:10.800><c> we</c>

00:10:10.910 --> 00:10:10.920 align:start position:0%
of that five minutes seven days so we
 

00:10:10.920 --> 00:10:13.350 align:start position:0%
of that five minutes seven days so we
use<00:10:11.079><c> the</c><00:10:11.200><c> chess</c><00:10:11.480><c> clock</c><00:10:11.720><c> to</c><00:10:11.880><c> amortize</c>

00:10:13.350 --> 00:10:13.360 align:start position:0%
use the chess clock to amortize
 

00:10:13.360 --> 00:10:16.230 align:start position:0%
use the chess clock to amortize
that<00:10:14.360><c> now</c><00:10:14.800><c> let's</c><00:10:15.040><c> generalize</c><00:10:15.720><c> this</c><00:10:15.920><c> this</c><00:10:16.040><c> is</c><00:10:16.120><c> a</c>

00:10:16.230 --> 00:10:16.240 align:start position:0%
that now let's generalize this this is a
 

00:10:16.240 --> 00:10:18.430 align:start position:0%
that now let's generalize this this is a
pawise<00:10:16.760><c> reputation</c><00:10:17.320><c> first</c><00:10:17.800><c> now</c><00:10:17.959><c> let's</c><00:10:18.160><c> do</c><00:10:18.320><c> a</c>

00:10:18.430 --> 00:10:18.440 align:start position:0%
pawise reputation first now let's do a
 

00:10:18.440 --> 00:10:20.150 align:start position:0%
pawise reputation first now let's do a
multiparty

00:10:20.150 --> 00:10:20.160 align:start position:0%
multiparty
 

00:10:20.160 --> 00:10:23.150 align:start position:0%
multiparty
reputation<00:10:21.160><c> and</c><00:10:21.360><c> there</c><00:10:21.519><c> are</c><00:10:21.959><c> two</c><00:10:22.560><c> high</c><00:10:22.760><c> level</c>

00:10:23.150 --> 00:10:23.160 align:start position:0%
reputation and there are two high level
 

00:10:23.160 --> 00:10:25.910 align:start position:0%
reputation and there are two high level
approaches<00:10:24.160><c> one</c><00:10:24.560><c> is</c><00:10:24.800><c> the</c><00:10:24.959><c> parallel</c><00:10:25.440><c> approach</c>

00:10:25.910 --> 00:10:25.920 align:start position:0%
approaches one is the parallel approach
 

00:10:25.920 --> 00:10:30.389 align:start position:0%
approaches one is the parallel approach
which<00:10:26.279><c> is</c><00:10:27.279><c> more</c><00:10:28.120><c> like</c><00:10:28.360><c> what</c><00:10:28.560><c> bold</c><00:10:28.920><c> uses</c>

00:10:30.389 --> 00:10:30.399 align:start position:0%
which is more like what bold uses
 

00:10:30.399 --> 00:10:32.110 align:start position:0%
which is more like what bold uses
uh<00:10:30.560><c> and</c><00:10:30.839><c> the</c><00:10:31.000><c> good</c><00:10:31.200><c> part</c><00:10:31.360><c> of</c><00:10:31.519><c> it</c><00:10:31.680><c> is</c><00:10:31.839><c> that</c><00:10:32.000><c> it</c>

00:10:32.110 --> 00:10:32.120 align:start position:0%
uh and the good part of it is that it
 

00:10:32.120 --> 00:10:36.350 align:start position:0%
uh and the good part of it is that it
finishes<00:10:32.839><c> fast</c><00:10:33.839><c> so</c><00:10:34.040><c> we</c><00:10:34.200><c> have</c><00:10:34.480><c> Willie</c><00:10:35.360><c> engaging</c>

00:10:36.350 --> 00:10:36.360 align:start position:0%
finishes fast so we have Willie engaging
 

00:10:36.360 --> 00:10:38.990 align:start position:0%
finishes fast so we have Willie engaging
every<00:10:36.600><c> other</c><00:10:36.880><c> claim</c><00:10:37.760><c> in</c><00:10:38.000><c> parallel</c><00:10:38.720><c> at</c><00:10:38.880><c> the</c>

00:10:38.990 --> 00:10:39.000 align:start position:0%
every other claim in parallel at the
 

00:10:39.000 --> 00:10:41.110 align:start position:0%
every other claim in parallel at the
same<00:10:39.279><c> time</c><00:10:40.200><c> but</c><00:10:40.320><c> the</c><00:10:40.480><c> problem</c><00:10:40.720><c> is</c><00:10:40.839><c> that</c><00:10:41.000><c> we</c>

00:10:41.110 --> 00:10:41.120 align:start position:0%
same time but the problem is that we
 

00:10:41.120 --> 00:10:43.590 align:start position:0%
same time but the problem is that we
incurred<00:10:41.440><c> a</c><00:10:41.560><c> chance</c><00:10:41.920><c> of</c><00:10:42.160><c> overwhelming</c><00:10:42.920><c> Willie</c>

00:10:43.590 --> 00:10:43.600 align:start position:0%
incurred a chance of overwhelming Willie
 

00:10:43.600 --> 00:10:45.069 align:start position:0%
incurred a chance of overwhelming Willie
right<00:10:43.760><c> so</c><00:10:43.959><c> imagine</c><00:10:44.279><c> that</c><00:10:44.440><c> instead</c><00:10:44.680><c> of</c><00:10:44.839><c> only</c>

00:10:45.069 --> 00:10:45.079 align:start position:0%
right so imagine that instead of only
 

00:10:45.079 --> 00:10:47.870 align:start position:0%
right so imagine that instead of only
five<00:10:45.880><c> we</c><00:10:46.000><c> had</c><00:10:46.160><c> like</c><00:10:46.320><c> one</c><00:10:46.480><c> million</c><00:10:46.760><c> sibl</c><00:10:47.680><c> would</c>

00:10:47.870 --> 00:10:47.880 align:start position:0%
five we had like one million sibl would
 

00:10:47.880 --> 00:10:49.870 align:start position:0%
five we had like one million sibl would
have<00:10:48.279><c> Willie</c><00:10:48.680><c> trying</c><00:10:48.959><c> to</c><00:10:49.079><c> fight</c><00:10:49.360><c> everybody</c><00:10:49.760><c> at</c>

00:10:49.870 --> 00:10:49.880 align:start position:0%
have Willie trying to fight everybody at
 

00:10:49.880 --> 00:10:51.829 align:start position:0%
have Willie trying to fight everybody at
the<00:10:50.000><c> same</c><00:10:50.240><c> time</c><00:10:51.240><c> and</c><00:10:51.360><c> he</c><00:10:51.519><c> could</c><00:10:51.680><c> get</c>

00:10:51.829 --> 00:10:51.839 align:start position:0%
the same time and he could get
 

00:10:51.839 --> 00:10:55.509 align:start position:0%
the same time and he could get
overwhelmed<00:10:52.760><c> and</c><00:10:52.920><c> lose</c><00:10:53.560><c> and</c><00:10:53.720><c> lose</c><00:10:53.959><c> a</c><00:10:54.360><c> tvl</c><00:10:55.360><c> so</c>

00:10:55.509 --> 00:10:55.519 align:start position:0%
overwhelmed and lose and lose a tvl so
 

00:10:55.519 --> 00:10:57.629 align:start position:0%
overwhelmed and lose and lose a tvl so
we<00:10:55.680><c> have</c><00:10:55.839><c> this</c><00:10:56.000><c> you</c><00:10:56.120><c> know</c><00:10:56.320><c> oh</c><00:10:56.519><c> it's</c><00:10:56.760><c> fast</c><00:10:57.440><c> but</c>

00:10:57.629 --> 00:10:57.639 align:start position:0%
we have this you know oh it's fast but
 

00:10:57.639 --> 00:11:00.069 align:start position:0%
we have this you know oh it's fast but
it<00:10:57.760><c> might</c><00:10:58.000><c> overwhelm</c><00:10:58.639><c> Willie</c>

00:11:00.069 --> 00:11:00.079 align:start position:0%
it might overwhelm Willie
 

00:11:00.079 --> 00:11:01.949 align:start position:0%
it might overwhelm Willie
and<00:11:00.240><c> we</c><00:11:00.360><c> can</c><00:11:00.600><c> mitigate</c><00:11:01.079><c> that</c><00:11:01.320><c> by</c><00:11:01.519><c> increasing</c>

00:11:01.949 --> 00:11:01.959 align:start position:0%
and we can mitigate that by increasing
 

00:11:01.959 --> 00:11:04.310 align:start position:0%
and we can mitigate that by increasing
bonds<00:11:02.399><c> but</c><00:11:02.519><c> then</c><00:11:02.639><c> we</c><00:11:02.760><c> start</c><00:11:03.040><c> centralizing</c><00:11:03.680><c> the</c>

00:11:04.310 --> 00:11:04.320 align:start position:0%
bonds but then we start centralizing the
 

00:11:04.320 --> 00:11:06.750 align:start position:0%
bonds but then we start centralizing the
algorithm<00:11:05.320><c> uh</c><00:11:05.440><c> with</c><00:11:05.680><c> PR2</c><00:11:06.240><c> which</c><00:11:06.360><c> is</c><00:11:06.480><c> our</c>

00:11:06.750 --> 00:11:06.760 align:start position:0%
algorithm uh with PR2 which is our
 

00:11:06.760 --> 00:11:08.590 align:start position:0%
algorithm uh with PR2 which is our
previous<00:11:07.040><c> algorithm</c><00:11:07.680><c> we</c><00:11:07.800><c> went</c><00:11:08.000><c> a</c><00:11:08.160><c> different</c>

00:11:08.590 --> 00:11:08.600 align:start position:0%
previous algorithm we went a different
 

00:11:08.600 --> 00:11:11.670 align:start position:0%
previous algorithm we went a different
route<00:11:09.600><c> uh</c><00:11:09.760><c> we</c><00:11:09.880><c> use</c><00:11:10.360><c> this</c><00:11:10.639><c> tournament</c><00:11:11.279><c> idea</c>

00:11:11.670 --> 00:11:11.680 align:start position:0%
route uh we use this tournament idea
 

00:11:11.680 --> 00:11:13.230 align:start position:0%
route uh we use this tournament idea
right<00:11:11.800><c> so</c><00:11:11.959><c> we</c><00:11:12.079><c> put</c><00:11:12.240><c> sybl</c><00:11:12.600><c> to</c><00:11:12.760><c> fight</c><00:11:13.000><c> against</c>

00:11:13.230 --> 00:11:13.240 align:start position:0%
right so we put sybl to fight against
 

00:11:13.240 --> 00:11:15.670 align:start position:0%
right so we put sybl to fight against
other<00:11:13.600><c> cbbls</c><00:11:14.600><c> so</c><00:11:14.760><c> the</c><00:11:14.880><c> number</c><00:11:15.120><c> of</c><00:11:15.279><c> round</c><00:11:15.519><c> is</c>

00:11:15.670 --> 00:11:15.680 align:start position:0%
other cbbls so the number of round is
 

00:11:15.680 --> 00:11:18.069 align:start position:0%
other cbbls so the number of round is
logarithmic<00:11:16.560><c> the</c><00:11:16.760><c> expenses</c><00:11:17.200><c> are</c><00:11:17.360><c> logarithmic</c>

00:11:18.069 --> 00:11:18.079 align:start position:0%
logarithmic the expenses are logarithmic
 

00:11:18.079 --> 00:11:20.470 align:start position:0%
logarithmic the expenses are logarithmic
and<00:11:18.200><c> the</c><00:11:18.360><c> delay</c><00:11:18.720><c> is</c><00:11:18.959><c> logarithmic</c><00:11:19.959><c> so</c><00:11:20.160><c> this</c><00:11:20.320><c> all</c>

00:11:20.470 --> 00:11:20.480 align:start position:0%
and the delay is logarithmic so this all
 

00:11:20.480 --> 00:11:23.110 align:start position:0%
and the delay is logarithmic so this all
means<00:11:21.160><c> exponential</c><00:11:21.800><c> Advantage</c><00:11:22.600><c> willly</c><00:11:23.000><c> has</c>

00:11:23.110 --> 00:11:23.120 align:start position:0%
means exponential Advantage willly has
 

00:11:23.120 --> 00:11:26.710 align:start position:0%
means exponential Advantage willly has
an<00:11:23.279><c> exponential</c><00:11:23.839><c> advantage</c><00:11:24.320><c> on</c><00:11:24.560><c> delay</c><00:11:25.560><c> and</c>

00:11:26.710 --> 00:11:26.720 align:start position:0%
an exponential advantage on delay and
 

00:11:26.720 --> 00:11:30.150 align:start position:0%
an exponential advantage on delay and
resources<00:11:27.720><c> but</c><00:11:28.600><c> each</c><00:11:28.880><c> round</c><00:11:29.360><c> takes</c><00:11:29.560><c> a</c><00:11:29.720><c> week</c>

00:11:30.150 --> 00:11:30.160 align:start position:0%
resources but each round takes a week
 

00:11:30.160 --> 00:11:31.710 align:start position:0%
resources but each round takes a week
because<00:11:30.399><c> of</c><00:11:30.519><c> the</c><00:11:30.639><c> censorship</c><00:11:31.120><c> you</c><00:11:31.240><c> know</c><00:11:31.360><c> even</c>

00:11:31.710 --> 00:11:31.720 align:start position:0%
because of the censorship you know even
 

00:11:31.720 --> 00:11:35.350 align:start position:0%
because of the censorship you know even
amortising<00:11:32.720><c> the</c><00:11:32.880><c> week</c><00:11:33.160><c> across</c><00:11:33.519><c> a</c><00:11:34.040><c> match</c><00:11:35.040><c> every</c>

00:11:35.350 --> 00:11:35.360 align:start position:0%
amortising the week across a match every
 

00:11:35.360 --> 00:11:37.590 align:start position:0%
amortising the week across a match every
match<00:11:35.760><c> every</c><00:11:36.040><c> round</c><00:11:36.440><c> still</c><00:11:36.839><c> has</c><00:11:37.000><c> to</c><00:11:37.279><c> last</c><00:11:37.480><c> at</c>

00:11:37.590 --> 00:11:37.600 align:start position:0%
match every round still has to last at
 

00:11:37.600 --> 00:11:40.750 align:start position:0%
match every round still has to last at
least<00:11:37.800><c> a</c><00:11:38.120><c> week</c><00:11:39.120><c> so</c><00:11:39.360><c> if</c><00:11:39.480><c> we</c><00:11:39.680><c> imagine</c><00:11:40.200><c> this</c><00:11:40.440><c> the</c>

00:11:40.750 --> 00:11:40.760 align:start position:0%
least a week so if we imagine this the
 

00:11:40.760 --> 00:11:43.550 align:start position:0%
least a week so if we imagine this the
analogous<00:11:41.760><c> uh</c><00:11:42.040><c> of</c><00:11:42.279><c> 1</c><00:11:42.480><c> million</c><00:11:42.760><c> sibles</c><00:11:43.240><c> here</c>

00:11:43.550 --> 00:11:43.560 align:start position:0%
analogous uh of 1 million sibles here
 

00:11:43.560 --> 00:11:46.069 align:start position:0%
analogous uh of 1 million sibles here
there<00:11:43.680><c> will</c><00:11:43.920><c> be</c><00:11:44.200><c> 20</c><00:11:44.639><c> rounds</c><00:11:45.440><c> so</c><00:11:45.600><c> it</c><00:11:45.720><c> will</c><00:11:45.880><c> take</c>

00:11:46.069 --> 00:11:46.079 align:start position:0%
there will be 20 rounds so it will take
 

00:11:46.079 --> 00:11:50.550 align:start position:0%
there will be 20 rounds so it will take
20<00:11:46.720><c> weeks</c><00:11:47.720><c> which</c><00:11:47.839><c> is</c><00:11:48.079><c> high</c><00:11:48.360><c> you</c><00:11:48.480><c> know</c><00:11:49.440><c> uh</c><00:11:49.959><c> but</c>

00:11:50.550 --> 00:11:50.560 align:start position:0%
20 weeks which is high you know uh but
 

00:11:50.560 --> 00:11:52.710 align:start position:0%
20 weeks which is high you know uh but
matches<00:11:51.040><c> only</c><00:11:51.279><c> take</c><00:11:51.519><c> two</c><00:11:51.760><c> hours</c><00:11:52.200><c> in</c><00:11:52.399><c> practice</c>

00:11:52.710 --> 00:11:52.720 align:start position:0%
matches only take two hours in practice
 

00:11:52.720 --> 00:11:54.629 align:start position:0%
matches only take two hours in practice
you<00:11:52.839><c> know</c><00:11:52.959><c> in</c><00:11:53.079><c> the</c><00:11:53.279><c> absence</c><00:11:53.560><c> of</c><00:11:53.720><c> censorship</c>

00:11:54.629 --> 00:11:54.639 align:start position:0%
you know in the absence of censorship
 

00:11:54.639 --> 00:11:57.069 align:start position:0%
you know in the absence of censorship
they<00:11:54.800><c> would</c><00:11:55.040><c> take</c><00:11:55.240><c> two</c><00:11:55.480><c> hours</c><00:11:56.360><c> but</c><00:11:56.560><c> because</c>

00:11:57.069 --> 00:11:57.079 align:start position:0%
they would take two hours but because
 

00:11:57.079 --> 00:11:58.870 align:start position:0%
they would take two hours but because
there<00:11:57.320><c> could</c><00:11:57.519><c> be</c><00:11:57.680><c> censorship</c><00:11:58.279><c> we</c><00:11:58.399><c> need</c><00:11:58.560><c> to</c><00:11:58.720><c> add</c>

00:11:58.870 --> 00:11:58.880 align:start position:0%
there could be censorship we need to add
 

00:11:58.880 --> 00:11:59.829 align:start position:0%
there could be censorship we need to add
the<00:11:59.000><c> week</c>

00:11:59.829 --> 00:11:59.839 align:start position:0%
the week
 

00:11:59.839 --> 00:12:03.470 align:start position:0%
the week
so<00:12:00.279><c> we</c><00:12:00.440><c> were</c><00:12:00.639><c> thinking</c><00:12:01.600><c> oh</c><00:12:02.600><c> why</c><00:12:02.760><c> don't</c><00:12:02.959><c> we</c><00:12:03.200><c> try</c>

00:12:03.470 --> 00:12:03.480 align:start position:0%
so we were thinking oh why don't we try
 

00:12:03.480 --> 00:12:06.949 align:start position:0%
so we were thinking oh why don't we try
to<00:12:03.920><c> amortize</c><00:12:04.920><c> this</c><00:12:05.120><c> one</c><00:12:05.440><c> week</c><00:12:06.360><c> not</c><00:12:06.600><c> only</c>

00:12:06.949 --> 00:12:06.959 align:start position:0%
to amortize this one week not only
 

00:12:06.959 --> 00:12:09.310 align:start position:0%
to amortize this one week not only
inside<00:12:07.320><c> a</c><00:12:07.480><c> single</c><00:12:07.760><c> round</c><00:12:08.240><c> but</c><00:12:08.480><c> across</c><00:12:09.160><c> the</c>

00:12:09.310 --> 00:12:09.320 align:start position:0%
inside a single round but across the
 

00:12:09.320 --> 00:12:12.870 align:start position:0%
inside a single round but across the
entire<00:12:10.200><c> dispute</c><00:12:11.200><c> so</c><00:12:11.519><c> this</c><00:12:11.680><c> is</c><00:12:12.000><c> what</c><00:12:12.399><c> we'll</c><00:12:12.680><c> try</c>

00:12:12.870 --> 00:12:12.880 align:start position:0%
entire dispute so this is what we'll try
 

00:12:12.880 --> 00:12:15.189 align:start position:0%
entire dispute so this is what we'll try
to<00:12:13.000><c> do</c><00:12:13.199><c> so</c><00:12:13.360><c> what</c><00:12:13.480><c> I</c><00:12:13.720><c> present</c><00:12:14.079><c> now</c><00:12:14.839><c> is</c><00:12:14.959><c> an</c>

00:12:15.189 --> 00:12:15.199 align:start position:0%
to do so what I present now is an
 

00:12:15.199 --> 00:12:17.910 align:start position:0%
to do so what I present now is an
attempt<00:12:15.880><c> to</c><00:12:16.160><c> accomplish</c>

00:12:17.910 --> 00:12:17.920 align:start position:0%
attempt to accomplish
 

00:12:17.920 --> 00:12:20.990 align:start position:0%
attempt to accomplish
that<00:12:18.920><c> okay</c><00:12:19.120><c> so</c><00:12:20.000><c> the</c><00:12:20.120><c> algorithm</c><00:12:20.600><c> is</c><00:12:20.720><c> called</c>

00:12:20.990 --> 00:12:21.000 align:start position:0%
that okay so the algorithm is called
 

00:12:21.000 --> 00:12:24.990 align:start position:0%
that okay so the algorithm is called
Dave<00:12:21.560><c> uh</c><00:12:21.680><c> and</c><00:12:21.760><c> it's</c><00:12:21.959><c> just</c>

00:12:24.990 --> 00:12:25.000 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:12:25.000 --> 00:12:27.110 align:start position:0%
 
Dave<00:12:26.000><c> it's</c><00:12:26.160><c> not</c><00:12:26.320><c> an</c>

00:12:27.110 --> 00:12:27.120 align:start position:0%
Dave it's not an
 

00:12:27.120 --> 00:12:29.710 align:start position:0%
Dave it's not an
acronym<00:12:28.120><c> uh</c><00:12:28.240><c> it's</c><00:12:28.440><c> based</c><00:12:28.639><c> on</c><00:12:28.760><c> the</c><00:12:28.920><c> D</c><00:12:29.320><c> versus</c>

00:12:29.710 --> 00:12:29.720 align:start position:0%
acronym uh it's based on the D versus
 

00:12:29.720 --> 00:12:30.829 align:start position:0%
acronym uh it's based on the D versus
Goliath

00:12:30.829 --> 00:12:30.839 align:start position:0%
Goliath
 

00:12:30.839 --> 00:12:35.750 align:start position:0%
Goliath
archetype<00:12:31.839><c> uh</c><00:12:32.399><c> because</c><00:12:33.399><c> anyway</c><00:12:34.480><c> um</c><00:12:35.480><c> so</c><00:12:35.639><c> the</c>

00:12:35.750 --> 00:12:35.760 align:start position:0%
archetype uh because anyway um so the
 

00:12:35.760 --> 00:12:37.990 align:start position:0%
archetype uh because anyway um so the
first<00:12:35.959><c> change</c><00:12:36.199><c> we</c><00:12:36.399><c> make</c><00:12:37.000><c> uh</c><00:12:37.120><c> is</c><00:12:37.240><c> we</c><00:12:37.399><c> change</c><00:12:37.839><c> the</c>

00:12:37.990 --> 00:12:38.000 align:start position:0%
first change we make uh is we change the
 

00:12:38.000 --> 00:12:40.110 align:start position:0%
first change we make uh is we change the
tournament<00:12:38.399><c> to</c><00:12:38.519><c> a</c><00:12:38.680><c> repage</c>

00:12:40.110 --> 00:12:40.120 align:start position:0%
tournament to a repage
 

00:12:40.120 --> 00:12:42.310 align:start position:0%
tournament to a repage
tournament<00:12:41.120><c> this</c><00:12:41.240><c> is</c><00:12:41.320><c> a</c><00:12:41.480><c> fancy</c><00:12:41.800><c> name</c><00:12:42.040><c> just</c><00:12:42.199><c> to</c>

00:12:42.310 --> 00:12:42.320 align:start position:0%
tournament this is a fancy name just to
 

00:12:42.320 --> 00:12:44.670 align:start position:0%
tournament this is a fancy name just to
mean<00:12:42.720><c> matches</c><00:12:43.040><c> are</c><00:12:43.279><c> not</c><00:12:43.600><c> eliminatory</c><00:12:44.519><c> you</c>

00:12:44.670 --> 00:12:44.680 align:start position:0%
mean matches are not eliminatory you
 

00:12:44.680 --> 00:12:48.110 align:start position:0%
mean matches are not eliminatory you
don't<00:12:45.199><c> eliminate</c><00:12:46.199><c> um</c><00:12:46.800><c> a</c><00:12:47.000><c> claim</c><00:12:47.519><c> as</c><00:12:47.600><c> soon</c><00:12:47.800><c> as</c><00:12:47.959><c> it</c>

00:12:48.110 --> 00:12:48.120 align:start position:0%
don't eliminate um a claim as soon as it
 

00:12:48.120 --> 00:12:50.470 align:start position:0%
don't eliminate um a claim as soon as it
loses<00:12:49.000><c> you</c><00:12:49.199><c> give</c><00:12:49.320><c> it</c><00:12:49.440><c> a</c><00:12:49.600><c> while</c><00:12:50.000><c> you</c><00:12:50.120><c> know</c><00:12:50.320><c> it</c>

00:12:50.470 --> 00:12:50.480 align:start position:0%
loses you give it a while you know it
 

00:12:50.480 --> 00:12:52.750 align:start position:0%
loses you give it a while you know it
has<00:12:50.639><c> to</c><00:12:50.800><c> lose</c><00:12:51.160><c> multiple</c><00:12:51.680><c> times</c><00:12:52.079><c> before</c><00:12:52.399><c> it's</c>

00:12:52.750 --> 00:12:52.760 align:start position:0%
has to lose multiple times before it's
 

00:12:52.760 --> 00:12:55.310 align:start position:0%
has to lose multiple times before it's
finally<00:12:53.360><c> eliminated</c><00:12:54.360><c> so</c><00:12:54.560><c> this</c><00:12:54.639><c> is</c><00:12:54.760><c> what</c><00:12:54.920><c> repes</c>

00:12:55.310 --> 00:12:55.320 align:start position:0%
finally eliminated so this is what repes
 

00:12:55.320 --> 00:12:57.910 align:start position:0%
finally eliminated so this is what repes
Char<00:12:55.519><c> means</c><00:12:56.199><c> now</c><00:12:56.440><c> don't</c><00:12:56.639><c> try</c><00:12:56.880><c> to</c><00:12:57.040><c> think</c><00:12:57.279><c> about</c>

00:12:57.910 --> 00:12:57.920 align:start position:0%
Char means now don't try to think about
 

00:12:57.920 --> 00:12:59.870 align:start position:0%
Char means now don't try to think about
how<00:12:58.120><c> long</c><00:12:58.399><c> this</c><00:12:58.519><c> will</c><00:12:58.760><c> take</c><00:12:59.199><c> forget</c><00:12:59.519><c> that</c>

00:12:59.870 --> 00:12:59.880 align:start position:0%
how long this will take forget that
 

00:12:59.880 --> 00:13:02.629 align:start position:0%
how long this will take forget that
let's<00:13:00.160><c> just</c><00:13:00.519><c> think</c><00:13:00.720><c> on</c><00:13:00.920><c> the</c><00:13:01.160><c> soundness</c><00:13:01.760><c> of</c><00:13:01.920><c> it</c>

00:13:02.629 --> 00:13:02.639 align:start position:0%
let's just think on the soundness of it
 

00:13:02.639 --> 00:13:05.430 align:start position:0%
let's just think on the soundness of it
I<00:13:02.760><c> want</c><00:13:03.279><c> on</c><00:13:03.480><c> this</c><00:13:03.639><c> slide</c><00:13:04.560><c> to</c><00:13:04.800><c> convince</c><00:13:05.199><c> you</c>

00:13:05.430 --> 00:13:05.440 align:start position:0%
I want on this slide to convince you
 

00:13:05.440 --> 00:13:07.790 align:start position:0%
I want on this slide to convince you
that<00:13:05.680><c> Willie</c><00:13:06.199><c> won't</c><00:13:06.680><c> lose</c><00:13:07.320><c> and</c><00:13:07.480><c> he</c><00:13:07.600><c> will</c>

00:13:07.790 --> 00:13:07.800 align:start position:0%
that Willie won't lose and he will
 

00:13:07.800 --> 00:13:10.069 align:start position:0%
that Willie won't lose and he will
defeat<00:13:08.199><c> everybody</c><00:13:08.720><c> let's</c><00:13:08.959><c> think</c><00:13:09.160><c> about</c><00:13:09.360><c> time</c>

00:13:10.069 --> 00:13:10.079 align:start position:0%
defeat everybody let's think about time
 

00:13:10.079 --> 00:13:13.629 align:start position:0%
defeat everybody let's think about time
later<00:13:11.079><c> um</c><00:13:12.079><c> yeah</c><00:13:12.199><c> so</c><00:13:12.399><c> imagine</c><00:13:12.880><c> that</c><00:13:13.320><c> we</c><00:13:13.480><c> have</c>

00:13:13.629 --> 00:13:13.639 align:start position:0%
later um yeah so imagine that we have
 

00:13:13.639 --> 00:13:16.230 align:start position:0%
later um yeah so imagine that we have
the<00:13:13.800><c> censorship</c><00:13:14.279><c> of</c><00:13:14.399><c> one</c><00:13:14.600><c> week</c><00:13:15.320><c> but</c><00:13:15.600><c> we</c><00:13:15.839><c> reduce</c>

00:13:16.230 --> 00:13:16.240 align:start position:0%
the censorship of one week but we reduce
 

00:13:16.240 --> 00:13:18.910 align:start position:0%
the censorship of one week but we reduce
the<00:13:16.360><c> rounds</c><00:13:16.760><c> the</c><00:13:16.880><c> matches</c><00:13:17.279><c> to</c><00:13:17.519><c> one</c><00:13:17.800><c> day</c><00:13:18.440><c> so</c>

00:13:18.910 --> 00:13:18.920 align:start position:0%
the rounds the matches to one day so
 

00:13:18.920 --> 00:13:22.430 align:start position:0%
the rounds the matches to one day so
every<00:13:19.639><c> one</c><00:13:20.199><c> day</c><00:13:21.079><c> they</c><00:13:21.360><c> rematches</c><00:13:22.040><c> everybody</c>

00:13:22.430 --> 00:13:22.440 align:start position:0%
every one day they rematches everybody
 

00:13:22.440 --> 00:13:25.269 align:start position:0%
every one day they rematches everybody
including<00:13:23.040><c> Willie</c><00:13:24.040><c> uh</c><00:13:24.160><c> and</c><00:13:24.279><c> then</c><00:13:24.440><c> they</c><00:13:24.639><c> fight</c>

00:13:25.269 --> 00:13:25.279 align:start position:0%
including Willie uh and then they fight
 

00:13:25.279 --> 00:13:27.550 align:start position:0%
including Willie uh and then they fight
the<00:13:25.440><c> next</c><00:13:25.680><c> day</c><00:13:25.880><c> rematches</c><00:13:26.440><c> everybody</c><00:13:26.920><c> again</c>

00:13:27.550 --> 00:13:27.560 align:start position:0%
the next day rematches everybody again
 

00:13:27.560 --> 00:13:30.189 align:start position:0%
the next day rematches everybody again
and<00:13:27.760><c> so</c><00:13:28.000><c> on</c><00:13:28.880><c> when</c><00:13:29.240><c> know</c><00:13:29.440><c> that</c><00:13:29.600><c> Willie</c><00:13:29.959><c> can't</c>

00:13:30.189 --> 00:13:30.199 align:start position:0%
and so on when know that Willie can't
 

00:13:30.199 --> 00:13:33.150 align:start position:0%
and so on when know that Willie can't
lose<00:13:31.120><c> unless</c><00:13:31.480><c> there's</c><00:13:31.760><c> censorship</c><00:13:32.760><c> but</c><00:13:32.959><c> even</c>

00:13:33.150 --> 00:13:33.160 align:start position:0%
lose unless there's censorship but even
 

00:13:33.160 --> 00:13:34.910 align:start position:0%
lose unless there's censorship but even
if<00:13:33.320><c> there's</c><00:13:33.600><c> censorship</c><00:13:34.320><c> we</c><00:13:34.480><c> know</c><00:13:34.720><c> that</c>

00:13:34.910 --> 00:13:34.920 align:start position:0%
if there's censorship we know that
 

00:13:34.920 --> 00:13:37.629 align:start position:0%
if there's censorship we know that
Willie<00:13:35.399><c> can't</c><00:13:35.639><c> lose</c><00:13:36.000><c> more</c><00:13:36.199><c> than</c><00:13:36.399><c> seven</c><00:13:36.760><c> times</c>

00:13:37.629 --> 00:13:37.639 align:start position:0%
Willie can't lose more than seven times
 

00:13:37.639 --> 00:13:40.269 align:start position:0%
Willie can't lose more than seven times
because<00:13:37.920><c> the</c><00:13:38.079><c> budget</c><00:13:38.480><c> is</c><00:13:38.639><c> only</c><00:13:38.880><c> seven</c><00:13:39.240><c> days</c><00:13:39.920><c> so</c>

00:13:40.269 --> 00:13:40.279 align:start position:0%
because the budget is only seven days so
 

00:13:40.279 --> 00:13:43.230 align:start position:0%
because the budget is only seven days so
it's<00:13:40.440><c> like</c><00:13:40.639><c> Willie</c><00:13:40.959><c> has</c><00:13:41.160><c> age</c><00:13:41.639><c> hit</c><00:13:41.880><c> eight</c><00:13:42.399><c> hit</c>

00:13:43.230 --> 00:13:43.240 align:start position:0%
it's like Willie has age hit eight hit
 

00:13:43.240 --> 00:13:46.110 align:start position:0%
it's like Willie has age hit eight hit
points<00:13:44.240><c> but</c><00:13:44.639><c> the</c><00:13:44.800><c> adversary</c><00:13:45.440><c> has</c><00:13:45.600><c> only</c><00:13:45.839><c> seven</c>

00:13:46.110 --> 00:13:46.120 align:start position:0%
points but the adversary has only seven
 

00:13:46.120 --> 00:13:48.710 align:start position:0%
points but the adversary has only seven
bullets<00:13:46.839><c> so</c><00:13:47.040><c> the</c><00:13:47.199><c> best</c><00:13:47.399><c> the</c><00:13:47.560><c> adversary</c><00:13:48.040><c> can</c><00:13:48.199><c> do</c>

00:13:48.710 --> 00:13:48.720 align:start position:0%
bullets so the best the adversary can do
 

00:13:48.720 --> 00:13:51.870 align:start position:0%
bullets so the best the adversary can do
is<00:13:49.000><c> spend</c><00:13:49.360><c> his</c><00:13:49.639><c> whole</c><00:13:50.360><c> budget</c><00:13:51.360><c> and</c><00:13:51.519><c> force</c>

00:13:51.870 --> 00:13:51.880 align:start position:0%
is spend his whole budget and force
 

00:13:51.880 --> 00:13:54.310 align:start position:0%
is spend his whole budget and force
Willie<00:13:52.160><c> to</c><00:13:52.320><c> lose</c><00:13:52.680><c> seven</c><00:13:53.120><c> hit</c><00:13:53.320><c> points</c><00:13:53.959><c> and</c><00:13:54.079><c> then</c>

00:13:54.310 --> 00:13:54.320 align:start position:0%
Willie to lose seven hit points and then
 

00:13:54.320 --> 00:13:56.430 align:start position:0%
Willie to lose seven hit points and then
he's<00:13:54.519><c> out</c><00:13:54.680><c> of</c><00:13:54.839><c> budget</c><00:13:55.519><c> and</c><00:13:55.639><c> now</c><00:13:55.839><c> will</c><00:13:56.120><c> is</c><00:13:56.240><c> very</c>

00:13:56.430 --> 00:13:56.440 align:start position:0%
he's out of budget and now will is very
 

00:13:56.440 --> 00:13:58.069 align:start position:0%
he's out of budget and now will is very
angry<00:13:56.800><c> indeed</c><00:13:57.240><c> and</c><00:13:57.320><c> he</c><00:13:57.480><c> going</c><00:13:57.639><c> to</c><00:13:57.800><c> kill</c>

00:13:58.069 --> 00:13:58.079 align:start position:0%
angry indeed and he going to kill
 

00:13:58.079 --> 00:14:00.389 align:start position:0%
angry indeed and he going to kill
everybody<00:13:58.440><c> else</c>

00:14:00.389 --> 00:14:00.399 align:start position:0%
everybody else
 

00:14:00.399 --> 00:14:02.110 align:start position:0%
everybody else
now<00:14:00.560><c> this</c><00:14:00.720><c> may</c><00:14:00.880><c> seem</c><00:14:01.079><c> a</c><00:14:01.199><c> bit</c><00:14:01.440><c> abstract</c><00:14:01.920><c> so</c>

00:14:02.110 --> 00:14:02.120 align:start position:0%
now this may seem a bit abstract so
 

00:14:02.120 --> 00:14:04.509 align:start position:0%
now this may seem a bit abstract so
let's<00:14:02.720><c> get</c><00:14:02.839><c> it</c><00:14:03.000><c> more</c><00:14:03.240><c> concrete</c><00:14:04.000><c> so</c><00:14:04.199><c> this</c><00:14:04.279><c> is</c><00:14:04.360><c> a</c>

00:14:04.509 --> 00:14:04.519 align:start position:0%
let's get it more concrete so this is a
 

00:14:04.519 --> 00:14:06.110 align:start position:0%
let's get it more concrete so this is a
different<00:14:04.800><c> example</c><00:14:05.160><c> the</c><00:14:05.279><c> previous</c><00:14:05.600><c> one</c><00:14:05.880><c> was</c>

00:14:06.110 --> 00:14:06.120 align:start position:0%
different example the previous one was
 

00:14:06.120 --> 00:14:08.389 align:start position:0%
different example the previous one was
with<00:14:06.440><c> eight</c><00:14:06.680><c> hit</c><00:14:06.880><c> points</c><00:14:07.320><c> this</c><00:14:07.440><c> one</c><00:14:07.639><c> is</c><00:14:07.880><c> just</c>

00:14:08.389 --> 00:14:08.399 align:start position:0%
with eight hit points this one is just
 

00:14:08.399 --> 00:14:10.910 align:start position:0%
with eight hit points this one is just
three<00:14:09.399><c> uh</c><00:14:09.519><c> the</c><00:14:09.639><c> optimal</c><00:14:10.079><c> value</c><00:14:10.320><c> is</c><00:14:10.480><c> more</c><00:14:10.720><c> like</c>

00:14:10.910 --> 00:14:10.920 align:start position:0%
three uh the optimal value is more like
 

00:14:10.920 --> 00:14:13.069 align:start position:0%
three uh the optimal value is more like
21<00:14:11.680><c> you</c><00:14:11.800><c> know</c><00:14:12.160><c> but</c><00:14:12.440><c> it's</c><00:14:12.639><c> it's</c><00:14:12.759><c> hard</c><00:14:12.920><c> to</c>

00:14:13.069 --> 00:14:13.079 align:start position:0%
21 you know but it's it's hard to
 

00:14:13.079 --> 00:14:15.150 align:start position:0%
21 you know but it's it's hard to
visualize<00:14:13.639><c> that</c><00:14:13.959><c> so</c><00:14:14.079><c> let's</c><00:14:14.279><c> go</c><00:14:14.399><c> with</c><00:14:14.560><c> three</c>

00:14:15.150 --> 00:14:15.160 align:start position:0%
visualize that so let's go with three
 

00:14:15.160 --> 00:14:17.990 align:start position:0%
visualize that so let's go with three
first<00:14:16.160><c> uh</c><00:14:16.480><c> yeah</c><00:14:16.639><c> so</c><00:14:16.839><c> everybody</c><00:14:17.560><c> everybody's</c>

00:14:17.990 --> 00:14:18.000 align:start position:0%
first uh yeah so everybody everybody's
 

00:14:18.000 --> 00:14:19.749 align:start position:0%
first uh yeah so everybody everybody's
on<00:14:18.160><c> the</c><00:14:18.279><c> same</c><00:14:18.480><c> bucket</c><00:14:18.920><c> in</c><00:14:19.040><c> the</c><00:14:19.160><c> beginning</c>

00:14:19.749 --> 00:14:19.759 align:start position:0%
on the same bucket in the beginning
 

00:14:19.759 --> 00:14:22.509 align:start position:0%
on the same bucket in the beginning
everyone<00:14:20.120><c> has</c><00:14:20.279><c> three</c><00:14:20.560><c> HP</c><00:14:21.399><c> and</c><00:14:21.560><c> the</c><00:14:22.160><c> uh</c><00:14:22.320><c> white</c>

00:14:22.509 --> 00:14:22.519 align:start position:0%
everyone has three HP and the uh white
 

00:14:22.519 --> 00:14:26.069 align:start position:0%
everyone has three HP and the uh white
arrows<00:14:23.279><c> point</c><00:14:23.720><c> to</c><00:14:24.000><c> the</c><00:14:24.839><c> matchmaking</c><00:14:25.839><c> so</c>

00:14:26.069 --> 00:14:26.079 align:start position:0%
arrows point to the matchmaking so
 

00:14:26.079 --> 00:14:29.350 align:start position:0%
arrows point to the matchmaking so
Willie<00:14:26.399><c> is</c><00:14:26.519><c> spared</c><00:14:27.040><c> against</c><00:14:27.800><c> red</c>

00:14:29.350 --> 00:14:29.360 align:start position:0%
Willie is spared against red
 

00:14:29.360 --> 00:14:33.230 align:start position:0%
Willie is spared against red
and<00:14:29.560><c> green</c><00:14:29.880><c> is</c><00:14:30.000><c> spared</c><00:14:30.519><c> against</c><00:14:31.519><c> gray</c><00:14:32.519><c> so</c><00:14:33.000><c> red</c>

00:14:33.230 --> 00:14:33.240 align:start position:0%
and green is spared against gray so red
 

00:14:33.240 --> 00:14:36.310 align:start position:0%
and green is spared against gray so red
and<00:14:33.399><c> green</c><00:14:33.720><c> lose</c><00:14:34.160><c> so</c><00:14:34.399><c> they're</c><00:14:35.120><c> demoted</c><00:14:36.120><c> then</c>

00:14:36.310 --> 00:14:36.320 align:start position:0%
and green lose so they're demoted then
 

00:14:36.320 --> 00:14:38.389 align:start position:0%
and green lose so they're demoted then
we<00:14:36.560><c> rematch</c><00:14:36.959><c> again</c><00:14:37.360><c> now</c><00:14:37.600><c> this</c><00:14:37.759><c> time</c><00:14:37.959><c> Willie</c><00:14:38.240><c> is</c>

00:14:38.389 --> 00:14:38.399 align:start position:0%
we rematch again now this time Willie is
 

00:14:38.399 --> 00:14:42.030 align:start position:0%
we rematch again now this time Willie is
against<00:14:38.720><c> gray</c><00:14:39.440><c> red</c><00:14:39.720><c> is</c><00:14:39.959><c> against</c><00:14:40.800><c> Green</c><00:14:41.800><c> so</c>

00:14:42.030 --> 00:14:42.040 align:start position:0%
against gray red is against Green so
 

00:14:42.040 --> 00:14:44.710 align:start position:0%
against gray red is against Green so
green<00:14:42.360><c> loses</c><00:14:43.240><c> gray</c><00:14:43.560><c> loses</c><00:14:44.240><c> and</c><00:14:44.360><c> he</c><00:14:44.480><c> keeps</c>

00:14:44.710 --> 00:14:44.720 align:start position:0%
green loses gray loses and he keeps
 

00:14:44.720 --> 00:14:46.949 align:start position:0%
green loses gray loses and he keeps
going<00:14:44.920><c> like</c><00:14:45.160><c> this</c><00:14:45.320><c> you</c><00:14:45.399><c> know</c><00:14:45.600><c> this</c><00:14:45.839><c> logic</c><00:14:46.839><c> uh</c>

00:14:46.949 --> 00:14:46.959 align:start position:0%
going like this you know this logic uh
 

00:14:46.959 --> 00:14:50.829 align:start position:0%
going like this you know this logic uh
of<00:14:47.199><c> bearing</c><00:14:48.000><c> whoever</c><00:14:48.360><c> loses</c><00:14:49.079><c> gets</c><00:14:49.720><c> demoted</c><00:14:50.720><c> uh</c>

00:14:50.829 --> 00:14:50.839 align:start position:0%
of bearing whoever loses gets demoted uh
 

00:14:50.839 --> 00:14:53.990 align:start position:0%
of bearing whoever loses gets demoted uh
and<00:14:51.320><c> eventually</c><00:14:52.320><c> Willie</c><00:14:52.639><c> wins</c><00:14:53.000><c> you</c><00:14:53.160><c> know</c><00:14:53.360><c> he</c>

00:14:53.990 --> 00:14:54.000 align:start position:0%
and eventually Willie wins you know he
 

00:14:54.000 --> 00:14:54.910 align:start position:0%
and eventually Willie wins you know he
kills

00:14:54.910 --> 00:14:54.920 align:start position:0%
kills
 

00:14:54.920 --> 00:14:57.310 align:start position:0%
kills
everyone<00:14:55.920><c> uh</c><00:14:56.199><c> but</c><00:14:56.320><c> on</c><00:14:56.519><c> this</c><00:14:56.680><c> example</c><00:14:57.040><c> note</c>

00:14:57.310 --> 00:14:57.320 align:start position:0%
everyone uh but on this example note
 

00:14:57.320 --> 00:14:59.189 align:start position:0%
everyone uh but on this example note
that<00:14:57.680><c> we</c><00:14:57.800><c> assume</c><00:14:58.040><c> there's</c><00:14:58.240><c> no</c><00:14:58.440><c> censorship</c><00:14:59.040><c> so</c>

00:14:59.189 --> 00:14:59.199 align:start position:0%
that we assume there's no censorship so
 

00:14:59.199 --> 00:15:01.069 align:start position:0%
that we assume there's no censorship so
will<00:14:59.519><c> didn't</c><00:14:59.720><c> lose</c><00:14:59.959><c> any</c><00:15:00.120><c> hearts</c><00:15:00.759><c> he</c><00:15:00.920><c> could</c>

00:15:01.069 --> 00:15:01.079 align:start position:0%
will didn't lose any hearts he could
 

00:15:01.079 --> 00:15:03.389 align:start position:0%
will didn't lose any hearts he could
have<00:15:01.199><c> lost</c><00:15:01.720><c> Hearts</c><00:15:02.480><c> uh</c><00:15:02.600><c> but</c><00:15:02.720><c> it's</c><00:15:02.959><c> you</c><00:15:03.079><c> know</c><00:15:03.240><c> it</c>

00:15:03.389 --> 00:15:03.399 align:start position:0%
have lost Hearts uh but it's you know it
 

00:15:03.399 --> 00:15:05.870 align:start position:0%
have lost Hearts uh but it's you know it
would<00:15:03.600><c> take</c><00:15:04.040><c> more</c><00:15:05.040><c> images</c><00:15:05.360><c> to</c><00:15:05.480><c> do</c><00:15:05.639><c> that</c><00:15:05.800><c> so</c>

00:15:05.870 --> 00:15:05.880 align:start position:0%
would take more images to do that so
 

00:15:05.880 --> 00:15:07.110 align:start position:0%
would take more images to do that so
we're<00:15:06.120><c> just</c><00:15:06.279><c> assuming</c><00:15:06.720><c> that</c><00:15:06.839><c> you</c><00:15:06.920><c> know</c>

00:15:07.110 --> 00:15:07.120 align:start position:0%
we're just assuming that you know
 

00:15:07.120 --> 00:15:09.189 align:start position:0%
we're just assuming that you know
there's<00:15:07.279><c> no</c><00:15:07.480><c> censorship</c><00:15:08.440><c> for</c><00:15:08.680><c> this</c><00:15:08.839><c> figure</c>

00:15:09.189 --> 00:15:09.199 align:start position:0%
there's no censorship for this figure
 

00:15:09.199 --> 00:15:10.829 align:start position:0%
there's no censorship for this figure
but<00:15:09.360><c> there</c><00:15:09.519><c> could</c><00:15:09.720><c> be</c><00:15:10.160><c> uh</c><00:15:10.240><c> so</c><00:15:10.440><c> Willie</c><00:15:10.680><c> could</c>

00:15:10.829 --> 00:15:10.839 align:start position:0%
but there could be uh so Willie could
 

00:15:10.839 --> 00:15:14.829 align:start position:0%
but there could be uh so Willie could
lose<00:15:11.079><c> two</c><00:15:11.320><c> rounds</c><00:15:12.040><c> but</c><00:15:12.199><c> not</c><00:15:12.360><c> the</c><00:15:12.519><c> third</c>

00:15:14.829 --> 00:15:14.839 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:15:14.839 --> 00:15:17.990 align:start position:0%
 
one<00:15:15.839><c> but</c><00:15:16.120><c> we</c><00:15:16.320><c> didn't</c><00:15:16.880><c> talk</c><00:15:17.160><c> about</c><00:15:17.560><c> how</c><00:15:17.800><c> this</c>

00:15:17.990 --> 00:15:18.000 align:start position:0%
one but we didn't talk about how this
 

00:15:18.000 --> 00:15:21.030 align:start position:0%
one but we didn't talk about how this
matchmaking<00:15:18.600><c> is</c><00:15:19.120><c> done</c><00:15:20.120><c> uh</c><00:15:20.320><c> and</c><00:15:20.480><c> this</c><00:15:20.600><c> is</c><00:15:20.839><c> quite</c>

00:15:21.030 --> 00:15:21.040 align:start position:0%
matchmaking is done uh and this is quite
 

00:15:21.040 --> 00:15:22.629 align:start position:0%
matchmaking is done uh and this is quite
delicate<00:15:21.440><c> in</c><00:15:21.560><c> fact</c><00:15:21.759><c> this</c><00:15:21.880><c> is</c><00:15:22.040><c> at</c><00:15:22.160><c> the</c><00:15:22.279><c> heart</c><00:15:22.440><c> of</c>

00:15:22.629 --> 00:15:22.639 align:start position:0%
delicate in fact this is at the heart of
 

00:15:22.639 --> 00:15:24.670 align:start position:0%
delicate in fact this is at the heart of
Dave<00:15:22.880><c> the</c><00:15:23.079><c> matchmaking</c><00:15:24.040><c> we</c><00:15:24.199><c> can't</c><00:15:24.399><c> do</c><00:15:24.519><c> it</c>

00:15:24.670 --> 00:15:24.680 align:start position:0%
Dave the matchmaking we can't do it
 

00:15:24.680 --> 00:15:27.710 align:start position:0%
Dave the matchmaking we can't do it
randomly<00:15:25.399><c> we</c><00:15:25.519><c> cannot</c><00:15:25.920><c> do</c><00:15:26.240><c> this</c><00:15:27.240><c> uh</c>

00:15:27.710 --> 00:15:27.720 align:start position:0%
randomly we cannot do this uh
 

00:15:27.720 --> 00:15:29.509 align:start position:0%
randomly we cannot do this uh
adversarially<00:15:28.720><c> bus</c>

00:15:29.509 --> 00:15:29.519 align:start position:0%
adversarially bus
 

00:15:29.519 --> 00:15:31.150 align:start position:0%
adversarially bus
you<00:15:29.680><c> know</c><00:15:29.959><c> it</c><00:15:30.160><c> has</c><00:15:30.279><c> to</c><00:15:30.399><c> be</c><00:15:30.519><c> done</c><00:15:30.639><c> in</c><00:15:30.759><c> a</c><00:15:30.920><c> very</c>

00:15:31.150 --> 00:15:31.160 align:start position:0%
you know it has to be done in a very
 

00:15:31.160 --> 00:15:33.590 align:start position:0%
you know it has to be done in a very
specific<00:15:31.600><c> way</c><00:15:32.160><c> which</c><00:15:32.319><c> is</c><00:15:32.560><c> we</c><00:15:32.680><c> need</c><00:15:32.880><c> to</c><00:15:33.000><c> do</c>

00:15:33.590 --> 00:15:33.600 align:start position:0%
specific way which is we need to do
 

00:15:33.600 --> 00:15:36.470 align:start position:0%
specific way which is we need to do
matchmaking<00:15:34.600><c> by</c><00:15:34.959><c> hit</c><00:15:35.240><c> point</c><00:15:35.759><c> so</c><00:15:35.959><c> we</c><00:15:36.079><c> want</c><00:15:36.279><c> to</c>

00:15:36.470 --> 00:15:36.480 align:start position:0%
matchmaking by hit point so we want to
 

00:15:36.480 --> 00:15:38.269 align:start position:0%
matchmaking by hit point so we want to
match<00:15:36.720><c> the</c><00:15:36.880><c> same</c><00:15:37.160><c> hit</c><00:15:37.360><c> point</c><00:15:37.560><c> with</c><00:15:37.800><c> same</c><00:15:38.040><c> hit</c>

00:15:38.269 --> 00:15:38.279 align:start position:0%
match the same hit point with same hit
 

00:15:38.279 --> 00:15:41.150 align:start position:0%
match the same hit point with same hit
point<00:15:38.920><c> or</c><00:15:39.199><c> at</c><00:15:39.360><c> least</c><00:15:39.720><c> as</c><00:15:39.880><c> close</c><00:15:40.199><c> as</c><00:15:40.399><c> possible</c>

00:15:41.150 --> 00:15:41.160 align:start position:0%
point or at least as close as possible
 

00:15:41.160 --> 00:15:42.550 align:start position:0%
point or at least as close as possible
so<00:15:41.319><c> looking</c><00:15:41.639><c> back</c><00:15:41.759><c> it's</c><00:15:41.920><c> the</c><00:15:42.040><c> same</c><00:15:42.199><c> image</c><00:15:42.480><c> you</c>

00:15:42.550 --> 00:15:42.560 align:start position:0%
so looking back it's the same image you
 

00:15:42.560 --> 00:15:44.949 align:start position:0%
so looking back it's the same image you
know<00:15:42.759><c> we</c><00:15:42.880><c> did</c><00:15:43.160><c> the</c><00:15:43.360><c> correct</c><00:15:43.759><c> matchmaking</c><00:15:44.720><c> so</c>

00:15:44.949 --> 00:15:44.959 align:start position:0%
know we did the correct matchmaking so
 

00:15:44.959 --> 00:15:47.749 align:start position:0%
know we did the correct matchmaking so
on<00:15:45.120><c> the</c><00:15:45.360><c> second</c><00:15:45.720><c> round</c><00:15:46.360><c> Dave</c><00:15:46.720><c> is</c><00:15:46.920><c> matched</c><00:15:47.519><c> not</c>

00:15:47.749 --> 00:15:47.759 align:start position:0%
on the second round Dave is matched not
 

00:15:47.759 --> 00:15:49.710 align:start position:0%
on the second round Dave is matched not
Dave<00:15:48.000><c> Willie</c><00:15:48.360><c> Willie</c><00:15:48.680><c> is</c><00:15:48.759><c> matched</c><00:15:49.199><c> against</c>

00:15:49.710 --> 00:15:49.720 align:start position:0%
Dave Willie Willie is matched against
 

00:15:49.720 --> 00:15:52.030 align:start position:0%
Dave Willie Willie is matched against
the<00:15:49.880><c> gray</c><00:15:50.160><c> one</c><00:15:50.959><c> he's</c><00:15:51.120><c> not</c><00:15:51.279><c> matched</c><00:15:51.600><c> against</c>

00:15:52.030 --> 00:15:52.040 align:start position:0%
the gray one he's not matched against
 

00:15:52.040 --> 00:15:55.949 align:start position:0%
the gray one he's not matched against
red<00:15:52.319><c> or</c><00:15:52.560><c> green</c><00:15:53.360><c> has</c><00:15:53.480><c> to</c><00:15:53.600><c> be</c><00:15:53.720><c> matched</c><00:15:54.279><c> with</c><00:15:54.959><c> gray</c>

00:15:55.949 --> 00:15:55.959 align:start position:0%
red or green has to be matched with gray
 

00:15:55.959 --> 00:15:57.509 align:start position:0%
red or green has to be matched with gray
third<00:15:56.240><c> round</c><00:15:56.480><c> is</c><00:15:56.639><c> not</c><00:15:56.839><c> possible</c><00:15:57.120><c> to</c><00:15:57.240><c> do</c><00:15:57.360><c> a</c>

00:15:57.509 --> 00:15:57.519 align:start position:0%
third round is not possible to do a
 

00:15:57.519 --> 00:16:00.389 align:start position:0%
third round is not possible to do a
perfect<00:15:58.079><c> pairing</c><00:15:58.759><c> uh</c><00:15:59.000><c> so</c><00:15:59.160><c> we</c><00:15:59.279><c> do</c><00:15:59.440><c> our</c><00:15:59.680><c> best</c><00:16:00.240><c> and</c>

00:16:00.389 --> 00:16:00.399 align:start position:0%
perfect pairing uh so we do our best and
 

00:16:00.399 --> 00:16:03.069 align:start position:0%
perfect pairing uh so we do our best and
our<00:16:00.600><c> best</c><00:16:00.839><c> would</c><00:16:01.000><c> be</c><00:16:01.160><c> either</c><00:16:01.399><c> gray</c><00:16:01.680><c> or</c><00:16:01.959><c> red</c><00:16:02.959><c> and</c>

00:16:03.069 --> 00:16:03.079 align:start position:0%
our best would be either gray or red and
 

00:16:03.079 --> 00:16:05.550 align:start position:0%
our best would be either gray or red and
so<00:16:03.279><c> on</c><00:16:03.480><c> so</c><00:16:03.759><c> like</c><00:16:04.079><c> abstractly</c><00:16:04.639><c> it's</c><00:16:04.839><c> like</c><00:16:05.160><c> as</c><00:16:05.319><c> if</c>

00:16:05.550 --> 00:16:05.560 align:start position:0%
so on so like abstractly it's like as if
 

00:16:05.560 --> 00:16:09.430 align:start position:0%
so on so like abstractly it's like as if
we<00:16:06.199><c> sorted</c><00:16:07.199><c> every</c><00:16:07.560><c> Claim</c><00:16:08.079><c> by</c><00:16:08.319><c> hit</c><00:16:08.600><c> point</c>

00:16:09.430 --> 00:16:09.440 align:start position:0%
we sorted every Claim by hit point
 

00:16:09.440 --> 00:16:12.069 align:start position:0%
we sorted every Claim by hit point
highest<00:16:09.759><c> to</c><00:16:09.959><c> lowest</c><00:16:10.880><c> and</c><00:16:11.000><c> then</c><00:16:11.199><c> we</c><00:16:11.399><c> match</c><00:16:11.720><c> them</c>

00:16:12.069 --> 00:16:12.079 align:start position:0%
highest to lowest and then we match them
 

00:16:12.079 --> 00:16:14.629 align:start position:0%
highest to lowest and then we match them
left<00:16:12.600><c> to</c>

00:16:14.629 --> 00:16:14.639 align:start position:0%
left to
 

00:16:14.639 --> 00:16:17.069 align:start position:0%
left to
right<00:16:15.639><c> yeah</c><00:16:15.759><c> and</c><00:16:15.920><c> when</c><00:16:16.040><c> we</c><00:16:16.160><c> do</c><00:16:16.399><c> that</c><00:16:16.880><c> we</c>

00:16:17.069 --> 00:16:17.079 align:start position:0%
right yeah and when we do that we
 

00:16:17.079 --> 00:16:18.629 align:start position:0%
right yeah and when we do that we
actually<00:16:17.360><c> get</c><00:16:17.600><c> exactly</c><00:16:17.959><c> what</c><00:16:18.120><c> we</c><00:16:18.240><c> wanted</c><00:16:18.519><c> you</c>

00:16:18.629 --> 00:16:18.639 align:start position:0%
actually get exactly what we wanted you
 

00:16:18.639 --> 00:16:20.870 align:start position:0%
actually get exactly what we wanted you
know<00:16:18.800><c> if</c><00:16:18.920><c> it</c><00:16:19.079><c> was</c><00:16:19.319><c> random</c><00:16:20.319><c> uh</c><00:16:20.440><c> there</c><00:16:20.560><c> will</c><00:16:20.720><c> be</c>

00:16:20.870 --> 00:16:20.880 align:start position:0%
know if it was random uh there will be
 

00:16:20.880 --> 00:16:25.350 align:start position:0%
know if it was random uh there will be
no<00:16:21.560><c> um</c><00:16:22.480><c> uh</c><00:16:22.600><c> improvements</c><00:16:23.319><c> over</c><00:16:23.920><c> PRT</c><00:16:24.920><c> but</c><00:16:25.120><c> if</c><00:16:25.240><c> we</c>

00:16:25.350 --> 00:16:25.360 align:start position:0%
no um uh improvements over PRT but if we
 

00:16:25.360 --> 00:16:27.870 align:start position:0%
no um uh improvements over PRT but if we
do<00:16:25.519><c> the</c><00:16:25.639><c> rematching</c><00:16:26.600><c> with</c><00:16:26.800><c> similar</c><00:16:27.160><c> HP</c><00:16:27.720><c> we</c>

00:16:27.870 --> 00:16:27.880 align:start position:0%
do the rematching with similar HP we
 

00:16:27.880 --> 00:16:29.910 align:start position:0%
do the rematching with similar HP we
actually<00:16:28.160><c> dilute</c><00:16:28.639><c> the</c><00:16:28.720><c> set</c><00:16:28.920><c> 7</c><00:16:29.199><c> Days</c><00:16:29.519><c> across</c>

00:16:29.910 --> 00:16:29.920 align:start position:0%
actually dilute the set 7 Days across
 

00:16:29.920 --> 00:16:31.870 align:start position:0%
actually dilute the set 7 Days across
the<00:16:30.040><c> whole</c><00:16:30.279><c> dispute</c><00:16:30.880><c> we</c><00:16:31.000><c> get</c><00:16:31.240><c> exactly</c><00:16:31.600><c> what</c><00:16:31.759><c> we</c>

00:16:31.870 --> 00:16:31.880 align:start position:0%
the whole dispute we get exactly what we
 

00:16:31.880 --> 00:16:33.710 align:start position:0%
the whole dispute we get exactly what we
wanted<00:16:32.519><c> there's</c><00:16:32.759><c> some</c><00:16:32.959><c> constants</c><00:16:33.440><c> there</c><00:16:33.600><c> you</c>

00:16:33.710 --> 00:16:33.720 align:start position:0%
wanted there's some constants there you
 

00:16:33.720 --> 00:16:35.189 align:start position:0%
wanted there's some constants there you
know<00:16:33.880><c> that's</c><00:16:34.040><c> why</c><00:16:34.160><c> I</c><00:16:34.279><c> said</c><00:16:34.519><c> proportional</c><00:16:35.040><c> it's</c>

00:16:35.189 --> 00:16:35.199 align:start position:0%
know that's why I said proportional it's
 

00:16:35.199 --> 00:16:38.230 align:start position:0%
know that's why I said proportional it's
not<00:16:35.440><c> exactly</c><00:16:35.959><c> that</c><00:16:36.680><c> but</c><00:16:36.959><c> the</c><00:16:37.120><c> idea</c><00:16:37.639><c> is</c><00:16:37.880><c> really</c>

00:16:38.230 --> 00:16:38.240 align:start position:0%
not exactly that but the idea is really
 

00:16:38.240 --> 00:16:41.470 align:start position:0%
not exactly that but the idea is really
we<00:16:38.360><c> are</c><00:16:38.759><c> amortizing</c><00:16:39.480><c> seven</c><00:16:39.880><c> days</c><00:16:40.399><c> across</c><00:16:41.360><c> the</c>

00:16:41.470 --> 00:16:41.480 align:start position:0%
we are amortizing seven days across the
 

00:16:41.480 --> 00:16:43.870 align:start position:0%
we are amortizing seven days across the
whole<00:16:41.759><c> dispute</c><00:16:42.560><c> and</c><00:16:42.680><c> we're</c><00:16:42.920><c> only</c><00:16:43.240><c> playing</c>

00:16:43.870 --> 00:16:43.880 align:start position:0%
whole dispute and we're only playing
 

00:16:43.880 --> 00:16:46.430 align:start position:0%
whole dispute and we're only playing
paying<00:16:44.399><c> one</c><00:16:44.639><c> day</c><00:16:45.199><c> in</c><00:16:45.360><c> that</c><00:16:45.519><c> 7-Day</c><00:16:46.000><c> example</c><00:16:46.319><c> you</c>

00:16:46.430 --> 00:16:46.440 align:start position:0%
paying one day in that 7-Day example you
 

00:16:46.440 --> 00:16:48.949 align:start position:0%
paying one day in that 7-Day example you
know<00:16:46.560><c> that</c><00:16:46.680><c> I</c><00:16:46.800><c> gave</c><00:16:47.279><c> earlier</c><00:16:48.279><c> uh</c><00:16:48.600><c> times</c>

00:16:48.949 --> 00:16:48.959 align:start position:0%
know that I gave earlier uh times
 

00:16:48.959 --> 00:16:50.350 align:start position:0%
know that I gave earlier uh times
logarithmic<00:16:49.600><c> of</c>

00:16:50.350 --> 00:16:50.360 align:start position:0%
logarithmic of
 

00:16:50.360 --> 00:16:53.269 align:start position:0%
logarithmic of
sios<00:16:51.360><c> uh</c><00:16:51.480><c> I</c><00:16:51.519><c> mean</c><00:16:51.680><c> the</c><00:16:51.800><c> real</c><00:16:52.160><c> values</c><00:16:53.000><c> uh</c><00:16:53.120><c> is</c>

00:16:53.269 --> 00:16:53.279 align:start position:0%
sios uh I mean the real values uh is
 

00:16:53.279 --> 00:16:54.710 align:start position:0%
sios uh I mean the real values uh is
actually<00:16:53.480><c> more</c><00:16:53.759><c> like</c><00:16:53.920><c> 10</c><00:16:54.160><c> hours</c><00:16:54.480><c> you</c><00:16:54.600><c> know</c>

00:16:54.710 --> 00:16:54.720 align:start position:0%
actually more like 10 hours you know
 

00:16:54.720 --> 00:16:56.910 align:start position:0%
actually more like 10 hours you know
then<00:16:54.880><c> there's</c><00:16:55.040><c> a</c><00:16:55.240><c> constant</c><00:16:56.079><c> we</c><00:16:56.240><c> go</c><00:16:56.440><c> on</c><00:16:56.639><c> all</c><00:16:56.800><c> of</c>

00:16:56.910 --> 00:16:56.920 align:start position:0%
then there's a constant we go on all of
 

00:16:56.920 --> 00:16:58.230 align:start position:0%
then there's a constant we go on all of
that<00:16:57.079><c> with</c><00:16:57.199><c> a</c><00:16:57.319><c> lot</c><00:16:57.440><c> more</c><00:16:57.600><c> nuance</c><00:16:58.079><c> and</c>

00:16:58.230 --> 00:16:58.240 align:start position:0%
that with a lot more nuance and
 

00:16:58.240 --> 00:16:59.829 align:start position:0%
that with a lot more nuance and
discussions<00:16:58.639><c> on</c><00:16:58.920><c> the</c><00:16:59.040><c> paper</c><00:16:59.279><c> so</c><00:16:59.399><c> we</c><00:16:59.519><c> can</c><00:16:59.680><c> check</c>

00:16:59.829 --> 00:16:59.839 align:start position:0%
discussions on the paper so we can check
 

00:16:59.839 --> 00:17:00.590 align:start position:0%
discussions on the paper so we can check
it

00:17:00.590 --> 00:17:00.600 align:start position:0%
it
 

00:17:00.600 --> 00:17:02.949 align:start position:0%
it
out<00:17:01.600><c> uh</c><00:17:01.959><c> yeah</c><00:17:02.079><c> so</c><00:17:02.279><c> this</c><00:17:02.399><c> finishes</c><00:17:02.759><c> the</c>

00:17:02.949 --> 00:17:02.959 align:start position:0%
out uh yeah so this finishes the
 

00:17:02.959 --> 00:17:04.990 align:start position:0%
out uh yeah so this finishes the
description<00:17:03.399><c> of</c><00:17:03.560><c> Dave</c><00:17:03.880><c> so</c><00:17:04.000><c> it's</c><00:17:04.079><c> a</c><00:17:04.199><c> repage</c>

00:17:04.990 --> 00:17:05.000 align:start position:0%
description of Dave so it's a repage
 

00:17:05.000 --> 00:17:07.309 align:start position:0%
description of Dave so it's a repage
tournament<00:17:06.000><c> where</c><00:17:06.199><c> we</c><00:17:06.360><c> do</c><00:17:06.520><c> the</c><00:17:06.679><c> match</c><00:17:06.959><c> making</c>

00:17:07.309 --> 00:17:07.319 align:start position:0%
tournament where we do the match making
 

00:17:07.319 --> 00:17:10.110 align:start position:0%
tournament where we do the match making
with<00:17:07.559><c> similar</c><00:17:08.039><c> HP</c><00:17:09.039><c> and</c><00:17:09.199><c> when</c><00:17:09.319><c> we</c><00:17:09.480><c> do</c><00:17:09.679><c> that</c><00:17:09.919><c> we</c>

00:17:10.110 --> 00:17:10.120 align:start position:0%
with similar HP and when we do that we
 

00:17:10.120 --> 00:17:12.750 align:start position:0%
with similar HP and when we do that we
amortise<00:17:10.640><c> the</c><00:17:10.799><c> seven</c><00:17:11.079><c> days</c><00:17:11.760><c> across</c><00:17:12.319><c> the</c><00:17:12.439><c> whole</c>

00:17:12.750 --> 00:17:12.760 align:start position:0%
amortise the seven days across the whole
 

00:17:12.760 --> 00:17:15.829 align:start position:0%
amortise the seven days across the whole
dispute<00:17:13.679><c> instead</c><00:17:14.000><c> of</c><00:17:14.199><c> over</c><00:17:14.520><c> a</c><00:17:14.679><c> single</c>

00:17:15.829 --> 00:17:15.839 align:start position:0%
dispute instead of over a single
 

00:17:15.839 --> 00:17:18.870 align:start position:0%
dispute instead of over a single
round<00:17:16.839><c> uh</c><00:17:16.959><c> so</c><00:17:17.319><c> concluding</c><00:17:17.959><c> you</c><00:17:18.120><c> can</c><00:17:18.280><c> be</c><00:17:18.439><c> with</c>

00:17:18.870 --> 00:17:18.880 align:start position:0%
round uh so concluding you can be with
 

00:17:18.880 --> 00:17:20.870 align:start position:0%
round uh so concluding you can be with
you<00:17:19.000><c> only</c><00:17:19.160><c> need</c><00:17:19.360><c> a</c><00:17:19.520><c> laptop</c><00:17:20.079><c> and</c><00:17:20.280><c> about</c><00:17:20.520><c> a</c><00:17:20.640><c> three</c>

00:17:20.870 --> 00:17:20.880 align:start position:0%
you only need a laptop and about a three
 

00:17:20.880 --> 00:17:24.549 align:start position:0%
you only need a laptop and about a three
e<00:17:21.160><c> collat</c><00:17:21.600><c> room</c><00:17:22.559><c> you</c><00:17:22.679><c> can</c><00:17:22.919><c> defeat</c><00:17:23.559><c> anyone</c>

00:17:24.549 --> 00:17:24.559 align:start position:0%
e collat room you can defeat anyone
 

00:17:24.559 --> 00:17:25.870 align:start position:0%
e collat room you can defeat anyone
because<00:17:24.839><c> you</c><00:17:25.000><c> have</c><00:17:25.160><c> this</c><00:17:25.360><c> exponential</c>

00:17:25.870 --> 00:17:25.880 align:start position:0%
because you have this exponential
 

00:17:25.880 --> 00:17:28.630 align:start position:0%
because you have this exponential
Advantage<00:17:26.760><c> so</c><00:17:27.000><c> this</c><00:17:27.199><c> means</c><00:17:27.640><c> that</c><00:17:28.000><c> a</c><00:17:28.160><c> rollup</c>

00:17:28.630 --> 00:17:28.640 align:start position:0%
Advantage so this means that a rollup
 

00:17:28.640 --> 00:17:32.070 align:start position:0%
Advantage so this means that a rollup
that<00:17:28.919><c> uses</c><00:17:29.280><c> Dave</c><00:17:30.039><c> inherits</c><00:17:30.559><c> the</c><00:17:30.760><c> security</c><00:17:31.200><c> of</c>

00:17:32.070 --> 00:17:32.080 align:start position:0%
that uses Dave inherits the security of
 

00:17:32.080 --> 00:17:36.549 align:start position:0%
that uses Dave inherits the security of
L1<00:17:33.080><c> and</c><00:17:33.640><c> for</c><00:17:33.919><c> any</c><00:17:34.200><c> realistic</c><00:17:34.760><c> Cil</c><00:17:35.559><c> attacks</c>

00:17:36.549 --> 00:17:36.559 align:start position:0%
L1 and for any realistic Cil attacks
 

00:17:36.559 --> 00:17:38.870 align:start position:0%
L1 and for any realistic Cil attacks
it's<00:17:36.760><c> going</c><00:17:36.919><c> to</c><00:17:37.120><c> take</c><00:17:37.720><c> no</c><00:17:37.960><c> more</c><00:17:38.200><c> than</c><00:17:38.559><c> four</c>

00:17:38.870 --> 00:17:38.880 align:start position:0%
it's going to take no more than four
 

00:17:38.880 --> 00:17:42.029 align:start position:0%
it's going to take no more than four
weeks<00:17:39.640><c> it's</c><00:17:39.799><c> going</c><00:17:39.919><c> to</c><00:17:40.000><c> be</c><00:17:40.240><c> within</c><00:17:40.640><c> four</c><00:17:41.039><c> weeks</c>

00:17:42.029 --> 00:17:42.039 align:start position:0%
weeks it's going to be within four weeks
 

00:17:42.039 --> 00:17:43.990 align:start position:0%
weeks it's going to be within four weeks
and<00:17:42.240><c> thus</c><00:17:42.480><c> Dave</c><00:17:42.799><c> triumphed</c><00:17:43.280><c> over</c><00:17:43.440><c> the</c><00:17:43.600><c> sibbles</c>

00:17:43.990 --> 00:17:44.000 align:start position:0%
and thus Dave triumphed over the sibbles
 

00:17:44.000 --> 00:17:46.350 align:start position:0%
and thus Dave triumphed over the sibbles
with<00:17:44.120><c> a</c><00:17:44.240><c> laptop</c><00:17:44.640><c> and</c><00:17:44.799><c> a</c><00:17:44.960><c> small</c><00:17:45.160><c> collector</c><00:17:46.160><c> but</c>

00:17:46.350 --> 00:17:46.360 align:start position:0%
with a laptop and a small collector but
 

00:17:46.360 --> 00:17:48.510 align:start position:0%
with a laptop and a small collector but
Dave<00:17:46.600><c> had</c><00:17:46.720><c> no</c><00:17:46.880><c> supercomputers</c><00:17:47.559><c> on</c><00:17:47.760><c> his</c>

00:17:48.510 --> 00:17:48.520 align:start position:0%
Dave had no supercomputers on his
 

00:17:48.520 --> 00:17:51.510 align:start position:0%
Dave had no supercomputers on his
hands<00:17:49.520><c> and</c><00:17:49.679><c> we</c><00:17:49.880><c> get</c><00:17:50.360><c> those</c><00:17:50.640><c> results</c><00:17:51.320><c> yeah</c>

00:17:51.510 --> 00:17:51.520 align:start position:0%
hands and we get those results yeah
 

00:17:51.520 --> 00:17:53.549 align:start position:0%
hands and we get those results yeah
that's<00:17:51.640><c> all</c><00:17:51.799><c> I</c><00:17:51.919><c> had</c><00:17:52.039><c> to</c><00:17:52.320><c> present</c><00:17:52.559><c> to</c><00:17:52.679><c> you</c><00:17:52.799><c> today</c>

00:17:53.549 --> 00:17:53.559 align:start position:0%
that's all I had to present to you today
 

00:17:53.559 --> 00:17:55.500 align:start position:0%
that's all I had to present to you today
thank<00:17:53.679><c> you</c><00:17:53.840><c> very</c><00:17:54.000><c> much</c><00:17:54.160><c> for</c><00:17:54.360><c> coming</c>

00:17:55.500 --> 00:17:55.510 align:start position:0%
thank you very much for coming
 

00:17:55.510 --> 00:18:06.270 align:start position:0%
thank you very much for coming
[Applause]

00:18:06.270 --> 00:18:06.280 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:18:06.280 --> 00:18:09.310 align:start position:0%
 
great<00:18:06.520><c> talk</c><00:18:07.039><c> uh</c><00:18:07.200><c> love</c><00:18:07.400><c> the</c><00:18:07.480><c> name</c><00:18:07.880><c> Dave</c><00:18:08.880><c> um</c>

00:18:09.310 --> 00:18:09.320 align:start position:0%
great talk uh love the name Dave um
 

00:18:09.320 --> 00:18:11.270 align:start position:0%
great talk uh love the name Dave um
thank<00:18:09.480><c> you</c><00:18:10.120><c> it's</c><00:18:10.320><c> got</c><00:18:10.440><c> a</c><00:18:10.520><c> few</c><00:18:10.720><c> few</c><00:18:10.919><c> Q&amp;A</c>

00:18:11.270 --> 00:18:11.280 align:start position:0%
thank you it's got a few few Q&amp;A
 

00:18:11.280 --> 00:18:12.470 align:start position:0%
thank you it's got a few few Q&amp;A
questions<00:18:11.559><c> you</c><00:18:11.640><c> can</c><00:18:11.760><c> still</c><00:18:11.960><c> add</c><00:18:12.159><c> some</c><00:18:12.280><c> of</c><00:18:12.360><c> the</c>

00:18:12.470 --> 00:18:12.480 align:start position:0%
questions you can still add some of the
 

00:18:12.480 --> 00:18:14.149 align:start position:0%
questions you can still add some of the
questions<00:18:13.159><c> um</c><00:18:13.400><c> while</c><00:18:13.559><c> we're</c><00:18:13.799><c> going</c><00:18:14.000><c> through</c>

00:18:14.149 --> 00:18:14.159 align:start position:0%
questions um while we're going through
 

00:18:14.159 --> 00:18:16.070 align:start position:0%
questions um while we're going through
some<00:18:14.280><c> of</c><00:18:14.400><c> these</c><00:18:14.520><c> and</c><00:18:14.640><c> up</c><00:18:14.880><c> vote</c><00:18:15.080><c> them</c><00:18:15.840><c> uh</c><00:18:15.960><c> but</c>

00:18:16.070 --> 00:18:16.080 align:start position:0%
some of these and up vote them uh but
 

00:18:16.080 --> 00:18:17.669 align:start position:0%
some of these and up vote them uh but
the<00:18:16.200><c> first</c><00:18:16.440><c> question</c><00:18:16.760><c> is</c><00:18:17.000><c> is</c><00:18:17.080><c> a</c><00:18:17.280><c> one</c><00:18:17.440><c> that</c><00:18:17.559><c> I've</c>

00:18:17.669 --> 00:18:17.679 align:start position:0%
the first question is is a one that I've
 

00:18:17.679 --> 00:18:19.549 align:start position:0%
the first question is is a one that I've
been<00:18:17.799><c> thinking</c><00:18:18.120><c> too</c><00:18:18.919><c> um</c><00:18:19.120><c> what</c><00:18:19.240><c> if</c><00:18:19.360><c> there's</c>

00:18:19.549 --> 00:18:19.559 align:start position:0%
been thinking too um what if there's
 

00:18:19.559 --> 00:18:21.630 align:start position:0%
been thinking too um what if there's
multiple<00:18:20.039><c> Willies</c><00:18:20.480><c> defending</c><00:18:21.280><c> won't</c><00:18:21.520><c> they</c>

00:18:21.630 --> 00:18:21.640 align:start position:0%
multiple Willies defending won't they
 

00:18:21.640 --> 00:18:23.149 align:start position:0%
multiple Willies defending won't they
eliminate<00:18:22.080><c> each</c><00:18:22.200><c> other</c><00:18:22.600><c> yeah</c><00:18:22.799><c> so</c><00:18:22.919><c> that's</c><00:18:23.039><c> a</c>

00:18:23.149 --> 00:18:23.159 align:start position:0%
eliminate each other yeah so that's a
 

00:18:23.159 --> 00:18:25.549 align:start position:0%
eliminate each other yeah so that's a
good<00:18:23.400><c> question</c><00:18:23.840><c> uh</c><00:18:23.960><c> when</c><00:18:24.120><c> we</c><00:18:24.320><c> did</c><00:18:24.799><c> the</c>

00:18:25.549 --> 00:18:25.559 align:start position:0%
good question uh when we did the
 

00:18:25.559 --> 00:18:27.110 align:start position:0%
good question uh when we did the
computation<00:18:26.240><c> hash</c><00:18:26.600><c> which</c><00:18:26.720><c> is</c><00:18:26.919><c> that</c>

00:18:27.110 --> 00:18:27.120 align:start position:0%
computation hash which is that
 

00:18:27.120 --> 00:18:29.149 align:start position:0%
computation hash which is that
commitment<00:18:27.960><c> it</c><00:18:28.080><c> means</c><00:18:28.320><c> that</c><00:18:28.799><c> everybody</c>

00:18:29.149 --> 00:18:29.159 align:start position:0%
commitment it means that everybody
 

00:18:29.159 --> 00:18:30.830 align:start position:0%
commitment it means that everybody
that's<00:18:29.440><c> honest</c><00:18:29.880><c> is</c><00:18:30.000><c> going</c><00:18:30.120><c> to</c><00:18:30.240><c> be</c><00:18:30.360><c> on</c><00:18:30.480><c> the</c><00:18:30.600><c> same</c>

00:18:30.830 --> 00:18:30.840 align:start position:0%
that's honest is going to be on the same
 

00:18:30.840 --> 00:18:32.750 align:start position:0%
that's honest is going to be on the same
team<00:18:31.480><c> so</c><00:18:31.640><c> if</c><00:18:31.760><c> there</c><00:18:31.840><c> are</c><00:18:31.960><c> many</c><00:18:32.200><c> Willies</c><00:18:32.640><c> they</c>

00:18:32.750 --> 00:18:32.760 align:start position:0%
team so if there are many Willies they
 

00:18:32.760 --> 00:18:35.710 align:start position:0%
team so if there are many Willies they
will<00:18:33.039><c> fight</c><00:18:33.760><c> together</c><00:18:34.400><c> against</c><00:18:34.760><c> the</c><00:18:34.919><c> sibl</c><00:18:35.480><c> not</c>

00:18:35.710 --> 00:18:35.720 align:start position:0%
will fight together against the sibl not
 

00:18:35.720 --> 00:18:37.990 align:start position:0%
will fight together against the sibl not
against<00:18:36.000><c> each</c><00:18:36.200><c> other</c><00:18:36.840><c> because</c><00:18:37.080><c> the</c><00:18:37.280><c> claim</c><00:18:37.840><c> the</c>

00:18:37.990 --> 00:18:38.000 align:start position:0%
against each other because the claim the
 

00:18:38.000 --> 00:18:40.430 align:start position:0%
against each other because the claim the
same<00:18:38.320><c> thing</c><00:18:38.960><c> so</c><00:18:39.159><c> we</c><00:18:39.280><c> have</c><00:18:39.480><c> this</c><00:18:39.720><c> uniqueness</c><00:18:40.280><c> of</c>

00:18:40.430 --> 00:18:40.440 align:start position:0%
same thing so we have this uniqueness of
 

00:18:40.440 --> 00:18:42.430 align:start position:0%
same thing so we have this uniqueness of
claims<00:18:40.880><c> when</c><00:18:41.000><c> we</c><00:18:41.120><c> do</c><00:18:41.280><c> the</c><00:18:41.440><c> computation</c><00:18:42.039><c> hash</c>

00:18:42.430 --> 00:18:42.440 align:start position:0%
claims when we do the computation hash
 

00:18:42.440 --> 00:18:44.870 align:start position:0%
claims when we do the computation hash
and<00:18:42.600><c> we</c><00:18:42.760><c> allow</c><00:18:43.320><c> all</c><00:18:43.520><c> the</c><00:18:43.640><c> honest</c><00:18:44.000><c> validators</c>

00:18:44.870 --> 00:18:44.880 align:start position:0%
and we allow all the honest validators
 

00:18:44.880 --> 00:18:47.870 align:start position:0%
and we allow all the honest validators
to<00:18:45.039><c> join</c><00:18:45.400><c> teams</c><00:18:46.400><c> so</c><00:18:46.679><c> we</c><00:18:46.880><c> consider</c><00:18:47.360><c> this</c><00:18:47.520><c> single</c>

00:18:47.870 --> 00:18:47.880 align:start position:0%
to join teams so we consider this single
 

00:18:47.880 --> 00:18:49.950 align:start position:0%
to join teams so we consider this single
ton<00:18:48.159><c> hero</c><00:18:48.559><c> know</c><00:18:48.679><c> it's</c><00:18:48.919><c> just</c><00:18:49.200><c> Willie</c><00:18:49.640><c> but</c><00:18:49.760><c> in</c>

00:18:49.950 --> 00:18:49.960 align:start position:0%
ton hero know it's just Willie but in
 

00:18:49.960 --> 00:18:51.950 align:start position:0%
ton hero know it's just Willie but in
practice<00:18:50.480><c> there</c><00:18:50.679><c> going</c><00:18:50.760><c> to</c><00:18:50.840><c> be</c><00:18:51.000><c> many</c><00:18:51.200><c> Willies</c>

00:18:51.950 --> 00:18:51.960 align:start position:0%
practice there going to be many Willies
 

00:18:51.960 --> 00:18:53.830 align:start position:0%
practice there going to be many Willies
and<00:18:52.120><c> they</c><00:18:52.320><c> all</c><00:18:52.559><c> fight</c><00:18:53.039><c> together</c><00:18:53.400><c> pushing</c><00:18:53.720><c> in</c>

00:18:53.830 --> 00:18:53.840 align:start position:0%
and they all fight together pushing in
 

00:18:53.840 --> 00:18:55.669 align:start position:0%
and they all fight together pushing in
the<00:18:53.960><c> same</c>

00:18:55.669 --> 00:18:55.679 align:start position:0%
the same
 

00:18:55.679 --> 00:18:58.830 align:start position:0%
the same
direction<00:18:56.679><c> cool</c><00:18:57.600><c> uh</c><00:18:57.799><c> next</c><00:18:58.000><c> question</c><00:18:58.280><c> is</c><00:18:58.440><c> about</c>

00:18:58.830 --> 00:18:58.840 align:start position:0%
direction cool uh next question is about
 

00:18:58.840 --> 00:19:00.710 align:start position:0%
direction cool uh next question is about
your<00:18:58.960><c> censorship</c><00:18:59.440><c> model</c><00:19:00.000><c> is</c><00:19:00.120><c> your</c><00:19:00.280><c> censorship</c>

00:19:00.710 --> 00:19:00.720 align:start position:0%
your censorship model is your censorship
 

00:19:00.720 --> 00:19:02.909 align:start position:0%
your censorship model is your censorship
model<00:19:01.000><c> hard</c><00:19:01.280><c> censorship</c><00:19:02.200><c> and</c><00:19:02.320><c> do</c><00:19:02.520><c> inclusion</c>

00:19:02.909 --> 00:19:02.919 align:start position:0%
model hard censorship and do inclusion
 

00:19:02.919 --> 00:19:05.270 align:start position:0%
model hard censorship and do inclusion
lists<00:19:03.320><c> improve</c><00:19:03.799><c> these</c><00:19:04.039><c> things</c><00:19:04.720><c> yeah</c><00:19:04.919><c> so</c><00:19:05.159><c> the</c>

00:19:05.270 --> 00:19:05.280 align:start position:0%
lists improve these things yeah so the
 

00:19:05.280 --> 00:19:06.870 align:start position:0%
lists improve these things yeah so the
inclusion<00:19:05.679><c> lists</c><00:19:05.960><c> I</c><00:19:06.039><c> don't</c><00:19:06.159><c> think</c><00:19:06.360><c> they</c><00:19:06.520><c> help</c>

00:19:06.870 --> 00:19:06.880 align:start position:0%
inclusion lists I don't think they help
 

00:19:06.880 --> 00:19:08.750 align:start position:0%
inclusion lists I don't think they help
exactly<00:19:07.200><c> on</c><00:19:07.360><c> that</c><00:19:07.840><c> uh</c><00:19:07.919><c> so</c><00:19:08.120><c> the</c><00:19:08.240><c> censorship</c>

00:19:08.750 --> 00:19:08.760 align:start position:0%
exactly on that uh so the censorship
 

00:19:08.760 --> 00:19:10.909 align:start position:0%
exactly on that uh so the censorship
model<00:19:09.039><c> you</c><00:19:09.159><c> know</c><00:19:09.280><c> luk</c><00:19:09.640><c> um</c><00:19:09.840><c> gave</c><00:19:10.000><c> a</c><00:19:10.120><c> very</c><00:19:10.360><c> good</c>

00:19:10.909 --> 00:19:10.919 align:start position:0%
model you know luk um gave a very good
 

00:19:10.919 --> 00:19:14.510 align:start position:0%
model you know luk um gave a very good
uh<00:19:11.039><c> intuition</c><00:19:11.480><c> of</c><00:19:11.600><c> it</c><00:19:11.840><c> is</c><00:19:12.480><c> that</c><00:19:13.480><c> 7</c><00:19:13.880><c> days</c><00:19:14.200><c> is</c><00:19:14.360><c> the</c>

00:19:14.510 --> 00:19:14.520 align:start position:0%
uh intuition of it is that 7 days is the
 

00:19:14.520 --> 00:19:17.710 align:start position:0%
uh intuition of it is that 7 days is the
time<00:19:14.840><c> we</c><00:19:15.000><c> can</c><00:19:15.760><c> try</c><00:19:16.000><c> to</c><00:19:16.159><c> organize</c><00:19:16.559><c> a</c><00:19:16.679><c> hard</c><00:19:16.880><c> Fork</c>

00:19:17.710 --> 00:19:17.720 align:start position:0%
time we can try to organize a hard Fork
 

00:19:17.720 --> 00:19:19.710 align:start position:0%
time we can try to organize a hard Fork
so<00:19:17.960><c> Suppose</c><00:19:18.280><c> there</c><00:19:18.400><c> is</c><00:19:18.520><c> hard</c><00:19:18.799><c> censorship</c><00:19:19.480><c> my</c>

00:19:19.710 --> 00:19:19.720 align:start position:0%
so Suppose there is hard censorship my
 

00:19:19.720 --> 00:19:21.390 align:start position:0%
so Suppose there is hard censorship my
transactions<00:19:20.320><c> are</c><00:19:20.559><c> not</c><00:19:20.799><c> getting</c><00:19:21.080><c> to</c><00:19:21.280><c> the</c>

00:19:21.390 --> 00:19:21.400 align:start position:0%
transactions are not getting to the
 

00:19:21.400 --> 00:19:23.470 align:start position:0%
transactions are not getting to the
blockchain<00:19:22.400><c> so</c><00:19:22.640><c> what's</c><00:19:22.880><c> going</c><00:19:22.960><c> to</c><00:19:23.080><c> happen</c><00:19:23.320><c> is</c>

00:19:23.470 --> 00:19:23.480 align:start position:0%
blockchain so what's going to happen is
 

00:19:23.480 --> 00:19:24.870 align:start position:0%
blockchain so what's going to happen is
that<00:19:23.600><c> you</c><00:19:23.720><c> know</c><00:19:24.120><c> Twitter's</c><00:19:24.520><c> going</c><00:19:24.600><c> to</c><00:19:24.720><c> catch</c>

00:19:24.870 --> 00:19:24.880 align:start position:0%
that you know Twitter's going to catch
 

00:19:24.880 --> 00:19:26.470 align:start position:0%
that you know Twitter's going to catch
on<00:19:25.039><c> fire</c><00:19:25.320><c> I'm</c><00:19:25.400><c> going</c><00:19:25.520><c> to</c><00:19:25.600><c> scream</c><00:19:25.840><c> to</c><00:19:26.000><c> everybody</c>

00:19:26.470 --> 00:19:26.480 align:start position:0%
on fire I'm going to scream to everybody
 

00:19:26.480 --> 00:19:28.470 align:start position:0%
on fire I'm going to scream to everybody
look<00:19:26.720><c> I'm</c><00:19:26.840><c> being</c><00:19:27.080><c> sensored</c><00:19:27.600><c> for</c><00:19:27.840><c> already</c><00:19:28.159><c> 4</c>

00:19:28.470 --> 00:19:28.480 align:start position:0%
look I'm being sensored for already 4
 

00:19:28.480 --> 00:19:31.870 align:start position:0%
look I'm being sensored for already 4
days<00:19:28.799><c> is</c><00:19:29.720><c> everybody's</c><00:19:30.280><c> going</c><00:19:30.360><c> to</c><00:19:30.640><c> get</c><00:19:31.400><c> uh</c><00:19:31.760><c> you</c>

00:19:31.870 --> 00:19:31.880 align:start position:0%
days is everybody's going to get uh you
 

00:19:31.880 --> 00:19:33.789 align:start position:0%
days is everybody's going to get uh you
know<00:19:32.080><c> iffy</c><00:19:32.400><c> about</c><00:19:32.679><c> this</c><00:19:32.880><c> and</c><00:19:33.080><c> we</c><00:19:33.200><c> are</c><00:19:33.320><c> going</c><00:19:33.480><c> to</c>

00:19:33.789 --> 00:19:33.799 align:start position:0%
know iffy about this and we are going to
 

00:19:33.799 --> 00:19:34.710 align:start position:0%
know iffy about this and we are going to
together

00:19:34.710 --> 00:19:34.720 align:start position:0%
together
 

00:19:34.720 --> 00:19:37.350 align:start position:0%
together
organize<00:19:35.720><c> uh</c><00:19:36.400><c> like</c><00:19:36.520><c> a</c><00:19:36.679><c> hard</c><00:19:36.919><c> work</c><00:19:37.159><c> or</c>

00:19:37.350 --> 00:19:37.360 align:start position:0%
organize uh like a hard work or
 

00:19:37.360 --> 00:19:40.270 align:start position:0%
organize uh like a hard work or
something<00:19:37.919><c> to</c><00:19:38.200><c> fix</c><00:19:38.600><c> this</c><00:19:39.480><c> so</c><00:19:39.720><c> the</c><00:19:39.840><c> point</c><00:19:40.080><c> is</c>

00:19:40.270 --> 00:19:40.280 align:start position:0%
something to fix this so the point is
 

00:19:40.280 --> 00:19:42.510 align:start position:0%
something to fix this so the point is
not<00:19:40.640><c> that</c><00:19:41.000><c> there</c><00:19:41.240><c> can't</c><00:19:41.520><c> be</c><00:19:41.760><c> a</c><00:19:41.880><c> 7-Day</c>

00:19:42.510 --> 00:19:42.520 align:start position:0%
not that there can't be a 7-Day
 

00:19:42.520 --> 00:19:44.830 align:start position:0%
not that there can't be a 7-Day
censorship<00:19:43.520><c> it</c><00:19:43.640><c> is</c><00:19:43.799><c> that</c><00:19:44.080><c> if</c><00:19:44.320><c> there</c><00:19:44.480><c> is</c><00:19:44.679><c> a</c>

00:19:44.830 --> 00:19:44.840 align:start position:0%
censorship it is that if there is a
 

00:19:44.840 --> 00:19:48.270 align:start position:0%
censorship it is that if there is a
seven<00:19:45.400><c> week</c><00:19:46.159><c> censorship</c><00:19:47.159><c> the</c><00:19:47.360><c> Ean</c><00:19:47.880><c> Community</c>

00:19:48.270 --> 00:19:48.280 align:start position:0%
seven week censorship the Ean Community
 

00:19:48.280 --> 00:19:50.430 align:start position:0%
seven week censorship the Ean Community
will<00:19:48.679><c> together</c><00:19:49.000><c> realize</c><00:19:49.760><c> and</c><00:19:49.919><c> say</c><00:19:50.159><c> that</c><00:19:50.320><c> this</c>

00:19:50.430 --> 00:19:50.440 align:start position:0%
will together realize and say that this
 

00:19:50.440 --> 00:19:52.990 align:start position:0%
will together realize and say that this
is<00:19:50.559><c> a</c><00:19:50.799><c> problem</c><00:19:51.320><c> and</c><00:19:51.440><c> then</c><00:19:51.600><c> hard</c><00:19:51.880><c> Fork</c><00:19:52.200><c> away</c><00:19:52.880><c> and</c>

00:19:52.990 --> 00:19:53.000 align:start position:0%
is a problem and then hard Fork away and
 

00:19:53.000 --> 00:19:55.470 align:start position:0%
is a problem and then hard Fork away and
if<00:19:53.120><c> we</c><00:19:53.320><c> put</c><00:19:53.520><c> like</c><00:19:53.640><c> a</c><00:19:53.799><c> one-</c><00:19:54.000><c> day</c><00:19:54.360><c> censorship</c><00:19:55.360><c> I</c>

00:19:55.470 --> 00:19:55.480 align:start position:0%
if we put like a one- day censorship I
 

00:19:55.480 --> 00:19:58.710 align:start position:0%
if we put like a one- day censorship I
would<00:19:55.720><c> convince</c><00:19:56.240><c> nobody</c><00:19:57.240><c> seven</c><00:19:57.640><c> days</c><00:19:58.320><c> it's</c>

00:19:58.710 --> 00:19:58.720 align:start position:0%
would convince nobody seven days it's
 

00:19:58.720 --> 00:20:01.149 align:start position:0%
would convince nobody seven days it's
the<00:19:58.799><c> threshold</c><00:19:59.240><c> that</c><00:19:59.360><c> we</c><00:19:59.840><c> consider</c><00:20:00.840><c> to</c><00:20:01.000><c> be</c>

00:20:01.149 --> 00:20:01.159 align:start position:0%
the threshold that we consider to be
 

00:20:01.159 --> 00:20:02.310 align:start position:0%
the threshold that we consider to be
easy<00:20:01.400><c> to</c>

00:20:02.310 --> 00:20:02.320 align:start position:0%
easy to
 

00:20:02.320 --> 00:20:05.909 align:start position:0%
easy to
convince<00:20:03.320><c> cool</c><00:20:04.200><c> uh</c><00:20:04.360><c> the</c><00:20:04.480><c> next</c><00:20:04.760><c> question</c><00:20:05.720><c> what</c>

00:20:05.909 --> 00:20:05.919 align:start position:0%
convince cool uh the next question what
 

00:20:05.919 --> 00:20:08.230 align:start position:0%
convince cool uh the next question what
happens<00:20:06.200><c> to</c><00:20:06.360><c> levels</c><00:20:06.679><c> in</c><00:20:06.760><c> the</c><00:20:06.840><c> current</c><00:20:07.120><c> PRT</c><00:20:08.120><c> uh</c>

00:20:08.230 --> 00:20:08.240 align:start position:0%
happens to levels in the current PRT uh
 

00:20:08.240 --> 00:20:09.950 align:start position:0%
happens to levels in the current PRT uh
will<00:20:08.400><c> your</c><00:20:08.559><c> plans</c><00:20:08.880><c> be</c><00:20:09.080><c> to</c><00:20:09.240><c> eliminate</c><00:20:09.640><c> it</c><00:20:09.760><c> with</c>

00:20:09.950 --> 00:20:09.960 align:start position:0%
will your plans be to eliminate it with
 

00:20:09.960 --> 00:20:13.590 align:start position:0%
will your plans be to eliminate it with
ZK<00:20:10.840><c> yeah</c><00:20:11.120><c> exactly</c><00:20:11.520><c> so</c><00:20:11.760><c> PRT</c><00:20:12.679><c> uh</c><00:20:13.039><c> if</c><00:20:13.120><c> you</c><00:20:13.280><c> look</c><00:20:13.480><c> at</c>

00:20:13.590 --> 00:20:13.600 align:start position:0%
ZK yeah exactly so PRT uh if you look at
 

00:20:13.600 --> 00:20:15.470 align:start position:0%
ZK yeah exactly so PRT uh if you look at
our<00:20:13.799><c> current</c><00:20:14.080><c> implementation</c><00:20:15.039><c> we</c><00:20:15.120><c> are</c><00:20:15.240><c> doing</c>

00:20:15.470 --> 00:20:15.480 align:start position:0%
our current implementation we are doing
 

00:20:15.480 --> 00:20:17.789 align:start position:0%
our current implementation we are doing
it<00:20:15.600><c> with</c><00:20:15.760><c> three</c><00:20:16.000><c> levels</c><00:20:16.960><c> uh</c><00:20:17.080><c> we</c><00:20:17.240><c> think</c><00:20:17.600><c> with</c>

00:20:17.789 --> 00:20:17.799 align:start position:0%
it with three levels uh we think with
 

00:20:17.799 --> 00:20:19.590 align:start position:0%
it with three levels uh we think with
some<00:20:18.080><c> really</c><00:20:18.320><c> good</c><00:20:18.520><c> engineering</c><00:20:19.080><c> effort</c><00:20:19.480><c> we</c>

00:20:19.590 --> 00:20:19.600 align:start position:0%
some really good engineering effort we
 

00:20:19.600 --> 00:20:22.669 align:start position:0%
some really good engineering effort we
can<00:20:19.760><c> do</c><00:20:19.880><c> it</c><00:20:20.000><c> in</c><00:20:20.559><c> two</c><00:20:21.559><c> uh</c><00:20:21.760><c> we</c><00:20:21.880><c> want</c><00:20:22.080><c> to</c><00:20:22.200><c> do</c><00:20:22.360><c> it</c><00:20:22.480><c> in</c>

00:20:22.669 --> 00:20:22.679 align:start position:0%
can do it in two uh we want to do it in
 

00:20:22.679 --> 00:20:25.590 align:start position:0%
can do it in two uh we want to do it in
one<00:20:23.280><c> using</c><00:20:23.640><c> ZK</c><00:20:24.200><c> exactly</c><00:20:24.640><c> that</c><00:20:25.080><c> and</c><00:20:25.200><c> this</c><00:20:25.320><c> is</c><00:20:25.440><c> a</c>

00:20:25.590 --> 00:20:25.600 align:start position:0%
one using ZK exactly that and this is a
 

00:20:25.600 --> 00:20:27.669 align:start position:0%
one using ZK exactly that and this is a
prerequisite<00:20:26.200><c> of</c><00:20:26.400><c> Dave</c><00:20:26.720><c> so</c><00:20:26.919><c> Dave</c><00:20:27.240><c> already</c>

00:20:27.669 --> 00:20:27.679 align:start position:0%
prerequisite of Dave so Dave already
 

00:20:27.679 --> 00:20:29.830 align:start position:0%
prerequisite of Dave so Dave already
assumes<00:20:28.159><c> that</c><00:20:28.360><c> we</c><00:20:28.720><c> manage</c><00:20:28.960><c> to</c><00:20:29.120><c> reduce</c><00:20:29.520><c> this</c><00:20:29.679><c> to</c>

00:20:29.830 --> 00:20:29.840 align:start position:0%
assumes that we manage to reduce this to
 

00:20:29.840 --> 00:20:32.110 align:start position:0%
assumes that we manage to reduce this to
one

00:20:32.110 --> 00:20:32.120 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:20:32.120 --> 00:20:35.070 align:start position:0%
 
level<00:20:33.120><c> cool</c><00:20:33.600><c> so</c><00:20:34.080><c> what</c><00:20:34.159><c> happens</c><00:20:34.440><c> if</c><00:20:34.520><c> you</c><00:20:34.679><c> mix</c>

00:20:35.070 --> 00:20:35.080 align:start position:0%
level cool so what happens if you mix
 

00:20:35.080 --> 00:20:36.630 align:start position:0%
level cool so what happens if you mix
algorithms<00:20:35.679><c> together</c><00:20:35.960><c> would</c><00:20:36.080><c> that</c><00:20:36.240><c> increase</c>

00:20:36.630 --> 00:20:36.640 align:start position:0%
algorithms together would that increase
 

00:20:36.640 --> 00:20:39.470 align:start position:0%
algorithms together would that increase
security<00:20:37.240><c> do</c><00:20:37.360><c> you</c><00:20:37.480><c> see</c><00:20:37.679><c> it</c><00:20:37.840><c> working</c><00:20:38.840><c> yeah</c><00:20:39.080><c> so</c>

00:20:39.470 --> 00:20:39.480 align:start position:0%
security do you see it working yeah so
 

00:20:39.480 --> 00:20:41.750 align:start position:0%
security do you see it working yeah so
uh<00:20:39.600><c> there</c><00:20:39.679><c> are</c><00:20:39.799><c> two</c><00:20:40.000><c> ways</c><00:20:40.159><c> to</c><00:20:40.360><c> mix</c><00:20:40.799><c> algorithms</c>

00:20:41.750 --> 00:20:41.760 align:start position:0%
uh there are two ways to mix algorithms
 

00:20:41.760 --> 00:20:44.110 align:start position:0%
uh there are two ways to mix algorithms
uh<00:20:41.960><c> one</c><00:20:42.120><c> of</c><00:20:42.280><c> them</c><00:20:42.679><c> is</c><00:20:43.080><c> to</c><00:20:43.280><c> improve</c><00:20:43.600><c> liveness</c>

00:20:44.110 --> 00:20:44.120 align:start position:0%
uh one of them is to improve liveness
 

00:20:44.120 --> 00:20:46.110 align:start position:0%
uh one of them is to improve liveness
actually<00:20:44.880><c> so</c>

00:20:46.110 --> 00:20:46.120 align:start position:0%
actually so
 

00:20:46.120 --> 00:20:49.110 align:start position:0%
actually so
PRT<00:20:47.120><c> finishes</c><00:20:47.840><c> faster</c><00:20:48.360><c> if</c><00:20:48.520><c> there</c><00:20:48.640><c> are</c><00:20:48.919><c> very</c>

00:20:49.110 --> 00:20:49.120 align:start position:0%
PRT finishes faster if there are very
 

00:20:49.120 --> 00:20:51.870 align:start position:0%
PRT finishes faster if there are very
few<00:20:49.400><c> number</c><00:20:49.640><c> of</c><00:20:49.760><c> sybl</c><00:20:50.559><c> so</c><00:20:50.760><c> what</c><00:20:50.919><c> we</c><00:20:51.080><c> could</c><00:20:51.280><c> do</c>

00:20:51.870 --> 00:20:51.880 align:start position:0%
few number of sybl so what we could do
 

00:20:51.880 --> 00:20:54.669 align:start position:0%
few number of sybl so what we could do
is<00:20:52.039><c> launch</c><00:20:52.360><c> PRT</c><00:20:53.120><c> in</c><00:20:53.320><c> parallel</c><00:20:53.760><c> with</c><00:20:53.960><c> Dave</c><00:20:54.559><c> if</c>

00:20:54.669 --> 00:20:54.679 align:start position:0%
is launch PRT in parallel with Dave if
 

00:20:54.679 --> 00:20:57.270 align:start position:0%
is launch PRT in parallel with Dave if
there<00:20:54.799><c> are</c><00:20:54.960><c> no</c><00:20:55.360><c> like</c><00:20:55.600><c> very</c><00:20:55.760><c> few</c><00:20:55.960><c> sibl</c><00:20:56.880><c> PRT</c>

00:20:57.270 --> 00:20:57.280 align:start position:0%
there are no like very few sibl PRT
 

00:20:57.280 --> 00:20:59.350 align:start position:0%
there are no like very few sibl PRT
finishes<00:20:57.799><c> first</c><00:20:58.720><c> if</c><00:20:58.840><c> there</c><00:20:58.960><c> are</c><00:20:59.039><c> a</c><00:20:59.120><c> lot</c><00:20:59.280><c> of</c>

00:20:59.350 --> 00:20:59.360 align:start position:0%
finishes first if there are a lot of
 

00:20:59.360 --> 00:21:02.390 align:start position:0%
finishes first if there are a lot of
sibl<00:21:00.320><c> they</c><00:21:00.640><c> finishes</c><00:21:01.120><c> first</c><00:21:01.720><c> so</c><00:21:01.919><c> then</c><00:21:02.039><c> we</c><00:21:02.200><c> take</c>

00:21:02.390 --> 00:21:02.400 align:start position:0%
sibl they finishes first so then we take
 

00:21:02.400 --> 00:21:04.070 align:start position:0%
sibl they finishes first so then we take
whoever<00:21:02.799><c> answers</c><00:21:03.240><c> first</c><00:21:03.520><c> so</c><00:21:03.679><c> this</c><00:21:03.799><c> is</c><00:21:03.880><c> an</c>

00:21:04.070 --> 00:21:04.080 align:start position:0%
whoever answers first so this is an
 

00:21:04.080 --> 00:21:07.310 align:start position:0%
whoever answers first so this is an
approach<00:21:04.960><c> to</c><00:21:05.240><c> improve</c><00:21:05.760><c> on</c><00:21:06.120><c> liveness</c><00:21:06.919><c> now</c><00:21:07.159><c> to</c>

00:21:07.310 --> 00:21:07.320 align:start position:0%
approach to improve on liveness now to
 

00:21:07.320 --> 00:21:10.310 align:start position:0%
approach to improve on liveness now to
improve<00:21:07.640><c> on</c><00:21:07.880><c> security</c><00:21:08.720><c> we</c><00:21:08.880><c> can</c><00:21:09.080><c> also</c><00:21:09.320><c> mix</c><00:21:09.640><c> them</c>

00:21:10.310 --> 00:21:10.320 align:start position:0%
improve on security we can also mix them
 

00:21:10.320 --> 00:21:13.669 align:start position:0%
improve on security we can also mix them
with<00:21:10.520><c> the</c><00:21:11.120><c> goal</c><00:21:12.120><c> of</c><00:21:12.720><c> uh</c><00:21:12.840><c> you</c><00:21:12.919><c> know</c><00:21:13.159><c> reducing</c>

00:21:13.669 --> 00:21:13.679 align:start position:0%
with the goal of uh you know reducing
 

00:21:13.679 --> 00:21:17.070 align:start position:0%
with the goal of uh you know reducing
the<00:21:13.880><c> risk</c><00:21:14.240><c> of</c><00:21:14.559><c> bug</c><00:21:15.400><c> so</c><00:21:15.600><c> we</c><00:21:15.760><c> could</c><00:21:16.000><c> have</c><00:21:16.279><c> like</c><00:21:16.520><c> a</c>

00:21:17.070 --> 00:21:17.080 align:start position:0%
the risk of bug so we could have like a
 

00:21:17.080 --> 00:21:20.789 align:start position:0%
the risk of bug so we could have like a
a<00:21:17.400><c> Consortium</c><00:21:18.400><c> like</c><00:21:18.640><c> a</c><00:21:19.159><c> quorum</c><00:21:20.159><c> of</c><00:21:20.480><c> four</c>

00:21:20.789 --> 00:21:20.799 align:start position:0%
a Consortium like a quorum of four
 

00:21:20.799 --> 00:21:23.950 align:start position:0%
a Consortium like a quorum of four
members<00:21:21.640><c> one</c><00:21:21.880><c> member</c><00:21:22.200><c> could</c><00:21:22.400><c> be</c><00:21:22.640><c> PRT</c><00:21:23.600><c> but</c>

00:21:23.950 --> 00:21:23.960 align:start position:0%
members one member could be PRT but
 

00:21:23.960 --> 00:21:26.750 align:start position:0%
members one member could be PRT but
permissioned<00:21:24.960><c> so</c><00:21:25.240><c> permissioned</c><00:21:25.840><c> PRT</c><00:21:26.400><c> has</c><00:21:26.559><c> no</c>

00:21:26.750 --> 00:21:26.760 align:start position:0%
permissioned so permissioned PRT has no
 

00:21:26.760 --> 00:21:28.590 align:start position:0%
permissioned so permissioned PRT has no
problems<00:21:27.120><c> of</c><00:21:27.279><c> liveness</c><00:21:27.679><c> so</c><00:21:27.799><c> we</c><00:21:27.919><c> could</c><00:21:28.120><c> have</c>

00:21:28.590 --> 00:21:28.600 align:start position:0%
problems of liveness so we could have
 

00:21:28.600 --> 00:21:30.669 align:start position:0%
problems of liveness so we could have
that<00:21:28.799><c> one</c><00:21:28.919><c> of</c><00:21:29.039><c> the</c><00:21:29.120><c> members</c><00:21:29.440><c> in</c><00:21:29.559><c> the</c><00:21:29.679><c> Forum</c>

00:21:30.669 --> 00:21:30.679 align:start position:0%
that one of the members in the Forum
 

00:21:30.679 --> 00:21:32.110 align:start position:0%
that one of the members in the Forum
then<00:21:30.880><c> we</c><00:21:31.000><c> could</c><00:21:31.200><c> have</c><00:21:31.400><c> Dave</c><00:21:31.679><c> as</c><00:21:31.840><c> another</c>

00:21:32.110 --> 00:21:32.120 align:start position:0%
then we could have Dave as another
 

00:21:32.120 --> 00:21:34.390 align:start position:0%
then we could have Dave as another
member<00:21:32.360><c> in</c><00:21:32.480><c> the</c><00:21:32.600><c> Forum</c><00:21:33.559><c> then</c><00:21:33.720><c> we</c><00:21:33.840><c> could</c><00:21:34.039><c> have</c><00:21:34.320><c> I</c>

00:21:34.390 --> 00:21:34.400 align:start position:0%
member in the Forum then we could have I
 

00:21:34.400 --> 00:21:38.269 align:start position:0%
member in the Forum then we could have I
don't<00:21:34.600><c> know</c><00:21:35.159><c> a</c><00:21:35.400><c> te</c><00:21:36.279><c> or</c><00:21:36.679><c> a</c><00:21:36.840><c> quarum</c><00:21:37.240><c> of</c><00:21:37.440><c> T</c><00:21:38.159><c> and</c>

00:21:38.269 --> 00:21:38.279 align:start position:0%
don't know a te or a quarum of T and
 

00:21:38.279 --> 00:21:40.350 align:start position:0%
don't know a te or a quarum of T and
then<00:21:38.400><c> we</c><00:21:38.480><c> could</c><00:21:38.640><c> have</c><00:21:38.840><c> a</c><00:21:39.000><c> a</c><00:21:39.120><c> multisig</c><00:21:39.799><c> you</c><00:21:39.919><c> know</c>

00:21:40.350 --> 00:21:40.360 align:start position:0%
then we could have a a multisig you know
 

00:21:40.360 --> 00:21:42.789 align:start position:0%
then we could have a a multisig you know
so<00:21:40.600><c> if</c><00:21:40.720><c> we</c><00:21:40.880><c> have</c><00:21:41.039><c> this</c><00:21:41.200><c> Quorum</c><00:21:41.640><c> of</c><00:21:41.799><c> like</c>

00:21:42.789 --> 00:21:42.799 align:start position:0%
so if we have this Quorum of like
 

00:21:42.799 --> 00:21:46.950 align:start position:0%
so if we have this Quorum of like
many<00:21:44.159><c> um</c><00:21:45.159><c> you</c><00:21:45.279><c> know</c><00:21:45.600><c> it</c><00:21:45.799><c> it</c><00:21:45.919><c> would</c><00:21:46.200><c> take</c><00:21:46.679><c> a</c><00:21:46.799><c> lot</c>

00:21:46.950 --> 00:21:46.960 align:start position:0%
many um you know it it would take a lot
 

00:21:46.960 --> 00:21:48.830 align:start position:0%
many um you know it it would take a lot
of<00:21:47.159><c> effort</c><00:21:47.480><c> to</c><00:21:47.640><c> try</c><00:21:47.840><c> to</c><00:21:48.000><c> corrupt</c><00:21:48.360><c> all</c><00:21:48.480><c> of</c><00:21:48.640><c> them</c>

00:21:48.830 --> 00:21:48.840 align:start position:0%
of effort to try to corrupt all of them
 

00:21:48.840 --> 00:21:51.510 align:start position:0%
of effort to try to corrupt all of them
at<00:21:48.960><c> the</c><00:21:49.080><c> same</c><00:21:49.320><c> time</c><00:21:49.520><c> so</c><00:21:49.679><c> we</c><00:21:49.880><c> reduce</c><00:21:50.240><c> the</c><00:21:50.520><c> risk</c>

00:21:51.510 --> 00:21:51.520 align:start position:0%
at the same time so we reduce the risk
 

00:21:51.520 --> 00:21:53.029 align:start position:0%
at the same time so we reduce the risk
uh<00:21:51.679><c> by</c><00:21:51.919><c> reducing</c><00:21:52.360><c> you</c><00:21:52.440><c> know</c><00:21:52.600><c> the</c><00:21:52.720><c> chance</c><00:21:52.919><c> of</c>

00:21:53.029 --> 00:21:53.039 align:start position:0%
uh by reducing you know the chance of
 

00:21:53.039 --> 00:21:54.909 align:start position:0%
uh by reducing you know the chance of
there<00:21:53.200><c> being</c><00:21:53.400><c> a</c><00:21:53.559><c> bug</c><00:21:54.240><c> so</c><00:21:54.480><c> that's</c><00:21:54.679><c> how</c><00:21:54.799><c> you</c>

00:21:54.909 --> 00:21:54.919 align:start position:0%
there being a bug so that's how you
 

00:21:54.919 --> 00:21:56.350 align:start position:0%
there being a bug so that's how you
could<00:21:55.080><c> mix</c>

00:21:56.350 --> 00:21:56.360 align:start position:0%
could mix
 

00:21:56.360 --> 00:21:59.950 align:start position:0%
could mix
protocols<00:21:57.360><c> cool</c><00:21:58.080><c> so</c><00:21:58.679><c> um</c><00:21:59.000><c> what</c><00:21:59.159><c> if</c><00:21:59.400><c> the</c><00:21:59.559><c> goal</c><00:21:59.799><c> is</c>

00:21:59.950 --> 00:21:59.960 align:start position:0%
protocols cool so um what if the goal is
 

00:21:59.960 --> 00:22:02.350 align:start position:0%
protocols cool so um what if the goal is
not<00:22:00.200><c> to</c><00:22:01.159><c> disrupt</c><00:22:01.559><c> the</c><00:22:01.679><c> chain</c><00:22:01.919><c> but</c><00:22:02.080><c> just</c><00:22:02.200><c> to</c>

00:22:02.350 --> 00:22:02.360 align:start position:0%
not to disrupt the chain but just to
 

00:22:02.360 --> 00:22:04.590 align:start position:0%
not to disrupt the chain but just to
delay<00:22:02.679><c> the</c><00:22:02.799><c> chain</c><00:22:03.200><c> yeah</c><00:22:03.480><c> how</c><00:22:04.080><c> large</c><00:22:04.320><c> would</c><00:22:04.480><c> the</c>

00:22:04.590 --> 00:22:04.600 align:start position:0%
delay the chain yeah how large would the
 

00:22:04.600 --> 00:22:06.070 align:start position:0%
delay the chain yeah how large would the
cost<00:22:04.799><c> be</c><00:22:04.919><c> if</c><00:22:05.000><c> the</c><00:22:05.120><c> attack</c><00:22:05.400><c> presuming</c><00:22:05.760><c> the</c><00:22:05.880><c> only</c>

00:22:06.070 --> 00:22:06.080 align:start position:0%
cost be if the attack presuming the only
 

00:22:06.080 --> 00:22:08.750 align:start position:0%
cost be if the attack presuming the only
goal<00:22:06.279><c> is</c><00:22:06.400><c> to</c><00:22:06.600><c> delay</c><00:22:06.960><c> by</c><00:22:07.120><c> four</c><00:22:07.400><c> weeks</c><00:22:08.200><c> so</c><00:22:08.559><c> if</c><00:22:08.640><c> you</c>

00:22:08.750 --> 00:22:08.760 align:start position:0%
goal is to delay by four weeks so if you
 

00:22:08.760 --> 00:22:11.110 align:start position:0%
goal is to delay by four weeks so if you
want<00:22:08.919><c> to</c><00:22:09.080><c> delay</c><00:22:09.440><c> by</c><00:22:09.640><c> four</c><00:22:09.919><c> weeks</c><00:22:10.480><c> I</c><00:22:10.640><c> think</c><00:22:10.880><c> you</c>

00:22:11.110 --> 00:22:11.120 align:start position:0%
want to delay by four weeks I think you
 

00:22:11.120 --> 00:22:13.149 align:start position:0%
want to delay by four weeks I think you
need<00:22:11.559><c> more</c><00:22:11.760><c> than10</c><00:22:12.159><c> billion</c><00:22:12.760><c> or</c><00:22:12.919><c> something</c>

00:22:13.149 --> 00:22:13.159 align:start position:0%
need more than10 billion or something
 

00:22:13.159 --> 00:22:14.710 align:start position:0%
need more than10 billion or something
you<00:22:13.240><c> know</c><00:22:13.360><c> we</c><00:22:13.440><c> have</c><00:22:13.559><c> to</c><00:22:13.679><c> burn</c><00:22:13.919><c> the</c><00:22:14.080><c> GDP</c><00:22:14.559><c> of</c>

00:22:14.710 --> 00:22:14.720 align:start position:0%
you know we have to burn the GDP of
 

00:22:14.720 --> 00:22:17.230 align:start position:0%
you know we have to burn the GDP of
Japan<00:22:15.320><c> it's</c><00:22:15.520><c> crazy</c><00:22:15.919><c> you</c><00:22:16.039><c> know</c><00:22:16.520><c> we</c><00:22:16.960><c> sometimes</c>

00:22:17.230 --> 00:22:17.240 align:start position:0%
Japan it's crazy you know we sometimes
 

00:22:17.240 --> 00:22:20.590 align:start position:0%
Japan it's crazy you know we sometimes
lose<00:22:17.880><c> sight</c><00:22:18.880><c> of</c><00:22:19.200><c> like</c><00:22:19.520><c> exponential</c><00:22:20.320><c> or</c>

00:22:20.590 --> 00:22:20.600 align:start position:0%
lose sight of like exponential or
 

00:22:20.600 --> 00:22:23.830 align:start position:0%
lose sight of like exponential or
logarithmic<00:22:21.600><c> uh</c><00:22:22.559><c> so</c><00:22:23.039><c> really</c><00:22:23.279><c> if</c><00:22:23.360><c> you</c><00:22:23.520><c> burn</c>

00:22:23.830 --> 00:22:23.840 align:start position:0%
logarithmic uh so really if you burn
 

00:22:23.840 --> 00:22:25.510 align:start position:0%
logarithmic uh so really if you burn
like<00:22:24.000><c> trillions</c><00:22:24.440><c> you</c><00:22:24.559><c> can't</c><00:22:24.760><c> even</c><00:22:25.159><c> fit</c><00:22:25.400><c> that</c>

00:22:25.510 --> 00:22:25.520 align:start position:0%
like trillions you can't even fit that
 

00:22:25.520 --> 00:22:27.950 align:start position:0%
like trillions you can't even fit that
on<00:22:25.640><c> the</c><00:22:25.760><c> blockchain</c><00:22:26.720><c> then</c><00:22:27.000><c> you</c><00:22:27.440><c> you</c><00:22:27.640><c> couldn't</c>

00:22:27.950 --> 00:22:27.960 align:start position:0%
on the blockchain then you you couldn't
 

00:22:27.960 --> 00:22:32.630 align:start position:0%
on the blockchain then you you couldn't
really<00:22:28.200><c> push</c><00:22:28.720><c> pass</c><00:22:29.000><c> like</c><00:22:29.159><c> this</c><00:22:29.360><c> four</c><00:22:29.520><c> or</c><00:22:29.720><c> five</c>

00:22:32.630 --> 00:22:32.640 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:22:32.640 --> 00:22:37.269 align:start position:0%
 
weeks<00:22:33.640><c> uh</c><00:22:33.760><c> the</c><00:22:33.919><c> next</c><00:22:34.159><c> one</c><00:22:35.159><c> ASM</c><00:22:35.520><c> totically</c><00:22:36.279><c> is</c>

00:22:37.269 --> 00:22:37.279 align:start position:0%
weeks uh the next one ASM totically is
 

00:22:37.279 --> 00:22:39.470 align:start position:0%
weeks uh the next one ASM totically is
um<00:22:37.880><c> is</c><00:22:37.960><c> it</c><00:22:38.159><c> still</c><00:22:38.400><c> logarith</c><00:22:38.799><c> Matic</c><00:22:39.039><c> delay</c>

00:22:39.470 --> 00:22:39.480 align:start position:0%
um is it still logarith Matic delay
 

00:22:39.480 --> 00:22:41.430 align:start position:0%
um is it still logarith Matic delay
right<00:22:39.880><c> yeah</c><00:22:40.080><c> exactly</c><00:22:40.679><c> what</c><00:22:40.799><c> we</c><00:22:40.960><c> did</c><00:22:41.120><c> is</c><00:22:41.279><c> we</c>

00:22:41.430 --> 00:22:41.440 align:start position:0%
right yeah exactly what we did is we
 

00:22:41.440 --> 00:22:43.750 align:start position:0%
right yeah exactly what we did is we
reduced<00:22:41.880><c> the</c><00:22:42.080><c> constant</c><00:22:42.440><c> multiplying</c><00:22:43.080><c> it</c><00:22:43.320><c> by</c>

00:22:43.750 --> 00:22:43.760 align:start position:0%
reduced the constant multiplying it by
 

00:22:43.760 --> 00:22:46.110 align:start position:0%
reduced the constant multiplying it by
about<00:22:44.039><c> one</c><00:22:44.240><c> order</c><00:22:44.520><c> of</c>

00:22:46.110 --> 00:22:46.120 align:start position:0%
about one order of
 

00:22:46.120 --> 00:22:48.630 align:start position:0%
about one order of
magnitude<00:22:47.120><c> okay</c><00:22:47.960><c> um</c><00:22:48.080><c> you</c><00:22:48.200><c> have</c><00:22:48.320><c> multiple</c>

00:22:48.630 --> 00:22:48.640 align:start position:0%
magnitude okay um you have multiple
 

00:22:48.640 --> 00:22:50.269 align:start position:0%
magnitude okay um you have multiple
Willies<00:22:48.960><c> that</c><00:22:49.039><c> are</c><00:22:49.240><c> good</c><00:22:49.480><c> but</c><00:22:49.600><c> then</c><00:22:49.720><c> I</c><00:22:49.919><c> decide</c>

00:22:50.269 --> 00:22:50.279 align:start position:0%
Willies that are good but then I decide
 

00:22:50.279 --> 00:22:54.990 align:start position:0%
Willies that are good but then I decide
to<00:22:50.520><c> go</c><00:22:51.080><c> bad</c><00:22:51.960><c> they</c><00:22:52.159><c> can't</c><00:22:52.760><c> because</c><00:22:53.840><c> um</c><00:22:54.840><c> they</c>

00:22:54.990 --> 00:22:55.000 align:start position:0%
to go bad they can't because um they
 

00:22:55.000 --> 00:22:56.990 align:start position:0%
to go bad they can't because um they
when<00:22:55.159><c> they</c><00:22:55.279><c> do</c><00:22:55.400><c> a</c><00:22:55.559><c> bisection</c><00:22:56.360><c> they</c><00:22:56.520><c> need</c><00:22:56.799><c> to</c>

00:22:56.990 --> 00:22:57.000 align:start position:0%
when they do a bisection they need to
 

00:22:57.000 --> 00:22:58.830 align:start position:0%
when they do a bisection they need to
provide<00:22:57.240><c> the</c><00:22:57.360><c> merco</c><00:22:57.760><c> proof</c><00:22:58.039><c> and</c><00:22:58.120><c> the</c><00:22:58.200><c> proof</c>

00:22:58.830 --> 00:22:58.840 align:start position:0%
provide the merco proof and the proof
 

00:22:58.840 --> 00:23:01.830 align:start position:0%
provide the merco proof and the proof
w't<00:22:59.279><c> won't</c><00:22:59.880><c> just</c><00:23:00.120><c> match</c><00:23:00.679><c> yeah</c><00:23:01.080><c> will</c><00:23:01.400><c> just</c><00:23:01.559><c> not</c>

00:23:01.830 --> 00:23:01.840 align:start position:0%
w't won't just match yeah will just not
 

00:23:01.840 --> 00:23:04.269 align:start position:0%
w't won't just match yeah will just not
match<00:23:02.760><c> cool</c><00:23:03.080><c> all</c><00:23:03.200><c> right</c><00:23:03.600><c> everyone</c><00:23:03.960><c> clap</c><00:23:04.200><c> your</c>

00:23:04.269 --> 00:23:04.279 align:start position:0%
match cool all right everyone clap your
 

00:23:04.279 --> 00:23:05.870 align:start position:0%
match cool all right everyone clap your
hands<00:23:04.480><c> for</c><00:23:04.640><c> Gabriel</c><00:23:05.000><c> and</c><00:23:05.120><c> thank</c><00:23:05.279><c> him</c><00:23:05.400><c> for</c><00:23:05.640><c> his</c>

00:23:05.870 --> 00:23:05.880 align:start position:0%
hands for Gabriel and thank him for his
 

00:23:05.880 --> 00:23:07.190 align:start position:0%
hands for Gabriel and thank him for his
time<00:23:06.039><c> he</c><00:23:06.159><c> spent</c>

00:23:07.190 --> 00:23:07.200 align:start position:0%
time he spent
 

00:23:07.200 --> 00:23:13.080 align:start position:0%
time he spent
on<00:23:08.200><c> the</c><00:23:08.400><c> next</c><00:23:08.720><c> session</c><00:23:09.159><c> will</c><00:23:09.400><c> be</c><00:23:09.760><c> at</c><00:23:10.080><c> 11:30</c>

