WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:00.500 --> 00:00:04.579 align:start position:0%
 
we<00:00:01.500><c> live</c><00:00:01.680><c> in</c><00:00:01.800><c> a</c><00:00:01.890><c> world</c><00:00:02.899><c> where</c><00:00:03.899><c> there</c><00:00:04.140><c> are</c><00:00:04.170><c> very</c>

00:00:04.579 --> 00:00:04.589 align:start position:0%
we live in a world where there are very
 

00:00:04.589 --> 00:00:09.919 align:start position:0%
we live in a world where there are very
few<00:00:06.529><c> certification</c><00:00:07.529><c> authorities</c><00:00:08.750><c> most</c><00:00:09.750><c> of</c>

00:00:09.919 --> 00:00:09.929 align:start position:0%
few certification authorities most of
 

00:00:09.929 --> 00:00:16.970 align:start position:0%
few certification authorities most of
them<00:00:10.139><c> are</c><00:00:12.710><c> banks</c><00:00:14.240><c> government's</c><00:00:15.980><c> big</c>

00:00:16.970 --> 00:00:16.980 align:start position:0%
them are banks government's big
 

00:00:16.980 --> 00:00:21.980 align:start position:0%
them are banks government's big
corporations<00:00:18.710><c> but</c><00:00:19.710><c> we</c><00:00:20.609><c> want</c><00:00:20.970><c> that</c><00:00:21.539><c> each</c><00:00:21.930><c> of</c>

00:00:21.980 --> 00:00:21.990 align:start position:0%
corporations but we want that each of
 

00:00:21.990 --> 00:00:25.970 align:start position:0%
corporations but we want that each of
you<00:00:22.470><c> each</c><00:00:22.769><c> of</c><00:00:23.010><c> us</c><00:00:23.900><c> can</c><00:00:24.900><c> be</c><00:00:24.960><c> a</c><00:00:25.320><c> certification</c>

00:00:25.970 --> 00:00:25.980 align:start position:0%
you each of us can be a certification
 

00:00:25.980 --> 00:00:29.630 align:start position:0%
you each of us can be a certification
Authority<00:00:26.990><c> that's</c><00:00:27.990><c> the</c><00:00:28.199><c> main</c><00:00:28.380><c> goal</c><00:00:28.410><c> of</c><00:00:28.949><c> the</c>

00:00:29.630 --> 00:00:29.640 align:start position:0%
Authority that's the main goal of the
 

00:00:29.640 --> 00:00:32.600 align:start position:0%
Authority that's the main goal of the
island<00:00:30.150><c> free</c><00:00:30.449><c> project</c><00:00:31.380><c> we</c><00:00:32.160><c> want</c><00:00:32.430><c> to</c>

00:00:32.600 --> 00:00:32.610 align:start position:0%
island free project we want to
 

00:00:32.610 --> 00:00:35.420 align:start position:0%
island free project we want to
democratize<00:00:33.210><c> democratize</c><00:00:34.430><c> the</c>

00:00:35.420 --> 00:00:35.430 align:start position:0%
democratize democratize the
 

00:00:35.430 --> 00:00:38.090 align:start position:0%
democratize democratize the
certification<00:00:36.270><c> part</c><00:00:36.540><c> the</c><00:00:37.320><c> claiming</c><00:00:37.829><c> part</c>

00:00:38.090 --> 00:00:38.100 align:start position:0%
certification part the claiming part
 

00:00:38.100 --> 00:00:41.889 align:start position:0%
certification part the claiming part
when<00:00:38.940><c> we</c><00:00:38.969><c> are</c><00:00:39.180><c> doing</c><00:00:39.480><c> a</c><00:00:39.600><c> claim</c><00:00:39.960><c> not</c><00:00:40.920><c> matter</c><00:00:41.250><c> if</c>

00:00:41.889 --> 00:00:41.899 align:start position:0%
when we are doing a claim not matter if
 

00:00:41.899 --> 00:00:45.740 align:start position:0%
when we are doing a claim not matter if
is<00:00:42.899><c> done</c><00:00:43.739><c> by</c><00:00:43.980><c> a</c><00:00:44.010><c> government</c><00:00:44.309><c> or</c><00:00:44.820><c> if</c><00:00:45.270><c> it's</c><00:00:45.480><c> done</c>

00:00:45.740 --> 00:00:45.750 align:start position:0%
is done by a government or if it's done
 

00:00:45.750 --> 00:00:48.860 align:start position:0%
is done by a government or if it's done
by<00:00:46.320><c> your</c><00:00:46.530><c> fake</c><00:00:46.890><c> identity</c><00:00:47.640><c> when</c><00:00:48.570><c> they</c><00:00:48.780><c> are</c>

00:00:48.860 --> 00:00:48.870 align:start position:0%
by your fake identity when they are
 

00:00:48.870 --> 00:00:51.740 align:start position:0%
by your fake identity when they are
doing<00:00:49.079><c> a</c><00:00:49.289><c> claim</c><00:00:49.850><c> cryptographically</c><00:00:50.850><c> this</c>

00:00:51.740 --> 00:00:51.750 align:start position:0%
doing a claim cryptographically this
 

00:00:51.750 --> 00:00:54.319 align:start position:0%
doing a claim cryptographically this
claim<00:00:52.079><c> is</c><00:00:52.289><c> exactly</c><00:00:52.800><c> the</c><00:00:52.980><c> same</c><00:00:53.190><c> it's</c><00:00:53.820><c> a</c><00:00:54.059><c> claim</c>

00:00:54.319 --> 00:00:54.329 align:start position:0%
claim is exactly the same it's a claim
 

00:00:54.329 --> 00:00:57.590 align:start position:0%
claim is exactly the same it's a claim
that<00:00:54.930><c> can</c><00:00:55.170><c> be</c><00:00:55.320><c> proved</c><00:00:55.620><c> tomorrow</c><00:00:56.579><c> or</c><00:00:56.969><c> any</c><00:00:57.329><c> day</c>

00:00:57.590 --> 00:00:57.600 align:start position:0%
that can be proved tomorrow or any day
 

00:00:57.600 --> 00:01:02.650 align:start position:0%
that can be proved tomorrow or any day
in<00:00:57.780><c> the</c><00:00:57.870><c> future</c><00:01:00.260><c> before</c><00:01:01.260><c> going</c><00:01:01.829><c> deep</c><00:01:02.039><c> in</c><00:01:02.280><c> what</c>

00:01:02.650 --> 00:01:02.660 align:start position:0%
in the future before going deep in what
 

00:01:02.660 --> 00:01:06.100 align:start position:0%
in the future before going deep in what
technically<00:01:03.660><c> we</c><00:01:03.780><c> were</c><00:01:03.989><c> doing</c><00:01:04.320><c> in</c><00:01:04.559><c> iron</c><00:01:05.309><c> 3</c><00:01:05.580><c> I</c>

00:01:06.100 --> 00:01:06.110 align:start position:0%
technically we were doing in iron 3 I
 

00:01:06.110 --> 00:01:08.420 align:start position:0%
technically we were doing in iron 3 I
would<00:01:07.110><c> like</c><00:01:07.320><c> first</c><00:01:07.590><c> to</c><00:01:07.770><c> introduce</c><00:01:08.189><c> three</c>

00:01:08.420 --> 00:01:08.430 align:start position:0%
would like first to introduce three
 

00:01:08.430 --> 00:01:10.580 align:start position:0%
would like first to introduce three
concepts<00:01:08.939><c> I</c><00:01:09.210><c> want</c><00:01:09.570><c> to</c><00:01:09.900><c> introduce</c><00:01:10.260><c> what</c><00:01:10.560><c> we</c>

00:01:10.580 --> 00:01:10.590 align:start position:0%
concepts I want to introduce what we
 

00:01:10.590 --> 00:01:14.000 align:start position:0%
concepts I want to introduce what we
understand<00:01:11.510><c> as</c><00:01:12.510><c> an</c><00:01:12.750><c> identity</c><00:01:13.170><c> what</c><00:01:13.860><c> we</c>

00:01:14.000 --> 00:01:14.010 align:start position:0%
understand as an identity what we
 

00:01:14.010 --> 00:01:17.690 align:start position:0%
understand as an identity what we
understand<00:01:14.640><c> as</c><00:01:15.270><c> a</c><00:01:16.200><c> claim</c><00:01:16.470><c> and</c><00:01:16.799><c> when</c><00:01:17.159><c> what</c><00:01:17.520><c> we</c>

00:01:17.690 --> 00:01:17.700 align:start position:0%
understand as a claim and when what we
 

00:01:17.700 --> 00:01:21.649 align:start position:0%
understand as a claim and when what we
understand<00:01:18.240><c> as</c><00:01:18.509><c> a</c><00:01:18.570><c> proof</c><00:01:19.460><c> identity</c><00:01:20.460><c> I</c><00:01:20.729><c> don't</c>

00:01:21.649 --> 00:01:21.659 align:start position:0%
understand as a proof identity I don't
 

00:01:21.659 --> 00:01:24.800 align:start position:0%
understand as a proof identity I don't
want<00:01:21.840><c> to</c><00:01:22.080><c> go</c><00:01:22.320><c> deep</c><00:01:22.770><c> I</c><00:01:23.220><c> don't</c><00:01:24.030><c> want</c><00:01:24.210><c> to</c><00:01:24.420><c> enter</c><00:01:24.540><c> in</c>

00:01:24.800 --> 00:01:24.810 align:start position:0%
want to go deep I don't want to enter in
 

00:01:24.810 --> 00:01:27.770 align:start position:0%
want to go deep I don't want to enter in
philosophical<00:01:26.030><c> philosophical</c><00:01:27.030><c> definitions</c>

00:01:27.770 --> 00:01:27.780 align:start position:0%
philosophical philosophical definitions
 

00:01:27.780 --> 00:01:29.480 align:start position:0%
philosophical philosophical definitions
and<00:01:27.990><c> all</c><00:01:28.110><c> that</c><00:01:28.320><c> I</c><00:01:28.619><c> will</c><00:01:29.040><c> put</c><00:01:29.189><c> you</c><00:01:29.310><c> some</c>

00:01:29.480 --> 00:01:29.490 align:start position:0%
and all that I will put you some
 

00:01:29.490 --> 00:01:31.700 align:start position:0%
and all that I will put you some
examples<00:01:30.000><c> an</c><00:01:30.180><c> identity</c><00:01:30.570><c> can</c><00:01:30.840><c> be</c><00:01:30.869><c> a</c><00:01:30.990><c> person</c><00:01:31.500><c> but</c>

00:01:31.700 --> 00:01:31.710 align:start position:0%
examples an identity can be a person but
 

00:01:31.710 --> 00:01:34.940 align:start position:0%
examples an identity can be a person but
can<00:01:32.280><c> be</c><00:01:32.430><c> a</c><00:01:32.700><c> company</c><00:01:33.420><c> can</c><00:01:33.990><c> be</c><00:01:34.110><c> an</c><00:01:34.229><c> organization</c>

00:01:34.940 --> 00:01:34.950 align:start position:0%
can be a company can be an organization
 

00:01:34.950 --> 00:01:38.420 align:start position:0%
can be a company can be an organization
can<00:01:35.250><c> be</c><00:01:35.400><c> a</c><00:01:35.430><c> dau</c><00:01:35.670><c> can</c><00:01:36.540><c> be</c><00:01:36.689><c> a</c><00:01:36.720><c> government</c><00:01:37.110><c> or</c><00:01:37.500><c> if</c>

00:01:38.420 --> 00:01:38.430 align:start position:0%
can be a dau can be a government or if
 

00:01:38.430 --> 00:01:40.640 align:start position:0%
can be a dau can be a government or if
you<00:01:38.610><c> want</c><00:01:38.850><c> even</c><00:01:39.450><c> can</c><00:01:39.689><c> be</c><00:01:39.840><c> a</c><00:01:39.869><c> thing</c><00:01:40.259><c> you</c><00:01:40.530><c> know</c>

00:01:40.640 --> 00:01:40.650 align:start position:0%
you want even can be a thing you know
 

00:01:40.650 --> 00:01:43.160 align:start position:0%
you want even can be a thing you know
can<00:01:40.890><c> be</c><00:01:40.920><c> a</c><00:01:41.070><c> microphone</c><00:01:41.790><c> or</c><00:01:41.850><c> can</c><00:01:42.240><c> be</c><00:01:42.390><c> a</c><00:01:42.420><c> chair</c><00:01:42.899><c> or</c>

00:01:43.160 --> 00:01:43.170 align:start position:0%
can be a microphone or can be a chair or
 

00:01:43.170 --> 00:01:45.350 align:start position:0%
can be a microphone or can be a chair or
can<00:01:43.560><c> be</c><00:01:43.680><c> this</c><00:01:43.829><c> room</c><00:01:44.130><c> half</c><00:01:44.640><c> an</c><00:01:44.790><c> identity</c><00:01:45.119><c> or</c><00:01:45.240><c> a</c>

00:01:45.350 --> 00:01:45.360 align:start position:0%
can be this room half an identity or a
 

00:01:45.360 --> 00:01:46.819 align:start position:0%
can be this room half an identity or a
bought<00:01:45.619><c> okay</c>

00:01:46.819 --> 00:01:46.829 align:start position:0%
bought okay
 

00:01:46.829 --> 00:01:49.730 align:start position:0%
bought okay
in<00:01:47.399><c> we</c><00:01:47.850><c> in</c><00:01:48.180><c> an</c><00:01:48.659><c> or</c><00:01:48.869><c> system</c><00:01:49.259><c> when</c><00:01:49.409><c> we</c><00:01:49.530><c> talk</c><00:01:49.710><c> about</c>

00:01:49.730 --> 00:01:49.740 align:start position:0%
in we in an or system when we talk about
 

00:01:49.740 --> 00:01:51.800 align:start position:0%
in we in an or system when we talk about
the<00:01:50.159><c> identity</c><00:01:50.640><c> mainly</c><00:01:51.329><c> we</c><00:01:51.450><c> refer</c><00:01:51.780><c> to</c>

00:01:51.800 --> 00:01:51.810 align:start position:0%
the identity mainly we refer to
 

00:01:51.810 --> 00:01:56.120 align:start position:0%
the identity mainly we refer to
identities<00:01:52.500><c> as</c><00:01:53.930><c> accounts</c><00:01:54.930><c> we</c><00:01:55.560><c> represent</c>

00:01:56.120 --> 00:01:56.130 align:start position:0%
identities as accounts we represent
 

00:01:56.130 --> 00:01:58.340 align:start position:0%
identities as accounts we represent
identities<00:01:56.790><c> by</c><00:01:56.969><c> accounts</c><00:01:57.509><c> in</c><00:01:57.630><c> general</c><00:01:58.140><c> they</c>

00:01:58.340 --> 00:01:58.350 align:start position:0%
identities by accounts in general they
 

00:01:58.350 --> 00:02:00.800 align:start position:0%
identities by accounts in general they
are<00:01:58.380><c> going</c><00:01:58.680><c> to</c><00:01:58.740><c> be</c><00:01:58.860><c> smart</c><00:01:59.130><c> contracts</c><00:01:59.729><c> okay</c><00:02:00.420><c> so</c>

00:02:00.800 --> 00:02:00.810 align:start position:0%
are going to be smart contracts okay so
 

00:02:00.810 --> 00:02:02.749 align:start position:0%
are going to be smart contracts okay so
the<00:02:01.229><c> address</c><00:02:01.649><c> of</c><00:02:01.770><c> a</c><00:02:01.860><c> smart</c><00:02:02.070><c> contract</c><00:02:02.460><c> is</c><00:02:02.549><c> going</c>

00:02:02.749 --> 00:02:02.759 align:start position:0%
the address of a smart contract is going
 

00:02:02.759 --> 00:02:06.740 align:start position:0%
the address of a smart contract is going
to<00:02:02.850><c> be</c><00:02:02.909><c> or</c><00:02:03.200><c> identifier</c><00:02:04.200><c> of</c><00:02:04.469><c> that</c><00:02:04.829><c> identity</c><00:02:05.750><c> the</c>

00:02:06.740 --> 00:02:06.750 align:start position:0%
to be or identifier of that identity the
 

00:02:06.750 --> 00:02:11.410 align:start position:0%
to be or identifier of that identity the
next<00:02:06.990><c> concept</c><00:02:07.439><c> is</c><00:02:08.039><c> about</c><00:02:08.280><c> claim</c><00:02:08.759><c> claim</c><00:02:09.479><c> is</c>

00:02:11.410 --> 00:02:11.420 align:start position:0%
next concept is about claim claim is
 

00:02:11.420 --> 00:02:12.790 align:start position:0%
next concept is about claim claim is
understand<00:02:12.420><c> me</c>

00:02:12.790 --> 00:02:12.800 align:start position:0%
understand me
 

00:02:12.800 --> 00:02:15.160 align:start position:0%
understand me
if<00:02:13.370><c> you</c><00:02:13.580><c> want</c><00:02:13.790><c> and</c><00:02:14.030><c> and</c><00:02:14.390><c> not</c><00:02:14.570><c> rightist</c><00:02:15.080><c> a</c>

00:02:15.160 --> 00:02:15.170 align:start position:0%
if you want and and not rightist a
 

00:02:15.170 --> 00:02:18.970 align:start position:0%
if you want and and not rightist a
statment<00:02:15.820><c> okay</c><00:02:16.820><c> so</c><00:02:17.390><c> something</c><00:02:17.870><c> that</c><00:02:18.140><c> an</c>

00:02:18.970 --> 00:02:18.980 align:start position:0%
statment okay so something that an
 

00:02:18.980 --> 00:02:21.940 align:start position:0%
statment okay so something that an
identity<00:02:19.490><c> is</c><00:02:19.760><c> saying</c><00:02:20.410><c> most</c><00:02:21.410><c> of</c><00:02:21.560><c> the</c><00:02:21.680><c> times</c>

00:02:21.940 --> 00:02:21.950 align:start position:0%
identity is saying most of the times
 

00:02:21.950 --> 00:02:24.700 align:start position:0%
identity is saying most of the times
these<00:02:22.520><c> talents</c><00:02:23.240><c> refer</c><00:02:23.630><c> to</c><00:02:23.870><c> other</c><00:02:24.050><c> identities</c>

00:02:24.700 --> 00:02:24.710 align:start position:0%
these talents refer to other identities
 

00:02:24.710 --> 00:02:29.890 align:start position:0%
these talents refer to other identities
for<00:02:25.700><c> example</c><00:02:26.350><c> when</c><00:02:27.350><c> a</c><00:02:27.640><c> university</c><00:02:28.640><c> is</c><00:02:29.390><c> saying</c>

00:02:29.890 --> 00:02:29.900 align:start position:0%
for example when a university is saying
 

00:02:29.900 --> 00:02:33.010 align:start position:0%
for example when a university is saying
that<00:02:30.770><c> this</c><00:02:31.460><c> a</c><00:02:31.520><c> student</c><00:02:32.030><c> make</c><00:02:32.480><c> it</c><00:02:32.660><c> make</c><00:02:32.840><c> the</c>

00:02:33.010 --> 00:02:33.020 align:start position:0%
that this a student make it make the
 

00:02:33.020 --> 00:02:35.440 align:start position:0%
that this a student make it make the
degree<00:02:33.320><c> this</c><00:02:34.220><c> is</c><00:02:34.400><c> a</c><00:02:34.430><c> stand</c><00:02:34.910><c> man</c><00:02:35.090><c> this</c><00:02:35.300><c> is</c><00:02:35.420><c> a</c>

00:02:35.440 --> 00:02:35.450 align:start position:0%
degree this is a stand man this is a
 

00:02:35.450 --> 00:02:38.620 align:start position:0%
degree this is a stand man this is a
claim<00:02:35.870><c> that</c><00:02:36.320><c> the</c><00:02:36.500><c> university</c><00:02:37.070><c> is</c><00:02:37.280><c> doing</c><00:02:37.790><c> over</c>

00:02:38.620 --> 00:02:38.630 align:start position:0%
claim that the university is doing over
 

00:02:38.630 --> 00:02:41.290 align:start position:0%
claim that the university is doing over
that<00:02:38.840><c> student</c><00:02:39.590><c> but</c><00:02:40.340><c> if</c><00:02:40.580><c> you</c><00:02:40.790><c> think</c><00:02:41.090><c> a</c><00:02:41.180><c> little</c>

00:02:41.290 --> 00:02:41.300 align:start position:0%
that student but if you think a little
 

00:02:41.300 --> 00:02:44.650 align:start position:0%
that student but if you think a little
bit<00:02:41.600><c> you</c><00:02:41.990><c> will</c><00:02:42.140><c> see</c><00:02:42.440><c> that</c><00:02:42.860><c> almost</c><00:02:43.660><c> anything</c>

00:02:44.650 --> 00:02:44.660 align:start position:0%
bit you will see that almost anything
 

00:02:44.660 --> 00:02:47.680 align:start position:0%
bit you will see that almost anything
that<00:02:44.990><c> we</c><00:02:45.710><c> are</c><00:02:45.830><c> saying</c><00:02:46.160><c> can</c><00:02:46.460><c> be</c><00:02:46.610><c> not</c><00:02:46.790><c> rights</c><00:02:47.060><c> can</c>

00:02:47.680 --> 00:02:47.690 align:start position:0%
that we are saying can be not rights can
 

00:02:47.690 --> 00:02:50.620 align:start position:0%
that we are saying can be not rights can
be<00:02:47.810><c> converted</c><00:02:48.110><c> as</c><00:02:48.410><c> a</c><00:02:48.440><c> claim</c><00:02:49.390><c> examples</c><00:02:50.390><c> an</c>

00:02:50.620 --> 00:02:50.630 align:start position:0%
be converted as a claim examples an
 

00:02:50.630 --> 00:02:56.680 align:start position:0%
be converted as a claim examples an
invoice<00:02:51.200><c> that's</c><00:02:51.950><c> making</c><00:02:52.370><c> a</c><00:02:52.490><c> company</c><00:02:53.090><c> I</c><00:02:55.690><c> like</c>

00:02:56.680 --> 00:02:56.690 align:start position:0%
invoice that's making a company I like
 

00:02:56.690 --> 00:03:01.450 align:start position:0%
invoice that's making a company I like
in<00:02:57.560><c> a</c><00:02:57.710><c> facebook</c><00:02:58.330><c> can</c><00:02:59.330><c> be</c><00:02:59.530><c> an</c><00:03:00.530><c> endorsement</c><00:03:01.070><c> to</c>

00:03:01.450 --> 00:03:01.460 align:start position:0%
in a facebook can be an endorsement to
 

00:03:01.460 --> 00:03:05.020 align:start position:0%
in a facebook can be an endorsement to
somebody<00:03:02.000><c> else</c><00:03:02.920><c> or</c><00:03:03.920><c> if</c><00:03:04.040><c> you</c><00:03:04.190><c> want</c><00:03:04.430><c> even</c><00:03:04.760><c> a</c>

00:03:05.020 --> 00:03:05.030 align:start position:0%
somebody else or if you want even a
 

00:03:05.030 --> 00:03:07.450 align:start position:0%
somebody else or if you want even a
single<00:03:05.270><c> message</c><00:03:05.780><c> a</c><00:03:06.050><c> single</c><00:03:06.470><c> email</c><00:03:06.590><c> at</c><00:03:07.190><c> the</c><00:03:07.340><c> end</c>

00:03:07.450 --> 00:03:07.460 align:start position:0%
single message a single email at the end
 

00:03:07.460 --> 00:03:10.330 align:start position:0%
single message a single email at the end
is<00:03:07.670><c> a</c><00:03:07.700><c> claim</c><00:03:08.090><c> that</c><00:03:08.630><c> I'm</c><00:03:08.810><c> doing</c><00:03:08.990><c> as</c><00:03:09.380><c> you</c><00:03:10.010><c> can</c><00:03:10.160><c> see</c>

00:03:10.330 --> 00:03:10.340 align:start position:0%
is a claim that I'm doing as you can see
 

00:03:10.340 --> 00:03:13.060 align:start position:0%
is a claim that I'm doing as you can see
there<00:03:10.580><c> are</c><00:03:10.670><c> claims</c><00:03:10.940><c> that</c><00:03:11.090><c> can</c><00:03:11.330><c> be</c><00:03:11.470><c> public</c><00:03:12.470><c> but</c>

00:03:13.060 --> 00:03:13.070 align:start position:0%
there are claims that can be public but
 

00:03:13.070 --> 00:03:14.580 align:start position:0%
there are claims that can be public but
there<00:03:13.220><c> are</c><00:03:13.340><c> so</c><00:03:13.490><c> claims</c><00:03:13.760><c> that</c><00:03:13.910><c> can</c><00:03:14.090><c> be</c><00:03:14.210><c> private</c>

00:03:14.580 --> 00:03:14.590 align:start position:0%
there are so claims that can be private
 

00:03:14.590 --> 00:03:16.780 align:start position:0%
there are so claims that can be private
claims<00:03:15.590><c> is</c><00:03:15.770><c> something</c><00:03:16.130><c> that</c><00:03:16.280><c> we</c><00:03:16.460><c> are</c><00:03:16.490><c> just</c>

00:03:16.780 --> 00:03:16.790 align:start position:0%
claims is something that we are just
 

00:03:16.790 --> 00:03:20.560 align:start position:0%
claims is something that we are just
saying<00:03:17.110><c> okay</c><00:03:18.110><c> and</c><00:03:18.290><c> the</c><00:03:18.830><c> next</c><00:03:19.190><c> and</c><00:03:19.430><c> why</c><00:03:20.090><c> we</c><00:03:20.330><c> want</c>

00:03:20.560 --> 00:03:20.570 align:start position:0%
saying okay and the next and why we want
 

00:03:20.570 --> 00:03:22.810 align:start position:0%
saying okay and the next and why we want
to<00:03:20.630><c> do</c><00:03:20.810><c> claims</c><00:03:21.110><c> why</c><00:03:21.800><c> we</c><00:03:22.010><c> want</c><00:03:22.250><c> to</c><00:03:22.430><c> not</c><00:03:22.580><c> write</c>

00:03:22.810 --> 00:03:22.820 align:start position:0%
to do claims why we want to not write
 

00:03:22.820 --> 00:03:23.380 align:start position:0%
to do claims why we want to not write
claims

00:03:23.380 --> 00:03:23.390 align:start position:0%
claims
 

00:03:23.390 --> 00:03:25.870 align:start position:0%
claims
mainly<00:03:24.170><c> because</c><00:03:24.320><c> we</c><00:03:24.740><c> want</c><00:03:25.010><c> to</c><00:03:25.220><c> prove</c><00:03:25.520><c> those</c>

00:03:25.870 --> 00:03:25.880 align:start position:0%
mainly because we want to prove those
 

00:03:25.880 --> 00:03:29.980 align:start position:0%
mainly because we want to prove those
claims<00:03:27.459><c> sometime</c><00:03:28.459><c> in</c><00:03:28.670><c> the</c><00:03:28.790><c> future</c><00:03:28.940><c> and</c><00:03:29.390><c> here</c>

00:03:29.980 --> 00:03:29.990 align:start position:0%
claims sometime in the future and here
 

00:03:29.990 --> 00:03:33.730 align:start position:0%
claims sometime in the future and here
is<00:03:30.140><c> these</c><00:03:30.440><c> three</c><00:03:31.390><c> actor</c><00:03:32.390><c> parties</c><00:03:32.870><c> they</c><00:03:33.709><c> have</c>

00:03:33.730 --> 00:03:33.740 align:start position:0%
is these three actor parties they have
 

00:03:33.740 --> 00:03:35.949 align:start position:0%
is these three actor parties they have
the<00:03:34.160><c> claimer</c><00:03:34.430><c> this</c><00:03:35.360><c> game</c><00:03:35.570><c> could</c><00:03:35.780><c> be</c><00:03:35.870><c> the</c>

00:03:35.949 --> 00:03:35.959 align:start position:0%
the claimer this game could be the
 

00:03:35.959 --> 00:03:38.530 align:start position:0%
the claimer this game could be the
university<00:03:36.590><c> that's</c><00:03:37.280><c> doing</c><00:03:37.520><c> the</c><00:03:37.670><c> claim</c><00:03:37.910><c> over</c><00:03:38.120><c> a</c>

00:03:38.530 --> 00:03:38.540 align:start position:0%
university that's doing the claim over a
 

00:03:38.540 --> 00:03:42.910 align:start position:0%
university that's doing the claim over a
student<00:03:39.130><c> and</c><00:03:40.390><c> then</c><00:03:41.390><c> the</c><00:03:41.660><c> student</c><00:03:41.840><c> when</c><00:03:42.680><c> goes</c>

00:03:42.910 --> 00:03:42.920 align:start position:0%
student and then the student when goes
 

00:03:42.920 --> 00:03:47.500 align:start position:0%
student and then the student when goes
to<00:03:43.190><c> for</c><00:03:43.520><c> a</c><00:03:43.550><c> job</c><00:03:43.880><c> and</c><00:03:44.090><c> is</c><00:03:44.800><c> proving</c><00:03:46.390><c> to</c><00:03:47.390><c> the</c>

00:03:47.500 --> 00:03:47.510 align:start position:0%
to for a job and is proving to the
 

00:03:47.510 --> 00:03:51.190 align:start position:0%
to for a job and is proving to the
employee<00:03:47.959><c> that</c><00:03:48.490><c> he</c><00:03:49.490><c> already</c><00:03:49.670><c> had</c><00:03:50.420><c> this</c><00:03:50.750><c> degree</c>

00:03:51.190 --> 00:03:51.200 align:start position:0%
employee that he already had this degree
 

00:03:51.200 --> 00:03:54.720 align:start position:0%
employee that he already had this degree
and<00:03:51.760><c> because</c><00:03:52.760><c> there</c><00:03:53.000><c> is</c><00:03:53.060><c> this</c><00:03:53.650><c> relationship</c>

00:03:54.720 --> 00:03:54.730 align:start position:0%
and because there is this relationship
 

00:03:54.730 --> 00:03:57.850 align:start position:0%
and because there is this relationship
this<00:03:55.730><c> truce</c><00:03:56.060><c> Ness</c><00:03:56.270><c> between</c><00:03:56.780><c> the</c><00:03:57.200><c> employee</c><00:03:57.470><c> and</c>

00:03:57.850 --> 00:03:57.860 align:start position:0%
this truce Ness between the employee and
 

00:03:57.860 --> 00:04:01.630 align:start position:0%
this truce Ness between the employee and
the<00:03:57.890><c> university</c><00:03:58.850><c> this</c><00:03:59.660><c> proof</c><00:03:59.990><c> is</c><00:04:00.459><c> valid</c><00:04:01.459><c> for</c>

00:04:01.630 --> 00:04:01.640 align:start position:0%
the university this proof is valid for
 

00:04:01.640 --> 00:04:06.550 align:start position:0%
the university this proof is valid for
him<00:04:03.130><c> okay</c><00:04:04.160><c> these</c><00:04:04.670><c> proofs</c><00:04:04.970><c> can</c><00:04:05.930><c> be</c><00:04:06.050><c> many</c><00:04:06.230><c> kind</c>

00:04:06.550 --> 00:04:06.560 align:start position:0%
him okay these proofs can be many kind
 

00:04:06.560 --> 00:04:08.350 align:start position:0%
him okay these proofs can be many kind
of<00:04:06.740><c> proof</c><00:04:06.980><c> we</c><00:04:07.400><c> will</c><00:04:07.520><c> talk</c><00:04:07.700><c> a</c><00:04:07.730><c> little</c><00:04:07.880><c> bit</c><00:04:08.150><c> later</c>

00:04:08.350 --> 00:04:08.360 align:start position:0%
of proof we will talk a little bit later
 

00:04:08.360 --> 00:04:11.710 align:start position:0%
of proof we will talk a little bit later
but<00:04:08.989><c> can</c><00:04:09.260><c> be</c><00:04:09.410><c> on</c><00:04:09.709><c> chain</c><00:04:10.370><c> proof</c><00:04:10.670><c> if</c><00:04:10.970><c> you</c><00:04:11.420><c> want</c><00:04:11.600><c> to</c>

00:04:11.710 --> 00:04:11.720 align:start position:0%
but can be on chain proof if you want to
 

00:04:11.720 --> 00:04:14.080 align:start position:0%
but can be on chain proof if you want to
prove<00:04:11.930><c> to</c><00:04:12.110><c> a</c><00:04:12.140><c> smart</c><00:04:12.410><c> contract</c><00:04:12.860><c> of</c><00:04:13.040><c> chain</c><00:04:13.790><c> proof</c>

00:04:14.080 --> 00:04:14.090 align:start position:0%
prove to a smart contract of chain proof
 

00:04:14.090 --> 00:04:16.170 align:start position:0%
prove to a smart contract of chain proof
when<00:04:14.450><c> you</c><00:04:14.570><c> want</c><00:04:14.780><c> to</c><00:04:14.900><c> prove</c><00:04:15.350><c> peer-to-peer</c>

00:04:16.170 --> 00:04:16.180 align:start position:0%
when you want to prove peer-to-peer
 

00:04:16.180 --> 00:04:18.520 align:start position:0%
when you want to prove peer-to-peer
public<00:04:17.180><c> proof</c><00:04:17.450><c> when</c><00:04:17.810><c> you</c><00:04:17.900><c> want</c><00:04:18.049><c> to</c><00:04:18.169><c> prove</c><00:04:18.380><c> to</c>

00:04:18.520 --> 00:04:18.530 align:start position:0%
public proof when you want to prove to
 

00:04:18.530 --> 00:04:21.520 align:start position:0%
public proof when you want to prove to
everybody<00:04:19.540><c> there</c><00:04:20.540><c> are</c><00:04:20.630><c> many</c><00:04:20.870><c> kind</c><00:04:21.169><c> of</c><00:04:21.260><c> proof</c>

00:04:21.520 --> 00:04:21.530 align:start position:0%
everybody there are many kind of proof
 

00:04:21.530 --> 00:04:24.010 align:start position:0%
everybody there are many kind of proof
but<00:04:21.770><c> the</c><00:04:21.830><c> system</c><00:04:22.280><c> at</c><00:04:22.400><c> the</c><00:04:22.550><c> end</c><00:04:22.700><c> works</c><00:04:23.210><c> about</c><00:04:23.570><c> -</c>

00:04:24.010 --> 00:04:24.020 align:start position:0%
but the system at the end works about -
 

00:04:24.020 --> 00:04:27.230 align:start position:0%
but the system at the end works about -
we're<00:04:24.169><c> talking</c><00:04:24.350><c> about</c><00:04:24.620><c> this</c><00:04:25.160><c> kind</c><00:04:25.370><c> of</c>

00:04:27.230 --> 00:04:27.240 align:start position:0%
we're talking about this kind of
 

00:04:27.240 --> 00:04:34.610 align:start position:0%
we're talking about this kind of
in<00:04:28.240><c> area</c><00:04:28.600><c> 3</c><00:04:28.840><c> what</c><00:04:29.770><c> are</c><00:04:29.800><c> the</c><00:04:31.949><c> road</c><00:04:32.949><c> or</c><00:04:33.160><c> goals</c>

00:04:34.610 --> 00:04:34.620 align:start position:0%
in area 3 what are the road or goals
 

00:04:34.620 --> 00:04:38.610 align:start position:0%
in area 3 what are the road or goals
what<00:04:35.620><c> we</c><00:04:35.800><c> won</c><00:04:36.010><c> we</c><00:04:36.490><c> won</c><00:04:36.699><c> a</c><00:04:36.940><c> system</c><00:04:37.660><c> that</c><00:04:38.320><c> first</c>

00:04:38.610 --> 00:04:38.620 align:start position:0%
what we won we won a system that first
 

00:04:38.620 --> 00:04:42.270 align:start position:0%
what we won we won a system that first
of<00:04:38.800><c> all</c><00:04:38.949><c> must</c><00:04:39.669><c> be</c><00:04:39.850><c> private</c><00:04:40.660><c> by</c><00:04:41.110><c> design</c><00:04:41.560><c> and</c><00:04:41.830><c> by</c>

00:04:42.270 --> 00:04:42.280 align:start position:0%
of all must be private by design and by
 

00:04:42.280 --> 00:04:45.960 align:start position:0%
of all must be private by design and by
default<00:04:43.020><c> privacy</c><00:04:44.020><c> is</c><00:04:44.530><c> an</c><00:04:44.889><c> important</c><00:04:45.430><c> value</c><00:04:45.550><c> of</c>

00:04:45.960 --> 00:04:45.970 align:start position:0%
default privacy is an important value of
 

00:04:45.970 --> 00:04:50.640 align:start position:0%
default privacy is an important value of
iron<00:04:47.160><c> 3-1</c><00:04:48.190><c> self</c><00:04:48.760><c> sovereign</c><00:04:49.150><c> identity</c><00:04:49.840><c> we</c><00:04:50.350><c> want</c>

00:04:50.640 --> 00:04:50.650 align:start position:0%
iron 3-1 self sovereign identity we want
 

00:04:50.650 --> 00:04:54.629 align:start position:0%
iron 3-1 self sovereign identity we want
to<00:04:51.840><c> address</c><00:04:52.840><c> the</c><00:04:53.050><c> key</c><00:04:53.229><c> management</c><00:04:53.530><c> we</c><00:04:54.280><c> want</c><00:04:54.490><c> to</c>

00:04:54.629 --> 00:04:54.639 align:start position:0%
to address the key management we want to
 

00:04:54.639 --> 00:04:57.810 align:start position:0%
to address the key management we want to
be<00:04:54.760><c> accessible</c><00:04:55.720><c> usable</c><00:04:56.350><c> we</c><00:04:57.340><c> need</c><00:04:57.550><c> to</c><00:04:57.699><c> be</c>

00:04:57.810 --> 00:04:57.820 align:start position:0%
be accessible usable we need to be
 

00:04:57.820 --> 00:05:00.750 align:start position:0%
be accessible usable we need to be
scalable<00:04:58.240><c> and</c><00:04:58.720><c> we</c><00:04:59.710><c> also</c><00:04:59.860><c> want</c><00:05:00.280><c> to</c><00:05:00.490><c> be</c>

00:05:00.750 --> 00:05:00.760 align:start position:0%
scalable and we also want to be
 

00:05:00.760 --> 00:05:02.700 align:start position:0%
scalable and we also want to be
universal<00:05:01.540><c> that</c><00:05:01.660><c> is</c><00:05:01.780><c> interoperable</c><00:05:02.080><c> between</c>

00:05:02.700 --> 00:05:02.710 align:start position:0%
universal that is interoperable between
 

00:05:02.710 --> 00:05:06.050 align:start position:0%
universal that is interoperable between
the<00:05:02.800><c> systems</c><00:05:03.190><c> ok</c><00:05:04.090><c> let's</c><00:05:04.510><c> go</c><00:05:05.050><c> step</c><00:05:05.410><c> by</c><00:05:05.470><c> step</c>

00:05:06.050 --> 00:05:06.060 align:start position:0%
the systems ok let's go step by step
 

00:05:06.060 --> 00:05:09.570 align:start position:0%
the systems ok let's go step by step
first<00:05:07.060><c> cell</c><00:05:07.840><c> sovereign</c><00:05:08.290><c> identity</c><00:05:08.860><c> what</c><00:05:09.400><c> does</c>

00:05:09.570 --> 00:05:09.580 align:start position:0%
first cell sovereign identity what does
 

00:05:09.580 --> 00:05:12.120 align:start position:0%
first cell sovereign identity what does
it<00:05:09.729><c> mean</c><00:05:09.910><c> with</c><00:05:10.270><c> that</c><00:05:10.479><c> that</c><00:05:11.110><c> means</c><00:05:11.380><c> that</c><00:05:11.620><c> any</c><00:05:11.889><c> of</c>

00:05:12.120 --> 00:05:12.130 align:start position:0%
it mean with that that means that any of
 

00:05:12.130 --> 00:05:15.960 align:start position:0%
it mean with that that means that any of
you<00:05:12.340><c> can</c><00:05:13.180><c> create</c><00:05:13.720><c> as</c><00:05:13.990><c> many</c><00:05:14.729><c> identities</c><00:05:15.729><c> as</c>

00:05:15.960 --> 00:05:15.970 align:start position:0%
you can create as many identities as
 

00:05:15.970 --> 00:05:21.029 align:start position:0%
you can create as many identities as
they<00:05:16.360><c> won</c><00:05:17.160><c> and</c><00:05:18.270><c> this</c><00:05:19.270><c> should</c><00:05:19.570><c> be</c><00:05:19.600><c> I</c><00:05:20.050><c> would</c><00:05:21.010><c> say</c>

00:05:21.029 --> 00:05:21.039 align:start position:0%
they won and this should be I would say
 

00:05:21.039 --> 00:05:24.060 align:start position:0%
they won and this should be I would say
free<00:05:21.580><c> creating</c><00:05:22.419><c> an</c><00:05:22.539><c> identity</c><00:05:22.780><c> should</c><00:05:23.650><c> be</c><00:05:23.860><c> as</c>

00:05:24.060 --> 00:05:24.070 align:start position:0%
free creating an identity should be as
 

00:05:24.070 --> 00:05:27.689 align:start position:0%
free creating an identity should be as
easy<00:05:24.520><c> as</c><00:05:24.550><c> creating</c><00:05:25.210><c> a</c><00:05:25.840><c> normal</c><00:05:26.410><c> account</c><00:05:26.919><c> it</c>

00:05:27.689 --> 00:05:27.699 align:start position:0%
easy as creating a normal account it
 

00:05:27.699 --> 00:05:30.180 align:start position:0%
easy as creating a normal account it
does<00:05:27.940><c> not</c><00:05:28.120><c> need</c><00:05:28.360><c> to</c><00:05:28.690><c> have</c><00:05:29.080><c> any</c><00:05:29.199><c> gas</c><00:05:29.530><c> and</c><00:05:29.830><c> ether</c>

00:05:30.180 --> 00:05:30.190 align:start position:0%
does not need to have any gas and ether
 

00:05:30.190 --> 00:05:33.719 align:start position:0%
does not need to have any gas and ether
or<00:05:30.550><c> anything</c><00:05:30.820><c> like</c><00:05:31.210><c> that</c><00:05:31.240><c> and</c><00:05:32.280><c> we</c><00:05:33.280><c> say</c><00:05:33.490><c> that</c>

00:05:33.719 --> 00:05:33.729 align:start position:0%
or anything like that and we say that
 

00:05:33.729 --> 00:05:35.760 align:start position:0%
or anything like that and we say that
self-serving<00:05:34.450><c> because</c><00:05:34.870><c> you</c><00:05:35.260><c> full</c><00:05:35.530><c> control</c>

00:05:35.760 --> 00:05:35.770 align:start position:0%
self-serving because you full control
 

00:05:35.770 --> 00:05:40.050 align:start position:0%
self-serving because you full control
that<00:05:36.280><c> and</c><00:05:37.440><c> the</c><00:05:38.440><c> same</c><00:05:38.650><c> that</c><00:05:38.830><c> the</c><00:05:39.520><c> same</c><00:05:39.729><c> way</c><00:05:39.910><c> that</c>

00:05:40.050 --> 00:05:40.060 align:start position:0%
that and the same that the same way that
 

00:05:40.060 --> 00:05:41.670 align:start position:0%
that and the same that the same way that
happened<00:05:40.510><c> with</c><00:05:40.660><c> when</c><00:05:40.840><c> you</c><00:05:40.960><c> hold</c><00:05:41.200><c> a</c><00:05:41.349><c> normal</c>

00:05:41.670 --> 00:05:41.680 align:start position:0%
happened with when you hold a normal
 

00:05:41.680 --> 00:05:44.159 align:start position:0%
happened with when you hold a normal
account<00:05:42.010><c> in</c><00:05:42.340><c> Bitcoin</c><00:05:43.090><c> you</c><00:05:43.750><c> need</c><00:05:43.990><c> these</c>

00:05:44.159 --> 00:05:44.169 align:start position:0%
account in Bitcoin you need these
 

00:05:44.169 --> 00:05:48.300 align:start position:0%
account in Bitcoin you need these
responsibilities<00:05:45.130><c> of</c><00:05:45.310><c> keeping</c><00:05:45.910><c> the</c><00:05:46.030><c> keys</c><00:05:47.310><c> if</c>

00:05:48.300 --> 00:05:48.310 align:start position:0%
responsibilities of keeping the keys if
 

00:05:48.310 --> 00:05:50.370 align:start position:0%
responsibilities of keeping the keys if
you<00:05:48.729><c> lose</c><00:05:49.030><c> the</c><00:05:49.240><c> keys</c><00:05:49.450><c> in</c><00:05:49.690><c> some</c><00:05:49.870><c> way</c><00:05:50.020><c> you</c><00:05:50.080><c> can</c>

00:05:50.370 --> 00:05:50.380 align:start position:0%
you lose the keys in some way you can
 

00:05:50.380 --> 00:05:51.719 align:start position:0%
you lose the keys in some way you can
lose<00:05:50.560><c> the</c><00:05:50.710><c> responsibility</c><00:05:51.280><c> the</c><00:05:51.400><c> same</c><00:05:51.550><c> way</c>

00:05:51.719 --> 00:05:51.729 align:start position:0%
lose the responsibility the same way
 

00:05:51.729 --> 00:05:53.580 align:start position:0%
lose the responsibility the same way
that<00:05:51.910><c> in</c><00:05:52.060><c> Bitcoin</c><00:05:52.450><c> or</c><00:05:52.630><c> in</c><00:05:52.750><c> ether</c><00:05:52.930><c> you</c><00:05:53.080><c> if</c><00:05:53.380><c> you</c>

00:05:53.580 --> 00:05:53.590 align:start position:0%
that in Bitcoin or in ether you if you
 

00:05:53.590 --> 00:05:55.230 align:start position:0%
that in Bitcoin or in ether you if you
lose<00:05:53.710><c> the</c><00:05:53.860><c> keys</c><00:05:54.039><c> you</c><00:05:54.550><c> lose</c><00:05:54.729><c> that</c><00:05:54.940><c> you</c><00:05:55.210><c> lose</c>

00:05:55.230 --> 00:05:55.240 align:start position:0%
lose the keys you lose that you lose
 

00:05:55.240 --> 00:05:58.050 align:start position:0%
lose the keys you lose that you lose
that<00:05:55.630><c> so</c><00:05:56.080><c> because</c><00:05:56.470><c> this</c><00:05:56.680><c> responsibility</c><00:05:57.370><c> we</c>

00:05:58.050 --> 00:05:58.060 align:start position:0%
that so because this responsibility we
 

00:05:58.060 --> 00:06:00.379 align:start position:0%
that so because this responsibility we
need<00:05:58.240><c> to</c><00:05:58.360><c> work</c><00:05:58.570><c> a</c><00:05:58.840><c> lot</c><00:05:59.229><c> in</c><00:05:59.500><c> the</c><00:05:59.680><c> key</c><00:05:59.860><c> management</c>

00:06:00.379 --> 00:06:00.389 align:start position:0%
need to work a lot in the key management
 

00:06:00.389 --> 00:06:03.600 align:start position:0%
need to work a lot in the key management
ok<00:06:01.419><c> and</c><00:06:01.599><c> this</c><00:06:01.990><c> here</c><00:06:02.560><c> we</c><00:06:02.710><c> share</c><00:06:02.979><c> a</c><00:06:03.010><c> lot</c><00:06:03.370><c> of</c><00:06:03.400><c> the</c>

00:06:03.600 --> 00:06:03.610 align:start position:0%
ok and this here we share a lot of the
 

00:06:03.610 --> 00:06:08.279 align:start position:0%
ok and this here we share a lot of the
problems<00:06:04.060><c> that</c><00:06:04.240><c> any</c><00:06:04.419><c> wallet</c><00:06:04.930><c> have</c><00:06:06.539><c> here</c><00:06:07.539><c> as</c>

00:06:08.279 --> 00:06:08.289 align:start position:0%
problems that any wallet have here as
 

00:06:08.289 --> 00:06:10.020 align:start position:0%
problems that any wallet have here as
you<00:06:08.410><c> can</c><00:06:08.590><c> assume</c><00:06:08.889><c> as</c><00:06:09.039><c> you</c><00:06:09.280><c> can</c><00:06:09.430><c> imagine</c><00:06:09.669><c> the</c>

00:06:10.020 --> 00:06:10.030 align:start position:0%
you can assume as you can imagine the
 

00:06:10.030 --> 00:06:13.710 align:start position:0%
you can assume as you can imagine the
key<00:06:10.240><c> should</c><00:06:10.780><c> be</c><00:06:10.840><c> revocable</c><00:06:11.410><c> recoverable</c><00:06:12.720><c> we</c>

00:06:13.710 --> 00:06:13.720 align:start position:0%
key should be revocable recoverable we
 

00:06:13.720 --> 00:06:17.430 align:start position:0%
key should be revocable recoverable we
are<00:06:13.840><c> thinking</c><00:06:14.349><c> that</c><00:06:15.840><c> we</c><00:06:16.840><c> don't</c><00:06:16.990><c> want</c><00:06:17.169><c> the</c><00:06:17.289><c> keys</c>

00:06:17.430 --> 00:06:17.440 align:start position:0%
are thinking that we don't want the keys
 

00:06:17.440 --> 00:06:20.040 align:start position:0%
are thinking that we don't want the keys
to<00:06:17.500><c> go</c><00:06:17.979><c> around</c><00:06:18.370><c> that</c><00:06:18.639><c> belief</c><00:06:19.030><c> among</c><00:06:19.300><c> the</c><00:06:19.570><c> that</c>

00:06:20.040 --> 00:06:20.050 align:start position:0%
to go around that belief among the that
 

00:06:20.050 --> 00:06:22.440 align:start position:0%
to go around that belief among the that
leave<00:06:20.229><c> the</c><00:06:20.349><c> devices</c><00:06:20.860><c> we</c><00:06:21.340><c> are</c><00:06:21.430><c> sharing</c><00:06:21.700><c> a</c><00:06:21.970><c> lot</c>

00:06:22.440 --> 00:06:22.450 align:start position:0%
leave the devices we are sharing a lot
 

00:06:22.450 --> 00:06:24.060 align:start position:0%
leave the devices we are sharing a lot
of<00:06:22.630><c> the</c><00:06:22.750><c> concepts</c><00:06:23.169><c> and</c><00:06:23.410><c> we</c><00:06:23.560><c> are</c><00:06:23.710><c> a</c><00:06:23.740><c> fully</c>

00:06:24.060 --> 00:06:24.070 align:start position:0%
of the concepts and we are a fully
 

00:06:24.070 --> 00:06:26.520 align:start position:0%
of the concepts and we are a fully
alignment<00:06:24.580><c> with</c><00:06:25.030><c> I</c><00:06:25.450><c> don't</c><00:06:26.020><c> know</c><00:06:26.110><c> if</c><00:06:26.229><c> you</c><00:06:26.289><c> saw</c>

00:06:26.520 --> 00:06:26.530 align:start position:0%
alignment with I don't know if you saw
 

00:06:26.530 --> 00:06:28.260 align:start position:0%
alignment with I don't know if you saw
yesterday<00:06:26.830><c> the</c><00:06:27.130><c> Alexander's</c><00:06:27.789><c> are</c><00:06:28.030><c> a</c>

00:06:28.260 --> 00:06:28.270 align:start position:0%
yesterday the Alexander's are a
 

00:06:28.270 --> 00:06:31.770 align:start position:0%
yesterday the Alexander's are a
universal<00:06:29.080><c> login</c><00:06:30.300><c> we</c><00:06:31.300><c> work</c><00:06:31.450><c> in</c><00:06:31.660><c> that</c>

00:06:31.770 --> 00:06:31.780 align:start position:0%
universal login we work in that
 

00:06:31.780 --> 00:06:34.680 align:start position:0%
universal login we work in that
direction<00:06:31.990><c> one</c><00:06:32.830><c> keeper</c><00:06:33.310><c> application</c><00:06:34.000><c> so</c><00:06:34.510><c> the</c>

00:06:34.680 --> 00:06:34.690 align:start position:0%
direction one keeper application so the
 

00:06:34.690 --> 00:06:36.510 align:start position:0%
direction one keeper application so the
key<00:06:34.900><c> management</c><00:06:35.289><c> is</c><00:06:35.530><c> an</c><00:06:35.680><c> important</c><00:06:36.159><c> part</c><00:06:36.370><c> of</c>

00:06:36.510 --> 00:06:36.520 align:start position:0%
key management is an important part of
 

00:06:36.520 --> 00:06:38.779 align:start position:0%
key management is an important part of
these<00:06:37.000><c> of</c><00:06:37.270><c> this</c><00:06:37.510><c> project</c>

00:06:38.779 --> 00:06:38.789 align:start position:0%
these of this project
 

00:06:38.789 --> 00:06:42.439 align:start position:0%
these of this project
accessibility<00:06:39.749><c> I</c><00:06:39.960><c> think</c><00:06:40.830><c> we</c><00:06:41.669><c> want</c><00:06:41.849><c> to</c><00:06:41.999><c> create</c>

00:06:42.439 --> 00:06:42.449 align:start position:0%
accessibility I think we want to create
 

00:06:42.449 --> 00:06:45.409 align:start position:0%
accessibility I think we want to create
a<00:06:43.069><c> system</c><00:06:44.069><c> that's</c><00:06:44.460><c> made</c><00:06:44.849><c> that</c><00:06:45.210><c> goes</c>

00:06:45.409 --> 00:06:45.419 align:start position:0%
a system that's made that goes
 

00:06:45.419 --> 00:06:47.600 align:start position:0%
a system that's made that goes
mainstream<00:06:45.800><c> that</c><00:06:46.800><c> everybody</c><00:06:47.219><c> should</c><00:06:47.339><c> be</c><00:06:47.490><c> able</c>

00:06:47.600 --> 00:06:47.610 align:start position:0%
mainstream that everybody should be able
 

00:06:47.610 --> 00:06:51.320 align:start position:0%
mainstream that everybody should be able
to<00:06:47.999><c> use</c><00:06:48.150><c> it</c><00:06:48.360><c> so</c><00:06:48.870><c> be</c><00:06:49.020><c> easy</c><00:06:49.229><c> to</c><00:06:49.559><c> do</c><00:06:50.279><c> so</c><00:06:50.879><c> be</c><00:06:51.059><c> easy</c>

00:06:51.320 --> 00:06:51.330 align:start position:0%
to use it so be easy to do so be easy
 

00:06:51.330 --> 00:06:55.040 align:start position:0%
to use it so be easy to do so be easy
for<00:06:52.139><c> anybody</c><00:06:52.529><c> to</c><00:06:52.800><c> start</c><00:06:53.839><c> working</c><00:06:54.839><c> in</c><00:06:54.960><c> the</c>

00:06:55.040 --> 00:06:55.050 align:start position:0%
for anybody to start working in the
 

00:06:55.050 --> 00:06:58.070 align:start position:0%
for anybody to start working in the
system<00:06:55.400><c> this</c><00:06:56.400><c> is</c><00:06:56.550><c> for</c><00:06:56.729><c> example</c><00:06:57.180><c> and</c><00:06:57.419><c> I'm</c><00:06:57.809><c> going</c>

00:06:58.070 --> 00:06:58.080 align:start position:0%
system this is for example and I'm going
 

00:06:58.080 --> 00:06:59.839 align:start position:0%
system this is for example and I'm going
and<00:06:58.319><c> start</c><00:06:58.770><c> into</c><00:06:59.009><c> entering</c><00:06:59.370><c> a</c><00:06:59.430><c> little</c><00:06:59.699><c> bit</c>

00:06:59.839 --> 00:06:59.849 align:start position:0%
and start into entering a little bit
 

00:06:59.849 --> 00:07:02.119 align:start position:0%
and start into entering a little bit
technical<00:07:00.089><c> how</c><00:07:00.930><c> we</c><00:07:01.080><c> are</c><00:07:01.199><c> doing</c><00:07:01.319><c> we</c><00:07:01.860><c> are</c><00:07:01.919><c> using</c>

00:07:02.119 --> 00:07:02.129 align:start position:0%
technical how we are doing we are using
 

00:07:02.129 --> 00:07:03.619 align:start position:0%
technical how we are doing we are using
this<00:07:02.430><c> when</c><00:07:02.699><c> you</c><00:07:02.849><c> are</c><00:07:02.879><c> creating</c><00:07:03.300><c> an</c><00:07:03.389><c> identity</c>

00:07:03.619 --> 00:07:03.629 align:start position:0%
this when you are creating an identity
 

00:07:03.629 --> 00:07:05.329 align:start position:0%
this when you are creating an identity
mainly<00:07:04.469><c> what</c><00:07:04.620><c> you</c><00:07:04.710><c> are</c><00:07:04.800><c> doing</c><00:07:04.979><c> is</c><00:07:05.129><c> creating</c>

00:07:05.329 --> 00:07:05.339 align:start position:0%
mainly what you are doing is creating
 

00:07:05.339 --> 00:07:10.309 align:start position:0%
mainly what you are doing is creating
this<00:07:06.199><c> contractual</c><00:07:07.199><c> or</c><00:07:07.379><c> if</c><00:07:07.589><c> this</c><00:07:09.319><c> identity</c>

00:07:10.309 --> 00:07:10.319 align:start position:0%
this contractual or if this identity
 

00:07:10.319 --> 00:07:12.739 align:start position:0%
this contractual or if this identity
contract<00:07:10.800><c> that</c><00:07:11.309><c> you</c><00:07:11.520><c> don't</c><00:07:11.759><c> actually</c><00:07:12.419><c> deploy</c>

00:07:12.739 --> 00:07:12.749 align:start position:0%
contract that you don't actually deploy
 

00:07:12.749 --> 00:07:15.219 align:start position:0%
contract that you don't actually deploy
when<00:07:13.020><c> you</c><00:07:13.110><c> are</c><00:07:13.229><c> creating</c><00:07:13.649><c> that</c><00:07:13.800><c> identity</c><00:07:14.189><c> but</c>

00:07:15.219 --> 00:07:15.229 align:start position:0%
when you are creating that identity but
 

00:07:15.229 --> 00:07:18.350 align:start position:0%
when you are creating that identity but
once<00:07:16.229><c> you</c><00:07:16.379><c> create</c><00:07:16.680><c> this</c><00:07:16.889><c> contract</c><00:07:17.610><c> that's</c><00:07:18.089><c> not</c>

00:07:18.350 --> 00:07:18.360 align:start position:0%
once you create this contract that's not
 

00:07:18.360 --> 00:07:20.659 align:start position:0%
once you create this contract that's not
deployed<00:07:18.719><c> yet</c><00:07:19.139><c> they</c><00:07:19.919><c> already</c><00:07:20.219><c> have</c><00:07:20.520><c> an</c>

00:07:20.659 --> 00:07:20.669 align:start position:0%
deployed yet they already have an
 

00:07:20.669 --> 00:07:21.249 align:start position:0%
deployed yet they already have an
address

00:07:21.249 --> 00:07:21.259 align:start position:0%
address
 

00:07:21.259 --> 00:07:24.290 align:start position:0%
address
so<00:07:22.259><c> these</c><00:07:22.469><c> already</c><00:07:22.860><c> have</c><00:07:23.039><c> an</c><00:07:23.189><c> address</c><00:07:23.699><c> so</c><00:07:24.059><c> this</c>

00:07:24.290 --> 00:07:24.300 align:start position:0%
so these already have an address so this
 

00:07:24.300 --> 00:07:26.899 align:start position:0%
so these already have an address so this
identity<00:07:24.809><c> is</c><00:07:24.960><c> created</c><00:07:25.529><c> already</c><00:07:26.009><c> so</c><00:07:26.490><c> you</c><00:07:26.550><c> the</c>

00:07:26.899 --> 00:07:26.909 align:start position:0%
identity is created already so you the
 

00:07:26.909 --> 00:07:28.549 align:start position:0%
identity is created already so you the
people<00:07:27.180><c> can</c><00:07:27.330><c> start</c><00:07:27.659><c> doing</c><00:07:27.779><c> claims</c><00:07:28.169><c> on</c><00:07:28.409><c> that</c>

00:07:28.549 --> 00:07:28.559 align:start position:0%
people can start doing claims on that
 

00:07:28.559 --> 00:07:31.969 align:start position:0%
people can start doing claims on that
and<00:07:29.370><c> all</c><00:07:29.669><c> that</c><00:07:29.879><c> without</c><00:07:30.270><c> the</c><00:07:30.419><c> user</c><00:07:30.629><c> having</c><00:07:30.979><c> to</c>

00:07:31.969 --> 00:07:31.979 align:start position:0%
and all that without the user having to
 

00:07:31.979 --> 00:07:34.219 align:start position:0%
and all that without the user having to
do<00:07:32.279><c> anything</c><00:07:32.580><c> else</c><00:07:32.909><c> that</c><00:07:33.479><c> just</c><00:07:33.689><c> running</c><00:07:34.110><c> at</c>

00:07:34.219 --> 00:07:34.229 align:start position:0%
do anything else that just running at
 

00:07:34.229 --> 00:07:36.709 align:start position:0%
do anything else that just running at
random<00:07:34.620><c> dies</c><00:07:34.800><c> at</c><00:07:35.279><c> some</c><00:07:35.759><c> point</c><00:07:35.999><c> and</c><00:07:36.210><c> creating</c>

00:07:36.709 --> 00:07:36.719 align:start position:0%
random dies at some point and creating
 

00:07:36.719 --> 00:07:41.899 align:start position:0%
random dies at some point and creating
that<00:07:36.809><c> identity</c><00:07:39.800><c> scalability</c><00:07:40.800><c> and</c><00:07:41.309><c> here</c><00:07:41.789><c> is</c>

00:07:41.899 --> 00:07:41.909 align:start position:0%
that identity scalability and here is
 

00:07:41.909 --> 00:07:43.820 align:start position:0%
that identity scalability and here is
what<00:07:42.089><c> we</c><00:07:42.240><c> are</c><00:07:42.330><c> going</c><00:07:42.479><c> to</c><00:07:42.569><c> go</c><00:07:42.779><c> deep</c><00:07:43.020><c> we</c><00:07:43.529><c> want</c><00:07:43.740><c> a</c>

00:07:43.820 --> 00:07:43.830 align:start position:0%
what we are going to go deep we want a
 

00:07:43.830 --> 00:07:45.589 align:start position:0%
what we are going to go deep we want a
system<00:07:44.069><c> where</c><00:07:44.459><c> everybody</c><00:07:44.729><c> can</c><00:07:45.060><c> create</c><00:07:45.449><c> as</c>

00:07:45.589 --> 00:07:45.599 align:start position:0%
system where everybody can create as
 

00:07:45.599 --> 00:07:48.050 align:start position:0%
system where everybody can create as
many<00:07:45.629><c> identities</c><00:07:46.229><c> as</c><00:07:46.469><c> they</c><00:07:46.620><c> want</c><00:07:46.860><c> but</c><00:07:47.069><c> we</c><00:07:47.849><c> want</c>

00:07:48.050 --> 00:07:48.060 align:start position:0%
many identities as they want but we want
 

00:07:48.060 --> 00:07:50.719 align:start position:0%
many identities as they want but we want
a<00:07:48.209><c> system</c><00:07:48.419><c> also</c><00:07:48.870><c> that</c><00:07:49.589><c> anybody</c><00:07:50.009><c> can</c><00:07:50.219><c> create</c><00:07:50.430><c> as</c>

00:07:50.719 --> 00:07:50.729 align:start position:0%
a system also that anybody can create as
 

00:07:50.729 --> 00:07:54.050 align:start position:0%
a system also that anybody can create as
many<00:07:50.759><c> claims</c><00:07:51.300><c> as</c><00:07:51.599><c> they</c><00:07:51.930><c> want</c><00:07:52.229><c> and</c><00:07:52.789><c> to</c><00:07:53.789><c> scale</c>

00:07:54.050 --> 00:07:54.060 align:start position:0%
many claims as they want and to scale
 

00:07:54.060 --> 00:07:55.939 align:start position:0%
many claims as they want and to scale
that<00:07:54.270><c> in</c><00:07:54.539><c> a</c><00:07:54.659><c> global</c><00:07:55.050><c> basis</c><00:07:55.379><c> so</c><00:07:55.529><c> that</c><00:07:55.680><c> we</c><00:07:55.830><c> are</c>

00:07:55.939 --> 00:07:55.949 align:start position:0%
that in a global basis so that we are
 

00:07:55.949 --> 00:07:57.949 align:start position:0%
that in a global basis so that we are
there<00:07:56.219><c> are</c><00:07:56.310><c> millions</c><00:07:57.149><c> of</c><00:07:57.240><c> claims</c><00:07:57.449><c> in</c><00:07:57.779><c> the</c>

00:07:57.949 --> 00:07:57.959 align:start position:0%
there are millions of claims in the
 

00:07:57.959 --> 00:08:00.559 align:start position:0%
there are millions of claims in the
world<00:07:58.370><c> we</c><00:07:59.370><c> need</c><00:07:59.550><c> to</c><00:07:59.669><c> apply</c><00:07:59.909><c> some</c><00:07:59.939><c> techniques</c>

00:08:00.559 --> 00:08:00.569 align:start position:0%
world we need to apply some techniques
 

00:08:00.569 --> 00:08:03.619 align:start position:0%
world we need to apply some techniques
that<00:08:00.959><c> I'm</c><00:08:01.080><c> going</c><00:08:01.289><c> to</c><00:08:01.379><c> describe</c><00:08:01.680><c> next</c><00:08:02.629><c> to</c>

00:08:03.619 --> 00:08:03.629 align:start position:0%
that I'm going to describe next to
 

00:08:03.629 --> 00:08:09.559 align:start position:0%
that I'm going to describe next to
explain<00:08:03.959><c> that</c><00:08:04.909><c> how</c><00:08:05.909><c> we</c><00:08:08.089><c> anchored</c><00:08:09.089><c> the</c><00:08:09.270><c> claims</c>

00:08:09.559 --> 00:08:09.569 align:start position:0%
explain that how we anchored the claims
 

00:08:09.569 --> 00:08:14.179 align:start position:0%
explain that how we anchored the claims
in<00:08:09.959><c> the</c><00:08:10.319><c> blockchain</c><00:08:12.709><c> what</c><00:08:13.709><c> we</c><00:08:13.889><c> are</c><00:08:14.009><c> doing</c>

00:08:14.179 --> 00:08:14.189 align:start position:0%
in the blockchain what we are doing
 

00:08:14.189 --> 00:08:18.439 align:start position:0%
in the blockchain what we are doing
mainly<00:08:14.459><c> is</c><00:08:15.709><c> if</c><00:08:16.709><c> I</c><00:08:16.949><c> want</c><00:08:17.219><c> to</c><00:08:17.339><c> create</c><00:08:17.580><c> many</c>

00:08:18.439 --> 00:08:18.449 align:start position:0%
mainly is if I want to create many
 

00:08:18.449 --> 00:08:21.139 align:start position:0%
mainly is if I want to create many
claims<00:08:18.809><c> I</c><00:08:19.199><c> put</c><00:08:20.129><c> all</c><00:08:20.279><c> those</c><00:08:20.490><c> claims</c><00:08:20.789><c> in</c><00:08:21.059><c> a</c>

00:08:21.139 --> 00:08:21.149 align:start position:0%
claims I put all those claims in a
 

00:08:21.149 --> 00:08:23.570 align:start position:0%
claims I put all those claims in a
database<00:08:21.419><c> I</c><00:08:21.839><c> take</c><00:08:22.709><c> this</c><00:08:22.830><c> database</c><00:08:23.129><c> I</c>

00:08:23.570 --> 00:08:23.580 align:start position:0%
database I take this database I
 

00:08:23.580 --> 00:08:25.579 align:start position:0%
database I take this database I
construct<00:08:24.209><c> a</c><00:08:24.330><c> miracle</c><00:08:24.689><c> tree</c><00:08:24.930><c> of</c><00:08:25.139><c> that</c>

00:08:25.579 --> 00:08:25.589 align:start position:0%
construct a miracle tree of that
 

00:08:25.589 --> 00:08:28.040 align:start position:0%
construct a miracle tree of that
database<00:08:25.889><c> and</c><00:08:26.339><c> I</c><00:08:26.879><c> just</c><00:08:27.209><c> publish</c><00:08:27.659><c> with</c><00:08:28.020><c> a</c>

00:08:28.040 --> 00:08:28.050 align:start position:0%
database and I just publish with a
 

00:08:28.050 --> 00:08:31.399 align:start position:0%
database and I just publish with a
transaction<00:08:28.770><c> the</c><00:08:29.459><c> root</c><00:08:29.669><c> of</c><00:08:29.939><c> that</c><00:08:30.599><c> of</c><00:08:31.169><c> that</c>

00:08:31.399 --> 00:08:31.409 align:start position:0%
transaction the root of that of that
 

00:08:31.409 --> 00:08:36.050 align:start position:0%
transaction the root of that of that
miracle<00:08:32.099><c> tree</c><00:08:32.459><c> in</c><00:08:32.639><c> the</c><00:08:33.469><c> chain</c><00:08:34.819><c> every</c><00:08:35.819><c> time</c>

00:08:36.050 --> 00:08:36.060 align:start position:0%
miracle tree in the chain every time
 

00:08:36.060 --> 00:08:39.469 align:start position:0%
miracle tree in the chain every time
that<00:08:36.510><c> I</c><00:08:36.750><c> have</c><00:08:36.839><c> new</c><00:08:37.560><c> claims</c><00:08:37.979><c> I</c><00:08:38.339><c> have</c><00:08:38.789><c> changes</c><00:08:39.300><c> I</c>

00:08:39.469 --> 00:08:39.479 align:start position:0%
that I have new claims I have changes I
 

00:08:39.479 --> 00:08:42.170 align:start position:0%
that I have new claims I have changes I
could<00:08:40.110><c> change</c><00:08:40.829><c> the</c><00:08:41.099><c> route</c><00:08:41.310><c> or</c><00:08:41.519><c> I</c><00:08:41.579><c> will</c><00:08:41.940><c> change</c>

00:08:42.170 --> 00:08:42.180 align:start position:0%
could change the route or I will change
 

00:08:42.180 --> 00:08:45.650 align:start position:0%
could change the route or I will change
the<00:08:42.389><c> route</c><00:08:42.569><c> of</c><00:08:42.719><c> the</c><00:08:43.110><c> database</c><00:08:43.500><c> as</c><00:08:44.389><c> one</c><00:08:45.389><c> chain</c>

00:08:45.650 --> 00:08:45.660 align:start position:0%
the route of the database as one chain
 

00:08:45.660 --> 00:08:48.380 align:start position:0%
the route of the database as one chain
as<00:08:45.839><c> you</c><00:08:46.170><c> can</c><00:08:46.319><c> see</c><00:08:46.560><c> this</c><00:08:46.980><c> is</c><00:08:47.160><c> scales</c><00:08:47.640><c> very</c><00:08:47.910><c> well</c>

00:08:48.380 --> 00:08:48.390 align:start position:0%
as you can see this is scales very well
 

00:08:48.390 --> 00:08:52.060 align:start position:0%
as you can see this is scales very well
for<00:08:50.269><c> identities</c><00:08:51.269><c> that</c><00:08:51.720><c> may</c>

00:08:52.060 --> 00:08:52.070 align:start position:0%
for identities that may
 

00:08:52.070 --> 00:08:56.290 align:start position:0%
for identities that may
a<00:08:52.100><c> lot</c><00:08:52.460><c> of</c><00:08:52.640><c> claims</c><00:08:53.410><c> example</c><00:08:54.410><c> a</c><00:08:54.620><c> government</c><00:08:55.610><c> in</c>

00:08:56.290 --> 00:08:56.300 align:start position:0%
a lot of claims example a government in
 

00:08:56.300 --> 00:08:59.770 align:start position:0%
a lot of claims example a government in
the<00:08:56.420><c> government</c><00:08:56.900><c> there</c><00:08:57.350><c> are</c><00:08:57.530><c> many</c><00:08:58.780><c> things</c>

00:08:59.770 --> 00:08:59.780 align:start position:0%
the government there are many things
 

00:08:59.780 --> 00:09:01.900 align:start position:0%
the government there are many things
that<00:09:00.080><c> happen</c><00:09:00.650><c> in</c><00:09:00.770><c> a</c><00:09:00.860><c> country</c><00:09:01.250><c> there</c><00:09:01.490><c> is</c><00:09:01.550><c> people</c>

00:09:01.900 --> 00:09:01.910 align:start position:0%
that happen in a country there is people
 

00:09:01.910 --> 00:09:04.300 align:start position:0%
that happen in a country there is people
does<00:09:02.060><c> get</c><00:09:02.300><c> born</c><00:09:02.600><c> people</c><00:09:03.260><c> that</c><00:09:03.380><c> die</c><00:09:03.560><c> people</c>

00:09:04.300 --> 00:09:04.310 align:start position:0%
does get born people that die people
 

00:09:04.310 --> 00:09:06.460 align:start position:0%
does get born people that die people
that<00:09:04.460><c> get</c><00:09:04.670><c> married</c><00:09:05.000><c> people</c><00:09:05.570><c> that</c><00:09:05.720><c> change</c>

00:09:06.460 --> 00:09:06.470 align:start position:0%
that get married people that change
 

00:09:06.470 --> 00:09:09.010 align:start position:0%
that get married people that change
their<00:09:06.650><c> addresses</c><00:09:07.040><c> so</c><00:09:07.790><c> the</c><00:09:07.970><c> government</c><00:09:08.420><c> just</c>

00:09:09.010 --> 00:09:09.020 align:start position:0%
their addresses so the government just
 

00:09:09.020 --> 00:09:12.460 align:start position:0%
their addresses so the government just
with<00:09:09.230><c> a</c><00:09:09.260><c> single</c><00:09:09.640><c> transaction</c><00:09:10.640><c> per</c><00:09:11.270><c> day</c><00:09:11.470><c> could</c>

00:09:12.460 --> 00:09:12.470 align:start position:0%
with a single transaction per day could
 

00:09:12.470 --> 00:09:17.350 align:start position:0%
with a single transaction per day could
abate<00:09:13.040><c> the</c><00:09:13.910><c> full</c><00:09:14.150><c> database</c><00:09:15.880><c> if</c><00:09:16.880><c> you</c><00:09:17.120><c> want</c>

00:09:17.350 --> 00:09:17.360 align:start position:0%
abate the full database if you want
 

00:09:17.360 --> 00:09:19.840 align:start position:0%
abate the full database if you want
instead<00:09:18.140><c> of</c><00:09:18.320><c> one</c><00:09:18.500><c> per</c><00:09:18.650><c> day</c><00:09:18.680><c> one</c><00:09:19.160><c> per</c><00:09:19.340><c> hour</c><00:09:19.490><c> or</c>

00:09:19.840 --> 00:09:19.850 align:start position:0%
instead of one per day one per hour or
 

00:09:19.850 --> 00:09:20.980 align:start position:0%
instead of one per day one per hour or
one<00:09:20.000><c> every</c><00:09:20.270><c> five</c><00:09:20.510><c> minutes</c>

00:09:20.980 --> 00:09:20.990 align:start position:0%
one every five minutes
 

00:09:20.990 --> 00:09:22.990 align:start position:0%
one every five minutes
but<00:09:21.530><c> this</c><00:09:21.770><c> is</c><00:09:21.920><c> quite</c><00:09:22.220><c> cheap</c><00:09:22.580><c> for</c><00:09:22.880><c> the</c>

00:09:22.990 --> 00:09:23.000 align:start position:0%
but this is quite cheap for the
 

00:09:23.000 --> 00:09:25.840 align:start position:0%
but this is quite cheap for the
government<00:09:23.450><c> just</c><00:09:23.870><c> to</c><00:09:23.990><c> keep</c><00:09:24.440><c> a</c><00:09:24.740><c> millions</c><00:09:25.580><c> of</c>

00:09:25.840 --> 00:09:25.850 align:start position:0%
government just to keep a millions of
 

00:09:25.850 --> 00:09:29.260 align:start position:0%
government just to keep a millions of
claims<00:09:26.210><c> database</c><00:09:27.130><c> okay</c><00:09:28.130><c> but</c><00:09:28.610><c> what</c><00:09:28.790><c> happens</c>

00:09:29.260 --> 00:09:29.270 align:start position:0%
claims database okay but what happens
 

00:09:29.270 --> 00:09:32.560 align:start position:0%
claims database okay but what happens
when<00:09:29.990><c> an</c><00:09:30.290><c> individual</c><00:09:31.130><c> user</c><00:09:31.370><c> a</c><00:09:31.760><c> normal</c><00:09:32.330><c> user</c>

00:09:32.560 --> 00:09:32.570 align:start position:0%
when an individual user a normal user
 

00:09:32.570 --> 00:09:35.530 align:start position:0%
when an individual user a normal user
just<00:09:33.230><c> wants</c><00:09:33.470><c> to</c><00:09:33.620><c> do</c><00:09:33.740><c> one</c><00:09:34.550><c> two</c><00:09:34.850><c> three</c><00:09:35.180><c> ten</c>

00:09:35.530 --> 00:09:35.540 align:start position:0%
just wants to do one two three ten
 

00:09:35.540 --> 00:09:39.390 align:start position:0%
just wants to do one two three ten
transactions<00:09:36.230><c> per</c><00:09:36.410><c> day</c><00:09:36.590><c> should</c><00:09:37.030><c> they</c><00:09:38.030><c> do</c><00:09:38.230><c> pen</c>

00:09:39.390 --> 00:09:39.400 align:start position:0%
transactions per day should they do pen
 

00:09:39.400 --> 00:09:41.650 align:start position:0%
transactions per day should they do pen
transactions<00:09:40.400><c> should</c><00:09:40.460><c> they</c><00:09:40.820><c> do</c><00:09:40.880><c> ten</c>

00:09:41.650 --> 00:09:41.660 align:start position:0%
transactions should they do ten
 

00:09:41.660 --> 00:09:43.660 align:start position:0%
transactions should they do ten
transactions<00:09:42.320><c> if</c><00:09:42.680><c> they</c><00:09:43.160><c> want</c><00:09:43.370><c> to</c><00:09:43.430><c> make</c><00:09:43.640><c> just</c>

00:09:43.660 --> 00:09:43.670 align:start position:0%
transactions if they want to make just
 

00:09:43.670 --> 00:09:47.260 align:start position:0%
transactions if they want to make just
ten<00:09:44.180><c> claims</c><00:09:44.450><c> and</c><00:09:45.380><c> here</c><00:09:45.830><c> is</c><00:09:45.950><c> when</c><00:09:46.700><c> we</c><00:09:46.730><c> introduce</c>

00:09:47.260 --> 00:09:47.270 align:start position:0%
ten claims and here is when we introduce
 

00:09:47.270 --> 00:09:48.520 align:start position:0%
ten claims and here is when we introduce
the<00:09:47.480><c> indirect</c><00:09:48.050><c> claims</c>

00:09:48.520 --> 00:09:48.530 align:start position:0%
the indirect claims
 

00:09:48.530 --> 00:09:51.040 align:start position:0%
the indirect claims
what's<00:09:49.250><c> the</c><00:09:49.430><c> indirect</c><00:09:49.790><c> claims</c><00:09:50.030><c> here</c><00:09:50.870><c> we</c>

00:09:51.040 --> 00:09:51.050 align:start position:0%
what's the indirect claims here we
 

00:09:51.050 --> 00:09:55.750 align:start position:0%
what's the indirect claims here we
introduce<00:09:51.170><c> a</c><00:09:51.710><c> relay</c><00:09:52.600><c> so</c><00:09:53.600><c> when</c><00:09:54.170><c> a</c><00:09:54.500><c> user</c><00:09:54.890><c> wants</c>

00:09:55.750 --> 00:09:55.760 align:start position:0%
introduce a relay so when a user wants
 

00:09:55.760 --> 00:09:58.660 align:start position:0%
introduce a relay so when a user wants
to<00:09:55.820><c> create</c><00:09:56.150><c> a</c><00:09:56.480><c> claim</c><00:09:56.870><c> let</c><00:09:57.770><c> me</c><00:09:57.890><c> for</c><00:09:58.220><c> example</c>

00:09:58.660 --> 00:09:58.670 align:start position:0%
to create a claim let me for example
 

00:09:58.670 --> 00:10:01.990 align:start position:0%
to create a claim let me for example
saying<00:09:58.910><c> okay</c><00:09:59.690><c> I</c><00:10:00.140><c> like</c><00:10:00.890><c> this</c><00:10:01.040><c> picture</c><00:10:01.310><c> okay</c>

00:10:01.990 --> 00:10:02.000 align:start position:0%
saying okay I like this picture okay
 

00:10:02.000 --> 00:10:03.760 align:start position:0%
saying okay I like this picture okay
this<00:10:02.210><c> is</c><00:10:02.330><c> a</c><00:10:02.360><c> claim</c><00:10:02.630><c> that</c><00:10:02.720><c> I</c><00:10:02.840><c> want</c><00:10:03.020><c> to</c><00:10:03.110><c> do</c><00:10:03.200><c> but</c>

00:10:03.760 --> 00:10:03.770 align:start position:0%
this is a claim that I want to do but
 

00:10:03.770 --> 00:10:06.190 align:start position:0%
this is a claim that I want to do but
instead<00:10:04.190><c> of</c><00:10:04.400><c> creating</c><00:10:04.760><c> a</c><00:10:05.200><c> transaction</c>

00:10:06.190 --> 00:10:06.200 align:start position:0%
instead of creating a transaction
 

00:10:06.200 --> 00:10:09.070 align:start position:0%
instead of creating a transaction
abating<00:10:06.980><c> my</c><00:10:07.130><c> route</c><00:10:07.430><c> of</c><00:10:07.640><c> claims</c><00:10:07.970><c> what</c><00:10:08.930><c> times</c>

00:10:09.070 --> 00:10:09.080 align:start position:0%
abating my route of claims what times
 

00:10:09.080 --> 00:10:11.320 align:start position:0%
abating my route of claims what times
what<00:10:09.590><c> I</c><00:10:09.650><c> do</c><00:10:09.770><c> is</c><00:10:10.100><c> I'm</c><00:10:10.280><c> telling</c><00:10:10.670><c> to</c><00:10:10.700><c> our</c><00:10:10.970><c> layer</c>

00:10:11.320 --> 00:10:11.330 align:start position:0%
what I do is I'm telling to our layer
 

00:10:11.330 --> 00:10:14.230 align:start position:0%
what I do is I'm telling to our layer
let's<00:10:12.080><c> think</c><00:10:12.350><c> for</c><00:10:12.620><c> a</c><00:10:13.520><c> moment</c><00:10:13.580><c> that</c><00:10:13.880><c> this</c><00:10:14.060><c> is</c><00:10:14.120><c> a</c>

00:10:14.230 --> 00:10:14.240 align:start position:0%
let's think for a moment that this is a
 

00:10:14.240 --> 00:10:15.280 align:start position:0%
let's think for a moment that this is a
trusted<00:10:14.660><c> relay</c>

00:10:15.280 --> 00:10:15.290 align:start position:0%
trusted relay
 

00:10:15.290 --> 00:10:16.720 align:start position:0%
trusted relay
we<00:10:15.800><c> will</c><00:10:15.890><c> see</c><00:10:16.100><c> that</c><00:10:16.250><c> that</c><00:10:16.430><c> that's</c><00:10:16.550><c> not</c>

00:10:16.720 --> 00:10:16.730 align:start position:0%
we will see that that that's not
 

00:10:16.730 --> 00:10:18.910 align:start position:0%
we will see that that that's not
necessary<00:10:17.360><c> necessarily</c><00:10:17.960><c> but</c><00:10:18.560><c> if</c><00:10:18.710><c> it's</c><00:10:18.860><c> a</c>

00:10:18.910 --> 00:10:18.920 align:start position:0%
necessary necessarily but if it's a
 

00:10:18.920 --> 00:10:20.470 align:start position:0%
necessary necessarily but if it's a
trusted<00:10:19.250><c> layer</c><00:10:19.490><c> and</c><00:10:19.760><c> telling</c><00:10:20.030><c> to</c><00:10:20.150><c> the</c><00:10:20.240><c> relay</c>

00:10:20.470 --> 00:10:20.480 align:start position:0%
trusted layer and telling to the relay
 

00:10:20.480 --> 00:10:24.340 align:start position:0%
trusted layer and telling to the relay
er<00:10:20.510><c> a</c><00:10:20.830><c> relay</c><00:10:21.830><c> er</c><00:10:21.860><c> I</c><00:10:22.250><c> want</c><00:10:23.210><c> to</c><00:10:23.360><c> say</c><00:10:23.570><c> I</c><00:10:23.840><c> want</c><00:10:24.170><c> to</c>

00:10:24.340 --> 00:10:24.350 align:start position:0%
er a relay er I want to say I want to
 

00:10:24.350 --> 00:10:27.640 align:start position:0%
er a relay er I want to say I want to
claim<00:10:24.590><c> that</c><00:10:25.490><c> I</c><00:10:25.790><c> like</c><00:10:26.270><c> this</c><00:10:26.480><c> picture</c><00:10:26.690><c> so</c><00:10:27.470><c> the</c>

00:10:27.640 --> 00:10:27.650 align:start position:0%
claim that I like this picture so the
 

00:10:27.650 --> 00:10:31.330 align:start position:0%
claim that I like this picture so the
relay<00:10:28.270><c> what</c><00:10:29.270><c> could</c><00:10:29.480><c> say</c><00:10:29.720><c> you</c><00:10:30.200><c> say</c><00:10:30.470><c> Oh</c><00:10:30.740><c> Jordi</c>

00:10:31.330 --> 00:10:31.340 align:start position:0%
relay what could say you say Oh Jordi
 

00:10:31.340 --> 00:10:34.560 align:start position:0%
relay what could say you say Oh Jordi
makes<00:10:32.240><c> a</c><00:10:32.420><c> claim</c><00:10:32.660><c> that</c><00:10:32.960><c> says</c><00:10:33.170><c> Jordi</c><00:10:33.740><c> is</c><00:10:33.770><c> saying</c>

00:10:34.560 --> 00:10:34.570 align:start position:0%
makes a claim that says Jordi is saying
 

00:10:34.570 --> 00:10:38.020 align:start position:0%
makes a claim that says Jordi is saying
that<00:10:35.570><c> he</c><00:10:36.170><c> likes</c><00:10:36.410><c> that</c><00:10:36.710><c> picture</c><00:10:37.190><c> okay</c><00:10:37.820><c> this</c>

00:10:38.020 --> 00:10:38.030 align:start position:0%
that he likes that picture okay this
 

00:10:38.030 --> 00:10:40.210 align:start position:0%
that he likes that picture okay this
would<00:10:38.180><c> be</c><00:10:38.300><c> an</c><00:10:38.420><c> indirect</c><00:10:38.780><c> claim</c><00:10:38.990><c> but</c><00:10:39.830><c> instead</c>

00:10:40.210 --> 00:10:40.220 align:start position:0%
would be an indirect claim but instead
 

00:10:40.220 --> 00:10:43.150 align:start position:0%
would be an indirect claim but instead
of<00:10:40.400><c> doing</c><00:10:40.670><c> claim</c><00:10:40.970><c> by</c><00:10:41.150><c> claim</c><00:10:41.770><c> what</c><00:10:42.770><c> I'm</c><00:10:42.920><c> really</c>

00:10:43.150 --> 00:10:43.160 align:start position:0%
of doing claim by claim what I'm really
 

00:10:43.160 --> 00:10:45.880 align:start position:0%
of doing claim by claim what I'm really
asking<00:10:43.550><c> to</c><00:10:44.030><c> the</c><00:10:44.150><c> relay</c><00:10:44.390><c> is</c><00:10:44.870><c> just</c><00:10:45.290><c> to</c><00:10:45.410><c> update</c><00:10:45.680><c> my</c>

00:10:45.880 --> 00:10:45.890 align:start position:0%
asking to the relay is just to update my
 

00:10:45.890 --> 00:10:48.190 align:start position:0%
asking to the relay is just to update my
wrote<00:10:46.130><c> my</c><00:10:46.310><c> route</c><00:10:46.580><c> of</c><00:10:46.820><c> claims</c><00:10:47.210><c> a</c><00:10:47.510><c> relay</c><00:10:48.170><c> er</c>

00:10:48.190 --> 00:10:48.200 align:start position:0%
wrote my route of claims a relay er
 

00:10:48.200 --> 00:10:51.310 align:start position:0%
wrote my route of claims a relay er
please<00:10:48.910><c> update</c><00:10:49.910><c> my</c><00:10:50.090><c> fruit</c><00:10:50.300><c> of</c><00:10:50.450><c> claims</c><00:10:50.690><c> so</c><00:10:51.200><c> the</c>

00:10:51.310 --> 00:10:51.320 align:start position:0%
please update my fruit of claims so the
 

00:10:51.320 --> 00:10:53.530 align:start position:0%
please update my fruit of claims so the
relay<00:10:51.560><c> er</c><00:10:51.590><c> just</c><00:10:52.280><c> take</c><00:10:52.520><c> that</c><00:10:52.730><c> route</c><00:10:53.120><c> of</c><00:10:53.270><c> claims</c>

00:10:53.530 --> 00:10:53.540 align:start position:0%
relay er just take that route of claims
 

00:10:53.540 --> 00:10:56.620 align:start position:0%
relay er just take that route of claims
and<00:10:53.750><c> publish</c><00:10:54.440><c> as</c><00:10:54.740><c> a</c><00:10:54.980><c> claim</c><00:10:55.370><c> inside</c><00:10:56.240><c> that</c><00:10:56.420><c> and</c>

00:10:56.620 --> 00:10:56.630 align:start position:0%
and publish as a claim inside that and
 

00:10:56.630 --> 00:10:59.680 align:start position:0%
and publish as a claim inside that and
you<00:10:56.690><c> see</c><00:10:56.870><c> this</c><00:10:57.310><c> miracle</c><00:10:58.310><c> tree</c><00:10:58.700><c> that</c><00:10:59.210><c> depends</c>

00:10:59.680 --> 00:10:59.690 align:start position:0%
you see this miracle tree that depends
 

00:10:59.690 --> 00:11:01.480 align:start position:0%
you see this miracle tree that depends
on<00:10:59.780><c> the</c><00:10:59.900><c> other</c><00:11:00.050><c> on</c><00:11:00.410><c> the</c><00:11:00.860><c> other</c><00:11:00.980><c> America</c><00:11:01.310><c> tree</c>

00:11:01.480 --> 00:11:01.490 align:start position:0%
on the other on the other America tree
 

00:11:01.490 --> 00:11:05.079 align:start position:0%
on the other on the other America tree
okay<00:11:02.090><c> but</c><00:11:02.510><c> this</c><00:11:02.690><c> system</c><00:11:02.870><c> as</c><00:11:03.290><c> you</c><00:11:03.620><c> can</c><00:11:03.650><c> imagine</c>

00:11:05.079 --> 00:11:05.089 align:start position:0%
okay but this system as you can imagine
 

00:11:05.089 --> 00:11:08.350 align:start position:0%
okay but this system as you can imagine
quite<00:11:05.269><c> a</c><00:11:05.600><c> truce</c><00:11:05.959><c> nests</c><00:11:06.170><c> between</c><00:11:06.829><c> the</c><00:11:07.399><c> between</c>

00:11:08.350 --> 00:11:08.360 align:start position:0%
quite a truce nests between the between
 

00:11:08.360 --> 00:11:12.730 align:start position:0%
quite a truce nests between the between
the<00:11:08.569><c> user</c><00:11:09.019><c> and</c><00:11:09.199><c> the</c><00:11:09.410><c> relator</c><00:11:10.329><c> so</c><00:11:11.350><c> in</c><00:11:12.350><c> order</c><00:11:12.559><c> to</c>

00:11:12.730 --> 00:11:12.740 align:start position:0%
the user and the relator so in order to
 

00:11:12.740 --> 00:11:15.160 align:start position:0%
the user and the relator so in order to
solve<00:11:13.069><c> to</c><00:11:13.459><c> solve</c><00:11:13.670><c> that</c><00:11:13.970><c> what</c><00:11:14.629><c> we</c><00:11:14.839><c> are</c><00:11:14.930><c> working</c>

00:11:15.160 --> 00:11:15.170 align:start position:0%
solve to solve that what we are working
 

00:11:15.170 --> 00:11:16.889 align:start position:0%
solve to solve that what we are working
is<00:11:15.499><c> in</c><00:11:15.680><c> the</c><00:11:15.769><c> truth</c><00:11:16.009><c> less</c><00:11:16.220><c> relayer</c>

00:11:16.889 --> 00:11:16.899 align:start position:0%
is in the truth less relayer
 

00:11:16.899 --> 00:11:20.079 align:start position:0%
is in the truth less relayer
so<00:11:17.899><c> what's</c><00:11:18.230><c> a</c><00:11:18.379><c> trusted</c><00:11:18.769><c> relay</c><00:11:19.069><c> a</c><00:11:19.430><c> truce</c><00:11:19.910><c> less</c>

00:11:20.079 --> 00:11:20.089 align:start position:0%
so what's a trusted relay a truce less
 

00:11:20.089 --> 00:11:22.299 align:start position:0%
so what's a trusted relay a truce less
relay<00:11:20.480><c> here</c><00:11:20.540><c> is</c><00:11:21.110><c> several</c><00:11:21.620><c> layer</c><00:11:21.740><c> that</c><00:11:22.069><c> can</c>

00:11:22.299 --> 00:11:22.309 align:start position:0%
relay here is several layer that can
 

00:11:22.309 --> 00:11:26.199 align:start position:0%
relay here is several layer that can
match<00:11:22.550><c> it</c><00:11:22.759><c> so</c><00:11:23.720><c> layer</c><00:11:24.050><c> that</c><00:11:24.709><c> I</c><00:11:24.889><c> can</c><00:11:25.129><c> tell</c><00:11:25.970><c> to</c><00:11:26.120><c> the</c>

00:11:26.199 --> 00:11:26.209 align:start position:0%
match it so layer that I can tell to the
 

00:11:26.209 --> 00:11:30.509 align:start position:0%
match it so layer that I can tell to the
river<00:11:26.360><c> layer</c><00:11:26.509><c> and</c><00:11:26.839><c> the</c><00:11:27.350><c> layer</c><00:11:28.809><c> cannot</c><00:11:29.809><c> publish</c>

00:11:30.509 --> 00:11:30.519 align:start position:0%
river layer and the layer cannot publish
 

00:11:30.519 --> 00:11:35.710 align:start position:0%
river layer and the layer cannot publish
anything<00:11:31.519><c> in</c><00:11:32.209><c> the</c><00:11:32.809><c> unchain</c><00:11:34.300><c> to</c><00:11:35.300><c> ensure</c><00:11:35.689><c> that</c>

00:11:35.710 --> 00:11:35.720 align:start position:0%
anything in the unchain to ensure that
 

00:11:35.720 --> 00:11:38.489 align:start position:0%
anything in the unchain to ensure that
the<00:11:36.379><c> relay</c><00:11:36.649><c> when</c><00:11:37.279><c> the</c><00:11:37.399><c> relay</c><00:11:37.610><c> is</c><00:11:37.639><c> publishing</c>

00:11:38.489 --> 00:11:38.499 align:start position:0%
the relay when the relay is publishing
 

00:11:38.499 --> 00:11:40.900 align:start position:0%
the relay when the relay is publishing
when<00:11:39.499><c> the</c><00:11:39.589><c> relay</c><00:11:39.829><c> is</c><00:11:39.860><c> publishing</c><00:11:40.370><c> that</c><00:11:40.699><c> on</c>

00:11:40.900 --> 00:11:40.910 align:start position:0%
when the relay is publishing that on
 

00:11:40.910 --> 00:11:45.400 align:start position:0%
when the relay is publishing that on
chain<00:11:41.379><c> it's</c><00:11:42.379><c> also</c><00:11:43.509><c> besides</c><00:11:44.509><c> that</c><00:11:44.809><c> besides</c><00:11:45.019><c> the</c>

00:11:45.400 --> 00:11:45.410 align:start position:0%
chain it's also besides that besides the
 

00:11:45.410 --> 00:11:48.449 align:start position:0%
chain it's also besides that besides the
route<00:11:45.589><c> it</c><00:11:45.980><c> also</c><00:11:46.309><c> adds</c><00:11:46.699><c> zero</c><00:11:47.480><c> knowledge</c><00:11:47.689><c> proof</c>

00:11:48.449 --> 00:11:48.459 align:start position:0%
route it also adds zero knowledge proof
 

00:11:48.459 --> 00:11:52.030 align:start position:0%
route it also adds zero knowledge proof
that<00:11:49.459><c> warranties</c><00:11:50.059><c> that</c><00:11:50.449><c> disclaim</c><00:11:51.379><c> or</c><00:11:51.620><c> if</c><00:11:51.920><c> you</c>

00:11:52.030 --> 00:11:52.040 align:start position:0%
that warranties that disclaim or if you
 

00:11:52.040 --> 00:11:53.889 align:start position:0%
that warranties that disclaim or if you
want<00:11:52.220><c> all</c><00:11:52.339><c> the</c><00:11:52.519><c> claims</c><00:11:52.759><c> that</c><00:11:52.939><c> are</c><00:11:53.059><c> updated</c><00:11:53.720><c> in</c>

00:11:53.889 --> 00:11:53.899 align:start position:0%
want all the claims that are updated in
 

00:11:53.899 --> 00:11:58.210 align:start position:0%
want all the claims that are updated in
this<00:11:54.379><c> change</c><00:11:54.879><c> follows</c><00:11:55.879><c> a</c><00:11:56.089><c> specific</c><00:11:56.300><c> rules</c><00:11:57.220><c> so</c>

00:11:58.210 --> 00:11:58.220 align:start position:0%
this change follows a specific rules so
 

00:11:58.220 --> 00:12:01.030 align:start position:0%
this change follows a specific rules so
in<00:11:58.370><c> this</c><00:11:58.519><c> way</c><00:11:58.759><c> the</c><00:11:59.660><c> user</c><00:11:59.870><c> have</c><00:12:00.319><c> the</c><00:12:00.529><c> warranty</c>

00:12:01.030 --> 00:12:01.040 align:start position:0%
in this way the user have the warranty
 

00:12:01.040 --> 00:12:04.420 align:start position:0%
in this way the user have the warranty
that<00:12:01.699><c> the</c><00:12:01.850><c> relay</c><00:12:02.120><c> err</c><00:12:02.149><c> will</c><00:12:02.930><c> not</c><00:12:03.499><c> what</c><00:12:04.279><c> we</c>

00:12:04.420 --> 00:12:04.430 align:start position:0%
that the relay err will not what we
 

00:12:04.430 --> 00:12:05.769 align:start position:0%
that the relay err will not what we
means<00:12:04.610><c> with</c><00:12:04.819><c> that</c><00:12:04.970><c> of</c><00:12:05.120><c> course</c><00:12:05.389><c> the</c><00:12:05.480><c> relator</c>

00:12:05.769 --> 00:12:05.779 align:start position:0%
means with that of course the relator
 

00:12:05.779 --> 00:12:09.460 align:start position:0%
means with that of course the relator
can<00:12:06.019><c> stop</c><00:12:06.290><c> working</c><00:12:07.120><c> maybe</c><00:12:08.120><c> we</c><00:12:08.300><c> have</c><00:12:08.569><c> maybe</c><00:12:09.170><c> or</c>

00:12:09.460 --> 00:12:09.470 align:start position:0%
can stop working maybe we have maybe or
 

00:12:09.470 --> 00:12:11.530 align:start position:0%
can stop working maybe we have maybe or
maybe<00:12:09.769><c> you</c><00:12:10.550><c> don't</c><00:12:10.730><c> get</c><00:12:10.819><c> any</c><00:12:11.089><c> proof</c><00:12:11.300><c> from</c><00:12:11.449><c> the</c>

00:12:11.530 --> 00:12:11.540 align:start position:0%
maybe you don't get any proof from the
 

00:12:11.540 --> 00:12:13.530 align:start position:0%
maybe you don't get any proof from the
earlier<00:12:11.870><c> of</c><00:12:12.170><c> course</c><00:12:12.620><c> the</c><00:12:12.709><c> users</c><00:12:13.009><c> also</c><00:12:13.220><c> can</c>

00:12:13.530 --> 00:12:13.540 align:start position:0%
earlier of course the users also can
 

00:12:13.540 --> 00:12:16.600 align:start position:0%
earlier of course the users also can
always<00:12:14.540><c> can</c><00:12:14.809><c> change</c><00:12:15.319><c> offer</c><00:12:16.009><c> a</c><00:12:16.189><c> layer</c><00:12:16.339><c> and</c>

00:12:16.600 --> 00:12:16.610 align:start position:0%
always can change offer a layer and
 

00:12:16.610 --> 00:12:18.730 align:start position:0%
always can change offer a layer and
maybe<00:12:16.759><c> change</c><00:12:17.089><c> another</c><00:12:17.360><c> to</c><00:12:17.600><c> server</c><00:12:17.870><c> layer</c><00:12:18.019><c> but</c>

00:12:18.730 --> 00:12:18.740 align:start position:0%
maybe change another to server layer but
 

00:12:18.740 --> 00:12:21.220 align:start position:0%
maybe change another to server layer but
if<00:12:18.889><c> you</c><00:12:19.009><c> get</c><00:12:19.249><c> a</c><00:12:19.279><c> proof</c><00:12:19.670><c> from</c><00:12:20.420><c> the</c><00:12:20.509><c> layer</c><00:12:20.870><c> you</c>

00:12:21.220 --> 00:12:21.230 align:start position:0%
if you get a proof from the layer you
 

00:12:21.230 --> 00:12:26.470 align:start position:0%
if you get a proof from the layer you
know<00:12:21.800><c> that</c><00:12:22.339><c> this</c><00:12:22.550><c> proof</c><00:12:22.819><c> is</c><00:12:23.089><c> valid</c><00:12:25.480><c> valid</c>

00:12:26.470 --> 00:12:26.480 align:start position:0%
know that this proof is valid valid
 

00:12:26.480 --> 00:12:28.840 align:start position:0%
know that this proof is valid valid
means<00:12:26.839><c> that</c><00:12:27.199><c> if</c><00:12:27.470><c> this</c><00:12:27.920><c> proof</c><00:12:28.220><c> says</c><00:12:28.490><c> that</c><00:12:28.730><c> you</c>

00:12:28.840 --> 00:12:28.850 align:start position:0%
means that if this proof says that you
 

00:12:28.850 --> 00:12:31.720 align:start position:0%
means that if this proof says that you
claim<00:12:29.120><c> it</c><00:12:29.269><c> something</c><00:12:30.040><c> you</c><00:12:31.040><c> can</c><00:12:31.309><c> be</c><00:12:31.429><c> sure</c><00:12:31.699><c> that</c>

00:12:31.720 --> 00:12:31.730 align:start position:0%
claim it something you can be sure that
 

00:12:31.730 --> 00:12:34.900 align:start position:0%
claim it something you can be sure that
this<00:12:32.209><c> user</c><00:12:32.629><c> claim</c><00:12:33.319><c> it</c><00:12:33.499><c> something</c><00:12:33.889><c> or</c><00:12:34.370><c> the</c>

00:12:34.900 --> 00:12:34.910 align:start position:0%
this user claim it something or the
 

00:12:34.910 --> 00:12:37.269 align:start position:0%
this user claim it something or the
other<00:12:34.939><c> way</c><00:12:35.209><c> around</c><00:12:35.360><c> if</c><00:12:35.809><c> the</c><00:12:36.199><c> proof</c><00:12:36.439><c> says</c><00:12:36.679><c> said</c>

00:12:37.269 --> 00:12:37.279 align:start position:0%
other way around if the proof says said
 

00:12:37.279 --> 00:12:40.480 align:start position:0%
other way around if the proof says said
that<00:12:37.490><c> you</c><00:12:37.639><c> didn't</c><00:12:37.910><c> claim</c><00:12:38.179><c> something</c><00:12:39.189><c> then</c><00:12:40.189><c> you</c>

00:12:40.480 --> 00:12:40.490 align:start position:0%
that you didn't claim something then you
 

00:12:40.490 --> 00:12:42.689 align:start position:0%
that you didn't claim something then you
can<00:12:40.519><c> be</c><00:12:40.850><c> sure</c><00:12:41.029><c> that</c><00:12:41.360><c> the</c><00:12:41.689><c> user</c><00:12:41.870><c> didn't</c><00:12:42.379><c> claim</c>

00:12:42.689 --> 00:12:42.699 align:start position:0%
can be sure that the user didn't claim
 

00:12:42.699 --> 00:12:46.419 align:start position:0%
can be sure that the user didn't claim
didn't<00:12:43.699><c> claim</c><00:12:43.879><c> that</c><00:12:44.259><c> okay</c><00:12:45.259><c> so</c><00:12:45.709><c> and</c><00:12:46.069><c> as</c><00:12:46.249><c> I</c><00:12:46.370><c> told</c>

00:12:46.419 --> 00:12:46.429 align:start position:0%
didn't claim that okay so and as I told
 

00:12:46.429 --> 00:12:48.610 align:start position:0%
didn't claim that okay so and as I told
you<00:12:46.699><c> to</c><00:12:46.879><c> use</c><00:12:46.999><c> that</c><00:12:47.059><c> to</c><00:12:47.569><c> work</c><00:12:47.809><c> with</c><00:12:48.050><c> that</c><00:12:48.199><c> we</c>

00:12:48.610 --> 00:12:48.620 align:start position:0%
you to use that to work with that we
 

00:12:48.620 --> 00:12:49.989 align:start position:0%
you to use that to work with that we
need<00:12:48.800><c> to</c><00:12:48.920><c> create</c><00:12:49.129><c> this</c><00:12:49.370><c> zero</c><00:12:49.639><c> knowledge</c><00:12:49.819><c> proof</c>

00:12:49.989 --> 00:12:49.999 align:start position:0%
need to create this zero knowledge proof
 

00:12:49.999 --> 00:12:52.090 align:start position:0%
need to create this zero knowledge proof
as<00:12:50.449><c> you</c><00:12:50.629><c> can</c><00:12:50.809><c> imagine</c><00:12:50.959><c> if</c><00:12:51.410><c> you</c><00:12:51.499><c> want</c><00:12:51.709><c> to</c><00:12:51.800><c> if</c><00:12:51.949><c> you</c>

00:12:52.090 --> 00:12:52.100 align:start position:0%
as you can imagine if you want to if you
 

00:12:52.100 --> 00:12:53.710 align:start position:0%
as you can imagine if you want to if you
want<00:12:52.249><c> to</c><00:12:52.399><c> scale</c><00:12:52.670><c> that</c><00:12:52.850><c> we</c><00:12:53.420><c> need</c><00:12:53.540><c> to</c><00:12:53.629><c> create</c>

00:12:53.710 --> 00:12:53.720 align:start position:0%
want to scale that we need to create
 

00:12:53.720 --> 00:12:57.549 align:start position:0%
want to scale that we need to create
this<00:12:53.929><c> big</c><00:12:54.699><c> constraint</c><00:12:55.699><c> circuit</c><00:12:56.509><c> to</c><00:12:56.689><c> create</c><00:12:57.290><c> as</c>

00:12:57.549 --> 00:12:57.559 align:start position:0%
this big constraint circuit to create as
 

00:12:57.559 --> 00:13:01.299 align:start position:0%
this big constraint circuit to create as
many<00:12:58.240><c> claims</c><00:12:59.240><c> per</c><00:12:59.870><c> transactions</c><00:13:00.499><c> and</c><00:13:00.709><c> this</c><00:13:01.189><c> is</c>

00:13:01.299 --> 00:13:01.309 align:start position:0%
many claims per transactions and this is
 

00:13:01.309 --> 00:13:03.009 align:start position:0%
many claims per transactions and this is
where<00:13:01.519><c> we</c><00:13:01.730><c> are</c><00:13:01.759><c> working</c><00:13:02.029><c> later</c><00:13:02.449><c> will</c><00:13:02.720><c> explain</c>

00:13:03.009 --> 00:13:03.019 align:start position:0%
where we are working later will explain
 

00:13:03.019 --> 00:13:05.110 align:start position:0%
where we are working later will explain
little<00:13:03.470><c> bit</c><00:13:03.649><c> the</c><00:13:03.920><c> update</c><00:13:04.220><c> on</c><00:13:04.399><c> the</c><00:13:04.730><c> zero</c>

00:13:05.110 --> 00:13:05.120 align:start position:0%
little bit the update on the zero
 

00:13:05.120 --> 00:13:09.850 align:start position:0%
little bit the update on the zero
knowledge<00:13:05.300><c> proof</c><00:13:05.449><c> state</c><00:13:08.470><c> let's</c><00:13:09.470><c> go</c><00:13:09.620><c> to</c><00:13:09.679><c> the</c>

00:13:09.850 --> 00:13:09.860 align:start position:0%
knowledge proof state let's go to the
 

00:13:09.860 --> 00:13:12.069 align:start position:0%
knowledge proof state let's go to the
privacy<00:13:10.399><c> part</c><00:13:10.639><c> because</c><00:13:11.240><c> here</c><00:13:11.480><c> we</c><00:13:11.809><c> are</c><00:13:11.899><c> also</c>

00:13:12.069 --> 00:13:12.079 align:start position:0%
privacy part because here we are also
 

00:13:12.079 --> 00:13:13.929 align:start position:0%
privacy part because here we are also
using<00:13:12.230><c> zero</c><00:13:12.649><c> knowledge</c><00:13:12.800><c> proof</c><00:13:12.920><c> but</c><00:13:13.670><c> this</c><00:13:13.819><c> is</c>

00:13:13.929 --> 00:13:13.939 align:start position:0%
using zero knowledge proof but this is
 

00:13:13.939 --> 00:13:16.150 align:start position:0%
using zero knowledge proof but this is
just<00:13:14.209><c> to</c><00:13:14.389><c> to</c><00:13:14.990><c> prove</c><00:13:15.230><c> things</c><00:13:15.559><c> without</c>

00:13:16.150 --> 00:13:16.160 align:start position:0%
just to to prove things without
 

00:13:16.160 --> 00:13:18.840 align:start position:0%
just to to prove things without
revealing<00:13:16.429><c> the</c><00:13:16.670><c> full</c><00:13:16.970><c> identity</c><00:13:17.529><c> in</c>

00:13:18.840 --> 00:13:18.850 align:start position:0%
revealing the full identity in
 

00:13:18.850 --> 00:13:21.329 align:start position:0%
revealing the full identity in
for<00:13:19.300><c> example</c><00:13:19.720><c> that</c><00:13:19.810><c> I</c><00:13:19.870><c> want</c><00:13:20.199><c> to</c><00:13:20.410><c> enter</c><00:13:21.160><c> to</c><00:13:21.190><c> a</c>

00:13:21.329 --> 00:13:21.339 align:start position:0%
for example that I want to enter to a
 

00:13:21.339 --> 00:13:24.600 align:start position:0%
for example that I want to enter to a
nightclub<00:13:21.610><c> I</c><00:13:22.180><c> want</c><00:13:23.019><c> to</c><00:13:23.230><c> prove</c><00:13:23.920><c> that</c><00:13:23.980><c> I'm</c><00:13:24.430><c> 18</c>

00:13:24.600 --> 00:13:24.610 align:start position:0%
nightclub I want to prove that I'm 18
 

00:13:24.610 --> 00:13:28.439 align:start position:0%
nightclub I want to prove that I'm 18
years<00:13:24.970><c> old</c><00:13:25.269><c> but</c><00:13:26.079><c> I</c><00:13:26.139><c> don't</c><00:13:26.620><c> want</c><00:13:26.920><c> to</c><00:13:27.269><c> tell</c><00:13:28.269><c> to</c>

00:13:28.439 --> 00:13:28.449 align:start position:0%
years old but I don't want to tell to
 

00:13:28.449 --> 00:13:30.150 align:start position:0%
years old but I don't want to tell to
the<00:13:28.529><c> entry</c><00:13:29.529><c> people</c>

00:13:30.150 --> 00:13:30.160 align:start position:0%
the entry people
 

00:13:30.160 --> 00:13:32.639 align:start position:0%
the entry people
Who<00:13:30.819><c> am</c><00:13:30.850><c> I</c><00:13:31.060><c> where</c><00:13:31.540><c> I</c><00:13:31.569><c> live</c><00:13:31.839><c> and</c><00:13:32.139><c> all</c><00:13:32.500><c> the</c>

00:13:32.639 --> 00:13:32.649 align:start position:0%
Who am I where I live and all the
 

00:13:32.649 --> 00:13:35.280 align:start position:0%
Who am I where I live and all the
information<00:13:33.190><c> about</c><00:13:33.279><c> that</c><00:13:33.430><c> so</c><00:13:34.300><c> I</c><00:13:34.569><c> can</c><00:13:35.019><c> make</c><00:13:35.259><c> a</c>

00:13:35.280 --> 00:13:35.290 align:start position:0%
information about that so I can make a
 

00:13:35.290 --> 00:13:37.650 align:start position:0%
information about that so I can make a
zero<00:13:35.740><c> knowledge</c><00:13:35.949><c> proof</c><00:13:36.100><c> that</c><00:13:36.970><c> prove</c><00:13:37.329><c> that</c><00:13:37.360><c> I</c>

00:13:37.650 --> 00:13:37.660 align:start position:0%
zero knowledge proof that prove that I
 

00:13:37.660 --> 00:13:40.889 align:start position:0%
zero knowledge proof that prove that I
really<00:13:38.050><c> hold</c><00:13:38.319><c> the</c><00:13:38.440><c> key</c><00:13:39.240><c> that</c><00:13:40.240><c> according</c><00:13:40.870><c> to</c>

00:13:40.889 --> 00:13:40.899 align:start position:0%
really hold the key that according to
 

00:13:40.899 --> 00:13:45.809 align:start position:0%
really hold the key that according to
the<00:13:41.380><c> government</c><00:13:42.630><c> I'm</c><00:13:43.630><c> 18</c><00:13:44.470><c> a</c><00:13:44.680><c> year</c><00:13:44.920><c> years</c><00:13:45.190><c> old</c>

00:13:45.809 --> 00:13:45.819 align:start position:0%
the government I'm 18 a year years old
 

00:13:45.819 --> 00:13:49.740 align:start position:0%
the government I'm 18 a year years old
but<00:13:47.220><c> without</c><00:13:48.220><c> revealing</c><00:13:48.540><c> anything</c><00:13:49.540><c> else</c>

00:13:49.740 --> 00:13:49.750 align:start position:0%
but without revealing anything else
 

00:13:49.750 --> 00:13:52.710 align:start position:0%
but without revealing anything else
about<00:13:50.199><c> my</c><00:13:50.500><c> identity</c><00:13:51.360><c> the</c><00:13:52.360><c> same</c><00:13:52.540><c> thing</c>

00:13:52.710 --> 00:13:52.720 align:start position:0%
about my identity the same thing
 

00:13:52.720 --> 00:13:54.150 align:start position:0%
about my identity the same thing
happened<00:13:53.050><c> for</c><00:13:53.170><c> example</c><00:13:53.529><c> with</c><00:13:53.709><c> anonymous</c>

00:13:54.150 --> 00:13:54.160 align:start position:0%
happened for example with anonymous
 

00:13:54.160 --> 00:13:57.809 align:start position:0%
happened for example with anonymous
voting<00:13:55.470><c> if</c><00:13:56.470><c> I</c><00:13:56.649><c> when</c><00:13:56.829><c> I</c><00:13:56.860><c> want</c><00:13:57.130><c> to</c><00:13:57.279><c> vote</c><00:13:57.459><c> when</c><00:13:57.790><c> I</c>

00:13:57.809 --> 00:13:57.819 align:start position:0%
voting if I when I want to vote when I
 

00:13:57.819 --> 00:14:01.439 align:start position:0%
voting if I when I want to vote when I
want<00:13:58.029><c> to</c><00:13:58.149><c> vote</c><00:13:58.360><c> I</c><00:13:59.819><c> don't</c><00:14:00.819><c> want</c><00:14:01.000><c> to</c><00:14:01.089><c> reveal</c><00:14:01.269><c> my</c>

00:14:01.439 --> 00:14:01.449 align:start position:0%
want to vote I don't want to reveal my
 

00:14:01.449 --> 00:14:04.530 align:start position:0%
want to vote I don't want to reveal my
identity<00:14:01.660><c> I</c><00:14:02.380><c> want</c><00:14:03.339><c> to</c><00:14:03.430><c> vote</c><00:14:03.610><c> I</c><00:14:03.880><c> need</c><00:14:04.209><c> but</c><00:14:04.389><c> I</c>

00:14:04.530 --> 00:14:04.540 align:start position:0%
identity I want to vote I need but I
 

00:14:04.540 --> 00:14:07.379 align:start position:0%
identity I want to vote I need but I
need<00:14:04.720><c> to</c><00:14:04.839><c> ensure</c><00:14:05.319><c> that</c><00:14:05.589><c> I</c><00:14:05.800><c> can</c><00:14:06.069><c> vote</c><00:14:06.250><c> but</c><00:14:07.120><c> I</c><00:14:07.240><c> can</c>

00:14:07.379 --> 00:14:07.389 align:start position:0%
need to ensure that I can vote but I can
 

00:14:07.389 --> 00:14:10.079 align:start position:0%
need to ensure that I can vote but I can
vote<00:14:07.540><c> that</c><00:14:07.720><c> I</c><00:14:07.810><c> can</c><00:14:08.019><c> that</c><00:14:08.560><c> I</c><00:14:08.769><c> am</c><00:14:09.160><c> that</c><00:14:09.699><c> somebody</c>

00:14:10.079 --> 00:14:10.089 align:start position:0%
vote that I can that I am that somebody
 

00:14:10.089 --> 00:14:13.079 align:start position:0%
vote that I can that I am that somebody
claim<00:14:10.449><c> it</c><00:14:10.660><c> that</c><00:14:11.500><c> I</c><00:14:11.709><c> can</c><00:14:12.009><c> participate</c><00:14:12.339><c> in</c><00:14:12.819><c> that</c>

00:14:13.079 --> 00:14:13.089 align:start position:0%
claim it that I can participate in that
 

00:14:13.089 --> 00:14:16.769 align:start position:0%
claim it that I can participate in that
voting<00:14:13.990><c> okay</c><00:14:14.649><c> this</c><00:14:14.949><c> can</c><00:14:15.130><c> be</c><00:14:15.220><c> used</c><00:14:15.370><c> in</c><00:14:15.569><c> this</c><00:14:16.569><c> can</c>

00:14:16.769 --> 00:14:16.779 align:start position:0%
voting okay this can be used in this can
 

00:14:16.779 --> 00:14:21.120 align:start position:0%
voting okay this can be used in this can
be<00:14:16.899><c> use</c><00:14:17.079><c> in</c><00:14:17.110><c> in</c><00:14:17.829><c> in</c><00:14:18.720><c> this</c><00:14:19.720><c> can</c><00:14:19.930><c> be</c><00:14:20.019><c> used</c><00:14:20.170><c> so</c><00:14:20.980><c> this</c>

00:14:21.120 --> 00:14:21.130 align:start position:0%
be use in in in this can be used so this
 

00:14:21.130 --> 00:14:22.889 align:start position:0%
be use in in in this can be used so this
can<00:14:21.279><c> be</c><00:14:21.370><c> used</c><00:14:21.490><c> for</c><00:14:21.610><c> a</c><00:14:21.639><c> for</c><00:14:22.089><c> a</c><00:14:22.120><c> voting</c><00:14:22.509><c> system</c>

00:14:22.889 --> 00:14:22.899 align:start position:0%
can be used for a for a voting system
 

00:14:22.899 --> 00:14:25.379 align:start position:0%
can be used for a for a voting system
another<00:14:23.740><c> example</c><00:14:23.920><c> that</c><00:14:24.310><c> implies</c><00:14:24.790><c> for</c><00:14:24.819><c> example</c>

00:14:25.379 --> 00:14:25.389 align:start position:0%
another example that implies for example
 

00:14:25.389 --> 00:14:28.759 align:start position:0%
another example that implies for example
as<00:14:25.480><c> Marc</c><00:14:25.689><c> contract</c><00:14:26.050><c> would</c><00:14:26.170><c> be</c><00:14:26.319><c> an</c><00:14:26.410><c> IC</c><00:14:26.560><c> o----</c>

00:14:28.759 --> 00:14:28.769 align:start position:0%
as Marc contract would be an IC o----
 

00:14:28.769 --> 00:14:33.210 align:start position:0%
as Marc contract would be an IC o----
may<00:14:29.769><c> be</c><00:14:29.829><c> an</c><00:14:30.189><c> IC</c><00:14:30.519><c> o----</c><00:14:31.139><c> requires</c><00:14:32.139><c> that</c><00:14:33.040><c> the</c>

00:14:33.210 --> 00:14:33.220 align:start position:0%
may be an IC o---- requires that the
 

00:14:33.220 --> 00:14:34.710 align:start position:0%
may be an IC o---- requires that the
people<00:14:33.490><c> that</c><00:14:33.610><c> participate</c><00:14:34.120><c> in</c><00:14:34.149><c> this</c><00:14:34.389><c> in</c><00:14:34.689><c> that</c>

00:14:34.710 --> 00:14:34.720 align:start position:0%
people that participate in this in that
 

00:14:34.720 --> 00:14:36.920 align:start position:0%
people that participate in this in that
IC<00:14:35.139><c> o----</c><00:14:35.170><c> is</c><00:14:35.380><c> authorized</c><00:14:35.860><c> by</c><00:14:36.130><c> a</c><00:14:36.160><c> third</c><00:14:36.430><c> party</c>

00:14:36.920 --> 00:14:36.930 align:start position:0%
IC o---- is authorized by a third party
 

00:14:36.930 --> 00:14:39.389 align:start position:0%
IC o---- is authorized by a third party
because<00:14:37.930><c> somehow</c><00:14:38.110><c> I</c><00:14:38.290><c> see</c><00:14:38.649><c> from</c><00:14:38.980><c> some</c><00:14:39.220><c> legal</c>

00:14:39.389 --> 00:14:39.399 align:start position:0%
because somehow I see from some legal
 

00:14:39.399 --> 00:14:44.340 align:start position:0%
because somehow I see from some legal
stuff<00:14:39.730><c> I</c><00:14:40.380><c> can't</c><00:14:41.380><c> create</c><00:14:41.680><c> an</c><00:14:41.920><c> IC</c><00:14:42.310><c> o----</c><00:14:42.339><c> a</c><00:14:43.350><c> smart</c>

00:14:44.340 --> 00:14:44.350 align:start position:0%
stuff I can't create an IC o---- a smart
 

00:14:44.350 --> 00:14:46.920 align:start position:0%
stuff I can't create an IC o---- a smart
contract<00:14:44.529><c> IC</c><00:14:44.920><c> o----</c><00:14:45.130><c> that</c><00:14:45.970><c> accepts</c><00:14:46.509><c> zero</c>

00:14:46.920 --> 00:14:46.930 align:start position:0%
contract IC o---- that accepts zero
 

00:14:46.930 --> 00:14:52.259 align:start position:0%
contract IC o---- that accepts zero
knowledge<00:14:47.170><c> proof</c><00:14:48.600><c> that</c><00:14:49.600><c> warranties</c><00:14:50.439><c> that</c><00:14:51.269><c> the</c>

00:14:52.259 --> 00:14:52.269 align:start position:0%
knowledge proof that warranties that the
 

00:14:52.269 --> 00:14:57.329 align:start position:0%
knowledge proof that warranties that the
people<00:14:52.630><c> that</c><00:14:52.779><c> participate</c><00:14:53.410><c> that</c><00:14:55.980><c> it's</c><00:14:56.980><c> okay</c>

00:14:57.329 --> 00:14:57.339 align:start position:0%
people that participate that it's okay
 

00:14:57.339 --> 00:14:59.400 align:start position:0%
people that participate that it's okay
it's<00:14:57.550><c> in</c><00:14:57.670><c> the</c><00:14:57.790><c> list</c><00:14:57.970><c> it's</c><00:14:58.750><c> now</c><00:14:58.930><c> to</c><00:14:58.990><c> write</c><00:14:59.259><c> this</c>

00:14:59.400 --> 00:14:59.410 align:start position:0%
it's in the list it's now to write this
 

00:14:59.410 --> 00:15:01.679 align:start position:0%
it's in the list it's now to write this
person<00:14:59.889><c> but</c><00:15:00.459><c> without</c><00:15:00.819><c> revealing</c><00:15:01.060><c> exactly</c>

00:15:01.679 --> 00:15:01.689 align:start position:0%
person but without revealing exactly
 

00:15:01.689 --> 00:15:04.559 align:start position:0%
person but without revealing exactly
what<00:15:01.870><c> I</c><00:15:01.899><c> Who</c><00:15:02.079><c> am</c><00:15:02.380><c> I</c><00:15:02.500><c> or</c><00:15:02.740><c> even</c><00:15:03.220><c> how</c><00:15:03.490><c> much</c><00:15:03.699><c> money</c><00:15:04.449><c> I</c>

00:15:04.559 --> 00:15:04.569 align:start position:0%
what I Who am I or even how much money I
 

00:15:04.569 --> 00:15:12.079 align:start position:0%
what I Who am I or even how much money I
spend<00:15:05.019><c> on</c><00:15:05.139><c> that</c><00:15:05.649><c> on</c><00:15:05.980><c> that</c><00:15:06.269><c> on</c><00:15:07.269><c> that</c><00:15:07.569><c> IC</c><00:15:08.079><c> o----</c>

00:15:12.079 --> 00:15:12.089 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:15:12.089 --> 00:15:14.790 align:start position:0%
 
another<00:15:13.089><c> interesting</c><00:15:13.630><c> things</c><00:15:13.899><c> that</c><00:15:14.259><c> we</c><00:15:14.740><c> are</c>

00:15:14.790 --> 00:15:14.800 align:start position:0%
another interesting things that we are
 

00:15:14.800 --> 00:15:17.160 align:start position:0%
another interesting things that we are
doing<00:15:15.069><c> is</c><00:15:15.430><c> this</c><00:15:15.970><c> concept</c><00:15:16.449><c> of</c><00:15:16.600><c> non-reusable</c>

00:15:17.160 --> 00:15:17.170 align:start position:0%
doing is this concept of non-reusable
 

00:15:17.170 --> 00:15:18.030 align:start position:0%
doing is this concept of non-reusable
proofs

00:15:18.030 --> 00:15:18.040 align:start position:0%
proofs
 

00:15:18.040 --> 00:15:21.329 align:start position:0%
proofs
what's<00:15:18.699><c> a</c><00:15:18.850><c> non-reusable</c><00:15:19.269><c> proof</c><00:15:20.130><c> imagine</c><00:15:21.130><c> that</c>

00:15:21.329 --> 00:15:21.339 align:start position:0%
what's a non-reusable proof imagine that
 

00:15:21.339 --> 00:15:24.420 align:start position:0%
what's a non-reusable proof imagine that
i<00:15:21.550><c> belongs</c><00:15:22.060><c> to</c><00:15:22.360><c> a</c><00:15:22.389><c> political</c><00:15:22.750><c> party</c><00:15:23.430><c> according</c>

00:15:24.420 --> 00:15:24.430 align:start position:0%
i belongs to a political party according
 

00:15:24.430 --> 00:15:26.939 align:start position:0%
i belongs to a political party according
to<00:15:24.790><c> the</c><00:15:24.880><c> political</c><00:15:25.300><c> party</c><00:15:25.660><c> so</c><00:15:26.620><c> the</c><00:15:26.740><c> political</c>

00:15:26.939 --> 00:15:26.949 align:start position:0%
to the political party so the political
 

00:15:26.949 --> 00:15:29.129 align:start position:0%
to the political party so the political
party<00:15:27.399><c> maybe</c><00:15:27.579><c> makes</c><00:15:28.000><c> a</c><00:15:28.209><c> private</c><00:15:28.569><c> claim</c><00:15:28.750><c> on</c><00:15:28.990><c> me</c>

00:15:29.129 --> 00:15:29.139 align:start position:0%
party maybe makes a private claim on me
 

00:15:29.139 --> 00:15:31.410 align:start position:0%
party maybe makes a private claim on me
that<00:15:29.680><c> I</c><00:15:29.800><c> belongs</c><00:15:30.100><c> to</c><00:15:30.189><c> a</c><00:15:30.279><c> political</c><00:15:30.430><c> party</c>

00:15:31.410 --> 00:15:31.420 align:start position:0%
that I belongs to a political party
 

00:15:31.420 --> 00:15:34.199 align:start position:0%
that I belongs to a political party
I<00:15:31.450><c> want</c><00:15:32.140><c> to</c><00:15:32.290><c> prove</c><00:15:32.470><c> him</c><00:15:32.790><c> that</c><00:15:33.790><c> I'm</c><00:15:33.970><c> from</c><00:15:34.180><c> that</c>

00:15:34.199 --> 00:15:34.209 align:start position:0%
I want to prove him that I'm from that
 

00:15:34.209 --> 00:15:37.949 align:start position:0%
I want to prove him that I'm from that
political<00:15:34.779><c> party</c><00:15:35.250><c> but</c><00:15:36.250><c> what</c><00:15:36.430><c> happened</c><00:15:37.000><c> if</c><00:15:37.240><c> he</c>

00:15:37.949 --> 00:15:37.959 align:start position:0%
political party but what happened if he
 

00:15:37.959 --> 00:15:41.579 align:start position:0%
political party but what happened if he
just<00:15:38.680><c> published</c><00:15:38.890><c> this</c><00:15:39.880><c> proof</c><00:15:40.300><c> to</c><00:15:41.019><c> everywhere</c>

00:15:41.579 --> 00:15:41.589 align:start position:0%
just published this proof to everywhere
 

00:15:41.589 --> 00:15:44.550 align:start position:0%
just published this proof to everywhere
in<00:15:41.649><c> the</c><00:15:41.920><c> world</c><00:15:42.209><c> everybody</c><00:15:43.209><c> would</c><00:15:43.450><c> know</c><00:15:43.480><c> that</c><00:15:43.990><c> I</c>

00:15:44.550 --> 00:15:44.560 align:start position:0%
in the world everybody would know that I
 

00:15:44.560 --> 00:15:46.550 align:start position:0%
in the world everybody would know that I
am<00:15:44.680><c> from</c><00:15:44.890><c> that</c><00:15:44.920><c> political</c><00:15:45.579><c> party</c><00:15:45.910><c> a</c>

00:15:46.550 --> 00:15:46.560 align:start position:0%
am from that political party a
 

00:15:46.560 --> 00:15:50.160 align:start position:0%
am from that political party a
non-reusable<00:15:47.560><c> proof</c><00:15:48.250><c> is</c><00:15:48.550><c> a</c><00:15:48.610><c> proof</c><00:15:49.029><c> that</c><00:15:49.870><c> I</c>

00:15:50.160 --> 00:15:50.170 align:start position:0%
non-reusable proof is a proof that I
 

00:15:50.170 --> 00:15:53.100 align:start position:0%
non-reusable proof is a proof that I
can't<00:15:50.800><c> send</c><00:15:51.190><c> it</c><00:15:51.339><c> to</c><00:15:51.459><c> him</c><00:15:51.700><c> and</c><00:15:51.940><c> I</c><00:15:52.690><c> have</c><00:15:52.959><c> the</c>

00:15:53.100 --> 00:15:53.110 align:start position:0%
can't send it to him and I have the
 

00:15:53.110 --> 00:15:56.220 align:start position:0%
can't send it to him and I have the
warranty<00:15:53.620><c> that</c><00:15:54.070><c> if</c><00:15:54.220><c> he</c><00:15:54.399><c> published</c><00:15:54.790><c> that</c><00:15:55.230><c> it</c>

00:15:56.220 --> 00:15:56.230 align:start position:0%
warranty that if he published that it
 

00:15:56.230 --> 00:15:59.040 align:start position:0%
warranty that if he published that it
will<00:15:56.560><c> not</c><00:15:56.800><c> prove</c><00:15:57.100><c> nothing</c><00:15:57.519><c> of</c><00:15:57.730><c> course</c><00:15:58.390><c> he</c><00:15:58.839><c> can</c>

00:15:59.040 --> 00:15:59.050 align:start position:0%
will not prove nothing of course he can
 

00:15:59.050 --> 00:16:00.810 align:start position:0%
will not prove nothing of course he can
always<00:15:59.560><c> say</c><00:15:59.800><c> that</c><00:15:59.829><c> I'm</c><00:16:00.130><c> from</c><00:16:00.310><c> that</c><00:16:00.430><c> political</c>

00:16:00.810 --> 00:16:00.820 align:start position:0%
always say that I'm from that political
 

00:16:00.820 --> 00:16:02.370 align:start position:0%
always say that I'm from that political
party<00:16:01.120><c> and</c><00:16:01.209><c> his</c><00:16:01.300><c> information</c><00:16:01.750><c> that</c><00:16:02.050><c> he</c><00:16:02.200><c> knows</c>

00:16:02.370 --> 00:16:02.380 align:start position:0%
party and his information that he knows
 

00:16:02.380 --> 00:16:05.910 align:start position:0%
party and his information that he knows
but<00:16:02.890><c> he</c><00:16:02.950><c> will</c><00:16:03.310><c> not</c><00:16:03.519><c> be</c><00:16:03.700><c> able</c><00:16:03.880><c> to</c><00:16:04.060><c> prove</c><00:16:04.860><c> how</c><00:16:05.860><c> we</c>

00:16:05.910 --> 00:16:05.920 align:start position:0%
but he will not be able to prove how we
 

00:16:05.920 --> 00:16:06.780 align:start position:0%
but he will not be able to prove how we
do<00:16:06.279><c> that</c>

00:16:06.780 --> 00:16:06.790 align:start position:0%
do that
 

00:16:06.790 --> 00:16:10.009 align:start position:0%
do that
mainly<00:16:07.600><c> is</c><00:16:07.779><c> we're</c><00:16:07.959><c> taking</c><00:16:08.320><c> the</c><00:16:08.589><c> proof</c><00:16:09.339><c> I'm</c>

00:16:10.009 --> 00:16:10.019 align:start position:0%
mainly is we're taking the proof I'm
 

00:16:10.019 --> 00:16:14.069 align:start position:0%
mainly is we're taking the proof I'm
from<00:16:11.019><c> that</c><00:16:11.050><c> political</c><00:16:11.740><c> party</c><00:16:12.450><c> okay</c><00:16:13.450><c> and</c><00:16:13.690><c> I'm</c>

00:16:14.069 --> 00:16:14.079 align:start position:0%
from that political party okay and I'm
 

00:16:14.079 --> 00:16:18.230 align:start position:0%
from that political party okay and I'm
creating<00:16:14.380><c> like</c><00:16:14.769><c> another</c><00:16:15.160><c> proof</c><00:16:15.550><c> that</c><00:16:16.950><c> says</c>

00:16:18.230 --> 00:16:18.240 align:start position:0%
creating like another proof that says
 

00:16:18.240 --> 00:16:22.440 align:start position:0%
creating like another proof that says
okay<00:16:19.240><c> I'm</c><00:16:19.510><c> proving</c><00:16:20.050><c> to</c><00:16:20.079><c> you</c><00:16:20.440><c> that</c><00:16:20.579><c> I</c><00:16:21.579><c> am</c><00:16:22.000><c> from</c>

00:16:22.440 --> 00:16:22.450 align:start position:0%
okay I'm proving to you that I am from
 

00:16:22.450 --> 00:16:26.040 align:start position:0%
okay I'm proving to you that I am from
that<00:16:22.630><c> political</c><00:16:23.170><c> party</c><00:16:23.620><c> or</c><00:16:24.399><c> I</c><00:16:25.089><c> know</c><00:16:25.360><c> your</c>

00:16:26.040 --> 00:16:26.050 align:start position:0%
that political party or I know your
 

00:16:26.050 --> 00:16:29.970 align:start position:0%
that political party or I know your
private<00:16:26.529><c> key</c><00:16:27.329><c> of</c><00:16:28.329><c> course</c><00:16:28.839><c> I</c><00:16:29.200><c> don't</c><00:16:29.620><c> know</c><00:16:29.740><c> his</c>

00:16:29.970 --> 00:16:29.980 align:start position:0%
private key of course I don't know his
 

00:16:29.980 --> 00:16:33.840 align:start position:0%
private key of course I don't know his
private<00:16:30.339><c> key</c><00:16:30.490><c> so</c><00:16:30.700><c> he</c><00:16:31.510><c> is</c><00:16:31.660><c> sure</c><00:16:32.279><c> that</c><00:16:33.279><c> I</c><00:16:33.459><c> am</c><00:16:33.579><c> from</c>

00:16:33.840 --> 00:16:33.850 align:start position:0%
private key so he is sure that I am from
 

00:16:33.850 --> 00:16:36.600 align:start position:0%
private key so he is sure that I am from
that<00:16:34.000><c> political</c><00:16:34.480><c> party</c><00:16:34.949><c> but</c><00:16:35.949><c> what</c><00:16:36.130><c> happened</c>

00:16:36.600 --> 00:16:36.610 align:start position:0%
that political party but what happened
 

00:16:36.610 --> 00:16:38.819 align:start position:0%
that political party but what happened
now<00:16:36.790><c> when</c><00:16:37.329><c> he</c><00:16:37.600><c> published</c><00:16:37.839><c> that</c><00:16:38.170><c> to</c><00:16:38.440><c> everywhere</c>

00:16:38.819 --> 00:16:38.829 align:start position:0%
now when he published that to everywhere
 

00:16:38.829 --> 00:16:42.240 align:start position:0%
now when he published that to everywhere
else<00:16:38.910><c> he's</c><00:16:39.910><c> saying</c><00:16:40.240><c> his</c><00:16:41.199><c> proof</c><00:16:41.500><c> is</c><00:16:41.920><c> saying</c>

00:16:42.240 --> 00:16:42.250 align:start position:0%
else he's saying his proof is saying
 

00:16:42.250 --> 00:16:46.769 align:start position:0%
else he's saying his proof is saying
Jordi<00:16:43.060><c> is</c><00:16:43.089><c> from</c><00:16:43.839><c> that</c><00:16:43.990><c> political</c><00:16:44.500><c> party</c><00:16:44.890><c> or</c><00:16:45.779><c> I</c>

00:16:46.769 --> 00:16:46.779 align:start position:0%
Jordi is from that political party or I
 

00:16:46.779 --> 00:16:51.720 align:start position:0%
Jordi is from that political party or I
know<00:16:47.529><c> my</c><00:16:48.459><c> I</c><00:16:49.000><c> know</c><00:16:49.180><c> my</c><00:16:49.600><c> private</c><00:16:50.019><c> key</c><00:16:50.230><c> so</c><00:16:50.730><c> because</c>

00:16:51.720 --> 00:16:51.730 align:start position:0%
know my I know my private key so because
 

00:16:51.730 --> 00:16:54.090 align:start position:0%
know my I know my private key so because
you<00:16:52.510><c> know</c><00:16:52.630><c> everybody</c><00:16:53.260><c> knows</c><00:16:53.440><c> that</c><00:16:53.769><c> he</c><00:16:53.949><c> knows</c>

00:16:54.090 --> 00:16:54.100 align:start position:0%
you know everybody knows that he knows
 

00:16:54.100 --> 00:16:56.490 align:start position:0%
you know everybody knows that he knows
that<00:16:54.370><c> he</c><00:16:54.760><c> knows</c><00:16:54.910><c> the</c><00:16:55.089><c> private</c><00:16:55.390><c> key</c><00:16:55.570><c> is</c><00:16:55.899><c> obvious</c>

00:16:56.490 --> 00:16:56.500 align:start position:0%
that he knows the private key is obvious
 

00:16:56.500 --> 00:16:58.949 align:start position:0%
that he knows the private key is obvious
that<00:16:56.709><c> he</c><00:16:57.339><c> can</c><00:16:57.820><c> generate</c><00:16:57.940><c> as</c><00:16:58.300><c> many</c><00:16:58.420><c> proof</c><00:16:58.810><c> of</c>

00:16:58.949 --> 00:16:58.959 align:start position:0%
that he can generate as many proof of
 

00:16:58.959 --> 00:17:03.329 align:start position:0%
that he can generate as many proof of
those<00:16:59.670><c> faking</c><00:17:01.079><c> even</c><00:17:02.079><c> if</c><00:17:02.199><c> I'm</c><00:17:02.470><c> or</c><00:17:02.709><c> I'm</c><00:17:02.920><c> not</c><00:17:03.130><c> from</c>

00:17:03.329 --> 00:17:03.339 align:start position:0%
those faking even if I'm or I'm not from
 

00:17:03.339 --> 00:17:04.770 align:start position:0%
those faking even if I'm or I'm not from
the<00:17:03.430><c> political</c><00:17:03.640><c> party</c><00:17:04.030><c> so</c><00:17:04.209><c> this</c><00:17:04.360><c> part</c><00:17:04.630><c> this</c>

00:17:04.770 --> 00:17:04.780 align:start position:0%
the political party so this part this
 

00:17:04.780 --> 00:17:12.539 align:start position:0%
the political party so this part this
proof<00:17:05.169><c> is</c><00:17:05.500><c> not</c><00:17:06.160><c> usable</c><00:17:06.669><c> anymore</c><00:17:11.160><c> so</c><00:17:12.160><c> here</c><00:17:12.400><c> is</c>

00:17:12.539 --> 00:17:12.549 align:start position:0%
proof is not usable anymore so here is
 

00:17:12.549 --> 00:17:14.490 align:start position:0%
proof is not usable anymore so here is
more<00:17:12.910><c> or</c><00:17:12.939><c> less</c><00:17:13.179><c> the</c><00:17:13.419><c> technical</c><00:17:13.929><c> details</c><00:17:14.260><c> of</c>

00:17:14.490 --> 00:17:14.500 align:start position:0%
more or less the technical details of
 

00:17:14.500 --> 00:17:16.860 align:start position:0%
more or less the technical details of
what<00:17:14.799><c> we</c><00:17:14.980><c> are</c><00:17:15.010><c> doing</c><00:17:15.250><c> of</c><00:17:15.579><c> course</c>

00:17:16.860 --> 00:17:16.870 align:start position:0%
what we are doing of course
 

00:17:16.870 --> 00:17:19.770 align:start position:0%
what we are doing of course
identity<00:17:17.470><c> systems</c><00:17:17.890><c> like</c><00:17:18.459><c> this</c><00:17:18.669><c> are</c><00:17:19.089><c> required</c>

00:17:19.770 --> 00:17:19.780 align:start position:0%
identity systems like this are required
 

00:17:19.780 --> 00:17:22.710 align:start position:0%
identity systems like this are required
in<00:17:20.130><c> if</c><00:17:21.130><c> not</c><00:17:21.429><c> all</c><00:17:21.610><c> most</c><00:17:21.850><c> of</c><00:17:22.089><c> the</c><00:17:22.179><c> applications</c>

00:17:22.710 --> 00:17:22.720 align:start position:0%
in if not all most of the applications
 

00:17:22.720 --> 00:17:25.500 align:start position:0%
in if not all most of the applications
in<00:17:23.380><c> the</c><00:17:23.470><c> space</c><00:17:23.829><c> there</c><00:17:24.429><c> are</c><00:17:24.520><c> many</c><00:17:24.760><c> uses</c><00:17:25.000><c> to</c><00:17:25.329><c> use</c>

00:17:25.500 --> 00:17:25.510 align:start position:0%
in the space there are many uses to use
 

00:17:25.510 --> 00:17:28.289 align:start position:0%
in the space there are many uses to use
cases<00:17:25.780><c> from</c><00:17:26.110><c> reputation</c><00:17:26.890><c> systems</c><00:17:27.339><c> directory</c>

00:17:28.289 --> 00:17:28.299 align:start position:0%
cases from reputation systems directory
 

00:17:28.299 --> 00:17:31.760 align:start position:0%
cases from reputation systems directory
systems<00:17:29.010><c> signals</c><00:17:30.010><c> saying</c><00:17:30.160><c> simple</c><00:17:30.610><c> sang</c><00:17:30.790><c> ons</c>

00:17:31.760 --> 00:17:31.770 align:start position:0%
systems signals saying simple sang ons
 

00:17:31.770 --> 00:17:35.909 align:start position:0%
systems signals saying simple sang ons
many<00:17:32.770><c> I</c><00:17:32.860><c> would</c><00:17:33.460><c> say</c><00:17:33.640><c> that</c><00:17:34.620><c> almost</c><00:17:35.620><c> any</c>

00:17:35.909 --> 00:17:35.919 align:start position:0%
many I would say that almost any
 

00:17:35.919 --> 00:17:38.100 align:start position:0%
many I would say that almost any
application<00:17:36.610><c> that</c><00:17:36.640><c> you</c><00:17:37.390><c> think</c><00:17:37.690><c> that</c><00:17:37.900><c> there</c><00:17:38.020><c> is</c>

00:17:38.100 --> 00:17:38.110 align:start position:0%
application that you think that there is
 

00:17:38.110 --> 00:17:40.350 align:start position:0%
application that you think that there is
like<00:17:38.350><c> a</c><00:17:38.380><c> login</c><00:17:38.830><c> password</c><00:17:39.250><c> will</c><00:17:39.730><c> require</c><00:17:40.120><c> an</c>

00:17:40.350 --> 00:17:40.360 align:start position:0%
like a login password will require an
 

00:17:40.360 --> 00:17:44.570 align:start position:0%
like a login password will require an
identity<00:17:40.900><c> system</c><00:17:41.200><c> like</c><00:17:42.130><c> that</c>

00:17:44.570 --> 00:17:44.580 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:17:44.580 --> 00:17:46.920 align:start position:0%
 
what's<00:17:45.580><c> the</c><00:17:45.670><c> status</c><00:17:45.880><c> of</c><00:17:46.180><c> the</c><00:17:46.270><c> project</c><00:17:46.450><c> well</c><00:17:46.840><c> we</c>

00:17:46.920 --> 00:17:46.930 align:start position:0%
what's the status of the project well we
 

00:17:46.930 --> 00:17:49.370 align:start position:0%
what's the status of the project well we
have<00:17:47.080><c> him</c><00:17:47.200><c> working</c><00:17:47.440><c> very</c><00:17:48.070><c> hard</c><00:17:48.370><c> for</c><00:17:48.700><c> the</c><00:17:49.030><c> last</c>

00:17:49.370 --> 00:17:49.380 align:start position:0%
have him working very hard for the last
 

00:17:49.380 --> 00:17:52.050 align:start position:0%
have him working very hard for the last
four<00:17:50.380><c> five</c><00:17:50.710><c> months</c><00:17:51.070><c> so</c><00:17:51.430><c> it's</c><00:17:51.580><c> a</c><00:17:51.670><c> very</c><00:17:51.880><c> young</c>

00:17:52.050 --> 00:17:52.060 align:start position:0%
four five months so it's a very young
 

00:17:52.060 --> 00:17:55.860 align:start position:0%
four five months so it's a very young
project<00:17:52.570><c> right</c><00:17:52.750><c> now</c><00:17:52.780><c> but</c><00:17:54.150><c> what</c><00:17:55.150><c> what</c><00:17:55.540><c> we</c><00:17:55.690><c> have</c>

00:17:55.860 --> 00:17:55.870 align:start position:0%
project right now but what what we have
 

00:17:55.870 --> 00:17:57.480 align:start position:0%
project right now but what what we have
a<00:17:55.900><c> chief</c><00:17:56.170><c> right</c><00:17:56.380><c> now</c><00:17:56.500><c> we</c><00:17:56.680><c> already</c><00:17:56.830><c> have</c><00:17:57.070><c> a</c>

00:17:57.480 --> 00:17:57.490 align:start position:0%
a chief right now we already have a
 

00:17:57.490 --> 00:18:01.980 align:start position:0%
a chief right now we already have a
fully<00:17:57.730><c> functional</c><00:17:58.560><c> wallet</c><00:17:59.970><c> wallet</c><00:18:00.970><c> four</c><00:18:01.390><c> four</c>

00:18:01.980 --> 00:18:01.990 align:start position:0%
fully functional wallet wallet four four
 

00:18:01.990 --> 00:18:04.410 align:start position:0%
fully functional wallet wallet four four
identities<00:18:02.190><c> where</c><00:18:03.190><c> you</c><00:18:03.310><c> can</c><00:18:03.520><c> see</c><00:18:03.790><c> where</c><00:18:04.300><c> you</c>

00:18:04.410 --> 00:18:04.420 align:start position:0%
identities where you can see where you
 

00:18:04.420 --> 00:18:06.960 align:start position:0%
identities where you can see where you
can<00:18:04.450><c> create</c><00:18:05.410><c> your</c><00:18:05.590><c> identities</c><00:18:06.160><c> you</c><00:18:06.460><c> can</c><00:18:06.700><c> do</c>

00:18:06.960 --> 00:18:06.970 align:start position:0%
can create your identities you can do
 

00:18:06.970 --> 00:18:08.640 align:start position:0%
can create your identities you can do
start<00:18:07.330><c> doing</c><00:18:07.540><c> claims</c><00:18:07.810><c> checking</c><00:18:08.290><c> the</c><00:18:08.410><c> claims</c>

00:18:08.640 --> 00:18:08.650 align:start position:0%
start doing claims checking the claims
 

00:18:08.650 --> 00:18:11.670 align:start position:0%
start doing claims checking the claims
proving<00:18:09.550><c> the</c><00:18:09.640><c> claims</c><00:18:09.880><c> and</c><00:18:10.180><c> so</c><00:18:10.300><c> on</c><00:18:10.450><c> we</c><00:18:11.440><c> have</c><00:18:11.470><c> a</c>

00:18:11.670 --> 00:18:11.680 align:start position:0%
proving the claims and so on we have a
 

00:18:11.680 --> 00:18:14.070 align:start position:0%
proving the claims and so on we have a
relator<00:18:12.100><c> right</c><00:18:12.700><c> now</c><00:18:12.880><c> is</c><00:18:13.090><c> still</c><00:18:13.360><c> a</c><00:18:13.390><c> trusted</c><00:18:13.900><c> for</c>

00:18:14.070 --> 00:18:14.080 align:start position:0%
relator right now is still a trusted for
 

00:18:14.080 --> 00:18:16.620 align:start position:0%
relator right now is still a trusted for
layer<00:18:14.200><c> and</c><00:18:14.560><c> we</c><00:18:15.340><c> have</c><00:18:15.550><c> been</c><00:18:15.730><c> working</c><00:18:15.910><c> also</c><00:18:16.480><c> in</c>

00:18:16.620 --> 00:18:16.630 align:start position:0%
layer and we have been working also in
 

00:18:16.630 --> 00:18:18.900 align:start position:0%
layer and we have been working also in
the<00:18:16.780><c> zero-knowledge</c><00:18:17.230><c> technology</c><00:18:18.070><c> for</c><00:18:18.790><c> the</c>

00:18:18.900 --> 00:18:18.910 align:start position:0%
the zero-knowledge technology for the
 

00:18:18.910 --> 00:18:21.150 align:start position:0%
the zero-knowledge technology for the
zero-knowledge<00:18:19.300><c> technology</c><00:18:20.050><c> we</c><00:18:20.470><c> just</c><00:18:20.650><c> live</c>

00:18:21.150 --> 00:18:21.160 align:start position:0%
zero-knowledge technology we just live
 

00:18:21.160 --> 00:18:22.800 align:start position:0%
zero-knowledge technology we just live
right<00:18:21.190><c> now</c><00:18:21.490><c> just</c><00:18:21.760><c> created</c><00:18:22.120><c> a</c><00:18:22.180><c> couple</c><00:18:22.390><c> of</c><00:18:22.570><c> tools</c>

00:18:22.800 --> 00:18:22.810 align:start position:0%
right now just created a couple of tools
 

00:18:22.810 --> 00:18:25.590 align:start position:0%
right now just created a couple of tools
one<00:18:23.470><c> is</c><00:18:23.650><c> a</c><00:18:24.090><c> circuit</c><00:18:25.090><c> compiler</c>

00:18:25.590 --> 00:18:25.600 align:start position:0%
one is a circuit compiler
 

00:18:25.600 --> 00:18:28.980 align:start position:0%
one is a circuit compiler
it's<00:18:26.200><c> a</c><00:18:26.380><c> compressor</c><00:18:27.100><c> well</c><00:18:27.820><c> it</c><00:18:27.940><c> just</c><00:18:27.970><c> is</c><00:18:28.270><c> a</c><00:18:28.300><c> it's</c>

00:18:28.980 --> 00:18:28.990 align:start position:0%
it's a compressor well it just is a it's
 

00:18:28.990 --> 00:18:31.640 align:start position:0%
it's a compressor well it just is a it's
a<00:18:29.170><c> language</c><00:18:29.590><c> where</c><00:18:30.070><c> you</c><00:18:30.160><c> can</c><00:18:30.400><c> create</c>

00:18:31.640 --> 00:18:31.650 align:start position:0%
a language where you can create
 

00:18:31.650 --> 00:18:35.610 align:start position:0%
a language where you can create
zero-knowledge<00:18:32.820><c> circuits</c><00:18:33.820><c> and</c><00:18:34.270><c> you</c><00:18:34.960><c> can</c><00:18:35.290><c> and</c>

00:18:35.610 --> 00:18:35.620 align:start position:0%
zero-knowledge circuits and you can and
 

00:18:35.620 --> 00:18:38.340 align:start position:0%
zero-knowledge circuits and you can and
and<00:18:36.280><c> then</c><00:18:36.940><c> we</c><00:18:37.330><c> have</c><00:18:37.480><c> another</c><00:18:37.750><c> tool</c><00:18:38.110><c> that's</c>

00:18:38.340 --> 00:18:38.350 align:start position:0%
and then we have another tool that's
 

00:18:38.350 --> 00:18:40.860 align:start position:0%
and then we have another tool that's
called<00:18:38.770><c> snarky</c><00:18:39.400><c> I</c><00:18:39.490><c> guess</c><00:18:39.670><c> it's</c><00:18:39.940><c> just</c><00:18:40.150><c> a</c><00:18:40.330><c> simple</c>

00:18:40.860 --> 00:18:40.870 align:start position:0%
called snarky I guess it's just a simple
 

00:18:40.870 --> 00:18:44.580 align:start position:0%
called snarky I guess it's just a simple
JavaScript<00:18:41.760><c> implementation</c><00:18:42.760><c> of</c><00:18:43.750><c> the</c><00:18:43.990><c> of</c><00:18:44.350><c> the</c>

00:18:44.580 --> 00:18:44.590 align:start position:0%
JavaScript implementation of the of the
 

00:18:44.590 --> 00:18:49.350 align:start position:0%
JavaScript implementation of the of the
Zetas<00:18:45.010><c> narcs</c><00:18:47.280><c> right</c><00:18:48.280><c> now</c><00:18:48.460><c> currently</c><00:18:49.030><c> we</c><00:18:49.090><c> are</c>

00:18:49.350 --> 00:18:49.360 align:start position:0%
Zetas narcs right now currently we are
 

00:18:49.360 --> 00:18:52.530 align:start position:0%
Zetas narcs right now currently we are
working<00:18:49.390><c> hard</c><00:18:49.960><c> in</c><00:18:50.290><c> trying</c><00:18:50.590><c> to</c><00:18:50.790><c> scale</c><00:18:51.790><c> the</c>

00:18:52.530 --> 00:18:52.540 align:start position:0%
working hard in trying to scale the
 

00:18:52.540 --> 00:18:55.800 align:start position:0%
working hard in trying to scale the
generation<00:18:53.230><c> of</c><00:18:53.380><c> Zika</c><00:18:53.740><c> snarks</c><00:18:54.190><c> proof</c><00:18:54.940><c> we</c><00:18:55.660><c> are</c>

00:18:55.800 --> 00:18:55.810 align:start position:0%
generation of Zika snarks proof we are
 

00:18:55.810 --> 00:18:57.810 align:start position:0%
generation of Zika snarks proof we are
working<00:18:56.050><c> with</c><00:18:56.530><c> different</c><00:18:57.160><c> people</c><00:18:57.520><c> in</c><00:18:57.730><c> the</c>

00:18:57.810 --> 00:18:57.820 align:start position:0%
working with different people in the
 

00:18:57.820 --> 00:19:01.230 align:start position:0%
working with different people in the
community<00:18:58.180><c> and</c><00:18:58.300><c> so</c><00:18:58.510><c> on</c><00:18:59.760><c> mainly</c><00:19:00.760><c> the</c><00:19:00.850><c> idea</c><00:19:00.880><c> is</c>

00:19:01.230 --> 00:19:01.240 align:start position:0%
community and so on mainly the idea is
 

00:19:01.240 --> 00:19:05.060 align:start position:0%
community and so on mainly the idea is
to<00:19:01.450><c> try</c><00:19:01.750><c> to</c><00:19:02.190><c> or</c><00:19:03.190><c> goal</c><00:19:03.490><c> right</c><00:19:03.730><c> now</c><00:19:03.760><c> is</c><00:19:03.910><c> to</c><00:19:04.120><c> create</c>

00:19:05.060 --> 00:19:05.070 align:start position:0%
to try to or goal right now is to create
 

00:19:05.070 --> 00:19:08.130 align:start position:0%
to try to or goal right now is to create
1<00:19:06.070><c> billion</c><00:19:06.340><c> constraints</c><00:19:07.270><c> in</c><00:19:07.450><c> 10</c><00:19:07.720><c> seconds</c>

00:19:08.130 --> 00:19:08.140 align:start position:0%
1 billion constraints in 10 seconds
 

00:19:08.140 --> 00:19:10.230 align:start position:0%
1 billion constraints in 10 seconds
that's<00:19:08.380><c> our</c><00:19:08.530><c> goal</c><00:19:08.830><c> and</c><00:19:08.980><c> we</c><00:19:09.550><c> are</c><00:19:09.670><c> working</c><00:19:10.060><c> with</c>

00:19:10.230 --> 00:19:10.240 align:start position:0%
that's our goal and we are working with
 

00:19:10.240 --> 00:19:12.890 align:start position:0%
that's our goal and we are working with
different<00:19:10.540><c> technologies</c><00:19:11.380><c> GPU</c><00:19:11.920><c> FPGAs</c><00:19:12.640><c> and</c>

00:19:12.890 --> 00:19:12.900 align:start position:0%
different technologies GPU FPGAs and
 

00:19:12.900 --> 00:19:15.030 align:start position:0%
different technologies GPU FPGAs and
different<00:19:13.900><c> technologies</c><00:19:14.320><c> and</c><00:19:14.530><c> seeing</c><00:19:14.830><c> and</c>

00:19:15.030 --> 00:19:15.040 align:start position:0%
different technologies and seeing and
 

00:19:15.040 --> 00:19:16.470 align:start position:0%
different technologies and seeing and
trying<00:19:15.250><c> to</c><00:19:15.340><c> check</c><00:19:15.520><c> which</c><00:19:15.730><c> one</c><00:19:15.940><c> is</c><00:19:16.180><c> the</c><00:19:16.330><c> best</c>

00:19:16.470 --> 00:19:16.480 align:start position:0%
trying to check which one is the best
 

00:19:16.480 --> 00:19:20.610 align:start position:0%
trying to check which one is the best
one<00:19:16.630><c> for</c><00:19:17.050><c> that</c><00:19:17.790><c> and</c><00:19:18.790><c> that's</c><00:19:19.270><c> mainly</c><00:19:19.870><c> my</c>

00:19:20.610 --> 00:19:20.620 align:start position:0%
one for that and that's mainly my
 

00:19:20.620 --> 00:19:24.170 align:start position:0%
one for that and that's mainly my
presentation<00:19:21.340><c> here</c><00:19:21.730><c> are</c><00:19:21.960><c> some</c><00:19:22.960><c> takeaways</c>

00:19:24.170 --> 00:19:24.180 align:start position:0%
presentation here are some takeaways
 

00:19:24.180 --> 00:19:27.120 align:start position:0%
presentation here are some takeaways
self<00:19:25.180><c> sobering</c><00:19:25.510><c> and</c><00:19:25.630><c> identity</c><00:19:26.050><c> should</c><00:19:26.950><c> be</c><00:19:27.100><c> a</c>

00:19:27.120 --> 00:19:27.130 align:start position:0%
self sobering and identity should be a
 

00:19:27.130 --> 00:19:31.710 align:start position:0%
self sobering and identity should be a
scalable<00:19:27.670><c> privacy</c><00:19:28.660><c> by</c><00:19:28.780><c> design</c><00:19:30.150><c> have</c><00:19:31.150><c> we</c><00:19:31.510><c> have</c>

00:19:31.710 --> 00:19:31.720 align:start position:0%
scalable privacy by design have we have
 

00:19:31.720 --> 00:19:33.380 align:start position:0%
scalable privacy by design have we have
this<00:19:31.930><c> wallet</c><00:19:32.200><c> and</c><00:19:32.440><c> this</c><00:19:32.590><c> key</c><00:19:32.830><c> management</c>

00:19:33.380 --> 00:19:33.390 align:start position:0%
this wallet and this key management
 

00:19:33.390 --> 00:19:36.450 align:start position:0%
this wallet and this key management
early<00:19:34.390><c> version</c><00:19:34.810><c> if</c><00:19:35.230><c> any</c><00:19:35.560><c> of</c><00:19:35.740><c> you</c><00:19:35.920><c> is</c>

00:19:36.450 --> 00:19:36.460 align:start position:0%
early version if any of you is
 

00:19:36.460 --> 00:19:38.850 align:start position:0%
early version if any of you is
interested<00:19:37.000><c> in</c><00:19:37.120><c> checking</c><00:19:37.330><c> and</c><00:19:38.230><c> having</c><00:19:38.560><c> a</c><00:19:38.650><c> demo</c>

00:19:38.850 --> 00:19:38.860 align:start position:0%
interested in checking and having a demo
 

00:19:38.860 --> 00:19:40.590 align:start position:0%
interested in checking and having a demo
here<00:19:39.250><c> there</c><00:19:39.430><c> is</c><00:19:39.490><c> a</c><00:19:39.520><c> bunch</c><00:19:39.760><c> of</c><00:19:39.880><c> people</c><00:19:40.210><c> with</c><00:19:40.360><c> my</c>

00:19:40.590 --> 00:19:40.600 align:start position:0%
here there is a bunch of people with my
 

00:19:40.600 --> 00:19:43.590 align:start position:0%
here there is a bunch of people with my
shirt<00:19:40.870><c> there</c><00:19:41.380><c> we'll</c><00:19:41.530><c> be</c><00:19:41.680><c> glad</c><00:19:41.830><c> to</c><00:19:42.360><c> explain</c><00:19:43.360><c> it</c>

00:19:43.590 --> 00:19:43.600 align:start position:0%
shirt there we'll be glad to explain it
 

00:19:43.600 --> 00:19:47.520 align:start position:0%
shirt there we'll be glad to explain it
to<00:19:43.630><c> you</c><00:19:43.870><c> and</c><00:19:44.220><c> also</c><00:19:46.410><c> focusing</c><00:19:47.410><c> in</c>

00:19:47.520 --> 00:19:47.530 align:start position:0%
to you and also focusing in
 

00:19:47.530 --> 00:19:49.170 align:start position:0%
to you and also focusing in
standardization<00:19:48.160><c> centralization</c><00:19:48.970><c> is</c>

00:19:49.170 --> 00:19:49.180 align:start position:0%
standardization centralization is
 

00:19:49.180 --> 00:19:50.670 align:start position:0%
standardization centralization is
something<00:19:49.480><c> that</c><00:19:49.630><c> we</c><00:19:49.720><c> have</c><00:19:49.870><c> not</c><00:19:50.050><c> talked</c><00:19:50.260><c> very</c>

00:19:50.670 --> 00:19:50.680 align:start position:0%
something that we have not talked very
 

00:19:50.680 --> 00:19:55.150 align:start position:0%
something that we have not talked very
much<00:19:50.890><c> but</c><00:19:51.550><c> yeah</c><00:19:52.090><c> we</c><00:19:52.690><c> believe</c><00:19:53.200><c> that</c><00:19:53.910><c> the</c>

00:19:55.150 --> 00:19:55.160 align:start position:0%
much but yeah we believe that the
 

00:19:55.160 --> 00:19:57.070 align:start position:0%
much but yeah we believe that the
the<00:19:55.309><c> system</c><00:19:55.669><c> should</c><00:19:55.880><c> be</c><00:19:55.910><c> very</c><00:19:56.600><c> standardized</c>

00:19:57.070 --> 00:19:57.080 align:start position:0%
the system should be very standardized
 

00:19:57.080 --> 00:19:59.020 align:start position:0%
the system should be very standardized
that's<00:19:57.410><c> why</c><00:19:57.710><c> we</c><00:19:58.190><c> are</c><00:19:58.370><c> just</c><00:19:58.700><c> an</c><00:19:58.820><c> association</c>

00:19:59.020 --> 00:19:59.030 align:start position:0%
that's why we are just an association
 

00:19:59.030 --> 00:20:01.690 align:start position:0%
that's why we are just an association
it's<00:19:59.539><c> an</c><00:19:59.630><c> open-source</c><00:20:00.049><c> project</c><00:20:00.200><c> and</c><00:20:00.679><c> we</c><00:20:01.340><c> want</c>

00:20:01.690 --> 00:20:01.700 align:start position:0%
it's an open-source project and we want
 

00:20:01.700 --> 00:20:04.150 align:start position:0%
it's an open-source project and we want
to<00:20:01.940><c> work</c><00:20:02.450><c> and</c><00:20:02.750><c> contribute</c><00:20:03.020><c> as</c><00:20:03.380><c> much</c><00:20:03.410><c> as</c><00:20:03.799><c> we</c><00:20:03.950><c> can</c>

00:20:04.150 --> 00:20:04.160 align:start position:0%
to work and contribute as much as we can
 

00:20:04.160 --> 00:20:07.840 align:start position:0%
to work and contribute as much as we can
to<00:20:04.460><c> a</c><00:20:04.789><c> world</c><00:20:05.150><c> where</c><00:20:06.309><c> everything</c><00:20:07.309><c> is</c><00:20:07.490><c> more</c><00:20:07.730><c> or</c>

00:20:07.840 --> 00:20:07.850 align:start position:0%
to a world where everything is more or
 

00:20:07.850 --> 00:20:09.250 align:start position:0%
to a world where everything is more or
less<00:20:08.000><c> than</c><00:20:08.270><c> the</c><00:20:08.360><c> rights</c><00:20:08.510><c> and</c><00:20:08.780><c> the</c><00:20:08.900><c> system's</c>

00:20:09.250 --> 00:20:09.260 align:start position:0%
less than the rights and the system's
 

00:20:09.260 --> 00:20:10.539 align:start position:0%
less than the rights and the system's
connects<00:20:09.620><c> one</c><00:20:10.010><c> each</c><00:20:10.160><c> other</c>

00:20:10.539 --> 00:20:10.549 align:start position:0%
connects one each other
 

00:20:10.549 --> 00:20:20.760 align:start position:0%
connects one each other
and<00:20:10.640><c> that's</c><00:20:11.150><c> my</c><00:20:11.240><c> presentation</c><00:20:11.660><c> thank</c><00:20:12.500><c> you</c>

00:20:20.760 --> 00:20:20.770 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:20:20.770 --> 00:20:27.820 align:start position:0%
 
yeah<00:20:25.330><c> we</c><00:20:26.330><c> have</c><00:20:26.540><c> a</c><00:20:26.570><c> fair</c><00:20:27.200><c> amount</c><00:20:27.290><c> of</c><00:20:27.470><c> time</c><00:20:27.650><c> for</c>

00:20:27.820 --> 00:20:27.830 align:start position:0%
yeah we have a fair amount of time for
 

00:20:27.830 --> 00:20:35.080 align:start position:0%
yeah we have a fair amount of time for
questions<00:20:28.160><c> if</c><00:20:28.460><c> anyone</c><00:20:28.700><c> has</c><00:20:28.820><c> to</c><00:20:29.000><c> me</c><00:20:33.790><c> yeah</c><00:20:34.790><c> I</c>

00:20:35.080 --> 00:20:35.090 align:start position:0%
questions if anyone has to me yeah I
 

00:20:35.090 --> 00:20:37.030 align:start position:0%
questions if anyone has to me yeah I
just<00:20:35.240><c> came</c><00:20:35.540><c> back</c><00:20:36.020><c> from</c><00:20:36.260><c> the</c><00:20:36.440><c> internet</c>

00:20:37.030 --> 00:20:37.040 align:start position:0%
just came back from the internet
 

00:20:37.040 --> 00:20:39.250 align:start position:0%
just came back from the internet
identity<00:20:37.190><c> workshop</c><00:20:37.880><c> in</c><00:20:38.120><c> California</c><00:20:39.110><c> and</c><00:20:39.200><c> it</c>

00:20:39.250 --> 00:20:39.260 align:start position:0%
identity workshop in California and it
 

00:20:39.260 --> 00:20:40.930 align:start position:0%
identity workshop in California and it
was<00:20:39.380><c> great</c><00:20:39.740><c> it</c><00:20:39.920><c> seems</c><00:20:40.070><c> like</c><00:20:40.280><c> a</c><00:20:40.460><c> lot</c><00:20:40.790><c> of</c><00:20:40.880><c> these</c>

00:20:40.930 --> 00:20:40.940 align:start position:0%
was great it seems like a lot of these
 

00:20:40.940 --> 00:20:42.010 align:start position:0%
was great it seems like a lot of these
conversations<00:20:41.180><c> are</c><00:20:41.630><c> happening</c><00:20:41.750><c> around</c>

00:20:42.010 --> 00:20:42.020 align:start position:0%
conversations are happening around
 

00:20:42.020 --> 00:20:43.480 align:start position:0%
conversations are happening around
identity<00:20:42.410><c> in</c><00:20:42.620><c> the</c><00:20:42.710><c> internet</c><00:20:43.070><c> right</c><00:20:43.190><c> now</c><00:20:43.220><c> it's</c>

00:20:43.480 --> 00:20:43.490 align:start position:0%
identity in the internet right now it's
 

00:20:43.490 --> 00:20:46.440 align:start position:0%
identity in the internet right now it's
awesome<00:20:43.610><c> I</c><00:20:43.970><c> was</c><00:20:44.390><c> curious</c><00:20:44.630><c> if</c><00:20:44.840><c> I'd</c><00:20:45.560><c> entry</c><00:20:46.010><c> has</c>

00:20:46.440 --> 00:20:46.450 align:start position:0%
awesome I was curious if I'd entry has
 

00:20:46.450 --> 00:20:50.080 align:start position:0%
awesome I was curious if I'd entry has
an<00:20:47.450><c> D</c><00:20:48.140><c> ID</c><00:20:48.290><c> method</c><00:20:48.860><c> so</c><00:20:49.400><c> be</c><00:20:49.550><c> compatible</c><00:20:49.790><c> with</c><00:20:50.000><c> the</c>

00:20:50.080 --> 00:20:50.090 align:start position:0%
an D ID method so be compatible with the
 

00:20:50.090 --> 00:20:54.940 align:start position:0%
an D ID method so be compatible with the
ID<00:20:50.360><c> spec</c><00:20:51.370><c> yeah</c><00:20:52.370><c> the</c><00:20:52.910><c> ID</c><00:20:53.030><c> is</c><00:20:53.300><c> just</c><00:20:53.660><c> standard</c><00:20:54.620><c> for</c>

00:20:54.940 --> 00:20:54.950 align:start position:0%
ID spec yeah the ID is just standard for
 

00:20:54.950 --> 00:20:57.430 align:start position:0%
ID spec yeah the ID is just standard for
referring<00:20:55.430><c> to</c><00:20:55.640><c> the</c><00:20:55.820><c> identities</c><00:20:56.360><c> of</c><00:20:56.870><c> course</c>

00:20:57.430 --> 00:20:57.440 align:start position:0%
referring to the identities of course
 

00:20:57.440 --> 00:20:59.800 align:start position:0%
referring to the identities of course
it's<00:20:57.680><c> absolutely</c><00:20:58.190><c> compatible</c><00:20:58.520><c> because</c><00:20:59.090><c> even</c>

00:20:59.800 --> 00:20:59.810 align:start position:0%
it's absolutely compatible because even
 

00:20:59.810 --> 00:21:02.820 align:start position:0%
it's absolutely compatible because even
there<00:20:59.960><c> are</c><00:21:00.020><c> some</c><00:21:00.260><c> specific</c><00:21:01.010><c> standards</c><00:21:01.760><c> for</c><00:21:02.060><c> a</c>

00:21:02.820 --> 00:21:02.830 align:start position:0%
there are some specific standards for a
 

00:21:02.830 --> 00:21:07.180 align:start position:0%
there are some specific standards for a
theory<00:21:03.830><c> based</c><00:21:04.100><c> kind</c><00:21:04.760><c> identities</c><00:21:05.600><c> so</c><00:21:06.140><c> yes</c><00:21:06.860><c> it's</c>

00:21:07.180 --> 00:21:07.190 align:start position:0%
theory based kind identities so yes it's
 

00:21:07.190 --> 00:21:09.250 align:start position:0%
theory based kind identities so yes it's
I<00:21:07.580><c> would</c><00:21:07.850><c> say</c><00:21:07.970><c> that</c><00:21:08.330><c> the</c><00:21:08.450><c> current</c><00:21:08.630><c> standards</c>

00:21:09.250 --> 00:21:09.260 align:start position:0%
I would say that the current standards
 

00:21:09.260 --> 00:21:12.910 align:start position:0%
I would say that the current standards
are<00:21:09.940><c> appliable</c><00:21:10.940><c> the</c><00:21:11.900><c> main</c><00:21:12.110><c> problem</c><00:21:12.590><c> of</c><00:21:12.740><c> the</c>

00:21:12.910 --> 00:21:12.920 align:start position:0%
are appliable the main problem of the
 

00:21:12.920 --> 00:21:14.980 align:start position:0%
are appliable the main problem of the
current<00:21:13.250><c> standards</c><00:21:13.460><c> is</c><00:21:13.910><c> that</c><00:21:13.970><c> all</c><00:21:14.510><c> these</c><00:21:14.690><c> zero</c>

00:21:14.980 --> 00:21:14.990 align:start position:0%
current standards is that all these zero
 

00:21:14.990 --> 00:21:18.550 align:start position:0%
current standards is that all these zero
knowledge<00:21:15.200><c> technology</c><00:21:16.010><c> is</c><00:21:16.370><c> not</c><00:21:17.410><c> it's</c><00:21:18.410><c> not</c>

00:21:18.550 --> 00:21:18.560 align:start position:0%
knowledge technology is not it's not
 

00:21:18.560 --> 00:21:23.200 align:start position:0%
knowledge technology is not it's not
very<00:21:18.860><c> much</c><00:21:19.100><c> on</c><00:21:19.520><c> their</c><00:21:19.880><c> mind</c><00:21:20.210><c> and</c><00:21:20.590><c> you</c><00:21:21.590><c> know</c><00:21:22.210><c> for</c>

00:21:23.200 --> 00:21:23.210 align:start position:0%
very much on their mind and you know for
 

00:21:23.210 --> 00:21:24.910 align:start position:0%
very much on their mind and you know for
example<00:21:23.300><c> it</c><00:21:23.600><c> makes</c><00:21:23.750><c> no</c><00:21:23.960><c> sense</c><00:21:24.230><c> at</c><00:21:24.440><c> all</c><00:21:24.530><c> to</c><00:21:24.560><c> put</c>

00:21:24.910 --> 00:21:24.920 align:start position:0%
example it makes no sense at all to put
 

00:21:24.920 --> 00:21:28.270 align:start position:0%
example it makes no sense at all to put
a<00:21:24.980><c> jsonparser</c><00:21:25.550><c> inserted</c><00:21:26.450><c> inside</c><00:21:26.900><c> the</c><00:21:27.830><c> cosmic</c>

00:21:28.270 --> 00:21:28.280 align:start position:0%
a jsonparser inserted inside the cosmic
 

00:21:28.280 --> 00:21:31.240 align:start position:0%
a jsonparser inserted inside the cosmic
circuit<00:21:28.670><c> so</c><00:21:29.300><c> I</c><00:21:29.630><c> would</c><00:21:30.320><c> say</c><00:21:30.530><c> that</c><00:21:30.560><c> there</c><00:21:31.130><c> are</c>

00:21:31.240 --> 00:21:31.250 align:start position:0%
circuit so I would say that there are
 

00:21:31.250 --> 00:21:34.300 align:start position:0%
circuit so I would say that there are
some<00:21:31.490><c> modifications</c><00:21:31.760><c> and</c><00:21:32.600><c> some</c><00:21:33.190><c> adoptions</c><00:21:34.190><c> to</c>

00:21:34.300 --> 00:21:34.310 align:start position:0%
some modifications and some adoptions to
 

00:21:34.310 --> 00:21:36.690 align:start position:0%
some modifications and some adoptions to
those<00:21:34.460><c> standards</c><00:21:34.940><c> that</c><00:21:35.240><c> we</c><00:21:35.420><c> we</c><00:21:35.870><c> need</c><00:21:36.080><c> to</c><00:21:36.200><c> take</c>

00:21:36.690 --> 00:21:36.700 align:start position:0%
those standards that we we need to take
 

00:21:36.700 --> 00:21:40.090 align:start position:0%
those standards that we we need to take
with<00:21:37.700><c> we</c><00:21:38.270><c> need</c><00:21:38.450><c> to</c><00:21:38.570><c> take</c><00:21:38.720><c> B</c><00:21:38.930><c> in</c><00:21:39.140><c> account</c><00:21:39.620><c> in</c>

00:21:40.090 --> 00:21:40.100 align:start position:0%
with we need to take B in account in
 

00:21:40.100 --> 00:21:43.410 align:start position:0%
with we need to take B in account in
order<00:21:40.310><c> to</c><00:21:40.520><c> adapt</c><00:21:40.910><c> to</c><00:21:40.940><c> this</c><00:21:41.300><c> new</c><00:21:41.360><c> kind</c><00:21:41.930><c> of</c>

00:21:43.410 --> 00:21:43.420 align:start position:0%
order to adapt to this new kind of
 

00:21:43.420 --> 00:21:50.650 align:start position:0%
order to adapt to this new kind of
identities<00:21:47.590><c> so</c><00:21:48.590><c> for</c><00:21:49.400><c> application</c><00:21:50.180><c> developers</c>

00:21:50.650 --> 00:21:50.660 align:start position:0%
identities so for application developers
 

00:21:50.660 --> 00:21:56.170 align:start position:0%
identities so for application developers
what<00:21:50.900><c> can</c><00:21:51.080><c> we</c><00:21:51.200><c> use</c><00:21:54.160><c> yeah</c><00:21:55.160><c> we</c><00:21:55.400><c> have</c><00:21:55.580><c> a</c><00:21:55.610><c> we</c><00:21:56.150><c> are</c>

00:21:56.170 --> 00:21:56.180 align:start position:0%
what can we use yeah we have a we are
 

00:21:56.180 --> 00:21:59.170 align:start position:0%
what can we use yeah we have a we are
building<00:21:56.990><c> III</c><00:21:57.770><c> think</c><00:21:58.220><c> it's</c><00:21:58.520><c> quite</c><00:21:58.790><c> ready</c><00:21:59.090><c> but</c>

00:21:59.170 --> 00:21:59.180 align:start position:0%
building III think it's quite ready but
 

00:21:59.180 --> 00:22:02.200 align:start position:0%
building III think it's quite ready but
we're<00:21:59.900><c> building</c><00:22:00.140><c> mainly</c><00:22:00.620><c> an</c><00:22:00.710><c> SDK</c><00:22:01.250><c> where</c><00:22:01.940><c> all</c>

00:22:02.200 --> 00:22:02.210 align:start position:0%
we're building mainly an SDK where all
 

00:22:02.210 --> 00:22:06.280 align:start position:0%
we're building mainly an SDK where all
these<00:22:02.540><c> all</c><00:22:03.440><c> these</c><00:22:03.680><c> basic</c><00:22:04.490><c> functions</c><00:22:04.850><c> of</c><00:22:05.450><c> you</c>

00:22:06.280 --> 00:22:06.290 align:start position:0%
these all these basic functions of you
 

00:22:06.290 --> 00:22:08.080 align:start position:0%
these all these basic functions of you
know<00:22:06.380><c> creating</c><00:22:06.800><c> an</c><00:22:06.890><c> identity</c><00:22:07.250><c> creating</c><00:22:08.000><c> a</c>

00:22:08.080 --> 00:22:08.090 align:start position:0%
know creating an identity creating a
 

00:22:08.090 --> 00:22:11.950 align:start position:0%
know creating an identity creating a
claim<00:22:08.920><c> very</c><00:22:09.920><c> proving</c><00:22:10.580><c> a</c><00:22:10.640><c> claim</c><00:22:10.940><c> all</c><00:22:11.300><c> that</c>

00:22:11.950 --> 00:22:11.960 align:start position:0%
claim very proving a claim all that
 

00:22:11.960 --> 00:22:14.920 align:start position:0%
claim very proving a claim all that
should<00:22:12.230><c> be</c><00:22:12.440><c> embed</c><00:22:13.070><c> as</c><00:22:14.030><c> a</c><00:22:14.090><c> black</c><00:22:14.510><c> box</c>

00:22:14.920 --> 00:22:14.930 align:start position:0%
should be embed as a black box
 

00:22:14.930 --> 00:22:17.050 align:start position:0%
should be embed as a black box
so<00:22:15.350><c> we</c><00:22:15.530><c> are</c><00:22:15.650><c> working</c><00:22:15.800><c> in</c><00:22:16.160><c> this</c><00:22:16.370><c> library</c><00:22:16.700><c> in</c>

00:22:17.050 --> 00:22:17.060 align:start position:0%
so we are working in this library in
 

00:22:17.060 --> 00:22:20.170 align:start position:0%
so we are working in this library in
this<00:22:17.210><c> SDK</c><00:22:17.720><c> where</c><00:22:18.410><c> applications</c><00:22:19.040><c> will</c><00:22:19.760><c> be</c><00:22:19.790><c> able</c>

00:22:20.170 --> 00:22:20.180 align:start position:0%
this SDK where applications will be able
 

00:22:20.180 --> 00:22:23.740 align:start position:0%
this SDK where applications will be able
to<00:22:20.480><c> build</c><00:22:20.690><c> on</c><00:22:20.930><c> that</c><00:22:21.580><c> or</c><00:22:22.580><c> goal</c><00:22:22.910><c> for</c><00:22:23.240><c> example</c><00:22:23.330><c> or</c>

00:22:23.740 --> 00:22:23.750 align:start position:0%
to build on that or goal for example or
 

00:22:23.750 --> 00:22:25.690 align:start position:0%
to build on that or goal for example or
applicator<00:22:24.200><c> that</c><00:22:24.440><c> but</c><00:22:25.310><c> the</c><00:22:25.460><c> wallet</c>

00:22:25.690 --> 00:22:25.700 align:start position:0%
applicator that but the wallet
 

00:22:25.700 --> 00:22:26.980 align:start position:0%
applicator that but the wallet
application<00:22:26.300><c> is</c><00:22:26.450><c> just</c><00:22:26.720><c> a</c><00:22:26.810><c> reference</c>

00:22:26.980 --> 00:22:26.990 align:start position:0%
application is just a reference
 

00:22:26.990 --> 00:22:29.470 align:start position:0%
application is just a reference
application<00:22:27.440><c> we</c><00:22:28.100><c> are</c><00:22:28.130><c> working</c><00:22:28.670><c> very</c><00:22:28.880><c> much</c><00:22:29.090><c> in</c>

00:22:29.470 --> 00:22:29.480 align:start position:0%
application we are working very much in
 

00:22:29.480 --> 00:22:31.810 align:start position:0%
application we are working very much in
in<00:22:29.690><c> you</c><00:22:30.260><c> know</c><00:22:30.320><c> in</c><00:22:30.410><c> the</c><00:22:30.650><c> in</c><00:22:31.010><c> the</c><00:22:31.130><c> protocol</c><00:22:31.550><c> in</c>

00:22:31.810 --> 00:22:31.820 align:start position:0%
in you know in the in the protocol in
 

00:22:31.820 --> 00:22:33.540 align:start position:0%
in you know in the in the protocol in
the<00:22:31.940><c> standard</c><00:22:32.300><c> so</c><00:22:32.690><c> that</c>

00:22:33.540 --> 00:22:33.550 align:start position:0%
the standard so that
 

00:22:33.550 --> 00:22:35.490 align:start position:0%
the standard so that
you<00:22:33.640><c> know</c><00:22:33.730><c> even</c><00:22:34.150><c> if</c><00:22:34.510><c> anybody</c><00:22:34.960><c> wants</c><00:22:35.230><c> to</c><00:22:35.260><c> create</c>

00:22:35.490 --> 00:22:35.500 align:start position:0%
you know even if anybody wants to create
 

00:22:35.500 --> 00:22:37.380 align:start position:0%
you know even if anybody wants to create
an<00:22:35.650><c> application</c><00:22:35.800><c> that</c><00:22:36.190><c> horse</c><00:22:36.610><c> identity</c><00:22:37.180><c> is</c><00:22:37.240><c> in</c>

00:22:37.380 --> 00:22:37.390 align:start position:0%
an application that horse identity is in
 

00:22:37.390 --> 00:22:39.090 align:start position:0%
an application that horse identity is in
that<00:22:37.510><c> side</c><00:22:37.780><c> that</c><00:22:38.380><c> should</c><00:22:38.560><c> be</c><00:22:38.680><c> perfectly</c>

00:22:39.090 --> 00:22:39.100 align:start position:0%
that side that should be perfectly
 

00:22:39.100 --> 00:22:46.050 align:start position:0%
that side that should be perfectly
possible<00:22:39.310><c> i</c><00:22:42.660><c> cost</c><00:22:43.660><c> revere</c><00:22:43.960><c> Anahuac</c><00:22:45.060><c> imagine</c>

00:22:46.050 --> 00:22:46.060 align:start position:0%
possible i cost revere Anahuac imagine
 

00:22:46.060 --> 00:22:49.020 align:start position:0%
possible i cost revere Anahuac imagine
the<00:22:46.120><c> use</c><00:22:46.240><c> of</c><00:22:46.420><c> Zika</c><00:22:46.810><c> starts</c><00:22:47.170><c> to</c><00:22:47.940><c> alleviate</c><00:22:48.940><c> this</c>

00:22:49.020 --> 00:22:49.030 align:start position:0%
the use of Zika starts to alleviate this
 

00:22:49.030 --> 00:22:51.450 align:start position:0%
the use of Zika starts to alleviate this
sort<00:22:49.210><c> of</c><00:22:49.270><c> trusted</c><00:22:49.630><c> relayer</c><00:22:49.930><c> set</c><00:22:50.230><c> up</c><00:22:50.320><c> ZK</c><00:22:51.190><c> starks</c>

00:22:51.450 --> 00:22:51.460 align:start position:0%
sort of trusted relayer set up ZK starks
 

00:22:51.460 --> 00:22:53.040 align:start position:0%
sort of trusted relayer set up ZK starks
require<00:22:51.700><c> the</c><00:22:51.880><c> trusted</c><00:22:52.330><c> set</c><00:22:52.510><c> up</c><00:22:52.630><c> is</c><00:22:52.840><c> that</c><00:22:53.020><c> a</c>

00:22:53.040 --> 00:22:53.050 align:start position:0%
require the trusted set up is that a
 

00:22:53.050 --> 00:22:54.990 align:start position:0%
require the trusted set up is that a
concern<00:22:53.800><c> editor</c><00:22:54.400><c> is</c><00:22:54.460><c> there</c><00:22:54.580><c> anything</c><00:22:54.700><c> like</c>

00:22:54.990 --> 00:22:55.000 align:start position:0%
concern editor is there anything like
 

00:22:55.000 --> 00:22:56.100 align:start position:0%
concern editor is there anything like
malicious<00:22:55.240><c> you</c><00:22:55.420><c> could</c><00:22:55.540><c> do</c><00:22:55.630><c> if</c><00:22:55.750><c> there</c><00:22:55.900><c> was</c><00:22:55.990><c> an</c>

00:22:56.100 --> 00:22:56.110 align:start position:0%
malicious you could do if there was an
 

00:22:56.110 --> 00:22:59.000 align:start position:0%
malicious you could do if there was an
issue<00:22:56.260><c> with</c><00:22:56.500><c> the</c><00:22:56.620><c> generation</c><00:22:57.220><c> ceremony</c><00:22:57.580><c> yeah</c>

00:22:59.000 --> 00:22:59.010 align:start position:0%
issue with the generation ceremony yeah
 

00:22:59.010 --> 00:23:01.200 align:start position:0%
issue with the generation ceremony yeah
Zika<00:23:00.010><c> stars</c><00:23:00.250><c> we</c><00:23:00.460><c> all</c><00:23:00.580><c> of</c><00:23:00.670><c> us</c><00:23:00.820><c> this</c><00:23:01.060><c> is</c><00:23:01.180><c> a</c>

00:23:01.200 --> 00:23:01.210 align:start position:0%
Zika stars we all of us this is a
 

00:23:01.210 --> 00:23:04.950 align:start position:0%
Zika stars we all of us this is a
concern<00:23:02.550><c> you</c><00:23:03.550><c> know</c><00:23:03.730><c> this</c><00:23:03.940><c> is</c><00:23:04.030><c> the</c><00:23:04.150><c> big</c><00:23:04.330><c> pretty</c>

00:23:04.950 --> 00:23:04.960 align:start position:0%
concern you know this is the big pretty
 

00:23:04.960 --> 00:23:06.510 align:start position:0%
concern you know this is the big pretty
I<00:23:05.260><c> would</c><00:23:05.410><c> say</c><00:23:05.470><c> that</c><00:23:05.740><c> the</c><00:23:05.890><c> cars</c><00:23:06.280><c> are</c><00:23:06.370><c> quite</c>

00:23:06.510 --> 00:23:06.520 align:start position:0%
I would say that the cars are quite
 

00:23:06.520 --> 00:23:08.490 align:start position:0%
I would say that the cars are quite
perfect<00:23:07.000><c> except</c><00:23:07.330><c> for</c><00:23:07.510><c> that</c><00:23:07.630><c> which</c><00:23:07.900><c> is</c><00:23:07.930><c> a</c><00:23:08.110><c> huge</c>

00:23:08.490 --> 00:23:08.500 align:start position:0%
perfect except for that which is a huge
 

00:23:08.500 --> 00:23:09.000 align:start position:0%
perfect except for that which is a huge
issue

00:23:09.000 --> 00:23:09.010 align:start position:0%
issue
 

00:23:09.010 --> 00:23:13.770 align:start position:0%
issue
so<00:23:10.410><c> yeah</c><00:23:11.670><c> just</c><00:23:12.670><c> set</c><00:23:12.910><c> up</c><00:23:13.000><c> is</c><00:23:13.150><c> a</c><00:23:13.240><c> problem</c><00:23:13.660><c> that</c>

00:23:13.770 --> 00:23:13.780 align:start position:0%
so yeah just set up is a problem that
 

00:23:13.780 --> 00:23:17.010 align:start position:0%
so yeah just set up is a problem that
you<00:23:13.900><c> have</c><00:23:14.080><c> once</c><00:23:14.380><c> we</c><00:23:14.770><c> are</c><00:23:15.100><c> thinking</c><00:23:15.640><c> in</c><00:23:16.020><c> of</c>

00:23:17.010 --> 00:23:17.020 align:start position:0%
you have once we are thinking in of
 

00:23:17.020 --> 00:23:19.310 align:start position:0%
you have once we are thinking in of
course<00:23:17.110><c> it's</c><00:23:18.040><c> something</c><00:23:18.160><c> that</c><00:23:18.460><c> we</c><00:23:18.550><c> are</c><00:23:18.700><c> start</c>

00:23:19.310 --> 00:23:19.320 align:start position:0%
course it's something that we are start
 

00:23:19.320 --> 00:23:21.960 align:start position:0%
course it's something that we are start
thinking<00:23:20.320><c> and</c><00:23:20.590><c> things</c><00:23:21.190><c> and</c><00:23:21.400><c> solutions</c><00:23:21.850><c> on</c>

00:23:21.960 --> 00:23:21.970 align:start position:0%
thinking and things and solutions on
 

00:23:21.970 --> 00:23:23.460 align:start position:0%
thinking and things and solutions on
that<00:23:22.120><c> we</c><00:23:22.360><c> have</c><00:23:22.510><c> thinking</c><00:23:22.780><c> for</c><00:23:22.930><c> example</c><00:23:22.990><c> in</c>

00:23:23.460 --> 00:23:23.470 align:start position:0%
that we have thinking for example in
 

00:23:23.470 --> 00:23:25.440 align:start position:0%
that we have thinking for example in
using<00:23:23.800><c> for</c><00:23:24.070><c> example</c><00:23:24.160><c> some</c><00:23:24.640><c> trusted</c><00:23:25.060><c> hardware</c>

00:23:25.440 --> 00:23:25.450 align:start position:0%
using for example some trusted hardware
 

00:23:25.450 --> 00:23:29.490 align:start position:0%
using for example some trusted hardware
to<00:23:25.930><c> do</c><00:23:26.080><c> these</c><00:23:26.910><c> these</c><00:23:27.910><c> ceremonies</c><00:23:28.780><c> of</c><00:23:29.050><c> course</c>

00:23:29.490 --> 00:23:29.500 align:start position:0%
to do these these ceremonies of course
 

00:23:29.500 --> 00:23:31.380 align:start position:0%
to do these these ceremonies of course
there<00:23:29.650><c> is</c><00:23:29.740><c> these</c><00:23:29.890><c> multi-party</c><00:23:30.550><c> computations</c>

00:23:31.380 --> 00:23:31.390 align:start position:0%
there is these multi-party computations
 

00:23:31.390 --> 00:23:33.840 align:start position:0%
there is these multi-party computations
on<00:23:31.690><c> that</c><00:23:31.870><c> we</c><00:23:32.260><c> need</c><00:23:32.410><c> to</c><00:23:32.530><c> automate</c><00:23:32.680><c> in</c><00:23:33.430><c> some</c><00:23:33.760><c> way</c>

00:23:33.840 --> 00:23:33.850 align:start position:0%
on that we need to automate in some way
 

00:23:33.850 --> 00:23:35.910 align:start position:0%
on that we need to automate in some way
or<00:23:33.970><c> the</c><00:23:34.000><c> other</c><00:23:34.150><c> but</c><00:23:34.870><c> the</c><00:23:34.990><c> nice</c><00:23:35.140><c> thing</c><00:23:35.170><c> of</c><00:23:35.560><c> the</c>

00:23:35.910 --> 00:23:35.920 align:start position:0%
or the other but the nice thing of the
 

00:23:35.920 --> 00:23:38.100 align:start position:0%
or the other but the nice thing of the
truce<00:23:36.520><c> is</c><00:23:36.610><c> set</c><00:23:36.760><c> up</c><00:23:36.880><c> is</c><00:23:37.030><c> that</c><00:23:37.060><c> once</c><00:23:37.570><c> you</c><00:23:37.900><c> have</c>

00:23:38.100 --> 00:23:38.110 align:start position:0%
truce is set up is that once you have
 

00:23:38.110 --> 00:23:39.720 align:start position:0%
truce is set up is that once you have
done<00:23:38.410><c> that</c><00:23:38.440><c> and</c><00:23:38.650><c> if</c><00:23:39.040><c> you</c><00:23:39.250><c> very</c><00:23:39.580><c> worried</c>

00:23:39.720 --> 00:23:39.730 align:start position:0%
done that and if you very worried
 

00:23:39.730 --> 00:23:42.120 align:start position:0%
done that and if you very worried
believes<00:23:40.180><c> in</c><00:23:40.480><c> that</c><00:23:40.630><c> ceremony</c><00:23:41.230><c> it's</c><00:23:41.620><c> valid</c>

00:23:42.120 --> 00:23:42.130 align:start position:0%
believes in that ceremony it's valid
 

00:23:42.130 --> 00:23:46.350 align:start position:0%
believes in that ceremony it's valid
then<00:23:42.850><c> the</c><00:23:43.090><c> system</c><00:23:43.510><c> is</c><00:23:43.630><c> good</c><00:23:44.560><c> forever</c><00:23:44.860><c> so</c><00:23:45.820><c> yeah</c>

00:23:46.350 --> 00:23:46.360 align:start position:0%
then the system is good forever so yeah
 

00:23:46.360 --> 00:23:48.930 align:start position:0%
then the system is good forever so yeah
we<00:23:46.570><c> are</c><00:23:46.600><c> just</c><00:23:47.440><c> analyzing</c><00:23:48.100><c> different</c><00:23:48.430><c> options</c>

00:23:48.930 --> 00:23:48.940 align:start position:0%
we are just analyzing different options
 

00:23:48.940 --> 00:23:51.620 align:start position:0%
we are just analyzing different options
of<00:23:49.060><c> that</c><00:23:49.240><c> and</c><00:23:49.510><c> yeah</c><00:23:49.930><c> that's</c><00:23:50.200><c> one</c><00:23:50.350><c> of</c><00:23:50.500><c> the</c><00:23:50.620><c> weak</c>

00:23:51.620 --> 00:23:51.630 align:start position:0%
of that and yeah that's one of the weak
 

00:23:51.630 --> 00:23:54.300 align:start position:0%
of that and yeah that's one of the weak
problems<00:23:52.630><c> there</c><00:23:53.200><c> are</c><00:23:53.230><c> there</c><00:23:53.680><c> are</c><00:23:53.800><c> also</c><00:23:53.980><c> all</c>

00:23:54.300 --> 00:23:54.310 align:start position:0%
problems there are there are also all
 

00:23:54.310 --> 00:23:57.120 align:start position:0%
problems there are there are also all
these<00:23:54.550><c> new</c><00:23:54.990><c> technologies</c><00:23:55.990><c> hysterics</c><00:23:56.950><c> for</c>

00:23:57.120 --> 00:23:57.130 align:start position:0%
these new technologies hysterics for
 

00:23:57.130 --> 00:23:58.470 align:start position:0%
these new technologies hysterics for
example<00:23:57.550><c> that</c><00:23:57.730><c> we</c><00:23:57.940><c> are</c><00:23:57.970><c> also</c><00:23:58.180><c> very</c><00:23:58.330><c> interested</c>

00:23:58.470 --> 00:23:58.480 align:start position:0%
example that we are also very interested
 

00:23:58.480 --> 00:24:02.210 align:start position:0%
example that we are also very interested
in<00:23:58.930><c> on</c><00:23:59.260><c> that</c><00:23:59.770><c> that</c><00:24:00.280><c> they</c><00:24:00.400><c> don't</c><00:24:00.520><c> require</c><00:24:00.820><c> these</c>

00:24:02.210 --> 00:24:02.220 align:start position:0%
in on that that they don't require these
 

00:24:02.220 --> 00:24:05.580 align:start position:0%
in on that that they don't require these
true<00:24:03.220><c> state</c><00:24:03.400><c> ceremonies</c><00:24:04.260><c> yeah</c><00:24:05.260><c> they</c><00:24:05.500><c> are</c>

00:24:05.580 --> 00:24:05.590 align:start position:0%
true state ceremonies yeah they are
 

00:24:05.590 --> 00:24:07.260 align:start position:0%
true state ceremonies yeah they are
quite<00:24:05.800><c> better</c><00:24:06.010><c> except</c><00:24:06.610><c> that</c><00:24:06.790><c> when</c><00:24:07.000><c> you</c><00:24:07.090><c> want</c>

00:24:07.260 --> 00:24:07.270 align:start position:0%
quite better except that when you want
 

00:24:07.270 --> 00:24:10.260 align:start position:0%
quite better except that when you want
to<00:24:07.330><c> go</c><00:24:07.510><c> on</c><00:24:07.930><c> chain</c><00:24:08.370><c> now</c><00:24:09.370><c> they</c><00:24:09.580><c> are</c><00:24:09.670><c> huge</c><00:24:10.090><c> I</c><00:24:10.240><c> think</c>

00:24:10.260 --> 00:24:10.270 align:start position:0%
to go on chain now they are huge I think
 

00:24:10.270 --> 00:24:14.880 align:start position:0%
to go on chain now they are huge I think
minimum<00:24:11.250><c> was</c><00:24:13.260><c> kilobytes</c><00:24:14.260><c> of</c><00:24:14.470><c> that</c><00:24:14.650><c> and</c>

00:24:14.880 --> 00:24:14.890 align:start position:0%
minimum was kilobytes of that and
 

00:24:14.890 --> 00:24:18.300 align:start position:0%
minimum was kilobytes of that and
putting<00:24:15.250><c> that</c><00:24:15.400><c> on</c><00:24:15.730><c> chain</c><00:24:16.620><c> at</c><00:24:17.620><c> least</c><00:24:17.950><c> right</c><00:24:18.130><c> now</c>

00:24:18.300 --> 00:24:18.310 align:start position:0%
putting that on chain at least right now
 

00:24:18.310 --> 00:24:20.910 align:start position:0%
putting that on chain at least right now
is<00:24:18.580><c> quite</c><00:24:19.510><c> a</c><00:24:19.540><c> problem</c><00:24:19.930><c> so</c><00:24:20.230><c> that's</c><00:24:20.440><c> why</c><00:24:20.620><c> we</c><00:24:20.800><c> are</c>

00:24:20.910 --> 00:24:20.920 align:start position:0%
is quite a problem so that's why we are
 

00:24:20.920 --> 00:24:23.700 align:start position:0%
is quite a problem so that's why we are
sticking<00:24:21.250><c> a</c><00:24:21.550><c> lot</c><00:24:21.730><c> in</c><00:24:21.940><c> in</c><00:24:22.720><c> the</c><00:24:22.960><c> snarks</c><00:24:23.500><c> but</c>

00:24:23.700 --> 00:24:23.710 align:start position:0%
sticking a lot in in the snarks but
 

00:24:23.710 --> 00:24:27.240 align:start position:0%
sticking a lot in in the snarks but
clearly<00:24:24.720><c> starks</c><00:24:25.720><c> is</c><00:24:25.870><c> technology</c><00:24:26.560><c> that</c><00:24:27.040><c> we</c><00:24:27.220><c> are</c>

00:24:27.240 --> 00:24:27.250 align:start position:0%
clearly starks is technology that we are
 

00:24:27.250 --> 00:24:31.350 align:start position:0%
clearly starks is technology that we are
start<00:24:27.940><c> looking</c><00:24:28.660><c> at</c><00:24:28.810><c> and</c><00:24:29.080><c> it's</c><00:24:29.620><c> a</c><00:24:29.860><c> another</c><00:24:30.820><c> zero</c>

00:24:31.350 --> 00:24:31.360 align:start position:0%
start looking at and it's a another zero
 

00:24:31.360 --> 00:24:33.570 align:start position:0%
start looking at and it's a another zero
knowledge<00:24:31.570><c> technologies</c><00:24:32.290><c> that</c><00:24:32.500><c> are</c><00:24:32.740><c> coming</c>

00:24:33.570 --> 00:24:33.580 align:start position:0%
knowledge technologies that are coming
 

00:24:33.580 --> 00:24:39.250 align:start position:0%
knowledge technologies that are coming
from<00:24:33.850><c> the</c><00:24:34.030><c> research</c><00:24:34.360><c> world</c>

00:24:39.250 --> 00:24:39.260 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:24:39.260 --> 00:24:41.680 align:start position:0%
 
there<00:24:40.100><c> was</c><00:24:40.250><c> a</c><00:24:40.280><c> someone</c><00:24:41.000><c> had</c><00:24:41.210><c> a</c><00:24:41.240><c> question</c><00:24:41.660><c> in</c>

00:24:41.680 --> 00:24:41.690 align:start position:0%
there was a someone had a question in
 

00:24:41.690 --> 00:24:57.010 align:start position:0%
there was a someone had a question in
the<00:24:41.780><c> back</c><00:24:41.809><c> who</c><00:24:42.080><c> has</c><00:24:42.200><c> a</c><00:24:42.230><c> mic</c><00:24:45.460><c> no</c><00:24:46.460><c> eats</c><00:24:46.610><c> kid</c><00:24:46.850><c> oh</c><00:24:56.020><c> hi</c>

00:24:57.010 --> 00:24:57.020 align:start position:0%
the back who has a mic no eats kid oh hi
 

00:24:57.020 --> 00:25:00.490 align:start position:0%
the back who has a mic no eats kid oh hi
maybe<00:24:57.740><c> this</c><00:24:57.919><c> is</c><00:24:58.040><c> a</c><00:24:58.270><c> longer</c><00:24:59.270><c> answer</c><00:24:59.540><c> but</c><00:25:00.020><c> I</c><00:25:00.200><c> was</c>

00:25:00.490 --> 00:25:00.500 align:start position:0%
maybe this is a longer answer but I was
 

00:25:00.500 --> 00:25:03.700 align:start position:0%
maybe this is a longer answer but I was
actually<00:25:00.710><c> unsure</c><00:25:01.640><c> how</c><00:25:01.940><c> when</c><00:25:02.870><c> the</c><00:25:03.169><c> receiver</c><00:25:03.500><c> of</c>

00:25:03.700 --> 00:25:03.710 align:start position:0%
actually unsure how when the receiver of
 

00:25:03.710 --> 00:25:06.370 align:start position:0%
actually unsure how when the receiver of
the<00:25:03.740><c> identity</c><00:25:04.309><c> he</c><00:25:05.240><c> exposes</c><00:25:05.570><c> the</c><00:25:05.809><c> information</c>

00:25:06.370 --> 00:25:06.380 align:start position:0%
the identity he exposes the information
 

00:25:06.380 --> 00:25:10.450 align:start position:0%
the identity he exposes the information
his<00:25:07.130><c> private</c><00:25:07.850><c> keys</c><00:25:08.090><c> you</c><00:25:08.570><c> were</c><00:25:08.660><c> saying</c><00:25:08.900><c> the</c><00:25:09.890><c> if</c>

00:25:10.450 --> 00:25:10.460 align:start position:0%
his private keys you were saying the if
 

00:25:10.460 --> 00:25:15.340 align:start position:0%
his private keys you were saying the if
he<00:25:10.640><c> publishes</c><00:25:10.940><c> the</c><00:25:11.210><c> identity</c><00:25:11.720><c> the</c><00:25:14.350><c> his</c>

00:25:15.340 --> 00:25:15.350 align:start position:0%
he publishes the identity the his
 

00:25:15.350 --> 00:25:17.289 align:start position:0%
he publishes the identity the his
private<00:25:15.740><c> keys</c><00:25:15.919><c> were</c><00:25:16.130><c> exposed</c><00:25:16.549><c> or</c><00:25:16.820><c> he</c><00:25:17.179><c> were</c>

00:25:17.289 --> 00:25:17.299 align:start position:0%
private keys were exposed or he were
 

00:25:17.299 --> 00:25:19.930 align:start position:0%
private keys were exposed or he were
saying<00:25:17.540><c> the</c><00:25:18.100><c> sender</c><00:25:19.100><c> of</c><00:25:19.190><c> the</c><00:25:19.280><c> identity</c><00:25:19.700><c> their</c>

00:25:19.930 --> 00:25:19.940 align:start position:0%
saying the sender of the identity their
 

00:25:19.940 --> 00:25:22.150 align:start position:0%
saying the sender of the identity their
private<00:25:20.330><c> keys</c><00:25:20.510><c> were</c><00:25:20.660><c> exposed</c><00:25:21.049><c> no</c><00:25:21.650><c> the</c><00:25:21.799><c> private</c>

00:25:22.150 --> 00:25:22.160 align:start position:0%
private keys were exposed no the private
 

00:25:22.160 --> 00:25:25.840 align:start position:0%
private keys were exposed no the private
keys<00:25:22.400><c> are</c><00:25:22.610><c> not</c><00:25:22.760><c> exposed</c><00:25:23.240><c> and</c><00:25:23.510><c> we</c><00:25:24.110><c> are</c><00:25:24.440><c> even</c><00:25:24.850><c> the</c>

00:25:25.840 --> 00:25:25.850 align:start position:0%
keys are not exposed and we are even the
 

00:25:25.850 --> 00:25:27.640 align:start position:0%
keys are not exposed and we are even the
private<00:25:26.090><c> keys</c><00:25:26.360><c> should</c><00:25:26.720><c> not</c><00:25:26.900><c> even</c><00:25:27.140><c> leave</c><00:25:27.350><c> the</c>

00:25:27.640 --> 00:25:27.650 align:start position:0%
private keys should not even leave the
 

00:25:27.650 --> 00:25:30.850 align:start position:0%
private keys should not even leave the
device<00:25:28.299><c> so</c><00:25:29.299><c> private</c><00:25:30.020><c> key</c><00:25:30.140><c> is</c><00:25:30.260><c> something</c><00:25:30.620><c> that</c>

00:25:30.850 --> 00:25:30.860 align:start position:0%
device so private key is something that
 

00:25:30.860 --> 00:25:33.580 align:start position:0%
device so private key is something that
only<00:25:31.190><c> you</c><00:25:31.549><c> hold</c><00:25:31.970><c> and</c><00:25:32.299><c> it's</c><00:25:32.600><c> of</c><00:25:32.809><c> I</c><00:25:32.990><c> would</c><00:25:33.380><c> say</c>

00:25:33.580 --> 00:25:33.590 align:start position:0%
only you hold and it's of I would say
 

00:25:33.590 --> 00:25:35.470 align:start position:0%
only you hold and it's of I would say
that's<00:25:33.919><c> it's</c><00:25:34.669><c> very</c><00:25:34.910><c> important</c><00:25:35.270><c> in</c><00:25:35.390><c> any</c>

00:25:35.470 --> 00:25:35.480 align:start position:0%
that's it's very important in any
 

00:25:35.480 --> 00:25:37.120 align:start position:0%
that's it's very important in any
cryptographic<00:25:35.840><c> system</c><00:25:36.500><c> that</c><00:25:36.679><c> private</c><00:25:36.950><c> key</c><00:25:37.100><c> is</c>

00:25:37.120 --> 00:25:37.130 align:start position:0%
cryptographic system that private key is
 

00:25:37.130 --> 00:25:39.280 align:start position:0%
cryptographic system that private key is
keep<00:25:37.400><c> keep</c><00:25:37.700><c> sacred</c><00:25:38.059><c> the</c><00:25:38.570><c> only</c><00:25:38.750><c> thing</c><00:25:38.960><c> that</c><00:25:39.140><c> we</c>

00:25:39.280 --> 00:25:39.290 align:start position:0%
keep keep sacred the only thing that we
 

00:25:39.290 --> 00:25:41.350 align:start position:0%
keep keep sacred the only thing that we
are<00:25:39.340><c> transferring</c><00:25:40.340><c> from</c><00:25:40.549><c> one</c><00:25:40.850><c> side</c><00:25:41.179><c> to</c><00:25:41.299><c> the</c>

00:25:41.350 --> 00:25:41.360 align:start position:0%
are transferring from one side to the
 

00:25:41.360 --> 00:25:43.990 align:start position:0%
are transferring from one side to the
other<00:25:41.530><c> mainly</c><00:25:42.530><c> are</c><00:25:42.650><c> proofs</c><00:25:43.010><c> of</c><00:25:43.309><c> if</c><00:25:43.640><c> you</c><00:25:43.760><c> want</c>

00:25:43.990 --> 00:25:44.000 align:start position:0%
other mainly are proofs of if you want
 

00:25:44.000 --> 00:25:46.299 align:start position:0%
other mainly are proofs of if you want
requests<00:25:44.600><c> for</c><00:25:44.780><c> proofs</c><00:25:45.080><c> a</c><00:25:45.320><c> please</c><00:25:45.890><c> prove</c><00:25:46.250><c> me</c>

00:25:46.299 --> 00:25:46.309 align:start position:0%
requests for proofs a please prove me
 

00:25:46.309 --> 00:25:49.060 align:start position:0%
requests for proofs a please prove me
that<00:25:46.730><c> you</c><00:25:46.910><c> are</c><00:25:47.059><c> 18</c><00:25:47.419><c> years</c><00:25:47.450><c> old</c><00:25:47.929><c> here</c><00:25:48.679><c> comes</c><00:25:48.950><c> the</c>

00:25:49.060 --> 00:25:49.070 align:start position:0%
that you are 18 years old here comes the
 

00:25:49.070 --> 00:25:52.690 align:start position:0%
that you are 18 years old here comes the
proof<00:25:49.570><c> okay</c><00:25:50.570><c> so</c><00:25:51.020><c> that's</c><00:25:51.260><c> mainly</c><00:25:51.500><c> what</c><00:25:52.160><c> what</c>

00:25:52.690 --> 00:25:52.700 align:start position:0%
proof okay so that's mainly what what
 

00:25:52.700 --> 00:25:55.150 align:start position:0%
proof okay so that's mainly what what
the<00:25:53.030><c> data</c><00:25:53.240><c> that's</c><00:25:53.540><c> moving</c><00:25:53.929><c> is</c><00:25:54.260><c> about</c><00:25:54.559><c> it's</c>

00:25:55.150 --> 00:25:55.160 align:start position:0%
the data that's moving is about it's
 

00:25:55.160 --> 00:25:58.690 align:start position:0%
the data that's moving is about it's
about<00:25:55.280><c> it's</c><00:25:55.790><c> about</c><00:25:55.880><c> proofs</c><00:25:56.330><c> I</c><00:25:57.610><c> want</c><00:25:58.610><c> to</c>

00:25:58.690 --> 00:25:58.700 align:start position:0%
about it's about proofs I want to
 

00:25:58.700 --> 00:26:00.760 align:start position:0%
about it's about proofs I want to
mention<00:25:59.090><c> something</c><00:25:59.720><c> that's</c><00:26:00.020><c> important</c><00:26:00.530><c> we</c>

00:26:00.760 --> 00:26:00.770 align:start position:0%
mention something that's important we
 

00:26:00.770 --> 00:26:03.450 align:start position:0%
mention something that's important we
have<00:26:00.919><c> not</c><00:26:01.100><c> talked</c><00:26:01.280><c> about</c><00:26:01.900><c> where</c><00:26:02.900><c> all</c><00:26:03.110><c> these</c>

00:26:03.450 --> 00:26:03.460 align:start position:0%
have not talked about where all these
 

00:26:03.460 --> 00:26:06.520 align:start position:0%
have not talked about where all these
miracle<00:26:04.460><c> treats</c><00:26:04.730><c> and</c><00:26:05.150><c> all</c><00:26:05.299><c> these</c><00:26:05.540><c> data</c><00:26:06.200><c> is</c>

00:26:06.520 --> 00:26:06.530 align:start position:0%
miracle treats and all these data is
 

00:26:06.530 --> 00:26:11.350 align:start position:0%
miracle treats and all these data is
stored<00:26:06.950><c> okay</c><00:26:08.830><c> the</c><00:26:09.830><c> data</c><00:26:10.010><c> each</c><00:26:10.520><c> user</c>

00:26:11.350 --> 00:26:11.360 align:start position:0%
stored okay the data each user
 

00:26:11.360 --> 00:26:13.840 align:start position:0%
stored okay the data each user
each<00:26:12.080><c> user</c><00:26:12.410><c> should</c><00:26:12.799><c> be</c><00:26:12.830><c> responsible</c><00:26:13.370><c> for</c>

00:26:13.840 --> 00:26:13.850 align:start position:0%
each user should be responsible for
 

00:26:13.850 --> 00:26:17.049 align:start position:0%
each user should be responsible for
their<00:26:14.360><c> data</c><00:26:14.600><c> so</c><00:26:15.169><c> if</c><00:26:15.890><c> I'm</c><00:26:16.070><c> doing</c><00:26:16.100><c> claims</c><00:26:16.669><c> all</c>

00:26:17.049 --> 00:26:17.059 align:start position:0%
their data so if I'm doing claims all
 

00:26:17.059 --> 00:26:19.210 align:start position:0%
their data so if I'm doing claims all
the<00:26:17.419><c> claims</c><00:26:17.660><c> that</c><00:26:17.809><c> I'm</c><00:26:17.929><c> doing</c><00:26:18.080><c> with</c><00:26:18.679><c> all</c><00:26:18.980><c> the</c>

00:26:19.210 --> 00:26:19.220 align:start position:0%
the claims that I'm doing with all the
 

00:26:19.220 --> 00:26:22.150 align:start position:0%
the claims that I'm doing with all the
miracle<00:26:19.669><c> the</c><00:26:20.299><c> miracle</c><00:26:20.330><c> notes</c><00:26:20.990><c> all</c><00:26:21.380><c> the</c><00:26:21.650><c> notes</c>

00:26:22.150 --> 00:26:22.160 align:start position:0%
miracle the miracle notes all the notes
 

00:26:22.160 --> 00:26:26.590 align:start position:0%
miracle the miracle notes all the notes
of<00:26:22.280><c> the</c><00:26:22.400><c> miracle</c><00:26:22.700><c> tree</c><00:26:22.970><c> I</c><00:26:23.510><c> should</c><00:26:25.270><c> care</c><00:26:26.270><c> about</c>

00:26:26.590 --> 00:26:26.600 align:start position:0%
of the miracle tree I should care about
 

00:26:26.600 --> 00:26:29.710 align:start position:0%
of the miracle tree I should care about
that<00:26:27.320><c> data</c><00:26:27.590><c> I</c><00:26:27.950><c> can</c><00:26:28.220><c> store</c><00:26:28.610><c> that</c><00:26:28.790><c> data</c><00:26:28.940><c> maybe</c>

00:26:29.710 --> 00:26:29.720 align:start position:0%
that data I can store that data maybe
 

00:26:29.720 --> 00:26:31.690 align:start position:0%
that data I can store that data maybe
there<00:26:29.870><c> is</c><00:26:29.960><c> some</c><00:26:30.710><c> people</c><00:26:31.010><c> that's</c><00:26:31.220><c> comfortable</c>

00:26:31.690 --> 00:26:31.700 align:start position:0%
there is some people that's comfortable
 

00:26:31.700 --> 00:26:35.890 align:start position:0%
there is some people that's comfortable
in<00:26:31.970><c> storing</c><00:26:32.600><c> that</c><00:26:32.750><c> in</c><00:26:33.020><c> a</c><00:26:33.309><c> Google</c><00:26:34.309><c> cloud</c><00:26:34.900><c> maybe</c>

00:26:35.890 --> 00:26:35.900 align:start position:0%
in storing that in a Google cloud maybe
 

00:26:35.900 --> 00:26:37.299 align:start position:0%
in storing that in a Google cloud maybe
there<00:26:36.200><c> are</c><00:26:36.320><c> some</c><00:26:36.559><c> governments</c><00:26:37.070><c> that</c><00:26:37.160><c> they</c>

00:26:37.299 --> 00:26:37.309 align:start position:0%
there are some governments that they
 

00:26:37.309 --> 00:26:39.490 align:start position:0%
there are some governments that they
have<00:26:37.549><c> their</c><00:26:37.760><c> own</c><00:26:37.790><c> premises</c><00:26:38.210><c> maybe</c><00:26:39.200><c> there</c><00:26:39.410><c> are</c>

00:26:39.490 --> 00:26:39.500 align:start position:0%
have their own premises maybe there are
 

00:26:39.500 --> 00:26:41.740 align:start position:0%
have their own premises maybe there are
solutions<00:26:39.830><c> that</c><00:26:40.130><c> people</c><00:26:40.700><c> that</c><00:26:41.000><c> want</c><00:26:41.240><c> to</c><00:26:41.419><c> store</c>

00:26:41.740 --> 00:26:41.750 align:start position:0%
solutions that people that want to store
 

00:26:41.750 --> 00:26:46.000 align:start position:0%
solutions that people that want to store
those<00:26:42.049><c> data</c><00:26:42.650><c> in</c><00:26:42.830><c> an</c><00:26:43.220><c> IP</c><00:26:43.700><c> FS</c><00:26:44.530><c> in</c><00:26:45.530><c> an</c><00:26:45.679><c> encrypted</c>

00:26:46.000 --> 00:26:46.010 align:start position:0%
those data in an IP FS in an encrypted
 

00:26:46.010 --> 00:26:48.700 align:start position:0%
those data in an IP FS in an encrypted
way<00:26:46.400><c> ipfs</c><00:26:47.150><c> and</c><00:26:47.419><c> maybe</c><00:26:47.600><c> using</c><00:26:47.870><c> no</c><00:26:48.290><c> say</c><00:26:48.500><c> no</c>

00:26:48.700 --> 00:26:48.710 align:start position:0%
way ipfs and maybe using no say no
 

00:26:48.710 --> 00:26:51.210 align:start position:0%
way ipfs and maybe using no say no
cipher<00:26:49.159><c> just</c><00:26:49.549><c> to</c><00:26:49.760><c> access</c>

00:26:51.210 --> 00:26:51.220 align:start position:0%
cipher just to access
 

00:26:51.220 --> 00:26:53.970 align:start position:0%
cipher just to access
so<00:26:51.490><c> there</c><00:26:51.670><c> are</c><00:26:51.730><c> many</c><00:26:51.970><c> options</c><00:26:52.240><c> about</c><00:26:53.200><c> where</c>

00:26:53.970 --> 00:26:53.980 align:start position:0%
so there are many options about where
 

00:26:53.980 --> 00:26:59.220 align:start position:0%
so there are many options about where
the<00:26:54.280><c> user</c><00:26:54.490><c> keeps</c><00:26:55.150><c> that</c><00:26:55.630><c> data</c><00:26:55.900><c> but</c><00:26:56.970><c> in</c><00:26:57.970><c> a</c><00:26:58.230><c> cell</c>

00:26:59.220 --> 00:26:59.230 align:start position:0%
the user keeps that data but in a cell
 

00:26:59.230 --> 00:27:02.010 align:start position:0%
the user keeps that data but in a cell
sovereign<00:26:59.680><c> system</c><00:27:00.160><c> ajusshi</c><00:27:00.820><c> user</c><00:27:01.480><c> have</c><00:27:01.840><c> to</c>

00:27:02.010 --> 00:27:02.020 align:start position:0%
sovereign system ajusshi user have to
 

00:27:02.020 --> 00:27:04.830 align:start position:0%
sovereign system ajusshi user have to
take<00:27:02.230><c> care</c><00:27:02.530><c> of</c><00:27:02.830><c> his</c><00:27:03.460><c> data</c><00:27:03.640><c> of</c><00:27:04.270><c> course</c><00:27:04.450><c> we</c><00:27:04.630><c> can</c>

00:27:04.830 --> 00:27:04.840 align:start position:0%
take care of his data of course we can
 

00:27:04.840 --> 00:27:07.890 align:start position:0%
take care of his data of course we can
provide<00:27:05.530><c> tools</c><00:27:05.800><c> for</c><00:27:06.150><c> in</c><00:27:07.150><c> order</c><00:27:07.300><c> to</c><00:27:07.570><c> have</c><00:27:07.750><c> the</c>

00:27:07.890 --> 00:27:07.900 align:start position:0%
provide tools for in order to have the
 

00:27:07.900 --> 00:27:10.800 align:start position:0%
provide tools for in order to have the
users<00:27:08.230><c> but</c><00:27:08.940><c> it's</c><00:27:09.940><c> important</c><00:27:10.540><c> that</c><00:27:10.630><c> we</c>

00:27:10.800 --> 00:27:10.810 align:start position:0%
users but it's important that we
 

00:27:10.810 --> 00:27:14.940 align:start position:0%
users but it's important that we
understand<00:27:11.500><c> that</c><00:27:13.170><c> when</c><00:27:14.170><c> they</c><00:27:14.320><c> when</c><00:27:14.650><c> you</c><00:27:14.770><c> have</c>

00:27:14.940 --> 00:27:14.950 align:start position:0%
understand that when they when you have
 

00:27:14.950 --> 00:27:18.330 align:start position:0%
understand that when they when you have
a<00:27:14.980><c> censoring</c><00:27:15.780><c> identity</c><00:27:16.780><c> you</c><00:27:17.530><c> own</c><00:27:17.830><c> your</c>

00:27:18.330 --> 00:27:18.340 align:start position:0%
a censoring identity you own your
 

00:27:18.340 --> 00:27:20.160 align:start position:0%
a censoring identity you own your
identity<00:27:18.850><c> and</c><00:27:19.060><c> that</c><00:27:19.090><c> means</c><00:27:19.480><c> you</c><00:27:19.690><c> own</c><00:27:19.870><c> your</c>

00:27:20.160 --> 00:27:20.170 align:start position:0%
identity and that means you own your
 

00:27:20.170 --> 00:27:26.430 align:start position:0%
identity and that means you own your
data<00:27:22.890><c> question</c><00:27:23.890><c> so</c><00:27:24.820><c> as</c><00:27:25.090><c> a</c><00:27:25.900><c> developer</c>

00:27:26.430 --> 00:27:26.440 align:start position:0%
data question so as a developer
 

00:27:26.440 --> 00:27:28.530 align:start position:0%
data question so as a developer
obviously<00:27:27.400><c> I'm</c><00:27:27.490><c> very</c><00:27:27.700><c> interested</c><00:27:28.120><c> in</c><00:27:28.360><c> what</c>

00:27:28.530 --> 00:27:28.540 align:start position:0%
obviously I'm very interested in what
 

00:27:28.540 --> 00:27:29.910 align:start position:0%
obviously I'm very interested in what
you're<00:27:28.690><c> doing</c><00:27:29.020><c> I'm</c><00:27:29.170><c> gonna</c><00:27:29.320><c> take</c><00:27:29.530><c> a</c><00:27:29.560><c> look</c><00:27:29.830><c> at</c>

00:27:29.910 --> 00:27:29.920 align:start position:0%
you're doing I'm gonna take a look at
 

00:27:29.920 --> 00:27:32.970 align:start position:0%
you're doing I'm gonna take a look at
your<00:27:30.160><c> library</c><00:27:31.030><c> I'm</c><00:27:31.720><c> over</c><00:27:31.960><c> here</c><00:27:32.080><c> okay</c><00:27:32.620><c> I'm</c>

00:27:32.970 --> 00:27:32.980 align:start position:0%
your library I'm over here okay I'm
 

00:27:32.980 --> 00:27:34.890 align:start position:0%
your library I'm over here okay I'm
gonna<00:27:33.130><c> take</c><00:27:33.340><c> a</c><00:27:33.400><c> look</c><00:27:33.640><c> at</c><00:27:33.760><c> your</c><00:27:34.000><c> github</c>

00:27:34.890 --> 00:27:34.900 align:start position:0%
gonna take a look at your github
 

00:27:34.900 --> 00:27:36.830 align:start position:0%
gonna take a look at your github
libraries<00:27:35.470><c> as</c><00:27:35.740><c> well</c><00:27:35.770><c> as</c><00:27:35.950><c> your</c><00:27:36.190><c> documentation</c>

00:27:36.830 --> 00:27:36.840 align:start position:0%
libraries as well as your documentation
 

00:27:36.840 --> 00:27:39.900 align:start position:0%
libraries as well as your documentation
one<00:27:37.840><c> thing</c><00:27:38.050><c> just</c><00:27:38.350><c> to</c><00:27:38.560><c> help</c><00:27:38.890><c> me</c><00:27:39.130><c> when</c><00:27:39.550><c> I</c><00:27:39.580><c> start</c>

00:27:39.900 --> 00:27:39.910 align:start position:0%
one thing just to help me when I start
 

00:27:39.910 --> 00:27:42.390 align:start position:0%
one thing just to help me when I start
that<00:27:40.090><c> journey</c><00:27:40.300><c> is</c><00:27:40.570><c> you</c><00:27:41.470><c> know</c><00:27:41.590><c> compared</c><00:27:42.190><c> to</c>

00:27:42.390 --> 00:27:42.400 align:start position:0%
that journey is you know compared to
 

00:27:42.400 --> 00:27:46.230 align:start position:0%
that journey is you know compared to
what<00:27:43.000><c> is</c><00:27:43.870><c> being</c><00:27:44.170><c> developed</c><00:27:44.410><c> by</c><00:27:44.700><c> you</c><00:27:45.700><c> port</c><00:27:45.970><c> in</c>

00:27:46.230 --> 00:27:46.240 align:start position:0%
what is being developed by you port in
 

00:27:46.240 --> 00:27:49.650 align:start position:0%
what is being developed by you port in
the<00:27:46.630><c> etherium</c><00:27:46.990><c> space</c><00:27:47.290><c> or</c><00:27:47.970><c> you</c><00:27:48.970><c> know</c><00:27:49.090><c> sovereign</c>

00:27:49.650 --> 00:27:49.660 align:start position:0%
the etherium space or you know sovereign
 

00:27:49.660 --> 00:27:53.430 align:start position:0%
the etherium space or you know sovereign
or<00:27:49.900><c> hyper</c><00:27:50.230><c> ledger</c><00:27:50.500><c> indie</c><00:27:51.600><c> on</c><00:27:52.600><c> their</c><00:27:52.960><c> own</c><00:27:53.110><c> chain</c>

00:27:53.430 --> 00:27:53.440 align:start position:0%
or hyper ledger indie on their own chain
 

00:27:53.440 --> 00:27:55.980 align:start position:0%
or hyper ledger indie on their own chain
how<00:27:53.770><c> would</c><00:27:54.040><c> I</c><00:27:54.070><c> think</c><00:27:54.400><c> about</c><00:27:54.670><c> this</c><00:27:55.360><c> effort</c><00:27:55.780><c> in</c>

00:27:55.980 --> 00:27:55.990 align:start position:0%
how would I think about this effort in
 

00:27:55.990 --> 00:27:58.310 align:start position:0%
how would I think about this effort in
this<00:27:56.170><c> technology</c><00:27:56.860><c> in</c><00:27:57.040><c> comparison</c><00:27:57.730><c> to</c><00:27:57.820><c> those</c>

00:27:58.310 --> 00:27:58.320 align:start position:0%
this technology in comparison to those
 

00:27:58.320 --> 00:28:01.110 align:start position:0%
this technology in comparison to those
yeah<00:27:59.320><c> well</c><00:27:59.530><c> we</c><00:27:59.710><c> are</c><00:27:59.740><c> different</c><00:28:00.640><c> different</c>

00:28:01.110 --> 00:28:01.120 align:start position:0%
yeah well we are different different
 

00:28:01.120 --> 00:28:03.270 align:start position:0%
yeah well we are different different
projects<00:28:01.960><c> that</c><00:28:02.170><c> maybe</c><00:28:02.380><c> we</c><00:28:02.560><c> have</c><00:28:02.800><c> different</c>

00:28:03.270 --> 00:28:03.280 align:start position:0%
projects that maybe we have different
 

00:28:03.280 --> 00:28:05.160 align:start position:0%
projects that maybe we have different
views<00:28:03.370><c> we</c><00:28:03.760><c> are</c><00:28:03.880><c> all</c><00:28:04.120><c> of</c><00:28:04.330><c> us</c><00:28:04.450><c> working</c><00:28:04.900><c> together</c>

00:28:05.160 --> 00:28:05.170 align:start position:0%
views we are all of us working together
 

00:28:05.170 --> 00:28:08.880 align:start position:0%
views we are all of us working together
we<00:28:05.740><c> are</c><00:28:06.150><c> connected</c><00:28:07.150><c> on</c><00:28:07.450><c> each</c><00:28:07.600><c> other</c><00:28:07.840><c> and</c><00:28:08.080><c> we</c>

00:28:08.880 --> 00:28:08.890 align:start position:0%
we are connected on each other and we
 

00:28:08.890 --> 00:28:11.670 align:start position:0%
we are connected on each other and we
are<00:28:09.340><c> just</c><00:28:09.910><c> working</c><00:28:10.270><c> I</c><00:28:10.720><c> would</c><00:28:11.170><c> say</c><00:28:11.350><c> more</c><00:28:11.560><c> or</c>

00:28:11.670 --> 00:28:11.680 align:start position:0%
are just working I would say more or
 

00:28:11.680 --> 00:28:14.070 align:start position:0%
are just working I would say more or
less<00:28:11.860><c> in</c><00:28:12.070><c> the</c><00:28:12.190><c> same</c><00:28:12.220><c> direction</c><00:28:12.640><c> but</c><00:28:13.480><c> if</c><00:28:13.720><c> even</c>

00:28:14.070 --> 00:28:14.080 align:start position:0%
less in the same direction but if even
 

00:28:14.080 --> 00:28:15.630 align:start position:0%
less in the same direction but if even
if<00:28:14.200><c> there</c><00:28:14.470><c> are</c><00:28:14.560><c> different</c><00:28:14.950><c> projects</c><00:28:15.340><c> that</c><00:28:15.430><c> are</c>

00:28:15.630 --> 00:28:15.640 align:start position:0%
if there are different projects that are
 

00:28:15.640 --> 00:28:17.730 align:start position:0%
if there are different projects that are
trying<00:28:15.940><c> to</c><00:28:16.180><c> do</c><00:28:16.330><c> a</c><00:28:16.360><c> little</c><00:28:16.600><c> bit</c><00:28:16.840><c> the</c><00:28:16.930><c> same</c><00:28:17.110><c> at</c>

00:28:17.730 --> 00:28:17.740 align:start position:0%
trying to do a little bit the same at
 

00:28:17.740 --> 00:28:19.800 align:start position:0%
trying to do a little bit the same at
the<00:28:17.980><c> end</c><00:28:18.100><c> end</c><00:28:18.310><c> users</c><00:28:18.760><c> the</c><00:28:19.030><c> developers</c><00:28:19.510><c> the</c>

00:28:19.800 --> 00:28:19.810 align:start position:0%
the end end users the developers the
 

00:28:19.810 --> 00:28:22.710 align:start position:0%
the end end users the developers the
people<00:28:20.110><c> will</c><00:28:20.290><c> just</c><00:28:20.700><c> you</c><00:28:21.700><c> know</c><00:28:21.730><c> be</c><00:28:22.000><c> the</c><00:28:22.180><c> the</c><00:28:22.540><c> are</c>

00:28:22.710 --> 00:28:22.720 align:start position:0%
people will just you know be the the are
 

00:28:22.720 --> 00:28:24.720 align:start position:0%
people will just you know be the the are
they<00:28:23.230><c> were</c><00:28:23.440><c> they</c><00:28:23.740><c> will</c><00:28:23.920><c> say</c><00:28:24.100><c> which</c><00:28:24.310><c> is</c><00:28:24.490><c> one</c><00:28:24.700><c> the</c>

00:28:24.720 --> 00:28:24.730 align:start position:0%
they were they will say which is one the
 

00:28:24.730 --> 00:28:27.810 align:start position:0%
they were they will say which is one the
the<00:28:25.510><c> one</c><00:28:25.690><c> more</c><00:28:25.900><c> the</c><00:28:26.800><c> one</c><00:28:26.950><c> was</c><00:28:27.130><c> useful</c><00:28:27.580><c> to</c><00:28:27.700><c> them</c>

00:28:27.810 --> 00:28:27.820 align:start position:0%
the one more the one was useful to them
 

00:28:27.820 --> 00:28:29.880 align:start position:0%
the one more the one was useful to them
so<00:28:28.060><c> it's</c><00:28:28.210><c> a</c><00:28:28.480><c> what</c><00:28:28.900><c> do</c><00:28:28.990><c> you</c><00:28:29.050><c> mean</c><00:28:29.230><c> by</c><00:28:29.410><c> connected</c>

00:28:29.880 --> 00:28:29.890 align:start position:0%
so it's a what do you mean by connected
 

00:28:29.890 --> 00:28:32.220 align:start position:0%
so it's a what do you mean by connected
though<00:28:30.040><c> is</c><00:28:30.400><c> there</c><00:28:30.640><c> an</c><00:28:30.760><c> interrupt</c><00:28:31.230><c> just</c>

00:28:32.220 --> 00:28:32.230 align:start position:0%
though is there an interrupt just
 

00:28:32.230 --> 00:28:34.740 align:start position:0%
though is there an interrupt just
looking<00:28:32.590><c> to</c><00:28:32.710><c> do</c><00:28:33.090><c> just</c><00:28:34.090><c> connected</c><00:28:34.510><c> mean</c><00:28:34.630><c> that</c>

00:28:34.740 --> 00:28:34.750 align:start position:0%
looking to do just connected mean that
 

00:28:34.750 --> 00:28:37.200 align:start position:0%
looking to do just connected mean that
I'm<00:28:34.840><c> connected</c><00:28:35.260><c> with</c><00:28:35.550><c> most</c><00:28:36.550><c> of</c><00:28:36.700><c> the</c><00:28:36.850><c> people</c>

00:28:37.200 --> 00:28:37.210 align:start position:0%
I'm connected with most of the people
 

00:28:37.210 --> 00:28:39.680 align:start position:0%
I'm connected with most of the people
that's<00:28:37.660><c> developing</c><00:28:38.260><c> and</c><00:28:38.470><c> we</c><00:28:38.770><c> are</c><00:28:38.890><c> trying</c><00:28:39.160><c> to</c>

00:28:39.680 --> 00:28:39.690 align:start position:0%
that's developing and we are trying to
 

00:28:39.690 --> 00:28:42.150 align:start position:0%
that's developing and we are trying to
you<00:28:40.690><c> know</c><00:28:40.750><c> for</c><00:28:40.990><c> example</c><00:28:41.050><c> the</c><00:28:41.380><c> three</c><00:28:41.590><c> magicians</c>

00:28:42.150 --> 00:28:42.160 align:start position:0%
you know for example the three magicians
 

00:28:42.160 --> 00:28:45.540 align:start position:0%
you know for example the three magicians
and<00:28:42.460><c> in</c><00:28:42.670><c> different</c><00:28:43.480><c> environments</c><00:28:44.400><c> there</c><00:28:45.400><c> is</c>

00:28:45.540 --> 00:28:45.550 align:start position:0%
and in different environments there is
 

00:28:45.550 --> 00:28:48.210 align:start position:0%
and in different environments there is
to<00:28:45.790><c> try</c><00:28:46.450><c> to</c><00:28:46.540><c> generate</c><00:28:47.200><c> those</c><00:28:47.470><c> standards</c><00:28:48.070><c> and</c>

00:28:48.210 --> 00:28:48.220 align:start position:0%
to try to generate those standards and
 

00:28:48.220 --> 00:28:51.300 align:start position:0%
to try to generate those standards and
those<00:28:48.430><c> standards</c><00:28:48.490><c> that</c><00:28:48.970><c> we</c><00:28:49.330><c> are</c><00:28:49.980><c> aligned</c><00:28:50.980><c> on</c>

00:28:51.300 --> 00:28:51.310 align:start position:0%
those standards that we are aligned on
 

00:28:51.310 --> 00:28:54.300 align:start position:0%
those standards that we are aligned on
that<00:28:51.640><c> and</c><00:28:51.850><c> trying</c><00:28:52.480><c> to</c><00:28:52.600><c> get</c><00:28:52.870><c> consensus</c><00:28:53.530><c> in</c><00:28:53.770><c> what</c>

00:28:54.300 --> 00:28:54.310 align:start position:0%
that and trying to get consensus in what
 

00:28:54.310 --> 00:28:57.660 align:start position:0%
that and trying to get consensus in what
are<00:28:54.430><c> those</c><00:28:54.610><c> protocols</c><00:28:55.680><c> that</c><00:28:56.680><c> appear</c><00:28:57.430><c> the</c><00:28:57.520><c> main</c>

00:28:57.660 --> 00:28:57.670 align:start position:0%
are those protocols that appear the main
 

00:28:57.670 --> 00:29:00.750 align:start position:0%
are those protocols that appear the main
problem<00:28:58.090><c> here</c><00:28:58.120><c> is</c><00:28:58.510><c> that</c><00:28:59.340><c> now</c><00:29:00.340><c> the</c><00:29:00.400><c> technology</c>

00:29:00.750 --> 00:29:00.760 align:start position:0%
problem here is that now the technology
 

00:29:00.760 --> 00:29:03.840 align:start position:0%
problem here is that now the technology
is<00:29:01.060><c> not</c><00:29:01.270><c> clear</c><00:29:01.570><c> yet</c><00:29:01.840><c> so</c><00:29:02.170><c> I</c><00:29:02.410><c> would</c><00:29:03.040><c> say</c><00:29:03.190><c> first</c><00:29:03.550><c> we</c>

00:29:03.840 --> 00:29:03.850 align:start position:0%
is not clear yet so I would say first we
 

00:29:03.850 --> 00:29:04.380 align:start position:0%
is not clear yet so I would say first we
need<00:29:04.000><c> to</c>

00:29:04.380 --> 00:29:04.390 align:start position:0%
need to
 

00:29:04.390 --> 00:29:06.539 align:start position:0%
need to
the<00:29:04.480><c> develop</c><00:29:05.020><c> the</c><00:29:05.170><c> technology</c><00:29:05.650><c> develop</c><00:29:06.370><c> some</c>

00:29:06.539 --> 00:29:06.549 align:start position:0%
the develop the technology develop some
 

00:29:06.549 --> 00:29:08.789 align:start position:0%
the develop the technology develop some
applications<00:29:07.150><c> see</c><00:29:07.570><c> how</c><00:29:07.780><c> the</c><00:29:07.840><c> people</c><00:29:08.290><c> how</c><00:29:08.440><c> the</c>

00:29:08.789 --> 00:29:08.799 align:start position:0%
applications see how the people how the
 

00:29:08.799 --> 00:29:10.680 align:start position:0%
applications see how the people how the
people<00:29:09.190><c> is</c><00:29:09.309><c> using</c><00:29:09.670><c> that</c><00:29:09.790><c> how</c><00:29:10.179><c> the</c><00:29:10.240><c> system</c>

00:29:10.680 --> 00:29:10.690 align:start position:0%
people is using that how the system
 

00:29:10.690 --> 00:29:14.310 align:start position:0%
people is using that how the system
works<00:29:10.960><c> and</c><00:29:11.460><c> once</c><00:29:12.460><c> the</c><00:29:13.330><c> reason</c><00:29:13.480><c> adoption</c><00:29:14.170><c> of</c>

00:29:14.310 --> 00:29:14.320 align:start position:0%
works and once the reason adoption of
 

00:29:14.320 --> 00:29:17.760 align:start position:0%
works and once the reason adoption of
those<00:29:14.799><c> technologies</c><00:29:15.400><c> we</c><00:29:15.910><c> can</c><00:29:16.559><c> start</c><00:29:17.559><c> thinking</c>

00:29:17.760 --> 00:29:17.770 align:start position:0%
those technologies we can start thinking
 

00:29:17.770 --> 00:29:21.690 align:start position:0%
those technologies we can start thinking
very<00:29:18.610><c> much</c><00:29:18.820><c> in</c><00:29:19.030><c> what</c><00:29:19.059><c> what</c><00:29:19.750><c> what</c><00:29:20.740><c> what</c><00:29:21.460><c> are</c><00:29:21.580><c> the</c>

00:29:21.690 --> 00:29:21.700 align:start position:0%
very much in what what what what are the
 

00:29:21.700 --> 00:29:23.730 align:start position:0%
very much in what what what what are the
best<00:29:21.850><c> standards</c><00:29:22.360><c> if</c><00:29:22.690><c> we</c><00:29:23.170><c> define</c><00:29:23.530><c> the</c>

00:29:23.730 --> 00:29:23.740 align:start position:0%
best standards if we define the
 

00:29:23.740 --> 00:29:25.890 align:start position:0%
best standards if we define the
standards<00:29:24.660><c> prematurely</c>

00:29:25.890 --> 00:29:25.900 align:start position:0%
standards prematurely
 

00:29:25.900 --> 00:29:29.340 align:start position:0%
standards prematurely
we<00:29:26.380><c> have</c><00:29:26.880><c> women</c><00:29:27.880><c> it's</c><00:29:28.179><c> possible</c><00:29:28.840><c> that</c><00:29:28.990><c> maybe</c>

00:29:29.340 --> 00:29:29.350 align:start position:0%
we have women it's possible that maybe
 

00:29:29.350 --> 00:29:31.890 align:start position:0%
we have women it's possible that maybe
the<00:29:29.559><c> standards</c><00:29:30.040><c> would</c><00:29:30.460><c> not</c><00:29:30.520><c> be</c><00:29:30.940><c> working</c><00:29:31.420><c> and</c>

00:29:31.890 --> 00:29:31.900 align:start position:0%
the standards would not be working and
 

00:29:31.900 --> 00:29:34.350 align:start position:0%
the standards would not be working and
maybe<00:29:32.200><c> we</c><00:29:32.350><c> will</c><00:29:32.410><c> have</c><00:29:32.559><c> having</c><00:29:33.549><c> another</c><00:29:34.059><c> de</c>

00:29:34.350 --> 00:29:34.360 align:start position:0%
maybe we will have having another de
 

00:29:34.360 --> 00:29:35.310 align:start position:0%
maybe we will have having another de
facto<00:29:34.720><c> standards</c>

00:29:35.310 --> 00:29:35.320 align:start position:0%
facto standards
 

00:29:35.320 --> 00:29:37.799 align:start position:0%
facto standards
so<00:29:35.650><c> here</c><00:29:36.070><c> the</c><00:29:36.220><c> tempos</c><00:29:36.610><c> are</c><00:29:36.790><c> very</c><00:29:37.150><c> important</c><00:29:37.630><c> I</c>

00:29:37.799 --> 00:29:37.809 align:start position:0%
so here the tempos are very important I
 

00:29:37.809 --> 00:29:39.600 align:start position:0%
so here the tempos are very important I
think<00:29:38.110><c> it's</c><00:29:38.410><c> important</c><00:29:38.890><c> that</c><00:29:38.919><c> there</c><00:29:39.250><c> are</c><00:29:39.340><c> many</c>

00:29:39.600 --> 00:29:39.610 align:start position:0%
think it's important that there are many
 

00:29:39.610 --> 00:29:42.270 align:start position:0%
think it's important that there are many
many<00:29:40.030><c> teams</c><00:29:40.330><c> that</c><00:29:40.540><c> are</c><00:29:40.660><c> working</c><00:29:40.690><c> in</c><00:29:41.200><c> in</c><00:29:41.559><c> in</c>

00:29:42.270 --> 00:29:42.280 align:start position:0%
many teams that are working in in in
 

00:29:42.280 --> 00:29:44.280 align:start position:0%
many teams that are working in in in
solutions<00:29:42.910><c> like</c><00:29:43.179><c> that</c><00:29:43.210><c> or</c><00:29:43.570><c> sort</c><00:29:43.750><c> of</c><00:29:43.840><c> solutions</c>

00:29:44.280 --> 00:29:44.290 align:start position:0%
solutions like that or sort of solutions
 

00:29:44.290 --> 00:29:49.610 align:start position:0%
solutions like that or sort of solutions
similar<00:29:44.710><c> to</c><00:29:44.950><c> that</c><00:29:45.240><c> and</c><00:29:47.669><c> keep</c><00:29:48.669><c> working</c><00:29:48.880><c> and</c>

00:29:49.610 --> 00:29:49.620 align:start position:0%
similar to that and keep working and
 

00:29:49.620 --> 00:29:52.650 align:start position:0%
similar to that and keep working and
being<00:29:50.620><c> aware</c><00:29:50.950><c> of</c><00:29:51.190><c> what</c><00:29:51.820><c> all</c><00:29:52.030><c> the</c><00:29:52.179><c> other</c><00:29:52.360><c> teams</c>

00:29:52.650 --> 00:29:52.660 align:start position:0%
being aware of what all the other teams
 

00:29:52.660 --> 00:29:55.919 align:start position:0%
being aware of what all the other teams
are<00:29:52.929><c> doing</c><00:29:53.290><c> just</c><00:29:54.100><c> being</c><00:29:54.309><c> transparent</c><00:29:54.940><c> and</c><00:29:55.390><c> you</c>

00:29:55.919 --> 00:29:55.929 align:start position:0%
are doing just being transparent and you
 

00:29:55.929 --> 00:29:57.600 align:start position:0%
are doing just being transparent and you
know<00:29:56.020><c> the</c><00:29:56.559><c> nice</c><00:29:56.679><c> thing</c><00:29:56.710><c> of</c><00:29:56.980><c> open-source</c><00:29:57.250><c> is</c>

00:29:57.600 --> 00:29:57.610 align:start position:0%
know the nice thing of open-source is
 

00:29:57.610 --> 00:30:00.120 align:start position:0%
know the nice thing of open-source is
that<00:29:57.760><c> we</c><00:29:58.299><c> don't</c><00:29:58.480><c> have</c><00:29:58.600><c> to</c><00:29:58.750><c> hide</c><00:29:58.960><c> anything</c><00:29:59.290><c> just</c>

00:30:00.120 --> 00:30:00.130 align:start position:0%
that we don't have to hide anything just
 

00:30:00.130 --> 00:30:02.130 align:start position:0%
that we don't have to hide anything just
just<00:30:00.700><c> talk</c><00:30:00.940><c> and</c><00:30:01.179><c> if</c><00:30:01.390><c> they</c><00:30:01.570><c> are</c><00:30:01.630><c> battery</c>

00:30:02.130 --> 00:30:02.140 align:start position:0%
just talk and if they are battery
 

00:30:02.140 --> 00:30:06.000 align:start position:0%
just talk and if they are battery
there's<00:30:03.240><c> as</c><00:30:04.240><c> an</c><00:30:04.390><c> example</c><00:30:04.660><c> alex</c><00:30:05.620><c> van</c><00:30:05.740><c> der</c><00:30:05.860><c> Sar</c>

00:30:06.000 --> 00:30:06.010 align:start position:0%
there's as an example alex van der Sar
 

00:30:06.010 --> 00:30:08.100 align:start position:0%
there's as an example alex van der Sar
is<00:30:06.190><c> doing</c><00:30:06.400><c> an</c><00:30:06.520><c> incredible</c><00:30:06.790><c> job</c><00:30:07.090><c> in</c><00:30:07.510><c> the</c><00:30:07.929><c> login</c>

00:30:08.100 --> 00:30:08.110 align:start position:0%
is doing an incredible job in the login
 

00:30:08.110 --> 00:30:11.299 align:start position:0%
is doing an incredible job in the login
we<00:30:08.440><c> are</c><00:30:08.500><c> just</c><00:30:09.600><c> going</c><00:30:10.600><c> in</c><00:30:10.780><c> that</c><00:30:10.900><c> direction</c>

00:30:11.299 --> 00:30:11.309 align:start position:0%
we are just going in that direction
 

00:30:11.309 --> 00:30:14.280 align:start position:0%
we are just going in that direction
maybe<00:30:12.309><c> there</c><00:30:12.549><c> is</c><00:30:12.640><c> some</c><00:30:13.450><c> security</c><00:30:14.020><c> issue</c><00:30:14.140><c> that</c>

00:30:14.280 --> 00:30:14.290 align:start position:0%
maybe there is some security issue that
 

00:30:14.290 --> 00:30:16.980 align:start position:0%
maybe there is some security issue that
we<00:30:14.650><c> are</c><00:30:14.770><c> not</c><00:30:15.240><c> what</c><00:30:16.240><c> we</c><00:30:16.390><c> don't</c><00:30:16.510><c> see</c><00:30:16.720><c> it</c><00:30:16.780><c> clear</c>

00:30:16.980 --> 00:30:16.990 align:start position:0%
we are not what we don't see it clear
 

00:30:16.990 --> 00:30:18.450 align:start position:0%
we are not what we don't see it clear
okay<00:30:17.320><c> we</c><00:30:17.440><c> will</c><00:30:17.559><c> tell</c><00:30:17.710><c> them</c><00:30:17.860><c> we're</c><00:30:18.040><c> attack</c><00:30:18.280><c> him</c>

00:30:18.450 --> 00:30:18.460 align:start position:0%
okay we will tell them we're attack him
 

00:30:18.460 --> 00:30:20.400 align:start position:0%
okay we will tell them we're attack him
hey<00:30:18.820><c> what</c><00:30:19.210><c> happened</c><00:30:19.540><c> with</c><00:30:19.660><c> this</c><00:30:19.809><c> and</c><00:30:20.049><c> there</c><00:30:20.320><c> is</c>

00:30:20.400 --> 00:30:20.410 align:start position:0%
hey what happened with this and there is
 

00:30:20.410 --> 00:30:22.560 align:start position:0%
hey what happened with this and there is
will<00:30:20.559><c> be</c><00:30:20.650><c> a</c><00:30:20.679><c> talk</c><00:30:20.919><c> and</c><00:30:21.160><c> there</c><00:30:21.280><c> is</c><00:30:21.370><c> a</c><00:30:21.400><c> feedback</c><00:30:22.390><c> I</c>

00:30:22.560 --> 00:30:22.570 align:start position:0%
will be a talk and there is a feedback I
 

00:30:22.570 --> 00:30:24.210 align:start position:0%
will be a talk and there is a feedback I
really<00:30:22.900><c> mean</c><00:30:22.990><c> our</c><00:30:23.140><c> limitation</c><00:30:23.830><c> between</c><00:30:24.130><c> the</c>

00:30:24.210 --> 00:30:24.220 align:start position:0%
really mean our limitation between the
 

00:30:24.220 --> 00:30:28.020 align:start position:0%
really mean our limitation between the
teams<00:30:24.429><c> and</c><00:30:24.820><c> if</c><00:30:25.090><c> we</c><00:30:25.210><c> work</c><00:30:25.390><c> that</c><00:30:25.570><c> way</c><00:30:26.100><c> mmm</c><00:30:27.100><c> I'm</c>

00:30:28.020 --> 00:30:28.030 align:start position:0%
teams and if we work that way mmm I'm
 

00:30:28.030 --> 00:30:32.520 align:start position:0%
teams and if we work that way mmm I'm
sure<00:30:28.390><c> that</c><00:30:29.070><c> we</c><00:30:30.070><c> can</c><00:30:30.250><c> get</c><00:30:30.429><c> a</c><00:30:30.669><c> good</c><00:30:31.200><c> we</c><00:30:32.200><c> can</c><00:30:32.350><c> get</c><00:30:32.470><c> a</c>

00:30:32.520 --> 00:30:32.530 align:start position:0%
sure that we can get a good we can get a
 

00:30:32.530 --> 00:30:34.140 align:start position:0%
sure that we can get a good we can get a
good<00:30:32.740><c> consensus</c><00:30:33.250><c> of</c><00:30:33.340><c> that</c><00:30:33.549><c> and</c><00:30:33.760><c> if</c><00:30:33.970><c> we</c><00:30:34.059><c> don't</c>

00:30:34.140 --> 00:30:34.150 align:start position:0%
good consensus of that and if we don't
 

00:30:34.150 --> 00:30:35.400 align:start position:0%
good consensus of that and if we don't
get<00:30:34.270><c> the</c><00:30:34.390><c> consensus</c><00:30:34.809><c> maybe</c><00:30:34.990><c> it's</c><00:30:35.140><c> because</c>

00:30:35.400 --> 00:30:35.410 align:start position:0%
get the consensus maybe it's because
 

00:30:35.410 --> 00:30:37.770 align:start position:0%
get the consensus maybe it's because
there<00:30:35.590><c> is</c><00:30:35.679><c> two</c><00:30:36.010><c> approaches</c><00:30:36.520><c> that</c><00:30:37.210><c> make</c><00:30:37.480><c> sense</c>

00:30:37.770 --> 00:30:37.780 align:start position:0%
there is two approaches that make sense
 

00:30:37.780 --> 00:30:42.600 align:start position:0%
there is two approaches that make sense
and<00:30:38.049><c> at</c><00:30:39.040><c> the</c><00:30:39.190><c> end</c><00:30:40.410><c> the</c><00:30:41.410><c> people</c><00:30:41.559><c> the</c><00:30:42.040><c> market</c><00:30:42.429><c> the</c>

00:30:42.600 --> 00:30:42.610 align:start position:0%
and at the end the people the market the
 

00:30:42.610 --> 00:30:46.470 align:start position:0%
and at the end the people the market the
community<00:30:43.290><c> will</c><00:30:44.290><c> decide</c><00:30:44.679><c> which</c><00:30:45.580><c> one</c><00:30:45.850><c> is</c><00:30:46.210><c> the</c>

00:30:46.470 --> 00:30:46.480 align:start position:0%
community will decide which one is the
 

00:30:46.480 --> 00:30:49.700 align:start position:0%
community will decide which one is the
best<00:30:46.630><c> one</c><00:30:47.700><c> last</c><00:30:48.700><c> question</c>

00:30:49.700 --> 00:30:49.710 align:start position:0%
best one last question
 

00:30:49.710 --> 00:30:51.930 align:start position:0%
best one last question
all<00:30:50.710><c> right</c><00:30:50.860><c> Jordi</c><00:30:51.250><c> thank</c><00:30:51.520><c> you</c><00:30:51.610><c> for</c><00:30:51.760><c> work</c>

00:30:51.930 --> 00:30:51.940 align:start position:0%
all right Jordi thank you for work
 

00:30:51.940 --> 00:30:53.130 align:start position:0%
all right Jordi thank you for work
really<00:30:52.270><c> appreciate</c><00:30:52.660><c> it</c>

00:30:53.130 --> 00:30:53.140 align:start position:0%
really appreciate it
 

00:30:53.140 --> 00:30:59.550 align:start position:0%
really appreciate it
right<00:30:53.710><c> here</c>

00:30:59.550 --> 00:30:59.560 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:30:59.560 --> 00:31:03.450 align:start position:0%
 
I<00:31:00.960><c> was</c><00:31:01.960><c> hoping</c><00:31:02.170><c> you'd</c><00:31:02.350><c> indulge</c><00:31:03.100><c> us</c><00:31:03.220><c> a</c><00:31:03.310><c> little</c>

00:31:03.450 --> 00:31:03.460 align:start position:0%
I was hoping you'd indulge us a little
 

00:31:03.460 --> 00:31:05.370 align:start position:0%
I was hoping you'd indulge us a little
more<00:31:03.640><c> I'm</c><00:31:04.210><c> very</c><00:31:04.480><c> curious</c><00:31:04.720><c> about</c><00:31:04.870><c> how</c><00:31:05.110><c> you</c><00:31:05.140><c> made</c>

00:31:05.370 --> 00:31:05.380 align:start position:0%
more I'm very curious about how you made
 

00:31:05.380 --> 00:31:07.740 align:start position:0%
more I'm very curious about how you made
it<00:31:05.470><c> a</c><00:31:05.560><c> one-time</c><00:31:06.280><c> use</c><00:31:06.550><c> proof</c><00:31:06.940><c> with</c><00:31:07.330><c> the</c><00:31:07.420><c> private</c>

00:31:07.740 --> 00:31:07.750 align:start position:0%
it a one-time use proof with the private
 

00:31:07.750 --> 00:31:09.810 align:start position:0%
it a one-time use proof with the private
key<00:31:07.780><c> could</c><00:31:08.470><c> you</c><00:31:08.560><c> really</c><00:31:08.770><c> reiterate</c><00:31:09.130><c> that</c><00:31:09.430><c> one</c>

00:31:09.810 --> 00:31:09.820 align:start position:0%
key could you really reiterate that one
 

00:31:09.820 --> 00:31:10.440 align:start position:0%
key could you really reiterate that one
more<00:31:10.000><c> time</c>

00:31:10.440 --> 00:31:10.450 align:start position:0%
more time
 

00:31:10.450 --> 00:31:12.660 align:start position:0%
more time
the<00:31:11.020><c> one-time</c><00:31:11.440><c> proof</c><00:31:11.770><c> the</c><00:31:12.190><c> proof</c><00:31:12.220><c> that</c><00:31:12.490><c> not</c>

00:31:12.660 --> 00:31:12.670 align:start position:0%
the one-time proof the proof that not
 

00:31:12.670 --> 00:31:14.940 align:start position:0%
the one-time proof the proof that not
reducible<00:31:13.090><c> proof</c><00:31:13.390><c> you</c><00:31:13.540><c> mean</c><00:31:13.690><c> yeah</c><00:31:14.200><c> okay</c><00:31:14.770><c> yeah</c>

00:31:14.940 --> 00:31:14.950 align:start position:0%
reducible proof you mean yeah okay yeah
 

00:31:14.950 --> 00:31:16.860 align:start position:0%
reducible proof you mean yeah okay yeah
okay<00:31:14.980><c> that</c><00:31:15.460><c> is</c><00:31:15.610><c> imagine</c><00:31:16.300><c> that</c><00:31:16.330><c> I</c><00:31:16.510><c> want</c><00:31:16.750><c> to</c>

00:31:16.860 --> 00:31:16.870 align:start position:0%
okay that is imagine that I want to
 

00:31:16.870 --> 00:31:18.870 align:start position:0%
okay that is imagine that I want to
prove<00:31:17.080><c> that</c><00:31:17.140><c> I</c><00:31:17.530><c> am</c><00:31:17.590><c> from</c><00:31:17.890><c> a</c><00:31:18.010><c> specific</c><00:31:18.400><c> religion</c>

00:31:18.870 --> 00:31:18.880 align:start position:0%
prove that I am from a specific religion
 

00:31:18.880 --> 00:31:24.120 align:start position:0%
prove that I am from a specific religion
okay<00:31:19.720><c> I</c><00:31:21.270><c> don't</c><00:31:22.270><c> want</c><00:31:22.480><c> you</c><00:31:22.690><c> just</c><00:31:23.130><c> you</c>

00:31:24.120 --> 00:31:24.130 align:start position:0%
okay I don't want you just you
 

00:31:24.130 --> 00:31:25.410 align:start position:0%
okay I don't want you just you
understand<00:31:24.580><c> that</c><00:31:24.700><c> you</c><00:31:24.820><c> I</c><00:31:24.850><c> don't</c><00:31:25.120><c> want</c><00:31:25.300><c> you</c>

00:31:25.410 --> 00:31:25.420 align:start position:0%
understand that you I don't want you
 

00:31:25.420 --> 00:31:27.720 align:start position:0%
understand that you I don't want you
that<00:31:25.570><c> you</c><00:31:25.810><c> are</c><00:31:25.960><c> able</c><00:31:26.170><c> to</c><00:31:26.470><c> prove</c><00:31:26.860><c> to</c><00:31:27.340><c> everybody</c>

00:31:27.720 --> 00:31:27.730 align:start position:0%
that you are able to prove to everybody
 

00:31:27.730 --> 00:31:30.240 align:start position:0%
that you are able to prove to everybody
else<00:31:28.120><c> that</c><00:31:29.080><c> I'm</c><00:31:29.230><c> from</c><00:31:29.440><c> that</c><00:31:29.560><c> pollution</c><00:31:29.950><c> but</c>

00:31:30.240 --> 00:31:30.250 align:start position:0%
else that I'm from that pollution but
 

00:31:30.250 --> 00:31:32.820 align:start position:0%
else that I'm from that pollution but
actually<00:31:30.670><c> I</c><00:31:30.730><c> want</c><00:31:30.970><c> to</c><00:31:31.030><c> prove</c><00:31:31.330><c> you</c><00:31:31.540><c> okay</c><00:31:32.140><c> so</c><00:31:32.680><c> the</c>

00:31:32.820 --> 00:31:32.830 align:start position:0%
actually I want to prove you okay so the
 

00:31:32.830 --> 00:31:35.310 align:start position:0%
actually I want to prove you okay so the
proof<00:31:33.070><c> that</c><00:31:33.100><c> I'm</c><00:31:33.430><c> sending</c><00:31:33.730><c> to</c><00:31:34.060><c> you</c><00:31:34.240><c> is</c><00:31:34.600><c> a</c><00:31:34.900><c> proof</c>

00:31:35.310 --> 00:31:35.320 align:start position:0%
proof that I'm sending to you is a proof
 

00:31:35.320 --> 00:31:38.430 align:start position:0%
proof that I'm sending to you is a proof
so<00:31:36.190><c> I</c><00:31:36.220><c> am</c><00:31:36.340><c> proving</c><00:31:36.610><c> to</c><00:31:36.880><c> you</c><00:31:37.030><c> that</c><00:31:37.060><c> I</c><00:31:37.630><c> either</c>

00:31:38.430 --> 00:31:38.440 align:start position:0%
so I am proving to you that I either
 

00:31:38.440 --> 00:31:43.190 align:start position:0%
so I am proving to you that I either
I'm<00:31:39.250><c> from</c><00:31:39.580><c> that</c><00:31:39.730><c> religion</c><00:31:40.270><c> or</c><00:31:40.450><c> either</c><00:31:41.790><c> I'm</c><00:31:42.790><c> I</c>

00:31:43.190 --> 00:31:43.200 align:start position:0%
I'm from that religion or either I'm I
 

00:31:43.200 --> 00:31:47.600 align:start position:0%
I'm from that religion or either I'm I
hope<00:31:44.200><c> I</c><00:31:44.440><c> have</c><00:31:44.860><c> your</c><00:31:45.310><c> private</c><00:31:45.790><c> key</c><00:31:45.970><c> which</c><00:31:46.930><c> I</c><00:31:47.080><c> run</c>

00:31:47.600 --> 00:31:47.610 align:start position:0%
hope I have your private key which I run
 

00:31:47.610 --> 00:31:50.580 align:start position:0%
hope I have your private key which I run
okay<00:31:48.610><c> so</c><00:31:48.970><c> I</c><00:31:49.000><c> will</c><00:31:49.360><c> be</c><00:31:49.510><c> able</c><00:31:49.720><c> to</c><00:31:49.840><c> create</c><00:31:50.020><c> a</c><00:31:50.110><c> valid</c>

00:31:50.580 --> 00:31:50.590 align:start position:0%
okay so I will be able to create a valid
 

00:31:50.590 --> 00:31:54.300 align:start position:0%
okay so I will be able to create a valid
proof<00:31:50.860><c> if</c><00:31:51.280><c> I</c><00:31:51.550><c> have</c><00:31:51.850><c> your</c><00:31:52.030><c> private</c><00:31:52.420><c> key</c><00:31:52.600><c> or</c><00:31:52.840><c> I</c><00:31:53.590><c> am</c>

00:31:54.300 --> 00:31:54.310 align:start position:0%
proof if I have your private key or I am
 

00:31:54.310 --> 00:31:57.420 align:start position:0%
proof if I have your private key or I am
from<00:31:54.580><c> that</c><00:31:54.610><c> I'm</c><00:31:55.170><c> and</c><00:31:56.170><c> I'm</c><00:31:56.500><c> from</c><00:31:56.830><c> that</c><00:31:56.860><c> religion</c>

00:31:57.420 --> 00:31:57.430 align:start position:0%
from that I'm and I'm from that religion
 

00:31:57.430 --> 00:31:59.760 align:start position:0%
from that I'm and I'm from that religion
because<00:31:58.420><c> I</c><00:31:58.600><c> don't</c><00:31:58.810><c> have</c><00:31:58.990><c> your</c><00:31:59.140><c> private</c><00:31:59.590><c> key</c>

00:31:59.760 --> 00:31:59.770 align:start position:0%
because I don't have your private key
 

00:31:59.770 --> 00:32:04.190 align:start position:0%
because I don't have your private key
the<00:32:00.280><c> only</c><00:32:00.310><c> way</c><00:32:00.760><c> to</c><00:32:00.820><c> generate</c><00:32:01.420><c> a</c><00:32:01.780><c> proof</c><00:32:02.560><c> of</c><00:32:02.950><c> that</c>

00:32:04.190 --> 00:32:04.200 align:start position:0%
the only way to generate a proof of that
 

00:32:04.200 --> 00:32:10.650 align:start position:0%
the only way to generate a proof of that
kind<00:32:05.200><c> is</c><00:32:05.520><c> by</c><00:32:07.380><c> really</c><00:32:08.380><c> having</c><00:32:09.190><c> the</c><00:32:09.400><c> having</c><00:32:10.180><c> so</c>

00:32:10.650 --> 00:32:10.660 align:start position:0%
kind is by really having the having so
 

00:32:10.660 --> 00:32:13.440 align:start position:0%
kind is by really having the having so
happy<00:32:10.960><c> having</c><00:32:11.440><c> the</c><00:32:11.560><c> claim</c><00:32:11.830><c> that</c><00:32:12.640><c> says</c><00:32:13.150><c> that</c>

00:32:13.440 --> 00:32:13.450 align:start position:0%
happy having the claim that says that
 

00:32:13.450 --> 00:32:15.840 align:start position:0%
happy having the claim that says that
I'm<00:32:13.630><c> from</c><00:32:13.870><c> that</c><00:32:14.020><c> religion</c><00:32:14.500><c> okay</c><00:32:15.280><c> so</c><00:32:15.520><c> when</c><00:32:15.820><c> I</c>

00:32:15.840 --> 00:32:15.850 align:start position:0%
I'm from that religion okay so when I
 

00:32:15.850 --> 00:32:19.080 align:start position:0%
I'm from that religion okay so when I
send<00:32:16.210><c> you</c><00:32:16.300><c> that</c><00:32:16.570><c> proof</c><00:32:17.070><c> you</c><00:32:18.070><c> have</c><00:32:18.760><c> the</c>

00:32:19.080 --> 00:32:19.090 align:start position:0%
send you that proof you have the
 

00:32:19.090 --> 00:32:21.570 align:start position:0%
send you that proof you have the
warranty<00:32:19.660><c> the</c><00:32:20.410><c> time</c><00:32:20.650><c> from</c><00:32:20.920><c> that</c><00:32:21.100><c> religion</c>

00:32:21.570 --> 00:32:21.580 align:start position:0%
warranty the time from that religion
 

00:32:21.580 --> 00:32:23.960 align:start position:0%
warranty the time from that religion
because<00:32:22.150><c> I</c><00:32:22.300><c> don't</c><00:32:22.570><c> hold</c><00:32:22.750><c> your</c><00:32:22.930><c> private</c><00:32:23.290><c> key</c>

00:32:23.960 --> 00:32:23.970 align:start position:0%
because I don't hold your private key
 

00:32:23.970 --> 00:32:26.400 align:start position:0%
because I don't hold your private key
what<00:32:24.970><c> happened</c><00:32:25.420><c> when</c><00:32:25.540><c> you</c><00:32:25.690><c> take</c><00:32:25.930><c> that</c><00:32:26.110><c> proof</c>

00:32:26.400 --> 00:32:26.410 align:start position:0%
what happened when you take that proof
 

00:32:26.410 --> 00:32:30.480 align:start position:0%
what happened when you take that proof
out<00:32:26.700><c> outside</c><00:32:28.590><c> when</c><00:32:29.590><c> you</c><00:32:29.710><c> publish</c><00:32:30.100><c> that</c><00:32:30.130><c> proof</c>

00:32:30.480 --> 00:32:30.490 align:start position:0%
out outside when you publish that proof
 

00:32:30.490 --> 00:32:34.490 align:start position:0%
out outside when you publish that proof
you<00:32:31.420><c> are</c><00:32:31.540><c> saying</c><00:32:31.810><c> to</c><00:32:32.110><c> the</c><00:32:32.200><c> people</c><00:32:33.120><c> world</c>

00:32:34.490 --> 00:32:34.500 align:start position:0%
you are saying to the people world
 

00:32:34.500 --> 00:32:38.910 align:start position:0%
you are saying to the people world
surely<00:32:35.500><c> is</c><00:32:35.920><c> either</c><00:32:36.220><c> from</c><00:32:37.090><c> that</c><00:32:37.240><c> religion</c><00:32:37.780><c> or</c><00:32:37.960><c> I</c>

00:32:38.910 --> 00:32:38.920 align:start position:0%
surely is either from that religion or I
 

00:32:38.920 --> 00:32:44.630 align:start position:0%
surely is either from that religion or I
hold<00:32:39.930><c> my</c><00:32:40.930><c> private</c><00:32:41.440><c> key</c><00:32:42.120><c> so</c><00:32:43.200><c> everybody</c><00:32:44.200><c> knows</c>

00:32:44.630 --> 00:32:44.640 align:start position:0%
hold my private key so everybody knows
 

00:32:44.640 --> 00:32:47.820 align:start position:0%
hold my private key so everybody knows
that<00:32:45.640><c> you</c><00:32:45.790><c> hold</c><00:32:46.060><c> your</c><00:32:46.240><c> private</c><00:32:46.600><c> key</c><00:32:46.780><c> so</c><00:32:47.590><c> this</c>

00:32:47.820 --> 00:32:47.830 align:start position:0%
that you hold your private key so this
 

00:32:47.830 --> 00:32:51.570 align:start position:0%
that you hold your private key so this
you<00:32:48.700><c> can't</c><00:32:49.000><c> generate</c><00:32:49.390><c> as</c><00:32:49.630><c> many</c><00:32:49.900><c> proofs</c><00:32:50.580><c> even</c>

00:32:51.570 --> 00:32:51.580 align:start position:0%
you can't generate as many proofs even
 

00:32:51.580 --> 00:32:54.390 align:start position:0%
you can't generate as many proofs even
as<00:32:52.030><c> you</c><00:32:52.510><c> want</c><00:32:52.750><c> if</c><00:32:53.110><c> I'm</c><00:32:53.470><c> from</c><00:32:53.770><c> that</c><00:32:53.890><c> religion</c><00:32:54.250><c> or</c>

00:32:54.390 --> 00:32:54.400 align:start position:0%
as you want if I'm from that religion or
 

00:32:54.400 --> 00:32:58.830 align:start position:0%
as you want if I'm from that religion or
not<00:32:54.990><c> so</c><00:32:55.990><c> this</c><00:32:56.230><c> proof</c><00:32:56.620><c> to</c><00:32:57.340><c> the</c><00:32:57.430><c> people</c><00:32:57.820><c> is</c><00:32:58.300><c> not</c>

00:32:58.830 --> 00:32:58.840 align:start position:0%
not so this proof to the people is not
 

00:32:58.840 --> 00:33:00.780 align:start position:0%
not so this proof to the people is not
valid<00:32:59.230><c> anymore</c><00:32:59.320><c> it's</c><00:32:59.950><c> not</c><00:33:00.100><c> a</c><00:33:00.160><c> valid</c><00:33:00.460><c> proof</c>

00:33:00.780 --> 00:33:00.790 align:start position:0%
valid anymore it's not a valid proof
 

00:33:00.790 --> 00:33:03.360 align:start position:0%
valid anymore it's not a valid proof
other<00:33:01.630><c> thing</c><00:33:01.990><c> is</c><00:33:02.230><c> that</c><00:33:02.260><c> you</c><00:33:02.560><c> can</c><00:33:02.800><c> do</c><00:33:02.980><c> a</c><00:33:03.010><c> claim</c>

00:33:03.360 --> 00:33:03.370 align:start position:0%
other thing is that you can do a claim
 

00:33:03.370 --> 00:33:05.520 align:start position:0%
other thing is that you can do a claim
saying<00:33:03.760><c> Jordi's</c><00:33:04.150><c> from</c><00:33:04.300><c> that</c><00:33:04.450><c> religion</c><00:33:04.900><c> but</c>

00:33:05.520 --> 00:33:05.530 align:start position:0%
saying Jordi's from that religion but
 

00:33:05.530 --> 00:33:07.770 align:start position:0%
saying Jordi's from that religion but
then<00:33:05.740><c> it's</c><00:33:06.070><c> according</c><00:33:06.610><c> to</c><00:33:06.850><c> you</c><00:33:07.030><c> that</c><00:33:07.570><c> I</c><00:33:07.690><c> am</c>

00:33:07.770 --> 00:33:07.780 align:start position:0%
then it's according to you that I am
 

00:33:07.780 --> 00:33:09.690 align:start position:0%
then it's according to you that I am
from<00:33:07.930><c> that</c><00:33:08.080><c> religion</c><00:33:08.470><c> not</c><00:33:08.950><c> according</c><00:33:09.490><c> to</c><00:33:09.520><c> the</c>

00:33:09.690 --> 00:33:09.700 align:start position:0%
from that religion not according to the
 

00:33:09.700 --> 00:33:10.710 align:start position:0%
from that religion not according to the
church

00:33:10.710 --> 00:33:10.720 align:start position:0%
church
 

00:33:10.720 --> 00:33:13.349 align:start position:0%
church
the<00:33:11.080><c> time</c><00:33:11.229><c> from</c><00:33:11.409><c> that</c><00:33:11.559><c> religion</c><00:33:12.179><c> that's</c><00:33:13.179><c> the</c>

00:33:13.349 --> 00:33:13.359 align:start position:0%
the time from that religion that's the
 

00:33:13.359 --> 00:33:15.930 align:start position:0%
the time from that religion that's the
difference<00:33:13.749><c> of</c><00:33:13.989><c> course</c><00:33:14.529><c> when</c><00:33:15.039><c> I</c><00:33:15.070><c> proving</c>

00:33:15.930 --> 00:33:15.940 align:start position:0%
difference of course when I proving
 

00:33:15.940 --> 00:33:18.690 align:start position:0%
difference of course when I proving
something<00:33:16.179><c> to</c><00:33:16.359><c> you</c><00:33:16.599><c> I</c><00:33:16.749><c> am</c><00:33:16.840><c> giving</c><00:33:17.470><c> some</c><00:33:17.739><c> piece</c>

00:33:18.690 --> 00:33:18.700 align:start position:0%
something to you I am giving some piece
 

00:33:18.700 --> 00:33:22.169 align:start position:0%
something to you I am giving some piece
of<00:33:18.940><c> information</c><00:33:19.679><c> okay</c><00:33:20.679><c> but</c><00:33:21.369><c> I'm</c><00:33:21.609><c> giving</c><00:33:21.820><c> to</c>

00:33:22.169 --> 00:33:22.179 align:start position:0%
of information okay but I'm giving to
 

00:33:22.179 --> 00:33:22.649 align:start position:0%
of information okay but I'm giving to
you

00:33:22.649 --> 00:33:22.659 align:start position:0%
you
 

00:33:22.659 --> 00:33:26.219 align:start position:0%
you
I'm<00:33:22.799><c> not</c><00:33:23.799><c> giving</c><00:33:24.159><c> a</c><00:33:24.279><c> proof</c><00:33:24.749><c> so</c><00:33:25.749><c> what</c><00:33:25.899><c> I'm</c><00:33:26.049><c> not</c>

00:33:26.219 --> 00:33:26.229 align:start position:0%
I'm not giving a proof so what I'm not
 

00:33:26.229 --> 00:33:28.889 align:start position:0%
I'm not giving a proof so what I'm not
giving<00:33:26.529><c> is</c><00:33:26.769><c> the</c><00:33:27.070><c> capacity</c><00:33:27.669><c> to</c><00:33:27.909><c> prove</c><00:33:28.450><c> that</c>

00:33:28.889 --> 00:33:28.899 align:start position:0%
giving is the capacity to prove that
 

00:33:28.899 --> 00:33:32.580 align:start position:0%
giving is the capacity to prove that
that<00:33:28.960><c> information</c><00:33:29.409><c> is</c><00:33:29.950><c> valid</c><00:33:31.409><c> okay</c><00:33:32.409><c> and</c>

00:33:32.580 --> 00:33:32.590 align:start position:0%
that information is valid okay and
 

00:33:32.590 --> 00:33:34.799 align:start position:0%
that information is valid okay and
that's<00:33:32.739><c> that's</c><00:33:33.159><c> very</c><00:33:33.340><c> I</c><00:33:33.700><c> think</c><00:33:34.029><c> that's</c><00:33:34.179><c> very</c>

00:33:34.799 --> 00:33:34.809 align:start position:0%
that's that's very I think that's very
 

00:33:34.809 --> 00:33:36.570 align:start position:0%
that's that's very I think that's very
tricky<00:33:35.049><c> here</c><00:33:35.499><c> I</c><00:33:35.559><c> have</c><00:33:35.830><c> to</c><00:33:35.979><c> thank</c><00:33:36.159><c> you</c><00:33:36.369><c> a</c><00:33:36.399><c> lot</c>

00:33:36.570 --> 00:33:36.580 align:start position:0%
tricky here I have to thank you a lot
 

00:33:36.580 --> 00:33:39.989 align:start position:0%
tricky here I have to thank you a lot
here<00:33:37.119><c> to</c><00:33:37.149><c> Vitalik</c><00:33:37.899><c> because</c><00:33:38.639><c> the</c><00:33:39.639><c> rare</c><00:33:39.820><c> comes</c>

00:33:39.989 --> 00:33:39.999 align:start position:0%
here to Vitalik because the rare comes
 

00:33:39.999 --> 00:33:42.269 align:start position:0%
here to Vitalik because the rare comes
from<00:33:40.179><c> him</c><00:33:40.389><c> in</c><00:33:40.869><c> instances</c><00:33:41.559><c> but</c><00:33:41.769><c> I</c><00:33:41.830><c> think</c><00:33:42.099><c> it's</c><00:33:42.220><c> a</c>

00:33:42.269 --> 00:33:42.279 align:start position:0%
from him in instances but I think it's a
 

00:33:42.279 --> 00:33:50.430 align:start position:0%
from him in instances but I think it's a
cool<00:33:42.460><c> idea</c>

00:33:50.430 --> 00:33:50.440 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:33:50.440 --> 00:33:52.500 align:start position:0%
 
you

