WEBVTT
Kind: captions
Language: en

00:00:01.070 --> 00:00:10.690 align:start position:0%
 
[Applause]

00:00:10.690 --> 00:00:10.700 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:00:10.700 --> 00:00:17.150 align:start position:0%
 
okay<00:00:11.700><c> hi</c><00:00:15.320><c> today</c><00:00:16.320><c> I'm</c><00:00:16.619><c> going</c><00:00:16.800><c> to</c><00:00:16.859><c> be</c><00:00:16.980><c> talking</c>

00:00:17.150 --> 00:00:17.160 align:start position:0%
okay hi today I'm going to be talking
 

00:00:17.160 --> 00:00:19.929 align:start position:0%
okay hi today I'm going to be talking
about<00:00:17.400><c> their</c><00:00:17.849><c> knowledge</c><00:00:18.029><c> cruises</c><00:00:18.630><c> and</c><00:00:18.810><c> how</c>

00:00:19.929 --> 00:00:19.939 align:start position:0%
about their knowledge cruises and how
 

00:00:19.939 --> 00:00:22.189 align:start position:0%
about their knowledge cruises and how
zero<00:00:20.939><c> knowledge</c><00:00:21.090><c> proof</c><00:00:21.210><c> kind</c><00:00:21.720><c> of</c><00:00:21.779><c> enabled</c>

00:00:22.189 --> 00:00:22.199 align:start position:0%
zero knowledge proof kind of enabled
 

00:00:22.199 --> 00:00:24.650 align:start position:0%
zero knowledge proof kind of enabled
beautiful<00:00:22.770><c> coexist</c><00:00:23.400><c> with</c><00:00:23.820><c> privacy</c><00:00:24.300><c> and</c>

00:00:24.650 --> 00:00:24.660 align:start position:0%
beautiful coexist with privacy and
 

00:00:24.660 --> 00:00:30.470 align:start position:0%
beautiful coexist with privacy and
príncipe<00:00:25.109><c> transparently</c><00:00:25.949><c> drug</c><00:00:28.369><c> first</c><00:00:29.369><c> off</c><00:00:29.579><c> my</c>

00:00:30.470 --> 00:00:30.480 align:start position:0%
príncipe transparently drug first off my
 

00:00:30.480 --> 00:00:32.359 align:start position:0%
príncipe transparently drug first off my
name<00:00:30.509><c> is</c><00:00:30.779><c> Anne</c><00:00:30.930><c> Rose</c><00:00:31.169><c> I'm</c><00:00:31.469><c> the</c><00:00:31.770><c> co-host</c><00:00:31.980><c> of</c><00:00:32.279><c> a</c>

00:00:32.359 --> 00:00:32.369 align:start position:0%
name is Anne Rose I'm the co-host of a
 

00:00:32.369 --> 00:00:34.779 align:start position:0%
name is Anne Rose I'm the co-host of a
podcast<00:00:32.850><c> called</c><00:00:33.000><c> zero</c><00:00:33.420><c> knowledge</c><00:00:33.600><c> podcast</c><00:00:34.200><c> I</c>

00:00:34.779 --> 00:00:34.789 align:start position:0%
podcast called zero knowledge podcast I
 

00:00:34.789 --> 00:00:37.190 align:start position:0%
podcast called zero knowledge podcast I
also<00:00:35.789><c> throw</c><00:00:36.210><c> an</c><00:00:36.300><c> event</c><00:00:36.390><c> called</c><00:00:36.930><c> thisor</c>

00:00:37.190 --> 00:00:37.200 align:start position:0%
also throw an event called thisor
 

00:00:37.200 --> 00:00:39.319 align:start position:0%
also throw an event called thisor
knowledge<00:00:37.469><c> summit</c><00:00:37.950><c> and</c><00:00:38.219><c> the</c><00:00:38.760><c> next</c><00:00:39.030><c> one</c><00:00:39.180><c> will</c>

00:00:39.319 --> 00:00:39.329 align:start position:0%
knowledge summit and the next one will
 

00:00:39.329 --> 00:00:42.440 align:start position:0%
knowledge summit and the next one will
be<00:00:39.360><c> in</c><00:00:39.449><c> San</c><00:00:39.750><c> Francisco</c><00:00:40.260><c> on</c><00:00:40.500><c> October</c><00:00:40.949><c> 26th</c><00:00:41.760><c> so</c><00:00:42.390><c> I</c>

00:00:42.440 --> 00:00:42.450 align:start position:0%
be in San Francisco on October 26th so I
 

00:00:42.450 --> 00:00:43.430 align:start position:0%
be in San Francisco on October 26th so I
hope<00:00:42.600><c> to</c><00:00:42.720><c> see</c><00:00:42.870><c> you</c><00:00:42.930><c> there</c>

00:00:43.430 --> 00:00:43.440 align:start position:0%
hope to see you there
 

00:00:43.440 --> 00:00:46.520 align:start position:0%
hope to see you there
just<00:00:43.980><c> FYI</c><00:00:44.190><c> I</c><00:00:44.400><c> have</c><00:00:44.730><c> a</c><00:00:44.790><c> podcast</c><00:00:45.060><c> I'm</c><00:00:45.930><c> not</c><00:00:46.230><c> so</c>

00:00:46.520 --> 00:00:46.530 align:start position:0%
just FYI I have a podcast I'm not so
 

00:00:46.530 --> 00:00:48.229 align:start position:0%
just FYI I have a podcast I'm not so
used<00:00:46.739><c> to</c><00:00:46.920><c> giving</c><00:00:47.100><c> public</c><00:00:47.460><c> speaking</c><00:00:48.060><c> where</c>

00:00:48.229 --> 00:00:48.239 align:start position:0%
used to giving public speaking where
 

00:00:48.239 --> 00:00:50.090 align:start position:0%
used to giving public speaking where
there's<00:00:48.480><c> no</c><00:00:48.630><c> editing</c><00:00:49.020><c> so</c><00:00:49.440><c> please</c><00:00:49.860><c> bear</c><00:00:50.070><c> with</c>

00:00:50.090 --> 00:00:50.100 align:start position:0%
there's no editing so please bear with
 

00:00:50.100 --> 00:00:55.100 align:start position:0%
there's no editing so please bear with
me<00:00:52.190><c> alright</c><00:00:53.250><c> I'm</c><00:00:53.430><c> speaking</c><00:00:53.790><c> this</c><00:00:54.060><c> be</c><00:00:54.450><c> ten</c><00:00:54.750><c> and</c>

00:00:55.100 --> 00:00:55.110 align:start position:0%
me alright I'm speaking this be ten and
 

00:00:55.110 --> 00:00:58.100 align:start position:0%
me alright I'm speaking this be ten and
I<00:00:55.230><c> believe</c><00:00:55.500><c> this</c><00:00:55.680><c> is</c><00:00:55.739><c> the</c><00:00:56.130><c> privacy</c><00:00:56.820><c> track</c><00:00:57.360><c> so</c>

00:00:58.100 --> 00:00:58.110 align:start position:0%
I believe this is the privacy track so
 

00:00:58.110 --> 00:00:59.720 align:start position:0%
I believe this is the privacy track so
I'm<00:00:58.230><c> sure</c><00:00:58.440><c> you've</c><00:00:58.590><c> already</c><00:00:58.800><c> had</c><00:00:59.100><c> the</c><00:00:59.520><c> zero</c>

00:00:59.720 --> 00:00:59.730 align:start position:0%
I'm sure you've already had the zero
 

00:00:59.730 --> 00:01:01.250 align:start position:0%
I'm sure you've already had the zero
knowledge<00:00:59.850><c> proof</c><00:00:59.970><c> defined</c><00:01:00.690><c> for</c><00:01:00.989><c> you</c><00:01:01.050><c> I'm</c>

00:01:01.250 --> 00:01:01.260 align:start position:0%
knowledge proof defined for you I'm
 

00:01:01.260 --> 00:01:04.160 align:start position:0%
knowledge proof defined for you I'm
assuming<00:01:01.770><c> that</c><00:01:01.920><c> most</c><00:01:02.070><c> of</c><00:01:02.280><c> you</c><00:01:02.370><c> know</c><00:01:02.550><c> it</c><00:01:03.049><c> but</c><00:01:04.049><c> in</c>

00:01:04.160 --> 00:01:04.170 align:start position:0%
assuming that most of you know it but in
 

00:01:04.170 --> 00:01:06.560 align:start position:0%
assuming that most of you know it but in
case<00:01:04.320><c> you</c><00:01:04.469><c> don't</c><00:01:04.880><c> zero</c><00:01:05.880><c> knowledge</c><00:01:06.030><c> proof</c><00:01:06.149><c> is</c><00:01:06.540><c> a</c>

00:01:06.560 --> 00:01:06.570 align:start position:0%
case you don't zero knowledge proof is a
 

00:01:06.570 --> 00:01:08.719 align:start position:0%
case you don't zero knowledge proof is a
technique<00:01:07.079><c> for</c><00:01:07.439><c> showing</c><00:01:08.280><c> that</c><00:01:08.340><c> a</c><00:01:08.460><c> statement</c>

00:01:08.719 --> 00:01:08.729 align:start position:0%
technique for showing that a statement
 

00:01:08.729 --> 00:01:10.670 align:start position:0%
technique for showing that a statement
is<00:01:08.939><c> true</c><00:01:09.119><c> without</c><00:01:09.479><c> revealing</c><00:01:09.750><c> any</c><00:01:10.079><c> additional</c>

00:01:10.670 --> 00:01:10.680 align:start position:0%
is true without revealing any additional
 

00:01:10.680 --> 00:01:12.740 align:start position:0%
is true without revealing any additional
information<00:01:10.979><c> other</c><00:01:11.490><c> than</c><00:01:11.610><c> the</c><00:01:12.000><c> fact</c><00:01:12.390><c> that</c><00:01:12.570><c> the</c>

00:01:12.740 --> 00:01:12.750 align:start position:0%
information other than the fact that the
 

00:01:12.750 --> 00:01:14.870 align:start position:0%
information other than the fact that the
statement<00:01:13.140><c> is</c><00:01:13.229><c> true</c><00:01:13.259><c> so</c><00:01:14.189><c> for</c><00:01:14.340><c> example</c><00:01:14.700><c> if</c><00:01:14.789><c> I</c>

00:01:14.870 --> 00:01:14.880 align:start position:0%
statement is true so for example if I
 

00:01:14.880 --> 00:01:16.699 align:start position:0%
statement is true so for example if I
know<00:01:14.939><c> a</c><00:01:15.149><c> password</c><00:01:15.780><c> I</c><00:01:16.049><c> could</c><00:01:16.530><c> potentially</c>

00:01:16.699 --> 00:01:16.709 align:start position:0%
know a password I could potentially
 

00:01:16.709 --> 00:01:18.410 align:start position:0%
know a password I could potentially
prove<00:01:17.219><c> to</c><00:01:17.369><c> you</c><00:01:17.459><c> that</c><00:01:17.490><c> I</c><00:01:17.639><c> know</c><00:01:17.700><c> a</c><00:01:17.850><c> password</c>

00:01:18.410 --> 00:01:18.420 align:start position:0%
prove to you that I know a password
 

00:01:18.420 --> 00:01:21.109 align:start position:0%
prove to you that I know a password
without<00:01:18.899><c> revealing</c><00:01:19.229><c> what</c><00:01:19.590><c> that</c><00:01:19.740><c> word</c><00:01:20.249><c> is</c><00:01:20.429><c> you</c>

00:01:21.109 --> 00:01:21.119 align:start position:0%
without revealing what that word is you
 

00:01:21.119 --> 00:01:25.010 align:start position:0%
without revealing what that word is you
just<00:01:21.329><c> know</c><00:01:21.509><c> that</c><00:01:21.689><c> it</c><00:01:21.810><c> is</c><00:01:21.929><c> true</c><00:01:23.719><c> with</c><00:01:24.719><c> zernov</c>

00:01:25.010 --> 00:01:25.020 align:start position:0%
just know that it is true with zernov
 

00:01:25.020 --> 00:01:26.749 align:start position:0%
just know that it is true with zernov
proofs<00:01:25.380><c> you'll</c><00:01:25.560><c> have</c><00:01:25.709><c> a</c><00:01:25.740><c> proven</c><00:01:26.039><c> a</c><00:01:26.279><c> verifier</c>

00:01:26.749 --> 00:01:26.759 align:start position:0%
proofs you'll have a proven a verifier
 

00:01:26.759 --> 00:01:28.999 align:start position:0%
proofs you'll have a proven a verifier
the<00:01:27.659><c> underlying</c><00:01:28.139><c> information</c><00:01:28.409><c> is</c><00:01:28.829><c> kept</c>

00:01:28.999 --> 00:01:29.009 align:start position:0%
the underlying information is kept
 

00:01:29.009 --> 00:01:31.669 align:start position:0%
the underlying information is kept
secret<00:01:29.310><c> private</c><00:01:29.939><c> the</c><00:01:30.779><c> verifier</c><00:01:31.259><c> knows</c><00:01:31.529><c> that</c>

00:01:31.669 --> 00:01:31.679 align:start position:0%
secret private the verifier knows that
 

00:01:31.679 --> 00:01:33.590 align:start position:0%
secret private the verifier knows that
the<00:01:31.799><c> information</c><00:01:32.369><c> is</c><00:01:32.459><c> accurate</c><00:01:32.609><c> despite</c><00:01:33.240><c> not</c>

00:01:33.590 --> 00:01:33.600 align:start position:0%
the information is accurate despite not
 

00:01:33.600 --> 00:01:35.989 align:start position:0%
the information is accurate despite not
having<00:01:33.630><c> an</c><00:01:34.049><c> entire</c><00:01:34.350><c> picture</c><00:01:34.670><c> in</c><00:01:35.670><c> this</c><00:01:35.789><c> case</c>

00:01:35.989 --> 00:01:35.999 align:start position:0%
having an entire picture in this case
 

00:01:35.999 --> 00:01:37.969 align:start position:0%
having an entire picture in this case
there's<00:01:36.209><c> no</c><00:01:36.359><c> need</c><00:01:36.539><c> for</c><00:01:36.719><c> the</c><00:01:36.810><c> third</c><00:01:36.990><c> party</c><00:01:37.499><c> to</c>

00:01:37.969 --> 00:01:37.979 align:start position:0%
there's no need for the third party to
 

00:01:37.979 --> 00:01:39.949 align:start position:0%
there's no need for the third party to
act<00:01:38.069><c> as</c><00:01:38.249><c> a</c><00:01:38.279><c> sort</c><00:01:38.609><c> of</c><00:01:38.670><c> certifier</c><00:01:39.420><c> that</c><00:01:39.719><c> this</c><00:01:39.840><c> is</c>

00:01:39.949 --> 00:01:39.959 align:start position:0%
act as a sort of certifier that this is
 

00:01:39.959 --> 00:01:42.620 align:start position:0%
act as a sort of certifier that this is
true<00:01:40.229><c> the</c><00:01:40.889><c> zero</c><00:01:41.549><c> knowledge</c><00:01:41.700><c> proof</c><00:01:41.819><c> itself</c><00:01:42.389><c> the</c>

00:01:42.620 --> 00:01:42.630 align:start position:0%
true the zero knowledge proof itself the
 

00:01:42.630 --> 00:01:44.719 align:start position:0%
true the zero knowledge proof itself the
cryptographic<00:01:42.959><c> in</c><00:01:43.409><c> underpinnings</c><00:01:44.099><c> or</c><00:01:44.609><c> what</c>

00:01:44.719 --> 00:01:44.729 align:start position:0%
cryptographic in underpinnings or what
 

00:01:44.729 --> 00:01:47.960 align:start position:0%
cryptographic in underpinnings or what
confirm<00:01:45.439><c> the</c><00:01:46.439><c> truth</c><00:01:46.679><c> of</c><00:01:46.859><c> the</c><00:01:46.920><c> statement</c>

00:01:47.960 --> 00:01:47.970 align:start position:0%
confirm the truth of the statement
 

00:01:47.970 --> 00:01:51.860 align:start position:0%
confirm the truth of the statement
so<00:01:48.930><c> here's</c><00:01:49.140><c> a</c><00:01:49.230><c> little</c><00:01:49.440><c> example</c><00:01:50.420><c> later</c><00:01:51.420><c> tonight</c>

00:01:51.860 --> 00:01:51.870 align:start position:0%
so here's a little example later tonight
 

00:01:51.870 --> 00:01:54.290 align:start position:0%
so here's a little example later tonight
I<00:01:52.110><c> might</c><00:01:52.410><c> want</c><00:01:52.560><c> to</c><00:01:52.590><c> go</c><00:01:52.710><c> over</c><00:01:52.740><c> that</c><00:01:53.130><c> I</c><00:01:53.610><c> might</c>

00:01:54.290 --> 00:01:54.300 align:start position:0%
I might want to go over that I might
 

00:01:54.300 --> 00:01:56.690 align:start position:0%
I might want to go over that I might
want<00:01:54.480><c> to</c><00:01:54.510><c> go</c><00:01:54.600><c> to</c><00:01:54.660><c> karaoke</c><00:01:54.930><c> bar</c><00:01:55.440><c> actually</c><00:01:55.680><c> and</c><00:01:56.100><c> I</c>

00:01:56.690 --> 00:01:56.700 align:start position:0%
want to go to karaoke bar actually and I
 

00:01:56.700 --> 00:01:58.490 align:start position:0%
want to go to karaoke bar actually and I
learned<00:01:56.940><c> that</c><00:01:57.240><c> the</c><00:01:57.750><c> drinking</c><00:01:58.080><c> age</c><00:01:58.140><c> here</c><00:01:58.410><c> in</c>

00:01:58.490 --> 00:01:58.500 align:start position:0%
learned that the drinking age here in
 

00:01:58.500 --> 00:02:02.960 align:start position:0%
learned that the drinking age here in
Japan<00:01:58.950><c> is</c><00:01:59.100><c> 20</c><00:01:59.610><c> now</c><00:02:00.600><c> I'm</c><00:02:01.140><c> Way</c><00:02:01.650><c> over</c><00:02:01.980><c> 20</c><00:02:02.310><c> but</c><00:02:02.940><c> I</c>

00:02:02.960 --> 00:02:02.970 align:start position:0%
Japan is 20 now I'm Way over 20 but I
 

00:02:02.970 --> 00:02:04.970 align:start position:0%
Japan is 20 now I'm Way over 20 but I
mean<00:02:03.270><c> I</c><00:02:03.540><c> may</c><00:02:03.810><c> want</c><00:02:04.020><c> to</c><00:02:04.080><c> prove</c><00:02:04.380><c> that</c><00:02:04.410><c> I'm</c><00:02:04.710><c> over</c>

00:02:04.970 --> 00:02:04.980 align:start position:0%
mean I may want to prove that I'm over
 

00:02:04.980 --> 00:02:07.910 align:start position:0%
mean I may want to prove that I'm over
20<00:02:05.310><c> without</c><00:02:05.430><c> revealing</c><00:02:05.850><c> my</c><00:02:06.210><c> age</c><00:02:06.240><c> and</c><00:02:06.660><c> I</c><00:02:07.650><c> could</c>

00:02:07.910 --> 00:02:07.920 align:start position:0%
20 without revealing my age and I could
 

00:02:07.920 --> 00:02:09.800 align:start position:0%
20 without revealing my age and I could
potentially<00:02:08.280><c> do</c><00:02:08.729><c> that</c><00:02:08.910><c> with</c><00:02:09.479><c> the</c><00:02:09.600><c> zero</c>

00:02:09.800 --> 00:02:09.810 align:start position:0%
potentially do that with the zero
 

00:02:09.810 --> 00:02:10.550 align:start position:0%
potentially do that with the zero
knowledge<00:02:09.960><c> proof</c>

00:02:10.550 --> 00:02:10.560 align:start position:0%
knowledge proof
 

00:02:10.560 --> 00:02:12.890 align:start position:0%
knowledge proof
so<00:02:10.920><c> here</c><00:02:11.160><c> the</c><00:02:11.580><c> bouncer</c><00:02:11.970><c> would</c><00:02:12.210><c> know</c><00:02:12.360><c> that</c><00:02:12.390><c> I</c><00:02:12.780><c> am</c>

00:02:12.890 --> 00:02:12.900 align:start position:0%
so here the bouncer would know that I am
 

00:02:12.900 --> 00:02:14.810 align:start position:0%
so here the bouncer would know that I am
over<00:02:13.080><c> 20</c><00:02:13.530><c> but</c><00:02:13.890><c> he</c><00:02:13.920><c> wouldn't</c><00:02:14.250><c> actually</c><00:02:14.400><c> know</c><00:02:14.640><c> my</c>

00:02:14.810 --> 00:02:14.820 align:start position:0%
over 20 but he wouldn't actually know my
 

00:02:14.820 --> 00:02:19.670 align:start position:0%
over 20 but he wouldn't actually know my
age<00:02:16.490><c> okay</c><00:02:17.510><c> so</c><00:02:18.510><c> in</c><00:02:18.660><c> this</c><00:02:18.780><c> talk</c><00:02:19.080><c> I'm</c><00:02:19.140><c> gonna</c><00:02:19.500><c> be</c>

00:02:19.670 --> 00:02:19.680 align:start position:0%
age okay so in this talk I'm gonna be
 

00:02:19.680 --> 00:02:21.980 align:start position:0%
age okay so in this talk I'm gonna be
outlining<00:02:20.040><c> sort</c><00:02:20.640><c> of</c><00:02:20.730><c> privacy</c><00:02:21.270><c> and</c><00:02:21.480><c> blockchain</c>

00:02:21.980 --> 00:02:21.990 align:start position:0%
outlining sort of privacy and blockchain
 

00:02:21.990 --> 00:02:24.380 align:start position:0%
outlining sort of privacy and blockchain
as<00:02:22.710><c> well</c><00:02:22.920><c> as</c><00:02:23.010><c> transparency</c><00:02:23.580><c> walk</c><00:02:23.880><c> in</c><00:02:24.090><c> and</c><00:02:24.240><c> help</c>

00:02:24.380 --> 00:02:24.390 align:start position:0%
as well as transparency walk in and help
 

00:02:24.390 --> 00:02:26.510 align:start position:0%
as well as transparency walk in and help
it's<00:02:25.140><c> you're</c><00:02:25.260><c> not</c><00:02:25.440><c> proof</c><00:02:25.770><c> interactive</c><00:02:26.340><c> both</c>

00:02:26.510 --> 00:02:26.520 align:start position:0%
it's you're not proof interactive both
 

00:02:26.520 --> 00:02:27.920 align:start position:0%
it's you're not proof interactive both
of<00:02:26.670><c> those</c><00:02:26.760><c> so</c><00:02:27.120><c> first</c><00:02:27.420><c> let's</c><00:02:27.750><c> talk</c><00:02:27.870><c> about</c>

00:02:27.920 --> 00:02:27.930 align:start position:0%
of those so first let's talk about
 

00:02:27.930 --> 00:02:31.700 align:start position:0%
of those so first let's talk about
privacy<00:02:29.990><c> to</c><00:02:30.990><c> privacy</c><00:02:31.380><c> in</c><00:02:31.440><c> the</c><00:02:31.500><c> blockchain</c>

00:02:31.700 --> 00:02:31.710 align:start position:0%
privacy to privacy in the blockchain
 

00:02:31.710 --> 00:02:34.220 align:start position:0%
privacy to privacy in the blockchain
blockchain<00:02:32.610><c> isn't</c><00:02:33.000><c> actually</c><00:02:33.300><c> private</c><00:02:33.720><c> on</c><00:02:34.080><c> its</c>

00:02:34.220 --> 00:02:34.230 align:start position:0%
blockchain isn't actually private on its
 

00:02:34.230 --> 00:02:37.160 align:start position:0%
blockchain isn't actually private on its
own<00:02:34.430><c> but</c><00:02:35.430><c> I</c><00:02:35.760><c> didn't</c><00:02:36.210><c> turn</c><00:02:36.300><c> ultra</c><00:02:36.600><c> proofs</c><00:02:36.870><c> can</c>

00:02:37.160 --> 00:02:37.170 align:start position:0%
own but I didn't turn ultra proofs can
 

00:02:37.170 --> 00:02:40.070 align:start position:0%
own but I didn't turn ultra proofs can
make<00:02:38.060><c> the</c><00:02:39.060><c> transactions</c><00:02:39.690><c> on</c><00:02:39.810><c> the</c><00:02:39.870><c> blockchain</c>

00:02:40.070 --> 00:02:40.080 align:start position:0%
make the transactions on the blockchain
 

00:02:40.080 --> 00:02:43.400 align:start position:0%
make the transactions on the blockchain
private<00:02:40.680><c> so</c><00:02:41.670><c> the</c><00:02:41.880><c> most</c><00:02:42.060><c> famous</c><00:02:42.510><c> sort</c><00:02:43.260><c> of</c><00:02:43.320><c> the</c>

00:02:43.400 --> 00:02:43.410 align:start position:0%
private so the most famous sort of the
 

00:02:43.410 --> 00:02:45.710 align:start position:0%
private so the most famous sort of the
first<00:02:43.740><c> example</c><00:02:44.610><c> of</c><00:02:44.700><c> this</c><00:02:44.880><c> was</c><00:02:45.150><c> the</c><00:02:45.270><c> zero</c><00:02:45.510><c> cash</c>

00:02:45.710 --> 00:02:45.720 align:start position:0%
first example of this was the zero cash
 

00:02:45.720 --> 00:02:48.290 align:start position:0%
first example of this was the zero cash
paper<00:02:46.020><c> written</c><00:02:46.410><c> in</c><00:02:46.530><c> 2014</c><00:02:47.400><c> or</c><00:02:47.940><c> they</c><00:02:48.150><c> actually</c>

00:02:48.290 --> 00:02:48.300 align:start position:0%
paper written in 2014 or they actually
 

00:02:48.300 --> 00:02:49.910 align:start position:0%
paper written in 2014 or they actually
proposed<00:02:48.870><c> a</c><00:02:49.050><c> model</c><00:02:49.350><c> that</c><00:02:49.500><c> allowed</c><00:02:49.740><c> for</c>

00:02:49.910 --> 00:02:49.920 align:start position:0%
proposed a model that allowed for
 

00:02:49.920 --> 00:02:53.300 align:start position:0%
proposed a model that allowed for
confidential<00:02:50.550><c> payments</c><00:02:51.739><c> since</c><00:02:52.739><c> then</c><00:02:53.040><c> there's</c>

00:02:53.300 --> 00:02:53.310 align:start position:0%
confidential payments since then there's
 

00:02:53.310 --> 00:02:54.860 align:start position:0%
confidential payments since then there's
been<00:02:53.370><c> a</c><00:02:53.459><c> lot</c><00:02:53.670><c> of</c><00:02:53.700><c> protocols</c><00:02:54.239><c> that</c><00:02:54.360><c> are</c><00:02:54.420><c> emerged</c>

00:02:54.860 --> 00:02:54.870 align:start position:0%
been a lot of protocols that are emerged
 

00:02:54.870 --> 00:02:57.650 align:start position:0%
been a lot of protocols that are emerged
when<00:02:55.470><c> they're</c><00:02:55.590><c> using</c><00:02:55.860><c> this</c><00:02:56.790><c> kind</c><00:02:57.570><c> of</c>

00:02:57.650 --> 00:02:57.660 align:start position:0%
when they're using this kind of
 

00:02:57.660 --> 00:03:00.890 align:start position:0%
when they're using this kind of
underlying<00:02:58.110><c> idea</c><00:02:58.530><c> and</c><00:02:58.970><c> they're</c><00:02:59.970><c> creating</c><00:03:00.330><c> you</c>

00:03:00.890 --> 00:03:00.900 align:start position:0%
underlying idea and they're creating you
 

00:03:00.900 --> 00:03:02.540 align:start position:0%
underlying idea and they're creating you
know<00:03:01.020><c> like</c><00:03:01.230><c> for</c><00:03:01.620><c> example</c><00:03:01.680><c> Z</c><00:03:02.100><c> cash</c><00:03:02.310><c> they're</c>

00:03:02.540 --> 00:03:02.550 align:start position:0%
know like for example Z cash they're
 

00:03:02.550 --> 00:03:04.250 align:start position:0%
know like for example Z cash they're
creating<00:03:02.850><c> a</c><00:03:02.910><c> shielded</c><00:03:03.360><c> account</c><00:03:03.660><c> model</c><00:03:04.050><c> and</c>

00:03:04.250 --> 00:03:04.260 align:start position:0%
creating a shielded account model and
 

00:03:04.260 --> 00:03:06.650 align:start position:0%
creating a shielded account model and
what<00:03:04.860><c> that</c><00:03:05.010><c> actually</c><00:03:05.040><c> means</c><00:03:05.580><c> going</c><00:03:06.239><c> back</c><00:03:06.450><c> to</c>

00:03:06.650 --> 00:03:06.660 align:start position:0%
what that actually means going back to
 

00:03:06.660 --> 00:03:09.380 align:start position:0%
what that actually means going back to
my<00:03:06.780><c> example</c><00:03:06.840><c> with</c><00:03:07.320><c> the</c><00:03:07.440><c> bouncer</c><00:03:08.030><c> if</c><00:03:09.030><c> I</c><00:03:09.180><c> have</c><00:03:09.270><c> to</c>

00:03:09.380 --> 00:03:09.390 align:start position:0%
my example with the bouncer if I have to
 

00:03:09.390 --> 00:03:12.530 align:start position:0%
my example with the bouncer if I have to
pay<00:03:09.540><c> my</c><00:03:09.720><c> cover</c><00:03:10.130><c> I</c><00:03:11.130><c> could</c><00:03:11.580><c> potentially</c><00:03:11.820><c> pay</c><00:03:12.330><c> the</c>

00:03:12.530 --> 00:03:12.540 align:start position:0%
pay my cover I could potentially pay the
 

00:03:12.540 --> 00:03:16.190 align:start position:0%
pay my cover I could potentially pay the
cover<00:03:14.060><c> from</c><00:03:15.060><c> my</c><00:03:15.270><c> account</c><00:03:15.630><c> to</c><00:03:15.900><c> the</c><00:03:15.989><c> bars</c>

00:03:16.190 --> 00:03:16.200 align:start position:0%
cover from my account to the bars
 

00:03:16.200 --> 00:03:18.290 align:start position:0%
cover from my account to the bars
account<00:03:16.560><c> and</c><00:03:16.800><c> no</c><00:03:17.250><c> other</c><00:03:17.489><c> information</c><00:03:17.670><c> would</c>

00:03:18.290 --> 00:03:18.300 align:start position:0%
account and no other information would
 

00:03:18.300 --> 00:03:20.540 align:start position:0%
account and no other information would
be<00:03:18.450><c> made</c><00:03:18.660><c> obvious</c><00:03:19.530><c> to</c><00:03:19.739><c> the</c><00:03:19.830><c> bars</c><00:03:20.010><c> account</c><00:03:20.340><c> for</c>

00:03:20.540 --> 00:03:20.550 align:start position:0%
be made obvious to the bars account for
 

00:03:20.550 --> 00:03:22.250 align:start position:0%
be made obvious to the bars account for
example<00:03:20.910><c> the</c><00:03:21.000><c> bar</c><00:03:21.180><c> would</c><00:03:21.390><c> not</c><00:03:21.570><c> know</c><00:03:21.810><c> what</c><00:03:22.140><c> I've</c>

00:03:22.250 --> 00:03:22.260 align:start position:0%
example the bar would not know what I've
 

00:03:22.260 --> 00:03:24.259 align:start position:0%
example the bar would not know what I've
transferred<00:03:22.800><c> before</c><00:03:22.980><c> what</c><00:03:23.519><c> I</c><00:03:23.550><c> plan</c><00:03:23.880><c> on</c><00:03:23.910><c> doing</c>

00:03:24.259 --> 00:03:24.269 align:start position:0%
transferred before what I plan on doing
 

00:03:24.269 --> 00:03:26.180 align:start position:0%
transferred before what I plan on doing
in<00:03:24.360><c> the</c><00:03:24.390><c> future</c><00:03:24.480><c> the</c><00:03:25.350><c> bar</c><00:03:25.590><c> would</c><00:03:25.739><c> not</c><00:03:25.920><c> know</c><00:03:26.070><c> my</c>

00:03:26.180 --> 00:03:26.190 align:start position:0%
in the future the bar would not know my
 

00:03:26.190 --> 00:03:28.790 align:start position:0%
in the future the bar would not know my
balance<00:03:26.670><c> and</c><00:03:26.940><c> yet</c><00:03:27.570><c> using</c><00:03:28.260><c> as</c><00:03:28.500><c> your</c><00:03:28.620><c> knowledge</c>

00:03:28.790 --> 00:03:28.800 align:start position:0%
balance and yet using as your knowledge
 

00:03:28.800 --> 00:03:30.560 align:start position:0%
balance and yet using as your knowledge
proof<00:03:29.100><c> I</c><00:03:29.280><c> can</c><00:03:29.489><c> guarantee</c><00:03:30.000><c> that</c><00:03:30.150><c> there's</c><00:03:30.450><c> no</c>

00:03:30.560 --> 00:03:30.570 align:start position:0%
proof I can guarantee that there's no
 

00:03:30.570 --> 00:03:32.600 align:start position:0%
proof I can guarantee that there's no
double<00:03:30.959><c> spend</c><00:03:31.260><c> so</c><00:03:31.830><c> I</c><00:03:31.890><c> could</c><00:03:32.070><c> guarantee</c><00:03:32.220><c> that</c><00:03:32.459><c> I</c>

00:03:32.600 --> 00:03:32.610 align:start position:0%
double spend so I could guarantee that I
 

00:03:32.610 --> 00:03:34.430 align:start position:0%
double spend so I could guarantee that I
have<00:03:32.970><c> those</c><00:03:33.330><c> five</c><00:03:33.660><c> tokens</c><00:03:34.170><c> that</c><00:03:34.260><c> I'm</c>

00:03:34.430 --> 00:03:34.440 align:start position:0%
have those five tokens that I'm
 

00:03:34.440 --> 00:03:35.720 align:start position:0%
have those five tokens that I'm
transferring<00:03:34.890><c> and</c><00:03:35.370><c> that</c><00:03:35.459><c> I</c><00:03:35.489><c> haven't</c>

00:03:35.720 --> 00:03:35.730 align:start position:0%
transferring and that I haven't
 

00:03:35.730 --> 00:03:40.370 align:start position:0%
transferring and that I haven't
transferred<00:03:36.300><c> five</c><00:03:36.870><c> tokens</c><00:03:37.320><c> twice</c><00:03:39.380><c> although</c>

00:03:40.370 --> 00:03:40.380 align:start position:0%
transferred five tokens twice although
 

00:03:40.380 --> 00:03:43.280 align:start position:0%
transferred five tokens twice although
five<00:03:40.620><c> tokens</c><00:03:40.890><c> for</c><00:03:41.550><c> an</c><00:03:41.670><c> entry</c><00:03:42.060><c> if</c><00:03:42.390><c> it's</c><00:03:42.600><c> caramel</c>

00:03:43.280 --> 00:03:43.290 align:start position:0%
five tokens for an entry if it's caramel
 

00:03:43.290 --> 00:03:44.990 align:start position:0%
five tokens for an entry if it's caramel
if<00:03:43.530><c> it's</c><00:03:43.680><c> C</c><00:03:43.920><c> cash</c><00:03:44.160><c> would</c><00:03:44.400><c> be</c><00:03:44.519><c> very</c><00:03:44.790><c> very</c>

00:03:44.990 --> 00:03:45.000 align:start position:0%
if it's C cash would be very very
 

00:03:45.000 --> 00:03:48.030 align:start position:0%
if it's C cash would be very very
expensive<00:03:45.450><c> so</c><00:03:45.630><c> I'm</c><00:03:45.750><c> hoping</c><00:03:46.019><c> that</c><00:03:46.170><c> my</c><00:03:46.320><c> night</c>

00:03:48.030 --> 00:03:48.040 align:start position:0%
expensive so I'm hoping that my night
 

00:03:48.040 --> 00:03:50.680 align:start position:0%
expensive so I'm hoping that my night
all<00:03:49.040><c> right</c><00:03:49.160><c> so</c><00:03:49.489><c> in</c><00:03:49.640><c> a</c><00:03:49.730><c> traditional</c><00:03:49.880><c> payment</c>

00:03:50.680 --> 00:03:50.690 align:start position:0%
all right so in a traditional payment
 

00:03:50.690 --> 00:03:53.229 align:start position:0%
all right so in a traditional payment
system<00:03:51.050><c> this</c><00:03:51.860><c> makes</c><00:03:52.099><c> total</c><00:03:52.340><c> sense</c><00:03:52.459><c> like</c><00:03:53.000><c> you</c>

00:03:53.229 --> 00:03:53.239 align:start position:0%
system this makes total sense like you
 

00:03:53.239 --> 00:03:55.270 align:start position:0%
system this makes total sense like you
should<00:03:53.510><c> not</c><00:03:53.720><c> have</c><00:03:54.050><c> to</c><00:03:54.349><c> reveal</c><00:03:54.860><c> what</c><00:03:55.160><c> you've</c>

00:03:55.270 --> 00:03:55.280 align:start position:0%
should not have to reveal what you've
 

00:03:55.280 --> 00:03:56.979 align:start position:0%
should not have to reveal what you've
done<00:03:55.459><c> before</c><00:03:55.610><c> what</c><00:03:56.150><c> you've</c><00:03:56.239><c> done</c><00:03:56.390><c> after</c><00:03:56.780><c> and</c>

00:03:56.979 --> 00:03:56.989 align:start position:0%
done before what you've done after and
 

00:03:56.989 --> 00:03:59.830 align:start position:0%
done before what you've done after and
like<00:03:57.950><c> sales</c><00:03:58.190><c> a</c><00:03:58.340><c> business</c><00:03:58.849><c> I</c><00:03:59.090><c> paid</c><00:03:59.569><c> your</c>

00:03:59.830 --> 00:03:59.840 align:start position:0%
like sales a business I paid your
 

00:03:59.840 --> 00:04:02.350 align:start position:0%
like sales a business I paid your
invoice<00:04:00.349><c> I</c><00:04:00.680><c> would</c><00:04:01.220><c> not</c><00:04:01.400><c> want</c><00:04:01.670><c> you</c><00:04:01.730><c> to</c><00:04:02.030><c> then</c><00:04:02.180><c> be</c>

00:04:02.350 --> 00:04:02.360 align:start position:0%
invoice I would not want you to then be
 

00:04:02.360 --> 00:04:05.020 align:start position:0%
invoice I would not want you to then be
able<00:04:02.420><c> to</c><00:04:02.630><c> see</c><00:04:02.810><c> other</c><00:04:02.989><c> invoices</c><00:04:03.650><c> I've</c><00:04:03.800><c> paid</c><00:04:04.069><c> in</c>

00:04:05.020 --> 00:04:05.030 align:start position:0%
able to see other invoices I've paid in
 

00:04:05.030 --> 00:04:07.650 align:start position:0%
able to see other invoices I've paid in
the<00:04:05.150><c> past</c><00:04:05.180><c> or</c><00:04:05.630><c> plan</c><00:04:05.840><c> to</c><00:04:05.989><c> pay</c><00:04:06.140><c> in</c><00:04:06.230><c> the</c><00:04:06.319><c> future</c>

00:04:07.650 --> 00:04:07.660 align:start position:0%
the past or plan to pay in the future
 

00:04:07.660 --> 00:04:10.330 align:start position:0%
the past or plan to pay in the future
and<00:04:08.660><c> so</c><00:04:08.810><c> here</c><00:04:08.989><c> we</c><00:04:09.080><c> can</c><00:04:09.230><c> see</c><00:04:09.380><c> why</c><00:04:09.560><c> privacy</c><00:04:10.190><c> is</c>

00:04:10.330 --> 00:04:10.340 align:start position:0%
and so here we can see why privacy is
 

00:04:10.340 --> 00:04:13.390 align:start position:0%
and so here we can see why privacy is
valuable<00:04:10.790><c> for</c><00:04:10.940><c> the</c><00:04:11.360><c> blockchain</c><00:04:11.569><c> and</c><00:04:12.160><c> I</c><00:04:13.160><c> think</c>

00:04:13.390 --> 00:04:13.400 align:start position:0%
valuable for the blockchain and I think
 

00:04:13.400 --> 00:04:14.860 align:start position:0%
valuable for the blockchain and I think
if<00:04:13.489><c> we</c><00:04:13.610><c> want</c><00:04:13.760><c> watching</c><00:04:14.209><c> to</c><00:04:14.330><c> be</c><00:04:14.390><c> adopted</c><00:04:14.780><c> on</c>

00:04:14.860 --> 00:04:14.870 align:start position:0%
if we want watching to be adopted on
 

00:04:14.870 --> 00:04:16.810 align:start position:0%
if we want watching to be adopted on
large<00:04:15.170><c> scale</c><00:04:15.470><c> it</c><00:04:16.040><c> definitely</c><00:04:16.519><c> needs</c><00:04:16.639><c> to</c><00:04:16.730><c> be</c>

00:04:16.810 --> 00:04:16.820 align:start position:0%
large scale it definitely needs to be
 

00:04:16.820 --> 00:04:21.250 align:start position:0%
large scale it definitely needs to be
secured<00:04:17.359><c> accurate</c><00:04:18.019><c> but</c><00:04:18.590><c> private</c><00:04:19.959><c> ok</c><00:04:20.959><c> so</c><00:04:21.049><c> now</c>

00:04:21.250 --> 00:04:21.260 align:start position:0%
secured accurate but private ok so now
 

00:04:21.260 --> 00:04:22.719 align:start position:0%
secured accurate but private ok so now
let's<00:04:21.290><c> talk</c><00:04:21.560><c> about</c><00:04:21.620><c> transparency</c><00:04:22.280><c> in</c><00:04:22.639><c> the</c>

00:04:22.719 --> 00:04:22.729 align:start position:0%
let's talk about transparency in the
 

00:04:22.729 --> 00:04:26.710 align:start position:0%
let's talk about transparency in the
blockchain<00:04:24.070><c> okay</c><00:04:25.450><c> when</c><00:04:26.450><c> you</c><00:04:26.540><c> think</c><00:04:26.690><c> about</c>

00:04:26.710 --> 00:04:26.720 align:start position:0%
blockchain okay when you think about
 

00:04:26.720 --> 00:04:28.750 align:start position:0%
blockchain okay when you think about
like<00:04:26.960><c> Bitcoin</c><00:04:27.440><c> and</c><00:04:27.710><c> other</c><00:04:27.979><c> distributed</c><00:04:28.490><c> open</c>

00:04:28.750 --> 00:04:28.760 align:start position:0%
like Bitcoin and other distributed open
 

00:04:28.760 --> 00:04:30.700 align:start position:0%
like Bitcoin and other distributed open
block<00:04:29.000><c> chains</c><00:04:29.270><c> you</c><00:04:30.080><c> will</c><00:04:30.200><c> see</c><00:04:30.440><c> all</c><00:04:30.590><c> the</c>

00:04:30.700 --> 00:04:30.710 align:start position:0%
block chains you will see all the
 

00:04:30.710 --> 00:04:32.800 align:start position:0%
block chains you will see all the
transfers<00:04:31.130><c> being</c><00:04:31.430><c> made</c><00:04:31.580><c> and</c><00:04:31.850><c> even</c><00:04:32.570><c> though</c>

00:04:32.800 --> 00:04:32.810 align:start position:0%
transfers being made and even though
 

00:04:32.810 --> 00:04:35.290 align:start position:0%
transfers being made and even though
it's<00:04:33.080><c> just</c><00:04:33.200><c> account</c><00:04:33.620><c> numbers</c><00:04:33.979><c> there</c><00:04:34.820><c> are</c><00:04:35.060><c> I</c>

00:04:35.290 --> 00:04:35.300 align:start position:0%
it's just account numbers there are I
 

00:04:35.300 --> 00:04:36.850 align:start position:0%
it's just account numbers there are I
mean<00:04:35.900><c> I</c><00:04:35.960><c> think</c><00:04:36.020><c> we</c><00:04:36.229><c> all</c><00:04:36.260><c> know</c><00:04:36.440><c> this</c><00:04:36.560><c> there</c><00:04:36.770><c> are</c>

00:04:36.850 --> 00:04:36.860 align:start position:0%
mean I think we all know this there are
 

00:04:36.860 --> 00:04:38.590 align:start position:0%
mean I think we all know this there are
methods<00:04:37.250><c> for</c><00:04:37.340><c> tracking</c><00:04:37.850><c> money</c><00:04:38.030><c> I'm</c><00:04:38.150><c> watching</c>

00:04:38.590 --> 00:04:38.600 align:start position:0%
methods for tracking money I'm watching
 

00:04:38.600 --> 00:04:40.719 align:start position:0%
methods for tracking money I'm watching
keep<00:04:39.260><c> they're</c><00:04:39.440><c> using</c><00:04:39.770><c> on</c><00:04:39.919><c> and</c><00:04:40.100><c> off</c><00:04:40.190><c> ramps</c><00:04:40.610><c> like</c>

00:04:40.719 --> 00:04:40.729 align:start position:0%
keep they're using on and off ramps like
 

00:04:40.729 --> 00:04:43.360 align:start position:0%
keep they're using on and off ramps like
exchanges<00:04:41.419><c> or</c><00:04:41.870><c> cracking</c><00:04:42.380><c> mixer</c><00:04:42.710><c> like</c><00:04:42.889><c> systems</c>

00:04:43.360 --> 00:04:43.370 align:start position:0%
exchanges or cracking mixer like systems
 

00:04:43.370 --> 00:04:45.100 align:start position:0%
exchanges or cracking mixer like systems
there<00:04:43.940><c> are</c><00:04:43.970><c> in</c><00:04:44.360><c> tight</c><00:04:44.570><c> like</c><00:04:44.840><c> there's</c>

00:04:45.100 --> 00:04:45.110 align:start position:0%
there are in tight like there's
 

00:04:45.110 --> 00:04:47.140 align:start position:0%
there are in tight like there's
analytics<00:04:45.710><c> companies</c><00:04:46.130><c> dedicated</c><00:04:46.340><c> entirely</c>

00:04:47.140 --> 00:04:47.150 align:start position:0%
analytics companies dedicated entirely
 

00:04:47.150 --> 00:04:49.810 align:start position:0%
analytics companies dedicated entirely
just<00:04:47.750><c> to</c><00:04:48.050><c> figuring</c><00:04:49.040><c> out</c><00:04:49.130><c> who's</c><00:04:49.340><c> who</c><00:04:49.580><c> on</c><00:04:49.610><c> the</c>

00:04:49.810 --> 00:04:49.820 align:start position:0%
just to figuring out who's who on the
 

00:04:49.820 --> 00:04:50.430 align:start position:0%
just to figuring out who's who on the
blockchain

00:04:50.430 --> 00:04:50.440 align:start position:0%
blockchain
 

00:04:50.440 --> 00:04:52.630 align:start position:0%
blockchain
in<00:04:51.440><c> fact</c><00:04:51.680><c> criminals</c><00:04:52.190><c> have</c><00:04:52.340><c> been</c><00:04:52.370><c> caught</c>

00:04:52.630 --> 00:04:52.640 align:start position:0%
in fact criminals have been caught
 

00:04:52.640 --> 00:04:55.000 align:start position:0%
in fact criminals have been caught
because<00:04:52.880><c> these</c><00:04:53.330><c> Bitcoin</c><00:04:54.169><c> not</c><00:04:54.380><c> displayed</c><00:04:54.830><c> it</c>

00:04:55.000 --> 00:04:55.010 align:start position:0%
because these Bitcoin not displayed it
 

00:04:55.010 --> 00:04:56.740 align:start position:0%
because these Bitcoin not displayed it
and<00:04:55.250><c> that's</c><00:04:56.000><c> actually</c><00:04:56.120><c> a</c><00:04:56.330><c> really</c><00:04:56.510><c> good</c><00:04:56.690><c> thing</c>

00:04:56.740 --> 00:04:56.750 align:start position:0%
and that's actually a really good thing
 

00:04:56.750 --> 00:05:00.370 align:start position:0%
and that's actually a really good thing
like<00:04:57.740><c> transparency</c><00:04:58.580><c> is</c><00:04:59.150><c> a</c><00:04:59.180><c> good</c><00:04:59.479><c> thing</c><00:04:59.690><c> you</c>

00:05:00.370 --> 00:05:00.380 align:start position:0%
like transparency is a good thing you
 

00:05:00.380 --> 00:05:03.400 align:start position:0%
like transparency is a good thing you
can<00:05:00.560><c> actually</c><00:05:01.450><c> see</c><00:05:02.450><c> all</c><00:05:02.720><c> the</c><00:05:02.750><c> whole</c><00:05:03.169><c> things</c>

00:05:03.400 --> 00:05:03.410 align:start position:0%
can actually see all the whole things
 

00:05:03.410 --> 00:05:05.800 align:start position:0%
can actually see all the whole things
you<00:05:03.590><c> can</c><00:05:03.740><c> seal</c><00:05:03.950><c> the</c><00:05:04.100><c> transactions</c><00:05:04.880><c> if</c><00:05:05.180><c> you</c>

00:05:05.800 --> 00:05:05.810 align:start position:0%
you can seal the transactions if you
 

00:05:05.810 --> 00:05:07.960 align:start position:0%
you can seal the transactions if you
want<00:05:06.140><c> you</c><00:05:06.320><c> can</c><00:05:06.500><c> actually</c><00:05:06.650><c> take</c><00:05:07.250><c> like</c><00:05:07.430><c> keep</c><00:05:07.760><c> an</c>

00:05:07.960 --> 00:05:07.970 align:start position:0%
want you can actually take like keep an
 

00:05:07.970 --> 00:05:09.659 align:start position:0%
want you can actually take like keep an
authentic<00:05:08.419><c> copy</c><00:05:08.630><c> of</c><00:05:08.810><c> the</c><00:05:08.900><c> ledger</c>

00:05:09.659 --> 00:05:09.669 align:start position:0%
authentic copy of the ledger
 

00:05:09.669 --> 00:05:12.250 align:start position:0%
authentic copy of the ledger
transactions<00:05:10.669><c> are</c><00:05:11.120><c> mutable</c><00:05:11.630><c> and</c><00:05:11.690><c> you</c><00:05:11.810><c> can</c><00:05:11.990><c> see</c>

00:05:12.250 --> 00:05:12.260 align:start position:0%
transactions are mutable and you can see
 

00:05:12.260 --> 00:05:14.529 align:start position:0%
transactions are mutable and you can see
them<00:05:12.470><c> yourself</c><00:05:12.950><c> in</c><00:05:13.250><c> this</c><00:05:13.820><c> case</c><00:05:14.120><c> you</c><00:05:14.390><c> can</c>

00:05:14.529 --> 00:05:14.539 align:start position:0%
them yourself in this case you can
 

00:05:14.539 --> 00:05:17.050 align:start position:0%
them yourself in this case you can
actually<00:05:14.570><c> audit</c><00:05:15.289><c> any</c><00:05:16.039><c> transaction</c><00:05:16.850><c> and</c>

00:05:17.050 --> 00:05:17.060 align:start position:0%
actually audit any transaction and
 

00:05:17.060 --> 00:05:18.670 align:start position:0%
actually audit any transaction and
there's<00:05:17.210><c> no</c><00:05:17.330><c> middleman</c><00:05:17.750><c> needed</c><00:05:18.169><c> and</c><00:05:18.350><c> that</c>

00:05:18.670 --> 00:05:18.680 align:start position:0%
there's no middleman needed and that
 

00:05:18.680 --> 00:05:20.200 align:start position:0%
there's no middleman needed and that
means<00:05:18.919><c> you</c><00:05:19.100><c> know</c><00:05:19.280><c> where</c><00:05:19.580><c> your</c><00:05:19.729><c> tokens</c><00:05:20.090><c> are</c>

00:05:20.200 --> 00:05:20.210 align:start position:0%
means you know where your tokens are
 

00:05:20.210 --> 00:05:21.790 align:start position:0%
means you know where your tokens are
going<00:05:20.510><c> how</c><00:05:20.810><c> they're</c><00:05:20.990><c> being</c><00:05:21.169><c> used</c><00:05:21.229><c> and</c><00:05:21.710><c> who</c>

00:05:21.790 --> 00:05:21.800 align:start position:0%
going how they're being used and who
 

00:05:21.800 --> 00:05:24.670 align:start position:0%
going how they're being used and who
touches<00:05:22.070><c> them</c><00:05:22.930><c> but</c><00:05:23.930><c> if</c><00:05:24.110><c> you</c><00:05:24.229><c> think</c><00:05:24.410><c> back</c><00:05:24.650><c> to</c>

00:05:24.670 --> 00:05:24.680 align:start position:0%
touches them but if you think back to
 

00:05:24.680 --> 00:05:26.440 align:start position:0%
touches them but if you think back to
the<00:05:24.950><c> traditional</c><00:05:25.430><c> financial</c><00:05:25.910><c> world</c><00:05:26.060><c> large</c>

00:05:26.440 --> 00:05:26.450 align:start position:0%
the traditional financial world large
 

00:05:26.450 --> 00:05:28.240 align:start position:0%
the traditional financial world large
banks<00:05:26.840><c> and</c><00:05:26.900><c> other</c><00:05:27.080><c> institutions</c><00:05:27.169><c> will</c><00:05:28.039><c> lose</c>

00:05:28.240 --> 00:05:28.250 align:start position:0%
banks and other institutions will lose
 

00:05:28.250 --> 00:05:30.909 align:start position:0%
banks and other institutions will lose
customers<00:05:29.090><c> funds</c><00:05:29.570><c> in</c><00:05:30.050><c> ways</c><00:05:30.470><c> that</c><00:05:30.680><c> the</c><00:05:30.770><c> user</c>

00:05:30.909 --> 00:05:30.919 align:start position:0%
customers funds in ways that the user
 

00:05:30.919 --> 00:05:33.279 align:start position:0%
customers funds in ways that the user
may<00:05:31.160><c> not</c><00:05:31.370><c> be</c><00:05:31.550><c> aware</c><00:05:31.760><c> of</c><00:05:31.820><c> and</c><00:05:32.180><c> in</c><00:05:32.660><c> ways</c><00:05:32.840><c> the</c><00:05:33.139><c> user</c>

00:05:33.279 --> 00:05:33.289 align:start position:0%
may not be aware of and in ways the user
 

00:05:33.289 --> 00:05:34.300 align:start position:0%
may not be aware of and in ways the user
would<00:05:33.560><c> never</c><00:05:33.770><c> want</c>

00:05:34.300 --> 00:05:34.310 align:start position:0%
would never want
 

00:05:34.310 --> 00:05:36.580 align:start position:0%
would never want
so<00:05:34.669><c> there's</c><00:05:34.850><c> definitely</c><00:05:35.229><c> value</c><00:05:36.229><c> in</c><00:05:36.470><c> this</c>

00:05:36.580 --> 00:05:36.590 align:start position:0%
so there's definitely value in this
 

00:05:36.590 --> 00:05:37.580 align:start position:0%
so there's definitely value in this
transparency

00:05:37.580 --> 00:05:37.590 align:start position:0%
transparency
 

00:05:37.590 --> 00:05:40.159 align:start position:0%
transparency
into<00:05:37.830><c> these</c><00:05:37.950><c> larger</c><00:05:38.370><c> systems</c><00:05:38.900><c> this</c><00:05:39.900><c> is</c><00:05:40.020><c> why</c>

00:05:40.159 --> 00:05:40.169 align:start position:0%
into these larger systems this is why
 

00:05:40.169 --> 00:05:41.960 align:start position:0%
into these larger systems this is why
transparency<00:05:40.889><c> is</c><00:05:40.950><c> valuable</c><00:05:41.340><c> for</c><00:05:41.730><c> the</c><00:05:41.790><c> blob</c>

00:05:41.960 --> 00:05:41.970 align:start position:0%
transparency is valuable for the blob
 

00:05:41.970 --> 00:05:45.140 align:start position:0%
transparency is valuable for the blob
chain<00:05:42.530><c> okay</c><00:05:43.530><c> so</c><00:05:43.830><c> now</c><00:05:43.980><c> I've</c><00:05:44.100><c> outlined</c><00:05:44.610><c> the</c>

00:05:45.140 --> 00:05:45.150 align:start position:0%
chain okay so now I've outlined the
 

00:05:45.150 --> 00:05:47.390 align:start position:0%
chain okay so now I've outlined the
tension<00:05:45.690><c> between</c><00:05:45.870><c> these</c><00:05:46.110><c> two</c><00:05:46.350><c> forces</c><00:05:46.620><c> there's</c>

00:05:47.390 --> 00:05:47.400 align:start position:0%
tension between these two forces there's
 

00:05:47.400 --> 00:05:49.610 align:start position:0%
tension between these two forces there's
privacy<00:05:47.820><c> and</c><00:05:48.150><c> there's</c><00:05:48.360><c> transparency</c><00:05:48.660><c> there's</c>

00:05:49.610 --> 00:05:49.620 align:start position:0%
privacy and there's transparency there's
 

00:05:49.620 --> 00:05:52.460 align:start position:0%
privacy and there's transparency there's
private<00:05:50.250><c> we</c><00:05:50.430><c> want</c><00:05:50.700><c> our</c><00:05:50.970><c> you</c><00:05:51.690><c> know</c><00:05:51.780><c> we</c><00:05:52.260><c> want</c>

00:05:52.460 --> 00:05:52.470 align:start position:0%
private we want our you know we want
 

00:05:52.470 --> 00:05:54.530 align:start position:0%
private we want our you know we want
some<00:05:52.680><c> of</c><00:05:52.770><c> our</c><00:05:52.889><c> data</c><00:05:53.100><c> to</c><00:05:53.190><c> be</c><00:05:53.280><c> confidential</c><00:05:53.820><c> we</c>

00:05:54.530 --> 00:05:54.540 align:start position:0%
some of our data to be confidential we
 

00:05:54.540 --> 00:05:56.240 align:start position:0%
some of our data to be confidential we
also<00:05:54.720><c> want</c><00:05:55.050><c> some</c><00:05:55.260><c> key</c><00:05:55.470><c> information</c><00:05:55.770><c> to</c><00:05:56.160><c> be</c>

00:05:56.240 --> 00:05:56.250 align:start position:0%
also want some key information to be
 

00:05:56.250 --> 00:05:59.540 align:start position:0%
also want some key information to be
verifiable<00:05:56.730><c> and</c><00:05:57.120><c> honorable</c><00:05:57.660><c> and</c><00:05:58.460><c> even</c><00:05:59.460><c> though</c>

00:05:59.540 --> 00:05:59.550 align:start position:0%
verifiable and honorable and even though
 

00:05:59.550 --> 00:06:01.970 align:start position:0%
verifiable and honorable and even though
it<00:05:59.639><c> seems</c><00:05:59.669><c> contradictory</c><00:06:00.830><c> during</c><00:06:01.830><c> all</c><00:06:01.919><c> the</c>

00:06:01.970 --> 00:06:01.980 align:start position:0%
it seems contradictory during all the
 

00:06:01.980 --> 00:06:05.629 align:start position:0%
it seems contradictory during all the
proofs<00:06:02.310><c> and</c><00:06:02.550><c> blockchain</c><00:06:03.230><c> enable</c><00:06:04.430><c> both</c><00:06:05.430><c> of</c>

00:06:05.629 --> 00:06:05.639 align:start position:0%
proofs and blockchain enable both of
 

00:06:05.639 --> 00:06:10.490 align:start position:0%
proofs and blockchain enable both of
these<00:06:05.760><c> things</c><00:06:06.090><c> it's</c><00:06:06.630><c> kind</c><00:06:06.810><c> of</c><00:06:06.870><c> cool</c><00:06:08.690><c> so</c><00:06:09.690><c> yeah</c>

00:06:10.490 --> 00:06:10.500 align:start position:0%
these things it's kind of cool so yeah
 

00:06:10.500 --> 00:06:12.920 align:start position:0%
these things it's kind of cool so yeah
in<00:06:10.710><c> this</c><00:06:10.919><c> example</c><00:06:11.340><c> so</c><00:06:11.970><c> what</c><00:06:12.300><c> I</c><00:06:12.330><c> wanted</c><00:06:12.630><c> to</c><00:06:12.750><c> now</c>

00:06:12.920 --> 00:06:12.930 align:start position:0%
in this example so what I wanted to now
 

00:06:12.930 --> 00:06:15.560 align:start position:0%
in this example so what I wanted to now
is<00:06:13.139><c> talk</c><00:06:13.380><c> about</c><00:06:13.410><c> human</c><00:06:14.120><c> examples</c><00:06:15.120><c> of</c><00:06:15.300><c> hauser</c>

00:06:15.560 --> 00:06:15.570 align:start position:0%
is talk about human examples of hauser
 

00:06:15.570 --> 00:06:17.750 align:start position:0%
is talk about human examples of hauser
knowledge<00:06:16.110><c> proofs</c><00:06:16.440><c> and</c><00:06:16.710><c> watching</c><00:06:17.130><c> could</c>

00:06:17.750 --> 00:06:17.760 align:start position:0%
knowledge proofs and watching could
 

00:06:17.760 --> 00:06:19.750 align:start position:0%
knowledge proofs and watching could
potentially<00:06:18.389><c> help</c><00:06:18.630><c> with</c><00:06:18.840><c> compliance</c><00:06:19.260><c> and</c>

00:06:19.750 --> 00:06:19.760 align:start position:0%
potentially help with compliance and
 

00:06:19.760 --> 00:06:23.150 align:start position:0%
potentially help with compliance and
Trust<00:06:20.760><c> building</c><00:06:20.970><c> for</c><00:06:21.419><c> the</c><00:06:21.479><c> end-user</c><00:06:21.950><c> now</c><00:06:22.950><c> when</c>

00:06:23.150 --> 00:06:23.160 align:start position:0%
Trust building for the end-user now when
 

00:06:23.160 --> 00:06:24.920 align:start position:0%
Trust building for the end-user now when
I<00:06:23.190><c> was</c><00:06:23.400><c> preparing</c><00:06:23.820><c> these</c><00:06:24.150><c> lives</c><00:06:24.510><c> and</c><00:06:24.870><c> this</c>

00:06:24.920 --> 00:06:24.930 align:start position:0%
I was preparing these lives and this
 

00:06:24.930 --> 00:06:26.930 align:start position:0%
I was preparing these lives and this
presentation<00:06:25.440><c> I</c><00:06:25.770><c> wanted</c><00:06:26.370><c> to</c><00:06:26.460><c> use</c><00:06:26.580><c> examples</c>

00:06:26.930 --> 00:06:26.940 align:start position:0%
presentation I wanted to use examples
 

00:06:26.940 --> 00:06:30.920 align:start position:0%
presentation I wanted to use examples
from<00:06:27.180><c> like</c><00:06:27.450><c> healthcare</c><00:06:27.870><c> or</c><00:06:28.710><c> phony</c><00:06:29.060><c> or</c><00:06:30.060><c> even</c>

00:06:30.920 --> 00:06:30.930 align:start position:0%
from like healthcare or phony or even
 

00:06:30.930 --> 00:06:33.500 align:start position:0%
from like healthcare or phony or even
taxes<00:06:31.440><c> but</c><00:06:32.070><c> in</c><00:06:32.190><c> fact</c><00:06:32.400><c> a</c><00:06:32.610><c> lot</c><00:06:32.639><c> of</c><00:06:32.910><c> those</c><00:06:33.090><c> are</c><00:06:33.450><c> not</c>

00:06:33.500 --> 00:06:33.510 align:start position:0%
taxes but in fact a lot of those are not
 

00:06:33.510 --> 00:06:36.500 align:start position:0%
taxes but in fact a lot of those are not
very<00:06:33.900><c> developed</c><00:06:34.830><c> and</c><00:06:35.010><c> so</c><00:06:35.520><c> instead</c><00:06:35.729><c> the</c><00:06:36.300><c> focus</c>

00:06:36.500 --> 00:06:36.510 align:start position:0%
very developed and so instead the focus
 

00:06:36.510 --> 00:06:38.540 align:start position:0%
very developed and so instead the focus
of<00:06:36.840><c> these</c><00:06:36.990><c> examples</c><00:06:37.350><c> are</c><00:06:37.680><c> in</c><00:06:37.979><c> the</c><00:06:38.070><c> financial</c>

00:06:38.540 --> 00:06:38.550 align:start position:0%
of these examples are in the financial
 

00:06:38.550 --> 00:06:40.159 align:start position:0%
of these examples are in the financial
sector<00:06:38.850><c> and</c><00:06:39.090><c> I</c><00:06:39.540><c> think</c><00:06:39.570><c> it</c><00:06:39.780><c> makes</c><00:06:39.930><c> sense</c>

00:06:40.159 --> 00:06:40.169 align:start position:0%
sector and I think it makes sense
 

00:06:40.169 --> 00:06:41.570 align:start position:0%
sector and I think it makes sense
because<00:06:40.320><c> there's</c><00:06:40.650><c> so</c><00:06:40.830><c> much</c><00:06:40.950><c> activity</c><00:06:41.160><c> on</c>

00:06:41.570 --> 00:06:41.580 align:start position:0%
because there's so much activity on
 

00:06:41.580 --> 00:06:43.670 align:start position:0%
because there's so much activity on
chain<00:06:41.940><c> that</c><00:06:42.120><c> could</c><00:06:42.240><c> be</c><00:06:42.360><c> verified</c><00:06:42.600><c> it's</c><00:06:43.560><c> like</c>

00:06:43.670 --> 00:06:43.680 align:start position:0%
chain that could be verified it's like
 

00:06:43.680 --> 00:06:45.469 align:start position:0%
chain that could be verified it's like
it's<00:06:43.919><c> all</c><00:06:44.160><c> the</c><00:06:44.430><c> numbers</c><00:06:44.789><c> are</c><00:06:44.970><c> there</c><00:06:45.090><c> and</c><00:06:45.300><c> so</c><00:06:45.450><c> I</c>

00:06:45.469 --> 00:06:45.479 align:start position:0%
it's all the numbers are there and so I
 

00:06:45.479 --> 00:06:47.960 align:start position:0%
it's all the numbers are there and so I
think<00:06:45.900><c> a</c><00:06:46.110><c> lot</c><00:06:46.560><c> of</c><00:06:46.590><c> these</c><00:06:46.890><c> systems</c><00:06:47.430><c> will</c><00:06:47.610><c> first</c>

00:06:47.960 --> 00:06:47.970 align:start position:0%
think a lot of these systems will first
 

00:06:47.970 --> 00:06:52.159 align:start position:0%
think a lot of these systems will first
emerge<00:06:48.390><c> through</c><00:06:48.660><c> the</c><00:06:48.840><c> financial</c><00:06:49.320><c> sector</c><00:06:51.169><c> I</c>

00:06:52.159 --> 00:06:52.169 align:start position:0%
emerge through the financial sector I
 

00:06:52.169 --> 00:06:54.940 align:start position:0%
emerge through the financial sector I
want<00:06:52.650><c> to</c><00:06:52.710><c> talk</c><00:06:52.890><c> to</c><00:06:53.460><c> start</c><00:06:53.760><c> about</c><00:06:54.030><c> compliance</c>

00:06:54.940 --> 00:06:54.950 align:start position:0%
want to talk to start about compliance
 

00:06:54.950 --> 00:06:57.650 align:start position:0%
want to talk to start about compliance
this<00:06:55.950><c> is</c><00:06:56.100><c> probably</c><00:06:56.550><c> a</c><00:06:56.850><c> bit</c><00:06:57.030><c> of</c><00:06:57.060><c> a</c><00:06:57.180><c> dirty</c><00:06:57.390><c> word</c>

00:06:57.650 --> 00:06:57.660 align:start position:0%
this is probably a bit of a dirty word
 

00:06:57.660 --> 00:07:00.469 align:start position:0%
this is probably a bit of a dirty word
here<00:06:57.960><c> in</c><00:06:58.350><c> this</c><00:06:58.470><c> audience</c><00:06:58.680><c> but</c><00:06:59.160><c> I</c><00:06:59.460><c> I</c><00:06:59.970><c> think</c><00:07:00.360><c> this</c>

00:07:00.469 --> 00:07:00.479 align:start position:0%
here in this audience but I I think this
 

00:07:00.479 --> 00:07:02.810 align:start position:0%
here in this audience but I I think this
is<00:07:00.570><c> actually</c><00:07:00.690><c> really</c><00:07:01.020><c> cool</c><00:07:01.320><c> like</c><00:07:01.890><c> what</c><00:07:02.729><c> you</c>

00:07:02.810 --> 00:07:02.820 align:start position:0%
is actually really cool like what you
 

00:07:02.820 --> 00:07:04.880 align:start position:0%
is actually really cool like what you
could<00:07:02.970><c> do</c><00:07:03.090><c> is</c><00:07:03.240><c> earn</c><00:07:03.419><c> all</c><00:07:03.539><c> proofs</c><00:07:03.870><c> is</c><00:07:04.140><c> you</c><00:07:04.740><c> can</c>

00:07:04.880 --> 00:07:04.890 align:start position:0%
could do is earn all proofs is you can
 

00:07:04.890 --> 00:07:07.159 align:start position:0%
could do is earn all proofs is you can
potentially<00:07:05.220><c> cryptographically</c><00:07:05.850><c> prove</c><00:07:06.419><c> like</c>

00:07:07.159 --> 00:07:07.169 align:start position:0%
potentially cryptographically prove like
 

00:07:07.169 --> 00:07:09.050 align:start position:0%
potentially cryptographically prove like
a<00:07:07.200><c> fund</c><00:07:07.590><c> could</c><00:07:07.889><c> cryptographically</c><00:07:08.490><c> prove</c><00:07:08.910><c> its</c>

00:07:09.050 --> 00:07:09.060 align:start position:0%
a fund could cryptographically prove its
 

00:07:09.060 --> 00:07:11.120 align:start position:0%
a fund could cryptographically prove its
operating<00:07:09.600><c> compliantly</c><00:07:10.110><c> without</c><00:07:10.860><c> having</c>

00:07:11.120 --> 00:07:11.130 align:start position:0%
operating compliantly without having
 

00:07:11.130 --> 00:07:13.070 align:start position:0%
operating compliantly without having
just<00:07:11.280><c> disclosed</c><00:07:11.940><c> all</c><00:07:12.300><c> the</c><00:07:12.479><c> details</c><00:07:12.840><c> of</c><00:07:12.960><c> their</c>

00:07:13.070 --> 00:07:13.080 align:start position:0%
just disclosed all the details of their
 

00:07:13.080 --> 00:07:15.830 align:start position:0%
just disclosed all the details of their
actions<00:07:13.410><c> and</c><00:07:14.250><c> at</c><00:07:14.370><c> the</c><00:07:14.430><c> same</c><00:07:14.580><c> time</c><00:07:14.840><c> regulators</c>

00:07:15.830 --> 00:07:15.840 align:start position:0%
actions and at the same time regulators
 

00:07:15.840 --> 00:07:17.810 align:start position:0%
actions and at the same time regulators
could<00:07:16.169><c> be</c><00:07:16.260><c> given</c><00:07:16.530><c> visibility</c><00:07:17.130><c> in</c><00:07:17.340><c> the</c><00:07:17.460><c> general</c>

00:07:17.810 --> 00:07:17.820 align:start position:0%
could be given visibility in the general
 

00:07:17.820 --> 00:07:20.330 align:start position:0%
could be given visibility in the general
fund<00:07:18.000><c> information</c><00:07:18.330><c> but</c><00:07:19.320><c> not</c><00:07:19.500><c> access</c><00:07:20.010><c> to</c><00:07:20.160><c> other</c>

00:07:20.330 --> 00:07:20.340 align:start position:0%
fund information but not access to other
 

00:07:20.340 --> 00:07:22.190 align:start position:0%
fund information but not access to other
confidential<00:07:20.820><c> stuff</c><00:07:21.210><c> like</c><00:07:21.450><c> investing</c><00:07:22.050><c> half</c>

00:07:22.190 --> 00:07:22.200 align:start position:0%
confidential stuff like investing half
 

00:07:22.200 --> 00:07:25.550 align:start position:0%
confidential stuff like investing half
of<00:07:22.410><c> activities</c><00:07:23.370><c> lp's</c><00:07:23.880><c> or</c>

00:07:25.550 --> 00:07:25.560 align:start position:0%
of activities lp's or
 

00:07:25.560 --> 00:07:27.560 align:start position:0%
of activities lp's or
a<00:07:25.590><c> lot</c><00:07:26.040><c> of</c><00:07:26.190><c> these</c><00:07:26.310><c> examples</c><00:07:26.460><c> come</c><00:07:27.120><c> from</c><00:07:27.420><c> a</c>

00:07:27.560 --> 00:07:27.570 align:start position:0%
a lot of these examples come from a
 

00:07:27.570 --> 00:07:31.070 align:start position:0%
a lot of these examples come from a
specific<00:07:27.780><c> project</c><00:07:28.380><c> called</c><00:07:29.040><c> Endora</c><00:07:30.080><c> actually</c>

00:07:31.070 --> 00:07:31.080 align:start position:0%
specific project called Endora actually
 

00:07:31.080 --> 00:07:32.690 align:start position:0%
specific project called Endora actually
this<00:07:31.230><c> talk</c><00:07:31.500><c> was</c><00:07:31.710><c> inspired</c><00:07:32.160><c> a</c><00:07:32.310><c> little</c><00:07:32.430><c> bit</c><00:07:32.580><c> by</c>

00:07:32.690 --> 00:07:32.700 align:start position:0%
this talk was inspired a little bit by
 

00:07:32.700 --> 00:07:35.630 align:start position:0%
this talk was inspired a little bit by
Ben<00:07:33.450><c> fish</c><00:07:33.810><c> who</c><00:07:34.500><c> is</c><00:07:34.650><c> one</c><00:07:34.860><c> of</c><00:07:34.890><c> the</c><00:07:35.040><c> cofounders</c><00:07:35.220><c> of</c>

00:07:35.630 --> 00:07:35.640 align:start position:0%
Ben fish who is one of the cofounders of
 

00:07:35.640 --> 00:07:38.300 align:start position:0%
Ben fish who is one of the cofounders of
fedora<00:07:35.940><c> in</c><00:07:36.900><c> one</c><00:07:37.470><c> of</c><00:07:37.590><c> I</c><00:07:37.710><c> think</c><00:07:37.740><c> who</c><00:07:37.950><c> I</c><00:07:38.010><c> did</c><00:07:38.190><c> an</c>

00:07:38.300 --> 00:07:38.310 align:start position:0%
fedora in one of I think who I did an
 

00:07:38.310 --> 00:07:39.860 align:start position:0%
fedora in one of I think who I did an
interview<00:07:38.550><c> with</c><00:07:38.730><c> him</c><00:07:38.880><c> and</c><00:07:38.940><c> in</c><00:07:39.300><c> that</c><00:07:39.330><c> interview</c>

00:07:39.860 --> 00:07:39.870 align:start position:0%
interview with him and in that interview
 

00:07:39.870 --> 00:07:41.390 align:start position:0%
interview with him and in that interview
he<00:07:39.930><c> just</c><00:07:40.230><c> sort</c><00:07:40.350><c> of</c><00:07:40.380><c> mentioned</c><00:07:40.800><c> like</c><00:07:40.890><c> how</c><00:07:41.340><c> you</c>

00:07:41.390 --> 00:07:41.400 align:start position:0%
he just sort of mentioned like how you
 

00:07:41.400 --> 00:07:43.370 align:start position:0%
he just sort of mentioned like how you
could<00:07:41.610><c> actually</c><00:07:41.730><c> use</c><00:07:42.150><c> your</c><00:07:42.420><c> knowledge</c><00:07:42.960><c> proofs</c>

00:07:43.370 --> 00:07:43.380 align:start position:0%
could actually use your knowledge proofs
 

00:07:43.380 --> 00:07:47.510 align:start position:0%
could actually use your knowledge proofs
to<00:07:43.650><c> do</c><00:07:44.840><c> selective</c><00:07:45.840><c> disclosure</c><00:07:46.230><c> and</c><00:07:46.770><c> I</c><00:07:47.280><c> think</c>

00:07:47.510 --> 00:07:47.520 align:start position:0%
to do selective disclosure and I think
 

00:07:47.520 --> 00:07:49.880 align:start position:0%
to do selective disclosure and I think
that<00:07:47.790><c> is</c><00:07:48.240><c> one</c><00:07:48.540><c> of</c><00:07:48.630><c> the</c><00:07:48.720><c> powers</c><00:07:49.170><c> of</c><00:07:49.200><c> this</c><00:07:49.620><c> of</c>

00:07:49.880 --> 00:07:49.890 align:start position:0%
that is one of the powers of this of
 

00:07:49.890 --> 00:07:51.500 align:start position:0%
that is one of the powers of this of
this<00:07:50.100><c> technology</c><00:07:50.430><c> and</c><00:07:50.790><c> fedora</c><00:07:51.210><c> what</c><00:07:51.420><c> they</c>

00:07:51.500 --> 00:07:51.510 align:start position:0%
this technology and fedora what they
 

00:07:51.510 --> 00:07:52.610 align:start position:0%
this technology and fedora what they
actually<00:07:51.660><c> do</c><00:07:51.930><c> is</c><00:07:51.960><c> they</c><00:07:52.050><c> use</c><00:07:52.230><c> your</c><00:07:52.410><c> knowledge</c>

00:07:52.610 --> 00:07:52.620 align:start position:0%
actually do is they use your knowledge
 

00:07:52.620 --> 00:07:55.340 align:start position:0%
actually do is they use your knowledge
proofs<00:07:53.010><c> and</c><00:07:53.250><c> multi-party</c><00:07:54.240><c> computation</c><00:07:54.510><c> which</c>

00:07:55.340 --> 00:07:55.350 align:start position:0%
proofs and multi-party computation which
 

00:07:55.350 --> 00:07:57.740 align:start position:0%
proofs and multi-party computation which
they<00:07:55.560><c> related</c><00:07:55.980><c> an</c><00:07:56.280><c> equally</c><00:07:56.730><c> powerful</c><00:07:57.000><c> tool</c><00:07:57.480><c> to</c>

00:07:57.740 --> 00:07:57.750 align:start position:0%
they related an equally powerful tool to
 

00:07:57.750 --> 00:07:59.480 align:start position:0%
they related an equally powerful tool to
provide<00:07:58.380><c> both</c><00:07:58.620><c> privacy</c><00:07:59.100><c> and</c><00:07:59.310><c> transparency</c>

00:07:59.480 --> 00:07:59.490 align:start position:0%
provide both privacy and transparency
 

00:07:59.490 --> 00:08:02.510 align:start position:0%
provide both privacy and transparency
and<00:08:00.240><c> I</c><00:08:00.990><c> think</c><00:08:01.230><c> the</c><00:08:01.650><c> key</c><00:08:01.860><c> here</c><00:08:01.890><c> is</c><00:08:02.310><c> the</c>

00:08:02.510 --> 00:08:02.520 align:start position:0%
and I think the key here is the
 

00:08:02.520 --> 00:08:05.120 align:start position:0%
and I think the key here is the
selective<00:08:03.180><c> disclosure</c><00:08:03.590><c> it's</c><00:08:04.590><c> not</c><00:08:04.860><c> that</c>

00:08:05.120 --> 00:08:05.130 align:start position:0%
selective disclosure it's not that
 

00:08:05.130 --> 00:08:08.270 align:start position:0%
selective disclosure it's not that
everything<00:08:05.730><c> is</c><00:08:06.020><c> transparent</c><00:08:07.020><c> it's</c><00:08:07.500><c> not</c><00:08:08.100><c> that</c>

00:08:08.270 --> 00:08:08.280 align:start position:0%
everything is transparent it's not that
 

00:08:08.280 --> 00:08:09.710 align:start position:0%
everything is transparent it's not that
everything<00:08:08.580><c> is</c><00:08:09.030><c> kept</c><00:08:09.360><c> private</c>

00:08:09.710 --> 00:08:09.720 align:start position:0%
everything is kept private
 

00:08:09.720 --> 00:08:11.060 align:start position:0%
everything is kept private
you<00:08:09.900><c> actually</c><00:08:10.110><c> can</c><00:08:10.440><c> allow</c><00:08:10.620><c> certain</c>

00:08:11.060 --> 00:08:11.070 align:start position:0%
you actually can allow certain
 

00:08:11.070 --> 00:08:13.040 align:start position:0%
you actually can allow certain
information<00:08:11.370><c> through</c><00:08:11.880><c> and</c><00:08:12.120><c> keep</c><00:08:12.810><c> other</c>

00:08:13.040 --> 00:08:13.050 align:start position:0%
information through and keep other
 

00:08:13.050 --> 00:08:17.630 align:start position:0%
information through and keep other
information<00:08:13.770><c> private</c><00:08:16.220><c> so</c><00:08:17.220><c> the</c><00:08:17.310><c> first</c><00:08:17.520><c> example</c>

00:08:17.630 --> 00:08:17.640 align:start position:0%
information private so the first example
 

00:08:17.640 --> 00:08:20.660 align:start position:0%
information private so the first example
that<00:08:18.000><c> I</c><00:08:18.150><c> want</c><00:08:18.360><c> to</c><00:08:18.420><c> share</c><00:08:19.070><c> is</c><00:08:20.070><c> this</c><00:08:20.280><c> idea</c><00:08:20.610><c> of</c>

00:08:20.660 --> 00:08:20.670 align:start position:0%
that I want to share is this idea of
 

00:08:20.670 --> 00:08:23.990 align:start position:0%
that I want to share is this idea of
ensuring<00:08:21.090><c> kyc</c><00:08:21.630><c> so</c><00:08:22.470><c> kyc</c><00:08:23.010><c> know</c><00:08:23.400><c> your</c><00:08:23.550><c> customer</c>

00:08:23.990 --> 00:08:24.000 align:start position:0%
ensuring kyc so kyc know your customer
 

00:08:24.000 --> 00:08:25.520 align:start position:0%
ensuring kyc so kyc know your customer
this<00:08:24.240><c> is</c><00:08:24.420><c> something</c><00:08:24.720><c> that</c><00:08:24.840><c> you</c><00:08:24.930><c> need</c><00:08:25.080><c> to</c><00:08:25.230><c> do</c><00:08:25.350><c> if</c>

00:08:25.520 --> 00:08:25.530 align:start position:0%
this is something that you need to do if
 

00:08:25.530 --> 00:08:26.810 align:start position:0%
this is something that you need to do if
you're<00:08:25.680><c> running</c><00:08:25.860><c> an</c><00:08:26.070><c> exchange</c><00:08:26.430><c> if</c><00:08:26.700><c> you're</c>

00:08:26.810 --> 00:08:26.820 align:start position:0%
you're running an exchange if you're
 

00:08:26.820 --> 00:08:28.430 align:start position:0%
you're running an exchange if you're
buying<00:08:27.090><c> cryptocurrency</c><00:08:27.660><c> if</c><00:08:28.050><c> you're</c><00:08:28.170><c> doing</c>

00:08:28.430 --> 00:08:28.440 align:start position:0%
buying cryptocurrency if you're doing
 

00:08:28.440 --> 00:08:31.070 align:start position:0%
buying cryptocurrency if you're doing
investments<00:08:29.120><c> what</c><00:08:30.120><c> you</c><00:08:30.210><c> could</c><00:08:30.450><c> do</c><00:08:30.600><c> here</c><00:08:30.870><c> is</c>

00:08:31.070 --> 00:08:31.080 align:start position:0%
investments what you could do here is
 

00:08:31.080 --> 00:08:34.040 align:start position:0%
investments what you could do here is
actually<00:08:31.590><c> prove</c><00:08:32.040><c> that</c><00:08:32.460><c> a</c><00:08:33.300><c> participant</c><00:08:33.960><c> has</c>

00:08:34.040 --> 00:08:34.050 align:start position:0%
actually prove that a participant has
 

00:08:34.050 --> 00:08:36.800 align:start position:0%
actually prove that a participant has
passed<00:08:34.350><c> a</c><00:08:34.650><c> kyc</c><00:08:35.190><c> by</c><00:08:35.790><c> a</c><00:08:35.820><c> third</c><00:08:36.090><c> party</c><00:08:36.420><c> so</c><00:08:36.690><c> what</c>

00:08:36.800 --> 00:08:36.810 align:start position:0%
passed a kyc by a third party so what
 

00:08:36.810 --> 00:08:38.180 align:start position:0%
passed a kyc by a third party so what
you<00:08:36.900><c> do</c><00:08:37.050><c> is</c><00:08:37.110><c> you</c><00:08:37.260><c> basically</c><00:08:37.440><c> take</c><00:08:37.860><c> a</c><00:08:37.920><c> white</c>

00:08:38.180 --> 00:08:38.190 align:start position:0%
you do is you basically take a white
 

00:08:38.190 --> 00:08:40.880 align:start position:0%
you do is you basically take a white
list<00:08:38.430><c> and</c><00:08:38.670><c> the</c><00:08:39.660><c> white</c><00:08:39.990><c> list</c><00:08:40.140><c> of</c><00:08:40.290><c> addresses</c><00:08:40.470><c> and</c>

00:08:40.880 --> 00:08:40.890 align:start position:0%
list and the white list of addresses and
 

00:08:40.890 --> 00:08:43.219 align:start position:0%
list and the white list of addresses and
sort<00:08:41.760><c> of</c><00:08:41.820><c> your</c><00:08:42.210><c> selection</c><00:08:42.720><c> of</c><00:08:42.780><c> addresses</c>

00:08:43.219 --> 00:08:43.229 align:start position:0%
sort of your selection of addresses
 

00:08:43.229 --> 00:08:45.110 align:start position:0%
sort of your selection of addresses
match<00:08:43.530><c> that</c><00:08:43.890><c> and</c><00:08:44.100><c> then</c><00:08:44.490><c> provide</c><00:08:44.820><c> a</c><00:08:44.850><c> proof</c>

00:08:45.110 --> 00:08:45.120 align:start position:0%
match that and then provide a proof
 

00:08:45.120 --> 00:08:48.020 align:start position:0%
match that and then provide a proof
saying<00:08:45.480><c> like</c><00:08:45.720><c> this</c><00:08:46.070><c> like</c><00:08:47.070><c> these</c><00:08:47.460><c> addresses</c>

00:08:48.020 --> 00:08:48.030 align:start position:0%
saying like this like these addresses
 

00:08:48.030 --> 00:08:49.760 align:start position:0%
saying like this like these addresses
are<00:08:48.210><c> on</c><00:08:48.270><c> the</c><00:08:48.570><c> white</c><00:08:48.690><c> list</c><00:08:48.900><c> however</c><00:08:49.410><c> you</c>

00:08:49.760 --> 00:08:49.770 align:start position:0%
are on the white list however you
 

00:08:49.770 --> 00:08:51.620 align:start position:0%
are on the white list however you
wouldn't<00:08:50.070><c> actually</c><00:08:50.280><c> be</c><00:08:50.580><c> disclosing</c><00:08:51.120><c> which</c>

00:08:51.620 --> 00:08:51.630 align:start position:0%
wouldn't actually be disclosing which
 

00:08:51.630 --> 00:08:53.930 align:start position:0%
wouldn't actually be disclosing which
addresses<00:08:52.170><c> how</c><00:08:52.470><c> many</c><00:08:52.710><c> addresses</c><00:08:52.950><c> you</c>

00:08:53.930 --> 00:08:53.940 align:start position:0%
addresses how many addresses you
 

00:08:53.940 --> 00:08:55.430 align:start position:0%
addresses how many addresses you
wouldn't<00:08:54.180><c> have</c><00:08:54.300><c> no</c><00:08:54.720><c> one</c><00:08:54.900><c> looking</c><00:08:55.200><c> for</c><00:08:55.380><c> the</c>

00:08:55.430 --> 00:08:55.440 align:start position:0%
wouldn't have no one looking for the
 

00:08:55.440 --> 00:08:57.500 align:start position:0%
wouldn't have no one looking for the
outside<00:08:55.710><c> would</c><00:08:55.830><c> be</c><00:08:55.950><c> able</c><00:08:56.010><c> to</c><00:08:56.130><c> tell</c><00:08:56.400><c> who</c><00:08:57.180><c> on</c>

00:08:57.500 --> 00:08:57.510 align:start position:0%
outside would be able to tell who on
 

00:08:57.510 --> 00:08:59.480 align:start position:0%
outside would be able to tell who on
that<00:08:57.540><c> list</c><00:08:58.020><c> has</c><00:08:58.350><c> been</c><00:08:58.560><c> kind</c><00:08:59.010><c> of</c><00:08:59.040><c> went</c><00:08:59.430><c> through</c>

00:08:59.480 --> 00:08:59.490 align:start position:0%
that list has been kind of went through
 

00:08:59.490 --> 00:09:02.060 align:start position:0%
that list has been kind of went through
and<00:08:59.970><c> so</c><00:09:00.390><c> here</c><00:09:00.570><c> you</c><00:09:00.720><c> see</c><00:09:00.930><c> this</c><00:09:01.070><c> selective</c>

00:09:02.060 --> 00:09:02.070 align:start position:0%
and so here you see this selective
 

00:09:02.070 --> 00:09:05.600 align:start position:0%
and so here you see this selective
disclosure<00:09:03.830><c> so</c><00:09:04.830><c> another</c><00:09:05.070><c> one</c><00:09:05.250><c> would</c><00:09:05.400><c> be</c><00:09:05.490><c> to</c>

00:09:05.600 --> 00:09:05.610 align:start position:0%
disclosure so another one would be to
 

00:09:05.610 --> 00:09:08.840 align:start position:0%
disclosure so another one would be to
prevent<00:09:05.940><c> capital</c><00:09:06.510><c> management</c><00:09:06.810><c> fraud</c><00:09:07.850><c> funds</c>

00:09:08.840 --> 00:09:08.850 align:start position:0%
prevent capital management fraud funds
 

00:09:08.850 --> 00:09:10.580 align:start position:0%
prevent capital management fraud funds
could<00:09:09.090><c> demonstrate</c><00:09:09.330><c> statements</c><00:09:10.110><c> about</c><00:09:10.290><c> flows</c>

00:09:10.580 --> 00:09:10.590 align:start position:0%
could demonstrate statements about flows
 

00:09:10.590 --> 00:09:12.380 align:start position:0%
could demonstrate statements about flows
even<00:09:10.860><c> out</c><00:09:11.130><c> from</c><00:09:11.340><c> addresses</c><00:09:11.790><c> belonging</c><00:09:12.210><c> to</c>

00:09:12.380 --> 00:09:12.390 align:start position:0%
even out from addresses belonging to
 

00:09:12.390 --> 00:09:13.720 align:start position:0%
even out from addresses belonging to
investors<00:09:12.870><c> versus</c><00:09:13.230><c> invest</c>

00:09:13.720 --> 00:09:13.730 align:start position:0%
investors versus invest
 

00:09:13.730 --> 00:09:15.250 align:start position:0%
investors versus invest
and<00:09:14.030><c> this</c><00:09:14.450><c> could</c><00:09:14.690><c> actually</c><00:09:14.840><c> prevent</c>

00:09:15.250 --> 00:09:15.260 align:start position:0%
and this could actually prevent
 

00:09:15.260 --> 00:09:19.780 align:start position:0%
and this could actually prevent
ponzi-scheme<00:09:15.740><c> and</c><00:09:16.250><c> embezzlement</c><00:09:18.550><c> so</c><00:09:19.550><c> another</c>

00:09:19.780 --> 00:09:19.790 align:start position:0%
ponzi-scheme and embezzlement so another
 

00:09:19.790 --> 00:09:21.940 align:start position:0%
ponzi-scheme and embezzlement so another
example<00:09:19.940><c> would</c><00:09:20.420><c> be</c><00:09:20.480><c> a</c><00:09:20.870><c> server</c><00:09:21.590><c> couple</c>

00:09:21.940 --> 00:09:21.950 align:start position:0%
example would be a server couple
 

00:09:21.950 --> 00:09:24.610 align:start position:0%
example would be a server couple
examples<00:09:22.400><c> are</c><00:09:22.960><c> providing</c><00:09:23.960><c> better</c><00:09:24.200><c> business</c>

00:09:24.610 --> 00:09:24.620 align:start position:0%
examples are providing better business
 

00:09:24.620 --> 00:09:27.970 align:start position:0%
examples are providing better business
practices<00:09:24.770><c> for</c><00:09:25.370><c> trust-building</c><00:09:26.800><c> so</c><00:09:27.800><c> here's</c>

00:09:27.970 --> 00:09:27.980 align:start position:0%
practices for trust-building so here's
 

00:09:27.980 --> 00:09:29.080 align:start position:0%
practices for trust-building so here's
another<00:09:28.130><c> example</c><00:09:28.700><c> where</c><00:09:28.820><c> you</c><00:09:28.850><c> could</c>

00:09:29.080 --> 00:09:29.090 align:start position:0%
another example where you could
 

00:09:29.090 --> 00:09:31.060 align:start position:0%
another example where you could
communicate<00:09:29.510><c> better</c><00:09:29.750><c> with</c><00:09:30.080><c> investors</c><00:09:30.740><c> you</c>

00:09:31.060 --> 00:09:31.070 align:start position:0%
communicate better with investors you
 

00:09:31.070 --> 00:09:32.520 align:start position:0%
communicate better with investors you
can<00:09:31.220><c> actually</c><00:09:31.700><c> share</c><00:09:31.970><c> more</c><00:09:32.210><c> information</c>

00:09:32.520 --> 00:09:32.530 align:start position:0%
can actually share more information
 

00:09:32.530 --> 00:09:35.500 align:start position:0%
can actually share more information
without<00:09:33.530><c> revealing</c><00:09:33.800><c> the</c><00:09:34.040><c> details</c><00:09:34.360><c> you</c><00:09:35.360><c> could</c>

00:09:35.500 --> 00:09:35.510 align:start position:0%
without revealing the details you could
 

00:09:35.510 --> 00:09:37.090 align:start position:0%
without revealing the details you could
provide<00:09:35.810><c> on</c><00:09:36.110><c> the</c><00:09:36.140><c> code</c><00:09:36.380><c> to</c><00:09:36.440><c> be</c><00:09:36.560><c> probe</c><00:09:36.800><c> all</c><00:09:36.950><c> of</c>

00:09:37.090 --> 00:09:37.100 align:start position:0%
provide on the code to be probe all of
 

00:09:37.100 --> 00:09:38.860 align:start position:0%
provide on the code to be probe all of
the<00:09:37.160><c> funds</c><00:09:37.400><c> current</c><00:09:37.790><c> asset</c><00:09:38.090><c> Holdings</c><00:09:38.390><c> using</c><00:09:38.810><c> a</c>

00:09:38.860 --> 00:09:38.870 align:start position:0%
the funds current asset Holdings using a
 

00:09:38.870 --> 00:09:40.600 align:start position:0%
the funds current asset Holdings using a
public<00:09:39.050><c> database</c><00:09:39.380><c> of</c><00:09:39.770><c> assets</c><00:09:40.220><c> and</c><00:09:40.370><c> liquidity</c>

00:09:40.600 --> 00:09:40.610 align:start position:0%
public database of assets and liquidity
 

00:09:40.610 --> 00:09:42.820 align:start position:0%
public database of assets and liquidity
profiles<00:09:41.240><c> you</c><00:09:42.020><c> can</c><00:09:42.140><c> share</c><00:09:42.350><c> general</c>

00:09:42.820 --> 00:09:42.830 align:start position:0%
profiles you can share general
 

00:09:42.830 --> 00:09:44.710 align:start position:0%
profiles you can share general
information<00:09:43.490><c> about</c><00:09:43.550><c> a</c><00:09:43.700><c> funds</c><00:09:43.970><c> asset</c><00:09:44.180><c> without</c>

00:09:44.710 --> 00:09:44.720 align:start position:0%
information about a funds asset without
 

00:09:44.720 --> 00:09:46.600 align:start position:0%
information about a funds asset without
disclosing<00:09:45.140><c> which</c><00:09:45.620><c> assets</c><00:09:46.220><c> are</c><00:09:46.340><c> actually</c>

00:09:46.600 --> 00:09:46.610 align:start position:0%
disclosing which assets are actually
 

00:09:46.610 --> 00:09:48.190 align:start position:0%
disclosing which assets are actually
held<00:09:46.820><c> or</c><00:09:47.390><c> you</c><00:09:47.570><c> could</c><00:09:47.690><c> do</c><00:09:47.780><c> something</c><00:09:47.960><c> like</c><00:09:48.170><c> a</c>

00:09:48.190 --> 00:09:48.200 align:start position:0%
held or you could do something like a
 

00:09:48.200 --> 00:09:50.380 align:start position:0%
held or you could do something like a
proof<00:09:48.500><c> of</c><00:09:48.620><c> solvency</c><00:09:49.160><c> where</c><00:09:49.970><c> you</c><00:09:50.060><c> can</c><00:09:50.210><c> actually</c>

00:09:50.380 --> 00:09:50.390 align:start position:0%
proof of solvency where you can actually
 

00:09:50.390 --> 00:09:52.480 align:start position:0%
proof of solvency where you can actually
demonstrate<00:09:50.720><c> the</c><00:09:51.470><c> value</c><00:09:51.620><c> of</c><00:09:51.920><c> asset</c><00:09:52.280><c> backs</c>

00:09:52.480 --> 00:09:52.490 align:start position:0%
demonstrate the value of asset backs
 

00:09:52.490 --> 00:09:56.920 align:start position:0%
demonstrate the value of asset backs
back<00:09:52.940><c> tokens</c><00:09:55.060><c> the</c><00:09:56.060><c> value</c><00:09:56.450><c> of</c><00:09:56.510><c> the</c><00:09:56.600><c> tokens</c>

00:09:56.920 --> 00:09:56.930 align:start position:0%
back tokens the value of the tokens
 

00:09:56.930 --> 00:09:58.660 align:start position:0%
back tokens the value of the tokens
actually<00:09:57.290><c> exceed</c><00:09:57.620><c> the</c><00:09:57.740><c> liabilities</c><00:09:58.310><c> meaning</c>

00:09:58.660 --> 00:09:58.670 align:start position:0%
actually exceed the liabilities meaning
 

00:09:58.670 --> 00:10:01.300 align:start position:0%
actually exceed the liabilities meaning
like<00:09:58.850><c> the</c><00:09:59.660><c> fund</c><00:09:59.960><c> is</c><00:10:00.110><c> solvent</c><00:10:00.290><c> it</c><00:10:00.740><c> actually</c><00:10:01.100><c> has</c>

00:10:01.300 --> 00:10:01.310 align:start position:0%
like the fund is solvent it actually has
 

00:10:01.310 --> 00:10:02.950 align:start position:0%
like the fund is solvent it actually has
the<00:10:01.520><c> funds</c><00:10:01.730><c> it</c><00:10:01.940><c> says</c><00:10:02.180><c> and</c><00:10:02.570><c> you</c><00:10:02.720><c> can</c><00:10:02.840><c> actually</c>

00:10:02.950 --> 00:10:02.960 align:start position:0%
the funds it says and you can actually
 

00:10:02.960 --> 00:10:04.870 align:start position:0%
the funds it says and you can actually
do<00:10:03.230><c> that</c><00:10:03.350><c> without</c><00:10:03.500><c> revealing</c><00:10:03.830><c> how</c><00:10:04.130><c> much</c><00:10:04.340><c> or</c>

00:10:04.870 --> 00:10:04.880 align:start position:0%
do that without revealing how much or
 

00:10:04.880 --> 00:10:08.050 align:start position:0%
do that without revealing how much or
what<00:10:04.910><c> they</c><00:10:05.120><c> are</c><00:10:05.950><c> and</c><00:10:06.950><c> this</c><00:10:07.550><c> is</c><00:10:07.670><c> a</c><00:10:07.760><c> really</c>

00:10:08.050 --> 00:10:08.060 align:start position:0%
what they are and this is a really
 

00:10:08.060 --> 00:10:10.570 align:start position:0%
what they are and this is a really
exciting<00:10:08.330><c> example</c><00:10:08.900><c> which</c><00:10:08.990><c> is</c><00:10:09.310><c> it</c><00:10:10.310><c> actually</c>

00:10:10.570 --> 00:10:10.580 align:start position:0%
exciting example which is it actually
 

00:10:10.580 --> 00:10:12.940 align:start position:0%
exciting example which is it actually
uses<00:10:10.700><c> your</c><00:10:11.000><c> knowledge</c><00:10:11.270><c> of</c><00:10:11.300><c> proof</c><00:10:11.600><c> to</c><00:10:11.950><c> issue</c>

00:10:12.940 --> 00:10:12.950 align:start position:0%
uses your knowledge of proof to issue
 

00:10:12.950 --> 00:10:14.530 align:start position:0%
uses your knowledge of proof to issue
stocks<00:10:13.400><c> them</c><00:10:13.550><c> a</c><00:10:13.610><c> ledger</c><00:10:13.820><c> and</c><00:10:14.270><c> you</c><00:10:14.420><c> can</c>

00:10:14.530 --> 00:10:14.540 align:start position:0%
stocks them a ledger and you can
 

00:10:14.540 --> 00:10:16.120 align:start position:0%
stocks them a ledger and you can
actually<00:10:14.690><c> track</c><00:10:15.050><c> these</c><00:10:15.290><c> through</c><00:10:15.620><c> secondary</c>

00:10:16.120 --> 00:10:16.130 align:start position:0%
actually track these through secondary
 

00:10:16.130 --> 00:10:19.000 align:start position:0%
actually track these through secondary
trades<00:10:17.140><c> except</c><00:10:18.140><c> to</c><00:10:18.230><c> the</c><00:10:18.320><c> outside</c><00:10:18.770><c> no</c><00:10:18.980><c> one</c>

00:10:19.000 --> 00:10:19.010 align:start position:0%
trades except to the outside no one
 

00:10:19.010 --> 00:10:20.620 align:start position:0%
trades except to the outside no one
would<00:10:19.280><c> necessarily</c><00:10:19.460><c> know</c><00:10:20.000><c> that</c><00:10:20.240><c> you</c><00:10:20.390><c> are</c>

00:10:20.620 --> 00:10:20.630 align:start position:0%
would necessarily know that you are
 

00:10:20.630 --> 00:10:22.150 align:start position:0%
would necessarily know that you are
tracking<00:10:20.900><c> them</c><00:10:21.170><c> you</c><00:10:21.410><c> could</c><00:10:21.620><c> to</c><00:10:21.710><c> see</c><00:10:21.860><c> where</c>

00:10:22.150 --> 00:10:22.160 align:start position:0%
tracking them you could to see where
 

00:10:22.160 --> 00:10:24.430 align:start position:0%
tracking them you could to see where
they're<00:10:22.370><c> going</c><00:10:22.730><c> but</c><00:10:22.940><c> outwardly</c><00:10:23.150><c> like</c><00:10:23.780><c> no</c><00:10:24.290><c> one</c>

00:10:24.430 --> 00:10:24.440 align:start position:0%
they're going but outwardly like no one
 

00:10:24.440 --> 00:10:25.840 align:start position:0%
they're going but outwardly like no one
else<00:10:24.590><c> could</c><00:10:24.830><c> see</c><00:10:25.070><c> where</c><00:10:25.310><c> they're</c><00:10:25.490><c> going</c><00:10:25.640><c> it</c>

00:10:25.840 --> 00:10:25.850 align:start position:0%
else could see where they're going it
 

00:10:25.850 --> 00:10:26.950 align:start position:0%
else could see where they're going it
wouldn't<00:10:26.030><c> be</c><00:10:26.090><c> able</c><00:10:26.150><c> to</c><00:10:26.300><c> track</c><00:10:26.480><c> them</c><00:10:26.660><c> only</c>

00:10:26.950 --> 00:10:26.960 align:start position:0%
wouldn't be able to track them only
 

00:10:26.960 --> 00:10:28.510 align:start position:0%
wouldn't be able to track them only
you'd<00:10:27.140><c> be</c><00:10:27.290><c> able</c><00:10:27.410><c> to</c><00:10:27.560><c> track</c><00:10:27.740><c> them</c><00:10:27.950><c> and</c><00:10:28.280><c> you</c><00:10:28.400><c> can</c>

00:10:28.510 --> 00:10:28.520 align:start position:0%
you'd be able to track them and you can
 

00:10:28.520 --> 00:10:29.890 align:start position:0%
you'd be able to track them and you can
actually<00:10:28.760><c> do</c><00:10:28.880><c> that</c><00:10:29.060><c> using</c><00:10:29.480><c> certain</c><00:10:29.720><c> altar</c>

00:10:29.890 --> 00:10:29.900 align:start position:0%
actually do that using certain altar
 

00:10:29.900 --> 00:10:33.340 align:start position:0%
actually do that using certain altar
prints<00:10:30.080><c> as</c><00:10:30.200><c> well</c><00:10:31.330><c> so</c><00:10:32.330><c> some</c><00:10:32.510><c> other</c><00:10:32.690><c> use</c><00:10:33.050><c> cases</c>

00:10:33.340 --> 00:10:33.350 align:start position:0%
prints as well so some other use cases
 

00:10:33.350 --> 00:10:35.290 align:start position:0%
prints as well so some other use cases
that<00:10:33.680><c> I</c><00:10:33.740><c> kind</c><00:10:33.920><c> of</c><00:10:33.950><c> mentioned</c><00:10:34.430><c> quickly</c><00:10:34.940><c> before</c>

00:10:35.290 --> 00:10:35.300 align:start position:0%
that I kind of mentioned quickly before
 

00:10:35.300 --> 00:10:38.140 align:start position:0%
that I kind of mentioned quickly before
and<00:10:35.600><c> like</c><00:10:36.230><c> in</c><00:10:36.530><c> general</c><00:10:36.800><c> this</c><00:10:37.190><c> talk</c><00:10:37.490><c> is</c><00:10:37.790><c> very</c>

00:10:38.140 --> 00:10:38.150 align:start position:0%
and like in general this talk is very
 

00:10:38.150 --> 00:10:40.840 align:start position:0%
and like in general this talk is very
much<00:10:38.390><c> trying</c><00:10:39.200><c> to</c><00:10:39.410><c> find</c><00:10:39.770><c> ways</c><00:10:40.100><c> trusts</c><00:10:40.520><c> to</c><00:10:40.640><c> think</c>

00:10:40.840 --> 00:10:40.850 align:start position:0%
much trying to find ways trusts to think
 

00:10:40.850 --> 00:10:42.700 align:start position:0%
much trying to find ways trusts to think
about<00:10:41.090><c> the</c><00:10:41.240><c> power</c><00:10:41.420><c> of</c><00:10:41.600><c> zernoff</c><00:10:42.020><c> proofs</c><00:10:42.380><c> and</c><00:10:42.650><c> I</c>

00:10:42.700 --> 00:10:42.710 align:start position:0%
about the power of zernoff proofs and I
 

00:10:42.710 --> 00:10:44.920 align:start position:0%
about the power of zernoff proofs and I
hope<00:10:43.010><c> that</c><00:10:43.850><c> this</c><00:10:44.000><c> actually</c><00:10:44.360><c> could</c><00:10:44.510><c> inspire</c>

00:10:44.920 --> 00:10:44.930 align:start position:0%
hope that this actually could inspire
 

00:10:44.930 --> 00:10:47.290 align:start position:0%
hope that this actually could inspire
you<00:10:45.170><c> to</c><00:10:45.320><c> think</c><00:10:45.560><c> about</c><00:10:45.860><c> more</c><00:10:46.100><c> ideas</c><00:10:46.730><c> and</c><00:10:47.000><c> so</c>

00:10:47.290 --> 00:10:47.300 align:start position:0%
you to think about more ideas and so
 

00:10:47.300 --> 00:10:48.670 align:start position:0%
you to think about more ideas and so
other<00:10:47.450><c> ideas</c><00:10:47.810><c> that</c><00:10:47.900><c> have</c><00:10:47.990><c> been</c><00:10:48.020><c> floated</c><00:10:48.530><c> or</c>

00:10:48.670 --> 00:10:48.680 align:start position:0%
other ideas that have been floated or
 

00:10:48.680 --> 00:10:50.860 align:start position:0%
other ideas that have been floated or
things<00:10:48.890><c> like</c><00:10:48.980><c> taxes</c><00:10:49.520><c> and</c><00:10:49.550><c> auditing</c><00:10:50.030><c> supply</c>

00:10:50.860 --> 00:10:50.870 align:start position:0%
things like taxes and auditing supply
 

00:10:50.870 --> 00:10:52.720 align:start position:0%
things like taxes and auditing supply
chain<00:10:51.080><c> management</c><00:10:51.410><c> and</c><00:10:51.710><c> voting</c><00:10:52.040><c> there</c><00:10:52.550><c> is</c><00:10:52.700><c> a</c>

00:10:52.720 --> 00:10:52.730 align:start position:0%
chain management and voting there is a
 

00:10:52.730 --> 00:10:55.270 align:start position:0%
chain management and voting there is a
project<00:10:53.030><c> called</c><00:10:53.270><c> ZK</c><00:10:53.810><c> ledger</c><00:10:54.080><c> from</c><00:10:54.410><c> MIT</c><00:10:54.770><c> where</c>

00:10:55.270 --> 00:10:55.280 align:start position:0%
project called ZK ledger from MIT where
 

00:10:55.280 --> 00:10:56.830 align:start position:0%
project called ZK ledger from MIT where
they<00:10:55.460><c> did</c><00:10:55.640><c> a</c><00:10:55.670><c> lot</c><00:10:55.850><c> of</c><00:10:56.000><c> work</c><00:10:56.150><c> on</c><00:10:56.300><c> the</c><00:10:56.420><c> auditing</c>

00:10:56.830 --> 00:10:56.840 align:start position:0%
they did a lot of work on the auditing
 

00:10:56.840 --> 00:10:58.390 align:start position:0%
they did a lot of work on the auditing
front<00:10:57.110><c> as</c><00:10:57.650><c> far</c><00:10:57.860><c> as</c><00:10:57.920><c> I</c><00:10:58.010><c> know</c><00:10:58.130><c> there's</c><00:10:58.340><c> no</c>

00:10:58.390 --> 00:10:58.400 align:start position:0%
front as far as I know there's no
 

00:10:58.400 --> 00:11:00.460 align:start position:0%
front as far as I know there's no
implementations<00:10:59.180><c> yet</c><00:10:59.390><c> and</c><00:10:59.600><c> in</c><00:10:59.930><c> general</c><00:11:00.350><c> a</c><00:11:00.440><c> lot</c>

00:11:00.460 --> 00:11:00.470 align:start position:0%
implementations yet and in general a lot
 

00:11:00.470 --> 00:11:02.650 align:start position:0%
implementations yet and in general a lot
of<00:11:00.710><c> this</c><00:11:00.830><c> stuff</c><00:11:01.010><c> will</c><00:11:01.250><c> need</c><00:11:01.490><c> like</c><00:11:01.790><c> I</c><00:11:02.180><c> mean</c>

00:11:02.650 --> 00:11:02.660 align:start position:0%
of this stuff will need like I mean
 

00:11:02.660 --> 00:11:04.090 align:start position:0%
of this stuff will need like I mean
you'll<00:11:02.780><c> have</c><00:11:02.810><c> to</c><00:11:03.050><c> get</c><00:11:03.170><c> a</c><00:11:03.200><c> lot</c><00:11:03.410><c> of</c><00:11:03.440><c> authorities</c>

00:11:04.090 --> 00:11:04.100 align:start position:0%
you'll have to get a lot of authorities
 

00:11:04.100 --> 00:11:06.340 align:start position:0%
you'll have to get a lot of authorities
and<00:11:04.250><c> regulators</c><00:11:04.700><c> on</c><00:11:04.850><c> word</c><00:11:05.090><c> I</c><00:11:05.330><c> sort</c><00:11:05.990><c> of</c><00:11:06.050><c> picture</c>

00:11:06.340 --> 00:11:06.350 align:start position:0%
and regulators on word I sort of picture
 

00:11:06.350 --> 00:11:08.800 align:start position:0%
and regulators on word I sort of picture
it<00:11:06.470><c> being</c><00:11:06.680><c> a</c><00:11:06.770><c> combined</c><00:11:07.610><c> effort</c><00:11:07.880><c> between</c><00:11:08.300><c> funds</c>

00:11:08.800 --> 00:11:08.810 align:start position:0%
it being a combined effort between funds
 

00:11:08.810 --> 00:11:10.630 align:start position:0%
it being a combined effort between funds
and<00:11:09.170><c> regulators</c><00:11:09.800><c> I</c><00:11:10.040><c> don't</c><00:11:10.250><c> think</c><00:11:10.460><c> it</c><00:11:10.550><c> would</c>

00:11:10.630 --> 00:11:10.640 align:start position:0%
and regulators I don't think it would
 

00:11:10.640 --> 00:11:13.480 align:start position:0%
and regulators I don't think it would
just<00:11:10.790><c> come</c><00:11:11.120><c> from</c><00:11:11.390><c> industry</c><00:11:11.960><c> if</c><00:11:12.950><c> that</c><00:11:13.190><c> was</c>

00:11:13.480 --> 00:11:13.490 align:start position:0%
just come from industry if that was
 

00:11:13.490 --> 00:11:14.590 align:start position:0%
just come from industry if that was
happen<00:11:13.760><c> but</c><00:11:13.940><c> I</c><00:11:13.970><c> think</c><00:11:14.209><c> it</c><00:11:14.300><c> could</c><00:11:14.420><c> be</c><00:11:14.480><c> really</c>

00:11:14.590 --> 00:11:14.600 align:start position:0%
happen but I think it could be really
 

00:11:14.600 --> 00:11:18.790 align:start position:0%
happen but I think it could be really
powerful<00:11:16.060><c> cool</c><00:11:17.060><c> so</c><00:11:17.779><c> yeah</c><00:11:17.930><c> I</c><00:11:18.110><c> hope</c><00:11:18.440><c> that</c><00:11:18.500><c> this</c>

00:11:18.790 --> 00:11:18.800 align:start position:0%
powerful cool so yeah I hope that this
 

00:11:18.800 --> 00:11:20.650 align:start position:0%
powerful cool so yeah I hope that this
talk<00:11:19.070><c> has</c><00:11:19.220><c> helped</c><00:11:19.520><c> you</c><00:11:19.610><c> to</c><00:11:19.730><c> explain</c><00:11:20.060><c> I</c><00:11:20.360><c> hope</c>

00:11:20.650 --> 00:11:20.660 align:start position:0%
talk has helped you to explain I hope
 

00:11:20.660 --> 00:11:22.030 align:start position:0%
talk has helped you to explain I hope
that<00:11:20.870><c> I've</c><00:11:20.990><c> explained</c><00:11:21.410><c> a</c><00:11:21.529><c> little</c><00:11:21.620><c> bit</c><00:11:21.770><c> how</c>

00:11:22.030 --> 00:11:22.040 align:start position:0%
that I've explained a little bit how
 

00:11:22.040 --> 00:11:23.800 align:start position:0%
that I've explained a little bit how
valuable<00:11:22.370><c> your</c><00:11:23.000><c> knowledge</c><00:11:23.270><c> proofs</c><00:11:23.510><c> could</c><00:11:23.690><c> be</c>

00:11:23.800 --> 00:11:23.810 align:start position:0%
valuable your knowledge proofs could be
 

00:11:23.810 --> 00:11:25.690 align:start position:0%
valuable your knowledge proofs could be
for<00:11:24.140><c> our</c><00:11:24.230><c> personal</c><00:11:25.040><c> and</c><00:11:25.130><c> professional</c><00:11:25.220><c> lives</c>

00:11:25.690 --> 00:11:25.700 align:start position:0%
for our personal and professional lives
 

00:11:25.700 --> 00:11:28.690 align:start position:0%
for our personal and professional lives
and<00:11:26.500><c> yeah</c><00:11:27.500><c> and</c><00:11:27.770><c> how</c><00:11:27.950><c> it</c><00:11:28.100><c> provides</c><00:11:28.490><c> this</c>

00:11:28.690 --> 00:11:28.700 align:start position:0%
and yeah and how it provides this
 

00:11:28.700 --> 00:11:30.610 align:start position:0%
and yeah and how it provides this
much-needed<00:11:29.029><c> balance</c><00:11:29.690><c> between</c><00:11:29.870><c> privacy</c><00:11:30.260><c> and</c>

00:11:30.610 --> 00:11:30.620 align:start position:0%
much-needed balance between privacy and
 

00:11:30.620 --> 00:11:33.610 align:start position:0%
much-needed balance between privacy and
transparency<00:11:31.060><c> and</c><00:11:32.060><c> before</c><00:11:32.959><c> I</c><00:11:32.990><c> end</c><00:11:33.260><c> I</c><00:11:33.410><c> want</c><00:11:33.589><c> to</c>

00:11:33.610 --> 00:11:33.620 align:start position:0%
transparency and before I end I want to
 

00:11:33.620 --> 00:11:35.829 align:start position:0%
transparency and before I end I want to
say<00:11:33.680><c> a</c><00:11:33.800><c> big</c><00:11:34.010><c> thank</c><00:11:34.250><c> you</c><00:11:34.279><c> to</c><00:11:34.370><c> that</c><00:11:35.180><c> fish</c><00:11:35.390><c> as</c><00:11:35.660><c> I</c>

00:11:35.829 --> 00:11:35.839 align:start position:0%
say a big thank you to that fish as I
 

00:11:35.839 --> 00:11:37.750 align:start position:0%
say a big thank you to that fish as I
mentioned<00:11:36.200><c> from</c><00:11:36.800><c> Fedora</c><00:11:37.160><c> because</c><00:11:37.430><c> you</c><00:11:37.520><c> really</c>

00:11:37.750 --> 00:11:37.760 align:start position:0%
mentioned from Fedora because you really
 

00:11:37.760 --> 00:11:39.670 align:start position:0%
mentioned from Fedora because you really
helped<00:11:38.000><c> me</c><00:11:38.029><c> work</c><00:11:38.660><c> on</c><00:11:38.810><c> this</c><00:11:38.930><c> talk</c><00:11:39.170><c> and</c><00:11:39.380><c> come</c><00:11:39.529><c> up</c>

00:11:39.670 --> 00:11:39.680 align:start position:0%
helped me work on this talk and come up
 

00:11:39.680 --> 00:11:41.860 align:start position:0%
helped me work on this talk and come up
with<00:11:39.800><c> those</c><00:11:39.980><c> points</c><00:11:40.459><c> I</c><00:11:40.640><c> think</c><00:11:41.180><c> their</c><00:11:41.480><c> projects</c>

00:11:41.860 --> 00:11:41.870 align:start position:0%
with those points I think their projects
 

00:11:41.870 --> 00:11:43.449 align:start position:0%
with those points I think their projects
pretty<00:11:42.050><c> cool</c><00:11:42.260><c> I</c><00:11:42.500><c> don't</c><00:11:42.830><c> work</c><00:11:42.950><c> for</c><00:11:42.980><c> them</c><00:11:43.220><c> but</c><00:11:43.399><c> I</c>

00:11:43.449 --> 00:11:43.459 align:start position:0%
pretty cool I don't work for them but I
 

00:11:43.459 --> 00:11:46.210 align:start position:0%
pretty cool I don't work for them but I
just<00:11:43.580><c> I</c><00:11:43.850><c> think</c><00:11:44.180><c> they</c><00:11:44.450><c> inspired</c><00:11:44.810><c> us</c><00:11:45.020><c> so</c><00:11:45.260><c> I</c><00:11:45.529><c> wanna</c>

00:11:46.210 --> 00:11:46.220 align:start position:0%
just I think they inspired us so I wanna
 

00:11:46.220 --> 00:11:54.880 align:start position:0%
just I think they inspired us so I wanna
say<00:11:46.399><c> thank</c><00:11:46.610><c> you</c><00:11:46.700><c> to</c><00:11:46.820><c> them</c><00:11:53.529><c> this</c><00:11:54.529><c> is</c><00:11:54.589><c> a</c><00:11:54.800><c> very</c>

00:11:54.880 --> 00:11:54.890 align:start position:0%
say thank you to them this is a very
 

00:11:54.890 --> 00:11:56.920 align:start position:0%
say thank you to them this is a very
high-level<00:11:55.430><c> talk</c><00:11:55.910><c> the</c><00:11:56.540><c> zero</c><00:11:56.779><c> knowledge</c>

00:11:56.920 --> 00:11:56.930 align:start position:0%
high-level talk the zero knowledge
 

00:11:56.930 --> 00:11:58.389 align:start position:0%
high-level talk the zero knowledge
summit<00:11:57.380><c> is</c><00:11:57.529><c> something</c><00:11:57.860><c> that</c><00:11:57.950><c> I'm</c><00:11:58.040><c> thrown</c><00:11:58.279><c> in</c>

00:11:58.389 --> 00:11:58.399 align:start position:0%
summit is something that I'm thrown in
 

00:11:58.399 --> 00:11:59.800 align:start position:0%
summit is something that I'm thrown in
San<00:11:58.580><c> Francisco</c><00:11:59.000><c> at</c><00:11:59.300><c> the</c><00:11:59.450><c> end</c><00:11:59.570><c> of</c><00:11:59.660><c> month</c>

00:11:59.800 --> 00:11:59.810 align:start position:0%
San Francisco at the end of month
 

00:11:59.810 --> 00:12:02.139 align:start position:0%
San Francisco at the end of month
October<00:12:00.470><c> 26</c><00:12:00.890><c> if</c><00:12:01.160><c> you're</c><00:12:01.339><c> into</c><00:12:01.700><c> that</c><00:12:01.790><c> if</c><00:12:02.029><c> you're</c>

00:12:02.139 --> 00:12:02.149 align:start position:0%
October 26 if you're into that if you're
 

00:12:02.149 --> 00:12:04.329 align:start position:0%
October 26 if you're into that if you're
there<00:12:02.420><c> please</c><00:12:02.810><c> apply</c><00:12:03.200><c> that</c><00:12:03.860><c> will</c><00:12:04.130><c> have</c>

00:12:04.329 --> 00:12:04.339 align:start position:0%
there please apply that will have
 

00:12:04.339 --> 00:12:05.650 align:start position:0%
there please apply that will have
actually<00:12:04.670><c> some</c><00:12:04.850><c> of</c><00:12:04.880><c> the</c><00:12:05.000><c> best</c><00:12:05.089><c> researchers</c>

00:12:05.650 --> 00:12:05.660 align:start position:0%
actually some of the best researchers
 

00:12:05.660 --> 00:12:08.530 align:start position:0%
actually some of the best researchers
around<00:12:06.100><c> talking</c><00:12:07.100><c> about</c><00:12:07.339><c> details</c><00:12:08.029><c> of</c><00:12:08.360><c> their</c>

00:12:08.530 --> 00:12:08.540 align:start position:0%
around talking about details of their
 

00:12:08.540 --> 00:12:10.329 align:start position:0%
around talking about details of their
protocols<00:12:09.050><c> and</c><00:12:09.380><c> so</c><00:12:09.620><c> I</c><00:12:09.649><c> hope</c><00:12:09.920><c> that</c><00:12:09.950><c> you</c><00:12:10.220><c> will</c>

00:12:10.329 --> 00:12:10.339 align:start position:0%
protocols and so I hope that you will
 

00:12:10.339 --> 00:12:13.840 align:start position:0%
protocols and so I hope that you will
consider<00:12:10.550><c> coming</c><00:12:12.220><c> so</c><00:12:13.220><c> I</c><00:12:13.250><c> don't</c><00:12:13.640><c> know</c><00:12:13.700><c> if</c><00:12:13.760><c> you</c>

00:12:13.840 --> 00:12:13.850 align:start position:0%
consider coming so I don't know if you
 

00:12:13.850 --> 00:12:15.850 align:start position:0%
consider coming so I don't know if you
have<00:12:13.970><c> any</c><00:12:14.089><c> questions</c><00:12:14.540><c> or</c><00:12:15.380><c> if</c><00:12:15.589><c> you</c><00:12:15.680><c> actually</c>

00:12:15.850 --> 00:12:15.860 align:start position:0%
have any questions or if you actually
 

00:12:15.860 --> 00:12:17.800 align:start position:0%
have any questions or if you actually
give<00:12:16.190><c> any</c><00:12:16.370><c> comments</c><00:12:16.880><c> given</c><00:12:17.209><c> me</c><00:12:17.300><c> and</c><00:12:17.420><c> ideas</c>

00:12:17.800 --> 00:12:17.810 align:start position:0%
give any comments given me and ideas
 

00:12:17.810 --> 00:12:19.470 align:start position:0%
give any comments given me and ideas
that<00:12:18.110><c> would</c><00:12:18.170><c> be</c><00:12:18.290><c> really</c><00:12:18.529><c> interesting</c><00:12:18.920><c> to</c><00:12:19.040><c> hear</c>

00:12:19.470 --> 00:12:19.480 align:start position:0%
that would be really interesting to hear
 

00:12:19.480 --> 00:12:22.280 align:start position:0%
that would be really interesting to hear
also<00:12:20.480><c> I</c><00:12:20.510><c> think</c><00:12:20.600><c> there's</c><00:12:20.870><c> only</c><00:12:20.990><c> one</c>

00:12:22.280 --> 00:12:22.290 align:start position:0%
also I think there's only one
 

00:12:22.290 --> 00:12:29.500 align:start position:0%
also I think there's only one
so

00:12:29.500 --> 00:12:29.510 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:12:29.510 --> 00:12:32.690 align:start position:0%
 
you<00:12:30.510><c> get</c><00:12:30.720><c> lakhs</c><00:12:31.230><c> welcome</c><00:12:32.070><c> two</c><00:12:32.190><c> men</c><00:12:32.340><c> to</c><00:12:32.460><c> do</c><00:12:32.580><c> this</c>

00:12:32.690 --> 00:12:32.700 align:start position:0%
you get lakhs welcome two men to do this
 

00:12:32.700 --> 00:12:42.210 align:start position:0%
you get lakhs welcome two men to do this
you<00:12:32.820><c> know</c>

00:12:42.210 --> 00:12:42.220 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:12:42.220 --> 00:12:47.110 align:start position:0%
 
inside<00:12:43.220><c> these</c><00:12:43.370><c> 18</c><00:12:43.640><c> digital</c><00:12:44.060><c> machines</c><00:12:44.710><c> so</c><00:12:46.120><c> well</c>

00:12:47.110 --> 00:12:47.120 align:start position:0%
inside these 18 digital machines so well
 

00:12:47.120 --> 00:12:48.520 align:start position:0%
inside these 18 digital machines so well
I<00:12:47.150><c> know</c><00:12:47.210><c> that</c><00:12:47.390><c> there's</c><00:12:47.690><c> a</c><00:12:47.780><c> lot</c><00:12:47.930><c> of</c><00:12:47.990><c> projects</c>

00:12:48.520 --> 00:12:48.530 align:start position:0%
I know that there's a lot of projects
 

00:12:48.530 --> 00:12:50.860 align:start position:0%
I know that there's a lot of projects
that<00:12:48.620><c> are</c><00:12:48.680><c> building</c><00:12:49.100><c> on</c><00:12:49.280><c> top</c><00:12:49.520><c> of</c><00:12:49.580><c> the</c><00:12:50.570><c> air</c>

00:12:50.860 --> 00:12:50.870 align:start position:0%
that are building on top of the air
 

00:12:50.870 --> 00:12:52.240 align:start position:0%
that are building on top of the air
virtual<00:12:51.260><c> machine</c><00:12:51.500><c> using</c><00:12:51.890><c> zero</c><00:12:52.100><c> knowledge</c>

00:12:52.240 --> 00:12:52.250 align:start position:0%
virtual machine using zero knowledge
 

00:12:52.250 --> 00:12:55.240 align:start position:0%
virtual machine using zero knowledge
proof<00:12:52.810><c> stuff</c><00:12:53.810><c> and</c><00:12:54.380><c> I'm</c><00:12:54.560><c> sure</c><00:12:54.740><c> you</c><00:12:54.890><c> could</c><00:12:55.070><c> do</c>

00:12:55.240 --> 00:12:55.250 align:start position:0%
proof stuff and I'm sure you could do
 

00:12:55.250 --> 00:12:57.280 align:start position:0%
proof stuff and I'm sure you could do
private<00:12:55.790><c> transactions</c><00:12:56.390><c> with</c><00:12:56.600><c> them</c><00:12:56.810><c> but</c><00:12:57.260><c> I</c>

00:12:57.280 --> 00:12:57.290 align:start position:0%
private transactions with them but I
 

00:12:57.290 --> 00:12:58.450 align:start position:0%
private transactions with them but I
think<00:12:57.380><c> what</c><00:12:57.680><c> we're</c><00:12:57.830><c> talking</c><00:12:58.130><c> about</c><00:12:58.160><c> here</c><00:12:58.400><c> is</c>

00:12:58.450 --> 00:12:58.460 align:start position:0%
think what we're talking about here is
 

00:12:58.460 --> 00:13:00.670 align:start position:0%
think what we're talking about here is
actually<00:12:58.730><c> its</c><00:12:59.270><c> constructions</c><00:13:00.170><c> using</c><00:13:00.620><c> this</c>

00:13:00.670 --> 00:13:00.680 align:start position:0%
actually its constructions using this
 

00:13:00.680 --> 00:13:01.900 align:start position:0%
actually its constructions using this
you're<00:13:00.800><c> an</c><00:13:00.920><c> entrepreneur</c><00:13:01.370><c> and</c><00:13:01.550><c> as</c><00:13:01.790><c> I</c>

00:13:01.900 --> 00:13:01.910 align:start position:0%
you're an entrepreneur and as I
 

00:13:01.910 --> 00:13:04.060 align:start position:0%
you're an entrepreneur and as I
mentioned<00:13:02.210><c> also</c><00:13:02.330><c> NPCs</c><00:13:02.990><c> it</c><00:13:03.710><c> sounds</c><00:13:03.950><c> like</c>

00:13:04.060 --> 00:13:04.070 align:start position:0%
mentioned also NPCs it sounds like
 

00:13:04.070 --> 00:13:06.670 align:start position:0%
mentioned also NPCs it sounds like
you've<00:13:04.790><c> actually</c><00:13:05.060><c> designed</c><00:13:05.660><c> systems</c><00:13:06.290><c> that</c>

00:13:06.670 --> 00:13:06.680 align:start position:0%
you've actually designed systems that
 

00:13:06.680 --> 00:13:53.460 align:start position:0%
you've actually designed systems that
allow<00:13:06.890><c> for</c><00:13:06.950><c> the</c><00:13:07.280><c> disclosure</c><00:13:11.350><c> right</c><00:13:12.350><c> now</c><00:13:23.290><c> using</c>

00:13:53.460 --> 00:13:53.470 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:13:53.470 --> 00:13:57.130 align:start position:0%
 
this<00:13:54.470><c> ability</c><00:13:55.250><c> over</c><00:13:55.850><c> a</c><00:13:56.180><c> blank</c><00:13:56.570><c> there's</c><00:13:56.930><c> no</c>

00:13:57.130 --> 00:13:57.140 align:start position:0%
this ability over a blank there's no
 

00:13:57.140 --> 00:14:00.130 align:start position:0%
this ability over a blank there's no
logic<00:13:57.470><c> rules</c><00:13:57.589><c> for</c><00:13:57.920><c> the</c><00:13:58.160><c> Texas</c><00:13:58.640><c> and</c><00:13:59.240><c> I</c><00:13:59.720><c> would</c>

00:14:00.130 --> 00:14:00.140 align:start position:0%
logic rules for the Texas and I would
 

00:14:00.140 --> 00:14:04.329 align:start position:0%
logic rules for the Texas and I would
say<00:14:00.380><c> that</c><00:14:00.620><c> it</c><00:14:00.860><c> is</c><00:14:01.870><c> absolutely</c><00:14:02.870><c> a</c><00:14:03.260><c> challenge</c><00:14:03.920><c> to</c>

00:14:04.329 --> 00:14:04.339 align:start position:0%
say that it is absolutely a challenge to
 

00:14:04.339 --> 00:14:08.980 align:start position:0%
say that it is absolutely a challenge to
convince<00:14:05.260><c> eventual</c><00:14:06.260><c> ministry</c><00:14:06.800><c> to</c><00:14:07.660><c> use</c><00:14:08.660><c> of</c>

00:14:08.980 --> 00:14:08.990 align:start position:0%
convince eventual ministry to use of
 

00:14:08.990 --> 00:14:12.310 align:start position:0%
convince eventual ministry to use of
these<00:14:09.170><c> technology</c><00:14:09.950><c> it's</c><00:14:10.540><c> completely</c><00:14:11.540><c> another</c>

00:14:12.310 --> 00:14:12.320 align:start position:0%
these technology it's completely another
 

00:14:12.320 --> 00:14:15.790 align:start position:0%
these technology it's completely another
level<00:14:12.800><c> of</c><00:14:13.100><c> check</c><00:14:13.370><c> so</c><00:14:13.940><c> all</c><00:14:14.480><c> these</c><00:14:15.230><c> emulation</c>

00:14:15.790 --> 00:14:15.800 align:start position:0%
level of check so all these emulation
 

00:14:15.800 --> 00:14:18.670 align:start position:0%
level of check so all these emulation
auditory<00:14:16.370><c> understand</c><00:14:17.270><c> the</c><00:14:17.690><c> power</c><00:14:17.960><c> of</c><00:14:18.260><c> zero</c>

00:14:18.670 --> 00:14:18.680 align:start position:0%
auditory understand the power of zero
 

00:14:18.680 --> 00:14:20.800 align:start position:0%
auditory understand the power of zero
knowledge<00:14:18.920><c> proves</c><00:14:19.339><c> but</c><00:14:19.760><c> you</c><00:14:19.970><c> need</c><00:14:20.240><c> to</c><00:14:20.540><c> prove</c>

00:14:20.800 --> 00:14:20.810 align:start position:0%
knowledge proves but you need to prove
 

00:14:20.810 --> 00:14:25.540 align:start position:0%
knowledge proves but you need to prove
it<00:14:21.080><c> yes</c><00:14:21.890><c> for</c><00:14:22.160><c> the</c><00:14:22.760><c> government</c><00:14:24.130><c> that's</c><00:14:25.130><c> that's</c>

00:14:25.540 --> 00:14:25.550 align:start position:0%
it yes for the government that's that's
 

00:14:25.550 --> 00:14:27.160 align:start position:0%
it yes for the government that's that's
actually<00:14:25.670><c> one</c><00:14:25.940><c> of</c><00:14:25.970><c> the</c><00:14:26.060><c> reasons</c><00:14:26.390><c> why</c><00:14:26.510><c> I</c><00:14:26.960><c> don't</c>

00:14:27.160 --> 00:14:27.170 align:start position:0%
actually one of the reasons why I don't
 

00:14:27.170 --> 00:14:30.010 align:start position:0%
actually one of the reasons why I don't
totally<00:14:27.380><c> see</c><00:14:27.770><c> it</c><00:14:27.890><c> coming</c><00:14:28.339><c> from</c><00:14:28.640><c> industry</c><00:14:29.570><c> and</c>

00:14:30.010 --> 00:14:30.020 align:start position:0%
totally see it coming from industry and
 

00:14:30.020 --> 00:14:31.630 align:start position:0%
totally see it coming from industry and
like<00:14:30.260><c> having</c><00:14:30.560><c> industry</c><00:14:30.980><c> pitch</c><00:14:31.250><c> it</c><00:14:31.460><c> to</c>

00:14:31.630 --> 00:14:31.640 align:start position:0%
like having industry pitch it to
 

00:14:31.640 --> 00:14:34.900 align:start position:0%
like having industry pitch it to
government<00:14:32.570><c> but</c><00:14:32.990><c> rather</c><00:14:33.050><c> like</c><00:14:33.580><c> soar</c><00:14:34.580><c> through</c>

00:14:34.900 --> 00:14:34.910 align:start position:0%
government but rather like soar through
 

00:14:34.910 --> 00:14:37.630 align:start position:0%
government but rather like soar through
education<00:14:35.510><c> or</c><00:14:35.660><c> through</c><00:14:35.839><c> like</c><00:14:36.640><c> evangelizing</c>

00:14:37.630 --> 00:14:37.640 align:start position:0%
education or through like evangelizing
 

00:14:37.640 --> 00:14:39.820 align:start position:0%
education or through like evangelizing
these<00:14:37.910><c> ideas</c><00:14:38.420><c> potentially</c><00:14:39.290><c> have</c><00:14:39.470><c> people</c>

00:14:39.820 --> 00:14:39.830 align:start position:0%
these ideas potentially have people
 

00:14:39.830 --> 00:14:42.040 align:start position:0%
these ideas potentially have people
within<00:14:40.010><c> those</c><00:14:40.430><c> bodies</c><00:14:41.210><c> come</c><00:14:41.630><c> up</c><00:14:41.750><c> with</c><00:14:41.930><c> those</c>

00:14:42.040 --> 00:14:42.050 align:start position:0%
within those bodies come up with those
 

00:14:42.050 --> 00:14:44.140 align:start position:0%
within those bodies come up with those
ideas<00:14:42.200><c> themselves</c><00:14:42.580><c> which</c><00:14:43.580><c> may</c><00:14:43.760><c> be</c><00:14:43.940><c> good</c><00:14:44.120><c> or</c>

00:14:44.140 --> 00:14:44.150 align:start position:0%
ideas themselves which may be good or
 

00:14:44.150 --> 00:14:45.520 align:start position:0%
ideas themselves which may be good or
bad<00:14:44.390><c> but</c><00:14:44.630><c> I</c><00:14:44.690><c> think</c><00:14:44.750><c> it's</c><00:14:44.990><c> good</c><00:14:45.170><c> that</c><00:14:45.200><c> we</c><00:14:45.320><c> keep</c>

00:14:45.520 --> 00:14:45.530 align:start position:0%
bad but I think it's good that we keep
 

00:14:45.530 --> 00:14:47.410 align:start position:0%
bad but I think it's good that we keep
an<00:14:45.650><c> eye</c><00:14:45.770><c> on</c><00:14:45.800><c> it</c>

00:14:47.410 --> 00:14:47.420 align:start position:0%
an eye on it
 

00:14:47.420 --> 00:14:52.120 align:start position:0%
an eye on it
I<00:14:47.589><c> find</c><00:14:48.589><c> a</c><00:14:48.740><c> lot</c><00:14:48.920><c> of</c><00:14:49.550><c> that</c><00:14:50.800><c> though</c><00:14:51.800><c> there's</c><00:14:52.040><c> a</c>

00:14:52.120 --> 00:14:52.130 align:start position:0%
I find a lot of that though there's a
 

00:14:52.130 --> 00:14:54.950 align:start position:0%
I find a lot of that though there's a
motive<00:14:52.700><c> I</c><00:14:52.850><c> mean</c><00:14:53.180><c> Singapore</c>

00:14:54.950 --> 00:14:54.960 align:start position:0%
motive I mean Singapore
 

00:14:54.960 --> 00:14:59.480 align:start position:0%
motive I mean Singapore
to<00:14:55.110><c> Authority</c><00:14:55.770><c> the</c><00:14:56.010><c> launcher</c><00:14:58.100><c> kind</c><00:14:59.100><c> of</c><00:14:59.220><c> like</c><00:14:59.460><c> a</c>

00:14:59.480 --> 00:14:59.490 align:start position:0%
to Authority the launcher kind of like a
 

00:14:59.490 --> 00:15:02.030 align:start position:0%
to Authority the launcher kind of like a
-<00:14:59.880><c> notable</c><00:15:00.630><c> fortune</c><00:15:01.200><c> Plumtree</c>

00:15:02.030 --> 00:15:02.040 align:start position:0%
- notable fortune Plumtree
 

00:15:02.040 --> 00:15:06.170 align:start position:0%
- notable fortune Plumtree
and<00:15:02.940><c> one</c><00:15:03.390><c> on</c><00:15:03.600><c> through</c><00:15:03.899><c> the</c><00:15:05.180><c> implementations</c>

00:15:06.170 --> 00:15:06.180 align:start position:0%
and one on through the implementations
 

00:15:06.180 --> 00:15:09.290 align:start position:0%
and one on through the implementations
is<00:15:06.360><c> as</c><00:15:06.570><c> easy</c><00:15:06.720><c> as</c><00:15:07.050><c> proof</c><00:15:07.520><c> serious</c><00:15:08.520><c> importance</c>

00:15:09.290 --> 00:15:09.300 align:start position:0%
is as easy as proof serious importance
 

00:15:09.300 --> 00:15:19.040 align:start position:0%
is as easy as proof serious importance
with<00:15:09.480><c> much</c><00:15:09.660><c> proof</c><00:15:10.250><c> for</c><00:15:11.250><c> in</c><00:15:11.339><c> the</c><00:15:11.490><c> bank</c><00:15:11.730><c> I</c><00:15:18.050><c> mean</c>

00:15:19.040 --> 00:15:19.050 align:start position:0%
with much proof for in the bank I mean
 

00:15:19.050 --> 00:15:22.250 align:start position:0%
with much proof for in the bank I mean
just<00:15:19.260><c> just</c><00:15:19.320><c> give</c><00:15:19.740><c> example</c><00:15:20.370><c> I</c><00:15:21.110><c> mean</c><00:15:22.110><c> I'd</c><00:15:22.230><c> be</c>

00:15:22.250 --> 00:15:22.260 align:start position:0%
just just give example I mean I'd be
 

00:15:22.260 --> 00:15:24.019 align:start position:0%
just just give example I mean I'd be
curious<00:15:22.560><c> to</c><00:15:22.740><c> hear</c><00:15:22.890><c> exactly</c><00:15:23.279><c> what</c><00:15:23.790><c> they're</c>

00:15:24.019 --> 00:15:24.029 align:start position:0%
curious to hear exactly what they're
 

00:15:24.029 --> 00:15:25.340 align:start position:0%
curious to hear exactly what they're
doing<00:15:24.060><c> there</c><00:15:24.570><c> because</c><00:15:24.870><c> it</c><00:15:25.080><c> means</c><00:15:25.200><c> your</c>

00:15:25.340 --> 00:15:25.350 align:start position:0%
doing there because it means your
 

00:15:25.350 --> 00:15:26.930 align:start position:0%
doing there because it means your
knowledge<00:15:25.649><c> proofs</c><00:15:25.920><c> can</c><00:15:26.130><c> be</c><00:15:26.250><c> powerful</c><00:15:26.580><c> for</c><00:15:26.880><c> all</c>

00:15:26.930 --> 00:15:26.940 align:start position:0%
knowledge proofs can be powerful for all
 

00:15:26.940 --> 00:15:28.250 align:start position:0%
knowledge proofs can be powerful for all
sorts<00:15:27.300><c> of</c><00:15:27.360><c> things</c><00:15:27.510><c> but</c><00:15:27.750><c> here</c><00:15:28.020><c> what</c><00:15:28.170><c> I'm</c>

00:15:28.250 --> 00:15:28.260 align:start position:0%
sorts of things but here what I'm
 

00:15:28.260 --> 00:15:30.170 align:start position:0%
sorts of things but here what I'm
talking<00:15:28.589><c> about</c><00:15:28.649><c> is</c><00:15:28.890><c> like</c><00:15:29.040><c> compliance</c><00:15:29.820><c> or</c><00:15:30.029><c> like</c>

00:15:30.170 --> 00:15:30.180 align:start position:0%
talking about is like compliance or like
 

00:15:30.180 --> 00:15:32.660 align:start position:0%
talking about is like compliance or like
some<00:15:30.450><c> information</c><00:15:30.630><c> is</c><00:15:31.320><c> revealed</c><00:15:31.649><c> and</c><00:15:32.310><c> some</c><00:15:32.520><c> is</c>

00:15:32.660 --> 00:15:32.670 align:start position:0%
some information is revealed and some is
 

00:15:32.670 --> 00:15:34.340 align:start position:0%
some information is revealed and some is
kept<00:15:32.940><c> private</c>

00:15:34.340 --> 00:15:34.350 align:start position:0%
kept private
 

00:15:34.350 --> 00:15:36.530 align:start position:0%
kept private
so<00:15:34.470><c> I</c><00:15:34.500><c> like</c><00:15:35.100><c> I'd</c><00:15:35.250><c> be</c><00:15:35.370><c> curious</c><00:15:35.430><c> to</c><00:15:35.700><c> hear</c><00:15:35.850><c> exactly</c>

00:15:36.530 --> 00:15:36.540 align:start position:0%
so I like I'd be curious to hear exactly
 

00:15:36.540 --> 00:15:37.970 align:start position:0%
so I like I'd be curious to hear exactly
where<00:15:36.810><c> they</c><00:15:36.990><c> use</c><00:15:37.110><c> it</c><00:15:37.290><c> doesn't</c><00:15:37.770><c> think</c><00:15:37.860><c> it's</c>

00:15:37.970 --> 00:15:37.980 align:start position:0%
where they use it doesn't think it's
 

00:15:37.980 --> 00:15:39.590 align:start position:0%
where they use it doesn't think it's
like<00:15:38.100><c> there</c><00:15:38.490><c> are</c><00:15:38.640><c> actually</c><00:15:38.970><c> examples</c><00:15:39.270><c> in</c>

00:15:39.590 --> 00:15:39.600 align:start position:0%
like there are actually examples in
 

00:15:39.600 --> 00:15:40.970 align:start position:0%
like there are actually examples in
health<00:15:39.899><c> care</c><00:15:40.110><c> of</c><00:15:40.290><c> spirit</c><00:15:40.560><c> knowledge</c><00:15:40.709><c> groups</c>

00:15:40.970 --> 00:15:40.980 align:start position:0%
health care of spirit knowledge groups
 

00:15:40.980 --> 00:15:42.800 align:start position:0%
health care of spirit knowledge groups
that's<00:15:41.459><c> so</c><00:15:41.640><c> far</c><00:15:41.790><c> there's</c><00:15:41.970><c> no</c><00:15:42.060><c> exams</c><00:15:42.330><c> you're</c><00:15:42.720><c> an</c>

00:15:42.800 --> 00:15:42.810 align:start position:0%
that's so far there's no exams you're an
 

00:15:42.810 --> 00:15:44.449 align:start position:0%
that's so far there's no exams you're an
awful<00:15:42.990><c> person</c><00:15:43.020><c> and</c><00:15:43.440><c> blockchain</c><00:15:43.740><c> that</c><00:15:44.339><c> are</c>

00:15:44.449 --> 00:15:44.459 align:start position:0%
awful person and blockchain that are
 

00:15:44.459 --> 00:15:46.730 align:start position:0%
awful person and blockchain that are
like<00:15:44.640><c> really</c><00:15:44.910><c> working</c><00:15:45.690><c> in</c><00:15:46.110><c> the</c><00:15:46.410><c> way</c><00:15:46.529><c> that</c><00:15:46.709><c> a</c>

00:15:46.730 --> 00:15:46.740 align:start position:0%
like really working in the way that a
 

00:15:46.740 --> 00:15:52.100 align:start position:0%
like really working in the way that a
hospital<00:15:46.890><c> would</c><00:15:47.250><c> be</c><00:15:47.310><c> known</c><00:15:47.610><c> to</c><00:15:50.480><c> or</c><00:15:51.480><c> maybe</c><00:15:51.990><c> you</c>

00:15:52.100 --> 00:15:52.110 align:start position:0%
hospital would be known to or maybe you
 

00:15:52.110 --> 00:15:58.460 align:start position:0%
hospital would be known to or maybe you
have<00:15:52.260><c> a</c><00:15:52.290><c> counter</c><00:15:52.740><c> example</c><00:15:57.080><c> they're</c><00:15:58.080><c> doing</c><00:15:58.380><c> a</c>

00:15:58.460 --> 00:15:58.470 align:start position:0%
have a counter example they're doing a
 

00:15:58.470 --> 00:16:01.699 align:start position:0%
have a counter example they're doing a
kind<00:15:58.709><c> of</c><00:15:58.830><c> real-time</c><00:15:59.070><c> contentment</c><00:16:00.709><c> between</c>

00:16:01.699 --> 00:16:01.709 align:start position:0%
kind of real-time contentment between
 

00:16:01.709 --> 00:16:05.360 align:start position:0%
kind of real-time contentment between
pens<00:16:01.980><c> and</c><00:16:02.540><c> so</c><00:16:03.540><c> this</c><00:16:03.870><c> is</c><00:16:04.020><c> kind</c><00:16:04.260><c> of</c><00:16:04.350><c> they</c><00:16:05.220><c> have</c>

00:16:05.360 --> 00:16:05.370 align:start position:0%
pens and so this is kind of they have
 

00:16:05.370 --> 00:16:09.470 align:start position:0%
pens and so this is kind of they have
had

00:16:09.470 --> 00:16:09.480 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:16:09.480 --> 00:16:13.220 align:start position:0%
 
let's<00:16:10.019><c> enjoy</c><00:16:10.709><c> our</c><00:16:11.009><c> treatments</c><00:16:11.970><c> yes</c><00:16:12.480><c> and</c><00:16:12.989><c> I</c>

00:16:13.220 --> 00:16:13.230 align:start position:0%
let's enjoy our treatments yes and I
 

00:16:13.230 --> 00:16:17.359 align:start position:0%
let's enjoy our treatments yes and I
think<00:16:13.410><c> the</c><00:16:13.649><c> bullet</c><00:16:14.429><c> I</c><00:16:14.809><c> missed</c><00:16:15.809><c> out</c><00:16:16.019><c> on</c><00:16:16.049><c> Laura</c>

00:16:17.359 --> 00:16:17.369 align:start position:0%
think the bullet I missed out on Laura
 

00:16:17.369 --> 00:16:20.269 align:start position:0%
think the bullet I missed out on Laura
it's<00:16:17.489><c> a</c><00:16:17.579><c> pony</c><00:16:17.790><c> scented</c><00:16:18.269><c> bicycle</c><00:16:18.660><c> chain</c><00:16:19.279><c> yes</c>

00:16:20.269 --> 00:16:20.279 align:start position:0%
it's a pony scented bicycle chain yes
 

00:16:20.279 --> 00:16:22.759 align:start position:0%
it's a pony scented bicycle chain yes
undeveloped<00:16:20.999><c> also</c><00:16:21.540><c> into</c><00:16:21.989><c> I</c><00:16:22.019><c> think</c><00:16:22.230><c> is</c><00:16:22.410><c> like</c>

00:16:22.759 --> 00:16:22.769 align:start position:0%
undeveloped also into I think is like
 

00:16:22.769 --> 00:16:25.400 align:start position:0%
undeveloped also into I think is like
NASA<00:16:23.639><c> and</c><00:16:24.119><c> all</c><00:16:24.209><c> those</c><00:16:24.419><c> things</c><00:16:24.629><c> I</c><00:16:24.749><c> can</c><00:16:24.779><c> get</c><00:16:25.169><c> back</c>

00:16:25.400 --> 00:16:25.410 align:start position:0%
NASA and all those things I can get back
 

00:16:25.410 --> 00:16:27.939 align:start position:0%
NASA and all those things I can get back
home

00:16:27.939 --> 00:16:27.949 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:16:27.949 --> 00:16:30.979 align:start position:0%
 
my<00:16:28.949><c> pictures</c><00:16:29.369><c> to</c><00:16:29.399><c> hear</c><00:16:29.759><c> from</c><00:16:30.119><c> that</c><00:16:30.329><c> example</c><00:16:30.689><c> if</c>

00:16:30.979 --> 00:16:30.989 align:start position:0%
my pictures to hear from that example if
 

00:16:30.989 --> 00:16:33.079 align:start position:0%
my pictures to hear from that example if
there<00:16:31.199><c> are</c><00:16:31.230><c> actually</c><00:16:31.679><c> like</c><00:16:31.859><c> is</c><00:16:32.249><c> that</c><00:16:32.309><c> designed</c>

00:16:33.079 --> 00:16:33.089 align:start position:0%
there are actually like is that designed
 

00:16:33.089 --> 00:16:35.419 align:start position:0%
there are actually like is that designed
by<00:16:33.480><c> regulators</c><00:16:34.259><c> are</c><00:16:34.559><c> set</c><00:16:34.799><c> designed</c><00:16:35.129><c> by</c><00:16:35.399><c> a</c>

00:16:35.419 --> 00:16:35.429 align:start position:0%
by regulators are set designed by a
 

00:16:35.429 --> 00:16:39.019 align:start position:0%
by regulators are set designed by a
consortium<00:16:35.669><c> of</c><00:16:36.329><c> banks</c><00:16:36.799><c> so</c><00:16:37.799><c> big</c><00:16:38.129><c> yeah</c><00:16:38.699><c> so</c>

00:16:39.019 --> 00:16:39.029 align:start position:0%
consortium of banks so big yeah so
 

00:16:39.029 --> 00:16:40.819 align:start position:0%
consortium of banks so big yeah so
religion<00:16:39.749><c> is</c><00:16:39.839><c> kind</c><00:16:40.350><c> of</c><00:16:40.439><c> interesting</c>

00:16:40.819 --> 00:16:40.829 align:start position:0%
religion is kind of interesting
 

00:16:40.829 --> 00:16:43.309 align:start position:0%
religion is kind of interesting
intelligent<00:16:41.699><c> I</c><00:16:42.119><c> mean</c><00:16:42.299><c> not</c><00:16:42.480><c> thought</c><00:16:43.019><c> it</c><00:16:43.049><c> so</c>

00:16:43.309 --> 00:16:43.319 align:start position:0%
intelligent I mean not thought it so
 

00:16:43.319 --> 00:16:46.359 align:start position:0%
intelligent I mean not thought it so
much<00:16:43.559><c> in</c><00:16:44.339><c> order</c><00:16:44.549><c> for</c><00:16:44.730><c> this</c><00:16:45.119><c> communicates</c><00:16:45.749><c> to</c>

00:16:46.359 --> 00:16:46.369 align:start position:0%
much in order for this communicates to
 

00:16:46.369 --> 00:16:58.099 align:start position:0%
much in order for this communicates to
political<00:16:47.369><c> lives</c><00:16:56.149><c> also</c><00:16:57.149><c> it</c><00:16:57.540><c> was</c><00:16:57.720><c> basically</c>

00:16:58.099 --> 00:16:58.109 align:start position:0%
political lives also it was basically
 

00:16:58.109 --> 00:17:00.859 align:start position:0%
political lives also it was basically
like<00:16:58.350><c> a</c><00:16:58.410><c> call</c><00:16:58.769><c> government</c><00:16:59.669><c> there</c><00:17:00.480><c> were</c><00:17:00.600><c> three</c>

00:17:00.859 --> 00:17:00.869 align:start position:0%
like a call government there were three
 

00:17:00.869 --> 00:17:04.490 align:start position:0%
like a call government there were three
industry<00:17:01.910><c> limitations</c><00:17:02.910><c> that</c><00:17:03.179><c> defunded</c><00:17:03.929><c> to</c><00:17:04.350><c> do</c>

00:17:04.490 --> 00:17:04.500 align:start position:0%
industry limitations that defunded to do
 

00:17:04.500 --> 00:17:07.399 align:start position:0%
industry limitations that defunded to do
it<00:17:04.679><c> and</c><00:17:05.370><c> the</c><00:17:05.549><c> author</c><00:17:05.699><c> evaluates</c><00:17:06.600><c> and</c><00:17:06.959><c> publish</c>

00:17:07.399 --> 00:17:07.409 align:start position:0%
it and the author evaluates and publish
 

00:17:07.409 --> 00:17:09.949 align:start position:0%
it and the author evaluates and publish
the<00:17:07.559><c> results</c><00:17:07.709><c> and</c><00:17:08.309><c> their</c><00:17:08.600><c> deterrence</c><00:17:09.600><c> to</c><00:17:09.750><c> a</c>

00:17:09.949 --> 00:17:09.959 align:start position:0%
the results and their deterrence to a
 

00:17:09.959 --> 00:17:11.630 align:start position:0%
the results and their deterrence to a
higher

00:17:11.630 --> 00:17:11.640 align:start position:0%
higher
 

00:17:11.640 --> 00:17:17.150 align:start position:0%
higher
Oh<00:17:13.610><c> are</c><00:17:14.610><c> we</c><00:17:14.760><c> of</c><00:17:14.970><c> three</c><00:17:15.240><c> minutes</c><00:17:15.420><c> left</c><00:17:16.160><c> anyone</c>

00:17:17.150 --> 00:17:17.160 align:start position:0%
Oh are we of three minutes left anyone
 

00:17:17.160 --> 00:17:20.740 align:start position:0%
Oh are we of three minutes left anyone
else<00:17:17.339><c> have</c><00:17:17.520><c> any</c><00:17:17.670><c> questions</c><00:17:17.850><c> or</c><00:17:18.390><c> ideas</c>

00:17:20.740 --> 00:17:20.750 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:17:20.750 --> 00:17:24.680 align:start position:0%
 
if<00:17:21.750><c> not</c><00:17:22.050><c> then</c><00:17:22.440><c> thank</c><00:17:23.310><c> you</c><00:17:23.400><c> for</c><00:17:23.790><c> listening</c><00:17:23.940><c> and</c>

00:17:24.680 --> 00:17:24.690 align:start position:0%
if not then thank you for listening and
 

00:17:24.690 --> 00:17:26.480 align:start position:0%
if not then thank you for listening and
yeah<00:17:25.230><c> I</c><00:17:25.260><c> hope</c><00:17:25.500><c> this</c><00:17:25.709><c> hope</c><00:17:26.010><c> you</c><00:17:26.190><c> think</c><00:17:26.370><c> about</c>

00:17:26.480 --> 00:17:26.490 align:start position:0%
yeah I hope this hope you think about
 

00:17:26.490 --> 00:17:31.810 align:start position:0%
yeah I hope this hope you think about
these<00:17:26.790><c> ideas</c><00:17:26.970><c> that</c><00:17:27.390><c> you</c><00:17:27.450><c> guys</c><00:17:27.750><c> do</c>

00:17:31.810 --> 00:17:31.820 align:start position:0%
 
 

00:17:31.820 --> 00:17:38.510 align:start position:0%
 
[Applause]

