WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:04.350 align:start position:0%
 
foreign

00:00:04.350 --> 00:00:04.360 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:00:04.360 --> 00:00:16.129 align:start position:0%
 
[Music]

00:00:16.129 --> 00:00:16.139 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:00:16.139 --> 00:00:18.470 align:start position:0%
 
I'm<00:00:16.680><c> going</c><00:00:16.859><c> to</c><00:00:16.980><c> talk</c><00:00:17.220><c> a</c><00:00:17.400><c> bit</c><00:00:17.520><c> about</c><00:00:17.640><c> scaling</c>

00:00:18.470 --> 00:00:18.480 align:start position:0%
I'm going to talk a bit about scaling
 

00:00:18.480 --> 00:00:20.810 align:start position:0%
I'm going to talk a bit about scaling
but<00:00:18.960><c> I</c><00:00:19.140><c> want</c><00:00:19.260><c> to</c><00:00:19.440><c> start</c><00:00:19.680><c> first</c><00:00:19.980><c> just</c><00:00:20.279><c> with</c><00:00:20.520><c> a</c>

00:00:20.810 --> 00:00:20.820 align:start position:0%
but I want to start first just with a
 

00:00:20.820 --> 00:00:23.750 align:start position:0%
but I want to start first just with a
very<00:00:21.420><c> quick</c><00:00:21.600><c> apology</c><00:00:22.140><c> in</c><00:00:23.039><c> case</c><00:00:23.160><c> you</c><00:00:23.460><c> were</c><00:00:23.580><c> here</c>

00:00:23.750 --> 00:00:23.760 align:start position:0%
very quick apology in case you were here
 

00:00:23.760 --> 00:00:25.730 align:start position:0%
very quick apology in case you were here
to<00:00:24.000><c> hear</c><00:00:24.300><c> about</c><00:00:24.420><c> multi-dimensional</c><00:00:25.380><c> resource</c>

00:00:25.730 --> 00:00:25.740 align:start position:0%
to hear about multi-dimensional resource
 

00:00:25.740 --> 00:00:28.189 align:start position:0%
to hear about multi-dimensional resource
pricing<00:00:26.119><c> I</c><00:00:27.119><c> had</c><00:00:27.300><c> a</c><00:00:27.420><c> bit</c><00:00:27.539><c> of</c><00:00:27.660><c> a</c><00:00:27.720><c> hard</c><00:00:27.840><c> time</c><00:00:27.960><c> to</c>

00:00:28.189 --> 00:00:28.199 align:start position:0%
pricing I had a bit of a hard time to
 

00:00:28.199 --> 00:00:29.630 align:start position:0%
pricing I had a bit of a hard time to
make<00:00:28.320><c> up</c><00:00:28.500><c> my</c><00:00:28.619><c> mind</c><00:00:28.740><c> which</c><00:00:28.920><c> of</c><00:00:29.039><c> the</c><00:00:29.160><c> two</c><00:00:29.279><c> talks</c><00:00:29.519><c> I</c>

00:00:29.630 --> 00:00:29.640 align:start position:0%
make up my mind which of the two talks I
 

00:00:29.640 --> 00:00:30.890 align:start position:0%
make up my mind which of the two talks I
wanted<00:00:29.699><c> to</c><00:00:29.880><c> give</c><00:00:30.000><c> so</c><00:00:30.180><c> for</c><00:00:30.420><c> a</c><00:00:30.539><c> while</c><00:00:30.599><c> on</c><00:00:30.779><c> the</c>

00:00:30.890 --> 00:00:30.900 align:start position:0%
wanted to give so for a while on the
 

00:00:30.900 --> 00:00:33.889 align:start position:0%
wanted to give so for a while on the
website<00:00:31.140><c> both</c><00:00:31.439><c> titles</c><00:00:31.920><c> were</c><00:00:32.340><c> on</c><00:00:32.520><c> there</c><00:00:32.700><c> so</c><00:00:33.000><c> if</c>

00:00:33.889 --> 00:00:33.899 align:start position:0%
website both titles were on there so if
 

00:00:33.899 --> 00:00:35.510 align:start position:0%
website both titles were on there so if
you're<00:00:34.079><c> really</c><00:00:34.260><c> into</c><00:00:34.440><c> multimeter</c><00:00:35.219><c> resource</c>

00:00:35.510 --> 00:00:35.520 align:start position:0%
you're really into multimeter resource
 

00:00:35.520 --> 00:00:38.389 align:start position:0%
you're really into multimeter resource
pricing<00:00:35.820><c> which</c><00:00:36.059><c> you</c><00:00:36.300><c> should</c><00:00:36.480><c> be</c><00:00:37.160><c> I</c><00:00:38.160><c> can</c><00:00:38.280><c> only</c>

00:00:38.389 --> 00:00:38.399 align:start position:0%
pricing which you should be I can only
 

00:00:38.399 --> 00:00:40.369 align:start position:0%
pricing which you should be I can only
recommend<00:00:38.880><c> I</c><00:00:39.360><c> gave</c><00:00:39.480><c> a</c><00:00:39.660><c> talk</c><00:00:39.780><c> earlier</c><00:00:40.140><c> this</c>

00:00:40.369 --> 00:00:40.379 align:start position:0%
recommend I gave a talk earlier this
 

00:00:40.379 --> 00:00:43.130 align:start position:0%
recommend I gave a talk earlier this
year<00:00:40.879><c> about</c><00:00:41.879><c> it</c><00:00:42.239><c> in</c><00:00:42.360><c> the</c><00:00:42.480><c> ethereum</c><00:00:42.780><c> context</c>

00:00:43.130 --> 00:00:43.140 align:start position:0%
year about it in the ethereum context
 

00:00:43.140 --> 00:00:44.569 align:start position:0%
year about it in the ethereum context
which

00:00:44.569 --> 00:00:44.579 align:start position:0%
which
 

00:00:44.579 --> 00:00:47.030 align:start position:0%
which
um<00:00:44.640><c> is</c><00:00:45.360><c> quite</c><00:00:45.960><c> interesting</c><00:00:46.260><c> I</c><00:00:46.440><c> think</c><00:00:46.559><c> and</c><00:00:46.860><c> then</c>

00:00:47.030 --> 00:00:47.040 align:start position:0%
um is quite interesting I think and then
 

00:00:47.040 --> 00:00:50.209 align:start position:0%
um is quite interesting I think and then
also<00:00:47.520><c> with</c><00:00:48.500><c> eip4844</c><00:00:49.500><c> we</c><00:00:49.800><c> are</c><00:00:49.920><c> about</c><00:00:50.039><c> to</c>

00:00:50.209 --> 00:00:50.219 align:start position:0%
also with eip4844 we are about to
 

00:00:50.219 --> 00:00:52.970 align:start position:0%
also with eip4844 we are about to
introduce<00:00:50.640><c> a</c><00:00:50.940><c> there's</c><00:00:51.840><c> an</c><00:00:52.020><c> open</c><00:00:52.079><c> PR</c><00:00:52.379><c> to</c><00:00:52.860><c> to</c>

00:00:52.970 --> 00:00:52.980 align:start position:0%
introduce a there's an open PR to to
 

00:00:52.980 --> 00:00:54.950 align:start position:0%
introduce a there's an open PR to to
update<00:00:53.460><c> the</c><00:00:53.579><c> fee</c><00:00:53.820><c> Market</c><00:00:53.940><c> there</c><00:00:54.239><c> and</c>

00:00:54.950 --> 00:00:54.960 align:start position:0%
update the fee Market there and
 

00:00:54.960 --> 00:00:56.389 align:start position:0%
update the fee Market there and
hopefully<00:00:55.320><c> fingers</c><00:00:55.680><c> crossed</c><00:00:56.039><c> this</c><00:00:56.100><c> will</c><00:00:56.280><c> be</c>

00:00:56.389 --> 00:00:56.399 align:start position:0%
hopefully fingers crossed this will be
 

00:00:56.399 --> 00:00:58.430 align:start position:0%
hopefully fingers crossed this will be
the<00:00:56.520><c> very</c><00:00:56.640><c> first</c><00:00:56.820><c> time</c><00:00:57.059><c> that</c><00:00:57.360><c> we</c><00:00:57.539><c> start</c><00:00:57.780><c> moving</c>

00:00:58.430 --> 00:00:58.440 align:start position:0%
the very first time that we start moving
 

00:00:58.440 --> 00:00:59.990 align:start position:0%
the very first time that we start moving
to<00:00:58.559><c> multi-dimensional</c><00:00:59.219><c> Resource</c><00:00:59.460><c> pricing</c><00:00:59.760><c> in</c>

00:00:59.990 --> 00:01:00.000 align:start position:0%
to multi-dimensional Resource pricing in
 

00:01:00.000 --> 00:01:01.490 align:start position:0%
to multi-dimensional Resource pricing in
practice<00:01:00.120><c> on</c><00:01:00.420><c> ethereum</c><00:01:00.840><c> like</c><00:01:01.079><c> in</c><00:01:01.260><c> this</c><00:01:01.379><c> case</c>

00:01:01.490 --> 00:01:01.500 align:start position:0%
practice on ethereum like in this case
 

00:01:01.500 --> 00:01:05.030 align:start position:0%
practice on ethereum like in this case
two-dimensional<00:01:02.160><c> so</c><00:01:02.399><c> do</c><00:01:03.120><c> have</c><00:01:03.359><c> a</c><00:01:03.480><c> look</c>

00:01:05.030 --> 00:01:05.040 align:start position:0%
two-dimensional so do have a look
 

00:01:05.040 --> 00:01:07.730 align:start position:0%
two-dimensional so do have a look
um<00:01:05.100><c> but</c><00:01:05.460><c> today</c><00:01:05.880><c> here</c><00:01:06.780><c> I'll</c><00:01:07.439><c> talk</c><00:01:07.619><c> about</c>

00:01:07.730 --> 00:01:07.740 align:start position:0%
um but today here I'll talk about
 

00:01:07.740 --> 00:01:09.469 align:start position:0%
um but today here I'll talk about
scaling<00:01:08.220><c> and</c><00:01:08.340><c> specifically</c>

00:01:09.469 --> 00:01:09.479 align:start position:0%
scaling and specifically
 

00:01:09.479 --> 00:01:10.250 align:start position:0%
scaling and specifically
um

00:01:10.250 --> 00:01:10.260 align:start position:0%
um
 

00:01:10.260 --> 00:01:12.410 align:start position:0%
um
um<00:01:10.380><c> Roll-Ups</c><00:01:10.920><c> why</c><00:01:11.100><c> Roll-Ups</c>

00:01:12.410 --> 00:01:12.420 align:start position:0%
um Roll-Ups why Roll-Ups
 

00:01:12.420 --> 00:01:16.070 align:start position:0%
um Roll-Ups why Roll-Ups
um first<00:01:13.260><c> one</c><00:01:13.500><c> I</c><00:01:13.680><c> want</c><00:01:13.920><c> to</c><00:01:14.100><c> talk</c><00:01:15.060><c> more</c><00:01:15.299><c> more</c><00:01:15.540><c> in</c>

00:01:16.070 --> 00:01:16.080 align:start position:0%
um first one I want to talk more more in
 

00:01:16.080 --> 00:01:19.130 align:start position:0%
um first one I want to talk more more in
on<00:01:16.439><c> the</c><00:01:16.619><c> theoretical</c><00:01:17.040><c> side</c><00:01:17.220><c> why</c><00:01:17.820><c> really</c><00:01:18.420><c> is</c><00:01:18.840><c> a</c>

00:01:19.130 --> 00:01:19.140 align:start position:0%
on the theoretical side why really is a
 

00:01:19.140 --> 00:01:20.929 align:start position:0%
on the theoretical side why really is a
roll<00:01:19.380><c> up</c><00:01:19.560><c> so</c><00:01:19.799><c> fundamental</c><00:01:20.220><c> to</c><00:01:20.340><c> scaling</c><00:01:20.759><c> and</c>

00:01:20.929 --> 00:01:20.939 align:start position:0%
roll up so fundamental to scaling and
 

00:01:20.939 --> 00:01:22.070 align:start position:0%
roll up so fundamental to scaling and
then

00:01:22.070 --> 00:01:22.080 align:start position:0%
then
 

00:01:22.080 --> 00:01:23.770 align:start position:0%
then
um<00:01:22.140><c> bring</c><00:01:22.439><c> it</c><00:01:22.619><c> back</c><00:01:22.799><c> and</c><00:01:23.040><c> and</c><00:01:23.280><c> talk</c><00:01:23.520><c> about</c>

00:01:23.770 --> 00:01:23.780 align:start position:0%
um bring it back and and talk about
 

00:01:23.780 --> 00:01:26.990 align:start position:0%
um bring it back and and talk about
ethereum's<00:01:24.780><c> uh</c><00:01:25.380><c> future</c><00:01:25.619><c> place</c><00:01:25.979><c> in</c><00:01:26.640><c> that</c><00:01:26.820><c> world</c>

00:01:26.990 --> 00:01:27.000 align:start position:0%
ethereum's uh future place in that world
 

00:01:27.000 --> 00:01:28.550 align:start position:0%
ethereum's uh future place in that world
basically

00:01:28.550 --> 00:01:28.560 align:start position:0%
basically
 

00:01:28.560 --> 00:01:31.969 align:start position:0%
basically
um<00:01:28.680><c> so</c><00:01:28.920><c> first</c><00:01:29.100><c> why</c><00:01:29.939><c> why</c><00:01:30.540><c> roll</c><00:01:30.840><c> ups</c>

00:01:31.969 --> 00:01:31.979 align:start position:0%
um so first why why roll ups
 

00:01:31.979 --> 00:01:35.330 align:start position:0%
um so first why why roll ups
um<00:01:32.100><c> uh</c><00:01:32.939><c> and</c><00:01:33.060><c> and</c><00:01:33.240><c> I</c><00:01:33.540><c> want</c><00:01:33.600><c> to</c><00:01:33.720><c> start</c><00:01:33.840><c> by</c><00:01:34.320><c> uh</c><00:01:35.220><c> with</c>

00:01:35.330 --> 00:01:35.340 align:start position:0%
um uh and and I want to start by uh with
 

00:01:35.340 --> 00:01:37.249 align:start position:0%
um uh and and I want to start by uh with
something<00:01:35.820><c> that</c><00:01:36.060><c> I</c><00:01:36.180><c> call</c><00:01:36.299><c> execution</c><00:01:36.840><c> chains</c>

00:01:37.249 --> 00:01:37.259 align:start position:0%
something that I call execution chains
 

00:01:37.259 --> 00:01:38.990 align:start position:0%
something that I call execution chains
it's<00:01:37.380><c> basically</c><00:01:37.680><c> just</c><00:01:37.920><c> blockchains</c><00:01:38.759><c> as</c><00:01:38.880><c> you</c>

00:01:38.990 --> 00:01:39.000 align:start position:0%
it's basically just blockchains as you
 

00:01:39.000 --> 00:01:40.850 align:start position:0%
it's basically just blockchains as you
know<00:01:39.119><c> them</c><00:01:39.299><c> so</c><00:01:39.780><c> uh</c><00:01:40.020><c> Bitcoin</c><00:01:40.439><c> of</c><00:01:40.560><c> course</c><00:01:40.680><c> was</c>

00:01:40.850 --> 00:01:40.860 align:start position:0%
know them so uh Bitcoin of course was
 

00:01:40.860 --> 00:01:42.289 align:start position:0%
know them so uh Bitcoin of course was
the<00:01:41.100><c> very</c><00:01:41.220><c> first</c><00:01:41.400><c> ever</c>

00:01:42.289 --> 00:01:42.299 align:start position:0%
the very first ever
 

00:01:42.299 --> 00:01:45.230 align:start position:0%
the very first ever
um<00:01:42.360><c> special</c><00:01:42.780><c> purpose</c><00:01:43.259><c> execution</c><00:01:44.220><c> chain</c><00:01:44.460><c> uh</c>

00:01:45.230 --> 00:01:45.240 align:start position:0%
um special purpose execution chain uh
 

00:01:45.240 --> 00:01:46.429 align:start position:0%
um special purpose execution chain uh
special<00:01:45.479><c> purpose</c><00:01:45.780><c> just</c><00:01:45.900><c> because</c><00:01:46.079><c> it's</c><00:01:46.259><c> only</c>

00:01:46.429 --> 00:01:46.439 align:start position:0%
special purpose just because it's only
 

00:01:46.439 --> 00:01:49.490 align:start position:0%
special purpose just because it's only
for<00:01:46.680><c> payments</c><00:01:47.100><c> and</c><00:01:47.280><c> and</c><00:01:47.520><c> money</c><00:01:48.119><c> uh</c><00:01:49.079><c> ethereum</c>

00:01:49.490 --> 00:01:49.500 align:start position:0%
for payments and and money uh ethereum
 

00:01:49.500 --> 00:01:50.929 align:start position:0%
for payments and and money uh ethereum
the<00:01:49.740><c> very</c><00:01:49.920><c> first</c><00:01:50.100><c> a</c><00:01:50.399><c> general</c><00:01:50.579><c> purpose</c>

00:01:50.929 --> 00:01:50.939 align:start position:0%
the very first a general purpose
 

00:01:50.939 --> 00:01:53.330 align:start position:0%
the very first a general purpose
execution<00:01:51.360><c> chain</c><00:01:51.540><c> in</c><00:01:51.899><c> general</c><00:01:52.200><c> all</c><00:01:53.159><c> these</c>

00:01:53.330 --> 00:01:53.340 align:start position:0%
execution chain in general all these
 

00:01:53.340 --> 00:01:54.410 align:start position:0%
execution chain in general all these
chains<00:01:53.640><c> of</c><00:01:53.759><c> course</c><00:01:53.880><c> they</c><00:01:54.119><c> want</c><00:01:54.240><c> to</c><00:01:54.299><c> have</c>

00:01:54.410 --> 00:01:54.420 align:start position:0%
chains of course they want to have
 

00:01:54.420 --> 00:01:56.990 align:start position:0%
chains of course they want to have
maximum<00:01:54.780><c> functionality</c><00:01:55.200><c> maximum</c><00:01:55.680><c> throughput</c>

00:01:56.990 --> 00:01:57.000 align:start position:0%
maximum functionality maximum throughput
 

00:01:57.000 --> 00:01:59.149 align:start position:0%
maximum functionality maximum throughput
um<00:01:57.119><c> but</c><00:01:57.540><c> that</c><00:01:58.140><c> that's</c><00:01:58.380><c> attention</c><00:01:58.799><c> with</c>

00:01:59.149 --> 00:01:59.159 align:start position:0%
um but that that's attention with
 

00:01:59.159 --> 00:02:00.590 align:start position:0%
um but that that's attention with
needing<00:01:59.520><c> to</c><00:01:59.640><c> guarantee</c><00:01:59.939><c> security</c><00:02:00.240><c> and</c>

00:02:00.590 --> 00:02:00.600 align:start position:0%
needing to guarantee security and
 

00:02:00.600 --> 00:02:03.230 align:start position:0%
needing to guarantee security and
decentralization<00:02:01.439><c> and</c><00:02:02.399><c> to</c><00:02:02.700><c> illustrate</c><00:02:03.060><c> that</c>

00:02:03.230 --> 00:02:03.240 align:start position:0%
decentralization and to illustrate that
 

00:02:03.240 --> 00:02:04.850 align:start position:0%
decentralization and to illustrate that
kind<00:02:03.360><c> of</c><00:02:03.479><c> the</c><00:02:03.600><c> tension</c>

00:02:04.850 --> 00:02:04.860 align:start position:0%
kind of the tension
 

00:02:04.860 --> 00:02:07.249 align:start position:0%
kind of the tension
um I<00:02:05.340><c> created</c><00:02:05.640><c> this</c><00:02:05.880><c> little</c><00:02:06.119><c> uh</c><00:02:06.420><c> final</c><00:02:06.780><c> graph</c>

00:02:07.249 --> 00:02:07.259 align:start position:0%
um I created this little uh final graph
 

00:02:07.259 --> 00:02:09.669 align:start position:0%
um I created this little uh final graph
so<00:02:07.439><c> basically</c><00:02:07.740><c> uh</c><00:02:08.160><c> on</c><00:02:08.340><c> the</c><00:02:08.399><c> on</c><00:02:08.580><c> the</c>

00:02:09.669 --> 00:02:09.679 align:start position:0%
so basically uh on the on the
 

00:02:09.679 --> 00:02:11.809 align:start position:0%
so basically uh on the on the
x-axis<00:02:10.679><c> you</c><00:02:10.860><c> have</c><00:02:10.979><c> the</c><00:02:11.099><c> cost</c><00:02:11.220><c> to</c><00:02:11.400><c> run</c><00:02:11.520><c> a</c><00:02:11.700><c> full</c>

00:02:11.809 --> 00:02:11.819 align:start position:0%
x-axis you have the cost to run a full
 

00:02:11.819 --> 00:02:13.550 align:start position:0%
x-axis you have the cost to run a full
node<00:02:12.060><c> and</c><00:02:12.180><c> on</c><00:02:12.360><c> the</c><00:02:12.420><c> y-axis</c><00:02:12.780><c> you</c><00:02:12.959><c> have</c><00:02:13.080><c> the</c><00:02:13.200><c> the</c>

00:02:13.550 --> 00:02:13.560 align:start position:0%
node and on the y-axis you have the the
 

00:02:13.560 --> 00:02:16.010 align:start position:0%
node and on the y-axis you have the the
throughput<00:02:14.040><c> that</c><00:02:14.220><c> your</c><00:02:14.340><c> network</c><00:02:14.520><c> can</c><00:02:14.819><c> have</c>

00:02:16.010 --> 00:02:16.020 align:start position:0%
throughput that your network can have
 

00:02:16.020 --> 00:02:17.990 align:start position:0%
throughput that your network can have
um<00:02:16.140><c> and</c><00:02:16.500><c> with</c><00:02:16.620><c> the</c><00:02:16.860><c> Bitcoin</c><00:02:17.400><c> and</c><00:02:17.520><c> ethereum</c>

00:02:17.990 --> 00:02:18.000 align:start position:0%
um and with the Bitcoin and ethereum
 

00:02:18.000 --> 00:02:20.270 align:start position:0%
um and with the Bitcoin and ethereum
basically<00:02:18.420><c> uh</c><00:02:19.020><c> you</c><00:02:19.200><c> are</c><00:02:19.319><c> in</c><00:02:19.500><c> this</c><00:02:19.620><c> nice</c><00:02:19.860><c> Zone</c>

00:02:20.270 --> 00:02:20.280 align:start position:0%
basically uh you are in this nice Zone
 

00:02:20.280 --> 00:02:22.309 align:start position:0%
basically uh you are in this nice Zone
where<00:02:20.700><c> they're</c><00:02:21.420><c> down</c><00:02:21.660><c> there</c><00:02:21.780><c> where</c><00:02:22.020><c> basically</c>

00:02:22.309 --> 00:02:22.319 align:start position:0%
where they're down there where basically
 

00:02:22.319 --> 00:02:24.110 align:start position:0%
where they're down there where basically
everyone<00:02:22.500><c> wants</c><00:02:23.099><c> to</c><00:02:23.160><c> can</c><00:02:23.520><c> run</c><00:02:23.700><c> their</c><00:02:23.940><c> own</c>

00:02:24.110 --> 00:02:24.120 align:start position:0%
everyone wants to can run their own
 

00:02:24.120 --> 00:02:26.750 align:start position:0%
everyone wants to can run their own
chain<00:02:24.300><c> locally</c><00:02:24.959><c> I</c><00:02:25.800><c> don't</c><00:02:25.980><c> run</c><00:02:26.160><c> my</c><00:02:26.280><c> own</c><00:02:26.400><c> Bitcoin</c>

00:02:26.750 --> 00:02:26.760 align:start position:0%
chain locally I don't run my own Bitcoin
 

00:02:26.760 --> 00:02:28.610 align:start position:0%
chain locally I don't run my own Bitcoin
chain<00:02:26.879><c> right</c><00:02:27.120><c> okay</c><00:02:27.480><c> okay</c><00:02:27.599><c> so</c><00:02:28.020><c> it</c><00:02:28.140><c> is</c><00:02:28.260><c> Bitcoin</c>

00:02:28.610 --> 00:02:28.620 align:start position:0%
chain right okay okay so it is Bitcoin
 

00:02:28.620 --> 00:02:30.830 align:start position:0%
chain right okay okay so it is Bitcoin
but<00:02:28.739><c> I</c><00:02:28.920><c> could</c><00:02:29.099><c> it's</c><00:02:29.640><c> just</c><00:02:29.819><c> a</c><00:02:30.000><c> trust</c><00:02:30.300><c> trade-off</c>

00:02:30.830 --> 00:02:30.840 align:start position:0%
but I could it's just a trust trade-off
 

00:02:30.840 --> 00:02:33.350 align:start position:0%
but I could it's just a trust trade-off
that<00:02:31.080><c> I'm</c><00:02:31.319><c> I</c><00:02:31.560><c> choose</c><00:02:32.040><c> to</c><00:02:32.160><c> make</c>

00:02:33.350 --> 00:02:33.360 align:start position:0%
that I'm I choose to make
 

00:02:33.360 --> 00:02:35.030 align:start position:0%
that I'm I choose to make
um<00:02:33.420><c> but</c><00:02:33.720><c> that</c><00:02:33.840><c> does</c><00:02:34.020><c> mean</c><00:02:34.200><c> that</c><00:02:34.440><c> these</c><00:02:34.739><c> chains</c>

00:02:35.030 --> 00:02:35.040 align:start position:0%
um but that does mean that these chains
 

00:02:35.040 --> 00:02:36.650 align:start position:0%
um but that does mean that these chains
are<00:02:35.220><c> fundamentally</c><00:02:35.700><c> Limited</c><00:02:36.120><c> in</c><00:02:36.300><c> throughput</c>

00:02:36.650 --> 00:02:36.660 align:start position:0%
are fundamentally Limited in throughput
 

00:02:36.660 --> 00:02:40.010 align:start position:0%
are fundamentally Limited in throughput
right<00:02:36.900><c> by</c><00:02:37.260><c> by</c><00:02:37.920><c> uh</c><00:02:38.819><c> basically</c><00:02:39.540><c> the</c><00:02:39.720><c> minimum</c>

00:02:40.010 --> 00:02:40.020 align:start position:0%
right by by uh basically the minimum
 

00:02:40.020 --> 00:02:42.589 align:start position:0%
right by by uh basically the minimum
consumer<00:02:40.680><c> Hardware</c><00:02:40.879><c> capabilities</c><00:02:41.879><c> and</c><00:02:42.300><c> and</c>

00:02:42.589 --> 00:02:42.599 align:start position:0%
consumer Hardware capabilities and and
 

00:02:42.599 --> 00:02:44.270 align:start position:0%
consumer Hardware capabilities and and
kind<00:02:42.900><c> of</c><00:02:43.019><c> the</c><00:02:43.080><c> key</c><00:02:43.379><c> Insight</c><00:02:43.680><c> you</c><00:02:43.860><c> release</c><00:02:44.040><c> that</c>

00:02:44.270 --> 00:02:44.280 align:start position:0%
kind of the key Insight you release that
 

00:02:44.280 --> 00:02:45.830 align:start position:0%
kind of the key Insight you release that
like<00:02:44.459><c> everyone</c><00:02:44.700><c> validating</c><00:02:45.300><c> everyone's</c>

00:02:45.830 --> 00:02:45.840 align:start position:0%
like everyone validating everyone's
 

00:02:45.840 --> 00:02:47.509 align:start position:0%
like everyone validating everyone's
transaction<00:02:46.140><c> doesn't</c><00:02:46.440><c> scale</c>

00:02:47.509 --> 00:02:47.519 align:start position:0%
transaction doesn't scale
 

00:02:47.519 --> 00:02:50.030 align:start position:0%
transaction doesn't scale
but<00:02:48.120><c> of</c><00:02:48.300><c> course</c><00:02:48.480><c> we</c><00:02:49.019><c> we</c><00:02:49.200><c> don't</c><00:02:49.620><c> want</c><00:02:49.739><c> to</c><00:02:49.860><c> give</c>

00:02:50.030 --> 00:02:50.040 align:start position:0%
but of course we we don't want to give
 

00:02:50.040 --> 00:02:51.830 align:start position:0%
but of course we we don't want to give
up<00:02:50.280><c> you</c><00:02:50.580><c> know</c><00:02:50.700><c> security</c><00:02:50.879><c> by</c><00:02:51.300><c> by</c><00:02:51.540><c> kind</c><00:02:51.780><c> of</c>

00:02:51.830 --> 00:02:51.840 align:start position:0%
up you know security by by kind of
 

00:02:51.840 --> 00:02:53.150 align:start position:0%
up you know security by by kind of
moving<00:02:52.140><c> beyond</c><00:02:52.379><c> this</c><00:02:52.500><c> so</c><00:02:52.739><c> like</c><00:02:52.860><c> the</c><00:02:53.040><c> very</c>

00:02:53.150 --> 00:02:53.160 align:start position:0%
moving beyond this so like the very
 

00:02:53.160 --> 00:02:55.369 align:start position:0%
moving beyond this so like the very
first<00:02:53.400><c> thing</c><00:02:53.580><c> you</c><00:02:53.760><c> could</c><00:02:53.879><c> do</c><00:02:54.000><c> and</c><00:02:54.300><c> I</c><00:02:54.900><c> I</c><00:02:55.140><c> picked</c>

00:02:55.369 --> 00:02:55.379 align:start position:0%
first thing you could do and I I picked
 

00:02:55.379 --> 00:02:57.110 align:start position:0%
first thing you could do and I I picked
Solana<00:02:55.739><c> just</c><00:02:55.920><c> as</c><00:02:56.040><c> an</c><00:02:56.160><c> example</c><00:02:56.459><c> and</c><00:02:56.640><c> this</c><00:02:56.940><c> is</c>

00:02:57.110 --> 00:02:57.120 align:start position:0%
Solana just as an example and this is
 

00:02:57.120 --> 00:02:58.790 align:start position:0%
Solana just as an example and this is
not<00:02:57.180><c> meant</c><00:02:57.480><c> as</c><00:02:57.540><c> a</c><00:02:57.720><c> slide</c><00:02:57.900><c> at</c><00:02:58.080><c> all</c><00:02:58.200><c> actually</c><00:02:58.500><c> I</c>

00:02:58.790 --> 00:02:58.800 align:start position:0%
not meant as a slide at all actually I
 

00:02:58.800 --> 00:03:01.670 align:start position:0%
not meant as a slide at all actually I
think<00:02:58.980><c> uh</c><00:02:59.519><c> in</c><00:02:59.760><c> a</c><00:03:00.000><c> second</c><00:03:00.120><c> you'll</c><00:03:00.540><c> uh</c><00:03:01.140><c> kind</c><00:03:01.560><c> of</c>

00:03:01.670 --> 00:03:01.680 align:start position:0%
think uh in a second you'll uh kind of
 

00:03:01.680 --> 00:03:03.830 align:start position:0%
think uh in a second you'll uh kind of
see<00:03:01.800><c> how</c><00:03:02.160><c> in</c><00:03:02.580><c> a</c><00:03:02.700><c> way</c><00:03:02.819><c> they're</c><00:03:03.120><c> kind</c><00:03:03.300><c> of</c><00:03:03.420><c> moving</c>

00:03:03.830 --> 00:03:03.840 align:start position:0%
see how in a way they're kind of moving
 

00:03:03.840 --> 00:03:05.750 align:start position:0%
see how in a way they're kind of moving
in<00:03:04.019><c> an</c><00:03:04.379><c> interesting</c><00:03:04.800><c> Direction</c><00:03:04.920><c> here</c><00:03:05.340><c> but</c><00:03:05.519><c> but</c>

00:03:05.750 --> 00:03:05.760 align:start position:0%
in an interesting Direction here but but
 

00:03:05.760 --> 00:03:07.850 align:start position:0%
in an interesting Direction here but but
basically<00:03:06.180><c> what</c><00:03:06.360><c> they're</c><00:03:06.660><c> doing</c><00:03:06.900><c> what</c><00:03:07.200><c> their</c>

00:03:07.850 --> 00:03:07.860 align:start position:0%
basically what they're doing what their
 

00:03:07.860 --> 00:03:09.830 align:start position:0%
basically what they're doing what their
version<00:03:08.280><c> of</c><00:03:08.519><c> scaling</c><00:03:09.000><c> is</c><00:03:09.120><c> just</c><00:03:09.360><c> to</c><00:03:09.480><c> basically</c>

00:03:09.830 --> 00:03:09.840 align:start position:0%
version of scaling is just to basically
 

00:03:09.840 --> 00:03:12.350 align:start position:0%
version of scaling is just to basically
go<00:03:10.080><c> further</c><00:03:10.500><c> up</c><00:03:10.680><c> this</c><00:03:10.920><c> diagonal</c>

00:03:12.350 --> 00:03:12.360 align:start position:0%
go further up this diagonal
 

00:03:12.360 --> 00:03:14.270 align:start position:0%
go further up this diagonal
um<00:03:12.480><c> and</c><00:03:13.200><c> that</c><00:03:13.620><c> does</c><00:03:13.739><c> give</c><00:03:13.920><c> you</c><00:03:14.040><c> a</c><00:03:14.099><c> higher</c>

00:03:14.270 --> 00:03:14.280 align:start position:0%
um and that does give you a higher
 

00:03:14.280 --> 00:03:15.770 align:start position:0%
um and that does give you a higher
throughput<00:03:14.580><c> but</c><00:03:14.819><c> of</c><00:03:14.940><c> course</c><00:03:15.060><c> it</c><00:03:15.239><c> means</c><00:03:15.540><c> that</c>

00:03:15.770 --> 00:03:15.780 align:start position:0%
throughput but of course it means that
 

00:03:15.780 --> 00:03:18.649 align:start position:0%
throughput but of course it means that
now<00:03:16.080><c> running</c><00:03:16.800><c> a</c><00:03:17.159><c> full</c><00:03:17.280><c> node</c><00:03:17.640><c> is</c><00:03:17.879><c> it</c><00:03:18.180><c> becomes</c>

00:03:18.649 --> 00:03:18.659 align:start position:0%
now running a full node is it becomes
 

00:03:18.659 --> 00:03:20.390 align:start position:0%
now running a full node is it becomes
really<00:03:18.840><c> expensive</c><00:03:19.379><c> so</c><00:03:19.680><c> that's</c><00:03:19.800><c> one</c><00:03:20.040><c> way</c><00:03:20.220><c> of</c>

00:03:20.390 --> 00:03:20.400 align:start position:0%
really expensive so that's one way of
 

00:03:20.400 --> 00:03:22.970 align:start position:0%
really expensive so that's one way of
just<00:03:20.580><c> increasing</c><00:03:21.060><c> a</c><00:03:21.840><c> throughput</c><00:03:22.319><c> the</c><00:03:22.800><c> problem</c>

00:03:22.970 --> 00:03:22.980 align:start position:0%
just increasing a throughput the problem
 

00:03:22.980 --> 00:03:24.710 align:start position:0%
just increasing a throughput the problem
is<00:03:23.220><c> what</c><00:03:23.580><c> if</c><00:03:23.760><c> you</c><00:03:23.879><c> don't</c><00:03:24.000><c> run</c><00:03:24.239><c> your</c><00:03:24.420><c> own</c><00:03:24.540><c> full</c>

00:03:24.710 --> 00:03:24.720 align:start position:0%
is what if you don't run your own full
 

00:03:24.720 --> 00:03:25.850 align:start position:0%
is what if you don't run your own full
node<00:03:25.080><c> and</c><00:03:25.260><c> there's</c><00:03:25.440><c> some</c><00:03:25.680><c> sort</c><00:03:25.800><c> of</c>

00:03:25.850 --> 00:03:25.860 align:start position:0%
node and there's some sort of
 

00:03:25.860 --> 00:03:27.589 align:start position:0%
node and there's some sort of
disagreement<00:03:26.340><c> right</c><00:03:26.640><c> some</c><00:03:26.940><c> some</c><00:03:27.120><c> malicious</c>

00:03:27.589 --> 00:03:27.599 align:start position:0%
disagreement right some some malicious
 

00:03:27.599 --> 00:03:30.589 align:start position:0%
disagreement right some some malicious
attack<00:03:27.780><c> some</c><00:03:28.319><c> some</c><00:03:28.620><c> chain</c><00:03:29.159><c> Fork</c><00:03:29.580><c> uh</c><00:03:30.300><c> you</c><00:03:30.480><c> only</c>

00:03:30.589 --> 00:03:30.599 align:start position:0%
attack some some chain Fork uh you only
 

00:03:30.599 --> 00:03:31.910 align:start position:0%
attack some some chain Fork uh you only
have<00:03:30.780><c> two</c><00:03:30.900><c> choices</c><00:03:31.080><c> either</c><00:03:31.319><c> you</c><00:03:31.560><c> go</c><00:03:31.620><c> with</c><00:03:31.739><c> a</c>

00:03:31.910 --> 00:03:31.920 align:start position:0%
have two choices either you go with a
 

00:03:31.920 --> 00:03:34.190 align:start position:0%
have two choices either you go with a
majority<00:03:32.220><c> in</c><00:03:32.640><c> which</c><00:03:32.760><c> case</c><00:03:33.000><c> 51</c><00:03:33.599><c> of</c><00:03:33.959><c> the</c><00:03:34.080><c> network</c>

00:03:34.190 --> 00:03:34.200 align:start position:0%
majority in which case 51 of the network
 

00:03:34.200 --> 00:03:35.869 align:start position:0%
majority in which case 51 of the network
can<00:03:34.500><c> always</c><00:03:34.620><c> rewrite</c><00:03:34.980><c> all</c><00:03:35.220><c> the</c><00:03:35.400><c> rules</c><00:03:35.580><c> take</c>

00:03:35.869 --> 00:03:35.879 align:start position:0%
can always rewrite all the rules take
 

00:03:35.879 --> 00:03:37.970 align:start position:0%
can always rewrite all the rules take
away<00:03:36.000><c> your</c><00:03:36.239><c> money</c><00:03:36.420><c> everything</c><00:03:36.720><c> right</c><00:03:37.080><c> all</c><00:03:37.800><c> the</c>

00:03:37.970 --> 00:03:37.980 align:start position:0%
away your money everything right all the
 

00:03:37.980 --> 00:03:39.110 align:start position:0%
away your money everything right all the
other<00:03:38.159><c> the</c><00:03:38.459><c> other</c><00:03:38.519><c> thing</c><00:03:38.640><c> you</c><00:03:38.819><c> can</c><00:03:38.940><c> of</c><00:03:39.060><c> course</c>

00:03:39.110 --> 00:03:39.120 align:start position:0%
other the other thing you can of course
 

00:03:39.120 --> 00:03:41.270 align:start position:0%
other the other thing you can of course
do<00:03:39.360><c> is</c><00:03:39.480><c> how</c><00:03:39.720><c> Halt</c><00:03:40.200><c> and</c><00:03:40.379><c> recover</c><00:03:40.860><c> via</c><00:03:41.159><c> the</c>

00:03:41.270 --> 00:03:41.280 align:start position:0%
do is how Halt and recover via the
 

00:03:41.280 --> 00:03:43.369 align:start position:0%
do is how Halt and recover via the
social<00:03:41.400><c> layer</c><00:03:41.819><c> but</c><00:03:42.000><c> that's</c>

00:03:43.369 --> 00:03:43.379 align:start position:0%
social layer but that's
 

00:03:43.379 --> 00:03:45.830 align:start position:0%
social layer but that's
um<00:03:43.440><c> very</c><00:03:43.860><c> slow</c><00:03:44.099><c> of</c><00:03:44.459><c> course</c><00:03:44.580><c> so</c><00:03:45.299><c> whether</c><00:03:45.659><c> we</c>

00:03:45.830 --> 00:03:45.840 align:start position:0%
um very slow of course so whether we
 

00:03:45.840 --> 00:03:48.350 align:start position:0%
um very slow of course so whether we
want<00:03:46.019><c> to</c><00:03:46.319><c> end</c><00:03:46.500><c> up</c><00:03:46.680><c> on</c><00:03:47.280><c> that</c><00:03:47.459><c> graph</c><00:03:48.120><c> that's</c>

00:03:48.350 --> 00:03:48.360 align:start position:0%
want to end up on that graph that's
 

00:03:48.360 --> 00:03:50.570 align:start position:0%
want to end up on that graph that's
basically<00:03:48.720><c> this</c><00:03:49.080><c> what</c><00:03:49.560><c> I</c><00:03:49.860><c> call</c><00:03:50.040><c> the</c><00:03:50.220><c> Unicorn</c>

00:03:50.570 --> 00:03:50.580 align:start position:0%
basically this what I call the Unicorn
 

00:03:50.580 --> 00:03:54.949 align:start position:0%
basically this what I call the Unicorn
Zone<00:03:50.879><c> up</c><00:03:51.239><c> there</c><00:03:51.680><c> where</c><00:03:52.680><c> everyone</c><00:03:53.519><c> could</c><00:03:54.480><c> you</c>

00:03:54.949 --> 00:03:54.959 align:start position:0%
Zone up there where everyone could you
 

00:03:54.959 --> 00:03:56.330 align:start position:0%
Zone up there where everyone could you
know<00:03:55.200><c> trustlessly</c><00:03:55.680><c> validate</c><00:03:56.099><c> the</c><00:03:56.220><c> network</c>

00:03:56.330 --> 00:03:56.340 align:start position:0%
know trustlessly validate the network
 

00:03:56.340 --> 00:03:58.009 align:start position:0%
know trustlessly validate the network
but<00:03:56.640><c> we</c><00:03:56.819><c> still</c><00:03:57.000><c> have</c><00:03:57.180><c> like</c><00:03:57.360><c> really</c><00:03:57.780><c> high</c>

00:03:58.009 --> 00:03:58.019 align:start position:0%
but we still have like really high
 

00:03:58.019 --> 00:03:59.630 align:start position:0%
but we still have like really high
throughput

00:03:59.630 --> 00:03:59.640 align:start position:0%
throughput
 

00:03:59.640 --> 00:04:02.990 align:start position:0%
throughput
um<00:03:59.700><c> so</c><00:04:00.060><c> how</c><00:04:00.599><c> how</c><00:04:00.840><c> can</c><00:04:01.319><c> we</c><00:04:01.440><c> basically</c><00:04:01.799><c> find</c><00:04:02.760><c> a</c>

00:04:02.990 --> 00:04:03.000 align:start position:0%
um so how how can we basically find a
 

00:04:03.000 --> 00:04:05.089 align:start position:0%
um so how how can we basically find a
way<00:04:03.180><c> to</c><00:04:03.420><c> to</c><00:04:03.659><c> to</c><00:04:03.780><c> get</c><00:04:04.319><c> there</c>

00:04:05.089 --> 00:04:05.099 align:start position:0%
way to to to get there
 

00:04:05.099 --> 00:04:07.369 align:start position:0%
way to to to get there
um<00:04:05.700><c> and</c><00:04:06.120><c> and</c><00:04:06.120><c> that's</c><00:04:06.480><c> basically</c><00:04:06.780><c> where</c><00:04:06.959><c> roll</c>

00:04:07.369 --> 00:04:07.379 align:start position:0%
um and and that's basically where roll
 

00:04:07.379 --> 00:04:09.170 align:start position:0%
um and and that's basically where roll
ups<00:04:07.680><c> come</c><00:04:07.860><c> in</c><00:04:07.980><c> and</c><00:04:08.159><c> why</c><00:04:08.340><c> do</c><00:04:08.519><c> Roll-Ups</c><00:04:08.940><c> come</c><00:04:09.060><c> in</c>

00:04:09.170 --> 00:04:09.180 align:start position:0%
ups come in and why do Roll-Ups come in
 

00:04:09.180 --> 00:04:11.509 align:start position:0%
ups come in and why do Roll-Ups come in
there<00:04:09.780><c> um</c><00:04:09.840><c> to</c><00:04:10.019><c> explain</c><00:04:10.140><c> that</c><00:04:10.500><c> as</c><00:04:11.099><c> you</c><00:04:11.280><c> might</c><00:04:11.400><c> be</c>

00:04:11.509 --> 00:04:11.519 align:start position:0%
there um to explain that as you might be
 

00:04:11.519 --> 00:04:12.890 align:start position:0%
there um to explain that as you might be
aware<00:04:11.700><c> you</c><00:04:12.060><c> probably</c><00:04:12.180><c> are</c><00:04:12.360><c> aware</c><00:04:12.540><c> there</c><00:04:12.780><c> are</c>

00:04:12.890 --> 00:04:12.900 align:start position:0%
aware you probably are aware there are
 

00:04:12.900 --> 00:04:14.449 align:start position:0%
aware you probably are aware there are
like<00:04:13.019><c> two</c><00:04:13.140><c> different</c><00:04:13.379><c> flavors</c><00:04:13.799><c> of</c><00:04:13.920><c> Roll-Ups</c>

00:04:14.449 --> 00:04:14.459 align:start position:0%
like two different flavors of Roll-Ups
 

00:04:14.459 --> 00:04:17.150 align:start position:0%
like two different flavors of Roll-Ups
optimistic<00:04:15.299><c> and</c><00:04:15.420><c> ZK</c><00:04:15.659><c> Roll-Ups</c><00:04:16.199><c> the</c><00:04:16.680><c> easier</c><00:04:16.979><c> to</c>

00:04:17.150 --> 00:04:17.160 align:start position:0%
optimistic and ZK Roll-Ups the easier to
 

00:04:17.160 --> 00:04:18.590 align:start position:0%
optimistic and ZK Roll-Ups the easier to
explain<00:04:17.280><c> in</c><00:04:17.519><c> this</c><00:04:17.639><c> context</c><00:04:17.880><c> is</c><00:04:18.060><c> optimistic</c>

00:04:18.590 --> 00:04:18.600 align:start position:0%
explain in this context is optimistic
 

00:04:18.600 --> 00:04:21.469 align:start position:0%
explain in this context is optimistic
rollups<00:04:19.139><c> so</c><00:04:19.260><c> uh</c><00:04:20.100><c> to</c><00:04:20.280><c> talk</c><00:04:20.519><c> basically</c><00:04:21.000><c> to</c><00:04:21.299><c> to</c>

00:04:21.469 --> 00:04:21.479 align:start position:0%
rollups so uh to talk basically to to
 

00:04:21.479 --> 00:04:23.270 align:start position:0%
rollups so uh to talk basically to to
kind<00:04:21.780><c> of</c><00:04:21.900><c> get</c><00:04:22.079><c> any</c><00:04:22.199><c> tuition</c><00:04:22.500><c> for</c><00:04:22.860><c> for</c><00:04:23.040><c> how</c>

00:04:23.270 --> 00:04:23.280 align:start position:0%
kind of get any tuition for for how
 

00:04:23.280 --> 00:04:24.950 align:start position:0%
kind of get any tuition for for how
optimistic<00:04:23.820><c> will</c><00:04:23.940><c> have</c><00:04:24.180><c> solve</c><00:04:24.479><c> this</c><00:04:24.660><c> this</c>

00:04:24.950 --> 00:04:24.960 align:start position:0%
optimistic will have solve this this
 

00:04:24.960 --> 00:04:27.590 align:start position:0%
optimistic will have solve this this
kind<00:04:25.259><c> of</c><00:04:25.380><c> this</c><00:04:25.620><c> dilemma</c><00:04:26.160><c> here</c><00:04:26.340><c> and</c><00:04:27.180><c> we</c><00:04:27.479><c> can</c>

00:04:27.590 --> 00:04:27.600 align:start position:0%
kind of this dilemma here and we can
 

00:04:27.600 --> 00:04:29.270 align:start position:0%
kind of this dilemma here and we can
look<00:04:28.139><c> look</c><00:04:28.320><c> again</c><00:04:28.560><c> at</c><00:04:28.800><c> the</c><00:04:28.860><c> at</c><00:04:28.979><c> the</c><00:04:29.160><c> Savannah</c>

00:04:29.270 --> 00:04:29.280 align:start position:0%
look look again at the at the Savannah
 

00:04:29.280 --> 00:04:31.370 align:start position:0%
look look again at the at the Savannah
case<00:04:29.699><c> and</c><00:04:29.880><c> as</c><00:04:30.120><c> I</c><00:04:30.300><c> was</c><00:04:30.419><c> talking</c><00:04:30.600><c> about</c><00:04:30.780><c> right</c><00:04:31.080><c> if</c>

00:04:31.370 --> 00:04:31.380 align:start position:0%
case and as I was talking about right if
 

00:04:31.380 --> 00:04:33.650 align:start position:0%
case and as I was talking about right if
if<00:04:31.860><c> there's</c><00:04:32.340><c> a</c><00:04:32.520><c> disagreement</c><00:04:33.000><c> and</c><00:04:33.300><c> even</c><00:04:33.419><c> if</c>

00:04:33.650 --> 00:04:33.660 align:start position:0%
if there's a disagreement and even if
 

00:04:33.660 --> 00:04:35.629 align:start position:0%
if there's a disagreement and even if
you<00:04:33.780><c> don't</c><00:04:33.960><c> run</c><00:04:34.500><c> your</c><00:04:34.620><c> own</c><00:04:34.800><c> full</c><00:04:34.979><c> node</c><00:04:35.280><c> you</c>

00:04:35.629 --> 00:04:35.639 align:start position:0%
you don't run your own full node you
 

00:04:35.639 --> 00:04:37.850 align:start position:0%
you don't run your own full node you
always<00:04:35.820><c> have</c><00:04:36.000><c> the</c><00:04:36.180><c> of</c><00:04:36.419><c> the</c><00:04:37.139><c> option</c><00:04:37.440><c> to</c><00:04:37.620><c> just</c>

00:04:37.850 --> 00:04:37.860 align:start position:0%
always have the of the option to just
 

00:04:37.860 --> 00:04:40.670 align:start position:0%
always have the of the option to just
Halt<00:04:38.340><c> and</c><00:04:38.520><c> recover</c><00:04:38.820><c> by</c><00:04:39.060><c> the</c><00:04:39.300><c> social</c><00:04:39.780><c> layer</c><00:04:40.199><c> and</c>

00:04:40.670 --> 00:04:40.680 align:start position:0%
Halt and recover by the social layer and
 

00:04:40.680 --> 00:04:42.409 align:start position:0%
Halt and recover by the social layer and
the<00:04:40.800><c> optimistic</c><00:04:41.280><c> roll-up</c><00:04:41.639><c> kind</c><00:04:41.820><c> of</c><00:04:41.940><c> idea</c><00:04:42.240><c> here</c>

00:04:42.409 --> 00:04:42.419 align:start position:0%
the optimistic roll-up kind of idea here
 

00:04:42.419 --> 00:04:44.749 align:start position:0%
the optimistic roll-up kind of idea here
is<00:04:42.600><c> what</c><00:04:43.020><c> if</c><00:04:43.199><c> we</c><00:04:43.320><c> could</c><00:04:43.500><c> just</c><00:04:43.740><c> massively</c><00:04:44.520><c> speed</c>

00:04:44.749 --> 00:04:44.759 align:start position:0%
is what if we could just massively speed
 

00:04:44.759 --> 00:04:47.210 align:start position:0%
is what if we could just massively speed
that<00:04:45.000><c> up</c><00:04:45.120><c> right</c><00:04:45.360><c> instead</c><00:04:45.660><c> of</c><00:04:45.780><c> running</c><00:04:46.220><c> that</c>

00:04:47.210 --> 00:04:47.220 align:start position:0%
that up right instead of running that
 

00:04:47.220 --> 00:04:48.170 align:start position:0%
that up right instead of running that
kind<00:04:47.520><c> of</c>

00:04:48.170 --> 00:04:48.180 align:start position:0%
kind of
 

00:04:48.180 --> 00:04:49.909 align:start position:0%
kind of
um<00:04:48.300><c> this</c><00:04:48.540><c> this</c><00:04:48.660><c> fallback</c><00:04:49.020><c> mechanism</c><00:04:49.500><c> on</c><00:04:49.740><c> human</c>

00:04:49.909 --> 00:04:49.919 align:start position:0%
um this this fallback mechanism on human
 

00:04:49.919 --> 00:04:51.950 align:start position:0%
um this this fallback mechanism on human
brains<00:04:50.460><c> where</c><00:04:51.060><c> whenever</c><00:04:51.479><c> something</c><00:04:51.720><c> goes</c>

00:04:51.950 --> 00:04:51.960 align:start position:0%
brains where whenever something goes
 

00:04:51.960 --> 00:04:52.909 align:start position:0%
brains where whenever something goes
wrong<00:04:52.020><c> you</c><00:04:52.199><c> have</c><00:04:52.320><c> to</c><00:04:52.380><c> actually</c><00:04:52.500><c> go</c><00:04:52.680><c> on</c><00:04:52.740><c> Twitter</c>

00:04:52.909 --> 00:04:52.919 align:start position:0%
wrong you have to actually go on Twitter
 

00:04:52.919 --> 00:04:55.550 align:start position:0%
wrong you have to actually go on Twitter
and<00:04:53.100><c> whatnot</c><00:04:53.460><c> what</c><00:04:54.000><c> if</c><00:04:54.240><c> we</c><00:04:54.780><c> basically</c><00:04:55.199><c> just</c>

00:04:55.550 --> 00:04:55.560 align:start position:0%
and whatnot what if we basically just
 

00:04:55.560 --> 00:04:57.710 align:start position:0%
and whatnot what if we basically just
automate<00:04:56.220><c> that</c><00:04:56.400><c> right</c><00:04:56.639><c> like</c><00:04:56.940><c> we</c><00:04:57.240><c> replace</c><00:04:57.479><c> the</c>

00:04:57.710 --> 00:04:57.720 align:start position:0%
automate that right like we replace the
 

00:04:57.720 --> 00:05:00.770 align:start position:0%
automate that right like we replace the
human<00:04:57.840><c> brain</c><00:04:58.199><c> with</c><00:04:58.380><c> uh</c><00:04:58.800><c> with</c><00:04:59.040><c> software</c><00:04:59.460><c> and</c><00:05:00.419><c> in</c>

00:05:00.770 --> 00:05:00.780 align:start position:0%
human brain with uh with software and in
 

00:05:00.780 --> 00:05:03.409 align:start position:0%
human brain with uh with software and in
particular<00:05:01.080><c> with</c><00:05:01.320><c> fraud</c><00:05:01.919><c> proofs</c><00:05:02.280><c> and</c><00:05:02.639><c> and</c>

00:05:03.409 --> 00:05:03.419 align:start position:0%
particular with fraud proofs and and
 

00:05:03.419 --> 00:05:04.730 align:start position:0%
particular with fraud proofs and and
um<00:05:03.479><c> and</c><00:05:03.780><c> that's</c><00:05:03.900><c> how</c><00:05:04.139><c> you</c><00:05:04.259><c> how</c><00:05:04.440><c> you</c><00:05:04.620><c> get</c>

00:05:04.730 --> 00:05:04.740 align:start position:0%
um and that's how you how you get
 

00:05:04.740 --> 00:05:07.550 align:start position:0%
um and that's how you how you get
optimistic<00:05:05.460><c> growth</c><00:05:05.639><c> so</c><00:05:06.300><c> kind</c><00:05:06.960><c> of</c><00:05:07.080><c> trying</c><00:05:07.380><c> to</c>

00:05:07.550 --> 00:05:07.560 align:start position:0%
optimistic growth so kind of trying to
 

00:05:07.560 --> 00:05:08.810 align:start position:0%
optimistic growth so kind of trying to
keep<00:05:07.680><c> with</c><00:05:07.860><c> my</c><00:05:08.040><c> little</c><00:05:08.160><c> picture</c><00:05:08.460><c> some</c>

00:05:08.810 --> 00:05:08.820 align:start position:0%
keep with my little picture some
 

00:05:08.820 --> 00:05:11.450 align:start position:0%
keep with my little picture some
symbolism<00:05:09.720><c> so</c><00:05:10.020><c> so</c><00:05:10.320><c> their</c><00:05:10.620><c> optimistic</c><00:05:11.160><c> rollups</c>

00:05:11.450 --> 00:05:11.460 align:start position:0%
symbolism so so their optimistic rollups
 

00:05:11.460 --> 00:05:13.010 align:start position:0%
symbolism so so their optimistic rollups
are<00:05:11.520><c> also</c><00:05:11.699><c> basically</c><00:05:12.000><c> a</c><00:05:12.240><c> form</c><00:05:12.419><c> of</c><00:05:12.600><c> an</c>

00:05:13.010 --> 00:05:13.020 align:start position:0%
are also basically a form of an
 

00:05:13.020 --> 00:05:14.150 align:start position:0%
are also basically a form of an
execution<00:05:13.320><c> chain</c><00:05:13.560><c> they</c><00:05:13.860><c> are</c><00:05:13.979><c> their</c><00:05:14.100><c> own</c>

00:05:14.150 --> 00:05:14.160 align:start position:0%
execution chain they are their own
 

00:05:14.160 --> 00:05:15.950 align:start position:0%
execution chain they are their own
blockchains<00:05:14.759><c> basically</c>

00:05:15.950 --> 00:05:15.960 align:start position:0%
blockchains basically
 

00:05:15.960 --> 00:05:17.450 align:start position:0%
blockchains basically
um<00:05:16.020><c> the</c><00:05:16.259><c> way</c><00:05:16.380><c> they</c><00:05:16.560><c> work</c><00:05:16.740><c> is</c><00:05:16.860><c> that</c><00:05:17.040><c> they</c><00:05:17.160><c> apply</c>

00:05:17.450 --> 00:05:17.460 align:start position:0%
um the way they work is that they apply
 

00:05:17.460 --> 00:05:19.670 align:start position:0%
um the way they work is that they apply
the<00:05:17.639><c> changes</c><00:05:18.000><c> optimistically</c>

00:05:19.670 --> 00:05:19.680 align:start position:0%
the changes optimistically
 

00:05:19.680 --> 00:05:21.770 align:start position:0%
the changes optimistically
um<00:05:19.740><c> and</c><00:05:20.100><c> anyone</c><00:05:20.400><c> can</c><00:05:20.580><c> submit</c><00:05:20.940><c> a</c><00:05:21.060><c> fraud</c><00:05:21.360><c> proof</c>

00:05:21.770 --> 00:05:21.780 align:start position:0%
um and anyone can submit a fraud proof
 

00:05:21.780 --> 00:05:23.990 align:start position:0%
um and anyone can submit a fraud proof
uh<00:05:22.380><c> so</c><00:05:22.500><c> so</c><00:05:22.800><c> the</c><00:05:23.100><c> only</c><00:05:23.220><c> basically</c><00:05:23.580><c> the</c><00:05:23.820><c> only</c>

00:05:23.990 --> 00:05:24.000 align:start position:0%
uh so so the only basically the only
 

00:05:24.000 --> 00:05:25.550 align:start position:0%
uh so so the only basically the only
guarantee<00:05:24.300><c> you</c><00:05:24.419><c> need</c><00:05:24.600><c> is</c><00:05:24.720><c> that</c><00:05:24.900><c> there's</c>

00:05:25.550 --> 00:05:25.560 align:start position:0%
guarantee you need is that there's
 

00:05:25.560 --> 00:05:27.770 align:start position:0%
guarantee you need is that there's
someone<00:05:25.860><c> in</c><00:05:26.220><c> the</c><00:05:26.340><c> system</c><00:05:26.520><c> that</c><00:05:27.000><c> notices</c><00:05:27.479><c> if</c>

00:05:27.770 --> 00:05:27.780 align:start position:0%
someone in the system that notices if
 

00:05:27.780 --> 00:05:29.810 align:start position:0%
someone in the system that notices if
something<00:05:27.960><c> goes</c><00:05:28.560><c> wrong</c><00:05:28.680><c> but</c><00:05:28.979><c> one</c><00:05:29.520><c> of</c><00:05:29.639><c> and</c>

00:05:29.810 --> 00:05:29.820 align:start position:0%
something goes wrong but one of and
 

00:05:29.820 --> 00:05:32.330 align:start position:0%
something goes wrong but one of and
honesty<00:05:30.300><c> assumption</c><00:05:30.600><c> is</c><00:05:30.780><c> a</c><00:05:31.020><c> way</c><00:05:31.199><c> way</c><00:05:31.380><c> way</c><00:05:31.440><c> less</c>

00:05:32.330 --> 00:05:32.340 align:start position:0%
honesty assumption is a way way way less
 

00:05:32.340 --> 00:05:34.070 align:start position:0%
honesty assumption is a way way way less
severe<00:05:32.759><c> restriction</c><00:05:33.060><c> than</c><00:05:33.360><c> a</c><00:05:33.600><c> majority</c>

00:05:34.070 --> 00:05:34.080 align:start position:0%
severe restriction than a majority
 

00:05:34.080 --> 00:05:35.749 align:start position:0%
severe restriction than a majority
honesty<00:05:34.560><c> assumption</c>

00:05:35.749 --> 00:05:35.759 align:start position:0%
honesty assumption
 

00:05:35.759 --> 00:05:37.070 align:start position:0%
honesty assumption
um<00:05:35.820><c> and</c><00:05:36.000><c> then</c><00:05:36.060><c> these</c><00:05:36.300><c> photos</c><00:05:36.479><c> they</c><00:05:36.900><c> are</c>

00:05:37.070 --> 00:05:37.080 align:start position:0%
um and then these photos they are
 

00:05:37.080 --> 00:05:38.510 align:start position:0%
um and then these photos they are
automatically<00:05:37.500><c> resolved</c><00:05:37.979><c> on</c><00:05:38.100><c> some</c><00:05:38.280><c> sort</c><00:05:38.400><c> of</c>

00:05:38.510 --> 00:05:38.520 align:start position:0%
automatically resolved on some sort of
 

00:05:38.520 --> 00:05:40.430 align:start position:0%
automatically resolved on some sort of
settlement<00:05:38.820><c> platform</c>

00:05:40.430 --> 00:05:40.440 align:start position:0%
settlement platform
 

00:05:40.440 --> 00:05:42.469 align:start position:0%
settlement platform
um<00:05:40.500><c> yeah</c><00:05:41.280><c> that</c><00:05:41.580><c> you</c><00:05:41.940><c> need</c><00:05:42.060><c> and</c><00:05:42.180><c> then</c><00:05:42.300><c> the</c>

00:05:42.469 --> 00:05:42.479 align:start position:0%
um yeah that you need and then the
 

00:05:42.479 --> 00:05:44.270 align:start position:0%
um yeah that you need and then the
alternative<00:05:42.900><c> as</c><00:05:43.080><c> I</c><00:05:43.199><c> was</c><00:05:43.259><c> saying</c><00:05:43.380><c> ZK</c><00:05:43.680><c> Roll-Ups</c>

00:05:44.270 --> 00:05:44.280 align:start position:0%
alternative as I was saying ZK Roll-Ups
 

00:05:44.280 --> 00:05:46.370 align:start position:0%
alternative as I was saying ZK Roll-Ups
they<00:05:44.759><c> are</c><00:05:44.940><c> just</c><00:05:45.060><c> cryptographic</c><00:05:45.900><c> magic</c><00:05:46.080><c> right</c>

00:05:46.370 --> 00:05:46.380 align:start position:0%
they are just cryptographic magic right
 

00:05:46.380 --> 00:05:48.350 align:start position:0%
they are just cryptographic magic right
so<00:05:46.560><c> in</c><00:05:46.919><c> that</c><00:05:47.039><c> case</c><00:05:47.160><c> you</c><00:05:47.280><c> don't</c><00:05:47.460><c> have</c><00:05:47.580><c> to</c><00:05:47.759><c> to</c><00:05:47.940><c> do</c>

00:05:48.350 --> 00:05:48.360 align:start position:0%
so in that case you don't have to to do
 

00:05:48.360 --> 00:05:50.510 align:start position:0%
so in that case you don't have to to do
this<00:05:48.479><c> retractive</c><00:05:49.259><c> fixing</c><00:05:49.979><c> of</c><00:05:50.160><c> problems</c>

00:05:50.510 --> 00:05:50.520 align:start position:0%
this retractive fixing of problems
 

00:05:50.520 --> 00:05:53.629 align:start position:0%
this retractive fixing of problems
instead<00:05:51.120><c> you</c><00:05:51.300><c> just</c><00:05:51.720><c> have</c><00:05:52.320><c> any</c><00:05:52.860><c> state</c><00:05:53.280><c> update</c>

00:05:53.629 --> 00:05:53.639 align:start position:0%
instead you just have any state update
 

00:05:53.639 --> 00:05:55.969 align:start position:0%
instead you just have any state update
come<00:05:53.820><c> with</c><00:05:54.000><c> a</c><00:05:54.180><c> cryptographic</c><00:05:54.840><c> proof</c><00:05:55.199><c> that</c><00:05:55.860><c> no</c>

00:05:55.969 --> 00:05:55.979 align:start position:0%
come with a cryptographic proof that no
 

00:05:55.979 --> 00:05:57.710 align:start position:0%
come with a cryptographic proof that no
one<00:05:56.160><c> did</c><00:05:56.340><c> anything</c><00:05:56.460><c> wrong</c><00:05:56.820><c> and</c><00:05:57.360><c> again</c><00:05:57.479><c> you</c>

00:05:57.710 --> 00:05:57.720 align:start position:0%
one did anything wrong and again you
 

00:05:57.720 --> 00:05:59.990 align:start position:0%
one did anything wrong and again you
need<00:05:57.900><c> some</c><00:05:58.020><c> sort</c><00:05:58.199><c> of</c><00:05:58.259><c> settlement</c><00:05:58.560><c> platform</c>

00:05:59.990 --> 00:06:00.000 align:start position:0%
need some sort of settlement platform
 

00:06:00.000 --> 00:06:01.610 align:start position:0%
need some sort of settlement platform
um<00:06:00.060><c> where</c><00:06:00.479><c> you</c><00:06:00.600><c> can</c><00:06:00.720><c> where</c><00:06:00.900><c> you</c><00:06:01.080><c> can</c><00:06:01.199><c> resolve</c>

00:06:01.610 --> 00:06:01.620 align:start position:0%
um where you can where you can resolve
 

00:06:01.620 --> 00:06:02.450 align:start position:0%
um where you can where you can resolve
this

00:06:02.450 --> 00:06:02.460 align:start position:0%
this
 

00:06:02.460 --> 00:06:06.890 align:start position:0%
this
um<00:06:02.580><c> one</c><00:06:03.060><c> more</c><00:06:03.240><c> a</c><00:06:03.539><c> little</c><00:06:03.720><c> caveat</c><00:06:04.139><c> here</c><00:06:04.440><c> is</c><00:06:05.039><c> that</c>

00:06:06.890 --> 00:06:06.900 align:start position:0%
um one more a little caveat here is that
 

00:06:06.900 --> 00:06:08.330 align:start position:0%
um one more a little caveat here is that
um<00:06:06.960><c> basically</c><00:06:07.320><c> with</c><00:06:07.560><c> Roll-Ups</c><00:06:08.039><c> we're</c><00:06:08.160><c> moving</c>

00:06:08.330 --> 00:06:08.340 align:start position:0%
um basically with Roll-Ups we're moving
 

00:06:08.340 --> 00:06:10.310 align:start position:0%
um basically with Roll-Ups we're moving
away<00:06:08.520><c> from</c><00:06:08.759><c> this</c><00:06:08.940><c> world</c><00:06:09.060><c> where</c><00:06:09.360><c> like</c><00:06:09.660><c> everyone</c>

00:06:10.310 --> 00:06:10.320 align:start position:0%
away from this world where like everyone
 

00:06:10.320 --> 00:06:12.409 align:start position:0%
away from this world where like everyone
needs<00:06:10.919><c> to</c><00:06:10.979><c> run</c><00:06:11.160><c> their</c><00:06:11.400><c> own</c><00:06:11.520><c> like</c><00:06:11.759><c> full</c><00:06:12.000><c> node</c><00:06:12.300><c> to</c>

00:06:12.409 --> 00:06:12.419 align:start position:0%
needs to run their own like full node to
 

00:06:12.419 --> 00:06:14.150 align:start position:0%
needs to run their own like full node to
ensure<00:06:12.720><c> Integrity</c><00:06:13.080><c> right</c><00:06:13.320><c> like</c><00:06:13.620><c> I</c><00:06:13.860><c> could</c>

00:06:14.150 --> 00:06:14.160 align:start position:0%
ensure Integrity right like I could
 

00:06:14.160 --> 00:06:15.950 align:start position:0%
ensure Integrity right like I could
basically<00:06:14.460><c> only</c><00:06:14.759><c> follow</c><00:06:15.300><c> the</c><00:06:15.539><c> settlement</c>

00:06:15.950 --> 00:06:15.960 align:start position:0%
basically only follow the settlement
 

00:06:15.960 --> 00:06:17.029 align:start position:0%
basically only follow the settlement
chain

00:06:17.029 --> 00:06:17.039 align:start position:0%
chain
 

00:06:17.039 --> 00:06:18.409 align:start position:0%
chain
um<00:06:17.100><c> and</c><00:06:17.340><c> still</c><00:06:17.520><c> basically</c><00:06:17.880><c> have</c><00:06:18.060><c> all</c><00:06:18.240><c> the</c>

00:06:18.409 --> 00:06:18.419 align:start position:0%
um and still basically have all the
 

00:06:18.419 --> 00:06:20.330 align:start position:0%
um and still basically have all the
guarantees<00:06:18.780><c> about</c><00:06:18.960><c> the</c><00:06:19.139><c> roll</c><00:06:19.259><c> up</c>

00:06:20.330 --> 00:06:20.340 align:start position:0%
guarantees about the roll up
 

00:06:20.340 --> 00:06:23.450 align:start position:0%
guarantees about the roll up
um<00:06:20.400><c> but</c><00:06:21.180><c> one</c><00:06:21.900><c> additional</c><00:06:22.319><c> uh</c><00:06:22.800><c> thing</c><00:06:23.039><c> thing</c><00:06:23.280><c> to</c>

00:06:23.450 --> 00:06:23.460 align:start position:0%
um but one additional uh thing thing to
 

00:06:23.460 --> 00:06:25.189 align:start position:0%
um but one additional uh thing thing to
to<00:06:23.639><c> ensure</c><00:06:23.940><c> is</c><00:06:24.060><c> that</c><00:06:24.240><c> we</c><00:06:24.360><c> have</c><00:06:24.539><c> to</c><00:06:24.720><c> also</c><00:06:25.080><c> pay</c>

00:06:25.189 --> 00:06:25.199 align:start position:0%
to ensure is that we have to also pay
 

00:06:25.199 --> 00:06:27.050 align:start position:0%
to ensure is that we have to also pay
attention<00:06:25.500><c> to</c><00:06:25.740><c> data</c><00:06:26.100><c> if</c><00:06:26.580><c> you</c><00:06:26.639><c> run</c><00:06:26.819><c> your</c><00:06:26.940><c> own</c>

00:06:27.050 --> 00:06:27.060 align:start position:0%
attention to data if you run your own
 

00:06:27.060 --> 00:06:28.969 align:start position:0%
attention to data if you run your own
full<00:06:27.240><c> node</c><00:06:27.479><c> for</c><00:06:27.660><c> a</c><00:06:27.840><c> chain</c><00:06:27.960><c> data</c><00:06:28.560><c> is</c><00:06:28.620><c> implied</c>

00:06:28.969 --> 00:06:28.979 align:start position:0%
full node for a chain data is implied
 

00:06:28.979 --> 00:06:30.230 align:start position:0%
full node for a chain data is implied
right<00:06:29.220><c> because</c><00:06:29.400><c> you</c><00:06:29.580><c> actually</c><00:06:29.699><c> download</c><00:06:29.940><c> all</c>

00:06:30.230 --> 00:06:30.240 align:start position:0%
right because you actually download all
 

00:06:30.240 --> 00:06:31.610 align:start position:0%
right because you actually download all
the<00:06:30.360><c> data</c><00:06:30.539><c> and</c><00:06:30.600><c> execute</c><00:06:30.960><c> it</c><00:06:31.139><c> locally</c><00:06:31.319><c> but</c><00:06:31.440><c> with</c>

00:06:31.610 --> 00:06:31.620 align:start position:0%
the data and execute it locally but with
 

00:06:31.620 --> 00:06:33.469 align:start position:0%
the data and execute it locally but with
follow-ups<00:06:32.039><c> you</c><00:06:32.100><c> don't</c><00:06:32.220><c> do</c><00:06:32.340><c> that</c><00:06:32.460><c> anymore</c><00:06:32.639><c> so</c>

00:06:33.469 --> 00:06:33.479 align:start position:0%
follow-ups you don't do that anymore so
 

00:06:33.479 --> 00:06:35.930 align:start position:0%
follow-ups you don't do that anymore so
now<00:06:33.660><c> we</c><00:06:33.900><c> basically</c><00:06:34.139><c> need</c><00:06:34.520><c> explicit</c><00:06:35.520><c> data</c>

00:06:35.930 --> 00:06:35.940 align:start position:0%
now we basically need explicit data
 

00:06:35.940 --> 00:06:37.850 align:start position:0%
now we basically need explicit data
availability<00:06:36.300><c> mechanisms</c>

00:06:37.850 --> 00:06:37.860 align:start position:0%
availability mechanisms
 

00:06:37.860 --> 00:06:40.370 align:start position:0%
availability mechanisms
um<00:06:37.979><c> and</c><00:06:38.699><c> and</c><00:06:38.940><c> that's</c><00:06:39.300><c> what</c><00:06:39.479><c> I</c><00:06:39.720><c> put</c><00:06:40.020><c> this</c><00:06:40.199><c> little</c>

00:06:40.370 --> 00:06:40.380 align:start position:0%
um and and that's what I put this little
 

00:06:40.380 --> 00:06:42.350 align:start position:0%
um and and that's what I put this little
kind<00:06:40.620><c> of</c><00:06:40.740><c> database</c><00:06:41.160><c> symbol</c><00:06:41.520><c> there</c>

00:06:42.350 --> 00:06:42.360 align:start position:0%
kind of database symbol there
 

00:06:42.360 --> 00:06:45.590 align:start position:0%
kind of database symbol there
um<00:06:42.840><c> yeah</c><00:06:43.440><c> and</c><00:06:43.620><c> and</c><00:06:43.740><c> with</c><00:06:44.220><c> that</c><00:06:44.400><c> basically</c><00:06:44.759><c> once</c>

00:06:45.590 --> 00:06:45.600 align:start position:0%
um yeah and and with that basically once
 

00:06:45.600 --> 00:06:47.390 align:start position:0%
um yeah and and with that basically once
you<00:06:45.720><c> have</c><00:06:45.900><c> you</c><00:06:46.199><c> have</c><00:06:46.319><c> like</c><00:06:46.500><c> an</c><00:06:46.919><c> explicit</c>

00:06:47.390 --> 00:06:47.400 align:start position:0%
you have you have like an explicit
 

00:06:47.400 --> 00:06:48.650 align:start position:0%
you have you have like an explicit
settlement<00:06:47.819><c> system</c><00:06:48.060><c> and</c><00:06:48.360><c> you</c><00:06:48.419><c> have</c><00:06:48.600><c> an</c>

00:06:48.650 --> 00:06:48.660 align:start position:0%
settlement system and you have an
 

00:06:48.660 --> 00:06:50.570 align:start position:0%
settlement system and you have an
explicit<00:06:49.080><c> data</c><00:06:49.319><c> availability</c><00:06:49.680><c> system</c>

00:06:50.570 --> 00:06:50.580 align:start position:0%
explicit data availability system
 

00:06:50.580 --> 00:06:52.969 align:start position:0%
explicit data availability system
now<00:06:51.240><c> basically</c><00:06:51.600><c> you</c><00:06:51.780><c> you</c><00:06:51.900><c> can</c><00:06:52.380><c> break</c><00:06:52.500><c> out</c><00:06:52.800><c> of</c>

00:06:52.969 --> 00:06:52.979 align:start position:0%
now basically you you can break out of
 

00:06:52.979 --> 00:06:56.029 align:start position:0%
now basically you you can break out of
this<00:06:53.220><c> of</c><00:06:53.639><c> this</c><00:06:54.000><c> kind</c><00:06:54.180><c> of</c><00:06:54.300><c> graph</c><00:06:54.840><c> of</c><00:06:55.080><c> of</c>

00:06:56.029 --> 00:06:56.039 align:start position:0%
this of this kind of graph of of
 

00:06:56.039 --> 00:06:57.710 align:start position:0%
this of this kind of graph of of
um<00:06:56.160><c> of</c><00:06:56.639><c> this</c>

00:06:57.710 --> 00:06:57.720 align:start position:0%
um of this
 

00:06:57.720 --> 00:07:00.890 align:start position:0%
um of this
um<00:06:57.840><c> full</c><00:06:58.560><c> node</c><00:06:58.919><c> uh</c><00:06:59.400><c> versus</c><00:06:59.639><c> throughput</c>

00:07:00.890 --> 00:07:00.900 align:start position:0%
um full node uh versus throughput
 

00:07:00.900 --> 00:07:04.309 align:start position:0%
um full node uh versus throughput
um<00:07:01.319><c> uh</c><00:07:02.100><c> basically</c><00:07:02.400><c> trade-off</c><00:07:02.880><c> and</c><00:07:03.600><c> uh</c><00:07:03.960><c> and</c><00:07:04.199><c> how</c>

00:07:04.309 --> 00:07:04.319 align:start position:0%
um uh basically trade-off and uh and how
 

00:07:04.319 --> 00:07:05.930 align:start position:0%
um uh basically trade-off and uh and how
can<00:07:04.440><c> you</c><00:07:04.560><c> actually</c><00:07:04.680><c> use</c><00:07:04.979><c> this</c><00:07:05.220><c> now</c><00:07:05.400><c> to</c><00:07:05.639><c> kind</c><00:07:05.819><c> of</c>

00:07:05.930 --> 00:07:05.940 align:start position:0%
can you actually use this now to kind of
 

00:07:05.940 --> 00:07:08.510 align:start position:0%
can you actually use this now to kind of
to<00:07:06.120><c> build</c><00:07:06.660><c> full</c><00:07:07.080><c> blockchain</c><00:07:07.620><c> systems</c><00:07:08.460><c> um</c>

00:07:08.510 --> 00:07:08.520 align:start position:0%
to build full blockchain systems um
 

00:07:08.520 --> 00:07:09.590 align:start position:0%
to build full blockchain systems um
that's<00:07:08.639><c> kind</c><00:07:08.819><c> of</c><00:07:08.940><c> what</c><00:07:09.000><c> the</c><00:07:09.180><c> what</c><00:07:09.360><c> the</c><00:07:09.479><c> second</c>

00:07:09.590 --> 00:07:09.600 align:start position:0%
that's kind of what the what the second
 

00:07:09.600 --> 00:07:11.029 align:start position:0%
that's kind of what the what the second
part<00:07:09.780><c> is</c><00:07:09.900><c> about</c><00:07:10.080><c> like</c><00:07:10.319><c> how</c><00:07:10.560><c> how</c><00:07:10.740><c> do</c><00:07:10.919><c> you</c>

00:07:11.029 --> 00:07:11.039 align:start position:0%
part is about like how how do you
 

00:07:11.039 --> 00:07:13.010 align:start position:0%
part is about like how how do you
actually<00:07:11.340><c> turn</c><00:07:11.639><c> this</c><00:07:11.819><c> into</c><00:07:12.060><c> into</c><00:07:12.720><c> something</c>

00:07:13.010 --> 00:07:13.020 align:start position:0%
actually turn this into into something
 

00:07:13.020 --> 00:07:14.629 align:start position:0%
actually turn this into into something
useful

00:07:14.629 --> 00:07:14.639 align:start position:0%
useful
 

00:07:14.639 --> 00:07:16.550 align:start position:0%
useful
um<00:07:14.759><c> and</c><00:07:15.180><c> this</c><00:07:15.600><c> is</c><00:07:15.720><c> going</c><00:07:15.900><c> to</c><00:07:16.020><c> be</c><00:07:16.080><c> very</c><00:07:16.259><c> picture</c>

00:07:16.550 --> 00:07:16.560 align:start position:0%
um and this is going to be very picture
 

00:07:16.560 --> 00:07:18.890 align:start position:0%
um and this is going to be very picture
heavy<00:07:17.100><c> because</c><00:07:17.280><c> I</c><00:07:17.520><c> kind</c><00:07:17.639><c> of</c><00:07:17.699><c> I</c><00:07:17.940><c> don't</c><00:07:18.060><c> know</c><00:07:18.180><c> for</c>

00:07:18.890 --> 00:07:18.900 align:start position:0%
heavy because I kind of I don't know for
 

00:07:18.900 --> 00:07:20.930 align:start position:0%
heavy because I kind of I don't know for
me<00:07:19.020><c> it's</c><00:07:19.139><c> mostly</c><00:07:19.440><c> about</c><00:07:19.680><c> giving</c><00:07:20.580><c> good</c>

00:07:20.930 --> 00:07:20.940 align:start position:0%
me it's mostly about giving good
 

00:07:20.940 --> 00:07:22.309 align:start position:0%
me it's mostly about giving good
intuitions<00:07:21.599><c> here</c>

00:07:22.309 --> 00:07:22.319 align:start position:0%
intuitions here
 

00:07:22.319 --> 00:07:23.990 align:start position:0%
intuitions here
um<00:07:22.380><c> for</c><00:07:22.560><c> like</c><00:07:22.740><c> I</c><00:07:23.039><c> don't</c><00:07:23.160><c> know</c><00:07:23.220><c> my</c><00:07:23.639><c> mental</c>

00:07:23.990 --> 00:07:24.000 align:start position:0%
um for like I don't know my mental
 

00:07:24.000 --> 00:07:25.249 align:start position:0%
um for like I don't know my mental
models<00:07:24.300><c> around</c><00:07:24.360><c> this</c><00:07:24.599><c> basically</c><00:07:24.900><c> that</c><00:07:25.080><c> was</c>

00:07:25.249 --> 00:07:25.259 align:start position:0%
models around this basically that was
 

00:07:25.259 --> 00:07:27.529 align:start position:0%
models around this basically that was
that<00:07:25.380><c> was</c><00:07:25.560><c> my</c><00:07:25.680><c> motivation</c><00:07:26.220><c> for</c><00:07:26.400><c> the</c><00:07:26.520><c> talk</c>

00:07:27.529 --> 00:07:27.539 align:start position:0%
that was my motivation for the talk
 

00:07:27.539 --> 00:07:29.210 align:start position:0%
that was my motivation for the talk
um<00:07:27.660><c> so</c><00:07:27.900><c> again</c><00:07:28.020><c> this</c><00:07:28.380><c> is</c><00:07:28.500><c> like</c><00:07:28.680><c> an</c><00:07:28.860><c> execution</c>

00:07:29.210 --> 00:07:29.220 align:start position:0%
um so again this is like an execution
 

00:07:29.220 --> 00:07:31.189 align:start position:0%
um so again this is like an execution
chain<00:07:29.460><c> I</c><00:07:29.880><c> drew</c><00:07:30.180><c> a</c><00:07:30.240><c> little</c><00:07:30.300><c> box</c><00:07:30.539><c> around</c><00:07:30.780><c> it</c><00:07:30.960><c> it's</c>

00:07:31.189 --> 00:07:31.199 align:start position:0%
chain I drew a little box around it it's
 

00:07:31.199 --> 00:07:32.990 align:start position:0%
chain I drew a little box around it it's
basically<00:07:31.560><c> in</c><00:07:31.800><c> its</c><00:07:31.979><c> own</c><00:07:32.039><c> box</c><00:07:32.220><c> there</c><00:07:32.460><c> it</c><00:07:32.819><c> has</c>

00:07:32.990 --> 00:07:33.000 align:start position:0%
basically in its own box there it has
 

00:07:33.000 --> 00:07:34.430 align:start position:0%
basically in its own box there it has
its<00:07:33.240><c> own</c><00:07:33.300><c> security</c>

00:07:34.430 --> 00:07:34.440 align:start position:0%
its own security
 

00:07:34.440 --> 00:07:36.350 align:start position:0%
its own security
um<00:07:34.500><c> and</c><00:07:35.160><c> that's</c><00:07:35.280><c> that's</c><00:07:35.520><c> the</c><00:07:35.819><c> world</c><00:07:35.940><c> as</c><00:07:36.180><c> it</c>

00:07:36.350 --> 00:07:36.360 align:start position:0%
um and that's that's the world as it
 

00:07:36.360 --> 00:07:37.850 align:start position:0%
um and that's that's the world as it
used<00:07:36.479><c> to</c><00:07:36.599><c> be</c><00:07:36.660><c> the</c><00:07:36.840><c> blockchain</c><00:07:37.199><c> world</c><00:07:37.380><c> we</c><00:07:37.620><c> had</c><00:07:37.740><c> a</c>

00:07:37.850 --> 00:07:37.860 align:start position:0%
used to be the blockchain world we had a
 

00:07:37.860 --> 00:07:39.589 align:start position:0%
used to be the blockchain world we had a
lot<00:07:38.039><c> of</c><00:07:38.160><c> these</c><00:07:38.340><c> boxes</c><00:07:38.699><c> like</c><00:07:39.060><c> a</c><00:07:39.240><c> couple</c><00:07:39.419><c> years</c>

00:07:39.589 --> 00:07:39.599 align:start position:0%
lot of these boxes like a couple years
 

00:07:39.599 --> 00:07:41.809 align:start position:0%
lot of these boxes like a couple years
ago<00:07:39.900><c> right</c><00:07:40.139><c> and</c><00:07:40.800><c> now</c><00:07:41.160><c> we're</c><00:07:41.280><c> adding</c><00:07:41.639><c> these</c>

00:07:41.809 --> 00:07:41.819 align:start position:0%
ago right and now we're adding these
 

00:07:41.819 --> 00:07:44.510 align:start position:0%
ago right and now we're adding these
exciting<00:07:42.360><c> new</c><00:07:42.539><c> tools</c><00:07:43.380><c> um</c><00:07:43.440><c> to</c><00:07:43.680><c> the</c><00:07:44.039><c> picture</c><00:07:44.160><c> we</c>

00:07:44.510 --> 00:07:44.520 align:start position:0%
exciting new tools um to the picture we
 

00:07:44.520 --> 00:07:45.890 align:start position:0%
exciting new tools um to the picture we
are<00:07:44.639><c> we're</c><00:07:44.940><c> adding</c><00:07:45.240><c> settlement</c><00:07:45.539><c> and</c><00:07:45.780><c> we're</c>

00:07:45.890 --> 00:07:45.900 align:start position:0%
are we're adding settlement and we're
 

00:07:45.900 --> 00:07:47.510 align:start position:0%
are we're adding settlement and we're
adding<00:07:46.199><c> data</c><00:07:46.500><c> availability</c>

00:07:47.510 --> 00:07:47.520 align:start position:0%
adding data availability
 

00:07:47.520 --> 00:07:49.189 align:start position:0%
adding data availability
um<00:07:47.580><c> and</c><00:07:47.759><c> how</c><00:07:47.880><c> do</c><00:07:48.000><c> they</c><00:07:48.419><c> basically</c><00:07:48.720><c> change</c><00:07:48.960><c> the</c>

00:07:49.189 --> 00:07:49.199 align:start position:0%
um and how do they basically change the
 

00:07:49.199 --> 00:07:50.809 align:start position:0%
um and how do they basically change the
picture<00:07:49.319><c> well</c><00:07:49.740><c> first</c><00:07:50.099><c> we</c><00:07:50.340><c> kind</c><00:07:50.520><c> of</c><00:07:50.580><c> have</c><00:07:50.639><c> to</c>

00:07:50.809 --> 00:07:50.819 align:start position:0%
picture well first we kind of have to
 

00:07:50.819 --> 00:07:52.490 align:start position:0%
picture well first we kind of have to
bundle<00:07:51.240><c> them</c><00:07:51.419><c> in</c><00:07:51.599><c> some</c><00:07:51.720><c> like</c><00:07:51.960><c> we</c><00:07:52.139><c> have</c><00:07:52.259><c> to</c><00:07:52.380><c> kind</c>

00:07:52.490 --> 00:07:52.500 align:start position:0%
bundle them in some like we have to kind
 

00:07:52.500 --> 00:07:54.350 align:start position:0%
bundle them in some like we have to kind
of<00:07:52.620><c> put</c><00:07:52.740><c> them</c><00:07:52.919><c> into</c><00:07:53.099><c> some</c><00:07:53.340><c> useful</c><00:07:53.639><c> form</c><00:07:53.819><c> uh</c><00:07:54.120><c> the</c>

00:07:54.350 --> 00:07:54.360 align:start position:0%
of put them into some useful form uh the
 

00:07:54.360 --> 00:07:55.430 align:start position:0%
of put them into some useful form uh the
way<00:07:54.419><c> we</c><00:07:54.599><c> like</c><00:07:54.780><c> to</c><00:07:54.900><c> think</c><00:07:55.020><c> about</c><00:07:55.139><c> it</c><00:07:55.319><c> is</c>

00:07:55.430 --> 00:07:55.440 align:start position:0%
way we like to think about it is
 

00:07:55.440 --> 00:07:56.570 align:start position:0%
way we like to think about it is
bundling<00:07:55.740><c> them</c><00:07:55.919><c> into</c><00:07:56.039><c> what</c><00:07:56.280><c> we</c><00:07:56.340><c> call</c><00:07:56.460><c> a</c>

00:07:56.570 --> 00:07:56.580 align:start position:0%
bundling them into what we call a
 

00:07:56.580 --> 00:07:58.189 align:start position:0%
bundling them into what we call a
settlement<00:07:56.880><c> chain</c><00:07:57.180><c> which</c><00:07:57.660><c> is</c><00:07:57.780><c> its</c><00:07:58.139><c> own</c>

00:07:58.189 --> 00:07:58.199 align:start position:0%
settlement chain which is its own
 

00:07:58.199 --> 00:07:59.870 align:start position:0%
settlement chain which is its own
blockchain<00:07:58.740><c> there</c><00:07:58.979><c> you</c><00:07:59.160><c> can</c><00:07:59.220><c> see</c><00:07:59.340><c> it</c><00:07:59.460><c> has</c><00:07:59.639><c> its</c>

00:07:59.870 --> 00:07:59.880 align:start position:0%
blockchain there you can see it has its
 

00:07:59.880 --> 00:08:02.029 align:start position:0%
blockchain there you can see it has its
own<00:07:59.940><c> security</c><00:08:00.120><c> and</c><00:08:00.900><c> it's</c><00:08:01.080><c> not</c><00:08:01.259><c> the</c><00:08:01.740><c> only</c><00:08:01.860><c> way</c>

00:08:02.029 --> 00:08:02.039 align:start position:0%
own security and it's not the only way
 

00:08:02.039 --> 00:08:04.070 align:start position:0%
own security and it's not the only way
to<00:08:02.160><c> do</c><00:08:02.340><c> to</c><00:08:02.819><c> do</c><00:08:02.940><c> this</c><00:08:03.060><c> like</c><00:08:03.300><c> if</c><00:08:03.479><c> you</c><00:08:03.599><c> for</c><00:08:03.840><c> example</c>

00:08:04.070 --> 00:08:04.080 align:start position:0%
to do to do this like if you for example
 

00:08:04.080 --> 00:08:06.409 align:start position:0%
to do to do this like if you for example
know<00:08:04.259><c> Celestia</c><00:08:04.800><c> which</c><00:08:05.099><c> is</c><00:08:05.639><c> a</c><00:08:06.000><c> really</c><00:08:06.120><c> really</c>

00:08:06.409 --> 00:08:06.419 align:start position:0%
know Celestia which is a really really
 

00:08:06.419 --> 00:08:08.510 align:start position:0%
know Celestia which is a really really
interesting<00:08:07.259><c> other</c><00:08:07.919><c> um</c><00:08:07.919><c> kind</c><00:08:08.160><c> of</c><00:08:08.280><c> project</c>

00:08:08.510 --> 00:08:08.520 align:start position:0%
interesting other um kind of project
 

00:08:08.520 --> 00:08:11.749 align:start position:0%
interesting other um kind of project
that<00:08:09.060><c> that</c><00:08:09.419><c> basically</c><00:08:10.199><c> works</c><00:08:11.099><c> with</c><00:08:11.220><c> similar</c>

00:08:11.749 --> 00:08:11.759 align:start position:0%
that that basically works with similar
 

00:08:11.759 --> 00:08:15.469 align:start position:0%
that that basically works with similar
kind<00:08:12.000><c> of</c><00:08:12.120><c> models</c><00:08:12.840><c> and</c><00:08:13.680><c> they</c><00:08:14.520><c> keep</c><00:08:14.819><c> data</c><00:08:15.360><c> and</c>

00:08:15.469 --> 00:08:15.479 align:start position:0%
kind of models and they keep data and
 

00:08:15.479 --> 00:08:16.790 align:start position:0%
kind of models and they keep data and
settlement<00:08:15.780><c> separate</c>

00:08:16.790 --> 00:08:16.800 align:start position:0%
settlement separate
 

00:08:16.800 --> 00:08:19.010 align:start position:0%
settlement separate
um<00:08:16.860><c> but</c><00:08:17.160><c> for</c><00:08:17.340><c> us</c><00:08:17.520><c> the</c><00:08:18.060><c> the</c><00:08:18.120><c> way</c><00:08:18.479><c> ethereum</c><00:08:18.840><c> kind</c>

00:08:19.010 --> 00:08:19.020 align:start position:0%
um but for us the the way ethereum kind
 

00:08:19.020 --> 00:08:20.150 align:start position:0%
um but for us the the way ethereum kind
of<00:08:19.080><c> likes</c><00:08:19.319><c> to</c><00:08:19.379><c> approach</c><00:08:19.560><c> these</c><00:08:19.740><c> things</c><00:08:19.800><c> is</c><00:08:19.979><c> by</c>

00:08:20.150 --> 00:08:20.160 align:start position:0%
of likes to approach these things is by
 

00:08:20.160 --> 00:08:22.129 align:start position:0%
of likes to approach these things is by
combining<00:08:20.879><c> them</c><00:08:21.000><c> into</c><00:08:21.180><c> into</c><00:08:21.660><c> a</c><00:08:21.900><c> settlement</c>

00:08:22.129 --> 00:08:22.139 align:start position:0%
combining them into into a settlement
 

00:08:22.139 --> 00:08:23.869 align:start position:0%
combining them into into a settlement
chain<00:08:22.379><c> so</c><00:08:22.620><c> now</c><00:08:22.740><c> so</c><00:08:22.979><c> now</c><00:08:23.160><c> we</c><00:08:23.280><c> have</c><00:08:23.400><c> these</c><00:08:23.639><c> these</c>

00:08:23.869 --> 00:08:23.879 align:start position:0%
chain so now so now we have these these
 

00:08:23.879 --> 00:08:25.309 align:start position:0%
chain so now so now we have these these
two<00:08:24.000><c> separate</c><00:08:24.240><c> chains</c><00:08:24.599><c> how</c><00:08:24.720><c> do</c><00:08:24.840><c> we</c><00:08:24.960><c> basically</c>

00:08:25.309 --> 00:08:25.319 align:start position:0%
two separate chains how do we basically
 

00:08:25.319 --> 00:08:28.010 align:start position:0%
two separate chains how do we basically
now<00:08:25.919><c> actually</c><00:08:26.580><c> make</c><00:08:26.879><c> use</c><00:08:27.060><c> of</c><00:08:27.240><c> them</c><00:08:27.419><c> well</c><00:08:27.720><c> the</c>

00:08:28.010 --> 00:08:28.020 align:start position:0%
now actually make use of them well the
 

00:08:28.020 --> 00:08:30.589 align:start position:0%
now actually make use of them well the
way<00:08:28.379><c> to</c><00:08:28.500><c> do</c><00:08:28.620><c> this</c><00:08:28.800><c> is</c><00:08:29.099><c> by</c><00:08:29.759><c> and</c><00:08:30.060><c> that's</c><00:08:30.240><c> what</c><00:08:30.419><c> the</c>

00:08:30.589 --> 00:08:30.599 align:start position:0%
way to do this is by and that's what the
 

00:08:30.599 --> 00:08:32.329 align:start position:0%
way to do this is by and that's what the
arrows<00:08:30.900><c> are</c><00:08:31.020><c> for</c><00:08:31.139><c> by</c><00:08:31.379><c> basically</c><00:08:31.740><c> having</c>

00:08:32.329 --> 00:08:32.339 align:start position:0%
arrows are for by basically having
 

00:08:32.339 --> 00:08:34.370 align:start position:0%
arrows are for by basically having
turning<00:08:32.940><c> the</c><00:08:33.060><c> execution</c><00:08:33.419><c> chain</c><00:08:33.659><c> into</c><00:08:33.959><c> a</c><00:08:34.200><c> roll</c>

00:08:34.370 --> 00:08:34.380 align:start position:0%
turning the execution chain into a roll
 

00:08:34.380 --> 00:08:35.269 align:start position:0%
turning the execution chain into a roll
up

00:08:35.269 --> 00:08:35.279 align:start position:0%
up
 

00:08:35.279 --> 00:08:37.430 align:start position:0%
up
um<00:08:35.339><c> it</c><00:08:35.700><c> kind</c><00:08:35.880><c> of</c><00:08:36.000><c> functions</c><00:08:36.599><c> as</c><00:08:36.779><c> it</c><00:08:37.140><c> did</c><00:08:37.260><c> before</c>

00:08:37.430 --> 00:08:37.440 align:start position:0%
um it kind of functions as it did before
 

00:08:37.440 --> 00:08:39.230 align:start position:0%
um it kind of functions as it did before
but<00:08:37.800><c> now</c><00:08:37.979><c> it</c><00:08:38.219><c> uses</c><00:08:38.459><c> this</c><00:08:38.640><c> the</c><00:08:38.880><c> settlement</c>

00:08:39.230 --> 00:08:39.240 align:start position:0%
but now it uses this the settlement
 

00:08:39.240 --> 00:08:41.870 align:start position:0%
but now it uses this the settlement
chain<00:08:39.479><c> for</c><00:08:40.260><c> for</c><00:08:40.500><c> for</c><00:08:40.560><c> data</c><00:08:41.159><c> availability</c><00:08:41.459><c> and</c>

00:08:41.870 --> 00:08:41.880 align:start position:0%
chain for for for data availability and
 

00:08:41.880 --> 00:08:44.089 align:start position:0%
chain for for for data availability and
for<00:08:42.599><c> um</c><00:08:42.659><c> settlements</c><00:08:43.200><c> so</c><00:08:43.380><c> you</c><00:08:43.500><c> need</c><00:08:43.800><c> some</c><00:08:43.979><c> sort</c>

00:08:44.089 --> 00:08:44.099 align:start position:0%
for um settlements so you need some sort
 

00:08:44.099 --> 00:08:45.590 align:start position:0%
for um settlements so you need some sort
of<00:08:44.159><c> fraud-proving</c><00:08:44.760><c> mechanism</c><00:08:45.000><c> or</c><00:08:45.240><c> it</c><00:08:45.420><c> needs</c>

00:08:45.590 --> 00:08:45.600 align:start position:0%
of fraud-proving mechanism or it needs
 

00:08:45.600 --> 00:08:47.630 align:start position:0%
of fraud-proving mechanism or it needs
some<00:08:45.660><c> validity</c><00:08:46.080><c> proofs</c><00:08:46.380><c> attached</c><00:08:46.800><c> but</c><00:08:47.519><c> other</c>

00:08:47.630 --> 00:08:47.640 align:start position:0%
some validity proofs attached but other
 

00:08:47.640 --> 00:08:49.370 align:start position:0%
some validity proofs attached but other
than<00:08:47.880><c> that</c><00:08:48.060><c> it</c><00:08:48.360><c> still</c><00:08:48.600><c> feels</c><00:08:48.899><c> like</c><00:08:49.019><c> a</c><00:08:49.260><c> normal</c>

00:08:49.370 --> 00:08:49.380 align:start position:0%
than that it still feels like a normal
 

00:08:49.380 --> 00:08:51.230 align:start position:0%
than that it still feels like a normal
blockchain<00:08:50.040><c> basically</c>

00:08:51.230 --> 00:08:51.240 align:start position:0%
blockchain basically
 

00:08:51.240 --> 00:08:52.610 align:start position:0%
blockchain basically
um<00:08:51.300><c> the</c><00:08:51.480><c> simplest</c><00:08:51.779><c> way</c><00:08:51.899><c> to</c><00:08:52.080><c> do</c><00:08:52.140><c> this</c><00:08:52.260><c> is</c><00:08:52.500><c> what</c>

00:08:52.610 --> 00:08:52.620 align:start position:0%
um the simplest way to do this is what
 

00:08:52.620 --> 00:08:54.650 align:start position:0%
um the simplest way to do this is what
what<00:08:52.800><c> we</c><00:08:52.980><c> call</c><00:08:53.160><c> like</c><00:08:53.459><c> an</c><00:08:53.700><c> in</c><00:08:53.940><c> try</c><00:08:54.180><c> and</c><00:08:54.300><c> roll</c><00:08:54.480><c> up</c>

00:08:54.650 --> 00:08:54.660 align:start position:0%
what we call like an in try and roll up
 

00:08:54.660 --> 00:08:56.090 align:start position:0%
what we call like an in try and roll up
so<00:08:54.839><c> in</c><00:08:54.959><c> that</c><00:08:55.080><c> case</c><00:08:55.200><c> you'd</c><00:08:55.560><c> have</c><00:08:55.680><c> like</c><00:08:55.860><c> one</c>

00:08:56.090 --> 00:08:56.100 align:start position:0%
so in that case you'd have like one
 

00:08:56.100 --> 00:08:58.190 align:start position:0%
so in that case you'd have like one
settlement<00:08:56.459><c> chain</c><00:08:56.760><c> and</c><00:08:57.360><c> one</c><00:08:57.540><c> roll</c><00:08:57.720><c> up</c><00:08:57.899><c> on</c><00:08:58.080><c> top</c>

00:08:58.190 --> 00:08:58.200 align:start position:0%
settlement chain and one roll up on top
 

00:08:58.200 --> 00:08:59.990 align:start position:0%
settlement chain and one roll up on top
and<00:08:58.380><c> it's</c><00:08:58.560><c> basically</c><00:08:58.800><c> like</c><00:08:58.920><c> a</c><00:08:59.279><c> one</c><00:08:59.399><c> one</c><00:08:59.640><c> to</c><00:08:59.820><c> one</c>

00:08:59.990 --> 00:09:00.000 align:start position:0%
and it's basically like a one one to one
 

00:09:00.000 --> 00:09:02.870 align:start position:0%
and it's basically like a one one to one
and<00:09:00.839><c> really</c><00:09:01.200><c> relationship</c><00:09:01.860><c> and</c><00:09:02.160><c> in</c><00:09:02.519><c> a</c><00:09:02.760><c> very</c>

00:09:02.870 --> 00:09:02.880 align:start position:0%
and really relationship and in a very
 

00:09:02.880 --> 00:09:04.550 align:start position:0%
and really relationship and in a very
simple<00:09:03.060><c> way</c><00:09:03.360><c> you</c><00:09:03.600><c> could</c><00:09:03.720><c> imagine</c><00:09:03.959><c> basically</c>

00:09:04.550 --> 00:09:04.560 align:start position:0%
simple way you could imagine basically
 

00:09:04.560 --> 00:09:06.530 align:start position:0%
simple way you could imagine basically
this<00:09:04.920><c> process</c><00:09:05.279><c> playing</c><00:09:05.580><c> out</c><00:09:05.820><c> in</c><00:09:06.300><c> the</c>

00:09:06.530 --> 00:09:06.540 align:start position:0%
this process playing out in the
 

00:09:06.540 --> 00:09:08.449 align:start position:0%
this process playing out in the
blockchain<00:09:06.839><c> world</c><00:09:07.080><c> is</c><00:09:07.740><c> um</c><00:09:07.740><c> and</c><00:09:07.860><c> I</c><00:09:08.100><c> guess</c><00:09:08.339><c> that</c>

00:09:08.449 --> 00:09:08.459 align:start position:0%
blockchain world is um and I guess that
 

00:09:08.459 --> 00:09:09.590 align:start position:0%
blockchain world is um and I guess that
fits<00:09:08.760><c> well</c><00:09:08.880><c> into</c><00:09:09.060><c> this</c><00:09:09.240><c> kind</c><00:09:09.420><c> of</c><00:09:09.480><c> the</c>

00:09:09.590 --> 00:09:09.600 align:start position:0%
fits well into this kind of the
 

00:09:09.600 --> 00:09:11.750 align:start position:0%
fits well into this kind of the
multi-chain<00:09:10.140><c> vision</c><00:09:10.440><c> would</c><00:09:11.040><c> be</c><00:09:11.220><c> where</c><00:09:11.459><c> every</c>

00:09:11.750 --> 00:09:11.760 align:start position:0%
multi-chain vision would be where every
 

00:09:11.760 --> 00:09:13.550 align:start position:0%
multi-chain vision would be where every
every<00:09:12.240><c> blockchain</c><00:09:12.720><c> that</c><00:09:12.959><c> wants</c><00:09:13.200><c> to</c><00:09:13.320><c> basically</c>

00:09:13.550 --> 00:09:13.560 align:start position:0%
every blockchain that wants to basically
 

00:09:13.560 --> 00:09:16.610 align:start position:0%
every blockchain that wants to basically
go<00:09:13.740><c> hyper</c><00:09:14.220><c> scaling</c><00:09:14.700><c> and</c><00:09:15.540><c> just</c><00:09:16.019><c> adds</c><00:09:16.380><c> their</c><00:09:16.500><c> own</c>

00:09:16.610 --> 00:09:16.620 align:start position:0%
go hyper scaling and just adds their own
 

00:09:16.620 --> 00:09:18.530 align:start position:0%
go hyper scaling and just adds their own
little<00:09:16.860><c> settlement</c><00:09:17.339><c> chain</c>

00:09:18.530 --> 00:09:18.540 align:start position:0%
little settlement chain
 

00:09:18.540 --> 00:09:20.210 align:start position:0%
little settlement chain
um<00:09:18.660><c> underneath</c><00:09:19.440><c> them</c>

00:09:20.210 --> 00:09:20.220 align:start position:0%
um underneath them
 

00:09:20.220 --> 00:09:21.710 align:start position:0%
um underneath them
um<00:09:20.339><c> and</c><00:09:20.580><c> that</c><00:09:20.640><c> would</c><00:09:21.000><c> basically</c><00:09:21.240><c> bring</c><00:09:21.420><c> you</c><00:09:21.540><c> to</c>

00:09:21.710 --> 00:09:21.720 align:start position:0%
um and that would basically bring you to
 

00:09:21.720 --> 00:09:23.269 align:start position:0%
um and that would basically bring you to
this<00:09:21.839><c> to</c><00:09:22.140><c> this</c><00:09:22.380><c> picture</c>

00:09:23.269 --> 00:09:23.279 align:start position:0%
this to this picture
 

00:09:23.279 --> 00:09:25.430 align:start position:0%
this to this picture
um<00:09:23.399><c> with</c><00:09:23.700><c> multiple</c><00:09:24.180><c> different</c><00:09:24.440><c> uh</c>

00:09:25.430 --> 00:09:25.440 align:start position:0%
um with multiple different uh
 

00:09:25.440 --> 00:09:27.050 align:start position:0%
um with multiple different uh
blockchains

00:09:27.050 --> 00:09:27.060 align:start position:0%
blockchains
 

00:09:27.060 --> 00:09:28.430 align:start position:0%
blockchains
um<00:09:27.120><c> they</c><00:09:27.420><c> are</c><00:09:27.600><c> that</c><00:09:27.839><c> would</c><00:09:27.959><c> all</c><00:09:28.140><c> know</c><00:09:28.260><c> have</c>

00:09:28.430 --> 00:09:28.440 align:start position:0%
um they are that would all know have
 

00:09:28.440 --> 00:09:29.870 align:start position:0%
um they are that would all know have
their<00:09:28.560><c> own</c><00:09:28.680><c> settlement</c><00:09:28.920><c> chain</c><00:09:29.160><c> the</c><00:09:29.760><c> the</c>

00:09:29.870 --> 00:09:29.880 align:start position:0%
their own settlement chain the the
 

00:09:29.880 --> 00:09:31.610 align:start position:0%
their own settlement chain the the
downside<00:09:30.360><c> there</c><00:09:30.600><c> is</c>

00:09:31.610 --> 00:09:31.620 align:start position:0%
downside there is
 

00:09:31.620 --> 00:09:34.790 align:start position:0%
downside there is
um<00:09:31.640><c> that</c><00:09:32.640><c> for</c><00:09:33.420><c> one</c><00:09:33.600><c> you</c><00:09:34.140><c> have</c><00:09:34.260><c> fractured</c>

00:09:34.790 --> 00:09:34.800 align:start position:0%
um that for one you have fractured
 

00:09:34.800 --> 00:09:36.769 align:start position:0%
um that for one you have fractured
security<00:09:34.980><c> right</c><00:09:35.339><c> each</c><00:09:35.760><c> each</c><00:09:36.120><c> settlement</c>

00:09:36.769 --> 00:09:36.779 align:start position:0%
security right each each settlement
 

00:09:36.779 --> 00:09:39.110 align:start position:0%
security right each each settlement
chain<00:09:37.019><c> has</c><00:09:37.320><c> its</c><00:09:37.620><c> own</c><00:09:37.680><c> valid</c><00:09:38.220><c> data</c><00:09:38.519><c> set</c><00:09:38.640><c> or</c><00:09:38.880><c> its</c>

00:09:39.110 --> 00:09:39.120 align:start position:0%
chain has its own valid data set or its
 

00:09:39.120 --> 00:09:40.970 align:start position:0%
chain has its own valid data set or its
own<00:09:39.180><c> miners</c><00:09:39.660><c> or</c><00:09:39.899><c> its</c><00:09:40.140><c> own</c><00:09:40.200><c> however</c><00:09:40.680><c> you</c><00:09:40.860><c> you</c>

00:09:40.970 --> 00:09:40.980 align:start position:0%
own miners or its own however you you
 

00:09:40.980 --> 00:09:44.030 align:start position:0%
own miners or its own however you you
get<00:09:41.220><c> your</c><00:09:41.339><c> security</c><00:09:41.519><c> as</c><00:09:41.940><c> your</c><00:09:42.120><c> as</c><00:09:42.540><c> your</c><00:09:42.899><c> chain</c>

00:09:44.030 --> 00:09:44.040 align:start position:0%
get your security as your as your chain
 

00:09:44.040 --> 00:09:46.910 align:start position:0%
get your security as your as your chain
um<00:09:44.160><c> and</c><00:09:44.820><c> it</c><00:09:45.180><c> basically</c><00:09:45.600><c> some</c><00:09:46.440><c> some</c><00:09:46.620><c> of</c><00:09:46.800><c> those</c>

00:09:46.910 --> 00:09:46.920 align:start position:0%
um and it basically some some of those
 

00:09:46.920 --> 00:09:48.230 align:start position:0%
um and it basically some some of those
will<00:09:47.100><c> be</c><00:09:47.279><c> higher</c><00:09:47.519><c> security</c><00:09:47.640><c> some</c><00:09:47.940><c> will</c><00:09:48.120><c> be</c>

00:09:48.230 --> 00:09:48.240 align:start position:0%
will be higher security some will be
 

00:09:48.240 --> 00:09:49.970 align:start position:0%
will be higher security some will be
lower<00:09:48.360><c> security</c><00:09:48.660><c> and</c><00:09:49.260><c> that</c><00:09:49.380><c> also</c><00:09:49.680><c> affects</c>

00:09:49.970 --> 00:09:49.980 align:start position:0%
lower security and that also affects
 

00:09:49.980 --> 00:09:52.550 align:start position:0%
lower security and that also affects
Bridges<00:09:50.399><c> uh</c><00:09:51.000><c> I'm</c><00:09:51.420><c> maybe</c><00:09:52.019><c> some</c><00:09:52.200><c> of</c><00:09:52.320><c> you</c><00:09:52.380><c> have</c>

00:09:52.550 --> 00:09:52.560 align:start position:0%
Bridges uh I'm maybe some of you have
 

00:09:52.560 --> 00:09:54.170 align:start position:0%
Bridges uh I'm maybe some of you have
seen<00:09:52.800><c> kind</c><00:09:52.980><c> of</c><00:09:53.100><c> metallics</c><00:09:53.519><c> right</c><00:09:53.760><c> up</c><00:09:53.880><c> a</c><00:09:54.060><c> while</c>

00:09:54.170 --> 00:09:54.180 align:start position:0%
seen kind of metallics right up a while
 

00:09:54.180 --> 00:09:55.730 align:start position:0%
seen kind of metallics right up a while
ago<00:09:54.420><c> about</c><00:09:54.600><c> how</c><00:09:54.959><c> basically</c><00:09:55.260><c> if</c><00:09:55.440><c> you</c><00:09:55.560><c> bridge</c>

00:09:55.730 --> 00:09:55.740 align:start position:0%
ago about how basically if you bridge
 

00:09:55.740 --> 00:09:57.110 align:start position:0%
ago about how basically if you bridge
multiple<00:09:56.100><c> chains</c><00:09:56.459><c> you</c><00:09:56.519><c> always</c><00:09:56.640><c> end</c><00:09:56.880><c> up</c><00:09:56.940><c> with</c>

00:09:57.110 --> 00:09:57.120 align:start position:0%
multiple chains you always end up with
 

00:09:57.120 --> 00:09:59.509 align:start position:0%
multiple chains you always end up with
the<00:09:57.839><c> the</c><00:09:58.019><c> weaker</c><00:09:58.440><c> secure</c><00:09:58.740><c> the</c><00:09:58.920><c> weakest</c>

00:09:59.509 --> 00:09:59.519 align:start position:0%
the the weaker secure the weakest
 

00:09:59.519 --> 00:10:02.090 align:start position:0%
the the weaker secure the weakest
security<00:10:00.300><c> of</c><00:10:00.720><c> all</c><00:10:00.839><c> of</c><00:10:00.959><c> them</c><00:10:01.260><c> right</c><00:10:01.740><c> if</c><00:10:01.980><c> you</c>

00:10:02.090 --> 00:10:02.100 align:start position:0%
security of all of them right if you
 

00:10:02.100 --> 00:10:03.710 align:start position:0%
security of all of them right if you
basically<00:10:02.339><c> if</c><00:10:02.459><c> you</c><00:10:02.640><c> want</c><00:10:02.700><c> to</c><00:10:02.820><c> use</c><00:10:03.120><c> assets</c><00:10:03.540><c> of</c>

00:10:03.710 --> 00:10:03.720 align:start position:0%
basically if you want to use assets of
 

00:10:03.720 --> 00:10:05.329 align:start position:0%
basically if you want to use assets of
like<00:10:03.899><c> 10</c><00:10:04.080><c> different</c><00:10:04.260><c> chains</c>

00:10:05.329 --> 00:10:05.339 align:start position:0%
like 10 different chains
 

00:10:05.339 --> 00:10:07.550 align:start position:0%
like 10 different chains
if<00:10:06.240><c> the</c><00:10:06.420><c> security</c><00:10:06.540><c> of</c><00:10:06.779><c> one</c><00:10:06.959><c> of</c><00:10:07.080><c> those</c><00:10:07.140><c> breaks</c>

00:10:07.550 --> 00:10:07.560 align:start position:0%
if the security of one of those breaks
 

00:10:07.560 --> 00:10:09.650 align:start position:0%
if the security of one of those breaks
like<00:10:07.800><c> that</c><00:10:08.040><c> specific</c><00:10:08.279><c> asset</c><00:10:09.060><c> just</c><00:10:09.300><c> basically</c>

00:10:09.650 --> 00:10:09.660 align:start position:0%
like that specific asset just basically
 

00:10:09.660 --> 00:10:12.110 align:start position:0%
like that specific asset just basically
is<00:10:09.779><c> is</c><00:10:09.959><c> broken</c><00:10:10.560><c> for</c><00:10:10.800><c> you</c><00:10:10.920><c> right</c><00:10:11.160><c> and</c><00:10:11.700><c> if</c><00:10:12.000><c> you</c>

00:10:12.110 --> 00:10:12.120 align:start position:0%
is is broken for you right and if you
 

00:10:12.120 --> 00:10:13.190 align:start position:0%
is is broken for you right and if you
have<00:10:12.240><c> some</c><00:10:12.360><c> sort</c><00:10:12.480><c> of</c><00:10:12.540><c> defense</c><00:10:12.839><c> system</c><00:10:13.019><c> where</c>

00:10:13.190 --> 00:10:13.200 align:start position:0%
have some sort of defense system where
 

00:10:13.200 --> 00:10:14.449 align:start position:0%
have some sort of defense system where
all<00:10:13.380><c> of</c><00:10:13.500><c> this</c><00:10:13.620><c> is</c><00:10:13.740><c> interconnected</c><00:10:14.160><c> basically</c>

00:10:14.449 --> 00:10:14.459 align:start position:0%
all of this is interconnected basically
 

00:10:14.459 --> 00:10:16.430 align:start position:0%
all of this is interconnected basically
everything<00:10:14.760><c> Can</c><00:10:15.000><c> Crash</c><00:10:15.240><c> and</c><00:10:15.360><c> Burn</c>

00:10:16.430 --> 00:10:16.440 align:start position:0%
everything Can Crash and Burn
 

00:10:16.440 --> 00:10:18.050 align:start position:0%
everything Can Crash and Burn
um<00:10:16.560><c> you</c><00:10:16.860><c> really</c><00:10:16.980><c> don't</c><00:10:17.160><c> want</c><00:10:17.399><c> this</c><00:10:17.580><c> minimum</c>

00:10:18.050 --> 00:10:18.060 align:start position:0%
um you really don't want this minimum
 

00:10:18.060 --> 00:10:19.910 align:start position:0%
um you really don't want this minimum
the<00:10:18.480><c> worst</c><00:10:18.839><c> of</c><00:10:18.959><c> all</c><00:10:19.140><c> security</c><00:10:19.380><c> kind</c><00:10:19.800><c> of</c>

00:10:19.910 --> 00:10:19.920 align:start position:0%
the worst of all security kind of
 

00:10:19.920 --> 00:10:22.550 align:start position:0%
the worst of all security kind of
situations<00:10:20.339><c> and</c><00:10:21.180><c> also</c><00:10:22.019><c> um</c><00:10:22.080><c> I</c><00:10:22.260><c> guess</c><00:10:22.380><c> that's</c>

00:10:22.550 --> 00:10:22.560 align:start position:0%
situations and also um I guess that's
 

00:10:22.560 --> 00:10:25.610 align:start position:0%
situations and also um I guess that's
less<00:10:22.800><c> of</c><00:10:23.339><c> a</c><00:10:23.399><c> severe</c><00:10:23.760><c> thing</c><00:10:24.060><c> but</c><00:10:24.360><c> also</c><00:10:24.660><c> in</c><00:10:25.500><c> this</c>

00:10:25.610 --> 00:10:25.620 align:start position:0%
less of a severe thing but also in this
 

00:10:25.620 --> 00:10:27.110 align:start position:0%
less of a severe thing but also in this
picture<00:10:25.740><c> you're</c><00:10:26.040><c> kind</c><00:10:26.220><c> of</c><00:10:26.279><c> duplicating</c><00:10:26.700><c> a</c><00:10:27.000><c> lot</c>

00:10:27.110 --> 00:10:27.120 align:start position:0%
picture you're kind of duplicating a lot
 

00:10:27.120 --> 00:10:28.430 align:start position:0%
picture you're kind of duplicating a lot
of<00:10:27.180><c> complexity</c>

00:10:28.430 --> 00:10:28.440 align:start position:0%
of complexity
 

00:10:28.440 --> 00:10:30.829 align:start position:0%
of complexity
um<00:10:28.500><c> for</c><00:10:29.339><c> each</c><00:10:29.459><c> chain</c><00:10:29.700><c> so</c><00:10:30.300><c> what</c><00:10:30.480><c> would</c><00:10:30.600><c> be</c><00:10:30.720><c> an</c>

00:10:30.829 --> 00:10:30.839 align:start position:0%
um for each chain so what would be an
 

00:10:30.839 --> 00:10:32.870 align:start position:0%
um for each chain so what would be an
alternative<00:10:31.200><c> Vision</c><00:10:31.440><c> how</c><00:10:31.680><c> do</c><00:10:31.860><c> we</c><00:10:32.040><c> think</c><00:10:32.640><c> the</c>

00:10:32.870 --> 00:10:32.880 align:start position:0%
alternative Vision how do we think the
 

00:10:32.880 --> 00:10:35.030 align:start position:0%
alternative Vision how do we think the
future<00:10:33.000><c> might</c><00:10:33.300><c> look</c><00:10:33.540><c> like</c><00:10:33.720><c> uh</c><00:10:34.560><c> that's</c><00:10:34.740><c> what</c><00:10:34.920><c> we</c>

00:10:35.030 --> 00:10:35.040 align:start position:0%
future might look like uh that's what we
 

00:10:35.040 --> 00:10:36.769 align:start position:0%
future might look like uh that's what we
what<00:10:35.279><c> we</c><00:10:35.399><c> call</c><00:10:35.519><c> like</c><00:10:35.640><c> a</c><00:10:35.820><c> shared</c><00:10:36.180><c> a</c><00:10:36.420><c> settlement</c>

00:10:36.769 --> 00:10:36.779 align:start position:0%
what we call like a shared a settlement
 

00:10:36.779 --> 00:10:39.470 align:start position:0%
what we call like a shared a settlement
chain<00:10:37.019><c> so</c><00:10:37.740><c> in</c><00:10:37.860><c> this</c><00:10:37.980><c> case</c><00:10:38.100><c> you</c><00:10:38.399><c> have</c><00:10:38.580><c> one</c><00:10:39.180><c> big</c>

00:10:39.470 --> 00:10:39.480 align:start position:0%
chain so in this case you have one big
 

00:10:39.480 --> 00:10:41.449 align:start position:0%
chain so in this case you have one big
settlement<00:10:39.899><c> chain</c><00:10:40.200><c> and</c><00:10:40.920><c> you</c><00:10:41.220><c> can</c><00:10:41.339><c> have</c>

00:10:41.449 --> 00:10:41.459 align:start position:0%
settlement chain and you can have
 

00:10:41.459 --> 00:10:42.949 align:start position:0%
settlement chain and you can have
multiple<00:10:41.820><c> Roll-Ups</c><00:10:42.300><c> on</c><00:10:42.360><c> top</c><00:10:42.540><c> of</c><00:10:42.779><c> course</c>

00:10:42.949 --> 00:10:42.959 align:start position:0%
multiple Roll-Ups on top of course
 

00:10:42.959 --> 00:10:44.870 align:start position:0%
multiple Roll-Ups on top of course
probably<00:10:43.440><c> realistically</c><00:10:44.220><c> the</c><00:10:44.519><c> future</c><00:10:44.640><c> will</c>

00:10:44.870 --> 00:10:44.880 align:start position:0%
probably realistically the future will
 

00:10:44.880 --> 00:10:46.250 align:start position:0%
probably realistically the future will
look<00:10:45.060><c> some</c><00:10:45.240><c> sort</c><00:10:45.420><c> like</c><00:10:45.600><c> some</c><00:10:45.779><c> sort</c><00:10:45.899><c> of</c><00:10:45.959><c> hybrid</c>

00:10:46.250 --> 00:10:46.260 align:start position:0%
look some sort like some sort of hybrid
 

00:10:46.260 --> 00:10:47.930 align:start position:0%
look some sort like some sort of hybrid
you'll<00:10:46.560><c> still</c><00:10:46.680><c> have</c><00:10:46.860><c> some</c><00:10:47.160><c> blockchains</c>

00:10:47.930 --> 00:10:47.940 align:start position:0%
you'll still have some blockchains
 

00:10:47.940 --> 00:10:49.130 align:start position:0%
you'll still have some blockchains
that's<00:10:48.000><c> prefer</c><00:10:48.360><c> to</c><00:10:48.540><c> do</c><00:10:48.600><c> their</c><00:10:48.720><c> own</c><00:10:48.839><c> settlement</c>

00:10:49.130 --> 00:10:49.140 align:start position:0%
that's prefer to do their own settlement
 

00:10:49.140 --> 00:10:51.650 align:start position:0%
that's prefer to do their own settlement
chain<00:10:49.320><c> but</c><00:10:49.560><c> but</c><00:10:50.040><c> we</c><00:10:50.760><c> predict</c><00:10:51.000><c> that</c><00:10:51.180><c> like</c><00:10:51.420><c> this</c>

00:10:51.650 --> 00:10:51.660 align:start position:0%
chain but but we predict that like this
 

00:10:51.660 --> 00:10:53.690 align:start position:0%
chain but but we predict that like this
will<00:10:51.839><c> be</c><00:10:52.079><c> a</c><00:10:52.380><c> big</c><00:10:52.500><c> chunk</c><00:10:52.680><c> of</c><00:10:52.860><c> it</c><00:10:52.980><c> basically</c><00:10:53.279><c> like</c>

00:10:53.690 --> 00:10:53.700 align:start position:0%
will be a big chunk of it basically like
 

00:10:53.700 --> 00:10:56.090 align:start position:0%
will be a big chunk of it basically like
a<00:10:54.060><c> shared</c><00:10:54.660><c> settlement</c><00:10:55.019><c> chain</c><00:10:55.260><c> and</c><00:10:55.620><c> why</c><00:10:55.740><c> is</c>

00:10:56.090 --> 00:10:56.100 align:start position:0%
a shared settlement chain and why is
 

00:10:56.100 --> 00:10:58.310 align:start position:0%
a shared settlement chain and why is
that<00:10:56.279><c> advantages</c>

00:10:58.310 --> 00:10:58.320 align:start position:0%
that advantages
 

00:10:58.320 --> 00:11:00.590 align:start position:0%
that advantages
um well<00:10:58.560><c> two</c><00:10:58.860><c> main</c><00:10:59.040><c> points</c><00:10:59.519><c> really</c>

00:11:00.590 --> 00:11:00.600 align:start position:0%
um well two main points really
 

00:11:00.600 --> 00:11:03.530 align:start position:0%
um well two main points really
um<00:11:00.660><c> one</c><00:11:01.019><c> is</c><00:11:01.320><c> the</c><00:11:01.740><c> shared</c><00:11:02.160><c> security</c>

00:11:03.530 --> 00:11:03.540 align:start position:0%
um one is the shared security
 

00:11:03.540 --> 00:11:04.910 align:start position:0%
um one is the shared security
um<00:11:03.600><c> I</c><00:11:03.720><c> like</c><00:11:03.899><c> to</c><00:11:04.019><c> think</c><00:11:04.140><c> about</c><00:11:04.260><c> it</c><00:11:04.440><c> like</c><00:11:04.560><c> shared</c>

00:11:04.910 --> 00:11:04.920 align:start position:0%
um I like to think about it like shared
 

00:11:04.920 --> 00:11:06.889 align:start position:0%
um I like to think about it like shared
pools<00:11:05.160><c> security</c><00:11:05.459><c> it's</c><00:11:06.120><c> not</c><00:11:06.300><c> quite</c><00:11:06.540><c> free</c>

00:11:06.889 --> 00:11:06.899 align:start position:0%
pools security it's not quite free
 

00:11:06.899 --> 00:11:08.569 align:start position:0%
pools security it's not quite free
security<00:11:07.200><c> sometimes</c><00:11:07.740><c> you</c><00:11:07.920><c> hear</c><00:11:08.160><c> people</c><00:11:08.399><c> talk</c>

00:11:08.569 --> 00:11:08.579 align:start position:0%
security sometimes you hear people talk
 

00:11:08.579 --> 00:11:10.190 align:start position:0%
security sometimes you hear people talk
about<00:11:08.700><c> how</c><00:11:09.000><c> if</c><00:11:09.240><c> you</c><00:11:09.420><c> if</c><00:11:09.600><c> you</c><00:11:09.779><c> turn</c><00:11:09.899><c> your</c><00:11:10.019><c> chain</c>

00:11:10.190 --> 00:11:10.200 align:start position:0%
about how if you if you turn your chain
 

00:11:10.200 --> 00:11:12.050 align:start position:0%
about how if you if you turn your chain
into<00:11:10.320><c> a</c><00:11:10.560><c> roll</c><00:11:10.680><c> up</c><00:11:10.860><c> you</c><00:11:11.220><c> just</c><00:11:11.339><c> get</c><00:11:11.579><c> the</c><00:11:11.820><c> the</c>

00:11:12.050 --> 00:11:12.060 align:start position:0%
into a roll up you just get the the
 

00:11:12.060 --> 00:11:14.210 align:start position:0%
into a roll up you just get the the
security<00:11:12.300><c> of</c><00:11:12.600><c> the</c><00:11:12.720><c> base</c><00:11:12.839><c> chain</c><00:11:13.079><c> for</c><00:11:13.380><c> free</c><00:11:13.560><c> and</c>

00:11:14.210 --> 00:11:14.220 align:start position:0%
security of the base chain for free and
 

00:11:14.220 --> 00:11:15.889 align:start position:0%
security of the base chain for free and
that's<00:11:14.519><c> not</c><00:11:14.700><c> quite</c><00:11:14.940><c> right</c><00:11:15.180><c> I</c><00:11:15.480><c> think</c><00:11:15.600><c> because</c>

00:11:15.889 --> 00:11:15.899 align:start position:0%
that's not quite right I think because
 

00:11:15.899 --> 00:11:19.009 align:start position:0%
that's not quite right I think because
actually<00:11:16.519><c> if</c><00:11:17.519><c> uh</c><00:11:18.000><c> say</c><00:11:18.240><c> you</c><00:11:18.360><c> have</c><00:11:18.480><c> 10</c><00:11:18.600><c> Roll-Ups</c>

00:11:19.009 --> 00:11:19.019 align:start position:0%
actually if uh say you have 10 Roll-Ups
 

00:11:19.019 --> 00:11:20.210 align:start position:0%
actually if uh say you have 10 Roll-Ups
on<00:11:19.079><c> top</c><00:11:19.200><c> of</c><00:11:19.260><c> a</c><00:11:19.380><c> settlement</c><00:11:19.620><c> chain</c><00:11:19.800><c> then</c><00:11:19.980><c> they</c>

00:11:20.210 --> 00:11:20.220 align:start position:0%
on top of a settlement chain then they
 

00:11:20.220 --> 00:11:22.490 align:start position:0%
on top of a settlement chain then they
basically<00:11:20.519><c> all</c><00:11:20.760><c> put</c><00:11:21.060><c> additional</c><00:11:21.779><c> strain</c><00:11:22.260><c> on</c>

00:11:22.490 --> 00:11:22.500 align:start position:0%
basically all put additional strain on
 

00:11:22.500 --> 00:11:24.050 align:start position:0%
basically all put additional strain on
top<00:11:22.620><c> of</c><00:11:22.800><c> that</c><00:11:22.980><c> settlement</c><00:11:23.399><c> chain</c><00:11:23.579><c> right</c><00:11:23.820><c> like</c>

00:11:24.050 --> 00:11:24.060 align:start position:0%
top of that settlement chain right like
 

00:11:24.060 --> 00:11:25.370 align:start position:0%
top of that settlement chain right like
now<00:11:24.420><c> the</c><00:11:24.600><c> incentive</c><00:11:24.899><c> to</c><00:11:25.019><c> attack</c><00:11:25.140><c> the</c>

00:11:25.370 --> 00:11:25.380 align:start position:0%
now the incentive to attack the
 

00:11:25.380 --> 00:11:27.530 align:start position:0%
now the incentive to attack the
settlement<00:11:25.620><c> chain</c><00:11:25.800><c> is</c><00:11:25.980><c> 10x</c><00:11:26.279><c> as</c><00:11:26.459><c> high</c><00:11:26.640><c> so</c><00:11:27.240><c> you</c>

00:11:27.530 --> 00:11:27.540 align:start position:0%
settlement chain is 10x as high so you
 

00:11:27.540 --> 00:11:29.509 align:start position:0%
settlement chain is 10x as high so you
you<00:11:27.839><c> don't</c><00:11:28.079><c> just</c><00:11:28.320><c> get</c><00:11:28.560><c> like</c><00:11:28.980><c> security</c><00:11:29.160><c> doesn't</c>

00:11:29.509 --> 00:11:29.519 align:start position:0%
you don't just get like security doesn't
 

00:11:29.519 --> 00:11:31.430 align:start position:0%
you don't just get like security doesn't
just<00:11:29.700><c> you</c><00:11:29.880><c> know</c><00:11:30.060><c> isn't</c><00:11:30.839><c> just</c><00:11:30.959><c> created</c><00:11:31.260><c> for</c>

00:11:31.430 --> 00:11:31.440 align:start position:0%
just you know isn't just created for
 

00:11:31.440 --> 00:11:32.569 align:start position:0%
just you know isn't just created for
free

00:11:32.569 --> 00:11:32.579 align:start position:0%
free
 

00:11:32.579 --> 00:11:35.030 align:start position:0%
free
um<00:11:32.640><c> but</c><00:11:32.940><c> it</c><00:11:33.120><c> is</c><00:11:33.480><c> pooled</c><00:11:33.959><c> right</c><00:11:34.260><c> so</c><00:11:34.560><c> so</c><00:11:34.860><c> now</c>

00:11:35.030 --> 00:11:35.040 align:start position:0%
um but it is pooled right so so now
 

00:11:35.040 --> 00:11:36.829 align:start position:0%
um but it is pooled right so so now
basically<00:11:35.399><c> you</c><00:11:35.880><c> have</c><00:11:36.000><c> to</c><00:11:36.120><c> break</c><00:11:36.300><c> the</c><00:11:36.540><c> entire</c>

00:11:36.829 --> 00:11:36.839 align:start position:0%
basically you have to break the entire
 

00:11:36.839 --> 00:11:38.630 align:start position:0%
basically you have to break the entire
combined<00:11:37.440><c> system</c><00:11:37.560><c> instead</c><00:11:37.980><c> of</c><00:11:38.100><c> just</c><00:11:38.339><c> being</c>

00:11:38.630 --> 00:11:38.640 align:start position:0%
combined system instead of just being
 

00:11:38.640 --> 00:11:41.269 align:start position:0%
combined system instead of just being
able<00:11:38.820><c> to</c><00:11:38.940><c> take</c><00:11:39.180><c> the</c><00:11:39.360><c> weakest</c><00:11:39.720><c> link</c><00:11:39.899><c> and</c><00:11:40.800><c> what</c>

00:11:41.269 --> 00:11:41.279 align:start position:0%
able to take the weakest link and what
 

00:11:41.279 --> 00:11:43.069 align:start position:0%
able to take the weakest link and what
that<00:11:41.459><c> also</c><00:11:41.940><c> gives</c><00:11:42.000><c> you</c><00:11:42.180><c> is</c><00:11:42.300><c> then</c><00:11:42.480><c> because</c><00:11:42.720><c> you</c>

00:11:43.069 --> 00:11:43.079 align:start position:0%
that also gives you is then because you
 

00:11:43.079 --> 00:11:45.230 align:start position:0%
that also gives you is then because you
have<00:11:43.200><c> like</c><00:11:43.440><c> one</c><00:11:43.800><c> shared</c><00:11:44.220><c> trust</c>

00:11:45.230 --> 00:11:45.240 align:start position:0%
have like one shared trust
 

00:11:45.240 --> 00:11:47.870 align:start position:0%
have like one shared trust
um<00:11:45.300><c> trust</c><00:11:46.200><c> Zone</c><00:11:46.440><c> basically</c><00:11:46.920><c> that</c><00:11:47.459><c> all</c><00:11:47.700><c> the</c>

00:11:47.870 --> 00:11:47.880 align:start position:0%
um trust Zone basically that all the
 

00:11:47.880 --> 00:11:49.550 align:start position:0%
um trust Zone basically that all the
bridges<00:11:48.120><c> between</c><00:11:48.300><c> those</c><00:11:48.600><c> roll</c><00:11:48.779><c> ups</c><00:11:49.140><c> if</c>

00:11:49.550 --> 00:11:49.560 align:start position:0%
bridges between those roll ups if
 

00:11:49.560 --> 00:11:52.370 align:start position:0%
bridges between those roll ups if
implemented<00:11:50.160><c> perfectly</c><00:11:51.060><c> you</c><00:11:51.420><c> know</c><00:11:51.540><c> in</c><00:11:52.140><c> front</c>

00:11:52.370 --> 00:11:52.380 align:start position:0%
implemented perfectly you know in front
 

00:11:52.380 --> 00:11:53.750 align:start position:0%
implemented perfectly you know in front
caveat

00:11:53.750 --> 00:11:53.760 align:start position:0%
caveat
 

00:11:53.760 --> 00:11:57.410 align:start position:0%
caveat
um<00:11:53.880><c> it</c><00:11:54.240><c> can</c><00:11:54.360><c> can</c><00:11:54.540><c> be</c><00:11:54.839><c> you</c><00:11:54.959><c> can</c><00:11:55.140><c> be</c><00:11:55.260><c> fully</c><00:11:55.560><c> secure</c>

00:11:57.410 --> 00:11:57.420 align:start position:0%
um it can can be you can be fully secure
 

00:11:57.420 --> 00:11:59.509 align:start position:0%
um it can can be you can be fully secure
um okay<00:11:57.839><c> so</c><00:11:58.019><c> with</c><00:11:58.320><c> that</c><00:11:58.500><c> kind</c><00:11:58.920><c> of</c><00:11:59.040><c> bringing</c><00:11:59.459><c> it</c>

00:11:59.509 --> 00:11:59.519 align:start position:0%
um okay so with that kind of bringing it
 

00:11:59.519 --> 00:12:01.730 align:start position:0%
um okay so with that kind of bringing it
back<00:11:59.700><c> to</c><00:11:59.820><c> ethereum</c><00:12:00.600><c> of</c><00:12:00.720><c> course</c><00:12:00.839><c> I</c><00:12:01.019><c> guess</c><00:12:01.380><c> the</c>

00:12:01.730 --> 00:12:01.740 align:start position:0%
back to ethereum of course I guess the
 

00:12:01.740 --> 00:12:03.110 align:start position:0%
back to ethereum of course I guess the
last<00:12:01.920><c> slide</c><00:12:02.279><c> they're</c><00:12:02.399><c> heavily</c><00:12:02.700><c> hinted</c><00:12:03.000><c> to</c>

00:12:03.110 --> 00:12:03.120 align:start position:0%
last slide they're heavily hinted to
 

00:12:03.120 --> 00:12:05.030 align:start position:0%
last slide they're heavily hinted to
where<00:12:03.240><c> we</c><00:12:03.420><c> want</c><00:12:03.480><c> to</c><00:12:03.600><c> end</c><00:12:03.779><c> up</c><00:12:03.959><c> with</c><00:12:04.140><c> at</c><00:12:04.680><c> but</c>

00:12:05.030 --> 00:12:05.040 align:start position:0%
where we want to end up with at but
 

00:12:05.040 --> 00:12:06.889 align:start position:0%
where we want to end up with at but
where<00:12:05.700><c> where</c><00:12:05.820><c> were</c><00:12:06.360><c> we</c><00:12:06.420><c> in</c><00:12:06.540><c> the</c><00:12:06.660><c> past</c><00:12:06.720><c> where</c>

00:12:06.889 --> 00:12:06.899 align:start position:0%
where where were we in the past where
 

00:12:06.899 --> 00:12:08.990 align:start position:0%
where where were we in the past where
are<00:12:07.079><c> we</c><00:12:07.200><c> today</c><00:12:07.320><c> and</c><00:12:07.560><c> how</c><00:12:08.100><c> how</c><00:12:08.279><c> could</c><00:12:08.519><c> we</c><00:12:08.700><c> get</c><00:12:08.820><c> to</c>

00:12:08.990 --> 00:12:09.000 align:start position:0%
are we today and how how could we get to
 

00:12:09.000 --> 00:12:12.110 align:start position:0%
are we today and how how could we get to
this<00:12:09.240><c> shared</c><00:12:09.959><c> settlement</c><00:12:10.500><c> layer</c><00:12:10.980><c> future</c><00:12:11.279><c> so</c>

00:12:12.110 --> 00:12:12.120 align:start position:0%
this shared settlement layer future so
 

00:12:12.120 --> 00:12:13.850 align:start position:0%
this shared settlement layer future so
kind<00:12:12.360><c> of</c><00:12:12.480><c> starting</c><00:12:12.660><c> with</c><00:12:13.079><c> ethereum</c><00:12:13.560><c> a</c><00:12:13.740><c> few</c>

00:12:13.850 --> 00:12:13.860 align:start position:0%
kind of starting with ethereum a few
 

00:12:13.860 --> 00:12:15.650 align:start position:0%
kind of starting with ethereum a few
years<00:12:13.980><c> ago</c><00:12:14.279><c> uh</c><00:12:14.700><c> in</c><00:12:15.000><c> the</c><00:12:15.060><c> early</c><00:12:15.120><c> days</c><00:12:15.300><c> basically</c>

00:12:15.650 --> 00:12:15.660 align:start position:0%
years ago uh in the early days basically
 

00:12:15.660 --> 00:12:17.569 align:start position:0%
years ago uh in the early days basically
ethereum<00:12:16.079><c> also</c><00:12:16.380><c> was</c><00:12:16.500><c> a</c><00:12:16.680><c> pure</c><00:12:16.860><c> execution</c><00:12:17.279><c> chain</c>

00:12:17.569 --> 00:12:17.579 align:start position:0%
ethereum also was a pure execution chain
 

00:12:17.579 --> 00:12:20.269 align:start position:0%
ethereum also was a pure execution chain
we<00:12:18.180><c> had</c><00:12:18.360><c> approved</c><00:12:18.839><c> work</c><00:12:19.019><c> security</c><00:12:19.279><c> robs</c>

00:12:20.269 --> 00:12:20.279 align:start position:0%
we had approved work security robs
 

00:12:20.279 --> 00:12:21.949 align:start position:0%
we had approved work security robs
weren't<00:12:20.459><c> yet</c><00:12:20.640><c> a</c><00:12:20.820><c> thing</c><00:12:20.940><c> that</c><00:12:21.540><c> was</c><00:12:21.660><c> kind</c><00:12:21.779><c> of</c><00:12:21.899><c> a</c>

00:12:21.949 --> 00:12:21.959 align:start position:0%
weren't yet a thing that was kind of a
 

00:12:21.959 --> 00:12:23.630 align:start position:0%
weren't yet a thing that was kind of a
happy<00:12:22.079><c> place</c><00:12:22.320><c> to</c><00:12:22.560><c> be</c><00:12:22.680><c> in</c><00:12:22.800><c> for</c><00:12:23.100><c> for</c><00:12:23.160><c> a</c><00:12:23.519><c> couple</c>

00:12:23.630 --> 00:12:23.640 align:start position:0%
happy place to be in for for a couple
 

00:12:23.640 --> 00:12:24.829 align:start position:0%
happy place to be in for for a couple
years

00:12:24.829 --> 00:12:24.839 align:start position:0%
years
 

00:12:24.839 --> 00:12:27.050 align:start position:0%
years
um at<00:12:25.260><c> some</c><00:12:25.380><c> point</c><00:12:25.500><c> of</c><00:12:25.800><c> course</c><00:12:25.920><c> like</c><00:12:26.339><c> ethereum</c>

00:12:27.050 --> 00:12:27.060 align:start position:0%
um at some point of course like ethereum
 

00:12:27.060 --> 00:12:28.670 align:start position:0%
um at some point of course like ethereum
always<00:12:27.240><c> wanted</c><00:12:27.480><c> to</c><00:12:27.660><c> figure</c><00:12:27.839><c> out</c><00:12:28.019><c> like</c><00:12:28.260><c> how</c><00:12:28.500><c> do</c>

00:12:28.670 --> 00:12:28.680 align:start position:0%
always wanted to figure out like how do
 

00:12:28.680 --> 00:12:30.370 align:start position:0%
always wanted to figure out like how do
we<00:12:28.860><c> actually</c><00:12:28.980><c> scale</c><00:12:29.279><c> to</c><00:12:29.519><c> billions</c><00:12:29.880><c> of</c><00:12:30.000><c> users</c>

00:12:30.370 --> 00:12:30.380 align:start position:0%
we actually scale to billions of users
 

00:12:30.380 --> 00:12:33.290 align:start position:0%
we actually scale to billions of users
uh<00:12:31.380><c> it</c><00:12:31.740><c> took</c><00:12:32.040><c> quite</c><00:12:32.279><c> a</c><00:12:32.399><c> while</c><00:12:32.579><c> quite</c><00:12:33.120><c> a</c><00:12:33.240><c> few</c>

00:12:33.290 --> 00:12:33.300 align:start position:0%
uh it took quite a while quite a few
 

00:12:33.300 --> 00:12:35.329 align:start position:0%
uh it took quite a while quite a few
years<00:12:33.480><c> of</c><00:12:33.660><c> iterations</c><00:12:34.019><c> in</c><00:12:34.320><c> in</c><00:12:34.620><c> iterations</c>

00:12:35.329 --> 00:12:35.339 align:start position:0%
years of iterations in in iterations
 

00:12:35.339 --> 00:12:37.550 align:start position:0%
years of iterations in in iterations
just<00:12:36.000><c> because</c><00:12:36.120><c> I</c><00:12:36.480><c> like</c><00:12:36.660><c> kind</c><00:12:37.019><c> of</c><00:12:37.140><c> research</c>

00:12:37.550 --> 00:12:37.560 align:start position:0%
just because I like kind of research
 

00:12:37.560 --> 00:12:39.590 align:start position:0%
just because I like kind of research
archeology<00:12:38.100><c> and</c><00:12:38.459><c> I</c><00:12:38.579><c> would</c><00:12:38.880><c> encourage</c><00:12:39.360><c> you</c><00:12:39.480><c> if</c>

00:12:39.590 --> 00:12:39.600 align:start position:0%
archeology and I would encourage you if
 

00:12:39.600 --> 00:12:40.850 align:start position:0%
archeology and I would encourage you if
you<00:12:39.720><c> ever</c><00:12:39.839><c> have</c><00:12:40.019><c> some</c><00:12:40.200><c> free</c><00:12:40.380><c> time</c><00:12:40.500><c> and</c><00:12:40.740><c> nothing</c>

00:12:40.850 --> 00:12:40.860 align:start position:0%
you ever have some free time and nothing
 

00:12:40.860 --> 00:12:43.069 align:start position:0%
you ever have some free time and nothing
else<00:12:41.100><c> to</c><00:12:41.220><c> do</c><00:12:41.399><c> uh</c><00:12:42.120><c> go</c><00:12:42.300><c> look</c><00:12:42.480><c> at</c><00:12:42.660><c> all</c><00:12:42.779><c> research</c>

00:12:43.069 --> 00:12:43.079 align:start position:0%
else to do uh go look at all research
 

00:12:43.079 --> 00:12:45.170 align:start position:0%
else to do uh go look at all research
posts<00:12:43.380><c> it's</c><00:12:43.500><c> always</c><00:12:43.680><c> fun</c><00:12:43.920><c> so</c><00:12:44.579><c> to</c><00:12:44.880><c> basically</c>

00:12:45.170 --> 00:12:45.180 align:start position:0%
posts it's always fun so to basically
 

00:12:45.180 --> 00:12:46.550 align:start position:0%
posts it's always fun so to basically
just<00:12:45.300><c> illustrate</c><00:12:45.779><c> that</c><00:12:45.899><c> a</c><00:12:46.079><c> little</c><00:12:46.139><c> bit</c><00:12:46.260><c> I've</c>

00:12:46.550 --> 00:12:46.560 align:start position:0%
just illustrate that a little bit I've
 

00:12:46.560 --> 00:12:48.410 align:start position:0%
just illustrate that a little bit I've
like<00:12:46.860><c> picked</c><00:12:47.519><c> like</c><00:12:47.579><c> three</c><00:12:47.820><c> that</c><00:12:48.120><c> kind</c><00:12:48.300><c> of</c>

00:12:48.410 --> 00:12:48.420 align:start position:0%
like picked like three that kind of
 

00:12:48.420 --> 00:12:50.810 align:start position:0%
like picked like three that kind of
accompanied<00:12:49.019><c> our</c><00:12:49.380><c> way</c><00:12:49.620><c> kind</c><00:12:49.920><c> of</c><00:12:49.980><c> towards</c><00:12:50.459><c> this</c>

00:12:50.810 --> 00:12:50.820 align:start position:0%
accompanied our way kind of towards this
 

00:12:50.820 --> 00:12:53.389 align:start position:0%
accompanied our way kind of towards this
this<00:12:51.060><c> rural</c><00:12:51.540><c> Vision</c><00:12:51.779><c> the</c><00:12:52.380><c> first</c><00:12:52.560><c> one</c><00:12:52.740><c> is</c><00:12:53.220><c> if</c>

00:12:53.389 --> 00:12:53.399 align:start position:0%
this rural Vision the first one is if
 

00:12:53.399 --> 00:12:57.110 align:start position:0%
this rural Vision the first one is if
you<00:12:53.579><c> look</c><00:12:53.760><c> April</c><00:12:54.300><c> 2019</c><00:12:55.279><c> it's</c><00:12:56.279><c> it's</c><00:12:56.760><c> really</c>

00:12:57.110 --> 00:12:57.120 align:start position:0%
you look April 2019 it's it's really
 

00:12:57.120 --> 00:12:59.150 align:start position:0%
you look April 2019 it's it's really
quite<00:12:57.300><c> amazing</c><00:12:57.660><c> kcd</c><00:12:58.260><c> Trio</c><00:12:58.560><c> phase</c><00:12:58.800><c> one</c><00:12:58.980><c> and</c>

00:12:59.150 --> 00:12:59.160 align:start position:0%
quite amazing kcd Trio phase one and
 

00:12:59.160 --> 00:13:00.590 align:start position:0%
quite amazing kcd Trio phase one and
done<00:12:59.339><c> is</c><00:12:59.579><c> two</c><00:12:59.880><c> as</c><00:13:00.000><c> a</c><00:13:00.120><c> data</c><00:13:00.300><c> availability</c>

00:13:00.590 --> 00:13:00.600 align:start position:0%
done is two as a data availability
 

00:13:00.600 --> 00:13:02.449 align:start position:0%
done is two as a data availability
engine<00:13:00.959><c> nowadays</c><00:13:01.560><c> I</c><00:13:01.860><c> think</c><00:13:01.980><c> these</c><00:13:02.339><c> this</c>

00:13:02.449 --> 00:13:02.459 align:start position:0%
engine nowadays I think these this
 

00:13:02.459 --> 00:13:04.490 align:start position:0%
engine nowadays I think these this
technology<00:13:02.820><c> like</c><00:13:03.300><c> everyone</c><00:13:03.600><c> would</c><00:13:03.959><c> just</c><00:13:04.200><c> nod</c>

00:13:04.490 --> 00:13:04.500 align:start position:0%
technology like everyone would just nod
 

00:13:04.500 --> 00:13:05.870 align:start position:0%
technology like everyone would just nod
and<00:13:04.620><c> be</c><00:13:04.800><c> like</c><00:13:04.860><c> yeah</c><00:13:04.980><c> sure</c><00:13:05.220><c> thanks</c><00:13:05.459><c> shouting</c>

00:13:05.870 --> 00:13:05.880 align:start position:0%
and be like yeah sure thanks shouting
 

00:13:05.880 --> 00:13:07.490 align:start position:0%
and be like yeah sure thanks shouting
but<00:13:06.300><c> three</c><00:13:06.540><c> and</c><00:13:06.660><c> a</c><00:13:06.779><c> half</c><00:13:06.839><c> years</c><00:13:07.019><c> ago</c><00:13:07.200><c> I</c><00:13:07.380><c> think</c>

00:13:07.490 --> 00:13:07.500 align:start position:0%
but three and a half years ago I think
 

00:13:07.500 --> 00:13:10.069 align:start position:0%
but three and a half years ago I think
that<00:13:07.680><c> was</c><00:13:07.860><c> quite</c><00:13:08.279><c> visionary</c>

00:13:10.069 --> 00:13:10.079 align:start position:0%
that was quite visionary
 

00:13:10.079 --> 00:13:13.310 align:start position:0%
that was quite visionary
um<00:13:10.200><c> then</c><00:13:11.240><c> uh</c><00:13:12.240><c> a</c><00:13:12.480><c> year</c><00:13:12.660><c> later</c><00:13:12.839><c> a</c><00:13:13.019><c> year</c><00:13:13.139><c> and</c><00:13:13.260><c> a</c>

00:13:13.310 --> 00:13:13.320 align:start position:0%
um then uh a year later a year and a
 

00:13:13.320 --> 00:13:14.870 align:start position:0%
um then uh a year later a year and a
half<00:13:13.380><c> later</c><00:13:13.560><c> we</c><00:13:13.860><c> had</c><00:13:13.920><c> vitalik</c><00:13:14.459><c> for</c><00:13:14.639><c> the</c><00:13:14.760><c> first</c>

00:13:14.870 --> 00:13:14.880 align:start position:0%
half later we had vitalik for the first
 

00:13:14.880 --> 00:13:16.610 align:start position:0%
half later we had vitalik for the first
time<00:13:14.940><c> confusing</c><00:13:15.480><c> this</c><00:13:15.660><c> term</c><00:13:15.779><c> roll-up</c><00:13:16.200><c> Centric</c>

00:13:16.610 --> 00:13:16.620 align:start position:0%
time confusing this term roll-up Centric
 

00:13:16.620 --> 00:13:18.949 align:start position:0%
time confusing this term roll-up Centric
roadmap<00:13:17.339><c> where</c><00:13:17.760><c> basically</c><00:13:18.120><c> we</c><00:13:18.360><c> we</c><00:13:18.600><c> finally</c>

00:13:18.949 --> 00:13:18.959 align:start position:0%
roadmap where basically we we finally
 

00:13:18.959 --> 00:13:21.410 align:start position:0%
roadmap where basically we we finally
realized<00:13:19.440><c> that</c><00:13:19.740><c> yes</c><00:13:20.220><c> there</c><00:13:20.459><c> is</c><00:13:20.880><c> no</c><00:13:21.000><c> other</c><00:13:21.180><c> way</c>

00:13:21.410 --> 00:13:21.420 align:start position:0%
realized that yes there is no other way
 

00:13:21.420 --> 00:13:22.910 align:start position:0%
realized that yes there is no other way
to<00:13:21.540><c> scale</c><00:13:21.779><c> like</c><00:13:22.079><c> you</c><00:13:22.320><c> really</c><00:13:22.440><c> need</c><00:13:22.740><c> this</c>

00:13:22.910 --> 00:13:22.920 align:start position:0%
to scale like you really need this
 

00:13:22.920 --> 00:13:24.650 align:start position:0%
to scale like you really need this
decoupling<00:13:23.459><c> of</c><00:13:23.639><c> the</c><00:13:24.000><c> execution</c><00:13:24.360><c> of</c><00:13:24.540><c> the</c>

00:13:24.650 --> 00:13:24.660 align:start position:0%
decoupling of the execution of the
 

00:13:24.660 --> 00:13:26.150 align:start position:0%
decoupling of the execution of the
settlement<00:13:24.959><c> otherwise</c><00:13:25.380><c> like</c><00:13:25.860><c> you</c><00:13:26.040><c> you</c>

00:13:26.150 --> 00:13:26.160 align:start position:0%
settlement otherwise like you you
 

00:13:26.160 --> 00:13:29.150 align:start position:0%
settlement otherwise like you you
basically<00:13:27.000><c> as</c><00:13:27.839><c> I</c><00:13:28.139><c> was</c><00:13:28.260><c> saying</c><00:13:28.500><c> earlier</c><00:13:28.980><c> right</c>

00:13:29.150 --> 00:13:29.160 align:start position:0%
basically as I was saying earlier right
 

00:13:29.160 --> 00:13:31.310 align:start position:0%
basically as I was saying earlier right
you<00:13:29.279><c> can't</c><00:13:29.519><c> break</c><00:13:29.760><c> out</c><00:13:29.940><c> of</c><00:13:30.120><c> this</c><00:13:30.360><c> dilemma</c><00:13:31.139><c> so</c>

00:13:31.310 --> 00:13:31.320 align:start position:0%
you can't break out of this dilemma so
 

00:13:31.320 --> 00:13:33.290 align:start position:0%
you can't break out of this dilemma so
so<00:13:31.560><c> we</c><00:13:31.740><c> really</c><00:13:31.860><c> like</c><00:13:32.100><c> Roll-Ups</c><00:13:32.940><c> are</c><00:13:33.000><c> the</c><00:13:33.180><c> way</c>

00:13:33.290 --> 00:13:33.300 align:start position:0%
so we really like Roll-Ups are the way
 

00:13:33.300 --> 00:13:35.210 align:start position:0%
so we really like Roll-Ups are the way
to<00:13:33.480><c> go</c><00:13:33.600><c> here</c>

00:13:35.210 --> 00:13:35.220 align:start position:0%
to go here
 

00:13:35.220 --> 00:13:38.090 align:start position:0%
to go here
um and<00:13:35.639><c> then</c><00:13:35.760><c> just</c><00:13:36.000><c> uh</c><00:13:36.480><c> third</c><00:13:36.660><c> is</c><00:13:36.959><c> the</c><00:13:37.200><c> a</c><00:13:37.680><c> fun</c>

00:13:38.090 --> 00:13:38.100 align:start position:0%
um and then just uh third is the a fun
 

00:13:38.100 --> 00:13:39.470 align:start position:0%
um and then just uh third is the a fun
little<00:13:38.339><c> one</c>

00:13:39.470 --> 00:13:39.480 align:start position:0%
little one
 

00:13:39.480 --> 00:13:42.290 align:start position:0%
little one
um<00:13:39.600><c> that</c><00:13:39.959><c> uh</c><00:13:40.260><c> my</c><00:13:40.620><c> colleague</c><00:13:41.100><c> Matt</c>

00:13:42.290 --> 00:13:42.300 align:start position:0%
um that uh my colleague Matt
 

00:13:42.300 --> 00:13:45.290 align:start position:0%
um that uh my colleague Matt
um<00:13:42.800><c> uh</c><00:13:43.800><c> wrote</c><00:13:44.279><c> a</c><00:13:44.579><c> couple</c><00:13:44.940><c> weeks</c><00:13:45.240><c> after</c>

00:13:45.290 --> 00:13:45.300 align:start position:0%
um uh wrote a couple weeks after
 

00:13:45.300 --> 00:13:46.910 align:start position:0%
um uh wrote a couple weeks after
vitalik's<00:13:46.019><c> post</c>

00:13:46.910 --> 00:13:46.920 align:start position:0%
vitalik's post
 

00:13:46.920 --> 00:13:48.829 align:start position:0%
vitalik's post
um<00:13:46.980><c> looking</c><00:13:47.220><c> back</c><00:13:47.399><c> at</c><00:13:47.639><c> our</c><00:13:47.820><c> early</c><00:13:48.060><c> his</c><00:13:48.600><c> two</c>

00:13:48.829 --> 00:13:48.839 align:start position:0%
um looking back at our early his two
 

00:13:48.839 --> 00:13:52.190 align:start position:0%
um looking back at our early his two
plans<00:13:49.139><c> and</c><00:13:49.920><c> it</c><00:13:50.100><c> actually</c><00:13:50.399><c> turns</c><00:13:50.880><c> out</c><00:13:51.000><c> that</c><00:13:51.480><c> uh</c>

00:13:52.190 --> 00:13:52.200 align:start position:0%
plans and it actually turns out that uh
 

00:13:52.200 --> 00:13:53.750 align:start position:0%
plans and it actually turns out that uh
basically<00:13:52.560><c> this</c><00:13:52.740><c> if</c><00:13:52.980><c> you</c><00:13:53.279><c> remember</c><00:13:53.399><c> the</c><00:13:53.639><c> early</c>

00:13:53.750 --> 00:13:53.760 align:start position:0%
basically this if you remember the early
 

00:13:53.760 --> 00:13:55.610 align:start position:0%
basically this if you remember the early
chatting<00:13:54.540><c> plans</c>

00:13:55.610 --> 00:13:55.620 align:start position:0%
chatting plans
 

00:13:55.620 --> 00:13:57.650 align:start position:0%
chatting plans
um<00:13:55.680><c> if</c><00:13:55.860><c> I</c><00:13:55.980><c> just</c><00:13:56.160><c> go</c><00:13:56.279><c> back</c><00:13:56.459><c> a</c><00:13:56.639><c> couple</c><00:13:56.820><c> slides</c><00:13:57.480><c> if</c>

00:13:57.650 --> 00:13:57.660 align:start position:0%
um if I just go back a couple slides if
 

00:13:57.660 --> 00:14:01.310 align:start position:0%
um if I just go back a couple slides if
this<00:13:57.839><c> works</c><00:13:58.399><c> uh</c><00:13:59.399><c> actually</c><00:14:00.180><c> what</c><00:14:00.660><c> we</c><00:14:00.839><c> what</c><00:14:01.079><c> we</c>

00:14:01.310 --> 00:14:01.320 align:start position:0%
this works uh actually what we what we
 

00:14:01.320 --> 00:14:03.110 align:start position:0%
this works uh actually what we what we
were<00:14:01.500><c> planning</c><00:14:01.920><c> back</c><00:14:02.279><c> back</c><00:14:02.519><c> in</c><00:14:02.700><c> the</c><00:14:02.820><c> day</c><00:14:02.880><c> with</c>

00:14:03.110 --> 00:14:03.120 align:start position:0%
were planning back back in the day with
 

00:14:03.120 --> 00:14:05.090 align:start position:0%
were planning back back in the day with
all<00:14:03.300><c> these</c><00:14:03.480><c> different</c><00:14:03.600><c> charts</c><00:14:04.079><c> was</c><00:14:04.680><c> kind</c><00:14:04.980><c> of</c>

00:14:05.090 --> 00:14:05.100 align:start position:0%
all these different charts was kind of
 

00:14:05.100 --> 00:14:07.190 align:start position:0%
all these different charts was kind of
this<00:14:05.339><c> picture</c><00:14:05.519><c> all</c><00:14:05.880><c> along</c><00:14:06.060><c> right</c><00:14:06.420><c> it</c><00:14:06.839><c> was</c><00:14:06.959><c> just</c>

00:14:07.190 --> 00:14:07.200 align:start position:0%
this picture all along right it was just
 

00:14:07.200 --> 00:14:08.990 align:start position:0%
this picture all along right it was just
that<00:14:07.440><c> we</c><00:14:07.680><c> wanted</c><00:14:07.920><c> to</c><00:14:08.160><c> have</c><00:14:08.279><c> all</c><00:14:08.519><c> these</c><00:14:08.639><c> charts</c>

00:14:08.990 --> 00:14:09.000 align:start position:0%
that we wanted to have all these charts
 

00:14:09.000 --> 00:14:11.810 align:start position:0%
that we wanted to have all these charts
be<00:14:09.120><c> like</c><00:14:09.360><c> super</c><00:14:09.540><c> enshrined</c><00:14:10.260><c> and</c><00:14:11.100><c> and</c><00:14:11.279><c> at</c><00:14:11.700><c> some</c>

00:14:11.810 --> 00:14:11.820 align:start position:0%
be like super enshrined and and at some
 

00:14:11.820 --> 00:14:13.430 align:start position:0%
be like super enshrined and and at some
point<00:14:11.940><c> and</c><00:14:12.300><c> try</c><00:14:12.540><c> and</c><00:14:12.660><c> roll</c><00:14:12.779><c> ups</c><00:14:13.079><c> basically</c><00:14:13.320><c> and</c>

00:14:13.430 --> 00:14:13.440 align:start position:0%
point and try and roll ups basically and
 

00:14:13.440 --> 00:14:14.870 align:start position:0%
point and try and roll ups basically and
then<00:14:13.560><c> someone</c><00:14:13.680><c> we</c><00:14:13.980><c> realized</c><00:14:14.220><c> it's</c><00:14:14.459><c> just</c><00:14:14.639><c> much</c>

00:14:14.870 --> 00:14:14.880 align:start position:0%
then someone we realized it's just much
 

00:14:14.880 --> 00:14:17.150 align:start position:0%
then someone we realized it's just much
better<00:14:15.180><c> if</c><00:14:15.959><c> we</c><00:14:16.139><c> open</c><00:14:16.260><c> this</c><00:14:16.500><c> up</c><00:14:16.680><c> for</c><00:14:16.920><c> for</c>

00:14:17.150 --> 00:14:17.160 align:start position:0%
better if we open this up for for
 

00:14:17.160 --> 00:14:18.829 align:start position:0%
better if we open this up for for
General<00:14:17.399><c> Innovation</c><00:14:17.940><c> if</c><00:14:18.240><c> we</c><00:14:18.360><c> if</c><00:14:18.540><c> we</c><00:14:18.720><c> don't</c>

00:14:18.829 --> 00:14:18.839 align:start position:0%
General Innovation if we if we don't
 

00:14:18.839 --> 00:14:20.750 align:start position:0%
General Innovation if we if we don't
build<00:14:19.139><c> or</c><00:14:19.620><c> basically</c><00:14:20.100><c> if</c><00:14:20.220><c> we're</c><00:14:20.399><c> the</c><00:14:20.639><c> only</c>

00:14:20.750 --> 00:14:20.760 align:start position:0%
build or basically if we're the only
 

00:14:20.760 --> 00:14:22.970 align:start position:0%
build or basically if we're the only
parties<00:14:21.180><c> building</c><00:14:21.420><c> Roll-Ups</c>

00:14:22.970 --> 00:14:22.980 align:start position:0%
parties building Roll-Ups
 

00:14:22.980 --> 00:14:24.889 align:start position:0%
parties building Roll-Ups
um<00:14:23.100><c> and</c><00:14:23.639><c> so</c><00:14:23.760><c> yeah</c><00:14:23.880><c> this</c><00:14:24.240><c> this</c><00:14:24.420><c> basically</c><00:14:24.720><c> just</c>

00:14:24.889 --> 00:14:24.899 align:start position:0%
um and so yeah this this basically just
 

00:14:24.899 --> 00:14:27.110 align:start position:0%
um and so yeah this this basically just
you<00:14:25.079><c> know</c><00:14:25.200><c> it's</c><00:14:25.320><c> a</c><00:14:25.500><c> little</c><00:14:25.560><c> history</c><00:14:26.220><c> kind</c><00:14:26.940><c> of</c>

00:14:27.110 --> 00:14:27.120 align:start position:0%
you know it's a little history kind of
 

00:14:27.120 --> 00:14:28.910 align:start position:0%
you know it's a little history kind of
tidbit<00:14:27.660><c> so</c><00:14:27.899><c> so</c><00:14:28.079><c> this</c><00:14:28.260><c> is</c><00:14:28.380><c> kind</c><00:14:28.440><c> of</c><00:14:28.500><c> how</c><00:14:28.620><c> we</c><00:14:28.740><c> how</c>

00:14:28.910 --> 00:14:28.920 align:start position:0%
tidbit so so this is kind of how we how
 

00:14:28.920 --> 00:14:31.129 align:start position:0%
tidbit so so this is kind of how we how
we<00:14:29.100><c> got</c><00:14:29.220><c> to</c><00:14:29.399><c> where</c><00:14:29.940><c> we</c><00:14:30.120><c> wanted</c><00:14:30.240><c> to</c><00:14:30.420><c> move</c><00:14:30.720><c> move</c>

00:14:31.129 --> 00:14:31.139 align:start position:0%
we got to where we wanted to move move
 

00:14:31.139 --> 00:14:33.949 align:start position:0%
we got to where we wanted to move move
move<00:14:31.260><c> forward</c><00:14:32.220><c> with</c><00:14:32.700><c> ethereum</c><00:14:33.120><c> so</c><00:14:33.480><c> that</c><00:14:33.839><c> kind</c>

00:14:33.949 --> 00:14:33.959 align:start position:0%
move forward with ethereum so that kind
 

00:14:33.959 --> 00:14:35.629 align:start position:0%
move forward with ethereum so that kind
of<00:14:34.019><c> brings</c><00:14:34.200><c> us</c><00:14:34.680><c> to</c><00:14:34.920><c> to</c><00:14:35.100><c> the</c><00:14:35.279><c> kind</c><00:14:35.399><c> of</c><00:14:35.459><c> the</c>

00:14:35.629 --> 00:14:35.639 align:start position:0%
of brings us to to the kind of the
 

00:14:35.639 --> 00:14:38.329 align:start position:0%
of brings us to to the kind of the
pre-merge<00:14:36.180><c> state</c><00:14:36.360><c> where</c><00:14:36.839><c> we</c><00:14:37.380><c> already</c><00:14:37.560><c> started</c>

00:14:38.329 --> 00:14:38.339 align:start position:0%
pre-merge state where we already started
 

00:14:38.339 --> 00:14:41.269 align:start position:0%
pre-merge state where we already started
to<00:14:38.519><c> use</c><00:14:38.700><c> the</c><00:14:39.000><c> ethereum</c><00:14:39.360><c> chain</c><00:14:39.600><c> as</c><00:14:40.079><c> a</c><00:14:40.380><c> as</c><00:14:40.920><c> a</c>

00:14:41.269 --> 00:14:41.279 align:start position:0%
to use the ethereum chain as a as a
 

00:14:41.279 --> 00:14:42.769 align:start position:0%
to use the ethereum chain as a as a
settlement<00:14:41.760><c> chain</c><00:14:41.940><c> as</c><00:14:42.180><c> well</c><00:14:42.300><c> but</c><00:14:42.480><c> of</c><00:14:42.660><c> course</c>

00:14:42.769 --> 00:14:42.779 align:start position:0%
settlement chain as well but of course
 

00:14:42.779 --> 00:14:44.210 align:start position:0%
settlement chain as well but of course
it<00:14:42.899><c> still</c><00:14:43.079><c> has</c><00:14:43.199><c> execution</c><00:14:43.560><c> so</c><00:14:43.800><c> it's</c><00:14:43.920><c> like</c><00:14:44.040><c> kind</c>

00:14:44.210 --> 00:14:44.220 align:start position:0%
it still has execution so it's like kind
 

00:14:44.220 --> 00:14:46.129 align:start position:0%
it still has execution so it's like kind
of<00:14:44.279><c> like</c><00:14:44.399><c> a</c><00:14:44.519><c> hybrid</c><00:14:44.820><c> chain</c><00:14:45.060><c> it's</c><00:14:45.660><c> still</c><00:14:45.899><c> proof</c>

00:14:46.129 --> 00:14:46.139 align:start position:0%
of like a hybrid chain it's still proof
 

00:14:46.139 --> 00:14:47.389 align:start position:0%
of like a hybrid chain it's still proof
of work<00:14:46.320><c> security</c><00:14:46.560><c> of</c><00:14:46.860><c> course</c><00:14:46.980><c> before</c><00:14:47.160><c> the</c>

00:14:47.389 --> 00:14:47.399 align:start position:0%
of work security of course before the
 

00:14:47.399 --> 00:14:50.329 align:start position:0%
of work security of course before the
merge<00:14:47.760><c> uh</c><00:14:48.720><c> and</c><00:14:49.199><c> as</c><00:14:49.740><c> I</c><00:14:49.920><c> was</c><00:14:50.040><c> saying</c><00:14:50.220><c> right</c>

00:14:50.329 --> 00:14:50.339 align:start position:0%
merge uh and as I was saying right
 

00:14:50.339 --> 00:14:52.009 align:start position:0%
merge uh and as I was saying right
settlement<00:14:50.699><c> chains</c><00:14:51.060><c> need</c><00:14:51.180><c> the</c><00:14:51.360><c> settlement</c>

00:14:52.009 --> 00:14:52.019 align:start position:0%
settlement chains need the settlement
 

00:14:52.019 --> 00:14:54.050 align:start position:0%
settlement chains need the settlement
aspect<00:14:52.440><c> which</c><00:14:52.740><c> you</c><00:14:53.279><c> kind</c><00:14:53.459><c> of</c><00:14:53.519><c> get</c><00:14:53.639><c> for</c><00:14:53.880><c> free</c>

00:14:54.050 --> 00:14:54.060 align:start position:0%
aspect which you kind of get for free
 

00:14:54.060 --> 00:14:55.370 align:start position:0%
aspect which you kind of get for free
when<00:14:54.300><c> you</c><00:14:54.420><c> have</c><00:14:54.540><c> a</c><00:14:54.600><c> general</c><00:14:54.720><c> purpose</c><00:14:55.139><c> chain</c>

00:14:55.370 --> 00:14:55.380 align:start position:0%
when you have a general purpose chain
 

00:14:55.380 --> 00:14:57.110 align:start position:0%
when you have a general purpose chain
but<00:14:55.980><c> then</c><00:14:56.100><c> you</c><00:14:56.220><c> also</c><00:14:56.459><c> need</c><00:14:56.519><c> data</c><00:14:56.820><c> availability</c>

00:14:57.110 --> 00:14:57.120 align:start position:0%
but then you also need data availability
 

00:14:57.120 --> 00:14:59.269 align:start position:0%
but then you also need data availability
and<00:14:57.600><c> data</c><00:14:58.199><c> availability</c><00:14:58.500><c> on</c><00:14:58.860><c> the</c><00:14:58.980><c> existing</c>

00:14:59.269 --> 00:14:59.279 align:start position:0%
and data availability on the existing
 

00:14:59.279 --> 00:15:01.610 align:start position:0%
and data availability on the existing
ethereum<00:14:59.699><c> chain</c><00:14:59.940><c> is</c><00:15:00.420><c> really</c><00:15:00.779><c> quite</c><00:15:01.199><c> expensive</c>

00:15:01.610 --> 00:15:01.620 align:start position:0%
ethereum chain is really quite expensive
 

00:15:01.620 --> 00:15:03.590 align:start position:0%
ethereum chain is really quite expensive
it<00:15:01.860><c> was</c><00:15:02.160><c> never</c><00:15:02.339><c> meant</c><00:15:02.699><c> to</c><00:15:02.880><c> provide</c><00:15:03.240><c> data</c>

00:15:03.590 --> 00:15:03.600 align:start position:0%
it was never meant to provide data
 

00:15:03.600 --> 00:15:05.329 align:start position:0%
it was never meant to provide data
availability<00:15:03.899><c> so</c><00:15:04.260><c> what</c><00:15:04.500><c> it's</c><00:15:04.920><c> kind</c><00:15:05.220><c> of</c>

00:15:05.329 --> 00:15:05.339 align:start position:0%
availability so what it's kind of
 

00:15:05.339 --> 00:15:06.650 align:start position:0%
availability so what it's kind of
basically<00:15:05.579><c> right</c><00:15:05.760><c> now</c><00:15:05.940><c> kind</c><00:15:06.180><c> of</c><00:15:06.300><c> hacked</c><00:15:06.540><c> in</c>

00:15:06.650 --> 00:15:06.660 align:start position:0%
basically right now kind of hacked in
 

00:15:06.660 --> 00:15:09.230 align:start position:0%
basically right now kind of hacked in
you<00:15:06.899><c> just</c><00:15:07.139><c> basically</c><00:15:07.740><c> just</c><00:15:08.279><c> dump</c><00:15:08.519><c> data</c><00:15:09.000><c> into</c>

00:15:09.230 --> 00:15:09.240 align:start position:0%
you just basically just dump data into
 

00:15:09.240 --> 00:15:10.910 align:start position:0%
you just basically just dump data into
into<00:15:09.480><c> ethereum</c><00:15:09.959><c> transactions</c><00:15:10.560><c> and</c><00:15:10.740><c> then</c>

00:15:10.910 --> 00:15:10.920 align:start position:0%
into ethereum transactions and then
 

00:15:10.920 --> 00:15:12.710 align:start position:0%
into ethereum transactions and then
never<00:15:11.100><c> actually</c><00:15:11.399><c> use</c><00:15:11.579><c> them</c>

00:15:12.710 --> 00:15:12.720 align:start position:0%
never actually use them
 

00:15:12.720 --> 00:15:15.290 align:start position:0%
never actually use them
um<00:15:12.779><c> which</c><00:15:13.079><c> works</c><00:15:13.680><c> but</c><00:15:13.980><c> but</c><00:15:14.160><c> it's</c><00:15:14.639><c> just</c><00:15:15.000><c> very</c>

00:15:15.290 --> 00:15:15.300 align:start position:0%
um which works but but it's just very
 

00:15:15.300 --> 00:15:17.569 align:start position:0%
um which works but but it's just very
very<00:15:16.079><c> um</c><00:15:16.139><c> expensive</c><00:15:16.680><c> as</c><00:15:16.920><c> a</c><00:15:17.040><c> source</c><00:15:17.220><c> of</c><00:15:17.279><c> data</c>

00:15:17.569 --> 00:15:17.579 align:start position:0%
very um expensive as a source of data
 

00:15:17.579 --> 00:15:19.550 align:start position:0%
very um expensive as a source of data
availability<00:15:17.940><c> uh</c><00:15:18.899><c> of</c><00:15:19.079><c> course</c><00:15:19.139><c> we</c><00:15:19.260><c> started</c>

00:15:19.550 --> 00:15:19.560 align:start position:0%
availability uh of course we started
 

00:15:19.560 --> 00:15:21.170 align:start position:0%
availability uh of course we started
having<00:15:19.680><c> rollups</c><00:15:20.279><c> on</c><00:15:20.339><c> top</c>

00:15:21.170 --> 00:15:21.180 align:start position:0%
having rollups on top
 

00:15:21.180 --> 00:15:23.509 align:start position:0%
having rollups on top
um<00:15:21.300><c> really</c><00:15:22.199><c> exciting</c><00:15:22.560><c> if</c><00:15:22.740><c> you</c><00:15:22.860><c> ask</c><00:15:22.980><c> me</c><00:15:23.160><c> I</c><00:15:23.399><c> think</c>

00:15:23.509 --> 00:15:23.519 align:start position:0%
um really exciting if you ask me I think
 

00:15:23.519 --> 00:15:24.829 align:start position:0%
um really exciting if you ask me I think
Roll-Ups<00:15:24.000><c> have</c><00:15:24.120><c> been</c><00:15:24.360><c> making</c><00:15:24.480><c> a</c><00:15:24.660><c> lot</c><00:15:24.720><c> of</c>

00:15:24.829 --> 00:15:24.839 align:start position:0%
Roll-Ups have been making a lot of
 

00:15:24.839 --> 00:15:27.230 align:start position:0%
Roll-Ups have been making a lot of
progress<00:15:25.079><c> over</c><00:15:25.260><c> the</c><00:15:25.440><c> last</c><00:15:25.560><c> two</c><00:15:25.980><c> years</c>

00:15:27.230 --> 00:15:27.240 align:start position:0%
progress over the last two years
 

00:15:27.240 --> 00:15:28.790 align:start position:0%
progress over the last two years
um<00:15:27.300><c> and</c><00:15:27.600><c> then</c><00:15:27.720><c> you</c><00:15:28.019><c> know</c><00:15:28.139><c> pre-merge</c><00:15:28.560><c> we</c><00:15:28.680><c> had</c>

00:15:28.790 --> 00:15:28.800 align:start position:0%
um and then you know pre-merge we had
 

00:15:28.800 --> 00:15:31.069 align:start position:0%
um and then you know pre-merge we had
this<00:15:28.920><c> this</c><00:15:29.100><c> Beacon</c><00:15:29.459><c> chain</c><00:15:29.660><c> just</c><00:15:30.660><c> an</c><00:15:30.779><c> empty</c>

00:15:31.069 --> 00:15:31.079 align:start position:0%
this this Beacon chain just an empty
 

00:15:31.079 --> 00:15:33.470 align:start position:0%
this this Beacon chain just an empty
little<00:15:31.199><c> box</c><00:15:31.440><c> nothing</c><00:15:31.800><c> in</c><00:15:32.040><c> it</c><00:15:32.220><c> and</c><00:15:32.880><c> but</c><00:15:33.240><c> much</c>

00:15:33.470 --> 00:15:33.480 align:start position:0%
little box nothing in it and but much
 

00:15:33.480 --> 00:15:35.210 align:start position:0%
little box nothing in it and but much
stronger<00:15:33.779><c> proof</c><00:15:34.019><c> of</c><00:15:34.199><c> proof</c><00:15:34.800><c> stake</c><00:15:35.040><c> security</c>

00:15:35.210 --> 00:15:35.220 align:start position:0%
stronger proof of proof stake security
 

00:15:35.220 --> 00:15:37.370 align:start position:0%
stronger proof of proof stake security
right<00:15:35.579><c> and</c><00:15:35.760><c> then</c><00:15:35.940><c> of</c><00:15:36.180><c> course</c>

00:15:37.370 --> 00:15:37.380 align:start position:0%
right and then of course
 

00:15:37.380 --> 00:15:41.269 align:start position:0%
right and then of course
as<00:15:37.980><c> of</c><00:15:38.160><c> today</c><00:15:38.820><c> we</c><00:15:39.540><c> ended</c><00:15:39.779><c> up</c><00:15:39.899><c> you</c><00:15:40.560><c> know</c><00:15:40.620><c> merging</c>

00:15:41.269 --> 00:15:41.279 align:start position:0%
as of today we ended up you know merging
 

00:15:41.279 --> 00:15:44.210 align:start position:0%
as of today we ended up you know merging
and<00:15:42.120><c> now</c><00:15:42.480><c> we</c><00:15:42.720><c> have</c><00:15:42.899><c> have</c><00:15:43.199><c> this</c><00:15:43.560><c> uh</c><00:15:43.920><c> basically</c>

00:15:44.210 --> 00:15:44.220 align:start position:0%
and now we have have this uh basically
 

00:15:44.220 --> 00:15:46.129 align:start position:0%
and now we have have this uh basically
same<00:15:44.579><c> same</c><00:15:44.639><c> situations</c><00:15:45.120><c> before</c><00:15:45.420><c> but</c><00:15:45.660><c> but</c><00:15:45.839><c> much</c>

00:15:46.129 --> 00:15:46.139 align:start position:0%
same same situations before but but much
 

00:15:46.139 --> 00:15:48.350 align:start position:0%
same same situations before but but much
higher<00:15:46.740><c> security</c>

00:15:48.350 --> 00:15:48.360 align:start position:0%
higher security
 

00:15:48.360 --> 00:15:50.569 align:start position:0%
higher security
um and<00:15:48.720><c> just</c><00:15:48.839><c> as</c><00:15:48.959><c> a</c><00:15:49.199><c> maybe</c><00:15:49.320><c> quicker</c><00:15:49.860><c> side</c><00:15:50.040><c> I</c><00:15:50.399><c> I</c>

00:15:50.569 --> 00:15:50.579 align:start position:0%
um and just as a maybe quicker side I I
 

00:15:50.579 --> 00:15:52.670 align:start position:0%
um and just as a maybe quicker side I I
think<00:15:50.820><c> I</c><00:15:50.940><c> have</c><00:15:51.060><c> the</c><00:15:51.180><c> time</c><00:15:51.360><c> for</c><00:15:51.480><c> that</c><00:15:51.660><c> uh</c><00:15:52.320><c> why</c>

00:15:52.670 --> 00:15:52.680 align:start position:0%
think I have the time for that uh why
 

00:15:52.680 --> 00:15:54.650 align:start position:0%
think I have the time for that uh why
does<00:15:52.920><c> proof</c><00:15:53.220><c> of</c><00:15:53.279><c> stake</c><00:15:53.579><c> actually</c><00:15:53.820><c> give</c><00:15:54.240><c> higher</c>

00:15:54.650 --> 00:15:54.660 align:start position:0%
does proof of stake actually give higher
 

00:15:54.660 --> 00:15:56.509 align:start position:0%
does proof of stake actually give higher
security<00:15:54.779><c> I</c><00:15:55.139><c> always</c><00:15:55.320><c> I</c><00:15:55.740><c> mean</c><00:15:55.800><c> it's</c><00:15:56.040><c> not</c><00:15:56.279><c> really</c>

00:15:56.509 --> 00:15:56.519 align:start position:0%
security I always I mean it's not really
 

00:15:56.519 --> 00:15:58.910 align:start position:0%
security I always I mean it's not really
kind<00:15:56.820><c> of</c><00:15:56.940><c> part</c><00:15:57.240><c> of</c><00:15:57.360><c> my</c><00:15:57.540><c> talk</c><00:15:57.720><c> but</c><00:15:58.139><c> just</c><00:15:58.800><c> because</c>

00:15:58.910 --> 00:15:58.920 align:start position:0%
kind of part of my talk but just because
 

00:15:58.920 --> 00:16:00.170 align:start position:0%
kind of part of my talk but just because
I<00:15:59.100><c> always</c><00:15:59.220><c> see</c><00:15:59.459><c> a</c><00:15:59.579><c> little</c><00:15:59.699><c> bit</c><00:15:59.820><c> of</c><00:15:59.880><c> confusion</c>

00:16:00.170 --> 00:16:00.180 align:start position:0%
I always see a little bit of confusion
 

00:16:00.180 --> 00:16:02.090 align:start position:0%
I always see a little bit of confusion
about<00:16:00.300><c> that</c><00:16:00.480><c> debate</c><00:16:00.779><c> on</c><00:16:00.899><c> Twitter</c><00:16:01.079><c> and</c><00:16:01.740><c> I</c><00:16:02.040><c> think</c>

00:16:02.090 --> 00:16:02.100 align:start position:0%
about that debate on Twitter and I think
 

00:16:02.100 --> 00:16:03.769 align:start position:0%
about that debate on Twitter and I think
it's<00:16:02.220><c> it's</c><00:16:02.459><c> really</c><00:16:02.699><c> quite</c><00:16:03.060><c> quite</c><00:16:03.660><c> simple</c>

00:16:03.769 --> 00:16:03.779 align:start position:0%
it's it's really quite quite simple
 

00:16:03.779 --> 00:16:05.329 align:start position:0%
it's it's really quite quite simple
actually<00:16:04.079><c> like</c>

00:16:05.329 --> 00:16:05.339 align:start position:0%
actually like
 

00:16:05.339 --> 00:16:07.730 align:start position:0%
actually like
um<00:16:05.459><c> the</c><00:16:06.060><c> the</c><00:16:06.360><c> way</c><00:16:06.779><c> I</c><00:16:06.899><c> would</c><00:16:07.199><c> think</c><00:16:07.380><c> about</c><00:16:07.500><c> like</c>

00:16:07.730 --> 00:16:07.740 align:start position:0%
um the the way I would think about like
 

00:16:07.740 --> 00:16:09.410 align:start position:0%
um the the way I would think about like
moving<00:16:08.040><c> from</c><00:16:08.100><c> working</c><00:16:08.519><c> to</c><00:16:08.820><c> proof</c><00:16:09.060><c> of</c><00:16:09.120><c> stake</c><00:16:09.300><c> in</c>

00:16:09.410 --> 00:16:09.420 align:start position:0%
moving from working to proof of stake in
 

00:16:09.420 --> 00:16:11.990 align:start position:0%
moving from working to proof of stake in
terms<00:16:09.600><c> of</c><00:16:09.660><c> security</c><00:16:09.839><c> one</c><00:16:10.740><c> it's</c><00:16:11.100><c> just</c><00:16:11.339><c> more</c>

00:16:11.990 --> 00:16:12.000 align:start position:0%
terms of security one it's just more
 

00:16:12.000 --> 00:16:14.689 align:start position:0%
terms of security one it's just more
efficient<00:16:12.360><c> right</c><00:16:12.660><c> and</c><00:16:13.440><c> that</c><00:16:13.800><c> is</c><00:16:13.920><c> because</c><00:16:14.100><c> you</c>

00:16:14.689 --> 00:16:14.699 align:start position:0%
efficient right and that is because you
 

00:16:14.699 --> 00:16:17.150 align:start position:0%
efficient right and that is because you
don't<00:16:14.820><c> you</c><00:16:15.180><c> basically</c><00:16:15.959><c> with</c><00:16:16.620><c> mining</c><00:16:16.980><c> you</c>

00:16:17.150 --> 00:16:17.160 align:start position:0%
don't you basically with mining you
 

00:16:17.160 --> 00:16:19.189 align:start position:0%
don't you basically with mining you
actually<00:16:17.339><c> have</c><00:16:17.519><c> to</c><00:16:17.699><c> pay</c><00:16:17.940><c> for</c><00:16:18.360><c> the</c><00:16:18.720><c> entire</c><00:16:18.959><c> cost</c>

00:16:19.189 --> 00:16:19.199 align:start position:0%
actually have to pay for the entire cost
 

00:16:19.199 --> 00:16:20.750 align:start position:0%
actually have to pay for the entire cost
of<00:16:19.380><c> the</c><00:16:19.500><c> operation</c><00:16:19.740><c> you</c><00:16:19.980><c> have</c><00:16:20.100><c> to</c><00:16:20.220><c> reimburse</c>

00:16:20.750 --> 00:16:20.760 align:start position:0%
of the operation you have to reimburse
 

00:16:20.760 --> 00:16:22.790 align:start position:0%
of the operation you have to reimburse
minus<00:16:21.120><c> for</c><00:16:21.420><c> both</c><00:16:21.839><c> the</c><00:16:22.019><c> mining</c><00:16:22.320><c> hardware</c><00:16:22.500><c> and</c>

00:16:22.790 --> 00:16:22.800 align:start position:0%
minus for both the mining hardware and
 

00:16:22.800 --> 00:16:24.110 align:start position:0%
minus for both the mining hardware and
the<00:16:22.980><c> energy</c><00:16:23.100><c> right</c><00:16:23.399><c> like</c><00:16:23.579><c> they</c><00:16:23.760><c> have</c><00:16:23.880><c> to</c><00:16:24.000><c> make</c>

00:16:24.110 --> 00:16:24.120 align:start position:0%
the energy right like they have to make
 

00:16:24.120 --> 00:16:26.329 align:start position:0%
the energy right like they have to make
all<00:16:24.300><c> of</c><00:16:24.420><c> that</c><00:16:24.540><c> up</c><00:16:24.720><c> with</c><00:16:25.139><c> the</c><00:16:25.320><c> income</c><00:16:25.620><c> whereas</c>

00:16:26.329 --> 00:16:26.339 align:start position:0%
all of that up with the income whereas
 

00:16:26.339 --> 00:16:27.829 align:start position:0%
all of that up with the income whereas
in<00:16:26.579><c> proof</c><00:16:26.820><c> of</c><00:16:26.880><c> stake</c><00:16:27.180><c> you</c><00:16:27.360><c> only</c><00:16:27.420><c> have</c><00:16:27.660><c> to</c><00:16:27.720><c> make</c>

00:16:27.829 --> 00:16:27.839 align:start position:0%
in proof of stake you only have to make
 

00:16:27.839 --> 00:16:29.990 align:start position:0%
in proof of stake you only have to make
up<00:16:28.019><c> the</c><00:16:28.199><c> lost</c><00:16:28.380><c> interest</c><00:16:28.680><c> on</c><00:16:29.040><c> your</c><00:16:29.160><c> money</c><00:16:29.339><c> so</c>

00:16:29.990 --> 00:16:30.000 align:start position:0%
up the lost interest on your money so
 

00:16:30.000 --> 00:16:31.370 align:start position:0%
up the lost interest on your money so
basically<00:16:30.360><c> you</c><00:16:30.540><c> can</c><00:16:30.660><c> get</c><00:16:30.779><c> away</c><00:16:30.899><c> with</c><00:16:31.199><c> with</c>

00:16:31.370 --> 00:16:31.380 align:start position:0%
basically you can get away with with
 

00:16:31.380 --> 00:16:33.949 align:start position:0%
basically you can get away with with
paying<00:16:31.800><c> way</c><00:16:31.980><c> if</c><00:16:32.339><c> your</c><00:16:32.519><c> rewards</c><00:16:33.060><c> for</c><00:16:33.540><c> this</c><00:16:33.720><c> for</c>

00:16:33.949 --> 00:16:33.959 align:start position:0%
paying way if your rewards for this for
 

00:16:33.959 --> 00:16:36.650 align:start position:0%
paying way if your rewards for this for
the<00:16:34.019><c> same</c><00:16:34.199><c> security</c><00:16:34.380><c> uh</c><00:16:35.279><c> in</c><00:16:35.519><c> in</c><00:16:35.699><c> improve</c><00:16:36.360><c> stake</c>

00:16:36.650 --> 00:16:36.660 align:start position:0%
the same security uh in in improve stake
 

00:16:36.660 --> 00:16:39.230 align:start position:0%
the same security uh in in improve stake
and<00:16:37.320><c> and</c><00:16:37.800><c> then</c><00:16:37.860><c> the</c><00:16:38.100><c> other</c><00:16:38.160><c> one</c><00:16:38.399><c> it</c><00:16:38.759><c> is</c><00:16:38.820><c> also</c>

00:16:39.230 --> 00:16:39.240 align:start position:0%
and and then the other one it is also
 

00:16:39.240 --> 00:16:40.790 align:start position:0%
and and then the other one it is also
that<00:16:39.480><c> proof</c><00:16:39.899><c> stake</c><00:16:40.199><c> security</c><00:16:40.320><c> is</c><00:16:40.620><c> just</c>

00:16:40.790 --> 00:16:40.800 align:start position:0%
that proof stake security is just
 

00:16:40.800 --> 00:16:43.189 align:start position:0%
that proof stake security is just
fundamentally<00:16:41.339><c> more</c><00:16:41.759><c> effective</c><00:16:42.180><c> so</c><00:16:42.779><c> that</c>

00:16:43.189 --> 00:16:43.199 align:start position:0%
fundamentally more effective so that
 

00:16:43.199 --> 00:16:45.350 align:start position:0%
fundamentally more effective so that
means<00:16:43.440><c> that</c><00:16:43.620><c> if</c><00:16:43.920><c> ever</c><00:16:44.220><c> there</c><00:16:44.699><c> were</c><00:16:44.880><c> to</c><00:16:45.060><c> be</c><00:16:45.180><c> a</c>

00:16:45.350 --> 00:16:45.360 align:start position:0%
means that if ever there were to be a
 

00:16:45.360 --> 00:16:47.210 align:start position:0%
means that if ever there were to be a
failure<00:16:45.720><c> which</c><00:16:46.440><c> of</c><00:16:46.620><c> course</c><00:16:46.740><c> hopefully</c><00:16:47.100><c> they</c>

00:16:47.210 --> 00:16:47.220 align:start position:0%
failure which of course hopefully they
 

00:16:47.220 --> 00:16:48.710 align:start position:0%
failure which of course hopefully they
will<00:16:47.399><c> never</c><00:16:47.519><c> be</c><00:16:47.639><c> but</c><00:16:47.880><c> if</c><00:16:48.060><c> they</c><00:16:48.180><c> ever</c><00:16:48.360><c> were</c><00:16:48.540><c> to</c>

00:16:48.710 --> 00:16:48.720 align:start position:0%
will never be but if they ever were to
 

00:16:48.720 --> 00:16:50.509 align:start position:0%
will never be but if they ever were to
be<00:16:48.839><c> like</c><00:16:48.959><c> an</c><00:16:49.079><c> attack</c><00:16:49.199><c> or</c><00:16:49.500><c> something</c>

00:16:50.509 --> 00:16:50.519 align:start position:0%
be like an attack or something
 

00:16:50.519 --> 00:16:52.490 align:start position:0%
be like an attack or something
um<00:16:50.639><c> the</c><00:16:50.880><c> attack</c><00:16:51.060><c> is</c><00:16:51.360><c> attributable</c><00:16:52.079><c> and</c><00:16:52.259><c> so</c><00:16:52.380><c> you</c>

00:16:52.490 --> 00:16:52.500 align:start position:0%
um the attack is attributable and so you
 

00:16:52.500 --> 00:16:54.290 align:start position:0%
um the attack is attributable and so you
can<00:16:52.560><c> you</c><00:16:52.740><c> can</c><00:16:52.920><c> just</c><00:16:53.100><c> you</c><00:16:53.339><c> can</c><00:16:53.579><c> go</c><00:16:53.940><c> in</c><00:16:54.120><c> and</c>

00:16:54.290 --> 00:16:54.300 align:start position:0%
can you can just you can go in and
 

00:16:54.300 --> 00:16:56.449 align:start position:0%
can you can just you can go in and
selectively<00:16:54.959><c> punish</c><00:16:55.380><c> people</c><00:16:55.620><c> improve</c><00:16:56.220><c> work</c>

00:16:56.449 --> 00:16:56.459 align:start position:0%
selectively punish people improve work
 

00:16:56.459 --> 00:16:58.970 align:start position:0%
selectively punish people improve work
once<00:16:57.240><c> someone</c><00:16:57.360><c> like</c><00:16:57.720><c> an</c><00:16:57.899><c> attacker</c><00:16:58.259><c> has</c><00:16:58.320><c> 51</c><00:16:58.620><c> of</c>

00:16:58.970 --> 00:16:58.980 align:start position:0%
once someone like an attacker has 51 of
 

00:16:58.980 --> 00:17:01.069 align:start position:0%
once someone like an attacker has 51 of
the<00:16:59.100><c> resources</c><00:16:59.519><c> you</c><00:17:00.360><c> basically</c><00:17:00.660><c> just</c><00:17:00.839><c> you</c>

00:17:01.069 --> 00:17:01.079 align:start position:0%
the resources you basically just you
 

00:17:01.079 --> 00:17:02.810 align:start position:0%
the resources you basically just you
know<00:17:01.199><c> your</c><00:17:01.320><c> change</c><00:17:01.560><c> is</c><00:17:01.680><c> just</c><00:17:01.860><c> lost</c><00:17:02.040><c> nothing</c>

00:17:02.810 --> 00:17:02.820 align:start position:0%
know your change is just lost nothing
 

00:17:02.820 --> 00:17:05.150 align:start position:0%
know your change is just lost nothing
nothing<00:17:03.060><c> to</c><00:17:03.360><c> be</c><00:17:03.480><c> done</c><00:17:03.660><c> improve</c><00:17:04.620><c> stake</c><00:17:04.980><c> it's</c>

00:17:05.150 --> 00:17:05.160 align:start position:0%
nothing to be done improve stake it's
 

00:17:05.160 --> 00:17:06.409 align:start position:0%
nothing to be done improve stake it's
really<00:17:05.339><c> not</c><00:17:05.459><c> a</c><00:17:05.579><c> big</c><00:17:05.699><c> deal</c><00:17:05.819><c> actually</c><00:17:06.059><c> right</c>

00:17:06.409 --> 00:17:06.419 align:start position:0%
really not a big deal actually right
 

00:17:06.419 --> 00:17:08.030 align:start position:0%
really not a big deal actually right
it's<00:17:06.900><c> a</c><00:17:07.020><c> little</c><00:17:07.079><c> bit</c><00:17:07.199><c> annoying</c><00:17:07.559><c> for</c><00:17:07.679><c> maybe</c><00:17:07.860><c> a</c>

00:17:08.030 --> 00:17:08.040 align:start position:0%
it's a little bit annoying for maybe a
 

00:17:08.040 --> 00:17:09.230 align:start position:0%
it's a little bit annoying for maybe a
day<00:17:08.160><c> and</c><00:17:08.339><c> then</c><00:17:08.459><c> afterwards</c><00:17:08.819><c> you're</c><00:17:08.939><c> just</c><00:17:09.059><c> done</c>

00:17:09.230 --> 00:17:09.240 align:start position:0%
day and then afterwards you're just done
 

00:17:09.240 --> 00:17:11.630 align:start position:0%
day and then afterwards you're just done
with<00:17:09.360><c> it</c><00:17:09.540><c> and</c><00:17:10.199><c> so</c><00:17:10.439><c> so</c><00:17:10.559><c> that's</c><00:17:10.919><c> really</c><00:17:11.220><c> really</c>

00:17:11.630 --> 00:17:11.640 align:start position:0%
with it and so so that's really really
 

00:17:11.640 --> 00:17:13.669 align:start position:0%
with it and so so that's really really
uh<00:17:12.059><c> neat</c><00:17:12.419><c> I</c><00:17:12.540><c> think</c><00:17:12.660><c> and</c><00:17:12.959><c> then</c><00:17:13.020><c> also</c><00:17:13.319><c> like</c><00:17:13.500><c> I</c>

00:17:13.669 --> 00:17:13.679 align:start position:0%
uh neat I think and then also like I
 

00:17:13.679 --> 00:17:15.590 align:start position:0%
uh neat I think and then also like I
couldn't<00:17:13.799><c> couldn't</c><00:17:14.040><c> quite</c><00:17:14.220><c> help</c><00:17:14.400><c> myself</c>

00:17:15.590 --> 00:17:15.600 align:start position:0%
couldn't couldn't quite help myself
 

00:17:15.600 --> 00:17:18.130 align:start position:0%
couldn't couldn't quite help myself
um<00:17:15.720><c> maybe</c><00:17:16.380><c> this</c><00:17:16.860><c> one</c>

00:17:18.130 --> 00:17:18.140 align:start position:0%
um maybe this one
 

00:17:18.140 --> 00:17:20.630 align:start position:0%
um maybe this one
esoteric<00:17:19.140><c> maybe</c><00:17:19.319><c> but</c>

00:17:20.630 --> 00:17:20.640 align:start position:0%
esoteric maybe but
 

00:17:20.640 --> 00:17:22.789 align:start position:0%
esoteric maybe but
um<00:17:20.760><c> another</c><00:17:21.480><c> interesting</c><00:17:22.319><c> mechanism</c><00:17:22.559><c> in</c>

00:17:22.789 --> 00:17:22.799 align:start position:0%
um another interesting mechanism in
 

00:17:22.799 --> 00:17:24.289 align:start position:0%
um another interesting mechanism in
terms<00:17:22.980><c> of</c><00:17:23.040><c> security</c><00:17:23.220><c> that</c><00:17:23.520><c> I</c><00:17:23.699><c> really</c><00:17:23.819><c> like</c><00:17:24.000><c> is</c>

00:17:24.289 --> 00:17:24.299 align:start position:0%
terms of security that I really like is
 

00:17:24.299 --> 00:17:27.409 align:start position:0%
terms of security that I really like is
this<00:17:25.020><c> um</c><00:17:25.020><c> ultrasound</c><00:17:25.620><c> uh</c><00:17:26.520><c> money</c><00:17:26.760><c> one</c><00:17:27.059><c> where</c>

00:17:27.409 --> 00:17:27.419 align:start position:0%
this um ultrasound uh money one where
 

00:17:27.419 --> 00:17:29.390 align:start position:0%
this um ultrasound uh money one where
basically<00:17:27.720><c> the</c><00:17:27.839><c> idea</c><00:17:28.079><c> is</c><00:17:28.260><c> when</c><00:17:28.620><c> you</c><00:17:28.799><c> have</c><00:17:28.980><c> an</c>

00:17:29.390 --> 00:17:29.400 align:start position:0%
basically the idea is when you have an
 

00:17:29.400 --> 00:17:31.669 align:start position:0%
basically the idea is when you have an
normal<00:17:30.120><c> mining</c><00:17:30.540><c> rewards</c><00:17:30.960><c> that</c><00:17:31.140><c> means</c><00:17:31.320><c> that</c><00:17:31.500><c> we</c>

00:17:31.669 --> 00:17:31.679 align:start position:0%
normal mining rewards that means that we
 

00:17:31.679 --> 00:17:32.409 align:start position:0%
normal mining rewards that means that we
have

00:17:32.409 --> 00:17:32.419 align:start position:0%
have
 

00:17:32.419 --> 00:17:34.970 align:start position:0%
have
as<00:17:33.419><c> the</c><00:17:33.600><c> asset</c><00:17:33.840><c> has</c><00:17:34.020><c> this</c><00:17:34.320><c> much</c><00:17:34.500><c> improved</c>

00:17:34.970 --> 00:17:34.980 align:start position:0%
as the asset has this much improved
 

00:17:34.980 --> 00:17:37.970 align:start position:0%
as the asset has this much improved
monetary<00:17:35.460><c> properties</c><00:17:36.020><c> which</c><00:17:37.020><c> in</c><00:17:37.260><c> long</c><00:17:37.799><c> run</c>

00:17:37.970 --> 00:17:37.980 align:start position:0%
monetary properties which in long run
 

00:17:37.980 --> 00:17:40.130 align:start position:0%
monetary properties which in long run
might<00:17:38.760><c> you</c><00:17:39.240><c> know</c><00:17:39.299><c> might</c><00:17:39.480><c> or</c><00:17:39.660><c> might</c><00:17:39.900><c> not</c><00:17:39.960><c> turn</c>

00:17:40.130 --> 00:17:40.140 align:start position:0%
might you know might or might not turn
 

00:17:40.140 --> 00:17:41.810 align:start position:0%
might you know might or might not turn
into<00:17:40.320><c> a</c><00:17:40.500><c> higher</c><00:17:40.679><c> expected</c><00:17:41.039><c> monetary</c><00:17:41.400><c> premium</c>

00:17:41.810 --> 00:17:41.820 align:start position:0%
into a higher expected monetary premium
 

00:17:41.820 --> 00:17:44.090 align:start position:0%
into a higher expected monetary premium
higher<00:17:42.480><c> total</c><00:17:42.660><c> eth</c><00:17:42.960><c> market</c><00:17:43.140><c> cap</c><00:17:43.380><c> and</c><00:17:43.740><c> we</c><00:17:43.919><c> can</c>

00:17:44.090 --> 00:17:44.100 align:start position:0%
higher total eth market cap and we can
 

00:17:44.100 --> 00:17:46.789 align:start position:0%
higher total eth market cap and we can
just<00:17:44.280><c> buy</c><00:17:44.520><c> more</c><00:17:44.760><c> Security</c><00:17:45.000><c> in</c><00:17:45.419><c> absolute</c><00:17:46.020><c> terms</c>

00:17:46.789 --> 00:17:46.799 align:start position:0%
just buy more Security in absolute terms
 

00:17:46.799 --> 00:17:48.650 align:start position:0%
just buy more Security in absolute terms
but<00:17:47.160><c> again</c><00:17:47.340><c> you</c><00:17:47.520><c> know</c><00:17:47.640><c> this</c><00:17:47.760><c> is</c><00:17:47.880><c> esoteric</c>

00:17:48.650 --> 00:17:48.660 align:start position:0%
but again you know this is esoteric
 

00:17:48.660 --> 00:17:50.029 align:start position:0%
but again you know this is esoteric
totally<00:17:49.020><c> fine</c><00:17:49.140><c> if</c><00:17:49.320><c> you</c><00:17:49.440><c> don't</c><00:17:49.500><c> buy</c><00:17:49.679><c> into</c><00:17:49.799><c> this</c>

00:17:50.029 --> 00:17:50.039 align:start position:0%
totally fine if you don't buy into this
 

00:17:50.039 --> 00:17:51.890 align:start position:0%
totally fine if you don't buy into this
that<00:17:50.460><c> the</c><00:17:50.700><c> first</c><00:17:50.820><c> bullet</c><00:17:51.179><c> point</c><00:17:51.299><c> is</c><00:17:51.480><c> the</c><00:17:51.780><c> more</c>

00:17:51.890 --> 00:17:51.900 align:start position:0%
that the first bullet point is the more
 

00:17:51.900 --> 00:17:53.570 align:start position:0%
that the first bullet point is the more
important<00:17:52.140><c> one</c><00:17:52.320><c> here</c>

00:17:53.570 --> 00:17:53.580 align:start position:0%
important one here
 

00:17:53.580 --> 00:17:56.390 align:start position:0%
important one here
um<00:17:53.640><c> okay</c><00:17:54.000><c> so</c><00:17:54.660><c> this</c><00:17:55.080><c> is</c><00:17:55.200><c> ethereum</c><00:17:55.620><c> today</c><00:17:55.799><c> uh</c>

00:17:56.390 --> 00:17:56.400 align:start position:0%
um okay so this is ethereum today uh
 

00:17:56.400 --> 00:17:57.890 align:start position:0%
um okay so this is ethereum today uh
where<00:17:56.520><c> do</c><00:17:56.700><c> we</c><00:17:56.760><c> want</c><00:17:56.880><c> to</c><00:17:57.000><c> go</c><00:17:57.120><c> uh</c><00:17:57.600><c> how</c><00:17:57.720><c> do</c><00:17:57.840><c> we</c>

00:17:57.890 --> 00:17:57.900 align:start position:0%
where do we want to go uh how do we
 

00:17:57.900 --> 00:17:59.270 align:start position:0%
where do we want to go uh how do we
actually<00:17:58.020><c> get</c><00:17:58.260><c> to</c><00:17:58.440><c> this</c><00:17:58.620><c> full</c><00:17:58.860><c> you</c><00:17:59.220><c> know</c>

00:17:59.270 --> 00:17:59.280 align:start position:0%
actually get to this full you know
 

00:17:59.280 --> 00:18:01.730 align:start position:0%
actually get to this full you know
settlement<00:18:00.000><c> chain</c><00:18:00.240><c> uh</c><00:18:01.020><c> how</c><00:18:01.200><c> do</c><00:18:01.320><c> we</c><00:18:01.380><c> get</c><00:18:01.500><c> full</c>

00:18:01.730 --> 00:18:01.740 align:start position:0%
settlement chain uh how do we get full
 

00:18:01.740 --> 00:18:03.169 align:start position:0%
settlement chain uh how do we get full
data<00:18:02.100><c> availability</c><00:18:02.340><c> all</c><00:18:02.640><c> of</c><00:18:02.820><c> that</c><00:18:02.940><c> kind</c><00:18:03.120><c> of</c>

00:18:03.169 --> 00:18:03.179 align:start position:0%
data availability all of that kind of
 

00:18:03.179 --> 00:18:05.930 align:start position:0%
data availability all of that kind of
thing<00:18:03.299><c> so</c><00:18:03.660><c> first</c><00:18:04.620><c> thing</c><00:18:04.860><c> is</c><00:18:05.520><c> next</c><00:18:05.760><c> year</c>

00:18:05.930 --> 00:18:05.940 align:start position:0%
thing so first thing is next year
 

00:18:05.940 --> 00:18:07.909 align:start position:0%
thing so first thing is next year
hopefully<00:18:06.360><c> a</c><00:18:06.660><c> fingers</c><00:18:07.020><c> crossed</c>

00:18:07.909 --> 00:18:07.919 align:start position:0%
hopefully a fingers crossed
 

00:18:07.919 --> 00:18:10.070 align:start position:0%
hopefully a fingers crossed
um looking<00:18:08.160><c> good</c><00:18:08.400><c> I</c><00:18:08.760><c> have</c><00:18:08.940><c> to</c><00:18:09.120><c> say</c><00:18:09.240><c> uh</c>

00:18:10.070 --> 00:18:10.080 align:start position:0%
um looking good I have to say uh
 

00:18:10.080 --> 00:18:13.070 align:start position:0%
um looking good I have to say uh
prototype<00:18:10.620><c> starting</c><00:18:10.880><c> erp4844</c><00:18:11.880><c> that</c><00:18:12.840><c> we've</c>

00:18:13.070 --> 00:18:13.080 align:start position:0%
prototype starting erp4844 that we've
 

00:18:13.080 --> 00:18:14.510 align:start position:0%
prototype starting erp4844 that we've
been<00:18:13.200><c> really</c><00:18:13.440><c> actively</c><00:18:13.860><c> working</c><00:18:14.100><c> on</c><00:18:14.280><c> just</c>

00:18:14.510 --> 00:18:14.520 align:start position:0%
been really actively working on just
 

00:18:14.520 --> 00:18:16.130 align:start position:0%
been really actively working on just
earlier<00:18:14.880><c> today</c><00:18:15.000><c> there</c><00:18:15.299><c> was</c><00:18:15.419><c> there</c><00:18:15.660><c> was</c><00:18:16.020><c> a</c>

00:18:16.130 --> 00:18:16.140 align:start position:0%
earlier today there was there was a
 

00:18:16.140 --> 00:18:17.690 align:start position:0%
earlier today there was there was a
session<00:18:16.260><c> on</c><00:18:16.440><c> this</c>

00:18:17.690 --> 00:18:17.700 align:start position:0%
session on this
 

00:18:17.700 --> 00:18:20.630 align:start position:0%
session on this
um<00:18:17.820><c> where</c><00:18:18.419><c> basically</c><00:18:18.840><c> uh</c><00:18:19.559><c> we</c><00:18:19.919><c> I</c><00:18:20.160><c> don't</c><00:18:20.460><c> know</c><00:18:20.520><c> if</c>

00:18:20.630 --> 00:18:20.640 align:start position:0%
um where basically uh we I don't know if
 

00:18:20.640 --> 00:18:22.370 align:start position:0%
um where basically uh we I don't know if
you<00:18:20.760><c> saw</c><00:18:20.940><c> that</c><00:18:21.059><c> but</c><00:18:21.179><c> like</c><00:18:21.360><c> the</c><00:18:21.480><c> data</c><00:18:21.840><c> pick</c><00:18:22.020><c> the</c>

00:18:22.370 --> 00:18:22.380 align:start position:0%
you saw that but like the data pick the
 

00:18:22.380 --> 00:18:24.169 align:start position:0%
you saw that but like the data pick the
data<00:18:22.620><c> symbol</c><00:18:22.919><c> there</c><00:18:23.100><c> just</c><00:18:23.340><c> become</c><00:18:23.520><c> became</c><00:18:24.000><c> way</c>

00:18:24.169 --> 00:18:24.179 align:start position:0%
data symbol there just become became way
 

00:18:24.179 --> 00:18:26.210 align:start position:0%
data symbol there just become became way
bigger<00:18:24.600><c> because</c><00:18:25.020><c> you</c><00:18:25.260><c> just</c><00:18:25.500><c> you</c><00:18:25.679><c> know</c><00:18:25.740><c> you</c><00:18:25.919><c> you</c>

00:18:26.210 --> 00:18:26.220 align:start position:0%
bigger because you just you know you you
 

00:18:26.220 --> 00:18:28.730 align:start position:0%
bigger because you just you know you you
add<00:18:26.700><c> better</c><00:18:26.880><c> data</c><00:18:27.240><c> availability</c><00:18:27.620><c> to</c><00:18:28.620><c> the</c>

00:18:28.730 --> 00:18:28.740 align:start position:0%
add better data availability to the
 

00:18:28.740 --> 00:18:30.230 align:start position:0%
add better data availability to the
ethereum<00:18:29.100><c> chain</c><00:18:29.220><c> for</c><00:18:29.460><c> the</c><00:18:29.580><c> first</c><00:18:29.700><c> time</c><00:18:29.820><c> data</c>

00:18:30.230 --> 00:18:30.240 align:start position:0%
ethereum chain for the first time data
 

00:18:30.240 --> 00:18:32.270 align:start position:0%
ethereum chain for the first time data
availability<00:18:30.539><c> is</c><00:18:30.780><c> an</c><00:18:31.320><c> explicit</c><00:18:31.799><c> service</c><00:18:31.980><c> we</c>

00:18:32.270 --> 00:18:32.280 align:start position:0%
availability is an explicit service we
 

00:18:32.280 --> 00:18:34.010 align:start position:0%
availability is an explicit service we
provide<00:18:32.580><c> it's</c><00:18:33.059><c> not</c><00:18:33.179><c> just</c><00:18:33.360><c> something</c><00:18:33.539><c> tucked</c>

00:18:34.010 --> 00:18:34.020 align:start position:0%
provide it's not just something tucked
 

00:18:34.020 --> 00:18:35.510 align:start position:0%
provide it's not just something tucked
on<00:18:34.140><c> but</c><00:18:34.320><c> it's</c><00:18:34.500><c> an</c><00:18:34.620><c> explicit</c><00:18:35.039><c> service</c><00:18:35.160><c> and</c><00:18:35.400><c> so</c>

00:18:35.510 --> 00:18:35.520 align:start position:0%
on but it's an explicit service and so
 

00:18:35.520 --> 00:18:37.190 align:start position:0%
on but it's an explicit service and so
it's<00:18:35.700><c> just</c><00:18:35.880><c> more</c><00:18:36.299><c> effective</c>

00:18:37.190 --> 00:18:37.200 align:start position:0%
it's just more effective
 

00:18:37.200 --> 00:18:40.130 align:start position:0%
it's just more effective
and<00:18:37.740><c> then</c><00:18:38.160><c> of</c><00:18:38.400><c> course</c><00:18:38.580><c> uh</c><00:18:39.480><c> you've</c><00:18:39.840><c> you've</c>

00:18:40.130 --> 00:18:40.140 align:start position:0%
and then of course uh you've you've
 

00:18:40.140 --> 00:18:41.450 align:start position:0%
and then of course uh you've you've
probably<00:18:40.260><c> all</c><00:18:40.440><c> heard</c><00:18:40.620><c> about</c><00:18:40.740><c> that</c><00:18:40.980><c> tongue</c>

00:18:41.450 --> 00:18:41.460 align:start position:0%
probably all heard about that tongue
 

00:18:41.460 --> 00:18:45.110 align:start position:0%
probably all heard about that tongue
sharding<00:18:41.880><c> soon</c><00:18:42.480><c> TM</c><00:18:43.160><c> afterwards</c><00:18:44.160><c> uh</c><00:18:44.940><c> that</c>

00:18:45.110 --> 00:18:45.120 align:start position:0%
sharding soon TM afterwards uh that
 

00:18:45.120 --> 00:18:46.850 align:start position:0%
sharding soon TM afterwards uh that
could<00:18:45.299><c> be</c><00:18:45.419><c> two</c><00:18:45.660><c> years</c><00:18:45.780><c> from</c><00:18:45.960><c> now</c><00:18:46.140><c> hopefully</c>

00:18:46.850 --> 00:18:46.860 align:start position:0%
could be two years from now hopefully
 

00:18:46.860 --> 00:18:48.529 align:start position:0%
could be two years from now hopefully
like<00:18:47.220><c> maybe</c><00:18:47.400><c> maybe</c><00:18:47.640><c> it'll</c><00:18:48.059><c> be</c><00:18:48.240><c> three</c><00:18:48.360><c> years</c>

00:18:48.529 --> 00:18:48.539 align:start position:0%
like maybe maybe it'll be three years
 

00:18:48.539 --> 00:18:50.390 align:start position:0%
like maybe maybe it'll be three years
but<00:18:48.780><c> but</c><00:18:49.080><c> soon</c>

00:18:50.390 --> 00:18:50.400 align:start position:0%
but but soon
 

00:18:50.400 --> 00:18:52.370 align:start position:0%
but but soon
um<00:18:50.580><c> uh</c><00:18:51.120><c> and</c><00:18:51.360><c> and</c><00:18:51.419><c> that's</c><00:18:51.720><c> really</c><00:18:51.840><c> where</c><00:18:52.080><c> we</c><00:18:52.260><c> get</c>

00:18:52.370 --> 00:18:52.380 align:start position:0%
um uh and and that's really where we get
 

00:18:52.380 --> 00:18:55.250 align:start position:0%
um uh and and that's really where we get
like<00:18:52.679><c> Ultra</c><00:18:53.340><c> scalable</c><00:18:53.760><c> data</c>

00:18:55.250 --> 00:18:55.260 align:start position:0%
like Ultra scalable data
 

00:18:55.260 --> 00:18:57.289 align:start position:0%
like Ultra scalable data
um<00:18:55.380><c> and</c><00:18:55.679><c> and</c><00:18:55.919><c> and</c><00:18:56.100><c> with</c><00:18:56.520><c> that</c><00:18:56.640><c> we</c><00:18:56.820><c> will</c><00:18:57.000><c> be</c><00:18:57.120><c> for</c>

00:18:57.289 --> 00:18:57.299 align:start position:0%
um and and and with that we will be for
 

00:18:57.299 --> 00:19:00.110 align:start position:0%
um and and and with that we will be for
the<00:18:57.480><c> basically</c><00:18:58.140><c> we</c><00:18:58.380><c> will</c><00:18:58.500><c> be</c><00:18:58.679><c> able</c><00:18:58.919><c> to</c><00:18:58.980><c> to</c>

00:19:00.110 --> 00:19:00.120 align:start position:0%
the basically we will be able to to
 

00:19:00.120 --> 00:19:02.390 align:start position:0%
the basically we will be able to to
um<00:19:00.179><c> to</c><00:19:00.660><c> host</c><00:19:00.840><c> multiple</c><00:19:01.440><c> of</c><00:19:01.620><c> these</c><00:19:01.919><c> really</c><00:19:02.100><c> high</c>

00:19:02.390 --> 00:19:02.400 align:start position:0%
um to host multiple of these really high
 

00:19:02.400 --> 00:19:04.130 align:start position:0%
um to host multiple of these really high
throughput<00:19:02.820><c> Roll-Ups</c><00:19:03.360><c> so</c><00:19:03.419><c> this</c><00:19:03.720><c> is</c><00:19:03.840><c> kind</c><00:19:04.020><c> of</c>

00:19:04.130 --> 00:19:04.140 align:start position:0%
throughput Roll-Ups so this is kind of
 

00:19:04.140 --> 00:19:05.870 align:start position:0%
throughput Roll-Ups so this is kind of
in<00:19:04.380><c> terms</c><00:19:04.620><c> of</c><00:19:04.679><c> scalability</c><00:19:05.220><c> this</c><00:19:05.640><c> is</c><00:19:05.700><c> really</c>

00:19:05.870 --> 00:19:05.880 align:start position:0%
in terms of scalability this is really
 

00:19:05.880 --> 00:19:07.549 align:start position:0%
in terms of scalability this is really
the<00:19:06.120><c> end</c><00:19:06.299><c> game</c>

00:19:07.549 --> 00:19:07.559 align:start position:0%
the end game
 

00:19:07.559 --> 00:19:09.770 align:start position:0%
the end game
um<00:19:07.679><c> that</c><00:19:08.100><c> that</c><00:19:08.220><c> we</c><00:19:08.640><c> as</c><00:19:08.820><c> ethereum</c><00:19:09.360><c> basically</c>

00:19:09.770 --> 00:19:09.780 align:start position:0%
um that that we as ethereum basically
 

00:19:09.780 --> 00:19:12.169 align:start position:0%
um that that we as ethereum basically
are<00:19:10.020><c> are</c><00:19:10.260><c> aiming</c><00:19:10.919><c> for</c>

00:19:12.169 --> 00:19:12.179 align:start position:0%
are are aiming for
 

00:19:12.179 --> 00:19:15.230 align:start position:0%
are are aiming for
um<00:19:12.240><c> and</c><00:19:12.679><c> basically</c><00:19:13.679><c> kind</c><00:19:13.980><c> of</c><00:19:14.100><c> with</c><00:19:14.700><c> those</c>

00:19:15.230 --> 00:19:15.240 align:start position:0%
um and basically kind of with those
 

00:19:15.240 --> 00:19:16.669 align:start position:0%
um and basically kind of with those
pictures<00:19:15.480><c> in</c><00:19:15.780><c> mind</c><00:19:15.960><c> I</c><00:19:16.140><c> kind</c><00:19:16.260><c> of</c><00:19:16.320><c> wanted</c><00:19:16.440><c> to</c>

00:19:16.669 --> 00:19:16.679 align:start position:0%
pictures in mind I kind of wanted to
 

00:19:16.679 --> 00:19:18.830 align:start position:0%
pictures in mind I kind of wanted to
then<00:19:16.919><c> for</c><00:19:17.400><c> the</c><00:19:17.580><c> for</c><00:19:17.700><c> the</c><00:19:17.880><c> last</c><00:19:18.059><c> part</c><00:19:18.299><c> talk</c><00:19:18.660><c> a</c>

00:19:18.830 --> 00:19:18.840 align:start position:0%
then for the for the last part talk a
 

00:19:18.840 --> 00:19:21.049 align:start position:0%
then for the for the last part talk a
little<00:19:18.900><c> bit</c><00:19:19.020><c> about</c><00:19:19.520><c> where</c><00:19:20.520><c> does</c><00:19:20.700><c> this</c><00:19:20.880><c> leave</c>

00:19:21.049 --> 00:19:21.059 align:start position:0%
little bit about where does this leave
 

00:19:21.059 --> 00:19:23.630 align:start position:0%
little bit about where does this leave
us<00:19:21.299><c> like</c><00:19:21.660><c> this</c><00:19:21.960><c> I</c><00:19:22.380><c> I</c><00:19:22.559><c> hope</c><00:19:22.860><c> that</c><00:19:23.039><c> kind</c><00:19:23.340><c> of</c><00:19:23.460><c> gave</c>

00:19:23.630 --> 00:19:23.640 align:start position:0%
us like this I I hope that kind of gave
 

00:19:23.640 --> 00:19:26.029 align:start position:0%
us like this I I hope that kind of gave
it<00:19:23.820><c> like</c><00:19:23.940><c> intuition</c><00:19:24.419><c> wise</c><00:19:24.780><c> like</c><00:19:25.080><c> a</c><00:19:25.320><c> good</c><00:19:25.679><c> idea</c>

00:19:26.029 --> 00:19:26.039 align:start position:0%
it like intuition wise like a good idea
 

00:19:26.039 --> 00:19:28.310 align:start position:0%
it like intuition wise like a good idea
of<00:19:26.220><c> where</c><00:19:26.400><c> we're</c><00:19:26.820><c> moving</c><00:19:27.000><c> and</c><00:19:27.299><c> why</c><00:19:27.780><c> but</c><00:19:28.020><c> but</c>

00:19:28.310 --> 00:19:28.320 align:start position:0%
of where we're moving and why but but
 

00:19:28.320 --> 00:19:30.529 align:start position:0%
of where we're moving and why but but
what<00:19:28.740><c> implications</c><00:19:29.160><c> does</c><00:19:29.520><c> that</c><00:19:29.640><c> have</c><00:19:29.880><c> so</c><00:19:30.299><c> the</c>

00:19:30.529 --> 00:19:30.539 align:start position:0%
what implications does that have so the
 

00:19:30.539 --> 00:19:31.850 align:start position:0%
what implications does that have so the
first<00:19:30.660><c> first</c><00:19:30.960><c> thing</c><00:19:31.140><c> I</c><00:19:31.320><c> wanted</c><00:19:31.440><c> to</c><00:19:31.559><c> briefly</c>

00:19:31.850 --> 00:19:31.860 align:start position:0%
first first thing I wanted to briefly
 

00:19:31.860 --> 00:19:33.409 align:start position:0%
first first thing I wanted to briefly
talk<00:19:32.039><c> about</c><00:19:32.160><c> what</c><00:19:32.640><c> does</c><00:19:32.760><c> it</c><00:19:32.880><c> mean</c><00:19:33.000><c> for</c><00:19:33.179><c> the</c>

00:19:33.409 --> 00:19:33.419 align:start position:0%
talk about what does it mean for the
 

00:19:33.419 --> 00:19:35.390 align:start position:0%
talk about what does it mean for the
existing<00:19:33.780><c> well</c><00:19:34.260><c> it</c><00:19:34.559><c> one</c><00:19:34.799><c> we</c><00:19:34.980><c> used</c><00:19:35.100><c> to</c><00:19:35.220><c> call</c><00:19:35.340><c> it</c>

00:19:35.390 --> 00:19:35.400 align:start position:0%
existing well it one we used to call it
 

00:19:35.400 --> 00:19:37.130 align:start position:0%
existing well it one we used to call it
it<00:19:35.520><c> one</c><00:19:35.820><c> chain</c><00:19:36.000><c> like</c><00:19:36.299><c> basically</c><00:19:36.660><c> what</c><00:19:36.840><c> now</c><00:19:36.960><c> is</c>

00:19:37.130 --> 00:19:37.140 align:start position:0%
it one chain like basically what now is
 

00:19:37.140 --> 00:19:39.110 align:start position:0%
it one chain like basically what now is
the<00:19:37.620><c> execution</c><00:19:37.980><c> chain</c><00:19:38.220><c> with</c><00:19:38.460><c> within</c><00:19:39.000><c> the</c>

00:19:39.110 --> 00:19:39.120 align:start position:0%
the execution chain with within the
 

00:19:39.120 --> 00:19:41.330 align:start position:0%
the execution chain with within the
beacon<00:19:39.360><c> chain</c><00:19:39.620><c> what's</c><00:19:40.620><c> the</c><00:19:40.799><c> future</c><00:19:40.919><c> of</c><00:19:41.160><c> that</c>

00:19:41.330 --> 00:19:41.340 align:start position:0%
beacon chain what's the future of that
 

00:19:41.340 --> 00:19:43.549 align:start position:0%
beacon chain what's the future of that
and<00:19:42.000><c> um</c><00:19:42.059><c> they</c><00:19:42.299><c> are</c><00:19:42.480><c> basically</c><00:19:42.720><c> multiple</c>

00:19:43.549 --> 00:19:43.559 align:start position:0%
and um they are basically multiple
 

00:19:43.559 --> 00:19:44.990 align:start position:0%
and um they are basically multiple
different

00:19:44.990 --> 00:19:45.000 align:start position:0%
different
 

00:19:45.000 --> 00:19:46.970 align:start position:0%
different
um<00:19:45.120><c> potential</c><00:19:45.840><c> future</c><00:19:46.140><c> Visions</c><00:19:46.559><c> for</c><00:19:46.740><c> it</c><00:19:46.860><c> that</c>

00:19:46.970 --> 00:19:46.980 align:start position:0%
um potential future Visions for it that
 

00:19:46.980 --> 00:19:48.409 align:start position:0%
um potential future Visions for it that
you<00:19:47.100><c> could</c><00:19:47.220><c> you</c><00:19:47.460><c> could</c><00:19:47.760><c> you</c><00:19:47.940><c> could</c><00:19:48.059><c> see</c><00:19:48.179><c> the</c>

00:19:48.409 --> 00:19:48.419 align:start position:0%
you could you could you could see the
 

00:19:48.419 --> 00:19:50.270 align:start position:0%
you could you could you could see the
first<00:19:48.539><c> one</c><00:19:48.720><c> would</c><00:19:48.900><c> be</c><00:19:49.020><c> that</c><00:19:49.260><c> you</c><00:19:49.440><c> it</c><00:19:49.980><c> basically</c>

00:19:50.270 --> 00:19:50.280 align:start position:0%
first one would be that you it basically
 

00:19:50.280 --> 00:19:52.549 align:start position:0%
first one would be that you it basically
stays<00:19:50.700><c> this</c><00:19:51.059><c> hybrid</c><00:19:51.539><c> execution</c><00:19:52.080><c> settlement</c>

00:19:52.549 --> 00:19:52.559 align:start position:0%
stays this hybrid execution settlement
 

00:19:52.559 --> 00:19:54.350 align:start position:0%
stays this hybrid execution settlement
chain<00:19:52.919><c> or</c><00:19:53.220><c> the</c><00:19:53.340><c> roll-up</c><00:19:53.580><c> settle</c><00:19:53.940><c> on</c><00:19:54.000><c> top</c><00:19:54.120><c> of</c><00:19:54.240><c> it</c>

00:19:54.350 --> 00:19:54.360 align:start position:0%
chain or the roll-up settle on top of it
 

00:19:54.360 --> 00:19:56.870 align:start position:0%
chain or the roll-up settle on top of it
but<00:19:54.600><c> also</c><00:19:54.960><c> still</c><00:19:55.620><c> you</c><00:19:55.980><c> know</c><00:19:56.100><c> it</c><00:19:56.280><c> has</c><00:19:56.640><c> some</c>

00:19:56.870 --> 00:19:56.880 align:start position:0%
but also still you know it has some
 

00:19:56.880 --> 00:19:59.090 align:start position:0%
but also still you know it has some
default<00:19:57.360><c> on</c><00:19:57.419><c> it</c><00:19:57.539><c> whatever</c><00:19:57.900><c> for</c><00:19:58.679><c> high</c><00:19:58.919><c> value</c>

00:19:59.090 --> 00:19:59.100 align:start position:0%
default on it whatever for high value
 

00:19:59.100 --> 00:20:00.590 align:start position:0%
default on it whatever for high value
transaction<00:19:59.520><c> it</c><00:19:59.760><c> can</c><00:19:59.880><c> still</c><00:20:00.000><c> be</c><00:20:00.120><c> used</c><00:20:00.240><c> as</c><00:20:00.419><c> an</c>

00:20:00.590 --> 00:20:00.600 align:start position:0%
transaction it can still be used as an
 

00:20:00.600 --> 00:20:02.630 align:start position:0%
transaction it can still be used as an
execution<00:20:00.960><c> chain</c><00:20:01.200><c> so</c><00:20:01.440><c> that</c><00:20:01.559><c> would</c><00:20:01.740><c> be</c><00:20:01.980><c> kind</c><00:20:02.520><c> of</c>

00:20:02.630 --> 00:20:02.640 align:start position:0%
execution chain so that would be kind of
 

00:20:02.640 --> 00:20:04.970 align:start position:0%
execution chain so that would be kind of
the<00:20:02.820><c> default</c><00:20:03.179><c> case</c>

00:20:04.970 --> 00:20:04.980 align:start position:0%
the default case
 

00:20:04.980 --> 00:20:06.409 align:start position:0%
the default case
um<00:20:05.100><c> then</c><00:20:05.340><c> we</c><00:20:05.520><c> we</c><00:20:05.700><c> could</c><00:20:05.880><c> we</c><00:20:06.059><c> could</c><00:20:06.179><c> have</c><00:20:06.299><c> the</c>

00:20:06.409 --> 00:20:06.419 align:start position:0%
um then we we could we could have the
 

00:20:06.419 --> 00:20:08.150 align:start position:0%
um then we we could we could have the
scenario<00:20:06.780><c> where</c><00:20:06.960><c> it</c><00:20:07.140><c> really</c><00:20:07.320><c> turns</c><00:20:07.740><c> over</c><00:20:07.860><c> time</c>

00:20:08.150 --> 00:20:08.160 align:start position:0%
scenario where it really turns over time
 

00:20:08.160 --> 00:20:10.909 align:start position:0%
scenario where it really turns over time
one<00:20:08.400><c> more</c><00:20:08.640><c> primarily</c><00:20:09.179><c> into</c><00:20:09.419><c> a</c><00:20:09.919><c> pure</c>

00:20:10.909 --> 00:20:10.919 align:start position:0%
one more primarily into a pure
 

00:20:10.919 --> 00:20:12.409 align:start position:0%
one more primarily into a pure
settlement<00:20:11.340><c> chain</c><00:20:11.580><c> so</c><00:20:11.820><c> that</c><00:20:11.940><c> means</c><00:20:12.240><c> that</c>

00:20:12.409 --> 00:20:12.419 align:start position:0%
settlement chain so that means that
 

00:20:12.419 --> 00:20:13.909 align:start position:0%
settlement chain so that means that
really<00:20:12.840><c> more</c><00:20:13.140><c> and</c><00:20:13.320><c> more</c><00:20:13.500><c> of</c><00:20:13.559><c> the</c><00:20:13.679><c> user</c>

00:20:13.909 --> 00:20:13.919 align:start position:0%
really more and more of the user
 

00:20:13.919 --> 00:20:15.770 align:start position:0%
really more and more of the user
activity<00:20:14.160><c> migrates</c><00:20:14.580><c> layer</c><00:20:14.940><c> twos</c><00:20:15.179><c> and</c><00:20:15.419><c> and</c>

00:20:15.770 --> 00:20:15.780 align:start position:0%
activity migrates layer twos and and
 

00:20:15.780 --> 00:20:18.650 align:start position:0%
activity migrates layer twos and and
layer<00:20:16.140><c> one</c><00:20:16.260><c> is</c><00:20:16.440><c> really</c><00:20:16.620><c> just</c><00:20:17.539><c> becoming</c><00:20:18.539><c> more</c>

00:20:18.650 --> 00:20:18.660 align:start position:0%
layer one is really just becoming more
 

00:20:18.660 --> 00:20:19.970 align:start position:0%
layer one is really just becoming more
more<00:20:18.840><c> just</c><00:20:19.020><c> just</c><00:20:19.320><c> a</c><00:20:19.500><c> rollout</c><00:20:19.799><c> management</c>

00:20:19.970 --> 00:20:19.980 align:start position:0%
more just just a rollout management
 

00:20:19.980 --> 00:20:22.190 align:start position:0%
more just just a rollout management
layer<00:20:20.460><c> and</c><00:20:21.000><c> then</c><00:20:21.059><c> the</c><00:20:21.240><c> third</c><00:20:21.360><c> one</c><00:20:21.539><c> it's</c><00:20:22.020><c> more</c>

00:20:22.190 --> 00:20:22.200 align:start position:0%
layer and then the third one it's more
 

00:20:22.200 --> 00:20:24.350 align:start position:0%
layer and then the third one it's more
like<00:20:22.380><c> a</c><00:20:22.500><c> fun</c><00:20:22.679><c> thought</c><00:20:22.919><c> experiment</c><00:20:23.460><c> it's</c><00:20:24.000><c> not</c>

00:20:24.350 --> 00:20:24.360 align:start position:0%
like a fun thought experiment it's not
 

00:20:24.360 --> 00:20:25.850 align:start position:0%
like a fun thought experiment it's not
really<00:20:24.539><c> kind</c><00:20:24.840><c> of</c><00:20:24.960><c> planned</c><00:20:25.260><c> or</c><00:20:25.380><c> anything</c><00:20:25.500><c> but</c>

00:20:25.850 --> 00:20:25.860 align:start position:0%
really kind of planned or anything but
 

00:20:25.860 --> 00:20:27.409 align:start position:0%
really kind of planned or anything but
just<00:20:26.280><c> wanted</c><00:20:26.400><c> to</c><00:20:26.580><c> kind</c><00:20:26.760><c> of</c><00:20:26.820><c> illustrate</c><00:20:27.179><c> how</c>

00:20:27.409 --> 00:20:27.419 align:start position:0%
just wanted to kind of illustrate how
 

00:20:27.419 --> 00:20:29.630 align:start position:0%
just wanted to kind of illustrate how
this<00:20:27.539><c> modular</c><00:20:28.280><c> architecture</c><00:20:29.280><c> is</c><00:20:29.460><c> really</c>

00:20:29.630 --> 00:20:29.640 align:start position:0%
this modular architecture is really
 

00:20:29.640 --> 00:20:31.909 align:start position:0%
this modular architecture is really
lends<00:20:30.240><c> itself</c><00:20:30.419><c> to</c><00:20:30.780><c> to</c><00:20:31.020><c> all</c><00:20:31.200><c> these</c><00:20:31.440><c> these</c>

00:20:31.909 --> 00:20:31.919 align:start position:0%
lends itself to to all these these
 

00:20:31.919 --> 00:20:33.950 align:start position:0%
lends itself to to all these these
different<00:20:32.280><c> different</c><00:20:32.580><c> ideas</c><00:20:32.940><c> what</c><00:20:33.660><c> we</c><00:20:33.840><c> could</c>

00:20:33.950 --> 00:20:33.960 align:start position:0%
different different ideas what we could
 

00:20:33.960 --> 00:20:36.590 align:start position:0%
different different ideas what we could
also<00:20:34.200><c> do</c><00:20:34.320><c> is</c><00:20:34.500><c> that</c><00:20:34.740><c> we</c><00:20:34.919><c> could</c><00:20:35.100><c> uh</c><00:20:36.000><c> it</c><00:20:36.240><c> basically</c>

00:20:36.590 --> 00:20:36.600 align:start position:0%
also do is that we could uh it basically
 

00:20:36.600 --> 00:20:39.350 align:start position:0%
also do is that we could uh it basically
add<00:20:37.380><c> in</c><00:20:37.740><c> an</c><00:20:37.980><c> additional</c><00:20:38.400><c> separate</c><00:20:38.880><c> set</c><00:20:39.120><c> of</c>

00:20:39.350 --> 00:20:39.360 align:start position:0%
add in an additional separate set of
 

00:20:39.360 --> 00:20:41.750 align:start position:0%
add in an additional separate set of
pure<00:20:39.600><c> settlement</c><00:20:40.020><c> chain</c><00:20:40.260><c> to</c><00:20:40.740><c> to</c><00:20:40.980><c> the</c><00:20:41.400><c> beacon</c>

00:20:41.750 --> 00:20:41.760 align:start position:0%
pure settlement chain to to the beacon
 

00:20:41.760 --> 00:20:45.049 align:start position:0%
pure settlement chain to to the beacon
chain<00:20:42.000><c> and</c><00:20:42.660><c> turn</c><00:20:42.840><c> is</c><00:20:43.140><c> one</c><00:20:43.559><c> basically</c><00:20:44.400><c> into</c><00:20:44.640><c> a</c>

00:20:45.049 --> 00:20:45.059 align:start position:0%
chain and turn is one basically into a
 

00:20:45.059 --> 00:20:47.210 align:start position:0%
chain and turn is one basically into a
well<00:20:45.660><c> you</c><00:20:45.900><c> would</c><00:20:46.020><c> say</c><00:20:46.140><c> you</c><00:20:46.740><c> could</c><00:20:46.860><c> say</c><00:20:46.980><c> a</c><00:20:47.160><c> roll</c>

00:20:47.210 --> 00:20:47.220 align:start position:0%
well you would say you could say a roll
 

00:20:47.220 --> 00:20:49.070 align:start position:0%
well you would say you could say a roll
up<00:20:47.460><c> right</c><00:20:47.580><c> so</c><00:20:47.760><c> in</c><00:20:48.000><c> this</c><00:20:48.120><c> case</c><00:20:48.240><c> if</c><00:20:48.660><c> you</c><00:20:48.720><c> if</c><00:20:48.960><c> you</c>

00:20:49.070 --> 00:20:49.080 align:start position:0%
up right so in this case if you if you
 

00:20:49.080 --> 00:20:50.450 align:start position:0%
up right so in this case if you if you
look<00:20:49.140><c> at</c><00:20:49.260><c> that</c><00:20:49.380><c> picture</c><00:20:49.559><c> you</c><00:20:50.220><c> could</c><00:20:50.280><c> just</c>

00:20:50.450 --> 00:20:50.460 align:start position:0%
look at that picture you could just
 

00:20:50.460 --> 00:20:51.950 align:start position:0%
look at that picture you could just
think<00:20:50.700><c> of</c><00:20:50.880><c> you</c><00:20:51.120><c> know</c><00:20:51.179><c> like</c><00:20:51.360><c> one</c><00:20:51.539><c> of</c><00:20:51.660><c> those</c><00:20:51.780><c> roll</c>

00:20:51.950 --> 00:20:51.960 align:start position:0%
think of you know like one of those roll
 

00:20:51.960 --> 00:20:54.470 align:start position:0%
think of you know like one of those roll
ups<00:20:52.320><c> being</c><00:20:52.440><c> it</c><00:20:52.740><c> one</c><00:20:52.980><c> so</c><00:20:53.220><c> that's</c><00:20:53.520><c> again</c><00:20:54.179><c> I</c><00:20:54.360><c> don't</c>

00:20:54.470 --> 00:20:54.480 align:start position:0%
ups being it one so that's again I don't
 

00:20:54.480 --> 00:20:55.789 align:start position:0%
ups being it one so that's again I don't
I<00:20:54.660><c> don't</c><00:20:54.780><c> think</c><00:20:54.900><c> that's</c><00:20:55.080><c> likely</c><00:20:55.440><c> that</c><00:20:55.620><c> that</c>

00:20:55.789 --> 00:20:55.799 align:start position:0%
I don't think that's likely that that
 

00:20:55.799 --> 00:20:58.250 align:start position:0%
I don't think that's likely that that
we'll<00:20:56.039><c> go</c><00:20:56.280><c> that</c><00:20:56.400><c> way</c><00:20:56.580><c> but</c><00:20:56.880><c> you</c><00:20:57.419><c> know</c><00:20:57.539><c> it</c><00:20:58.140><c> would</c>

00:20:58.250 --> 00:20:58.260 align:start position:0%
we'll go that way but you know it would
 

00:20:58.260 --> 00:21:00.350 align:start position:0%
we'll go that way but you know it would
be<00:20:58.440><c> almost</c><00:20:58.980><c> I</c><00:20:59.280><c> don't</c><00:20:59.580><c> want</c><00:20:59.700><c> to</c><00:20:59.760><c> say</c><00:20:59.880><c> trivially</c>

00:21:00.350 --> 00:21:00.360 align:start position:0%
be almost I don't want to say trivially
 

00:21:00.360 --> 00:21:02.930 align:start position:0%
be almost I don't want to say trivially
but<00:21:00.600><c> it</c><00:21:00.900><c> would</c><00:21:01.020><c> be</c><00:21:01.200><c> very</c><00:21:01.799><c> feasible</c><00:21:02.220><c> to</c><00:21:02.460><c> to</c><00:21:02.580><c> go</c>

00:21:02.930 --> 00:21:02.940 align:start position:0%
but it would be very feasible to to go
 

00:21:02.940 --> 00:21:04.909 align:start position:0%
but it would be very feasible to to go
that<00:21:03.059><c> route</c><00:21:03.240><c> because</c><00:21:03.539><c> we</c><00:21:03.780><c> now</c><00:21:03.960><c> live</c><00:21:04.679><c> in</c><00:21:04.799><c> this</c>

00:21:04.909 --> 00:21:04.919 align:start position:0%
that route because we now live in this
 

00:21:04.919 --> 00:21:07.909 align:start position:0%
that route because we now live in this
in<00:21:05.100><c> this</c><00:21:05.280><c> in</c><00:21:05.520><c> this</c><00:21:05.700><c> modular</c><00:21:06.480><c> World</c>

00:21:07.909 --> 00:21:07.919 align:start position:0%
in this in this modular World
 

00:21:07.919 --> 00:21:10.730 align:start position:0%
in this in this modular World
um<00:21:08.039><c> the</c><00:21:08.880><c> other</c><00:21:09.059><c> one</c><00:21:09.539><c> I</c><00:21:09.840><c> briefly</c><00:21:10.440><c> want</c><00:21:10.559><c> to</c><00:21:10.620><c> talk</c>

00:21:10.730 --> 00:21:10.740 align:start position:0%
um the other one I briefly want to talk
 

00:21:10.740 --> 00:21:14.990 align:start position:0%
um the other one I briefly want to talk
about<00:21:10.799><c> was</c><00:21:11.100><c> the</c><00:21:11.340><c> the</c><00:21:11.460><c> future</c><00:21:11.880><c> of</c><00:21:12.120><c> the</c><00:21:12.240><c> evm</c><00:21:13.200><c> so</c>

00:21:14.990 --> 00:21:15.000 align:start position:0%
about was the the future of the evm so
 

00:21:15.000 --> 00:21:18.350 align:start position:0%
about was the the future of the evm so
um<00:21:15.179><c> first</c><00:21:16.020><c> I</c><00:21:16.500><c> I</c><00:21:16.740><c> do</c><00:21:16.980><c> want</c><00:21:17.100><c> to</c><00:21:17.220><c> say</c><00:21:17.400><c> is</c><00:21:17.700><c> by</c><00:21:18.179><c> no</c>

00:21:18.350 --> 00:21:18.360 align:start position:0%
um first I I do want to say is by no
 

00:21:18.360 --> 00:21:20.510 align:start position:0%
um first I I do want to say is by no
means<00:21:18.660><c> certain</c><00:21:18.900><c> that</c><00:21:19.440><c> kind</c><00:21:19.799><c> of</c><00:21:19.919><c> the</c><00:21:20.039><c> future</c><00:21:20.280><c> of</c>

00:21:20.510 --> 00:21:20.520 align:start position:0%
means certain that kind of the future of
 

00:21:20.520 --> 00:21:22.130 align:start position:0%
means certain that kind of the future of
high<00:21:20.640><c> throughput</c><00:21:21.120><c> execution</c><00:21:21.480><c> chains</c><00:21:21.900><c> will</c><00:21:22.020><c> be</c>

00:21:22.130 --> 00:21:22.140 align:start position:0%
high throughput execution chains will be
 

00:21:22.140 --> 00:21:25.010 align:start position:0%
high throughput execution chains will be
VM<00:21:22.440><c> based</c><00:21:22.860><c> right</c><00:21:23.039><c> I</c><00:21:23.880><c> think</c><00:21:24.059><c> ethereum</c><00:21:24.600><c> as</c><00:21:24.840><c> the</c>

00:21:25.010 --> 00:21:25.020 align:start position:0%
VM based right I think ethereum as the
 

00:21:25.020 --> 00:21:27.350 align:start position:0%
VM based right I think ethereum as the
settlement<00:21:25.380><c> layer</c><00:21:25.740><c> will</c><00:21:25.919><c> will</c><00:21:26.340><c> always</c><00:21:26.700><c> use</c>

00:21:27.350 --> 00:21:27.360 align:start position:0%
settlement layer will will always use
 

00:21:27.360 --> 00:21:30.409 align:start position:0%
settlement layer will will always use
the<00:21:27.600><c> evm</c><00:21:27.960><c> I</c><00:21:28.559><c> think</c><00:21:28.679><c> it's</c><00:21:28.860><c> just</c><00:21:29.220><c> good</c><00:21:29.400><c> enough</c><00:21:29.640><c> uh</c>

00:21:30.409 --> 00:21:30.419 align:start position:0%
the evm I think it's just good enough uh
 

00:21:30.419 --> 00:21:33.890 align:start position:0%
the evm I think it's just good enough uh
for<00:21:30.600><c> for</c><00:21:30.900><c> that</c><00:21:31.260><c> and</c><00:21:32.640><c> but</c><00:21:33.240><c> it's</c><00:21:33.360><c> it's</c><00:21:33.539><c> not</c><00:21:33.780><c> not</c>

00:21:33.890 --> 00:21:33.900 align:start position:0%
for for that and but it's it's not not
 

00:21:33.900 --> 00:21:35.510 align:start position:0%
for for that and but it's it's not not
yet<00:21:34.140><c> decided</c><00:21:34.559><c> like</c><00:21:34.679><c> it</c><00:21:34.860><c> could</c><00:21:34.980><c> be</c><00:21:35.100><c> that</c><00:21:35.340><c> you</c>

00:21:35.510 --> 00:21:35.520 align:start position:0%
yet decided like it could be that you
 

00:21:35.520 --> 00:21:37.130 align:start position:0%
yet decided like it could be that you
know<00:21:35.640><c> I</c><00:21:35.880><c> don't</c><00:21:36.059><c> know</c><00:21:36.120><c> Solana</c><00:21:36.720><c> or</c><00:21:36.960><c> something</c>

00:21:37.130 --> 00:21:37.140 align:start position:0%
know I don't know Solana or something
 

00:21:37.140 --> 00:21:40.490 align:start position:0%
know I don't know Solana or something
has<00:21:37.440><c> the</c><00:21:37.679><c> Deep</c><00:21:37.919><c> dominant</c><00:21:38.460><c> uh</c><00:21:38.820><c> winning</c><00:21:39.500><c> highly</c>

00:21:40.490 --> 00:21:40.500 align:start position:0%
has the Deep dominant uh winning highly
 

00:21:40.500 --> 00:21:43.549 align:start position:0%
has the Deep dominant uh winning highly
scalable<00:21:40.919><c> uh</c><00:21:41.340><c> VM</c><00:21:42.059><c> um</c><00:21:42.120><c> uh</c><00:21:42.900><c> solution</c><00:21:43.200><c> it</c><00:21:43.440><c> could</c>

00:21:43.549 --> 00:21:43.559 align:start position:0%
scalable uh VM um uh solution it could
 

00:21:43.559 --> 00:21:45.289 align:start position:0%
scalable uh VM um uh solution it could
could<00:21:43.740><c> be</c><00:21:43.980><c> could</c><00:21:44.220><c> be</c><00:21:44.400><c> the</c><00:21:44.460><c> evm</c><00:21:44.820><c> it</c><00:21:45.000><c> could</c><00:21:45.120><c> be</c>

00:21:45.289 --> 00:21:45.299 align:start position:0%
could be could be the evm it could be
 

00:21:45.299 --> 00:21:47.390 align:start position:0%
could be could be the evm it could be
some<00:21:45.480><c> some</c><00:21:45.659><c> of</c><00:21:45.840><c> these</c><00:21:46.080><c> other</c><00:21:46.200><c> competing</c><00:21:47.280><c> um</c>

00:21:47.390 --> 00:21:47.400 align:start position:0%
some some of these other competing um
 

00:21:47.400 --> 00:21:50.029 align:start position:0%
some some of these other competing um
new<00:21:47.880><c> ones</c><00:21:48.240><c> this</c><00:21:49.020><c> is</c><00:21:49.080><c> yet</c><00:21:49.260><c> to</c><00:21:49.440><c> be</c><00:21:49.500><c> seen</c><00:21:49.679><c> I</c><00:21:49.919><c> mean</c>

00:21:50.029 --> 00:21:50.039 align:start position:0%
new ones this is yet to be seen I mean
 

00:21:50.039 --> 00:21:53.029 align:start position:0%
new ones this is yet to be seen I mean
we<00:21:50.520><c> are</c><00:21:51.120><c> very</c><00:21:51.299><c> optimistic</c><00:21:51.780><c> for</c><00:21:51.960><c> the</c><00:21:52.080><c> evm</c><00:21:52.440><c> in</c><00:21:52.860><c> in</c>

00:21:53.029 --> 00:21:53.039 align:start position:0%
we are very optimistic for the evm in in
 

00:21:53.039 --> 00:21:55.190 align:start position:0%
we are very optimistic for the evm in in
in<00:21:53.220><c> that</c><00:21:54.120><c> um</c><00:21:54.179><c> scenario</c><00:21:54.659><c> as</c><00:21:54.720><c> well</c><00:21:54.780><c> and</c><00:21:54.960><c> I</c><00:21:55.080><c> think</c>

00:21:55.190 --> 00:21:55.200 align:start position:0%
in that um scenario as well and I think
 

00:21:55.200 --> 00:21:56.750 align:start position:0%
in that um scenario as well and I think
I<00:21:55.500><c> do</c><00:21:55.620><c> want</c><00:21:55.799><c> to</c><00:21:55.919><c> point</c><00:21:56.039><c> out</c>

00:21:56.750 --> 00:21:56.760 align:start position:0%
I do want to point out
 

00:21:56.760 --> 00:21:58.370 align:start position:0%
I do want to point out
um because<00:21:57.179><c> that</c><00:21:57.480><c> sometimes</c><00:21:57.780><c> misunderstood</c>

00:21:58.370 --> 00:21:58.380 align:start position:0%
um because that sometimes misunderstood
 

00:21:58.380 --> 00:22:02.210 align:start position:0%
um because that sometimes misunderstood
uh<00:21:59.220><c> the</c><00:21:59.520><c> the</c><00:21:59.760><c> reason</c><00:22:00.120><c> why</c><00:22:00.900><c> ethereum</c><00:22:01.559><c> only</c><00:22:01.980><c> has</c>

00:22:02.210 --> 00:22:02.220 align:start position:0%
uh the the reason why ethereum only has
 

00:22:02.220 --> 00:22:05.390 align:start position:0%
uh the the reason why ethereum only has
the<00:22:02.460><c> limited</c><00:22:02.760><c> to</c><00:22:02.880><c> put</c><00:22:03.120><c> it</c><00:22:03.240><c> has</c><00:22:03.480><c> is</c><00:22:04.200><c> not</c><00:22:04.559><c> the</c><00:22:04.980><c> evm</c>

00:22:05.390 --> 00:22:05.400 align:start position:0%
the limited to put it has is not the evm
 

00:22:05.400 --> 00:22:06.830 align:start position:0%
the limited to put it has is not the evm
that's<00:22:05.580><c> not</c><00:22:05.760><c> the</c><00:22:05.940><c> limiting</c><00:22:06.480><c> factor</c><00:22:06.720><c> it's</c>

00:22:06.830 --> 00:22:06.840 align:start position:0%
that's not the limiting factor it's
 

00:22:06.840 --> 00:22:08.570 align:start position:0%
that's not the limiting factor it's
really<00:22:07.080><c> that</c><00:22:07.260><c> we</c><00:22:07.440><c> want</c><00:22:07.620><c> to</c><00:22:07.740><c> keep</c><00:22:07.980><c> the</c><00:22:08.220><c> resource</c>

00:22:08.570 --> 00:22:08.580 align:start position:0%
really that we want to keep the resource
 

00:22:08.580 --> 00:22:10.549 align:start position:0%
really that we want to keep the resource
requirements<00:22:09.000><c> for</c><00:22:09.179><c> validators</c><00:22:09.780><c> low</c><00:22:10.020><c> the</c><00:22:10.440><c> mom</c>

00:22:10.549 --> 00:22:10.559 align:start position:0%
requirements for validators low the mom
 

00:22:10.559 --> 00:22:12.649 align:start position:0%
requirements for validators low the mom
the<00:22:10.919><c> moment</c><00:22:11.100><c> you</c><00:22:11.280><c> are</c><00:22:11.400><c> a</c><00:22:11.520><c> roll</c><00:22:11.640><c> up</c><00:22:11.940><c> and</c><00:22:12.539><c> you</c>

00:22:12.649 --> 00:22:12.659 align:start position:0%
the moment you are a roll up and you
 

00:22:12.659 --> 00:22:14.690 align:start position:0%
the moment you are a roll up and you
adopt<00:22:13.080><c> the</c><00:22:13.140><c> evm</c><00:22:13.559><c> you</c><00:22:13.919><c> can</c><00:22:14.039><c> still</c><00:22:14.220><c> go</c><00:22:14.460><c> far</c>

00:22:14.690 --> 00:22:14.700 align:start position:0%
adopt the evm you can still go far
 

00:22:14.700 --> 00:22:16.970 align:start position:0%
adopt the evm you can still go far
beyond<00:22:15.059><c> the</c><00:22:15.240><c> throughput</c><00:22:15.720><c> constraints</c><00:22:16.620><c> of</c><00:22:16.860><c> the</c>

00:22:16.970 --> 00:22:16.980 align:start position:0%
beyond the throughput constraints of the
 

00:22:16.980 --> 00:22:18.950 align:start position:0%
beyond the throughput constraints of the
base<00:22:17.100><c> layer</c><00:22:17.520><c> and</c><00:22:18.059><c> so</c><00:22:18.240><c> and</c><00:22:18.419><c> there</c><00:22:18.720><c> are</c><00:22:18.840><c> many</c>

00:22:18.950 --> 00:22:18.960 align:start position:0%
base layer and so and there are many
 

00:22:18.960 --> 00:22:20.690 align:start position:0%
base layer and so and there are many
possible<00:22:19.320><c> evm</c><00:22:19.919><c> improvements</c><00:22:20.280><c> that</c><00:22:20.400><c> we</c><00:22:20.580><c> just</c>

00:22:20.690 --> 00:22:20.700 align:start position:0%
possible evm improvements that we just
 

00:22:20.700 --> 00:22:22.970 align:start position:0%
possible evm improvements that we just
never<00:22:20.880><c> bothered</c><00:22:21.480><c> to</c><00:22:21.600><c> do</c><00:22:21.780><c> on</c><00:22:22.440><c> the</c><00:22:22.559><c> base</c><00:22:22.679><c> layer</c>

00:22:22.970 --> 00:22:22.980 align:start position:0%
never bothered to do on the base layer
 

00:22:22.980 --> 00:22:24.649 align:start position:0%
never bothered to do on the base layer
because<00:22:23.100><c> the</c><00:22:23.400><c> data</c><00:22:23.760><c> is</c><00:22:23.820><c> not</c><00:22:23.940><c> relevant</c><00:22:24.299><c> for</c><00:22:24.480><c> us</c>

00:22:24.649 --> 00:22:24.659 align:start position:0%
because the data is not relevant for us
 

00:22:24.659 --> 00:22:26.810 align:start position:0%
because the data is not relevant for us
but<00:22:25.200><c> that</c><00:22:25.380><c> layer</c><00:22:25.679><c> twos</c><00:22:26.039><c> are</c><00:22:26.220><c> very</c><00:22:26.460><c> actively</c>

00:22:26.810 --> 00:22:26.820 align:start position:0%
but that layer twos are very actively
 

00:22:26.820 --> 00:22:28.370 align:start position:0%
but that layer twos are very actively
looking<00:22:27.000><c> into</c><00:22:27.240><c> it</c><00:22:27.419><c> so</c><00:22:27.600><c> I</c><00:22:27.840><c> think</c><00:22:27.960><c> there's</c><00:22:28.140><c> a</c>

00:22:28.370 --> 00:22:28.380 align:start position:0%
looking into it so I think there's a
 

00:22:28.380 --> 00:22:30.169 align:start position:0%
looking into it so I think there's a
very<00:22:28.440><c> good</c><00:22:28.679><c> chance</c><00:22:28.919><c> that</c><00:22:29.220><c> the</c><00:22:29.400><c> evm</c><00:22:29.760><c> will</c><00:22:30.000><c> turn</c>

00:22:30.169 --> 00:22:30.179 align:start position:0%
very good chance that the evm will turn
 

00:22:30.179 --> 00:22:32.450 align:start position:0%
very good chance that the evm will turn
out<00:22:30.360><c> to</c><00:22:30.480><c> be</c><00:22:30.780><c> to</c><00:22:31.020><c> be</c><00:22:31.200><c> like</c><00:22:31.440><c> the</c><00:22:31.919><c> winning</c><00:22:32.159><c> or</c><00:22:32.340><c> one</c>

00:22:32.450 --> 00:22:32.460 align:start position:0%
out to be to be like the winning or one
 

00:22:32.460 --> 00:22:36.950 align:start position:0%
out to be to be like the winning or one
of<00:22:32.520><c> the</c><00:22:32.580><c> evening</c><00:22:33.120><c> and</c><00:22:33.780><c> height</c><00:22:34.559><c> throughput</c><00:22:35.039><c> VMS</c>

00:22:36.950 --> 00:22:36.960 align:start position:0%
of the evening and height throughput VMS
 

00:22:36.960 --> 00:22:40.010 align:start position:0%
of the evening and height throughput VMS
um<00:22:37.080><c> yeah</c><00:22:37.799><c> and</c><00:22:38.039><c> and</c><00:22:38.220><c> but</c><00:22:38.760><c> but</c><00:22:38.940><c> of</c><00:22:39.240><c> course</c><00:22:39.419><c> uh</c>

00:22:40.010 --> 00:22:40.020 align:start position:0%
um yeah and and but but of course uh
 

00:22:40.020 --> 00:22:42.770 align:start position:0%
um yeah and and but but of course uh
whether<00:22:40.260><c> like</c><00:22:40.620><c> like</c><00:22:40.799><c> the</c><00:22:41.520><c> the</c><00:22:41.760><c> outcome</c><00:22:42.059><c> of</c><00:22:42.240><c> all</c>

00:22:42.770 --> 00:22:42.780 align:start position:0%
whether like like the the outcome of all
 

00:22:42.780 --> 00:22:44.690 align:start position:0%
whether like like the the outcome of all
of<00:22:42.900><c> this</c><00:22:43.080><c> process</c><00:22:43.559><c> will</c><00:22:44.100><c> have</c><00:22:44.280><c> like</c><00:22:44.460><c> big</c>

00:22:44.690 --> 00:22:44.700 align:start position:0%
of this process will have like big
 

00:22:44.700 --> 00:22:47.510 align:start position:0%
of this process will have like big
implications<00:22:45.600><c> that</c><00:22:46.080><c> clients</c><00:22:46.559><c> will</c><00:22:47.039><c> clients</c>

00:22:47.510 --> 00:22:47.520 align:start position:0%
implications that clients will clients
 

00:22:47.520 --> 00:22:49.730 align:start position:0%
implications that clients will clients
basically<00:22:47.880><c> say</c><00:22:48.360><c> the</c><00:22:48.600><c> existing</c><00:22:48.900><c> evm</c><00:22:49.440><c> clients</c>

00:22:49.730 --> 00:22:49.740 align:start position:0%
basically say the existing evm clients
 

00:22:49.740 --> 00:22:50.930 align:start position:0%
basically say the existing evm clients
will<00:22:49.860><c> they</c><00:22:50.039><c> be</c><00:22:50.159><c> primarily</c><00:22:50.580><c> settlement</c>

00:22:50.930 --> 00:22:50.940 align:start position:0%
will they be primarily settlement
 

00:22:50.940 --> 00:22:52.970 align:start position:0%
will they be primarily settlement
clients<00:22:51.360><c> only</c><00:22:51.900><c> or</c><00:22:52.260><c> will</c><00:22:52.380><c> they</c><00:22:52.559><c> also</c><00:22:52.799><c> be</c><00:22:52.860><c> used</c>

00:22:52.970 --> 00:22:52.980 align:start position:0%
clients only or will they also be used
 

00:22:52.980 --> 00:22:54.950 align:start position:0%
clients only or will they also be used
for<00:22:53.220><c> Roll-Ups</c><00:22:53.760><c> at</c><00:22:54.179><c> some</c><00:22:54.299><c> point</c><00:22:54.419><c> maybe</c><00:22:54.600><c> they'll</c>

00:22:54.950 --> 00:22:54.960 align:start position:0%
for Roll-Ups at some point maybe they'll
 

00:22:54.960 --> 00:22:57.049 align:start position:0%
for Roll-Ups at some point maybe they'll
want<00:22:55.140><c> to</c><00:22:55.260><c> focus</c><00:22:55.440><c> on</c><00:22:55.620><c> Roll-Ups</c><00:22:56.100><c> even</c>

00:22:57.049 --> 00:22:57.059 align:start position:0%
want to focus on Roll-Ups even
 

00:22:57.059 --> 00:22:58.310 align:start position:0%
want to focus on Roll-Ups even
um<00:22:57.179><c> how</c><00:22:57.419><c> does</c><00:22:57.659><c> that</c><00:22:57.840><c> look</c><00:22:58.020><c> like</c><00:22:58.140><c> for</c>

00:22:58.310 --> 00:22:58.320 align:start position:0%
um how does that look like for
 

00:22:58.320 --> 00:23:00.649 align:start position:0%
um how does that look like for
programming<00:22:58.919><c> languages</c><00:22:59.159><c> for</c><00:22:59.460><c> the</c><00:22:59.580><c> evm</c><00:23:00.000><c> uh</c>

00:23:00.649 --> 00:23:00.659 align:start position:0%
programming languages for the evm uh
 

00:23:00.659 --> 00:23:01.970 align:start position:0%
programming languages for the evm uh
whatever<00:23:01.020><c> tooling</c><00:23:01.500><c> all</c><00:23:01.620><c> these</c><00:23:01.799><c> kind</c><00:23:01.919><c> of</c>

00:23:01.970 --> 00:23:01.980 align:start position:0%
whatever tooling all these kind of
 

00:23:01.980 --> 00:23:03.230 align:start position:0%
whatever tooling all these kind of
things<00:23:02.100><c> right</c>

00:23:03.230 --> 00:23:03.240 align:start position:0%
things right
 

00:23:03.240 --> 00:23:04.370 align:start position:0%
things right
um so<00:23:03.419><c> I</c><00:23:03.539><c> think</c><00:23:03.659><c> this</c><00:23:03.780><c> is</c><00:23:03.960><c> this</c><00:23:04.140><c> is</c><00:23:04.260><c> going</c><00:23:04.320><c> to</c>

00:23:04.370 --> 00:23:04.380 align:start position:0%
um so I think this is this is going to
 

00:23:04.380 --> 00:23:06.649 align:start position:0%
um so I think this is this is going to
be<00:23:04.440><c> like</c><00:23:04.559><c> one</c><00:23:04.799><c> of</c><00:23:04.919><c> the</c><00:23:05.100><c> the</c><00:23:05.340><c> main</c><00:23:05.760><c> interesting</c>

00:23:06.649 --> 00:23:06.659 align:start position:0%
be like one of the the main interesting
 

00:23:06.659 --> 00:23:09.049 align:start position:0%
be like one of the the main interesting
kind<00:23:06.960><c> of</c><00:23:07.080><c> technological</c><00:23:07.980><c> debates</c><00:23:08.700><c> of</c><00:23:08.940><c> the</c>

00:23:09.049 --> 00:23:09.059 align:start position:0%
kind of technological debates of the
 

00:23:09.059 --> 00:23:10.669 align:start position:0%
kind of technological debates of the
next<00:23:09.179><c> five</c><00:23:09.419><c> years</c>

00:23:10.669 --> 00:23:10.679 align:start position:0%
next five years
 

00:23:10.679 --> 00:23:12.350 align:start position:0%
next five years
um and<00:23:11.039><c> in</c><00:23:11.100><c> particular</c><00:23:11.460><c> I</c><00:23:11.580><c> wanted</c><00:23:11.760><c> to</c><00:23:11.940><c> briefly</c>

00:23:12.350 --> 00:23:12.360 align:start position:0%
um and in particular I wanted to briefly
 

00:23:12.360 --> 00:23:14.810 align:start position:0%
um and in particular I wanted to briefly
very<00:23:13.320><c> briefly</c><00:23:13.620><c> talk</c><00:23:13.860><c> about</c><00:23:13.919><c> evm</c><00:23:14.340><c> equivalents</c>

00:23:14.810 --> 00:23:14.820 align:start position:0%
very briefly talk about evm equivalents
 

00:23:14.820 --> 00:23:16.310 align:start position:0%
very briefly talk about evm equivalents
because<00:23:14.880><c> that's</c><00:23:15.059><c> just</c><00:23:15.240><c> a</c><00:23:15.419><c> topic</c><00:23:15.720><c> that</c><00:23:15.960><c> I</c><00:23:16.140><c> I</c>

00:23:16.310 --> 00:23:16.320 align:start position:0%
because that's just a topic that I I
 

00:23:16.320 --> 00:23:18.649 align:start position:0%
because that's just a topic that I I
personally<00:23:16.679><c> am</c><00:23:16.860><c> really</c><00:23:17.460><c> interested</c><00:23:17.760><c> in</c><00:23:17.940><c> so</c>

00:23:18.649 --> 00:23:18.659 align:start position:0%
personally am really interested in so
 

00:23:18.659 --> 00:23:21.350 align:start position:0%
personally am really interested in so
for<00:23:19.559><c> these</c><00:23:19.980><c> layer</c><00:23:20.400><c> two</c><00:23:20.520><c> layer</c><00:23:20.880><c> Twos</c><00:23:21.120><c> for</c><00:23:21.240><c> these</c>

00:23:21.350 --> 00:23:21.360 align:start position:0%
for these layer two layer Twos for these
 

00:23:21.360 --> 00:23:23.409 align:start position:0%
for these layer two layer Twos for these
Roll-Ups<00:23:21.840><c> that</c><00:23:22.020><c> choose</c><00:23:22.320><c> to</c><00:23:22.500><c> go</c><00:23:22.620><c> with</c><00:23:22.799><c> the</c><00:23:22.919><c> evm</c>

00:23:23.409 --> 00:23:23.419 align:start position:0%
Roll-Ups that choose to go with the evm
 

00:23:23.419 --> 00:23:27.230 align:start position:0%
Roll-Ups that choose to go with the evm
and<00:23:24.419><c> the</c><00:23:25.260><c> question</c><00:23:25.380><c> is</c><00:23:25.679><c> do</c><00:23:26.340><c> they</c><00:23:26.520><c> go</c><00:23:26.700><c> with</c><00:23:26.940><c> the</c>

00:23:27.230 --> 00:23:27.240 align:start position:0%
and the question is do they go with the
 

00:23:27.240 --> 00:23:29.510 align:start position:0%
and the question is do they go with the
the<00:23:27.600><c> the</c><00:23:27.720><c> exact</c><00:23:28.380><c> evm</c><00:23:28.799><c> or</c><00:23:28.919><c> do</c><00:23:29.100><c> they</c><00:23:29.220><c> just</c><00:23:29.340><c> go</c>

00:23:29.510 --> 00:23:29.520 align:start position:0%
the the exact evm or do they just go
 

00:23:29.520 --> 00:23:31.190 align:start position:0%
the the exact evm or do they just go
with<00:23:29.700><c> something</c><00:23:29.940><c> that</c><00:23:30.240><c> looks</c><00:23:30.659><c> kind</c><00:23:30.900><c> of</c><00:23:31.020><c> like</c>

00:23:31.190 --> 00:23:31.200 align:start position:0%
with something that looks kind of like
 

00:23:31.200 --> 00:23:33.049 align:start position:0%
with something that looks kind of like
pvm<00:23:31.740><c> right</c><00:23:31.919><c> and</c><00:23:32.100><c> if</c><00:23:32.340><c> you</c><00:23:32.460><c> remember</c><00:23:32.640><c> say</c>

00:23:33.049 --> 00:23:33.059 align:start position:0%
pvm right and if you remember say
 

00:23:33.059 --> 00:23:34.730 align:start position:0%
pvm right and if you remember say
optimism<00:23:33.539><c> for</c><00:23:33.780><c> example</c><00:23:34.020><c> they</c><00:23:34.260><c> started</c><00:23:34.559><c> out</c>

00:23:34.730 --> 00:23:34.740 align:start position:0%
optimism for example they started out
 

00:23:34.740 --> 00:23:36.789 align:start position:0%
optimism for example they started out
with<00:23:34.980><c> what</c><00:23:35.159><c> they</c><00:23:35.220><c> call</c><00:23:35.400><c> the</c><00:23:35.700><c> Optimus</c>

00:23:36.789 --> 00:23:36.799 align:start position:0%
with what they call the Optimus
 

00:23:36.799 --> 00:23:38.630 align:start position:0%
with what they call the Optimus
optimism<00:23:37.799><c> virtual</c><00:23:38.100><c> machine</c><00:23:38.280><c> or</c><00:23:38.460><c> something</c>

00:23:38.630 --> 00:23:38.640 align:start position:0%
optimism virtual machine or something
 

00:23:38.640 --> 00:23:40.789 align:start position:0%
optimism virtual machine or something
OBM<00:23:39.240><c> which</c><00:23:39.600><c> was</c><00:23:39.780><c> basically</c><00:23:40.080><c> an</c><00:23:40.260><c> Adaptive</c>

00:23:40.789 --> 00:23:40.799 align:start position:0%
OBM which was basically an Adaptive
 

00:23:40.799 --> 00:23:42.230 align:start position:0%
OBM which was basically an Adaptive
version<00:23:40.980><c> of</c><00:23:41.159><c> the</c><00:23:41.220><c> evm</c><00:23:41.580><c> and</c><00:23:41.700><c> now</c><00:23:41.820><c> they're</c><00:23:42.000><c> back</c>

00:23:42.230 --> 00:23:42.240 align:start position:0%
version of the evm and now they're back
 

00:23:42.240 --> 00:23:44.510 align:start position:0%
version of the evm and now they're back
at<00:23:42.360><c> using</c><00:23:42.720><c> basically</c><00:23:43.020><c> the</c><00:23:43.500><c> EVMS</c><00:23:43.980><c> is</c><00:23:44.159><c> so</c><00:23:44.400><c> the</c>

00:23:44.510 --> 00:23:44.520 align:start position:0%
at using basically the EVMS is so the
 

00:23:44.520 --> 00:23:47.149 align:start position:0%
at using basically the EVMS is so the
question<00:23:44.700><c> is</c><00:23:44.940><c> in</c><00:23:45.600><c> the</c><00:23:45.780><c> long</c><00:23:45.900><c> run</c><00:23:46.080><c> what</c><00:23:46.799><c> what</c><00:23:46.980><c> is</c>

00:23:47.149 --> 00:23:47.159 align:start position:0%
question is in the long run what what is
 

00:23:47.159 --> 00:23:48.529 align:start position:0%
question is in the long run what what is
the<00:23:47.220><c> way</c><00:23:47.340><c> to</c><00:23:47.460><c> go</c><00:23:47.580><c> should</c><00:23:47.820><c> you</c><00:23:47.940><c> go</c><00:23:48.059><c> with</c><00:23:48.179><c> evm</c>

00:23:48.529 --> 00:23:48.539 align:start position:0%
the way to go should you go with evm
 

00:23:48.539 --> 00:23:50.390 align:start position:0%
the way to go should you go with evm
equivalents<00:23:49.020><c> or</c><00:23:49.140><c> not</c><00:23:49.260><c> and</c><00:23:49.679><c> so</c><00:23:49.799><c> just</c><00:23:50.100><c> briefly</c>

00:23:50.390 --> 00:23:50.400 align:start position:0%
equivalents or not and so just briefly
 

00:23:50.400 --> 00:23:52.549 align:start position:0%
equivalents or not and so just briefly
basically<00:23:50.700><c> the</c><00:23:50.880><c> pros</c><00:23:51.419><c> that</c><00:23:51.539><c> I</c><00:23:51.720><c> see</c><00:23:51.900><c> would</c><00:23:52.440><c> be</c>

00:23:52.549 --> 00:23:52.559 align:start position:0%
basically the pros that I see would be
 

00:23:52.559 --> 00:23:53.450 align:start position:0%
basically the pros that I see would be
of<00:23:52.740><c> course</c>

00:23:53.450 --> 00:23:53.460 align:start position:0%
of course
 

00:23:53.460 --> 00:23:56.090 align:start position:0%
of course
um<00:23:53.520><c> standardization</c><00:23:54.240><c> right</c><00:23:54.600><c> like</c><00:23:54.900><c> if</c><00:23:55.260><c> if</c><00:23:55.559><c> you</c>

00:23:56.090 --> 00:23:56.100 align:start position:0%
um standardization right like if if you
 

00:23:56.100 --> 00:23:57.649 align:start position:0%
um standardization right like if if you
use<00:23:56.220><c> the</c><00:23:56.340><c> evm</c><00:23:56.640><c> just</c><00:23:56.820><c> all</c><00:23:57.059><c> the</c><00:23:57.179><c> tooling</c><00:23:57.419><c> works</c>

00:23:57.649 --> 00:23:57.659 align:start position:0%
use the evm just all the tooling works
 

00:23:57.659 --> 00:23:59.149 align:start position:0%
use the evm just all the tooling works
out<00:23:57.780><c> of</c><00:23:57.900><c> the</c><00:23:57.960><c> box</c><00:23:58.080><c> you</c><00:23:58.679><c> have</c><00:23:58.799><c> multiple</c>

00:23:59.149 --> 00:23:59.159 align:start position:0%
out of the box you have multiple
 

00:23:59.159 --> 00:24:00.890 align:start position:0%
out of the box you have multiple
existing<00:23:59.520><c> client</c><00:23:59.760><c> implementations</c><00:24:00.299><c> which</c>

00:24:00.890 --> 00:24:00.900 align:start position:0%
existing client implementations which
 

00:24:00.900 --> 00:24:02.630 align:start position:0%
existing client implementations which
again<00:24:01.140><c> for</c><00:24:01.440><c> security</c><00:24:01.620><c> having</c><00:24:02.159><c> multiple</c>

00:24:02.630 --> 00:24:02.640 align:start position:0%
again for security having multiple
 

00:24:02.640 --> 00:24:05.630 align:start position:0%
again for security having multiple
clients<00:24:03.000><c> is</c><00:24:03.240><c> just</c><00:24:03.539><c> really</c><00:24:04.020><c> really</c><00:24:04.320><c> uh</c><00:24:05.280><c> helpful</c>

00:24:05.630 --> 00:24:05.640 align:start position:0%
clients is just really really uh helpful
 

00:24:05.640 --> 00:24:07.430 align:start position:0%
clients is just really really uh helpful
but<00:24:06.000><c> also</c><00:24:06.240><c> really</c><00:24:06.419><c> hard</c><00:24:06.600><c> to</c><00:24:06.780><c> achieve</c><00:24:07.080><c> so</c><00:24:07.260><c> this</c>

00:24:07.430 --> 00:24:07.440 align:start position:0%
but also really hard to achieve so this
 

00:24:07.440 --> 00:24:08.870 align:start position:0%
but also really hard to achieve so this
is<00:24:07.559><c> like</c><00:24:07.740><c> a</c><00:24:07.860><c> big</c><00:24:07.980><c> win</c><00:24:08.159><c> you</c><00:24:08.400><c> can</c><00:24:08.520><c> you</c><00:24:08.640><c> can</c><00:24:08.760><c> get</c>

00:24:08.870 --> 00:24:08.880 align:start position:0%
is like a big win you can you can get
 

00:24:08.880 --> 00:24:11.870 align:start position:0%
is like a big win you can you can get
with<00:24:09.059><c> evm</c><00:24:09.480><c> equivalence</c><00:24:09.980><c> and</c><00:24:10.980><c> this</c><00:24:11.640><c> the</c><00:24:11.820><c> the</c>

00:24:11.870 --> 00:24:11.880 align:start position:0%
with evm equivalence and this the the
 

00:24:11.880 --> 00:24:13.370 align:start position:0%
with evm equivalence and this the the
third<00:24:12.179><c> one</c><00:24:12.299><c> is</c><00:24:12.419><c> a</c><00:24:12.539><c> bit</c><00:24:12.600><c> more</c><00:24:12.720><c> speculative</c><00:24:13.080><c> but</c>

00:24:13.370 --> 00:24:13.380 align:start position:0%
third one is a bit more speculative but
 

00:24:13.380 --> 00:24:14.990 align:start position:0%
third one is a bit more speculative but
we<00:24:13.620><c> could</c><00:24:13.799><c> definitely</c><00:24:14.100><c> imagine</c><00:24:14.460><c> in</c><00:24:14.880><c> the</c>

00:24:14.990 --> 00:24:15.000 align:start position:0%
we could definitely imagine in the
 

00:24:15.000 --> 00:24:16.730 align:start position:0%
we could definitely imagine in the
future<00:24:15.120><c> that</c><00:24:15.539><c> we</c><00:24:16.080><c> have</c><00:24:16.200><c> some</c><00:24:16.440><c> sort</c><00:24:16.620><c> of</c>

00:24:16.730 --> 00:24:16.740 align:start position:0%
future that we have some sort of
 

00:24:16.740 --> 00:24:19.250 align:start position:0%
future that we have some sort of
specialized<00:24:17.580><c> settlement</c><00:24:18.260><c> functionality</c>

00:24:19.250 --> 00:24:19.260 align:start position:0%
specialized settlement functionality
 

00:24:19.260 --> 00:24:22.669 align:start position:0%
specialized settlement functionality
around<00:24:19.880><c> evm</c><00:24:20.880><c> that</c><00:24:21.120><c> we</c><00:24:21.419><c> offer</c><00:24:21.600><c> for</c><00:24:21.780><c> Roll-Ups</c><00:24:22.320><c> of</c>

00:24:22.669 --> 00:24:22.679 align:start position:0%
around evm that we offer for Roll-Ups of
 

00:24:22.679 --> 00:24:24.110 align:start position:0%
around evm that we offer for Roll-Ups of
course<00:24:22.740><c> that</c><00:24:22.980><c> would</c><00:24:23.100><c> not</c><00:24:23.220><c> be</c><00:24:23.400><c> mandatory</c><00:24:23.940><c> right</c>

00:24:24.110 --> 00:24:24.120 align:start position:0%
course that would not be mandatory right
 

00:24:24.120 --> 00:24:26.330 align:start position:0%
course that would not be mandatory right
if<00:24:24.360><c> you</c><00:24:24.480><c> want</c><00:24:24.600><c> to</c><00:24:24.720><c> run</c><00:24:24.840><c> your</c><00:24:25.020><c> own</c><00:24:25.200><c> like</c><00:24:25.620><c> fuel</c><00:24:26.100><c> or</c>

00:24:26.330 --> 00:24:26.340 align:start position:0%
if you want to run your own like fuel or
 

00:24:26.340 --> 00:24:27.950 align:start position:0%
if you want to run your own like fuel or
Solana<00:24:26.760><c> or</c><00:24:26.880><c> something</c><00:24:27.059><c> on</c><00:24:27.240><c> top</c><00:24:27.360><c> of</c><00:24:27.480><c> ethereum</c>

00:24:27.950 --> 00:24:27.960 align:start position:0%
Solana or something on top of ethereum
 

00:24:27.960 --> 00:24:29.090 align:start position:0%
Solana or something on top of ethereum
you<00:24:28.140><c> can</c><00:24:28.200><c> do</c><00:24:28.320><c> that</c><00:24:28.440><c> as</c><00:24:28.559><c> well</c><00:24:28.620><c> but</c><00:24:28.799><c> we</c><00:24:28.980><c> would</c>

00:24:29.090 --> 00:24:29.100 align:start position:0%
you can do that as well but we would
 

00:24:29.100 --> 00:24:30.950 align:start position:0%
you can do that as well but we would
have<00:24:29.280><c> special</c><00:24:29.520><c> special</c><00:24:30.120><c> support</c><00:24:30.480><c> for</c><00:24:30.720><c> for</c>

00:24:30.950 --> 00:24:30.960 align:start position:0%
have special special support for for
 

00:24:30.960 --> 00:24:34.370 align:start position:0%
have special special support for for
these<00:24:31.260><c> evm</c><00:24:31.799><c> based</c><00:24:32.159><c> ones</c><00:24:32.659><c> and</c><00:24:33.659><c> one</c><00:24:34.080><c> really</c>

00:24:34.370 --> 00:24:34.380 align:start position:0%
these evm based ones and one really
 

00:24:34.380 --> 00:24:35.570 align:start position:0%
these evm based ones and one really
interesting<00:24:34.679><c> one</c><00:24:34.860><c> especially</c><00:24:35.159><c> I</c><00:24:35.340><c> think</c><00:24:35.460><c> in</c>

00:24:35.570 --> 00:24:35.580 align:start position:0%
interesting one especially I think in
 

00:24:35.580 --> 00:24:37.850 align:start position:0%
interesting one especially I think in
the<00:24:35.700><c> last</c><00:24:35.820><c> few</c><00:24:36.020><c> months</c><00:24:37.020><c> people</c><00:24:37.380><c> have</c><00:24:37.679><c> more</c>

00:24:37.850 --> 00:24:37.860 align:start position:0%
the last few months people have more
 

00:24:37.860 --> 00:24:39.470 align:start position:0%
the last few months people have more
noticed<00:24:38.340><c> how</c><00:24:38.460><c> governments</c><00:24:38.940><c> can</c><00:24:39.059><c> really</c><00:24:39.179><c> be</c><00:24:39.360><c> a</c>

00:24:39.470 --> 00:24:39.480 align:start position:0%
noticed how governments can really be a
 

00:24:39.480 --> 00:24:42.770 align:start position:0%
noticed how governments can really be a
liability<00:24:40.039><c> and</c><00:24:41.039><c> and</c><00:24:41.580><c> if</c><00:24:41.940><c> you</c><00:24:42.120><c> actually</c><00:24:42.299><c> follow</c>

00:24:42.770 --> 00:24:42.780 align:start position:0%
liability and and if you actually follow
 

00:24:42.780 --> 00:24:45.890 align:start position:0%
liability and and if you actually follow
the<00:24:43.020><c> evm</c><00:24:43.500><c> as</c><00:24:44.100><c> is</c><00:24:44.340><c> you</c><00:24:44.940><c> can</c><00:24:45.059><c> just</c><00:24:45.179><c> defer</c><00:24:45.539><c> to</c><00:24:45.659><c> to</c>

00:24:45.890 --> 00:24:45.900 align:start position:0%
the evm as is you can just defer to to
 

00:24:45.900 --> 00:24:48.049 align:start position:0%
the evm as is you can just defer to to
layer<00:24:46.260><c> one</c><00:24:46.860><c> um</c><00:24:46.919><c> governance</c><00:24:47.520><c> and</c><00:24:47.640><c> follow</c><00:24:47.820><c> their</c>

00:24:48.049 --> 00:24:48.059 align:start position:0%
layer one um governance and follow their
 

00:24:48.059 --> 00:24:50.029 align:start position:0%
layer one um governance and follow their
changes<00:24:48.480><c> basically</c><00:24:48.900><c> and</c><00:24:49.380><c> then</c><00:24:49.500><c> what</c><00:24:49.799><c> are</c><00:24:49.980><c> the</c>

00:24:50.029 --> 00:24:50.039 align:start position:0%
changes basically and then what are the
 

00:24:50.039 --> 00:24:51.409 align:start position:0%
changes basically and then what are the
what<00:24:50.220><c> are</c><00:24:50.340><c> the</c><00:24:50.460><c> cons</c>

00:24:51.409 --> 00:24:51.419 align:start position:0%
what are the cons
 

00:24:51.419 --> 00:24:54.590 align:start position:0%
what are the cons
um<00:24:51.840><c> um</c><00:24:52.220><c> why</c><00:24:53.220><c> might</c><00:24:53.400><c> you</c><00:24:53.520><c> not</c><00:24:53.820><c> want</c><00:24:53.940><c> that</c><00:24:54.179><c> well</c>

00:24:54.590 --> 00:24:54.600 align:start position:0%
um um why might you not want that well
 

00:24:54.600 --> 00:24:56.510 align:start position:0%
um um why might you not want that well
of<00:24:54.780><c> course</c><00:24:54.900><c> one</c><00:24:55.140><c> it's</c><00:24:55.500><c> just</c><00:24:55.679><c> like</c><00:24:55.980><c> if</c><00:24:56.159><c> you</c><00:24:56.280><c> if</c>

00:24:56.510 --> 00:24:56.520 align:start position:0%
of course one it's just like if you if
 

00:24:56.520 --> 00:24:58.310 align:start position:0%
of course one it's just like if you if
you're<00:24:56.700><c> if</c><00:24:56.880><c> you're</c><00:24:57.120><c> stuck</c><00:24:57.240><c> with</c><00:24:57.480><c> the</c><00:24:57.840><c> layer</c>

00:24:58.310 --> 00:24:58.320 align:start position:0%
you're if you're stuck with the layer
 

00:24:58.320 --> 00:25:00.890 align:start position:0%
you're if you're stuck with the layer
one<00:24:58.440><c> evm</c><00:24:58.980><c> that</c><00:24:59.760><c> does</c><00:24:59.940><c> come</c><00:25:00.179><c> at</c><00:25:00.360><c> a</c><00:25:00.480><c> cost</c><00:25:00.600><c> of</c>

00:25:00.890 --> 00:25:00.900 align:start position:0%
one evm that does come at a cost of
 

00:25:00.900 --> 00:25:02.810 align:start position:0%
one evm that does come at a cost of
slightly<00:25:01.380><c> slower</c><00:25:01.740><c> iteration</c><00:25:02.159><c> speed</c><00:25:02.400><c> right</c><00:25:02.640><c> we</c>

00:25:02.810 --> 00:25:02.820 align:start position:0%
slightly slower iteration speed right we
 

00:25:02.820 --> 00:25:04.669 align:start position:0%
slightly slower iteration speed right we
have<00:25:03.000><c> to</c><00:25:03.120><c> really</c><00:25:03.480><c> vet</c><00:25:03.840><c> every</c><00:25:04.200><c> change</c><00:25:04.500><c> that</c>

00:25:04.669 --> 00:25:04.679 align:start position:0%
have to really vet every change that
 

00:25:04.679 --> 00:25:07.010 align:start position:0%
have to really vet every change that
goes<00:25:04.919><c> into</c><00:25:04.980><c> the</c><00:25:05.220><c> VM</c><00:25:05.520><c> quite</c><00:25:06.000><c> severely</c><00:25:06.659><c> to</c><00:25:06.900><c> make</c>

00:25:07.010 --> 00:25:07.020 align:start position:0%
goes into the VM quite severely to make
 

00:25:07.020 --> 00:25:09.110 align:start position:0%
goes into the VM quite severely to make
sure<00:25:07.140><c> nothing</c><00:25:07.320><c> ever</c><00:25:07.559><c> breaks</c>

00:25:09.110 --> 00:25:09.120 align:start position:0%
sure nothing ever breaks
 

00:25:09.120 --> 00:25:11.390 align:start position:0%
sure nothing ever breaks
um<00:25:09.240><c> you</c><00:25:10.020><c> might</c><00:25:10.140><c> just</c><00:25:10.500><c> need</c><00:25:10.740><c> some</c><00:25:10.919><c> layer</c><00:25:11.280><c> two</c>

00:25:11.390 --> 00:25:11.400 align:start position:0%
um you might just need some layer two
 

00:25:11.400 --> 00:25:13.250 align:start position:0%
um you might just need some layer two
specific<00:25:11.700><c> functionality</c><00:25:12.179><c> it's</c><00:25:12.419><c> just</c><00:25:12.659><c> harder</c>

00:25:13.250 --> 00:25:13.260 align:start position:0%
specific functionality it's just harder
 

00:25:13.260 --> 00:25:14.450 align:start position:0%
specific functionality it's just harder
to<00:25:13.380><c> add</c><00:25:13.559><c> that</c>

00:25:14.450 --> 00:25:14.460 align:start position:0%
to add that
 

00:25:14.460 --> 00:25:15.770 align:start position:0%
to add that
um<00:25:14.520><c> if</c><00:25:14.820><c> you</c><00:25:14.880><c> really</c><00:25:15.000><c> don't</c><00:25:15.179><c> want</c><00:25:15.360><c> to</c><00:25:15.480><c> you</c><00:25:15.600><c> know</c>

00:25:15.770 --> 00:25:15.780 align:start position:0%
um if you really don't want to you know
 

00:25:15.780 --> 00:25:18.649 align:start position:0%
um if you really don't want to you know
kind<00:25:16.080><c> of</c><00:25:16.200><c> mess</c><00:25:16.320><c> mess</c><00:25:16.559><c> with</c><00:25:16.860><c> with</c><00:25:16.980><c> evm</c>

00:25:18.649 --> 00:25:18.659 align:start position:0%
kind of mess mess with with evm
 

00:25:18.659 --> 00:25:20.570 align:start position:0%
kind of mess mess with with evm
um<00:25:18.780><c> and</c><00:25:19.320><c> also</c><00:25:19.559><c> and</c><00:25:19.740><c> I</c><00:25:19.919><c> feel</c><00:25:20.039><c> like</c><00:25:20.159><c> that's</c><00:25:20.400><c> the</c>

00:25:20.570 --> 00:25:20.580 align:start position:0%
um and also and I feel like that's the
 

00:25:20.580 --> 00:25:22.070 align:start position:0%
um and also and I feel like that's the
one<00:25:20.820><c> that's</c><00:25:21.000><c> the</c><00:25:21.179><c> most</c><00:25:21.299><c> relevant</c><00:25:21.600><c> in</c><00:25:21.780><c> the</c>

00:25:22.070 --> 00:25:22.080 align:start position:0%
one that's the most relevant in the
 

00:25:22.080 --> 00:25:24.169 align:start position:0%
one that's the most relevant in the
context<00:25:22.320><c> of</c><00:25:22.440><c> my</c><00:25:22.559><c> talk</c><00:25:22.740><c> here</c><00:25:22.980><c> if</c><00:25:23.760><c> we</c><00:25:23.940><c> expect</c>

00:25:24.169 --> 00:25:24.179 align:start position:0%
context of my talk here if we expect
 

00:25:24.179 --> 00:25:25.909 align:start position:0%
context of my talk here if we expect
layer<00:25:24.659><c> one</c><00:25:24.779><c> and</c><00:25:24.900><c> layer</c><00:25:25.140><c> 2</c><00:25:25.260><c> to</c><00:25:25.440><c> really</c><00:25:25.559><c> operate</c>

00:25:25.909 --> 00:25:25.919 align:start position:0%
layer one and layer 2 to really operate
 

00:25:25.919 --> 00:25:27.769 align:start position:0%
layer one and layer 2 to really operate
at<00:25:26.100><c> quite</c><00:25:26.400><c> different</c><00:25:26.640><c> scales</c><00:25:27.419><c> in</c><00:25:27.539><c> terms</c><00:25:27.720><c> of</c>

00:25:27.769 --> 00:25:27.779 align:start position:0%
at quite different scales in terms of
 

00:25:27.779 --> 00:25:30.409 align:start position:0%
at quite different scales in terms of
throughput<00:25:28.140><c> maybe</c><00:25:28.799><c> having</c><00:25:29.100><c> identical</c><00:25:29.640><c> VMS</c><00:25:30.240><c> is</c>

00:25:30.409 --> 00:25:30.419 align:start position:0%
throughput maybe having identical VMS is
 

00:25:30.419 --> 00:25:32.870 align:start position:0%
throughput maybe having identical VMS is
just<00:25:30.659><c> not</c><00:25:30.960><c> the</c><00:25:31.200><c> the</c><00:25:31.500><c> ideal</c><00:25:31.799><c> way</c><00:25:31.980><c> to</c><00:25:32.220><c> to</c><00:25:32.520><c> to</c><00:25:32.640><c> to</c>

00:25:32.870 --> 00:25:32.880 align:start position:0%
just not the the ideal way to to to to
 

00:25:32.880 --> 00:25:35.930 align:start position:0%
just not the the ideal way to to to to
to<00:25:32.940><c> to</c><00:25:33.120><c> go</c><00:25:33.659><c> and</c><00:25:34.320><c> just</c><00:25:34.679><c> as</c><00:25:34.919><c> like</c><00:25:35.100><c> a</c><00:25:35.340><c> potential</c>

00:25:35.930 --> 00:25:35.940 align:start position:0%
to to go and just as like a potential
 

00:25:35.940 --> 00:25:37.610 align:start position:0%
to to go and just as like a potential
promise<00:25:36.480><c> you</c><00:25:36.720><c> or</c><00:25:36.900><c> having</c><00:25:37.020><c> the</c><00:25:37.200><c> Best</c><00:25:37.260><c> of</c><00:25:37.440><c> Both</c>

00:25:37.610 --> 00:25:37.620 align:start position:0%
promise you or having the Best of Both
 

00:25:37.620 --> 00:25:40.010 align:start position:0%
promise you or having the Best of Both
Worlds<00:25:38.039><c> idea</c><00:25:38.760><c> to</c><00:25:39.059><c> that</c><00:25:39.480><c> I</c><00:25:39.600><c> want</c><00:25:39.720><c> to</c><00:25:39.840><c> leave</c><00:25:39.900><c> you</c>

00:25:40.010 --> 00:25:40.020 align:start position:0%
Worlds idea to that I want to leave you
 

00:25:40.020 --> 00:25:42.529 align:start position:0%
Worlds idea to that I want to leave you
with<00:25:40.140><c> here</c><00:25:40.380><c> is</c><00:25:40.620><c> one</c><00:25:41.400><c> that</c><00:25:41.580><c> I</c><00:25:41.820><c> think</c><00:25:42.000><c> might</c>

00:25:42.529 --> 00:25:42.539 align:start position:0%
with here is one that I think might
 

00:25:42.539 --> 00:25:44.029 align:start position:0%
with here is one that I think might
actually<00:25:42.720><c> be</c><00:25:42.900><c> quite</c><00:25:43.080><c> exciting</c><00:25:43.500><c> to</c><00:25:43.620><c> explore</c><00:25:43.919><c> in</c>

00:25:44.029 --> 00:25:44.039 align:start position:0%
actually be quite exciting to explore in
 

00:25:44.039 --> 00:25:45.350 align:start position:0%
actually be quite exciting to explore in
the<00:25:44.159><c> future</c>

00:25:45.350 --> 00:25:45.360 align:start position:0%
the future
 

00:25:45.360 --> 00:25:48.110 align:start position:0%
the future
um<00:25:45.720><c> what</c><00:25:46.440><c> if</c><00:25:46.559><c> we</c><00:25:46.740><c> could</c><00:25:46.919><c> maybe</c><00:25:47.100><c> get</c><00:25:47.640><c> the</c><00:25:48.000><c> Best</c>

00:25:48.110 --> 00:25:48.120 align:start position:0%
um what if we could maybe get the Best
 

00:25:48.120 --> 00:25:51.470 align:start position:0%
um what if we could maybe get the Best
of<00:25:48.360><c> Both</c><00:25:48.600><c> Worlds</c><00:25:49.140><c> by</c><00:25:49.559><c> having</c><00:25:50.279><c> a</c><00:25:50.880><c> dedicated</c>

00:25:51.470 --> 00:25:51.480 align:start position:0%
of Both Worlds by having a dedicated
 

00:25:51.480 --> 00:25:54.649 align:start position:0%
of Both Worlds by having a dedicated
version<00:25:52.440><c> of</c><00:25:52.679><c> the</c><00:25:52.799><c> evm</c><00:25:53.220><c> specs</c><00:25:53.700><c> for</c><00:25:53.880><c> layer</c><00:25:54.299><c> twos</c>

00:25:54.649 --> 00:25:54.659 align:start position:0%
version of the evm specs for layer twos
 

00:25:54.659 --> 00:25:56.390 align:start position:0%
version of the evm specs for layer twos
that's<00:25:55.080><c> still</c><00:25:55.320><c> standardized</c><00:25:55.860><c> across</c><00:25:56.159><c> all</c><00:25:56.279><c> the</c>

00:25:56.390 --> 00:25:56.400 align:start position:0%
that's still standardized across all the
 

00:25:56.400 --> 00:25:59.029 align:start position:0%
that's still standardized across all the
Roll-Ups<00:25:56.820><c> that</c><00:25:56.880><c> want</c><00:25:57.120><c> you</c><00:25:57.480><c> know</c><00:25:57.600><c> to</c><00:25:57.779><c> opt</c><00:25:57.900><c> in</c>

00:25:59.029 --> 00:25:59.039 align:start position:0%
Roll-Ups that want you know to opt in
 

00:25:59.039 --> 00:26:01.070 align:start position:0%
Roll-Ups that want you know to opt in
um but<00:25:59.279><c> is</c><00:25:59.520><c> is</c><00:25:59.760><c> able</c><00:26:00.059><c> to</c><00:26:00.179><c> over</c><00:26:00.360><c> time</c><00:26:00.600><c> depart</c>

00:26:01.070 --> 00:26:01.080 align:start position:0%
um but is is able to over time depart
 

00:26:01.080 --> 00:26:03.230 align:start position:0%
um but is is able to over time depart
from<00:26:01.380><c> layer</c><00:26:01.799><c> one</c><00:26:01.919><c> and</c><00:26:02.100><c> really</c><00:26:02.520><c> focus</c><00:26:02.880><c> on</c><00:26:03.059><c> on</c>

00:26:03.230 --> 00:26:03.240 align:start position:0%
from layer one and really focus on on
 

00:26:03.240 --> 00:26:05.149 align:start position:0%
from layer one and really focus on on
optimize<00:26:03.720><c> for</c><00:26:03.960><c> the</c><00:26:04.200><c> layer</c><00:26:04.440><c> 2K</c><00:26:04.679><c> so</c><00:26:04.860><c> I</c><00:26:05.039><c> think</c>

00:26:05.149 --> 00:26:05.159 align:start position:0%
optimize for the layer 2K so I think
 

00:26:05.159 --> 00:26:07.310 align:start position:0%
optimize for the layer 2K so I think
there's<00:26:05.640><c> a</c><00:26:05.820><c> good</c><00:26:05.940><c> chance</c><00:26:06.120><c> that</c><00:26:06.360><c> we</c><00:26:06.539><c> might</c><00:26:06.779><c> end</c>

00:26:07.310 --> 00:26:07.320 align:start position:0%
there's a good chance that we might end
 

00:26:07.320 --> 00:26:09.169 align:start position:0%
there's a good chance that we might end
up<00:26:07.500><c> in</c><00:26:07.620><c> that</c><00:26:07.799><c> world</c><00:26:07.980><c> and</c><00:26:08.340><c> and</c><00:26:08.460><c> I</c><00:26:08.940><c> think</c><00:26:09.059><c> that</c>

00:26:09.169 --> 00:26:09.179 align:start position:0%
up in that world and and I think that
 

00:26:09.179 --> 00:26:10.970 align:start position:0%
up in that world and and I think that
that<00:26:09.419><c> might</c><00:26:09.600><c> actually</c><00:26:09.779><c> you</c><00:26:10.080><c> know</c><00:26:10.500><c> um</c><00:26:10.559><c> be</c><00:26:10.799><c> the</c>

00:26:10.970 --> 00:26:10.980 align:start position:0%
that might actually you know um be the
 

00:26:10.980 --> 00:26:13.549 align:start position:0%
that might actually you know um be the
be<00:26:11.220><c> the</c><00:26:11.880><c> best</c><00:26:12.000><c> way</c><00:26:12.059><c> to</c><00:26:12.240><c> get</c><00:26:12.659><c> us</c><00:26:12.779><c> to</c><00:26:12.960><c> to</c><00:26:13.080><c> High</c>

00:26:13.549 --> 00:26:13.559 align:start position:0%
be the best way to get us to to High
 

00:26:13.559 --> 00:26:14.690 align:start position:0%
be the best way to get us to to High
scalability

00:26:14.690 --> 00:26:14.700 align:start position:0%
scalability
 

00:26:14.700 --> 00:26:16.250 align:start position:0%
scalability
um<00:26:14.760><c> and</c><00:26:14.940><c> yeah</c><00:26:15.059><c> and</c><00:26:15.240><c> I</c><00:26:15.419><c> think</c><00:26:15.480><c> I</c><00:26:15.720><c> hope</c><00:26:15.900><c> if</c><00:26:16.140><c> I</c>

00:26:16.250 --> 00:26:16.260 align:start position:0%
um and yeah and I think I hope if I
 

00:26:16.260 --> 00:26:17.690 align:start position:0%
um and yeah and I think I hope if I
remember<00:26:16.440><c> correctly</c><00:26:16.860><c> oh</c><00:26:17.039><c> I</c><00:26:17.220><c> do</c><00:26:17.520><c> have</c><00:26:17.640><c> a</c>

00:26:17.690 --> 00:26:17.700 align:start position:0%
remember correctly oh I do have a
 

00:26:17.700 --> 00:26:19.310 align:start position:0%
remember correctly oh I do have a
summary<00:26:18.000><c> slide</c><00:26:18.299><c> so</c><00:26:18.480><c> let</c><00:26:18.840><c> me</c><00:26:18.960><c> briefly</c><00:26:19.200><c> go</c>

00:26:19.310 --> 00:26:19.320 align:start position:0%
summary slide so let me briefly go
 

00:26:19.320 --> 00:26:21.289 align:start position:0%
summary slide so let me briefly go
through<00:26:19.440><c> that</c><00:26:19.620><c> but</c><00:26:19.799><c> then</c><00:26:19.980><c> then</c><00:26:20.220><c> we're</c><00:26:20.640><c> done</c><00:26:20.760><c> so</c>

00:26:21.289 --> 00:26:21.299 align:start position:0%
through that but then then we're done so
 

00:26:21.299 --> 00:26:23.149 align:start position:0%
through that but then then we're done so
you<00:26:21.539><c> know</c><00:26:21.659><c> traditional</c><00:26:22.140><c> uh</c><00:26:22.500><c> blockchains</c><00:26:23.100><c> you</c>

00:26:23.149 --> 00:26:23.159 align:start position:0%
you know traditional uh blockchains you
 

00:26:23.159 --> 00:26:24.470 align:start position:0%
you know traditional uh blockchains you
always<00:26:23.340><c> have</c><00:26:23.520><c> the</c><00:26:23.640><c> trade-off</c><00:26:24.179><c> between</c>

00:26:24.470 --> 00:26:24.480 align:start position:0%
always have the trade-off between
 

00:26:24.480 --> 00:26:27.470 align:start position:0%
always have the trade-off between
security<00:26:24.960><c> and</c><00:26:25.260><c> scalability</c><00:26:25.740><c> uh</c><00:26:26.640><c> Rob</c><00:26:26.940><c> solve</c>

00:26:27.470 --> 00:26:27.480 align:start position:0%
security and scalability uh Rob solve
 

00:26:27.480 --> 00:26:29.390 align:start position:0%
security and scalability uh Rob solve
this<00:26:27.600><c> ethereum's</c><00:26:28.500><c> Vision</c><00:26:28.679><c> we</c><00:26:28.919><c> want</c><00:26:29.039><c> to</c><00:26:29.159><c> become</c>

00:26:29.390 --> 00:26:29.400 align:start position:0%
this ethereum's Vision we want to become
 

00:26:29.400 --> 00:26:31.669 align:start position:0%
this ethereum's Vision we want to become
the<00:26:29.640><c> primary</c><00:26:29.940><c> settlement</c><00:26:30.419><c> chain</c><00:26:30.659><c> we're</c><00:26:31.500><c> still</c>

00:26:31.669 --> 00:26:31.679 align:start position:0%
the primary settlement chain we're still
 

00:26:31.679 --> 00:26:32.570 align:start position:0%
the primary settlement chain we're still
at<00:26:31.799><c> the</c><00:26:31.919><c> very</c><00:26:32.039><c> beginning</c><00:26:32.159><c> of</c><00:26:32.460><c> this</c>

00:26:32.570 --> 00:26:32.580 align:start position:0%
at the very beginning of this
 

00:26:32.580 --> 00:26:33.850 align:start position:0%
at the very beginning of this
transformation

00:26:33.850 --> 00:26:33.860 align:start position:0%
transformation
 

00:26:33.860 --> 00:26:36.470 align:start position:0%
transformation
ethereum<00:26:34.860><c> well</c><00:26:35.279><c> likely</c><00:26:35.700><c> this</c><00:26:35.880><c> this</c><00:26:36.120><c> is</c><00:26:36.299><c> the</c>

00:26:36.470 --> 00:26:36.480 align:start position:0%
ethereum well likely this this is the
 

00:26:36.480 --> 00:26:38.750 align:start position:0%
ethereum well likely this this is the
last<00:26:36.600><c> point</c><00:26:36.900><c> I</c><00:26:37.559><c> I</c><00:26:37.740><c> had</c><00:26:37.980><c> the</c><00:26:38.159><c> likely</c><00:26:38.460><c> because</c>

00:26:38.750 --> 00:26:38.760 align:start position:0%
last point I I had the likely because
 

00:26:38.760 --> 00:26:41.630 align:start position:0%
last point I I had the likely because
who<00:26:39.360><c> knows</c><00:26:39.600><c> right</c><00:26:39.779><c> but</c><00:26:40.020><c> we</c><00:26:40.559><c> we</c><00:26:40.799><c> do</c><00:26:41.039><c> still</c><00:26:41.279><c> with</c>

00:26:41.630 --> 00:26:41.640 align:start position:0%
who knows right but we we do still with
 

00:26:41.640 --> 00:26:44.390 align:start position:0%
who knows right but we we do still with
the<00:26:41.820><c> evm</c><00:26:42.240><c> also</c><00:26:42.779><c> have</c><00:26:42.900><c> Ambitions</c><00:26:43.440><c> for</c><00:26:43.860><c> for</c>

00:26:44.390 --> 00:26:44.400 align:start position:0%
the evm also have Ambitions for for
 

00:26:44.400 --> 00:26:46.909 align:start position:0%
the evm also have Ambitions for for
execution<00:26:44.940><c> chains</c><00:26:45.299><c> we</c><00:26:45.419><c> do</c><00:26:45.600><c> not</c><00:26:45.779><c> just</c><00:26:46.500><c> want</c><00:26:46.740><c> to</c>

00:26:46.909 --> 00:26:46.919 align:start position:0%
execution chains we do not just want to
 

00:26:46.919 --> 00:26:48.890 align:start position:0%
execution chains we do not just want to
be<00:26:47.100><c> to</c><00:26:47.520><c> be</c><00:26:47.700><c> a</c><00:26:47.820><c> settlement</c><00:26:48.120><c> chain</c>

00:26:48.890 --> 00:26:48.900 align:start position:0%
be to be a settlement chain
 

00:26:48.900 --> 00:26:50.750 align:start position:0%
be to be a settlement chain
yeah<00:26:49.320><c> and</c><00:26:49.500><c> with</c><00:26:49.740><c> that</c>

00:26:50.750 --> 00:26:50.760 align:start position:0%
yeah and with that
 

00:26:50.760 --> 00:26:53.660 align:start position:0%
yeah and with that
um<00:26:50.820><c> thanks</c>

00:26:53.660 --> 00:26:53.670 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:26:53.670 --> 00:26:58.660 align:start position:0%
 
[Applause]

